The rate of sural nerve violation using the Achillon device: a cadaveric study

Prospective randomized comparison of functional bracing versus rigid immobilization with early weightbearing after modified percutaneous achilles tendon repair under local anesthesia

OBJECTIVE

The optimal treatment and rehabilitation strategy for acute Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) remain a debate. This study aimed to compare the results of the two postoperative regimens after treatment for ATR with modified closed percutaneous repair under local anesthesia.

METHODS

In a 4-year study, 72 consecutive patients with acute complete ATR were randomized after percutaneous repair into a functional group (FG), using a modified brace (28 males, three females; mean age 41.9 [29-71] years) and an immobilization group (IG), wearing a rigid plaster (28 males, two females; mean age 42.2 [29-57] years), for a period of 6 weeks. Except for immobilization, they followed the same weight-bearing and rehabilitation protocols. The follow-up period was 3 years. The complication rate, active and passive ankle range of motion, standing heel-rise test, clinical outcome using the American Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot-ankle score, return to the previous activity level, and subjective assessment were assessed.

RESULTS

There was one rerupture in the IG and two transient sural nerve disturbances in the FG and one in the IG, and one suture extrusion in the IG, with no other complications. The average AOFAS scores were 96.9 ± 4.3 and 96.0 ± 4.9 in the FG and IG, respectively. Patients in the FG reached a final range of motion and muscular strength sooner without limping and were more satisfied with the treatment. No significant differences could be detected between groups according to the results in any of the assessed parameters.

CONCLUSION

Early dynamic functional bracing in patients with ATR treated with modified closed percutaneous repair under local anesthesia resulted in earlier functional recovery with similar final results in terms of complications and functional outcomes, such as rigid postoperative immobilization with standardized rehabilitation and weight-bearing protocol.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I, Prospective randomized study.

Peritendinous Submembrane Access Technique for Management of Acute Ruptures of the Achilles Tendon: A Retrospective Study of 249 Cases

OBJECTIVE

Percutaneous repair is an alternative to open surgical repair of the Achilles tendon with comparable, functional results and low re-rupture and infection rates; however, sural nerve injury is a known complication. The purpose of this study is to design a new surgical procedure, the minimally invasive peritendinous submembrane access technique (MIS-PSAT). It offers optimal results, with excellent functional outcomes, and with minimal soft tissue complications and sural nerve injury.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 249 patients with acute closed Achilles tendon ruptures treated at our institution between 2009 and 2019. All patients underwent MIS-PSAT at our institution and were followed up for 8-48 months. Functional evaluation was based on the Achilles tendon total rupture score (ATRS) and the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale (AOFAS-AHS), associated with local complications and isokinetic tests.

RESULTS

None of the patients had infection, necrosis, or sural nerve injury. Re-rupture occurred in two cases. The average times to return to work and sports was 10.4 and 31.6 weeks, respectively. The average ATRS and AOFAS-AHS scores were 90.2 and 95.7, respectively, with an excellent rate of 99.5%. Isokinetic tests showed that ankle function on the affected side was comparable with that on the healthy side (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The MIS-PSAT for acute Achilles tendon rupture is easy to perform with few complications. Importantly, the surgical technique reduces the risk of sural nerve injuries. Patients have high postoperative satisfaction, low re-rupture rates, and muscle strength, and endurance can be restored to levels similar to those on the healthy side.

Anatomical considerations of the sural nerve in the distal leg: Side branch patterns and significance in nerve harvesting procedures

BACKGROUND

The sural nerve is a somatosensory nerve that provides sensation to the posterolateral aspect of the lower leg and the lateral part of the ankle and foot. Due to its location and anatomical properties, it is often used as an autologous nerve graft. However, the nerve harvest can be complicated by the presence of side branches. The objective of this study was to investigate the anatomy of the sural nerve and to map its side branches. This information can be used to predict the localization of separate incisions during the stair-step incisions technique for nerve harvest, thereby reducing the risk of complications.

METHODS

The study involved the dissection of 50 adult cadaveric legs (25 left and 25 right) obtained from 27 Central European cadavers. The focus of the dissection was to identify the sural nerve, small saphenous vein, and surrounding anatomical structures. Detailed measurements were taken on the side branches of the sural nerve, tributaries of the small saphenous vein, and their interrelationship.

RESULTS

The average number of sural nerve side branches in a single leg was 4.2±1.9. These side branches were categorized into six groups based on their location and course: mediodistal, medioproximal, lateroproximal, laterodistal, medial perpendicular, and lateral perpendicular. Specific patterns of combination of these side branches were also identified and described. The branching point of the sural nerve was found to be 5.8±2.7 cm proximal to the lateral malleolus, whereas the small saphenous vein branching point was located more distally, 4.5 ± 2.8 cm proximal to the lateral malleolus. The highest density of sural nerve side branches was found 2.1-6.0 cm above the lateral malleolus.

CONCLUSION

This study presents valuable data about the relationship between the sural nerve and the surrounding anatomical structures in the distal part of the leg, including the identification of its side branches and their relevance during nerve harvest procedures. On the basis of the most frequent locations of side branches, a three-incision-technique for nerve harvest is proposed.

Biomechanical Comparison of Nonlocked Minimally Invasive and Locked Open Achilles Tendon Simulated Rupture Repairs

BACKGROUND

Open repair of Achilles tendon ruptures is associated with a risk of infection and other wound complications. Although percutaneous repairs reduce these complications, they may increase the risk of nerve injury. This study was designed to determine whether a percutaneous nonlocking repair can approach the gapping resistance offered by a standard open repair under conditions approximating typical postoperative physiotherapy.

METHODS

Ten pairs of cadavers Achilles tendons were transected in situ 5 cm above the insertion. One tendon from each pair was repaired using an open 4-strand Krackow locking loop, and the contralateral tendon was repaired with the Achillon system using the same suture material. Displacement transducers were attached to the medial, lateral, anterior, and posterior aspects of the tendon, spanning the repair. Each tendon underwent 1000 tensile loading cycles to 86.5 N, simulating passive ankle range-of-motion physiotherapy. Gapping was documented on the 1st, 50th, 100th, 500th, and 1000th cycles. The ultimate tensile strength of each repaired tendon was then measured by distracting until gross failure occurred.

RESULTS

Gapping of the percutaneous repairs exceeded that of conventional open repairs on the first, 500th, and 1000th load cycles. All 10 conventionally repaired tendons withstood 1000 load cycles without gross failure, but 4 of 10 percutaneous minimally invasive repairs failed, one on the 9th load cycle and the others between the 100th and 500th cycles. On average, tendons repaired with the open technique withstood 66% greater tensile load in failure testing than those repaired with the percutaneous technique.

CONCLUSION

Open Krackow Achilles tendon repairs may better withstand more aggressive postoperative physiotherapy than nonlocked percutaneous repairs.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The study suggests that surgeons should consider locking suture approaches to avoid loss of repair integrity with early motion.

Outcomes and Complications of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Repair of Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

An acute Achilles tendon rupture is one of the most common sports injuries, affecting 18 per 100,000 persons, and its operative repair has been evolving and increasing in frequency since the mid-1900s. Traditionally, open surgical repair has provided improved functional outcomes, reduced rerupture rates, and a quicker recovery and return to activities at the expense of increased wound complications such as infections and skin necrosis compared with nonoperative management. In 1977, Ma and Griffith introduced the percutaneous approach, and over the following decades, multiple improved techniques, and modifications thereof, have been described with comparable outcomes with open repair.

PURPOSE

The current study aimed to provide updated level 1 evidence comparing open repair with minimally invasive surgery (MIS) through a comprehensive search of the literature published in English, Arabic, Spanish, Portuguese, and German while avoiding limitations of previous studies such as heterogeneous study designs and a small number of included trials.

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS

Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, 2 independent team members searched several databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing open repair and MIS of Achilles tendon ruptures. The primary outcomes were (1) functional outcomes, (2) reruptures, (3) sural nerve injuries, and (4) infections (deep/superficial), whereas the secondary outcomes were (1) skin complications, (2) adhesions, (3) other complications, (4) ankle range of motion, and (5) surgical time.

RESULTS

There were 10 RCTs that qualified for the meta-analysis with a total of 522 patients. Overall, 260 (49.8%) patients underwent open repair, while 262 (50.2%) underwent MIS. The mean postoperative AOFAS score was 94.8 and 95.7 for open repair and MIS, respectively, with a nonsignificant difference (mean difference [MD], -0.73 [95% CI, -1.70 to 0.25]; P = .14; I² = 0%). The pooled mean total complication rate was 15.5% (0%-36.4%) for open repair and 10.4% (0%-45.5%) for MIS, with a nonsignificant statistical difference (odds ratio [OR], 1.50 [95% CI, 0.87-2.57]; P = .14; I² = 40%). The mean rerupture rate was 2.5% (0%-6.8%) for open repair versus 1.5% (0%-4.6%) for MIS, with a nonsignificant statistical difference (OR, 1.56 [95% CI, 0.42-5.70]; P = .50; I² = 0%). No cases of sural nerve injuries were reported in the open repair group. The mean sural nerve injury rate was 3.4% (0%-7.3%) in the MIS group, which was statistically significant (OR, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.03-0.46]; P = .02; I² = 0%). The mean overall superficial infection rate was 6.0% (0%-18.2%) and 0.4% (0%-4.5%) for open repair and MIS, respectively, with a statistically significant difference (OR, 5.70 [95% CI, 1.80-18.02]; P < .001; I² = 0%). The mean overall deep infection rate reported in the open repair group was 1.4% (0%-5.0%), while no deep infection was reported in the MIS group, with no statistically significant difference (OR, 3.14 [95% CI, 0.48-20.54]; P = .23; I² = 0%). There were no significant differences between the open repair and MIS groups in the skin necrosis and dehiscence rate, adhesion rate, or keloid scar rate. The mean surgical time was 51.0 and 29.7 minutes for open repair and MIS, respectively, with a statistically significant difference (MD, 21.13 [95% CI, 15.50-26.75]; P < .001; I² = 15%).

CONCLUSION

Open Achilles tendon repair was associated with a longer surgical time, higher risk of superficial infections, and higher risk of ankle stiffness, while MIS was associated with a greater risk of temporary sural nerve palsy. The rerupture rate and functional outcomes were mostly equivalent. We found MIS to be a safe and reliable technique. However, high-quality standardized RCTs are still needed before recommending MIS as the gold standard for managing Achilles tendon ruptures.

A New Technique of Achilles Tendon Rupture Repaired by Double Transverse Mini-incision to Avoid Sural Nerve Injury: A Consecutive Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

Percutaneous suture is a classic technique used in Achilles tendon repair. However, the complication rates surrounding the sural nerve remain relatively high. Modified percutaneous repair technology can effectively avoid these complications; however, the surgical procedure is complicated. Hence, the present study was conducted to describe a redesigned repair technique for the Achilles tendon able to avoid sural nerve injury and reduce the complexity of the procedure.

METHODS

Data of patients with acute primary Achilles tendon rupture at our hospital from January 2019 to May 2020 were included. Subjects with expectations for surgical scarring underwent a minimally invasive-combined percutaneous puncture technique. The surgical time, requirement for conversion to other technologies, and length of postoperative hospitalization were investigated to assess efficacy. The American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and the Arner-Lindholm scale (A-L scale) were used to assess postoperative clinical outcomes (> 24 months). During the 2-year follow-up, MRI was performed to observe the healing of the Achilles tendon. In addition, subjective satisfaction with surgical scar healing was recorded.

RESULTS

Twenty consecutive subjects with an average follow-up of 28.3 ± 4.5 months (range, 24-41) met the inclusion criteria. None of the 20 enrolled patients required a converted surgical approach. The mean surgical time was 26.9 ± 6.47 min (range, 20-44). None of the patients experienced dysesthesia or anesthesia around the sural nerve. No signs of postoperative infections were observed. MRI data showed that the wounds of the Achilles tendon healed completely in all the subjects. The AOFAS score increased from 55.6 ± 11.07 (range, 28-71) preoperatively to 97.8 ± 3.34 (range, 87-100) at the last follow-up. The A-L scale showed that 90% of the subjects (n = 18) presented as excellent and 10% of the subjects (n = 2) presented as good, with an excellent/good rate of 100%. Moreover, subjects' satisfaction for surgical scars was 9.1 ± 0.78 (upper limit, 10).

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that this technique can achieve good postoperative function, a small surgical incision, and high scar satisfaction. In addition, this technique should be widely used in suturing Achilles tendon ruptures.

Locating the danger zone to avoid injury to the sural nerve during Achilles calcaneal tendon repair. A systematic review of cadaveric studies with clinical implications

INTRODUCTION

Although iatrogenic injuries to the sural nerve (SN) are commonly encountered in calcaneal (Achilles) tendon (CaT) repair surgeries, the relationship between both structures have anatomical variations. A quantitative evidence synthesis has not been yet conducted. Our systematic review aims to better define the safe zone where the SN crosses the lateral border of CaT.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched to locate relevant anatomical studies recording details regarding the distance at which SN crosses the CaT. The Checklist for Anatomical Reviews and Meta-Analyses (CARMA) was followed. The primary outcome was the mean distance from CaT insertion to SN crossing site, to locate a safe zone. The secondary outcome was the mean horizontal distance from the SN to the CaT lateral border.

RESULTS

Seven studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 204 cadaveric limbs. The danger zone was located 2 cm distal and proximal to the mean distance of the crossing point. The mean distance from CaT insertion to the SN crossing site was 9.91 ± 0.67 cm. The mean horizontal distance between SN and the CaT lateral border decreased from a mean of 19.8 ± 2.06 mm at the calcaneal tuberosity level to 3.6 ± 0.4 mm at 10 cm proximal to the tuberosity.

DISCUSSION

This review demonstrated that 10 cm is the average distance from the CaT insertion onto the calcaneal tuberosity to the point of crossing of the SN. A safe zone would be 2 cm away proximally and distally from the crossing point. We recommend placing the proximal lateral sutures away from this region. This finding should help surgeons avoid SN injuries during open or percutaneous approaches for calcaneal tendon rupture.

The modified mini-open technique for repairing total ruptured Achilles tendon using fiber wire with calcaneal fixation. A prospective case series

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes and complications of our modified Maffuli's mini-open technique for repairing acute Achilles tendon rupture using fiber wire and calcaneal fixation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between January 2017 and August 2020, 21 patients with acute rupture of the Achilles tendon who underwent the modified mini-open Maffulli's procedure have been enrolled in the study.

RESULT

All surgical incisions healed well without scar adhesions or infections. One year postoperatively, the ATRS score and AOFAS score were 91.2 ± 1.8; 97.2 ± 1.6 respectively; the range of ankle joint movement was normal. Patients could return to their work and their light sporting activities at the time of 16.9 ± 1.1 weeks and 19.7 ± 0.9 weeks postoperatively, respectively. 21 out of 21 patients were able to perform single heel raise. There were no sural nerve injuries, re-ruptures, tendon elongation, or deep vein thromboses.

CONCLUSION

We have shown that the modified Maffulli's technique using fiber wire with a calcaneal fixation for repairing acute Achilles tendon ruptures to be a safe and reliable method without requiring specialized or expensive materials. It allows a durable repairing, a limitation of healing problems, and a quick return to physical therapy and full activity. This technique can be widely employed in a low-income country.

[Application of channel-assisted minimally invasive repair system in Myerson types and chronic Achilles tendon rupture]

Objective

To investigate the effectiveness of channel-assisted minimally invasive repair system (CAMIR) in treatment of the Myerson types Ⅰ and Ⅱchronic Achilles tendon rupture.

Methods

Between May 2016 and August 2017, 19 patients with Myerson types Ⅰ and Ⅱchronic Achilles tendon ruptures were treated with CAMIR. There were 14 males and 5 females, aged from 21 to 48 years, with an average age of 34.5 years. The disease duration was 5-9 weeks (mean, 7.5 weeks). The preoperative Thompson tests of affected ankles showed positive. There were 11 cases of Myerson type Ⅰwith the gaps of Achilles tendon defect of 1-2 cm (mean, 1.58 cm), and 8 cases of Myerson type Ⅱwith the gaps of Achilles tendon defect of 2.5-4.0 cm (mean, 3.16 cm). The ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion range of motion were measured before and after operation; the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle and hindfoot score was used to assess the patients' ankle joint function.

Results

No major blood vessels, nerves, and other tissue structures were damaged during the operation; 3 cases of Myerson type Ⅰ were converted to Myerson type Ⅱ according to the gaps of the defect after the scar tissue was removed during the operation. After operation, the depressed part of the Achilles tendon disappeared, the continuity of the tendon was restored, and the Thompson tests were negative. All 19 patients were followed up 12-25 months, with an average of 14 months. All incisions healed by first intention, and no infection and skin necrosis occurred; all the pre-injury activities and exercise were restored at 6 months after operation. During the follow-up period, no heel pain or re-rupture occurred. At last follow-up, except that there was no significant difference in ankle dorsiflexion range of motion of Myerson type Ⅰ patients ( t=2.118, P=0.071), the AOFAS ankle and hindfoot score, ankle plantarflexion range of motion of Myerson types Ⅰ and Ⅱ patients, and ankle dorsiflexion range of motion of Myerson type Ⅱ patients were significantly improved when compared with preoperative values ( P<0.05). According to AOFAS ankle and hindfoot function score, the ankle joint function of type Ⅰ patients was excellent in 7 cases and good in 1 case, and of type Ⅱ patients were excellent in 8 cases, good in 2 cases, and fair in 1 case.

Conclusion

CAMIR is safe and effective in the treatment of Myerson types Ⅰ and Ⅱ chronic Achilles tendon rupture with fewer complications and better functional recovery of ankle joint.

Anatomic relationship of the sural nerve when performing Achilles tendon repair using the percutaneous Achilles repair system, a cadaveric study

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive techniques for Achilles tendon repair are increasing due to reports of similar rerupture rates using open and percutaneous techniques with fewer wound complications and quicker recovery with percutaneous methods. The goal of this study was to investigate quantitatively the relationship and risk of injury to the sural nerve during Achilles tendon repair when using the Percutaneous Achilles Repair System (PARS) (Arthrex®, Naples, FL), by recording the distance between the passed needles and the sural nerve as well identifying any direct violation of the nerve with needle passage or nerve entrapment within the suture after the jig was removed. The hypothesis of the study is that the PARS technique can be performed safely and without significant risk of injury to the sural nerve.

METHODS

A total of five needles were placed through the PARS jig in each of 10 lower extremity cadaveric specimens using the proximal portion after simulation of a midsubstance Achilles tendon rupture. Careful dissection was performed to measure the distance of the sural nerve in relation to the passed needles. The sutures were then pulled out through the incision as the jig was removed from the proximal portion of the tendon and observation of the suture in relation to the tendon was documented.

RESULTS

Of the 10 cadaveric specimens, none had violation of the sural nerve. Zero of the 50 (0%) needles directly punctured the sural nerve. In addition, upon retraction of the jig, all sutures were noted to reside within the tendon sheath with no entrapment of the sural nerve noted.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated the variable course of the sural nerve and identifies the potential risk for sural nerve injury when using the PARS for Achilles tendon repair. However, this study provides additional evidence of safety from an anatomic standpoint that explains the outcomes demonstrated in the clinical trials. With this information the authors believe surgeons should feel comfortable they can replicate those outcomes while minimizing risk of sural nerve injury when the technique is used correctly.

Open versus minimally-invasive surgery for Achilles tendon rupture: a meta-analysis study

INTRODUCTION

Despite the presence of various different surgical procedures, the preferable technique for repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures is unknown and, therefore, object of discussions. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare clinical outcomes and complication-rates between the minimally invasive and the standard open repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. In September 2019 the main databases were accessed. All clinical trials of evidence level I to III comparing minimally invasive vs. open surgery of Achilles tendon rupture were included in the present study. Only articles reporting quantitative data under the outcomes of interest were included. Missing data under the outcomes of interest warranted the exclusion from the present work. For the statistical analysis we referred to the Review Manager Software Version 5.3. (The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen). Continuous data were analysed through the inverse variance method. For the effect estimate the mean difference was used. Dichotomous data were analysed through the Mante-Haenszel method via odd ratio effect measure. The confidence interval was set at 95% in all the comparisons. Values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 25 articles were included for meta-analysis. The funnel plot revealed poor data dispersion, attesting to this study a low risk of publication bias. The quality of the methodological assessment was moderate. Data from 2223 (1055 open, 1168 minimally invasive) surgical procedures were extracted. The mean follow-up was of 24.29 ± 22.4 months. The open group reported a lower value of post-operative palpable knot at last follow-up and a lower rate of sural nerve palsy. In the minimally-invasive group a shorter surgery duration and a lower rate of post-operative wound necrosis and reduced risk of wound scarring and adhesions has been evidenced. The minimally-invasive cohort detected the lowest values of superficial and deep infections. In both groups no significant difference was shown in re-rupture rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to the minimally-invasive Achilles tendon reconstruction, the open procedure evidenced a lower rate of sural nerve palsy and postoperative palpable knot, whereas in the minimally-invasive reconstruction group quicker surgery duration, a lower rate of post-operative wound necrosis, superficial and deep infections and less scar tissue adhesions could be observed. No relevant discrepancies were detected among the two techniques in terms of post-operative re-rupture.

Achillon versus modified minimally invasive repair treatment in acute Achilles tendon rupture

PURPOSE

To date, the best treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture (AATR) is still inconclusive. Achillon seems to be a promising approach with satisfactory function and low complication rate. We hypothesize a modified minimally invasive repair (MMIR), which provides direct visualization of proximal tendon stump without specialized equipment that could provide comparable results. This trial is aimed to evaluate the functional and surgical outcomes of MMIR comparing with Achillon.

METHODS

From February 2013 to February 2017, 114 patients with AATR were enrolled in this trial, underwent an alternative operation (Achillon or MMIR), and accelerated rehabilitation protocol. Forty-four patients took the Achillon and the other 70 patients took the MMIR at their subjective choice. One hundred eleven full follow-up data were obtained including Achilles tendon total rupture score (ATRS), time back to work, rerupture rate, overall complication rate, and operation time.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between groups in demographic characters. There was no statistical difference between both groups regarding to time return to work and ATRS at 3rd, 6th, 12th, and 24th month, respectively. Five reruptures and two Achilles tendons tethering to skins were found in the Achillon group, and two reruptures and one sural nerve injury in the MMIR group. No wound infection and dehiscence occurred. Overall complication rate in the Achillon group is higher (16.3% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.044). The operation time of Achillon is less than MMIR (34.84 vs. 39.71, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Both techniques combining with accelerated rehabilitation showed to be reliable and effective. MMIR is safer and more economical, and Achillon is faster.

Comparison of channel-assisted minimally invasive repair and 3 common Achilles tendon restoration techniques

The present study aimed to investigate the biomechanical comparison of channel-assisted minimally invasive restoration and three common Achilles tendon restoration techniques in an in vitro model via a progressive rehabilitation program. The 42 porcine tendons were randomly assigned to the following six groups of tendons (n=7/group): Achillon, percutaneous Achilles repair system (PARS), Krackow, channel-assisted minimally invasive repair (CAMIR), CAMIR augmentation (CAMIR⁺), CAMIR-5 (repair with No. 5 Ethibond suture). There was no significant difference in elongation among groups following the first 10 loading cycles, which consisted of 20-100 N at 1 Hz. The elongation of the CAMIR group (7.51±1.77 mm) was significantly longer than the Achillon group (3.19±0.57 mm) and PARS group (3.73±0.66 mm; P<0.05) following 1,000 cycles. However, the CAMIR group exhibited no significant difference vs. the Krackow (7.32±1.09 mm) and CAMIR⁺ groups (7.11±1.50 mm) following 1,000 cycles. Following 2,000 cycles, there was no significant difference between the CAMIR-5 (7.99±1.68 mm) group, and the Achillon (3.19±0.57 mm) and PARS groups (3.73±0.66 mm). At the point of restoration construct failure, the total cycles of the CAMIR group (median, 1,000; range, 1,000-1,000) were significantly less than the Achillon group (median, 2,000; range, 2,000-2,013) and PARS group (median, 2,000; range, 2,000-2,010; P<0.05), but had no significant difference compared with the Krackow group (median, 1,000; range, 1,000-1,000) and CAMIR⁺ group 1,000 (median, 1,000; range, 1,000-1,004). There was also no significant difference between the CAMIR-5 group (median, 2,000; range, 2,000-2,000), and the Achillon group (median, 2,000; range, 2,000-2,013) and PARS group (median, 2,000; range, 2,000-2,010). Restricted by the strength of suture, the one-suture CAMIR restoration technique was weaker than the three-suture Achillon and PARS restoration techniques, but there was no significant difference with the open Krackow restoration technique, which provides a reliable mechanical strength for repairing. CAMIR has an advantage of reducing the risk of suture reactivity.

Minimally Invasive Versus Open Repair for Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture: Meta-Analysis Showing Reduced Complications, with Similar Outcomes, After Minimally Invasive Surgery

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on the optimal technique for repairing an acute Achilles tendon rupture. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the complications, subjective outcomes, and functional results between minimally invasive surgery and open repair of an Achilles tendon rupture.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EBSCOhost, and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing minimally invasive surgery and open repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures. A meta-analysis was performed, while bias and the quality of the evidence were rated according to the Cochrane Database questionnaire and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines. The meta-analysis was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULTS

Eight studies, with 182 patients treated with minimally invasive surgery and 176 treated with open repair, were included. The meta-analysis showed a significantly decreased risk ratio (RR) of 0.21 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.10 to 0.40, p = 0.00001) for overall complications and 0.15 (95% CI = 0.05 to 0.46, p = 0.0009) for wound infection after minimally invasive surgery. Patients treated with minimally invasive surgery were more likely to report good or excellent subjective results (RR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.33, p = 0.009). No differences between groups were found with respect to reruptures, sural nerve injury, return to preinjury activity level, time to return to work, or ankle range of motion. The overall quality of evidence was generally low because of a substantial risk of bias, heterogeneity, indirectness of outcome reporting, and evaluation of a limited number of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a significantly decreased risk of postoperative complications, especially wound infection, when acute Achilles tendon rupture was treated with minimally invasive surgery compared with open surgery. Patients treated with minimally invasive surgery were significantly more likely to report a good or excellent subjective outcome. Current evidence is associated with high heterogeneity and a considerable risk of bias.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Management of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: A review

Objectives

The incidence of acute Achilles tendon rupture appears to be increasing. The aim of this study was to summarize various therapies for acute Achilles tendon rupture and discuss their relative merits.

Methods

A PubMed search about the management of acute Achilles tendon rupture was performed. The search was open for original manuscripts and review papers limited to publication from January 2006 to July 2017. A total of 489 papers were identified initially and finally 323 articles were suitable for this review.

Results

The treatments of acute Achilles tendon rupture include operative and nonoperative treatments. Operative treatments mainly consist of open repair, percutaneous repair, mini-open repair, and augmentative repair. Traditional open repair has lower re-rupture rates with higher risks of complications. Percutaneous repair and mini-open repair show similar re-rupture rates but lower overall complication rates when compared with open repair. Percutaneous repair requires vigilance against nerve damage. Functional rehabilitation combining protected weight-bearing and early controlled motion can effectively reduce re-rupture rates with satisfactory outcomes. Biological adjuncts help accelerating tendon healing by adhering rupture ends or releasing highly complex pools of signalling factors.

Conclusion

The optimum treatment for complete rupture remains controversial. Both mini-open repair and functional protocols are attractive alternatives, while biotherapy is a potential future development.

Cite this article: X. Yang, H. Meng, Q. Quan, J. Peng, S. Lu, A. Wang. Management of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: A review. Bone Joint Res 2018;7:561–569. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.710.BJR-2018-0004.R2.

Achillon versus open surgery in acute Achilles tendon repair

BACKGROUND

Open Achilles tendon repairs (OATR) are associated with high complication rates. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques like the Achillon Achilles tendon repair (AATR) were developed to reduce this. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare OATR with AATR.

METHODS

We performed an extensive literature search including all studies that compared the two techniques. Outcomes assessed included overall complication rate, re-rupture rate, sural nerve injury, wound length, The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Scores (AOFAS) scores and return to sports.

RESULTS

Eight studies were suitable for inclusion totalling 210 patients in the AATR group vs 233 patients in the OATR group. Total complication rates were significantly reduced in the Achillon patients with odd ratio of 0.14 (CI 95%, 0.08-0.27, P<0.00001) in favour. There were no significant differences in re-rupture rate, sural nerve injury, return to sports and AOFAS scores following repair between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

AATR has fewer overall complications compared with OATR. It should be considered as an alternative to open surgical repair.

A simple suture-guiding device for minimally invasive Achilles tendon repair

BACKGROUND

Our hypothesis is to utilize a simple suture-guiding device for minimally invasive repair of Achilles tendon without any extra cost with a minimal risk of rerupture. The purpose of this study is to investigate the results of our minimally invasive technique for Achilles tendon repair using a simple ovarian clamp for suture guiding.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture were treated with minimally invasive repair by an expert orthopaedic surgeon. Instead of an Achillon device, an ovarian clamp was directed to the proximal and distal parts of the Achilles tendon. All data relating to daily activities, walking, climbing stairs, sports activity, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) and Thermannscores were recorded. Sural nerve was evaluated with physical examination for paraesthesia, hyperaesthesia, lateralis cruris and foot pain in all patient controls.

RESULTS

The average AOFAS score was 97.06 (76-100). All patients had intact Achilles tendon at last control. No rerupture was observed. Average time taken to return to work was 30.8 days (28-60 days). After 6 months, all patients returned to their previous sports activities.

CONCLUSION

For Achilles tendon ruptures, minimally invasive repair techniques have shown successful results with low complication rates. Besides their success, some suture-guiding devices bring extra costs for patients or health insurance. Minimally invasive techniques may be performed with devices without any extra cost. Our new suture-guiding device provides knot placement under paratenon like Achillon device to improve outcomes, provides early return to work and minimizes the complications. Finally, our suture-guiding device has no extra cost.

Outcomes and Complications Following Endoscopically Assisted Percutaneous Achilles Tendon Repair

PURPOSE

To review functional and clinical outcomes as well as complications in patients who underwent endoscopically assisted percutaneous Achilles tendon repair using 4-strand core suture configuration via a 6-portal technique.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review with prospectively collected data was performed in 23 consecutive patients who underwent endoscopically assisted percutaneous Achilles tendon repair between 2008 and 2015. The minimum follow-up to be included in the study was 24 months. The primary outcome was Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Sports subscales; Short Form-36 (SF-36), physical and mental component summaries (PCS and MCS); and visual analog scale (VAS). The secondary outcomes included tourniquet time, recovery time, and complications.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients (18 males and 5 females, all unilateral) with the mean age of 36.7 years were included and 6 patients were repaired using an open technique because they did not meet the inclusion criteria owing to presenting late in the clinic (injury more than 2-3 weeks). The average time to final follow-up was 54.1 months. The average tourniquet time was 41.3 minutes. There was significant improvement of VAS (7.9/10 to 0.1/10), SF-36 (PCS, 32.5-44.7, and MCS, 47.9-51.4), and FAAM (ADL, 26.1.0-83.0, and Sports, 0-61.7). The average time to return to activities of daily living, work, and sports were 8.0 weeks, 8.8 weeks, and 5.7 months, respectively. The postoperative morbidity included superficial wound infection at the portal (1 patient with underlying type 2 diabetes, 4.3%) and there was no rerupture, deep vein thrombosis, sural nerve injury, and painful scar in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopically assisted percutaneous Achilles tendon repair has significant improvement in terms of functional outcomes as measured with the FAAM, SF-36, and VAS. This technique is safe and feasible with minimal postoperative pain and morbidities, early return to activities, and satisfactory functional outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Editorial Commentary: Is Endoscopy Really Helpful During Repair of Acute Rupture of the Achilles Tendon?

Endoscopically assisted Achilles tendon repair is an attractive minimally invasive approach to reduce the risk of sural nerve injury. However, I do not believe that endoscopy is necessary for all types of minimally invasive Achilles tendon repair. Endoscopy is only helpful to make suture passage through the proximal lateral portal safe. It cannot help to reduce the risk of sural nerve injury if the tendon is repaired with percutaneous locking sutures. Abandonment of the proximal lateral portal and development of "all-inside" endoscopic repair of the Achilles tendon with locking sutures should be the future goal.

Outcomes and complications of percutaneous versus open repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Acute Achilles tendon rupture (AATR) is a frequent injury occurring dominantly in young to middle-aged males. Outcomes and complications between percutaneous and open repair are still controversial. Thus, the purpose of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the outcomes and complications of these two operative methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched multiple databases: PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library up to October 2016. Two reviewers independently screened the studies for eligibility, evaluated the quality and extracted data from eligible studies, with confirmation by cross-checking. The major results and conclusions were concluded, and the different complication rates and functional outcomes were compared. Meta-analysis was processed by Rev Man 5.3 software.

RESULTS

Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and seven retrospective cohort studies involving 815 patients met the inclusion criteria. The sural nerve injury rate in the percutaneous group was significantly higher (RR = 3.52, 95%CI 1.45 to 8.57, P = 0.006). However, deep infection rate in the open group was higher (RR = 0.33, 95%CI 0.11 to 0.96, P = 0.04) and subgroup analysis of five RCTs showed no significant difference (RR = 0.42, 95%CI 0.09 to 2.10, P = 0.29). No significant difference was seen regarding the rate of re-rupture. The time of operation in the percutaneous group was shorter (RR = -1.99, 95%CI -3.81 to -0.80, P = 0.001). American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score showed statistically different in the two groups. Other functional outcomes were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous repair has the advantages of operation time, deep infection and AOFAS score. The functional outcomes were similar in two treatment groups except AOFAS score. Despite the higher incidence of sural nerve injury, we still believe that percutaneous repair is superior to open repair for treating AATR.

Outcome following use of the Achillon jig for the repair of acutely ruptured Achilles tendons

We report a series of 143 patients who underwent limited open Achilles tendon repair using the Achillon device at a mean follow-up of 25 months. All patients attending our institution with a diagnosis of acute Achilles tendon rupture were considered for operative repair using the Achillon jig unless they declined surgery or met the exclusion criteria. Following surgery patients were contacted and asked to complete an Achilles Tendon Rupture Score (ATRS). The clinical records were reviewed for evidence of complications, demographic information and evidence of re-rupture. Statistical analysis of subgroups including age at presentation, delay to surgery and patients with complications was carried out using the Kruskal Wallis non-parametric test. We report no re-ruptures at a mean of 25 months (minimum 12 months) following surgery. The mean ATRS score was 84/100 (range 15-100). There was no statistical significance between any of the subgroups analyzed. In conclusion, acute Achilles repair using the Achillon jig is safe, with a low re-rupture rate, excellent ATRS scores at a minimum of 12 months post-operatively and low complications. The incidence of sural nerve injury is much lower than published series of percutaneous Achilles tendon repair without the use of a jig.

MRI Evaluation of Achilles Tendon Rotation and Sural Nerve Anatomy: Implications for Percutaneous and Limited-Open Achilles Tendon Repair

BACKGROUND

Limited-open and percutaneous Achilles tendon (AT) repair techniques have limited visibility, which may result in sural nerve violation and poor tendon targeting. The goal of this study was to assess the in vivo rotation of the AT and its distance to the sural nerve in ruptured and nonruptured ATs to develop guidelines to aid in limited-open and percutaneous repair techniques.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted to identify magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies of patients with ruptured and healthy (nonruptured) ATs. AT rotation and distance to the sural nerve in the anterior-posterior (A-P) and medial-lateral (M-L) planes were measured at the level of and proximal to the ankle.

RESULTS

The AT was externally rotated in both ruptured and nonruptured cohorts. Ruptured ATs showed greater external rotation than nonruptured ATs at the ankle (15.8 ± 16.2 degrees vs 5.9 ± 9.0 degrees, P = .008) but not at 10 cm proximal to the tendon's insertion (10.9 ± 10.9 degrees vs 6.1 ± 8.4 degrees, P = .139). Proximal AT rotation was negatively correlated with rupture height (r = -0.477, P = .029). At 4 cm proximal to the AT insertion, the sural nerve was closer anteriorly to and farther laterally from the AT in ruptures than in nonruptures (P < .001). At 10 cm proximal to the AT insertion, the sural nerve was farther posteriorly and laterally from the AT in ruptures than in nonruptures (P = .027 and P < .001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

We found that the AT was more externally rotated in ruptured than in nonruptured tendons at the ankle and that its distance to the sural nerve differed between the 2 cohorts in the A-P and M-L planes, likely due to increased AT rotation and swelling with ruptures. To minimize sural nerve injury and improve tendon targeting, we suggest an external rotation of 11 degrees at the proximal end of the rupture and 16 degrees at the distal end when using percutaneous and limited-open AT repair devices to try to minimize sural nerve violation and increase tendon capture, which can decrease rates of complication and rerupture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Channel-assisted minimally invasive repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous (minimally invasive) suturing is a promising option for Achilles tendon (AT) repair with low rerupture and infection rates. Sural nerve lesions are the major problem to avoid with the technique. A new device was therefore designed for suturing the AT, resulting in channel-assisted minimally invasive repair (CAMIR). The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and functional outcomes of CAMIR with traditional open techniques.

METHOD

Eighty two patients with AT rupture were included: 41 for CAMIR, 41 for open repair. All patients followed a standardized rehabilitation protocol. Follow-ups were at 12 and 24 months after surgery. Functional evaluation was based on the clinical American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society score associated with neurologic deficit (sural nerve), calf circumference, range of motion (ROM), and isometric testing.

RESULTS

There was no difference between groups regarding plantar flexor strength, ankle ROM, or calf circumference. CAMIR significantly decreased the operative time compared to open repair (17 vs. 56 min, P < 0.0001). Mean scar length was greater in the open repair group (10 vs. 2 cm, P < 0.0001). There were no wound complications in the CAMIR group but four in the open repair group (P < 0.0001). No deep vein thrombosis, rerupture, or sural nerve injury occurred.

CONCLUSION

CAMIR and open repair yielded essentially identical clinical and functional outcomes. Sural nerve injuries can be minimized using CAMIR by carefully placing the suture channel with a stab incision and special trocar based on a modified Bunnell suture technique.

Management of achilles tendon injury: A current concepts systematic review

Achilles tendon rupture has been on the rise over recent years due to a variety of reasons. It is a debilitating injury with a protracted and sometimes incomplete recovery. Management strategy is a controversial topic and evidence supporting a definite approach is limited. Opinion is divided between surgical repair and conservative immobilisation in conjunction with functional orthoses. A systematic search of the literature was performed. Pubmed, Medline and EmBase databases were searched for Achilles tendon and a variety of synonymous terms. A recent wealth of reporting suggests that conservative regimens with early weight bearing or mobilisation have equivalent or improved rates of re-rupture to operative regimes. The application of dynamic ultrasound assessment of tendon gap may prove crucial in minimising re-rupture and improving outcomes. Studies employing functional assessments have found equivalent function between operative and conservative treatments. However, no specific tests in peak power, push off strength or athletic performance have been reported and whether an advantage in operative treatment exists remains undetermined.

Incidence of complications after Achillon® mini-open suture system for repair of acute midsubstance achilles tendon ruptures: a systematic review

The most appropriate operative treatment of acute midsubstance Achilles tendon ruptures is controversial. One approach uses a mini-open, device-assisted suture system (Achillon(®) System(™), Integra LifeSciences Corp, Plainsboro, NJ) that has been generally available since 2002. To date, the incidence of complications with this system has not yet been evaluated. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review of electronic databases and relevant peer-reviewed sources as outlined by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for the preparation of systematic reviews. Studies that reported acute (injury to surgery interval ≤ 10 days) midsubstance Achilles tendon ruptures repaired with the Achillon(®) mini-open suture system, provided a detailed description of all complications encountered, and a mean follow-up period of 12 months or more and 15 repairs or more were included. A total of 33 studies were identified, of which 8 (24%) met our inclusion criteria involving 253 repairs. Four studies were prospective and involved 169 repairs. The weighted mean age for the entire cohort was 39.5 (range 22 to 82) years, and the weighted mean follow-up period was 19.2 (range 5 to 44) months. The incidence of complications was 8.3% (21 of 253) and included 8 (3.2%) repeat ruptures, 5 (2%) incision problems, 3 (1.2%) sural nerve injuries, 3 (1.2%) suture reactions or irritations, and 2 (0.8%) infections. Our systematic review revealed that this mini-open, device-assisted suture system provides a safe and reproducible technique to repair acute midsubstance Achilles tendon ruptures with an acceptable incidence of complications.

An anatomical and cadaveric study examining the risk of sural nerve injury in percutaneous Achilles tendon repair using the Achillon device

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous Achilles tendon repairs are gaining in popularity. This study aims to quantify the risk of sural nerve injury when using the Achillon device.

METHODS

The Achillon device was instrumented into 15 cadaveric specimens and through dissection the rate of sural nerve puncture and the position of the sural nerve in relation to the Achilles tendon was documented.

RESULTS

The sural nerve was found lateral to the Achilles tendon insertion point over a range of 14.3mm and crossed the lateral border of the Achilles tendon over a range of 57.7mm. The sural nerve was punctured a total of 6 times and in 4 out of 15 cadaveric specimens (27%). Four out of the 6 punctures occurred when the Achillon device was instrumented distally.

CONCLUSIONS

The sural nerve displays a highly variable anatomical course and there is a risk of puncture during percutaneous Achilles tendon repair using the Achillon device.

Achilles tendon ruptures

The incidence of acute Achilles tendon ruptures is on the rise. This is thought to be due to the increasing number of middle-aged persons participating in athletic and/or strenuous activity. Ruptures of the Achilles tendon can be severely debilitating, with deficits seen years after the initial incident. Also, these injuries can have substantial socioeconomic impacts regardless of the treatment selected. Debate continues over the optimal treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures, especially the argument whether to treat patients nonoperatively or surgically. Newer evidence shows that functional rehabilitation, including early weight-bearing, should be an integral part of successful treatment of acute Achilles ruptures. Further research is needed to further investigate the ideal treatment and rehabilitation protocols.

Minimally invasive Achilles tendon repair: a modification of the Achillon technique

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to present the results of a new minimally invasive operative method for Achilles tendon (AT) ruptures that could reduce nerve injuries and add no extra cost.

METHODS

Thirteen patients with acute AT ruptures who were treated with minimally invasive surgery and followed for a minimum of 12 months were included. At the latest follow-up, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, calf diameters, ability to walk on tiptoe, and ultrasound examination were evaluated. The average age was 42.8 years (range, 31-62 years). Average follow up was 24.5 months (range, 12-34 months).

RESULTS

AOFAS score was 92.5 (range, 85-100). Average calf diameters on the operated and nonoperated extremities were 38.9 cm (range, 36-44 cm) and 38.9 cm (range, 36-41 cm), respectively. On ultrasound examination, the site of the rupture was found to be 46.2 mm proximal from the calcaneal insertion, and the operated side was found to be significantly thicker than the nonoperated side (P = .008). There was 1 deep vein thrombosis, which recovered without sequelae. There were no wound problems, reruptures, or nerve injuries.

CONCLUSIONS

This new minimally invasive operative method was successful, showing good functional results and low complication rates. In our experience, the use of 3 continuous polyester sutures was less irritable with 3 knots.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.