Measuring Visualized Joint Surface in Hallux Metatarsophalangeal Arthroscopy

Small Joint Arthroscopy of the Foot

Recently, there have been new advances in the arthroscopic approach to small joints of the foot. This is directly related to the improvement of surgical equipment, new techniques, and publications. These improvements led to broadening indications as well as minimizing complications. Several articles recently presented the uses of arthroscopic surgery in the small joints of the foot; however, the use is still relatively limited. Arthroscopic evaluation of the small joints of the foot includes the first metatarsophalangeal, lesser metatarsophalangeal, tarsometatarsal, talonavicular, and calcaneocuboid joints as well as the interphalangeal joint to the great toe and lesser toes.

Arthroscopic accessibility of the first metatarsophalangeal joint for osteochondral defects of the metatarsal head by two-portal technique - comparing joint distraction and plantarflexion

BACKGROUND

Several techniques and approaches for first metatarsophalangeal (MTP1) joint arthroscopy have been reported, where joint accessibility plays a key role. This study aimed to evaluate differences in arthroscopic accessibility of the first metatarsal head (MTH1) comparing non-invasive distraction and maximum plantarflexion in a two-portal approach.

METHODS

Forty fresh-frozen lower leg specimens were included and divided into a distraction group (D-group) and a plantarflexion group (PF-group). A two-portal technique (1.9 mm-30°-scope) was used for arthroscopy, maximum reach at the MTH1 was marked. Following arthroscopy, specimens were dissected and examined for iatrogenic injuries. The reached area at the chondral surface was pinned and accessibility calculated.

RESULTS

Accessibility of the MTH1 was 58.03 % ± 13.64 (D-group) and 55.93 % ± 10.30 (PF-group, p = 0.51). The dorsomedial hallucal nerve was injured in one specimen (2.5 %).

CONCLUSION

Maximum plantarflexion showed no difference in arthroscopic MTP1 joint accessibility compared to non-invasive distraction in a two-portal approach. During dorsomedial portal placement, the dorsomedial hallucal nerve is at risk for iatrogenic injury.