Once daily busulfan cyclophosphamide is well tolerated and effective as a preparative regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant

Cyclophosphamide followed by intravenous targeted busulfan for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes

Targeted busulfan ((T)BU) and cyclophosphamide (CY) for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation carries a high risk of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) in patients undergoing transplantation for myelofibrosis. We tested the hypothesis that reversing the sequence of administration (from (T)BU/CY to CY/(T)BU) would reduce SOS and day +100 nonrelapse mortality. We enrolled 51 patients with myelofibrosis (n = 20), acute myelogenous leukemia (n = 20), or myelodysplastic syndrome (n = 11) in a prospective trial of CY/(T)BU conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. CY 60 mg/kg/day i.v. for 2 days was followed by daily i.v. BU for 4 days, targeted to a concentration at steady state (Css) of 800-900 ng/mL. Compared with (T)BU/CY-conditioned patients, CY/(T)BU-conditioned patients had greater exposure to CY (P < .0001) and less exposure to 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide (P < .0001). Clinical outcomes were compared between cases and controls (n = 271) conditioned with (T)BU/CY for the same indications. In patients with myelofibrosis, CY/(T)BU conditioning was associated with a significantly reduced incidence of SOS (0% versus 30% after (T)BU/CY; P = .006), whereas the incidence of SOS was low in both cohorts with acute myelogenous leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome. Day +100 mortality was significantly lower in the CY/(T)BU cohort (2% versus 13%; P = .01). CY/(T)BU conditioning had a marked affect on the pharmacokinetics of CY and was associated with significantly lower incidence of SOS and day +100 mortality, suggesting that CY/(T)BU is superior to (T)BU/CY as conditioning for patients with myelofibrosis.

Intravenous busulfan: a guide to its use as conditioning treatment before transplantation of haematopoietic progenitor cells

With intravenous administration of busulfan (Busilvex®), the therapeutic range of the drug is achieved in more paediatric patients than after oral busulfan administration. In clinical trials in paediatric and adult patients, intravenous busulfan-based preconditioning treatment regimen prior to haematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation (HPCT) provided high rates of engraftment, low transplant-related mortality rates and good overall survival and progression-free survival outcomes. Intravenous busulfan was considered to have an acceptable tolerability profile.

Intravenous busulfan: a guide to its use as conditioning treatment before transplantation of haematopoietic progenitor cells

With intravenous administration of busulfan (Busilvex®), the therapeutic range of the drug is achieved in more paediatric patients than after oral busulfan administration. In clinical trials in paediatric and adult patients, intravenous busulfan-based preconditioning treatment regimen prior to haematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation (HPCT) provided high rates of engraftment, low transplant-related mortality rates and good overall survival and progression-free survival outcomes. Intravenous busulfan was considered to have an acceptable tolerability profile.

[A medical-pharmaceutical partnership model as a contributor to the success in conditioning regimen for allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in adults: a cross-reflection on our organizations]

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplant (allo-SCT) remains the only cure for many hematological malignancies and some benign and congenital diseases. Busulfan, proposed in its injectable form, has quickly become a mainstay of pharmacological and myeloablative (or non-myeloablative) conditioning. This is following the outbreak in 2010 of a multicenter international clinical phase II trial, we tested the robustness and reliability of our organization in a complex model of organization and multifactorial partnership. In this type "BuCy2" protocol based on a classical treatment duration of 4 consecutive days, the administration of IV busulfan is given in one single daily infusion instead of the conventional 16 infusions, while keeping the same total dose. Under these conditions, the treatment is totally secured using a therapeutic drug monitoring of busulfan, applied in real-time. The process is technically complex and requires the very close cooperation of the teams involved. A strength, weakness, opportunity and threat (SWOT) analysis has been constructed; it fully supports continuous quality improvement to the triple benefit of the nursing chain, the patients and their environment. Several critical points were identified and corrected. The experiment strongly contributes to the safety and security of the medication circuit at the hospital and, improves the performance of allo-SCT. It also contributes to the protection of all actors in the health field and their working environment via a well-functioning quality management system.