1
|
Buttery SC, Williams PJ, Alghamdi SM, Philip KEJ, Perkins A, Kallis C, Quint JK, Polkey MI, Breuls S, Buekers J, Chynkiamis N, Delgado-Ortiz L, Demeyer H, Frei A, Garcia-Aymerich J, Gimeno-Santos E, Koch S, Megaritis D, Polhemus A, Troosters T, Vogiatzis I, Watz H, Hopkinson NS. Investigating the prognostic value of digital mobility outcomes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir Rev 2023; 32:230134. [PMID: 37993126 PMCID: PMC10663939 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0134-2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reduced mobility is a central feature of COPD. Assessment of mobility outcomes that can be measured digitally (digital mobility outcomes (DMOs)) in daily life such as gait speed and steps per day is increasingly possible using devices such as pedometers and accelerometers, but the predictive value of these measures remains unclear in relation to key outcomes such as hospital admission and survival. METHODS We conducted a systematic review, nested within a larger scoping review by the MOBILISE-D consortium, addressing DMOs in a range of chronic conditions. Qualitative and quantitative analysis considering steps per day and gait speed and their association with clinical outcomes in COPD patients was performed. RESULTS 21 studies (6076 participants) were included. Nine studies evaluated steps per day and 11 evaluated a measure reflecting gait speed in daily life. Negative associations were demonstrated between mortality risk and steps per day (per 1000 steps) (hazard ratio (HR) 0.81, 95% CI 0.75-0.88, p<0.001), gait speed (<0.80 m·s-1) (HR 3.55, 95% CI 1.72-7.36, p<0.001) and gait speed (per 1.0 m·s-1) (HR 7.55, 95% CI 1.11-51.3, p=0.04). Fewer steps per day (per 1000) and slow gait speed (<0.80 m·s-1) were also associated with increased healthcare utilisation (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.72-0.88, p<0.001; OR 3.36, 95% CI 1.42-7.94, p=0.01, respectively). Available evidence was of low-moderate quality with few studies eligible for meta-analysis. CONCLUSION Daily step count and gait speed are negatively associated with mortality risk and other important outcomes in people with COPD and therefore may have value as prognostic indicators in clinical trials, but the quantity and quality of evidence is limited. Larger studies with consistent methodologies are called for.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara C Buttery
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Parris J Williams
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Saeed M Alghamdi
- Clinical Technology Department, Respiratory Care Program, Faculty of Applied Medical Science, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Keir E J Philip
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Alexis Perkins
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, London, UK
| | | | - Jennifer K Quint
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Michael I Polkey
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Sofie Breuls
- KU Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Respiratory Division, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Joren Buekers
- ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nikolaos Chynkiamis
- Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Laura Delgado-Ortiz
- ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Heleen Demeyer
- KU Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Respiratory Division, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Anja Frei
- Thorax Research Foundation and First Dept. of Respiratory Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sotiria General Chest Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Judith Garcia-Aymerich
- ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Elena Gimeno-Santos
- ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sarah Koch
- ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Dimitrios Megaritis
- Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ashley Polhemus
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thierry Troosters
- KU Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Respiratory Division, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Ioannis Vogiatzis
- Thorax Research Foundation and First Dept. of Respiratory Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Sotiria General Chest Hospital, Athens, Greece
- Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Henrik Watz
- Pulmonary Research Institute at Lungen Clinic Grosshansdorf, Airway Research Center North (ARCN), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Grosshansdorf, Germany
| | - Nicholas S Hopkinson
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Polhemus A, Delgado-Ortiz L, Brittain G, Chynkiamis N, Salis F, Gaßner H, Gross M, Kirk C, Rossanigo R, Taraldsen K, Balta D, Breuls S, Buttery S, Cardenas G, Endress C, Gugenhan J, Keogh A, Kluge F, Koch S, Micó-Amigo ME, Nerz C, Sieber C, Williams P, Bergquist R, Bosch de Basea M, Buckley E, Hansen C, Mikolaizak AS, Schwickert L, Scott K, Stallforth S, van Uem J, Vereijken B, Cereatti A, Demeyer H, Hopkinson N, Maetzler W, Troosters T, Vogiatzis I, Yarnall A, Becker C, Garcia-Aymerich J, Leocani L, Mazzà C, Rochester L, Sharrack B, Frei A, Puhan M. Walking on common ground: a cross-disciplinary scoping review on the clinical utility of digital mobility outcomes. NPJ Digit Med 2021; 4:149. [PMID: 34650191 PMCID: PMC8516969 DOI: 10.1038/s41746-021-00513-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Physical mobility is essential to health, and patients often rate it as a high-priority clinical outcome. Digital mobility outcomes (DMOs), such as real-world gait speed or step count, show promise as clinical measures in many medical conditions. However, current research is nascent and fragmented by discipline. This scoping review maps existing evidence on the clinical utility of DMOs, identifying commonalities across traditional disciplinary divides. In November 2019, 11 databases were searched for records investigating the validity and responsiveness of 34 DMOs in four diverse medical conditions (Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hip fracture). Searches yielded 19,672 unique records. After screening, 855 records representing 775 studies were included and charted in systematic maps. Studies frequently investigated gait speed (70.4% of studies), step length (30.7%), cadence (21.4%), and daily step count (20.7%). They studied differences between healthy and pathological gait (36.4%), associations between DMOs and clinical measures (48.8%) or outcomes (4.3%), and responsiveness to interventions (26.8%). Gait speed, step length, cadence, step time and step count exhibited consistent evidence of validity and responsiveness in multiple conditions, although the evidence was inconsistent or lacking for other DMOs. If DMOs are to be adopted as mainstream tools, further work is needed to establish their predictive validity, responsiveness, and ecological validity. Cross-disciplinary efforts to align methodology and validate DMOs may facilitate their adoption into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Polhemus
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Laura Delgado-Ortiz
- ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gavin Brittain
- Department of Neuroscience and Sheffield NIHR Translational Neuroscience BRC, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust & University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England
| | - Nikolaos Chynkiamis
- Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University Newcastle, Newcastle, UK
| | - Francesca Salis
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Heiko Gaßner
- Department of Molecular Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michaela Gross
- Department of Clinical Gerontology, Robert-Bosch-Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Cameron Kirk
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Rachele Rossanigo
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Kristin Taraldsen
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Diletta Balta
- Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Sofie Breuls
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Respiratory Diseases, University hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sara Buttery
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Gabriela Cardenas
- ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Christoph Endress
- Department of Clinical Gerontology, Robert-Bosch-Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Julia Gugenhan
- Department of Clinical Gerontology, Robert-Bosch-Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Alison Keogh
- Insight Centre for Data Analytics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Felix Kluge
- Department of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sarah Koch
- ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Encarna Micó-Amigo
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Corinna Nerz
- Department of Clinical Gerontology, Robert-Bosch-Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Chloé Sieber
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Parris Williams
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ronny Bergquist
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Magda Bosch de Basea
- ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ellen Buckley
- Insigneo Institute, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Clint Hansen
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | | | - Lars Schwickert
- Department of Clinical Gerontology, Robert-Bosch-Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Kirsty Scott
- Insigneo Institute, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Sabine Stallforth
- Department of Molecular Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Janet van Uem
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Beatrix Vereijken
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Andrea Cereatti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
- Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Heleen Demeyer
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Respiratory Diseases, University hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Walter Maetzler
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Thierry Troosters
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Respiratory Diseases, University hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ioannis Vogiatzis
- Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University Newcastle, Newcastle, UK
| | - Alison Yarnall
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Clemens Becker
- Department of Clinical Gerontology, Robert-Bosch-Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Judith Garcia-Aymerich
- ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Letizia Leocani
- Department of Neurology, San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudia Mazzà
- Insigneo Institute, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Lynn Rochester
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Basil Sharrack
- Department of Neuroscience and Sheffield NIHR Translational Neuroscience BRC, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust & University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England
| | - Anja Frei
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Milo Puhan
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Burge AT, Cox NS, Abramson MJ, Holland AE. Interventions for promoting physical activity in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 4:CD012626. [PMID: 32297320 PMCID: PMC7160071 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012626.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Escalating awareness of the magnitude of the challenge posed by low levels of physical activity in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) highlights the need for interventions to increase physical activity participation. The widely-accepted benefits of physical activity, coupled with the increasing availability of wearable monitoring devices to objectively measure participation, has led to a dramatic rise in the number and variety of studies that aimed to improve the physical activity of people with COPD. However, little was known about the relative efficacy of interventions tested so far. OBJECTIVES In people with COPD, which interventions are effective at improving objectively-assessed physical activity? SEARCH METHODS We identified trials from the Cochrane Airways Trials Register Register, which contains records identified from bibliographic databases including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, AMED, and PsycINFO. We also searched PEDro, ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform portal and the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (from inception to June 2019). We checked reference lists of all primary studies and review articles for additional references, as well as respiratory journals and respiratory meeting abstracts, to identify relevant studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials of interventions that used objective measures for the assessment of physical activity in people with COPD. Trials compared an intervention with no intervention or a sham/placebo intervention, an intervention in addition to another standard intervention common to both groups, or two different interventions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methods recommended by Cochrane. Subgroup analyses were possible for supervised compared to unsupervised pulmonary rehabilitation programmes in clinically-stable COPD for a range of physical activity outcomes. Secondary outcomes were health-related quality of life, exercise capacity, adverse events and adherence. Insufficient data were available to perform prespecified subgroup analyses by duration of intervention or disease severity. We undertook sensitivity analyses by removing studies that were at high or unclear risk of bias for the domains of blinding and incomplete outcome data. MAIN RESULTS We included 76 studies with 8018 participants. Most studies were funded by government bodies, although some were sponsored by equipment or drug manufacturers. Only 38 studies had physical activity as a primary outcome. A diverse range of interventions have been assessed, primarily in single studies, but improvements have not been systematically demonstrated following any particular interventions. Where improvements were demonstrated, results were confined to single studies, or data for maintained improvement were not provided. Step count was the most frequently reported outcome, but it was commonly assessed using devices with documented inaccuracy for this variable. Compared to no intervention, the mean difference (MD) in time in moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA) following pulmonary rehabilitation was four minutes per day (95% confidence interval (CI) -2 to 9; 3 studies, 190 participants; low-certainty evidence). An improvement was demonstrated following high-intensity interval exercise training (6 minutes per day, 95% CI 4 to 8; 2 studies, 275 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). One study demonstrated an improvement following six months of physical activity counselling (MD 11 minutes per day, 95% CI 7 to 15; 1 study, 280 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), but we found mixed results for the addition of physical activity counselling to pulmonary rehabilitation. There was an improvement following three to four weeks of pharmacological treatment with long-acting muscarinic antagonist and long-acting beta2-agonist (LAMA/LABA) compared to placebo (MD 10 minutes per day, 95% CI 4 to 15; 2 studies, 423 participants; high-certainty evidence). These interventions also demonstrated improvements in other measures of physical activity. Other interventions included self-management strategies, nutritional supplementation, supplemental oxygen, endobronchial valve surgery, non-invasive ventilation, neuromuscular electrical stimulation and inspiratory muscle training. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS A diverse range of interventions have been assessed, primarily in single studies. Improvements in physical activity have not been systematically demonstrated following any particular intervention. There was limited evidence for improvement in physical activity with strategies including exercise training, physical activity counselling and pharmacological management. The optimal timing, components, duration and models for interventions are still unclear. Assessment of quality was limited by a lack of methodological detail. There was scant evidence for a continued effect over time following completion of interventions, a likely requirement for meaningful health benefits for people with COPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela T Burge
- La Trobe UniversityDepartment of Physiotherapy, Podiatry and Prosthetics and Orthotics, School of Allied Health, Human Services and SportMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Institute for Breathing and SleepMelbourneAustralia
- Alfred HealthPhysiotherapyPO Box 315MelbourneAustraliaPrahran VIC 3181
- Monash UniversityDepartment of Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Respiratory MedicineMelbourneAustralia
| | - Narelle S Cox
- Institute for Breathing and SleepMelbourneAustralia
- Monash UniversityDepartment of Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Respiratory MedicineMelbourneAustralia
- School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe UniversityDepartment of Physiotherapy, Podiatry and Prosthetics and OrthoticsMelbourneVictoriaAustralia3004
| | - Michael J Abramson
- Monash UniversitySchool of Public Health & Preventive MedicineMelbourneVictoriaAustralia3004
| | - Anne E Holland
- La Trobe UniversityDepartment of Physiotherapy, Podiatry and Prosthetics and Orthotics, School of Allied Health, Human Services and SportMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Institute for Breathing and SleepMelbourneAustralia
- Alfred HealthPhysiotherapyPO Box 315MelbourneAustraliaPrahran VIC 3181
- Monash UniversityDepartment of Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Respiratory MedicineMelbourneAustralia
| | | |
Collapse
|