Lyme-associated uveitis: Clinical spectrum and review of literature

Etiological Diagnosis of Uveitis: Contribution of the of the Extra-Ophthalmological Clinical Examination

PURPOSE

Determining uveitis etiology is a challenge. It is based primarily on demographic data and the characteristics of eye examination. It is not clear to what extent extraocular physical signs contribute to elucidating the etiology. This study aimed to establish the contribution of the clinical extra-ophthalmological features for the assessment of the underlying etiology of uveitis.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 1307 patients with uveitis referred to our tertiary center between 2003 and 2021. Uveitis was classified according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature. Clinical features were collected at diagnosis by internists before the etiological diagnosis was made. The main outcome description was the contribution of clinical features.

RESULTS

Clinical extra-ophthalmological features contributed to the assessment of the underlying etiology of uveitis in 363 (27.8%) patients. The joint and the skin examinations were the most useful for etiological investigations, respectively in 12.3% and 11.8% of patients. Five etiologies of uveitis accounted for 80% of the cases: sarcoidosis, HLA-B27-related uveitis, Behçet's disease, multiple sclerosis, and Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease. Clinical extra-ophthalmological features were particularly important in the etiological diagnosis of acute bilateral anterior uveitis and panuveitis.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that clinical extra-ophthalmological features are essential for the etiological diagnosis of uveitis in more than a quarter of patients. It demonstrates once again the value of collaboration between ophthalmologists and other specialists experienced in performing extra-ophthalmological clinical examinations, particularly in patients with acute bilateral anterior uveitis and panuveitis.

A Case of Lyme Disease Presenting as Bilateral Panuveitis

Here, we describe a case of Lyme disease presenting as bilateral panuveitis. A 25-year-old woman presented to our clinic with decreased visual acuity of 20/320 and 20/160 in the right and left eye, respectively. An ophthalmic examination revealed the presence of anterior chamber cells 3+, vitreous cells 1+, vitreous haziness 2+/1+, and retinal infiltration in both eyes. She also had fever, headache, and difficulty in breathing. An initial blood analysis did not detect infection; however, high levels of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein were noted. Pleural and pericardial effusions, and multiple reactive arthritis lesions were observed on chest computed tomography and bone scans, respectively. Oral steroids (30 mg/day) and steroid eye drops were initiated. Ten days later, she was diagnosed with Lyme disease, based on an indirect immunofluorescence antibody test. Ceftriaxone (2 g) was intravenously administered for 2 weeks followed by administration of oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (400 mg/80 mg/day) for 1 week. Thereafter, she received a 4-week course of doxycycline (100 mg) twice daily. Her symptoms and ocular findings improved; however, a gradually increasing dose of oral steroid was needed to control retinal lesions for some time, since multiple retinitis lesions developed in the peripheral retina after tapering the oral steroid dose to 5 mg/day. In conclusion, panuveitis can occur in patients with Lyme disease and can be treated with systemic antibiotics and steroids.

When and which second-line workup to perform for uveitis: a tertiary care center experience

OBJECTIVE

Uveitis are inflammatory disorders of various etiologies. The first-line etiological workup is currently poorly codified, and some patients undergo sequential investigations. However, what leads the clinician to perform subsequent exams and the relevance of such exams remain to be determined. The main objective of the study was to evaluate the relevance and modalities of a second-line workup of patients with uveitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a monocentric retrospective study in Nancy University Hospital. All adult patients who underwent an etiological workup in the Internal Medicine Department between January 2014 and December 2021 were included.

RESULTS

Among the 247 patients included, 52 underwent a second-line workup, resulting in a modified diagnosis for 18 of them (34.6%), mainly sarcoidosis, intraocular lymphoma, and Crohn's disease. On multivariate analysis, a follow-up longer than 40 months and idiopathic uveitis were associated with the realization of a second-line workup (OR = 2.97 [1.58 - 5.61]; p = 0.001, and OR = 6.13 [2.3-16.1]; p < 0.01, respectively). The presence of synechia and ocular granuloma were associated with a modification of the diagnosis (OR = 8.03 [1.85-45.48]; p = 0.01, and OR = 5.14 [1.22-24.78]; p = 0.03, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The second-line workup is relevant in up to one-third of patients, mainly if presenting with a modification of ophthalmological examination, synechiae, and a granulomatous feature, and should focus on intraocular lymphoma, sarcoidosis, and Crohn's disease. Larger studies are needed to provide guidelines for second-line workup.

Cranial nerve involvement, visual complications and headache syndromes in Lyme disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide a summary of the visual manifestations and cranial neuropathies seen in Lyme disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Lyme facial palsy remains the most common manifestation of Lyme neuroborreliosis. Recent investigations show likely evidence of vagal involvement in Lyme disease.

SUMMARY

The literature on Lyme neuroborreliosis continues to evolve. Lyme disease can affect nearly any cranial nerve in addition to causing various headache syndromes. The most common manifestation is Lyme disease facial palsy, occurring in up to 5-10% of patients with documented Lyme disease. Headache syndromes are common in the context of facial palsy but can occur in isolation, and more specific headache syndromes including trigeminal and geniculate neuralgias can occur rarely. Signs and symptoms indicative of vestibulocochlear nerve involvement are relatively common, although it could be that these represent other vestibular involvement rather than a specific cranial neuropathy. Optic neuritis is a controversial entity within Lyme disease and is likely overdiagnosed, but convincing cases do exist. Physicians who see any cranial neuropathy, including optic neuritis, in an endemic area can consider Lyme disease as a possible cause.

Yearly Occurrence and Seasonality of Neuro-ophthalmic Manifestations of Pediatric Lyme Disease

PURPOSE

To review the neuro-ophthalmic manifestations of Lyme disease at a central Ohio pediatric tertiary care center.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patients diagnosed as having Lyme disease from September 2015 to September 2020 was completed. Demographic information, diagnosis dates, and manifestations of Lyme disease were recorded. Patients were excluded for age older than 18 years or lack of corroborated Lyme disease diagnosis. Descriptive statistics were performed.

RESULTS

Of the 212 cases of pediatric Lyme disease reviewed, 50 patients had neuroborreliosis. The data showed an increase in Lyme disease and neuroborreliosis cases from 2018 to 2020, with a preponderance of diagnoses in the summer months. Twenty-four patients had meningitis, and 6 of these patients (25%) were diagnosed as having bilateral optic disc edema that was clinically consistent with intracranial hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

Papilledema in the setting of Lyme meningitis may be more common than previously reported in central Ohio. If Lyme disease meningitis is suspected, an opening pressure should be recorded at the time of lumbar puncture and, if elevated, an ophthalmologic evaluation for optic nerve edema is indicated. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2024;61(3):179-182.].

Co-infectious Uveitis With Syphilis and Lyme Disease: A Case Report

Uveitis is the inflammation of the uveal tract (i.e., iris, ciliary body, and choroid). Uveitis is categorized into the following three types based on the anatomical location of inflammation: anterior, intermediate, and posterior uveitis. Severe cases may lead to panuveitis, where all three layers may become inflamed potentially resulting in permanent vision loss. Uveitis can arise from different underlying disorders, including infectious causes or autoimmune disorders. Syphilis and Lyme disease are uncommon causes of uveitis. Eye involvement can occur at any stage in Lyme disease, characterized by diverse manifestations such as conjunctivitis, episcleritis, keratitis, uveitis, neuroretinitis, and retinal vasculitis. Patients may present with symptoms of blurred vision, eye pain or discomfort, visual floaters, headache, or intolerance to light. Patients can risk vision loss if not diagnosed and treated promptly.

HLA-B27-positive anterior uveitis : Clinical aspects, diagnostics, interdisciplinary management, and treatment

Acute anterior uveitis (AAU) associated with human leukocyte antigen (HLA) B27 is the most common form of noninfectious intraocular inflammation and is considered to be a separate clinical entity. Young adults between the ages of 20 and 40 years are predominantly affected. The HLA-B27 positive AAU typically presents as a unilateral, fulminant disruption of the blood-aqueous humor barrier, which is accompanied by pronounced cellular infiltration and fibrinous exudation. Other characteristics are reduced intraocular pressure and a high tendency to relapse, which can also involve the partner eye. Patients with HLA-B27 positive AAU share a high risk for other genetically associated diseases, especially spondylarthritis, chronic inflammatory bowel diseases and psoriasis. As up to 40% of those affected have a systemic disease that has not yet been diagnosed, the ophthalmologist is of major importance for early detection.

Multimodal imaging for the management of Lyme-associated uveitis: A case report from an Italian tertiary center

INTRODUCTION

Lyme borreliosis may present with different systemic manifestations and also the ocular involvement may be difficult to diagnose because of its multifaceted presentation. Considering the growing incidence of Lyme disease in European countries, ophthalmologist should be trained to distinguish ocular borreliosis.

CASE REPORT

Several clinical presentations have been previously described, including uveitis, unilateral or bilateral chorioretinitis, keratitis, episcleritis, papillitis and ischemic optic neuropathy, retinal vasculitis and acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy (APMPPE); however our case report showed a rare presentation with the presence of unilateral uveitis with vitreitis and multiple, patchy, yellowish lesions, in association with retinal vasculitis. This clinical picture was to be considered in differential diagnosis with ocular Toxoplasmosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The appropriate management of this patient was made possible by the combination of multimodal imaging and appropriate laboratory tests, representing the optimal process in the diagnostic and therapeutic pathway in high-risk patients for ocular Lyme disease.

[HLA-B27 positive anterior uveitis : Clinical aspects, diagnostics, interdisciplinary management and treatment]

Acute anterior uveitis (AAU) associated with human leukocyte antigen (HLA) B27 is the most common form of noninfectious intraocular inflammation and is considered to be a separate clinical entity. Young adults between the ages of 20 and 40 years are predominantly affected. The HLA-B27 positive AAU typically presents as a unilateral, fulminant disruption of the blood-aqueous humor barrier, which is accompanied by pronounced cellular infiltration and fibrinous exudation. Other characteristics are reduced intraocular pressure and a high tendency to relapse, which can also involve the partner eye. Patients with HLA-B27 positive AAU share a high risk for other genetically associated diseases, especially spondylarthritis, chronic inflammatory bowel diseases and psoriasis. As up to 40% of those affected have a systemic disease that has not yet been diagnosed, the ophthalmologist is of major importance for early detection.

Clinical Features and Multimodal Imaging in Atypical Posterior Uveitis Secondary to Bartonella Henselae Infection

PURPOSE

To characterize an unusual presentation of infectious posterior uveitis using multimodal imaging, and discuss the clinical decision-making involved in diagnosis and treatment.

METHODS

Wide-field fundus photography, swept-source optical coherence tomography (OCT), swept-source OCT angiography, fluorescein angiography, and indocyanine green angiography.

RESULTS

This patient presented with cyclical fevers and blurry vision. Fundus examination revealed bilateral optic disc edema, macular intraretinal white spots and many scattered yellow-white chorioretinal lesions. Multimodal imaging characteristics suggested that many of these lesions represent choroidal granulomas. Extensive systemic workup was only notable for borderline elevated Bartonella henselae IgG titers (1:128), however convalescent IgG titers were elevated at 38 days (1:512) supporting the diagnosis of Bartonella chorioretinitis.

CONCLUSION

Ocular manifestations of Bartonella henselae infection are varied and may include choroidal granulomas. Multimodal imaging characteristics may help identify etiologies of infectious uveitis. Convalescent titers are important when evaluating patients with suspected Bartonellosis, especially patients with atypical presentations.

Intermediate Uveitis: A Review

PURPOSE

This review aims to provide an update on the clinical presentation, etiologies, complications, and treatment options in intermediate uveitis (IU).

METHODS

Narrative literature review.

RESULTS

IU affects all age groups with no clear gender predominance and has varied etiologies including systemic illnesses and infectious diseases, or pars planitis. In some instances, IU may be the sole presentation of an underlying associated condition or disease. Management of IU and its complications include administration of corticosteroids, antimetabolites, T-cell inhibitors, and/or biologics, along with surgical interventions, with varying degrees of effectiveness across literature. In particular, increasing evidence of the safety and efficacy of immunomodulatory agents and biologics has seen greater adoption of these therapies in clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

IU is an anatomical description of uveitis, involving intraocular inflammation of the vitreous, peripheral retinal vasculature, and pars plana. Various treatment options for intermediate uveitis are currently used in practice.

Pediatric uveitis: Role of the pediatrician

The challenges of childhood uveitis lie in the varied spectrum of its clinical presentation, the often asymptomatic nature of disease, and the evolving nature of the phenotype alongside normal physiological development. These issues can lead to delayed diagnosis which can cause significant morbidity and severe visual impairment. The most common ocular complications include cataracts, band keratopathy, glaucoma, and macular oedema, and the various associated systemic disorders can also result in extra-ophthalmic morbidity. Pediatricians have an important role to play. Their awareness of the various presentations and etiologies of uveitis in children afford the opportunity of prompt diagnosis before complications arise. Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) is one of the most common associated disorders seen in childhood uveitis, but there is a need to recognize other causes. In this review, different causes of uveitis are explored, including infections, autoimmune and autoinflammatory disease. As treatment is often informed by etiology, pediatricians can ensure early ophthalmological referral for children with inflammatory disease at risk of uveitis and can support management decisions for children with uveitis and possible underling multi-system inflammatory disease, thus reducing the risk of the development of irreversible sequelae.

Update on the Management of Uveitic Macular Edema

Uveitic macular edema (ME) is a frequent complication in 8.3% of uveitis patients and is a leading cause of serious visual impairment in about 40% of cases. Despite the numerous available drugs for its treatment, at least a third of patients fail to achieve satisfactory improvement in visual acuity. First-line drugs are steroids administered by various routes, but drug intolerance or ineffectiveness occur frequently, requiring the addition of other groups of therapeutic drugs. Immunomodulatory and biological drugs can have positive effects on inflammation and often on the accompanying ME, but most uveitic randomized clinical trials to date have not aimed to reduce ME; hence, there is no clear scientific evidence of their effectiveness in this regard. Before starting therapy to reduce general or local immunity, infectious causes of inflammation should be ruled out. This paper discusses local and systemic drugs, including steroids, biological drugs, immunomodulators, VEGF inhibitors, and anti-infection medication.

Differential Diagnosis of Vitritis in Adult Patients

The term "vitritis" refers to the presence of a cellular infiltration of the vitreous body, usually in the context of an intraocular inflammation, but not exclusively. Intermediate uveitis is the most prominent cause of vitritis, including infectious and auto-immune/auto-inflammatory etiologies. Corticosteroids and immunosuppressive therapies should not be started before ruling out the infectious causes of vitritis, especially in immunosuppressed individuals. Other situations can mimic intermediate uveitis such as amyloidosis and ocular tumors. Primary intraocular lymphoma should always be suspected in case of vitreous infiltrations in individuals aged over 50 years.

Recurrent bilateral chorioretinitis with positive Lyme serology: a case report

Background

It has been disputed whether Lyme is a true causative agent in posterior uveitis or an incidental finding.

Case presentation

This report presents a case of a 33-year-old Caucasian female with a remote history of Lyme disease who presented with blurry vision in the right eye. Exam and imaging revealed a right active chorioretinitis and positive Lyme serology. The patient was systemically treated with prednisone and antibiotics. Symptoms initially improved, but she later developed a localized choriocapillaritis in the left eye. Steroids and antibiotics were restarted many times with fluctuating course of the disease. The patient was then started on chronic steroid-sparing immunosuppression, which has controlled the condition without recurrence.

Conclusions

The current report presents a unique case of recurrent bilateral chorioretinitis with positive Lyme serology and raises the question of the existence of true Lyme-associated uveitis.

[Anterior Uveitis: Clinic, Diagnostic Procedure and Treatment Options]

Anterior uveitis involves inflammation of the iris and/or ciliary body and is the most common intraocular inflammation in ophthalmological practice. It can be attributed to an infectious or immune-mediated genesis or be associated with systemic diseases. Anamnesis and (guiding) findings during the slit lamp examination often already provide important information on pathogenesis and thus on further diagnostic clarification and therapy. This includes the assessment of laterality, acute or chronic course of the disease and morphological criteria (granulomatous/non-granulomatous). The guideline-compliant procedure recommends further diagnosis with targeted laboratory diagnostics and, if necessary, consultative examinations if the disease recurs. This is important in order to pursue a targeted treatment approach and to recognize comorbidities.

A Pyrrhic Victory: The PMN Response to Ocular Bacterial Infections

Some tissues of the eye are susceptible to damage due to their exposure to the outside environment and inability to regenerate. Immune privilege, although beneficial to the eye in terms of homeostasis and protection, can be harmful when breached or when an aberrant response occurs in the face of challenge. In this review, we highlight the role of the PMN (polymorphonuclear leukocyte) in different bacterial ocular infections that invade the immune privileged eye at the anterior and posterior segments: keratitis, conjunctivitis, uveitis, and endophthalmitis. Interestingly, the PMN response from the host seems to be necessary for pathogen clearance in ocular disease, but the inflammatory response can also be detrimental to vision retention. This "Pyrrhic Victory" scenario is explored in each type of ocular infection, with details on PMN recruitment and response at the site of ocular infection. In addition, we emphasize the differences in PMN responses between each ocular disease and its most common corresponding bacterial pathogen. The in vitro and animal models used to identify PMN responses, such as recruitment, phagocytosis, degranulation, and NETosis, are also outlined in each ocular infection. This detailed study of the ocular acute immune response to infection could provide novel therapeutic strategies for blinding diseases, provide more general information on ocular PMN responses, and reveal areas of bacterial ocular infection research that lack PMN response studies.