A modeling-based narrative intervention to promote timely care-seeking in patients with acute myocardial infarction: A pilot randomized controlled trial and feasibility analysis

Perception and appropriation of a web-based recovery narratives intervention: qualitative interview study

Introduction

Mental health recovery narratives are widely available to the public, and can benefit people affected by mental health problems. The NEON Intervention is a novel web-based digital health intervention providing access to the NEON Collection of recovery narratives. The NEON Intervention was found to be effective and cost-effective in the NEON-O Trial for people with nonpsychosis mental health problems (ISRCTN63197153), and has also been evaluated in the NEON Trial for people with psychosis experience (ISRCTN11152837). We aimed to document NEON Intervention experiences, through an integrated process evaluation.

Methods

Analysis of interviews with a purposive sample of intervention arm participants who had completed trial participation.

Results

We interviewed 34 NEON Trial and 20 NEON-O Trial participants (mean age 40.4 years). Some users accessed narratives through the NEON Intervention almost daily, whilst others used it infrequently or not at all. Motivations for trial participation included: exploring the NEON Intervention as an alternative or addition to existing mental health provision; searching for answers about mental health experiences; developing their practice as a mental health professional (for a subset who were mental health professionals); claiming payment vouchers. High users (10 + narrative accesses) described three forms of appropriation: distracting from difficult mental health experiences; providing an emotional boost; sustaining a sense of having a social support network. Most participants valued the scale of the NEON Collection (n = 659 narratives), but some found it overwhelming. Many felt they could describe the characteristics of a desired narrative that would benefit their mental health. Finding a narrative meeting their desires enhanced engagement, but not finding one reduced engagement. Narratives in the NEON Collection were perceived as authentic if they acknowledged the difficult reality of mental health experiences, appeared to describe real world experiences, and described mental health experiences similar to those of the participant.

Discussion

We present recommendations for digital health interventions incorporating collections of digital narratives: (1) make the scale and diversity of the collection visible; (2) provide delivery mechanisms that afford appropriation; (3) enable contributors to produce authentic narratives; (4) enable learning by healthcare professionals; (5) consider use to address loneliness.

Theory-based cognitive-narrative intervention versus didactic education for promoting prompt care-seeking for acute myocardial infarction: A multisite mixed-methods randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Prolonged delays by patients in making care-seeking decisions remain a significant obstacle to the effective management of acute myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the effects of a theory-based cognitive-narrative intervention with those of didactic education over a 24-month period on the participants' attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge regarding acute myocardial infarction, prehospital delay time, and the use of an ambulance. We also explored participants' engagement in the intervention.

DESIGN

This study adopted a sequential mixed-methods design comprising a multisite randomized controlled trial and a qualitative study.

METHODS

Community-dwelling adult patients with a prior history of acute myocardial infarction in the past year were recruited from four hospitals in Hong Kong. They were randomly assigned to an 8-week theory-based cognitive-narrative intervention that involved a vivid experience of complex decision-making or didactic education. The Acute Coronary Syndrome Response Index questionnaire was administered at baseline (T0) and at 3- (T1), 12- (T2), and 24-month (T3) follow-up time points. Prehospital delay time and the use of an ambulance were evaluated for those participants who had recurrent acute myocardial infarction attacks during the study period.

RESULTS

A total of 608 participants were randomly assigned to the theory-based cognitive-narrative intervention group (n = 304) or the didactic education group (n = 304). The intervention group reported greater improvements than the control group in their attitudes (β = -1.053, p = 0.002) and beliefs (β = -0.686, p = 0.041) regarding acute myocardial infarction and care-seeking at T1. These effects were sustained at T2 [attitudes (β = -0.797, p = 0.018); beliefs (β = -0.692, p = 0.047)] and T3 [attitudes (β = -0.717, p = 0.024); beliefs (β = -0.701, p = 0.032)]. Sixty-three participants experienced another acute myocardial infarction event by T2. The median delay times for the intervention and control groups were 3.13 h (interquartile range (IQR: 1.15-6.48)) and 4.82 h (IQR: 2.23-9.02), respectively. The prehospital delay time was significantly reduced in the intervention group compared with the control group (β = -0.07, p = 0.011). The qualitative findings echoed the quantitative findings, as participants indicated that the intervention helped them to understand the variable nature of the disease presentation, which enabled them to recognize the symptoms more readily.

CONCLUSION

The novel cognitive-narrative intervention used in this study effectively improved the participants' attitudes and beliefs regarding acute myocardial infarction and reduced the prehospital delay time.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered with the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform of the World Health Organization (ChiCTR-IIC-17010576) on February 2, 2017; the first participant was recruited on January 11, 2018.

Effects of a Narrative-Based Psychoeducational Intervention to Prepare Patients for Responding to Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Despite decades of educational efforts, patients' prolonged delays in seeking care for symptoms of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remain the greatest obstacle to successful management of the condition.

Objective

To compare the effects of a narrative-based psychoeducational intervention with a didactic educative approach on AMI survivors' intention to seek care for AMI symptoms and on AMI knowledge.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A multisite randomized clinical trial recruited community-dwelling patients aged 18 years or older with a history of AMI from 4 hospitals in Hong Kong from January 1, 2018, to January 22, 2021, and followed up participants for 1 year.

Interventions

An 8-week narrative-based psychoeducational intervention aimed to create a vivid cognitive experience of complex decision-making and modeled desirable behavioral changes through nurse-led, interactive video sessions using model patients. The control group received 4 nurse-led sessions comprising education about AMI and care seeking delivered using a didactic approach.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the behavioral intention between the 2 groups, reflected by participants' attitudes and beliefs about care seeking for AMI measured using the Acute Coronary Syndrome Response Index-Chinese version. The secondary outcome was AMI knowledge.

Results

Six hundred and eight participants (mean [SD] age, 67.2 [8.3] years; 469 [77.1%] male) were randomized to either the narrative-based psychoeducation group (n = 304) or the didactic education group (n = 304). The psychoeducational intervention group reported greater positive changes than the control group in their attitudes (β = -1.053 [95% CI, -1.714 to -0.391]; P < .001) and beliefs (β = -0.686 [95% CI, -1.354 to -0.180]; P = .04) toward care seeking at the 3-month follow-up, and the difference was sustained at 12 months for both attitudes (β = -0.797 [95% CI, -1.477 to -0.117]; P = .02) and beliefs (β = -0.692 [95% CI, -1.309 to -0.012]; P = .047). There were no significant differences in AMI knowledge between the 2 study groups at the 3-month and 12-month time points.

Conclusions and Relevance

The results of this randomized clinical trial found that a novel approach of narrative-based psychoeducation was effective in improving patients' behavioral intention to seek care for AMI symptoms. Longer-term follow-up to evaluate actual care-seeking behavior and clinical outcomes in patients with AMI is warranted to determine the sustained effects of this intervention.

Trial Registration

ChiCTR Identifier: ChiCTR-IIC-17010576.

The relationship between the living lab approach and successful implementation of healthcare innovations: an integrative review

OBJECTIVES

The concept of living labs as a research method to enhance participation of end-users in the development and implementation process of an innovation, gained increasing attention over the past decade. A living lab can be characterised by five key components: user-centric, cocreation, real-life context, test innovation and open innovation. The purpose of this integrative literature review was to summarise the literature on the relationship between the living lab approach and successful implementation of healthcare innovations.

METHODS

An integrative literature review searching PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO and Cinahl databases between January 2000 and December 2019. Studies were included when a living lab approach was used to implement innovations in healthcare and implementation outcomes were reported. Included studies evaluated at least one of the following implementation outcomes: acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity, implementation cost, penetration or sustainability. Quality was assessed based on a tool developed by Hawker et al.

RESULTS

Of the 1173 retrieved articles, 30 studies were included of which 11 of high quality. Most studies involved a combination of patients/public (N=23) and providers (N=17) as key stakeholders in the living lab approach. Living lab components were mostly applied in the development phase of innovations (N=21). The majority of studies reported on achievement of acceptability (N=22) and feasibility (N=17) in terms of implementation outcomes. A broader spectrum of implementation outcomes was only evaluated in one study. We found that in particular six success factors were mentioned for the added-value of using living lab components for healthcare innovations: leadership, involvement, timing, openness, organisational support and ownership.

CONCLUSIONS

The living lab approach showed to contribute to successful implementation outcomes. This integrative review suggests that using a living lab approach fosters collaboration and participation in the development and implementation of new healthcare innovations.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020166895.