Optimal glycaemic control in elderly people with type 2 diabetes: what does the evidence say?

The global prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is rising in an ageing population through a combination of lifestyle changes and greater longevity. However, by excluding participants aged over 70 years, most major interventional trials on which current diabetes therapeutic guidelines are based have failed to provide specific evidence to support the prescribed management of diabetes in elderly people. While diabetes per se has a significant impact on the elderly person, the side effects of medications, particularly hypoglycaemia, prevent optimisation of diabetes treatment. Hypoglycaemia is associated with significant morbidity, to which elderly people are often more vulnerable because of factors such as the effects of ageing, progressive renal impairment, frailty, polypharmacy and cognitive decline. T2DM is associated with accelerated cognitive decline in some individuals, and recurrent severe hypoglycaemia has been implicated as a potential contributory factor. Although the evidence for selection of appropriate glycaemic targets in elderly patients is sparse, it is now acknowledged that prevention of hypoglycaemia must influence individualisation of treatment goals in this vulnerable group. This should also be reflected by the choice of anti-diabetes agents that are initiated when diet and lifestyle advice is ineffective. Recently developed international guidelines, which have specifically addressed the management of diabetes in elderly people, highlight the importance of a pragmatic management approach rather than attempting to achieve a generic glycated haemoglobin goal and are summarised in this article.

Importance of Geriatric Syndromes in Older Patients with Diabetes with de novo Insulin Treatment: The VEGAS Study

Aims

The VEGAS study was conducted to evaluate representative data of de novo insulin-treated older patients with type 2 diabetes in the outpatient setting in Germany.

Methods

In this prospective, multicenter, non-interventional observational study, a nationwide written survey was carried out among practitioners (02/2011–06/2011). Older patients, aged ≥70 years, starting de novo insulin therapy, were documented.

Results

Data from 4,858 patients from about 500 centers (mean age: 78.2 ± 5.4 years; mean glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA_1c]: 70 ± 14.2 mmol/mol [8.6 ± 1.3 %]) were collected. The mean target HbA_1c value was 55 ± 6.6 mmol/mol (7.2 ± 0.6 %). 91.1 % of geriatric patients were multi-morbid. 96.2 % showed at least one physical or psychological geriatric syndrome. Most of the patients were notably impaired according to their age. Conventional insulin therapy and basal-supported oral therapy were the most frequently planned treatment regimens (39.1 and 31.1 %). Important factors in the selection of the insulin treatment regimen were an efficient HbA_1c decrease (65.6 %), easy administration (55.7 %), and also a patient’s ability to self-administer insulin (38.5 %). De novo insulin treatment increased care requirements (22.7 %). 22.3 % of the relatives were scheduled to receive special training. Specific training programs for older patients with diabetes were planned in only 7.3 % of cases.

Conclusions

The data demonstrate the high prevalence of geriatric syndromes during de novo insulin treatment. Individual therapeutic goals and regimes are based on practicability, in particular, the receipt of autonomy and the care requirement. Diabetes education with adapted programs is currently under-represented. Important factors for the choice of an insulin treatment regimen were an efficient HbA_1c decrease, easy administration, and a patient’s ability for self-administration.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40801-015-0014-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.