Kidney Graft Survival in Italy and Factors Influencing it

The Impact of Sex on Alloimmunity

Transplantation outcomes are known to be affected by multiple factors, including donor and recipient sex. Aside from the physiological characteristics of male and female donor allografts, accumulating evidence suggests that additional features underlie sex-specific immune responses that affect graft survival. We discuss here aspects of innate and adaptive alloimmunity that are specific to males and females in the context of underlying genetic and hormonal factors. These differences likely contribute to the observed disparities in graft survival. Understanding these features in more detail may lead to improved strategies for optimizing the results of organ transplantation.

Gender in the allocation of organs in kidney transplants: meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To analyze whether gender influence survival results of kidney transplant grafts and patients.

METHODS

Systematic review with meta-analysis of cohort studies available on Medline (PubMed), LILACS, CENTRAL, and Embase databases, including manual searching and in the grey literature. The selection of studies and the collection of data were conducted twice by independent reviewers, and disagreements were settled by a third reviewer. Graft and patient survival rates were evaluated as effectiveness measurements. Meta-analysis was conducted with the Review Manager^® 5.2 software, through the application of a random effects model. Recipient, donor, and donor-recipient gender comparisons were evaluated.

RESULTS

: Twenty-nine studies involving 765,753 patients were included. Regarding graft survival, those from male donors were observed to have longer survival rates as compared to the ones from female donors, only regarding a 10-year follow-up period. Comparison between recipient genders was not found to have significant differences on any evaluated follow-up periods. In the evaluation between donor-recipient genders, male donor-male recipient transplants were favored in a statistically significant way. No statistically significant differences were observed in regards to patient survival for gender comparisons in all follow-up periods evaluated.

CONCLUSIONS

The quantitative analysis of the studies suggests that donor or recipient genders, when evaluated isolatedly, do not influence patient or graft survival rates. However, the combination between donor-recipient genders may be a determining factor for graft survival.

The effect of donor-recipient gender mismatch on short- and long-term graft survival in kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is no limitation of gender matching in renal transplantation. This study was intended to evaluate its effect on short- and long-term graft survival.

METHODS

PubMed, the Web of Knowledge, Medline, the Cochrane Library, and two additional Chinese databases were searched. The data were then abstracted and meta-analyzed.

RESULTS

14 studies involving 445 279 patients were included. Each study reported data on the four gender matches (male donor-male recipient, MDMR; male donor-female recipient, MDFR; female donor-male recipient, FDMR; female donor-female recipient, FDFR). The pooled risk ratios (RRs) for 0.5-, 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-, and 10-yr graft survival rates showed that the FDMR group had the worst outcomes, and when recipients were female, short-term graft survival was worse, but long-term graft survival was better. The differences between groups changed with time.

CONCLUSIONS

FDMR patients showed poor graft survival. The female recipients had worse short-term graft survival but the best long-term graft survival. This study introduces an important consideration into donor-recipient matching in renal transplantation.