1
|
Miller JM, Zaun D, Wood NL, Lyden GR, McKinney WT, Hirose R, Snyder JJ. Adjusting for race in metrics of organ procurement organization performance. Am J Transplant 2024; 24:1440-1444. [PMID: 38331046 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.01.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/27/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients has previously reported the effects of adjusting for demographic variables, including race, in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) organ procurement organization (OPO) performance metrics: donation rate and transplant rate. CMS chose not to adjust for most demographic variables other than age (for the transplant rate), arguing that there is no biological reason that these variables would affect the organ donation/utilization decision. However, organ donation is a process based on altruism and trust, not a simple biological phenomenon. Focusing only on biological impacts on health ignores other pathways through which demographic factors can influence OPO outcomes. In this study, we update analyses of demographic adjustment on the OPO metrics for 2020 with a specific focus on adjusting for race. We find that adjusting for race would lead to 8 OPOs changing their CMS tier rankings, including 2 OPOs that actually overperform the national rate among non-White donors improving from a tier 3 ranking (facing decertification without possibility of recompeting) to a tier 2 ranking (allowing the possibility of recompeting). Incorporation of stratified and risk-adjusted metrics in public reporting of OPO performance could help OPOs identify areas for improvement within specific demographic categories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan M Miller
- Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Department of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
| | - David Zaun
- Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Nicholas L Wood
- Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Department of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Grace R Lyden
- Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Department of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Warren T McKinney
- Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Department of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ryutaro Hirose
- Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jon J Snyder
- Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Department of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Crawshaw J, Li AH, Garg AX, Chassé M, Grimshaw JM, Presseau J. Identifying behaviour change techniques within randomized trials of interventions promoting deceased organ donation registration. Br J Health Psychol 2021; 27:822-843. [PMID: 34889488 DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Revised: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Increasing deceased organ donation registration may increase the number of available organs for transplant to help save lives. This study aimed to identify which behaviour change techniques (BCTs; or 'active ingredients') are reported within randomized trials of interventions promoting deceased organ donation registration and of those, which are associated with a larger intervention effect. METHODS We conducted a secondary analysis of 45 trials included in a Cochrane systematic review of deceased organ donation registration interventions. Two researchers used the BCT Taxonomy v1 to independently code intervention content in all trial groups. Outcome data were pooled and we used meta-regression to explore associations between individual and combinations of recurring BCTs and effect on registration intention and/or registration behaviour. RESULTS A total of 27 different BCTs (mean = 3.7, range = 1-9) were identified in intervention groups across the 45 trials. The five most common BCTs were: 'Information about health consequences' (71%); 'Instruction on how to perform the behaviour' (47%); 'Salience of consequences' (40%); 'Adding objects to the environment' (28%); and 'Credible source' (27%). Comparator groups in 20/45 trials also included identifiable BCTs (n = 12, mean = 3.1, range = 1-7). Meta-regression revealed that a combination of the three most common BCTs was associated with a larger intervention effect size for registration behaviour (k = 8, β = .19, p = .02). CONCLUSIONS Trials of deceased organ donation registration interventions focus predominantly on providing information, instruction, and a means to register. While potentially effective, a much wider set of possible BCTs could be leveraged to address known barriers to registration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Crawshaw
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ontario, Canada.,School of Epidemiology & Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alvin H Li
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amit X Garg
- Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.,Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), London, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Nephrology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michaël Chassé
- Department of Medicine (Critical Care), University of Montreal Hospital, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jeremy M Grimshaw
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ontario, Canada.,School of Epidemiology & Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Justin Presseau
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ontario, Canada.,School of Epidemiology & Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ward S, Boger M, Fleishman A, Shenkel J, Calvo A, Pomahac B, Zwolak R, Krishnan N, Rodrigue JR. Attitudes Toward Organ, Tissue, and Vascularized Composite Allograft (VCA) Donation and Transplantation: A Survey of United States Military Veterans. Transplantation 2021; 105:1116-1124. [PMID: 32639399 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are 20 million living US armed forces veterans; however, the organ donation attitudes of veterans have not been examined. METHODS Over a 17-month period, a convenience sample of 1517 veterans in New England completed a survey to assess attitudes about organ, tissue, and vascularized composite allograft (VCA) donation. RESULTS Most veterans (96%) supported the donation of organs and tissue for transplantation, and 59% were registered as an organ and tissue donor. Being younger (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.960.970.98; P = 0.01), female (aOR: 1.061.462.03; P = 0.02), non-Hispanic white (aOR: 1.302.073.30; P = 0.01), Hispanic (aOR: 1.282.434.61; P = 0.01), and having more trust that the transplant process is fair and equal (aOR: 1.191.401.65; P = 0.01) were predictive of donor registration. Also, most veterans were willing to donate their face (57%), hands/arms (81%), legs (81%), penis (men: 61%), and uterus (women: 76%) at time of death; donation willingness was higher for upper and lower limbs than for face or genitourinary organs (P < 0.001). Those unwilling to donate VCA organs expressed concerns about identity loss, psychological discomfort of self and others, body integrity, funeral presentation, and religious beliefs. Most (54%) felt that VCA donation should require permission of legal next-of-kin at the time of one's death, even if the decedent was a registered donor. CONCLUSIONS There is a high level of support for organ, tissue, and VCA transplantation and donation among veterans, despite limited educational campaigns targeting this population. There is high potential among veterans to further increase donor registry enrollment and raise awareness about VCA benefits for severely injured service members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Ward
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - Aaron Fleishman
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Jessica Shenkel
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Amanda Calvo
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Bohdan Pomahac
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Robert Zwolak
- Department of Surgery, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Manchester, NH
- Department of Surgery, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, VT
| | - Namrata Krishnan
- Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, West Haven, CT
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - James R Rodrigue
- Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kernodle AB, Zhang W, Motter JD, Doby B, Liyanage L, Garonzik-Wang J, Jackson KR, Boyarsky BJ, Massie AB, Purnell TS, Segev DL. Examination of Racial and Ethnic Differences in Deceased Organ Donation Ratio Over Time in the US. JAMA Surg 2021; 156:e207083. [PMID: 33566079 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.7083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Importance Historically, deceased organ donation was lower among Black compared with White populations, motivating efforts to reduce racial disparities. The overarching effect of these efforts in Black and other racial/ethnic groups remains unclear. Objective To examine changes in deceased organ donation over time. Design, Setting, and Participants This population-based cohort study used data from January 1, 1999, through December 31, 2017, from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients to quantify the number of actual deceased organ donors, and from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research Detailed Mortality File to quantify the number of potential donors (individuals who died under conditions consistent with organ donation). Data were analyzed from December 2, 2019, to May 14, 2020. Exposures Race and ethnicity of deceased and potential donors. Main Outcomes and Measures For each racial/ethnic group and year, a donation ratio was calculated as the number of actual deceased donors divided by the number of potential donors. Direct age and sex standardization was used to allow for group comparisons, and Poisson regression was used to quantify changes in donation ratio over time. Results A total of 141 534 deceased donors and 5 268 200 potential donors were included in the analysis. Among Black individuals, the donation ratio increased 2.58-fold from 1999 to 2017 (yearly change in adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR], 1.05; 95% CI, 1.05-1.05; P < .001). This increase was significantly greater than the 1.60-fold increase seen in White individuals. Nevertheless, substantial racial differences remained, with Black individuals still donating at only 69% the rate of White individuals in 2017 (P < .001). Among other racial minority populations, changes were less drastic. Deceased organ donation increased 1.80-fold among American Indian/Alaska Native and 1.40-fold among Asian or Pacific Islander populations, with substantial racial differences remaining in 2017 (American Indian/Alaska Native population donation at 28% and Asian/Pacific Islander population donation at 85% the rate of the White population). Deceased organ donation differences between Hispanic/Latino and non-Hispanic/Latino populations increased over time (4% lower in 2017). Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this cohort study suggest that differences in deceased organ donation between White and some racial minority populations have attenuated over time. The greatest gains were observed among Black individuals, who have been the primary targets of study and intervention. Despite improvements, substantial differences remain, suggesting that novel approaches are needed to understand and address relatively lower rates of deceased organ donation among all racial minorities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amber B Kernodle
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Wanying Zhang
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jennifer D Motter
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Brianna Doby
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | | | - Kyle R Jackson
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Brian J Boyarsky
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Allan B Massie
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Tanjala S Purnell
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Dorry L Segev
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.,Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Li AH, Lo M, Crawshaw JE, Dunnett AJ, Naylor KL, Garg AX, Presseau J. Interventions for increasing solid organ donor registration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 4:CD10829. [PMID: 35608942 PMCID: PMC8164549 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010829.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A solution for increasing the number of available organs for transplantation is to encourage more individuals to register a commitment for deceased organ donation. However, the percentage of the population registered for organ donation remains low in many countries. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the benefits and harms of various interventions used to increase deceased organ donor registration. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 11 August 2020 through contact with an Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. SELECTION CRITERIA We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cluster RCTs and quasi-RCTs of interventions to promote deceased organ donor registration. We included studies if they measured self-reported or verified donor registration, intention to donate, intention to register a decision or number of individuals signing donor cards as outcomes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently assessed retrieved studies and extracted data from included studies. We assessed studies for risk of bias. We obtained summary estimates of effect using a random-effects model and expressed results as risk ratios (RR) (95% confidence intervals; CI) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD; 95% CI) or standardised mean difference (SMD; 95% CI) for continuous outcomes. In multi-arm trials, data were pooled to create single pair-wise comparisons. Analyses were stratified by specific intervention setting where available. MAIN RESULTS Our search strategy identified 46 studies (47 primary articles, including one abstract) comprising 24 parallel RCTs, 19 cluster RCTs and 3 quasi-RCTs. Sample sizes ranged from 138 to 1,085,292 (median = 514). A total of 16 studies measured registration behaviour, 27 measured intention to register/donate and three studies measured both registration behaviour and intention to register. Interventions were delivered in a variety of different settings: schools (14 studies), driver's motor vehicle (DMV) centres (5), mail-outs (4), primary care centres (3), workplaces (1), community settings (7) and general public (12). Interventions were highly varied in terms of their content and included strategies such as educational sessions and videos, leveraging peer leaders, staff training, message framing, and priming. Most studies were rated as having high or unclear risk of bias for random sequence generation and allocation concealment and low risk for the remainder of the domains. Data from 34/46 studies (74%) were available for meta-analysis. Low certainty evidence showed organ donation registration interventions had a small overall effect on improving registration behaviour (16 studies, 1,294,065 participants: RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.43, I2 = 84%), intention to register/donate (dichotomous) (10 studies, 10,838 participants: RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.42, I2 = 91%) and intention to register/donate (continuous) (9 studies, 3572 participants: SMD 0.23, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.36, I2 = 67%). Classroom-based interventions delivered in a lecture format by individuals from the transplant community may be effective at increasing intention to register/donate (3 studies, 675 participants: RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.55, I² = 0%). Community interventions targeting specific ethnic groups were generally effective at increasing registration rates (k = 5, n = 4186; RR 2.14, 95% CI 1.35 to 3.40, I² = 85%), although heterogeneity was high. In particular, interventions delivered in the community by trained peer-leaders appear to be effective (3 studies, 3819 participant: RR 2.09, 95% CI 1.08 to 4.06, I² = 87%), although again, the data lacked robustness. There was some evidence that framing messages (e.g. anticipated regret) and priming individuals (e.g. reciprocity) in a certain way may increase intention to register/donate, however, few studies measured this effect on actual registration. Overall, the studies varied significantly in terms of design, setting, content and delivery. Selection bias was evident and a quarter of the studies could not be included in the meta-analysis due to incomplete outcome data reporting. No adverse events were reported. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS In our review, we identified a variety of approaches used to increase organ donor registration including school-based educational sessions and videos, leveraging peer leaders in the community, DMV staff training, targeted messaging and priming. The variability in outcome measures used and incompleteness in reporting meant that most data could not be combined for analysis. When data were combined, overall effect sizes were small in favour of intervention groups over controls, however, there was significant variability in the data. There was some evidence that leveraging peer-leaders in the community to deliver organ donation education may improve registration rates and classroom-based education from credible individuals (i.e. members of the transplant community) may improve intention to register/donate, however, there is no clear evidence favouring any particular approach. There was mixed evidence for simple, low-intensity interventions utilising message framing and priming. However, it is likely that interest in these strategies will persist due to their reach and scalability. Further research is therefore required to adequately address the question of the most effective interventions for increasing deceased organ donor registration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alvin H Li
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Canada
| | - Marcus Lo
- London Health Sciences Centre, London, Canada
| | - Jacob E Crawshaw
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Alexie J Dunnett
- Department of Medicine - Nephrology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Canada
| | | | - Amit X Garg
- Department of Medicine, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Canada
| | - Justin Presseau
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Andrews AM, Zhang N, Smith AH, Loughery C, Resnicow K, Chapman R, Jenkins Riley H, Stav S, Yee J. A Clustered Randomized Trial Informing Patients on Dialysis About Their Ability to Donate Organs and Tissues. Prog Transplant 2020; 30:220-227. [PMID: 32567518 DOI: 10.1177/1526924820933840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The transplant waiting list exceeds the number of organs available. One means of increasing the organ pool is to broaden potential donors to include those with chronic diseases. RESEARCH QUESTIONS The study tested the effectiveness of using peer mentors to encourage individuals on dialysis to enroll on an organ donor registry. DESIGN Dialysis units were pair-matched by size and racial composition and then randomized to one of 2 interventions: meetings with a peer mentor (experimental intervention) or organ donation mailings (control). Peer mentors were trained to discuss organ donation with individuals on dialysis during in-person meetings at dialysis units. The primary outcome was verified registration in the state's donor registry. RESULTS After adjusting for age, gender, race, income, and education and accounting for correlation within the dialysis center, there was a significant intervention effect. Among individuals in the intervention group, the odds of enrolling (verified) on the donor registry were 2.52 times higher than those in the control group. DISCUSSION The use of peer mentors to discuss donating organs after death with individuals on dialysis can increase enrollment on a donor registry. Dispelling myths about chronic illness and donation can counter widely held misconceptions and help persons make an informed choice about end-of-life decisions and present an opportunity to increase the number of organs and tissues available for transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann M Andrews
- 456953National Kidney Foundation of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Nanhua Zhang
- Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, 2518Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, 2518University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | | | - Caitlin Loughery
- 456953National Kidney Foundation of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Ken Resnicow
- Department of Health Behavior & Health Education, 51329University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Remonia Chapman
- Gift of Life Michigan, Minority Organ and Tissue Transplant Education Program, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Sheri Stav
- Greenfield Health Systems, Bingham Farms, MI, USA
| | - Jerry Yee
- 2971Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Čož S, Kamin T. Systematic Literature Review of Interventions for Promoting Postmortem Organ Donation From Social Marketing Perspective. Prog Transplant 2020; 30:155-168. [DOI: 10.1177/1526924820913509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: This systematic review examines the factors that make some interventions promoting postmortem organ donation more successful and more likely to change behaviors than others. We analyzed the effectiveness of different types of interventions for promoting postmortem organ donation against the criteria identified by previous research in other health-related areas as the most important for designing effective behavior change programs. We observed a correlation between the use of social marketing benchmarks and the reported success of intervention goals. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of all articles describing interventions promoting postmortem organ donation published in scientific journals between January 2008 and November 2018. We analyzed these articles against the 7 social marketing benchmark criteria using a coding questioner. Findings: The analysis revealed a correlation between the use of social marketing benchmark criteria in an intervention’s design and the success of the intervention. Interventions that employed 6 or 7 criteria reported successful achievement of all intervention objectives. We observed a decrease in success rates when fewer than 6 social marketing benchmark criteria were included in the intervention design. Discussion: The findings suggest that a social marketing approach may prove useful to efforts to promote postmortem organ donation. More social marketing benchmark criteria should be included in the design and implementation of interventions promoting postmortem organ donation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sinja Čož
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Tanja Kamin
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|