Open surgery versus nonoperative treatments for paediatric trigger thumb: a systematic review

Paediatric trigger thumbs: patient-reported outcome measures over a minimum of ten years' follow-up

Aims

The paediatric trigger thumb is a distinct clinical entity with unique anatomical abnormalities. The aim of this study was to present the long-term outcomes of A1 pulley release in idiopathic paediatric trigger thumbs based on established patient-reported outcome measures.

Methods

This study was a cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study conducted at a tertiary care orthopaedic centre. All cases of idiopathic paediatric trigger thumbs which underwent A1 pulley release between 2004 and 2011 and had a minimum follow-up period of ten years were included in the study. The abbreviated version of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH) was administered as an online survey, and ipsi- and contralateral thumb motion was assessed.

Results

A total of 67 patients completed the survey, of whom 63 (94%) had full interphalangeal joint extension or hyperextension. Severe metacarpophalangeal joint hyperextension (> 40°) was documented in 15 cases (22%). The median QuickDASH score was 0 (0 to 61), indicating excellent function at a median follow-up of 15 years (10 to 19). Overall satisfaction was high, with 56 patients (84%) reporting the maximal satisfaction score of 5. Among 37 patients who underwent surgery at age ≤ two years, 34 (92%) reported the largest satisfaction, whereas this was the case for 22 of 30 patients (73%) with surgery at aged > two years (p = 0.053). Notta's nodule resolved in 49 patients (73%) at final follow-up. No residual triggering or revision surgery was observed.

Conclusion

Surgical release of A1 pulley in paediatric trigger thumb is an acceptable procedure with excellent functional long-term outcomes. There was a trend towards higher satisfaction with earlier surgery among the patients.

Trigger Thumb in Pediatric Patients: A 20-Year Update

BACKGROUND

The study purpose was to analyze the characteristics of patients presenting for evaluation of pediatric trigger thumb over a 20-year period and to determine what factors were associated with operative versus nonoperative management.

METHODS

All patients evaluated for a pediatric trigger thumb by 1 of 2 hand surgeons at our institution between January 1, 2000, and August 31, 2021, were retrospectively reviewed. Data were collected, including patient demographics, laterality, patient age and stage of triggering at presentation, treatment recommendations, age at surgery (if performed), and complications. Comparison was made based on age group (<2 years, 2-5 years, and >5 years). Subgroup analysis was performed for patients who had alternative treatments recommended prior to surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 381 patients (468 thumbs) were identified. The average age at presentation was 3.1 years, 76% were stage IV locked trigger thumbs, and 78% underwent surgery. Patients below 2 years were more likely to have bilateral involvement and have nonoperative management recommended prior to surgery. Those below 5 years were more likely to present with stage IV triggering. Patients who presented with a stage IV trigger thumb and had an initial alternative treatment were more likely to go on to have surgery. The total complication rate was 5.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings are helpful in counseling families and better understanding this patient population. We recommend early surgical intervention, rather than observation or splinting, for patients with stage IV trigger thumbs who can safely undergo anesthesia.

A Delayed Diagnosis of Bilateral Pediatric Trigger Thumbs: A Case Report and Literature Review

We describe the case of a 6-year-old female who presented with tender nodules and fixed flexion of her thumbs, diagnosed as bilateral pediatric trigger thumb. Though present since infancy, her condition was not diagnosed in prior clinical visits. Pediatric trigger digit is a clinical diagnosis, often missed if the digit's range of motion is not assessed routinely. Given the duration, pain, and severity of her condition, conservative management was deferred, and she was referred for surgery. An approach to clinical management is discussed. Ultimately, further study is required to develop structured management guidelines for pediatric trigger digit.

Trigger thumb treatment approach: Results of a survey of EPOS members

Purpose

The aim of this study is to analyze the clinical reality of pediatric trigger thumb among members of the European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society.

Methods

A 35-question survey was sent to all European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society members, focusing on surgeon's profile and experience, trigger thumb diagnostic and trigger thumb treatment approach. Descriptive statistics were performed.

Results

A total of 99 responses were analyzed. Most important factor considered in the therapeutic approach was the presence of a locked interphalangeal joint (52%). Regarding treatment, 41.4% opt for conservative approach as the first line of treatment, while 30.3% consider surgery and 28.3% just observe. Nevertheless, 76% mention to treat conservatively their patients and 99% to consider surgery at some stage. Regarding surgical technique, 96% do it open and 56% consider 2 years as the minimum age for procedure. Most surgeons perform this procedure in out-patient care (87%), don't administer prophylactic antibiotherapy (80%), use a tourniquet (75%), don't use any postoperative immobilization (64%), and report complications related to surgery (64%), mainly recurrence/incomplete division (59%) and superficial wound infection (30%).

Conclusion

Our study shows a significant variability in the initial management of pediatric trigger thumb with a predominance of conservative management, followed by surgery and observation without treatment. The disparity in treatment options and timing, or waiting times before moving on to different therapeutic options, shows us that this is a controversial issue and that the development of prospective randomized controlled studies is needed to analyze the different treatment methods and determine which ones give the best outcomes.

Trends in the Management of Pediatric Trigger Thumb in the United States

BACKGROUND

Recent literature suggests that initial observation of pediatric trigger thumb without early surgical interventions can lead to spontaneous resolution. We sought to analyze current trends in the management of pediatric trigger thumb and compare real-world data with what the literature supports.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of data collected using the PearlDiver database between 2015 and 2018. Patients who were aged younger than 10 years with a diagnosis of trigger thumb were identified using International Classification of Diseases codes. Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to identify patients who had an operation for trigger thumb. Patient demographics, comorbidities, utilization of hand therapy, and treatment cost were also collected.

RESULT

Of the 997 patients included in the study, 69% were diagnosed with trigger thumb between the age of 2 and 5 years. In all, 492 patients (49%) had surgery for trigger thumb: 65% of patients had surgery within 1 year of diagnosis, and 76% patients had surgery before the age of 5 years. This treatment pattern was similar across multiple regions of the United States, and there were no significant predictors for surgery. The average cost of treating patients without surgery was $593/patient, whereas that for patients with surgery was $1363/patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Nationwide data show that pediatric trigger thumb may be managed surgically at higher frequencies and in patients at younger ages than supported by the existing literature. Possible overtreatment is not only detrimental to patients but also burdens the health care system with unnecessary cost.

Open Release of Pediatric Trigger Thumb

Open release of a trigger thumb has been shown to be the most reliable option to restore full interphalangeal (IP) joint extension and thus normal thumb-joint motion in children¹. The aim of this procedure is to restore free gliding of the flexor pollicis longus (FPL) tendon in its canal in children with fixed IP joint flexion contractures or those in whom nonoperative treatment modalities have failed.

Description

The surgical procedure is easy to perform and straightforward; however, attention must be given to several details in order to avoid surgical failure and complications. General anesthesia is required for this procedure. The extremity is prepared and draped in a sterile fashion with the patient in the supine position, and a tourniquet is utilized to facilitate surgical dissection. A transverse incision is gently made just adjacent to the thumb metacarpophalangeal (MP) flexion crease, above the so-called Notta nodule. The ulnar neurovascular bundle is retracted to the side, and the Notta nodule, a local enlargement of the FPL tendon², is visualized at the A1 pulley. The pulley is incised longitudinally to allow for full IP joint extension. After verification of full passive motion, the tendon is inspected for any further abnormalities. Then, the tourniquet is released, and the wound is closed with absorbable sutures. We recommend the use of local anesthetics for postoperative pain control. In cases of a trigger thumb stuck in extension, full tenodesis flexion of the IP joint combined with smooth, full passive extension confirms a complete release.

Alternatives

Nonoperative treatment modalities mainly include watchful waiting for spontaneous resolution³, occupational therapy (i.e., passive exercising)^4,5, and splinting therapy⁶. However, prolonged stretching and splinting may move the nodule to a point distal to the stenotic pulley, thus resulting in a trigger thumb locked in extension with a loss of IP flexion. Alternative surgical treatment techniques involve percutaneous trigger thumb release or open release with alternative surgical approaches (e.g., an oblique or Brunner incision)^7,8.

Rationale

Several reports have shown that open release of a trigger thumb leads to the most reliable outcomes in terms of achievement of range of motion and complications^1,9,10. The main advantage of this procedure is the perfect visualization of the FPL tendon beneath the stenotic A1 pulley, which allows for a complete A1 release with clear vision. Such visualization cannot be provided with use of percutaneous techniques, which position the neurovascular bundle in potential danger for iatrogenic injury or may lead to incomplete pulley release⁸. Moreover, the use of this procedure allows parents to avoid the prolonged therapy and splinting associated with nonoperative treatment. Formal rehabilitation is usually not necessary postoperatively.

Expected Outcomes

Open release of a trigger thumb is a safe and reliable option that leads to full range of motion in 95% of children, which is substantially higher than for nonoperative treatment with therapy (55%) and splinting (67%)¹. Even delayed open release may provide satisfactory outcomes⁹. Although spontaneous resolution without surgery has been reported in 63% of cases³, patients with a flexion contracture of >30° showed spontaneous resolution in only 2.5% of cases¹⁰. Furthermore, the open surgical technique has been shown to have a lower rate of complications (around 3.4%)¹¹ compared with percutaneous techniques, which showed a 3.29 times increased risk of recurrence¹² and relevant injury to the neurovascular bundle⁸. If the A1 is fully divided, recurrence is highly unlikely. Postoperative rehabilitation is very quick following open release of a trigger thumb because closure under local anesthesia provides a painless postoperative course, wounds heal within a few days, and children are allowed to resume play immediately once a bandage is applied.

Important Tips

The use of surgical loupes is of paramount importance to safely perform this procedure.Place the skin incision adjacent but not directly onto the palmar MP flexion crease for better scar formation.Divide the skin very gently because the A1 pulley is located directly under the skin, and the FPL and radial nerve can be harmed easily. Retract the ulnar neurovascular bundle aside so as to allow for safe preparation until A1 division.Divide the A1 pulley until the Notta nodule on the FPL can safely glide distally into full IP extension. In some cases with large, distally-sitting nodules, the pulley incision must be extended distally into the oblique bundle.A sign that the entire A1 pulley is released is seeing the corner formed by the distal edge of the pulley and the longitudinal cut in the pulley. Additionally, the cut halves of the fully released pulley will rest completely in the sagittal plane of the thumb, no longer converging over the FPL tendon.Tight bands can exist proximal and distal to the A1 pulley and should be released as well if present.Check for a tight IP volar plate following A1 division, which may require postoperative splinting.For thumbs stuck in extension, tenodesis can be utilized to verify complete A1 release.Utilize absorbable sutures, local anesthesia, and a bulky dressing to allow a comfortable postoperative course.

Acronyms and Abbreviations

IP = interphalangealMP = metacarpophalangealFPL = flexor pollicis longusROM = range of motionANOVA = analysis of variance.

Pediatric Trigger Digits

Pediatric trigger thumb (PTT) and finger (PTF) are upper extremity deformities that frequently go unrecognized by providers. Early recognition by pediatricians and caregivers is vital because PTT is successfully treated nonoperatively in more than 95% of patients if diagnosed early. Similarly, PTF can be successfully treated nonoperatively in 67% of patients. Although PTT is typically benign and 10 times more common, PTF may be associated with underlying concurrent medical conditions, such as juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes, mucopolysaccharide and lysosomal disorders, and trisomy 18. Routine examinations consisting of full hand range of motion should be performed in all children. Clinicians should be aware of the importance of conservative treatment options for PTT and PTF and the value of screening for underlying medical conditions associated with PTF.

Neglected congenital trigger thumb

We present a case of neglected trigger thumb in a forty-year-old male. The patient presented to our clinic due to bilateral triggering of his fourth digit. He attested to having pain and limitation of joint movement of his left thumb since his childhood in the former Soviet Union, with occasional triggering. This eventually subsided and the thumb became stuck in relative flexion and could not be fully extended. We performed X-rays of both thumbs wherein the left affected thumb interphalangeal joint showed an aberrant configuration and sclerosis of both joint surfaces. The joint surface curvature was altered on the left side and contact area reduced. This presentation of altered thumb interphalangeal joint biomechanics following an untreated congenital trigger thumb further emphasizes the need for surgical intervention when indicated.

Congenital Disorders of the Pediatric Thumb

»

Surgical timing for pediatric trigger thumb treatment is controversial for numerous reasons including the potential for spontaneous resolution, the possibility of bilateral involvement, and anesthesia concerns regarding the developing brain. Hence, a reasonable approach is to delay the surgical procedure until the patient is ≥3 years of age.

»

Preaxial polydactyly is usually unilateral and sporadic, with the most common reconstruction method consisting of excision of the diminutive thumb with preservation and soft-tissue reconstruction of the dominant thumb. The surgical procedure is typically performed around the patient age of 1 year to decrease the risks of anesthesia but allow reconstruction prior to the development of a tip-to-tip pinch.

»

Triphalangeal thumb and thumb hypoplasia are often found in the setting of systemic anomalies such as Holt-Oram syndrome, thrombocytopenia absent radius syndrome, Fanconi anemia, VACTERL (vertebral anomalies, anal atresia, cardiac anomalies, tracheoesophageal fistula, renal defects, and limb anomalies), and/or Blackfan-Diamond anemia. As such, patients should receive adequate workup for these entities. A surgical procedure should be performed only once patients have been medically cleared.

»

The status of the carpometacarpal joint in thumb hypoplasia determines whether reconstruction with first web space deepening, collateral ligament stabilization, and opponensplasty compared with index pollicization is performed.

Pediatric Trigger Digit Presenting in the Setting of Trauma

BACKGROUND

Pediatric trigger digit is a relatively rare condition with incompletely understood etiology. In our practice, we noted a series of children presenting with pediatric trigger digit after an associated local trauma to the hand, which has not been previously described. The aim of this study was to analyze the nature of presentation of trigger digits, the accuracy of initial diagnosis, and the impact on treatment strategies used.

METHODS

An institutional review board-approved retrospective review of our institution's experience with pediatric trigger finger from 2001 to 2015 was performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients with 26 affected digits were identified. Eighty-eight percent of patients were diagnosed with trigger thumb, whereas 3 patients (12%) had small finger triggering. Thirteen patients (59%) presented as outpatients, whereas 9 (41%) presented through the emergency department. All patients presenting to the emergency department were in the setting of recent minor trauma. Of this subset of patients, 67% had an incorrect initial diagnosis, leading to an average delay in treatment of 60 days. Ten patients (45% of total) were initially treated with immobilization versus surgical release of the A1 pulley. However, all but 2 of these patients required eventual A1 pulley release for persistent or recurrent triggering (88%).

CONCLUSIONS

The cause of trigger digit in children remains incompletely understood and may be multifactorial. In this series, a traumatic component to presentation was found in a significant number of patients. This association with minor trauma may contribute to misdiagnosis and delay in definitive treatment. Although initial treatment with immobilization does not seem to impact surgical outcome, we found a high rate of failure with initial immobilization. Most patients required eventual surgical management, regardless of whether or not the initial presentation was associated with trauma. When performed, we found that A1 pulley release alone has safe, reliable results.

Splinting for the treatment of pediatric trigger thumbs: a pilot study

Controversy still exists whether conservative treatment may be a useful option for the treatment of pediatric trigger thumbs. We reviewed a random sample patient cohort with regard to success rates depending on whether flexible or fixed trigger thumbs were present. We performed a pilot study of 13 children (15 thumbs), who received a standardized treatment protocol including a custom-made thermoplastic splint for use during sleeping hours for a minimum of 3 months. Splinting was of only minor value for moderate and severe cases was but was beneficial for the majority of patients showing triggering symptoms only. It may thus be a reasonable option to delay surgery in infants with mild/flexible cases.

Network meta-analysis of management of trigger thumb in children

To estimate and rank cure and recurrence rates between conservative and operative treatments for trigger thumb in children. A systematic review was conducted by searching PubMed and Scopus. Eligible criteria were comparative studies included non-syndromic trigger thumbs, aged up to 10 years, reported at least 20 thumbs and followed up at least 12 months. Two assessors independently extracted data and appraised for cure, recurrence rates among observation, stretching, splinting, open surgery, and percutaneous surgery. We assessed the risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions. A network meta-analysis, and probability of being the best outcomes were estimated with surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA). From 6853 searched articles, eight studies (799 children and 981 thumbs) were included. Mean age was 1.87-2.83 years and average followed up time was 1-5.7 years. Open surgery, percutaneous release, splinting, and stretching had higher cure rate than observation; pooled risk ratio (95% confidence interval) of 2.06 (1.53-2.78), 1.79 (1.26-2.53), 1.76 (1.30-2.36), and 1.37 (0.93-2.03), respectively. Percutaneous release increased risk of recurrence 3.29 times (1.42-7.60) when compared with open surgery. The best cure rates were open surgery (SUCRA = 95) followed by splint (SUCRA = 63.4), and percutaneous technique (SUCRA= 62.8). The highest recurrence rates were percutaneous (SUCRA = 97.3), and open surgery (SUCRA = 62.4). Splint is the most appropriate intervention for pediatric trigger thumb. After failed conservative methods, open surgery is considered for operative treatment. Level of evidence: Therapeutic study level II-III.

The Development of Trigger Thumb in the Contralateral Thumb in Pediatric Patients Presenting Initially With Unilateral Involvement

Background: Pediatric trigger thumb is a common condition that can occur bilaterally. There have been reports of a metachronous relationship between trigger thumbs developing in both extremities. Surgeons might consider delaying operative treatment of unilateral trigger thumb due to the concern that contralateral symptoms may develop later in childhood, requiring a second procedure and anesthetic event. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with pediatric trigger thumb from 2008 to 2016 at a large pediatric hospital. Data collected included age at presentation and onset, laterality, age and timing of onset of contralateral symptoms, time of index procedure and subsequent procedure (if any), severity of symptoms, previous treatments, range of motion, and birth history. Results: There were 198 patients with pediatric trigger thumb, with 55 patients (28%) presenting with or developing bilateral involvement. Fifty patients (25%) had bilateral involvement upon initial presentation. Five patients (3%) were subsequently diagnosed with contralateral trigger thumb after initial presentation of unilateral trigger thumb. Average time to contralateral trigger thumb development was 12 months after presentation in unilateral patients. Most patients presented with locked flexion contracture with palpable Notta's nodule. Of the 5 patients who developed contralateral trigger thumbs, three required a second surgery after the index procedure. Conclusions: The vast majority of patients with bilateral trigger thumbs had bilateral involvement upon initial presentation to the pediatric hand clinic. Given the rarity of bilateral symptoms after initial unilateral presentation, we do not recommend delayed surgical intervention for patients with unilateral disease in children over 3 years of age.

Efficacy Analysis of Day Surgery A1 Pulley Release for Pediatric Trigger Thumb

Objective: To investigate clinical application of day surgery A1 pulley release for pediatric trigger thumb. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 1,642 children with trigger thumb who were treated with day surgery A1 pulley release at our hospital, including satisfaction surveys, functional recovery, and complications. Results: The operative time for unilateral and bilateral tenolysis was 4.8 ± 3.1 and 9.2 ± 3.8 min, respectively. Three children had postoperative fever and were discharged on the 2nd day after surgery. The rest of the children were discharged on the day of surgery. All incisions healed primarily, and no complications of vascular and nerve injury were reported. The patients' degree of satisfaction with the medical treatment process, diagnosis and treatment workflow, treatment effectiveness, length of hospital stay and hospitalization cost, and discharge guidance were 97.9, 96.1, 99.3, 91.1, and 98.5%, respectively. The follow-up period was between 5 months and 3 years and 1 month. Four children experienced symptom relapse after the operation, and re-tenolysis was performed in one of them. At the final follow-up, the appearance and function of the thumb had recovered well in all cases. Conclusion: Day surgery A1 pulley release can effectively release tendon sheaths and has a short operative time, no complications of vascular and nerve injury, and good recovery of thumb function. It is a safe and reliable procedure with high patient satisfaction, and it is worthy of clinical promotion.

Pediatric Trigger Thumb: Congenital or Developmental? A Unique Case Report

Pediatric trigger thumb is the new terminology for the so-called congenital trigger thumb. This change in appellation was suggested based on recent knowledge acquired through prospective studies of a large number of newborns for the presence of trigger thumb at birth across many centers. In this background, we came across a newborn with trigger thumb which was diagnosed right after birth, putting aside all theories of nonexistence of congenital trigger thumb. We report a case of congenital trigger thumb diagnosed at birth, which was managed surgically at 9 months of age, who has good clinical and functional outcomes at 1-year follow-up. Herewith, we would like to submit that congenital trigger thumb does exist, though might be a very rare occurrence.

Pulling the Trigger: Recommendations for Surgical Care of the Pediatric Trigger Thumb

BACKGROUND

Despite being a common pediatric hand condition, there are few clear guidelines regarding the optimal management of pediatric trigger thumb. Our primary aim was to help guide surgical management of this disorder by establishing a treatment algorithm on the basis of our institution's experience.

METHODS

This is an institutional review board-approved retrospective study of all patients with idiopathic trigger thumbs from 2005 to 2015 at a single institution. Demographics and treatment course were recorded for all patients including duration of follow-up, observation, surgical intervention, and complications. All children were classified according to the Sugimoto classification.

RESULTS

A total of 149 patients with 193 thumbs met inclusion and exclusion criteria. 16.5% of patients had stage II thumbs, 10.3% of patients with stage III, and 73% of patients with stage IV thumbs. Of all patients with stage IV thumbs, 3.5% were locked in extension for an overall incidence of 2.6%.In total, 46% of patients failed observation and underwent surgical treatment. Only 14% of stage IV trigger thumbs resolved when observed, compared with 53% of stage II and 25% of stage III trigger thumbs. Stage IV thumbs were 4.6 times more likely to fail conservative treatment and go on to surgery than stage II or III thumbs (odds ratio, 4.6; P=0.006).Thirty-two percent of patients underwent surgery without an observation period. Older children with bilateral stage 3 thumbs were the most likely to go straight to the odds ratio instead of being observed (P=0.002, r=0.17).Of the total amount of patients who underwent surgery (116), there were 4 complications for a rate of 3.4% with a recurrence rate of 1.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of the data in this study, the authors would recommend that stage IV thumbs undergo surgery without an observational period. Second, stage II and stage III thumbs can be safely observed for at least 1 year before surgery. Finally, our study concurs with the literature that surgery can be successful with low rates of complications and recurrence.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Pediatric trigger thumb caused by a flexor tendon sheath ganglion

Pediatric trigger thumb is a common reason for toddlers to present to a pediatric orthopaedic surgeon. There is controversy over the precise etiology and optimal treatment method. Current accepted diagnostic and treatment algorithms in children have not varied based on etiology. This report describes the clinical presentation and care of a 3-year-old child with pediatric trigger thumb and surgical findings of a large flexor tendon sheath ganglion at the level of the annular pulley with no apparent nodule within the FPL. The potential implications for consideration of etiology in current diagnostic and treatment guidelines are discussed.

Treatment of paediatric trigger finger: a systematic review and treatment algorithm

PURPOSE

Paediatric trigger finger (PTF) is a rare condition as seen by the lack of studies published about paediatric populations. Due to this general lack of information, the steps to employ to correct this disorder, whether surgically or non-surgically, have not yet reached consensus status. The objective of this study is to review the published literature regarding treatment options for PTF in order to develop a proposed step-wise treatment algorithm for children presenting with trigger finger.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted on PubMed to locate English language studies reporting on treatment interventions of PTF. Data was collected on number of patients/fingers seen in the study, the category of the fingers involved, the number of patients/fingers undergoing each intervention and reported outcomes.

RESULTS

Seven articles reporting on 118 trigger fingers were identified. In all, 64 fingers were treated non-surgically, with 57.8% (37/64) resolving. In all, 54 fingers were initially surgically treated, with 87% (47/54) resolving. In total, 34 fingers did not have resolution of symptoms following primary treatment, and 27 fingers received follow-up treatment, with 92.6% (25/27) resolving. Overall, 92.4% (109/118) of fingers achieved resolution of symptoms after all treatments were completed.

CONCLUSION

Limitations for this study included few prospective studies and small sample sizes. This is likely due to the rarity of PTF. This review of the literature indicated that a step-wise approach, including non-operative and surgical techniques, should be employed in the management of PTF.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This work meets the requirements of the PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses).

[Malformations of hand and forearm : Conspicuous postpartum]

Many congenital malformations of the hand and forearm, e. g. polydactyly, thumb duplication, syndactyly and radial aplasia, are already evident at birth and newborns are promptly referred to specialized departments. In contrast, orthopedic surgeons are often confronted with malformations of the hand and forearm, which gradually become clinically conspicuous during growth. This review article focuses on these specific malformations, which regularly upset the patients in practice and in most cases the parents even more so. In addition to the diagnostics and differential diagnostics, the conservative and surgical treatment options are presented.

Pediatric Trigger Digits

Pediatric trigger thumb presents not at birth but early in childhood. Most evidence suggests that it is caused by a developmental size mismatch between the flexor pollicis longus tendon and its sheath. Patients generally present with the thumb interphalangeal joint locked in flexion. Surgical reviews report near universally excellent outcomes after open release of the A1 pulley. However, recent reports indicate that there may be a role for nonsurgical treatment for families that are willing to wait several years for possible spontaneous resolution of the deformity. Triggering in digits other than the thumb in children is generally associated with an underlying diagnosis including anatomic abnormalities of the tendons, and metabolic, inflammatory, and infectious etiologies. Although some have advocated nonsurgical treatment, surgery is often necessary to address the underlying anatomic etiology. More extensive surgery beyond simple A1 pulley release is often required, including release of the A3 pulley and resection of a slip of the flexor digitorum superficialis tendon.