Clinical outcomes of the oblique V-Y advancement pulp flap for repair of lateral fingertip injuries

Outcomes of antegrade homodigital neurovascular island flap in fingertip amputations

BACKGROUND

Antegrade homodigital neurovascular island flap (AHIF) is one of the methods used in fingertip amputations to cover the defect area, preserve finger length and obtain a painless and sensitive fingertip. The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional and sensory outcomes in patients who underwent AHIF for fingertip amputation and to analyze the relationship between patient satisfaction and outcome measures.

METHODS

Twenty patients with a mean age of 37 (18-63) years were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were evaluated in terms of hook nail development, active interphalangeal joint movements, cold intolerance, and sensory function of the flap covered area. Static two-point discrimination test and Semmes Weinstein monofilament test were performed for sensory evaluation.

RESULTS

All flaps survived completely at the end of follow-up (mean, 36 months; range 11-64 months). Five patients had cold intolerance and two had hook nails. In total, proximal interphalangeal or distal interphalangeal joint flexion contracture developed in 25 % of the patients. The mean static two-point discrimination score was 4.6 ± 1.6 (2-8) and Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test score was 3.48 ± 0.6 (2.44-4.17). Subjective satisfaction levels of the patients were found to be high and did not show a statistical relationship with the measured clinical outcome parameters (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Since AHIF contains a solid and continuous neurovascular pedicle, the probability of necrosis and loss of sensation is low in AHIF. In addition, the graft need of the donor area is not high. Its disadvantage is the rate of restriction of joint movements.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Repair of Finger Pulp Defect and Sensory Reconstruction Using Reverse Homodigital Artery Island Flap With Palmar Cutaneous Branches of the Proper Digital Nerve

OBJECTIVE

To illustrate the clinical outcomes of the reverse digital proper artery island flap with anastomosing the palmar cutaneous branches of the proper digital nerve for the reconstruction of finger pulp defects.

METHODS

From December 2007 to December 2017, a total of 20 patients with finger pulp defects were treated with reverse digital proper artery island flap for innervated construction. Functional outcomes, aesthetic appearance, and complications were evaluated. Functional outcomes were assessed according to range of motion, sensory grade (S0-S4), static 2-point discrimination, Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test, and Cold Intolerance Severity Score. Aesthetic appearance was evaluated according to the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire.

RESULTS

All flaps survived completely without any complications, and all patients were followed up for at least 12 months. The average static 2-point discrimination, Semmes-Weinstein monofilament, and Cold Intolerance Severity Score results of the injured fingers were 6.35 mm (range, 5-8 mm), 3.64 (range, 2.83-4.17), and 19 (range, 8-24), respectively. All patients achieved recovery in sensation from S3+ to S4. The active ranges of motion of the metacarpophalangeal, proximal interphalangeal, and distal interphalangeal joints of the affected fingers were satisfactory. Based on the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, 11 patients were strongly satisfied, and 9 were satisfied with the appearance of the injured finger.

CONCLUSIONS

The reverse digital proper artery island flap with anastomosing the palmar cutaneous branches of the proper digital nerve is an effective and reliable alternative for the reconstruction of finger pulp defect. In the recovery of sensation, this flap leads to satisfactory effects.

Reverse digital artery island flap with versus without sensory nerve coaptation for finger pulp reconstruction

PURPOSE

Whether an innervated reverse digital artery island flap is superior to a non-innervated reverse digital artery island flap still remains controversial. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of the two flaps in repairing finger pulp soft tissue defects.

METHODS

Medical records of patients who underwent finger pulp reconstruction between January 2007 and December 2017 were evaluated retrospectively. A total of 45 patients were included. Twenty underwent sensory nerve reconstruction with cutaneous branches of the proper digital nerve, and 25 underwent the surgery without sensory nerve reconstruction. Surgical results, complications and sensory function were collected for analysis. Sensory function was assessed by static two-point discrimination and the modified sensory evaluation standard of British Medical Research Council.

RESULTS

The average operation time of innervated flaps was 23 min longer than non-innervated flaps. All 45 flaps survived completely. There was no significant difference in complications between groups. The average follow-up was 22 months. At the final follow-up, five non-innervated flaps had no recovery of static two-point discrimination. The average static two-point discrimination of the remaining 20 non-innervated flaps was larger than that of innervated flaps. Innervated flaps consistently achieved higher sensory function grades according to the modified sensory evaluation standard of British Medical Research Council.

CONCLUSION

An innervated reverse digital artery island flap can achieve better sensory function recovery in a shorter time. This procedure did not increase the incidence of complications, although it extended the operation time. It has proven to be a good technique for finger pulp reconstruction.