Perinatal outcomes among young Indigenous Australian mothers: A cross-sectional study and comparison with adult Indigenous mothers

BACKGROUND

The teenage pregnancy rate is high among Indigenous Australian women, yet little is known about their pregnancy outcomes. Moreover, against a background of extreme social disadvantage, the relative importance of age as a risk factor for adverse outcomes among Indigenous pregnancies is unclear. We compared perinatal outcomes for Indigenous teenagers (<20 years) with adult Indigenous women (20-34 years), and described outcomes in subgroups of teenagers.

METHODS

Data were analyzed for 2421 singleton births to Indigenous women aged <35 years in Australia's Northern Territory from 2003 to 2005. Regression was used to assess the effect of young maternal age on normal birth, healthy baby, preterm birth, low birthweight, special care admission, and mean birthweight, adjusting for covariates.

RESULTS

Three-quarters of teenagers and 62% of adult mothers lived in remote areas. Smoking rates were around 50% in both groups. Teenagers were more likely to have a normal birth than adults (adjusted odds ratio 1.78 [95% CI 1.35-2.34]). The groups did not differ for healthy baby, preterm birth, or low birthweight. Babies of teenagers weighed 135 g less than those of adults; however, adjustment for covariates eliminated this difference. Examination of teenage subgroups (≤16 years and 17-19 years) revealed risk behaviors being higher for 17-19 years olds than for the younger group, and more prevalent among urban-based mothers.

DISCUSSION

Young maternal age is not a risk factor for adverse perinatal outcomes among Indigenous women. Rather, they are having babies in disadvantaged circumstances within a system challenged to support them socially and clinically.

Standing Your Ground: The Importance of Health Information Managers Sharing What They Do

Health information management professionals have a broad range of skills that are invaluable to the health sector. The advent of the electronic health record has provided the opportunity to aggregate patient data to answer clinical and policy questions in a systematic, timely and reproducible way. The possibility of linking datasets provides greater opportunities for answering clinical and policy questions, and Health Information Managers (HIMs) have the best skill set to inform about data quality, coding and classification, privacy, security, and medicolegal implications involved in the ethical handling of such datasets. HIMs have access to a wealth of data that could improve patient care and reduce unnecessary service utilisation, and that could be used to answer many research questions. Undertaking and publishing research is an excellent avenue for HIMs to promote and strengthen their profession.