1
|
Pleus S, Eichenlaub M, Waldenmaier D, Freckmann G. A Critical Discussion of Alert Evaluations in the Context of Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Performance. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2024; 18:847-856. [PMID: 38477308 PMCID: PMC11307228 DOI: 10.1177/19322968241236504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
Many continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems provide functionality which alerts users of potentially unwanted glycemic conditions. These alerts can include glucose threshold alerts to call the user's attention to hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia, predictive alerts warning about impeding hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia, and rate-of-change alerts. A recent review identified 129 articles about CGM performance studies, of which approximately 25% contained alert evaluations. In some studies, real alerts were assessed; however, most of these studies retrospectively determined the timing of CGM alerts because not all CGM systems record alerts which necessitates manual documentation. In contrast to assessment of real alerts, retrospective determination allows assessment of a variety of alert settings for all three types of glycemic condition alerts. Based on the literature and the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute's POCT05 guideline, two common approaches to threshold alert evaluation were identified, one value-based and one episode-based approach. In this review, a critical discussion of the two approaches, including a post hoc analysis of clinical study data, indicates that the episode-based approach should be preferred over the value-based approach. For predictive alerts, fewer results were found in the literature, and retrospective determination of CGM alert timing is complicated by the prediction algorithms being proprietary information. Rate-of-change alert evaluations were not reported in the identified literature, and POCT05 does not contain recommendations for assessment. A possible approach is discussed including post hoc analysis of clinical study data. To conclude, CGM systems should record alerts, and the episode-based approach to alert evaluation should be preferred.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Pleus
- Institut für Diabetes-Technologie,
Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm,
Germany
| | - Manuel Eichenlaub
- Institut für Diabetes-Technologie,
Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm,
Germany
| | - Delia Waldenmaier
- Institut für Diabetes-Technologie,
Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm,
Germany
| | - Guido Freckmann
- Institut für Diabetes-Technologie,
Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm,
Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fuchs S, Caserto JS, Liu Q, Wang K, Shariati K, Hartquist CM, Zhao X, Ma M. A Glucose-Responsive Cannula for Automated and Electronics-Free Insulin Delivery. ADVANCED MATERIALS (DEERFIELD BEACH, FLA.) 2024; 36:e2403594. [PMID: 38639424 PMCID: PMC11223976 DOI: 10.1002/adma.202403594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2024] [Revised: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
Automated delivery of insulin based on continuous glucose monitoring is revolutionizing the way insulin-dependent diabetes is treated. However, challenges remain for the widespread adoption of these systems, including the requirement of a separate glucose sensor, sophisticated electronics and algorithms, and the need for significant user input to operate these costly therapies. Herein, a user-centric glucose-responsive cannula is reported for electronics-free insulin delivery. The cannula-made from a tough, elastomer-hydrogel hybrid membrane formed through a one-pot solvent exchange method-changes permeability to release insulin rapidly upon physiologically relevant varying glucose levels, providing simple and automated insulin delivery with no additional hardware or software. Two prototypes of the cannula are evaluated in insulin-deficient diabetic mice. The first cannula-an ends-sealed, subcutaneously inserted prototype-normalizes blood glucose levels for 3 d and controls postprandial glucose levels. The second, more translational version-a cannula with the distal end sealed and the proximal end connected to a transcutaneous injection port-likewise demonstrates tight, 3-d regulation of blood glucose levels when refilled twice daily. This proof-of-concept study may aid in the development of "smart" cannulas and next-generation insulin therapies at a reduced burden-of-care toll and cost to end-users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Fuchs
- Biological and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA
| | - Julia S. Caserto
- Robert Frederick Smith School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca NY, 14853, USA
| | - Qingsheng Liu
- Biological and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA
| | - Kecheng Wang
- Biological and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA
| | - Kaavian Shariati
- Biological and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA
| | - Chase M. Hartquist
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Xuanhe Zhao
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Minglin Ma
- Biological and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yuan CY, Halim B, Kong YW, Lu J, Dutt-Ballerstadt R, Eckenberg P, Hillen K, Koski A, Milenkowic V, Netzer E, Obeyesekere V, Reid S, Sims C, Vogrin S, Wu HP, Seidl T, O'Neal DN. Combining an Electrochemical Continuous Glucose Sensor With an Insulin Delivery Cannula: A Feasibility Study. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2024:19322968241236771. [PMID: 38491800 DOI: 10.1177/19322968241236771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Combining a continuous glucose monitor with an insulin delivery cannula (CGM-IS) could benefit clinical outcomes. We evaluated the feasibility of a single-needle insertion electrochemical investigational CGM-IS (Pacific Diabetes Technologies, Portland, Oregon) in type 1 diabetes adults. METHODS Following 48 hours run-in using a Medtronic 780G in manual mode with a commercial insulin set, 12 participants commenced insulin delivery using the CGM-IS. A standardized test meal was eaten on the mornings of days 1 and 4. Venous samples were collected every 10 minutes one hour prior to and 15 minutes post-meal for four hours. CGM-IS glucose measurements were post-processed with a single capillary blood calibration during warm-up and benchmarked against YSI. A Dexcom G6 sensor was worn post-consent to study end. RESULTS Mean absolute relative difference (MARD) for the CGM-IS glucose measurements was 9.2% (484 paired data points). Consensus error grid revealed 88.6% within zone A and 100% in A + B. Mean (SD) % bias was -3.5 (11.7) %. There were 35 paired YSI readings <100 mg/dL cutoff and 449 ≥100 mg/dL with 81.4% within ±15 mg/dL or ±15%, and 89.9% within ±20 mg/dL or ±20%. Two cannula occlusions required discontinuation of insulin delivery: one at 70 hours post insertion and another during the day 4 meal test. Mean (SD) Dexcom glucose measurements during run-in and between meal tests was respectively 161.3 ± 27.3 mg/dL versus 158.0 ± 25.6 mg/dL; P = .39 and corresponding mean total daily insulin delivered by the pump was 58.0 ± 25.4 Units versus 57.1 ± 28.8 Units; P = .47. CONCLUSIONS Insulin delivery and glucose sensing with the investigational CGM-IS was feasible. Longer duration studies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng Yi Yuan
- Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, The University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia
| | - Bella Halim
- Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, The University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia
| | - Yee W Kong
- Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, The University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia
| | - Jean Lu
- Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, The University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia
| | | | | | - Ken Hillen
- Pacific Diabetes Technologies, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Anh Koski
- Pacific Diabetes Technologies, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Emma Netzer
- Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, The University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia
| | - Varuni Obeyesekere
- Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, The University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia
| | - Solomon Reid
- Pacific Diabetes Technologies, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Catriona Sims
- Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, The University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia
| | - Sara Vogrin
- Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, The University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia
| | - Huan-Ping Wu
- Pacific Diabetes Technologies, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Thomas Seidl
- Pacific Diabetes Technologies, Portland, OR, USA
| | - David N O'Neal
- Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, The University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Freckmann G, Eichenlaub M, Waldenmaier D, Pleus S, Wehrstedt S, Haug C, Witthauer L, Jendle J, Hinzmann R, Thomas A, Eriksson Boija E, Makris K, Diem P, Tran N, Klonoff DC, Nichols JH, Slingerland RJ. Clinical Performance Evaluation of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems: A Scoping Review and Recommendations for Reporting. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2023; 17:1506-1526. [PMID: 37599389 PMCID: PMC10658695 DOI: 10.1177/19322968231190941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
The use of different approaches for design and results presentation of studies for the clinical performance evaluation of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems has long been recognized as a major challenge in comparing their results. However, a comprehensive characterization of the variability in study designs is currently unavailable. This article presents a scoping review of clinical CGM performance evaluations published between 2002 and 2022. Specifically, this review quantifies the prevalence of numerous options associated with various aspects of study design, including subject population, comparator (reference) method selection, testing procedures, and statistical accuracy evaluation. We found that there is a large variability in nearly all of those aspects and, in particular, in the characteristics of the comparator measurements. Furthermore, these characteristics as well as other crucial aspects of study design are often not reported in sufficient detail to allow an informed interpretation of study results. We therefore provide recommendations for reporting the general study design, CGM system use, comparator measurement approach, testing procedures, and data analysis/statistical performance evaluation. Additionally, this review aims to serve as a foundation for the development of a standardized CGM performance evaluation procedure, thereby supporting the goals and objectives of the Working Group on CGM established by the Scientific Division of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guido Freckmann
- IFCC Scientific Division - Working Group on Continuous Glucose Monitoring
- Institut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Manuel Eichenlaub
- Institut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Delia Waldenmaier
- Institut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Stefan Pleus
- Institut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Stephanie Wehrstedt
- Institut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Cornelia Haug
- Institut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Lilian Witthauer
- Diabetes Center Berne, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology, Nutritional Medicine and Metabolism, Inselspital Bern, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Johan Jendle
- IFCC Scientific Division - Working Group on Continuous Glucose Monitoring
- School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Rolf Hinzmann
- IFCC Scientific Division - Working Group on Continuous Glucose Monitoring
- Roche Diabetes Care GmbH, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Andreas Thomas
- IFCC Scientific Division - Working Group on Continuous Glucose Monitoring
- Pirna, Germany
| | - Elisabet Eriksson Boija
- IFCC Scientific Division - Working Group on Continuous Glucose Monitoring
- Equalis AB, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Konstantinos Makris
- IFCC Scientific Division - Working Group on Continuous Glucose Monitoring
- Clinical Biochemistry Department, KAT General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Peter Diem
- IFCC Scientific Division - Working Group on Continuous Glucose Monitoring
- Endokrinologie Diabetologie Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Nam Tran
- IFCC Scientific Division - Working Group on Continuous Glucose Monitoring
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - David C. Klonoff
- IFCC Scientific Division - Working Group on Continuous Glucose Monitoring
- Diabetes Research Institute, Mills-Peninsula Medical Center, San Mateo, CA, USA
| | - James H. Nichols
- IFCC Scientific Division - Working Group on Continuous Glucose Monitoring
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Robbert J. Slingerland
- IFCC Scientific Division - Working Group on Continuous Glucose Monitoring
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schoemaker M, Martensson A, Mader JK, Nørgaard K, Freckmann G, Benhamou PY, Diem P, Heinemann L. Combining Glucose Monitoring and Insulin Infusion in an Integrated Device: A Narrative Review of Challenges and Proposed Solutions. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2023:19322968231203237. [PMID: 37798963 DOI: 10.1177/19322968231203237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
The introduction of automated insulin delivery (AID) systems has enabled increasing numbers of individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) to improve their glycemic control largely. However, use of AID systems is limited due to their complexity and costs associated. The user must wear both a continuously monitoring glucose system and an insulin infusion pump. The glucose sensor and the insulin catheter must be inserted at two different body sites using different insertion devices. In addition, the user must pair and manage the different systems. These communicate with the AID software implemented on the pump or on a third device such as a dedicated display device or smart phone application. These components might be developed and commercialized by different manufacturers, which in turn can cause difficulties for patients seeking technical support. A possible solution to these challenges would be to integrate the glucose sensor and insulin catheter into a single device. This would allow the glucose sensor and insulin catheter to be inserted simultaneously, eliminating the need for pairing, and simplifying system management. In recent years, different technologies have been developed and evaluated in clinical investigations that combine the glucose sensor and the insulin catheter in one platform. The consistent finding of all these studies is that integration has no adverse effect on insulin infusion and glucose measurements provided that certain conditions are met. In this review, we discuss the perceived challenges of such an approach and discuss possible solutions that have been proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Kirsten Nørgaard
- Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Guido Freckmann
- Institut für Diabetes-Technologie, Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Pierre-Yves Benhamou
- Department of Endocrinology, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France
| | - Peter Diem
- Artificial Intelligence in Health and Nutrition, ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Lutz Heinemann
- Science-Consulting in Diabetes GmbH, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Combining technologies including rapid insulin analogs, insulin pumps, continuous glucose monitors, and control algorithms has allowed for the creation of automated insulin delivery (AID) systems. These systems have proven to be the most effective technology for optimizing metabolic control and could hold the key to broadly achieving goal-level glycemic control for people with type 1 diabetes. The use of AID has exploded in the past several years with several options available in the United States and even more in Europe. In this article, we review the largest studies involving these AID systems, and then examine future directions for AID with an emphasis on usability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory P. Forlenza
- School of Medicine, Barbara Davis Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Rayhan A. Lal
- Department of Medicine & Pediatrics, Divisions of Endocrinology Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lal RA, Hsu L, Zhang J, Schøndorff PK, Heschel M, Buckingham B. Longevity of the novel ConvaTec infusion set with Lantern technology. Diabetes Obes Metab 2021; 23:1973-1977. [PMID: 33822472 PMCID: PMC8720264 DOI: 10.1111/dom.14395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Revised: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Current insulin infusion sets are approved for only 2-3 days. The novel ConvaTec infusion set with Lantern technology is designed to extend infusion set wear time. The goal of this pilot study was to evaluate the duration of wear for this set. This was a pilot safety study in adults with type 1 diabetes using tethered insulin pumps. Participants inserted the set and wore it for 10 days or until failure. Among 24 participants, two were excluded. Forty-five per cent of the sets lasted 10 days. Median wear time was 9.1 (7.1, 10.0) days. Among 12 premature failures, six (50%) involved adhesive failures, four (33%) hyperglycaemia unresponsive to correction, one (8%) hyperglycaemia with ketones and one (8%) infection. Average CGM glucose per day of infusion set wear showed a statistically significant increase over time, while total daily insulin over the same period did not change. In this pilot study, the duration of wear for the novel infusion set exceeded previously reported commercial sets (P < .001). This extended wear technology may eventually allow for a combined glucose sensor and infusion set.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rayhan A. Lal
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford, California
| | - Liana Hsu
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Jian Zhang
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | | | | | - Bruce Buckingham
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lal RA, Leelarathna L. Insulin Delivery Hardware: Pumps and Pens. Diabetes Technol Ther 2021; 23:S32-S45. [PMID: 34061635 PMCID: PMC8881955 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2021.2503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rayhan A Lal
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine & Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
- Stanford Diabetes Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Lalantha Leelarathna
- Manchester Diabetes Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, U.K and Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Malandrucco I, Russo B, Picconi F, Menduni M, Frontoni S. Glycemic Status Assessment by the Latest Glucose Monitoring Technologies. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:E8243. [PMID: 33153229 PMCID: PMC7663245 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21218243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Revised: 10/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The advanced and performing technologies of glucose monitoring systems provide a large amount of glucose data that needs to be properly read and interpreted by the diabetology team in order to make therapeutic decisions as close as possible to the patient's metabolic needs. For this purpose, new parameters have been developed, to allow a more integrated reading and interpretation of data by clinical professionals. The new challenge for the diabetes community consists of promoting an integrated and homogeneous reading, as well as interpretation of glucose monitoring data also by the patient himself. The purpose of this review is to offer an overview of the glycemic status assessment, opened by the current data management provided by latest glucose monitoring technologies. Furthermore, the applicability and personalization of the different glycemic monitoring devices used in specific insulin-treated diabetes mellitus patient populations will be evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilaria Malandrucco
- Unit of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, S. Giovanni Calibita, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, 00186 Rome, Italy; (I.M.); (B.R.); (F.P.)
| | - Benedetta Russo
- Unit of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, S. Giovanni Calibita, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, 00186 Rome, Italy; (I.M.); (B.R.); (F.P.)
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy;
| | - Fabiana Picconi
- Unit of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, S. Giovanni Calibita, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, 00186 Rome, Italy; (I.M.); (B.R.); (F.P.)
| | - Marika Menduni
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy;
| | - Simona Frontoni
- Unit of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, S. Giovanni Calibita, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, 00186 Rome, Italy; (I.M.); (B.R.); (F.P.)
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Laugesen C, Schmidt S, Tetzschner R, Nørgaard K, Ranjan AG. Glucose Sensor Accuracy After Subcutaneous Glucagon Injections Near to Sensor Site. Diabetes Technol Ther 2020; 22:131-135. [PMID: 31560217 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2019.0278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Background: Integrated hormone delivery and glucose sensing is warranted, but system performance could be challenged by glucose sensor susceptibility to pharmacological interferences. The aim of this study was to compare sensor accuracy (Medtronic Enlite 2®) after subcutaneous (s.c.) administration of low-dose glucagon near to versus remote from sensor site. Methods: Twelve adults with insulin-pump-treated type 1 diabetes wore two continuous glucose monitors (CGMglucagon and CGMcontrol) placed on each side of the abdomen before, during, and after two overnight 14-h in-clinic visits. During each visit, a s.c. 100 μg glucagon injection was administered 2 cm next to the CGMglucagon followed by another injection of 100 μg glucagon 2 h later at the same site. CGM performance was evaluated using 4-h in-clinic Yellow Spring Instrument (YSI) measurements and 3-day self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in free-living conditions. Results: Using YSI as comparator, no difference in the median absolute relative difference (MARD) for CGMglucagon (15.7%) and CGMcontrol (13.4%) was found (P = 0.195). Similarly, no difference in MARD was found between CGMglucagon (11.0%) and CGMcontrol (6.2%) using SMBG as comparator (P = 0.148). Values in zone A + B of Clarke error grid analysis did not differ between CGMglucagon and CGMcontrol using YSI (93.9% vs. 91.1%, P = 0.250) and SMBG (97.3% vs. 95.0%, P = 0.375) as reference measurement. The precision absolute relative deviation between sensors was 13.7%. Conclusions: Sensor accuracy was not significantly affected by administration of s.c. glucagon near to sensor site.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Signe Schmidt
- Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Clinical Research, Gentofte, Denmark
- Department of Endocrinology, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
- Danish Diabetes Academy, Odense, Denmark
| | - Rikke Tetzschner
- Department of Endocrinology, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Kirsten Nørgaard
- Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Clinical Research, Gentofte, Denmark
- Department of Endocrinology, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Ajenthen G Ranjan
- Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Clinical Research, Gentofte, Denmark
- Department of Endocrinology, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
- Danish Diabetes Academy, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Heinemann L, Schoemaker M, Schmelzeisen-Redecker G, Hinzmann R, Kassab A, Freckmann G, Reiterer F, Del Re L. Benefits and Limitations of MARD as a Performance Parameter for Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Interstitial Space. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2020; 14:135-150. [PMID: 31216870 PMCID: PMC7189145 DOI: 10.1177/1932296819855670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
High-quality performance of medical devices for glucose monitoring is important for a safe and efficient usage of this diagnostic option by patients with diabetes. The mean absolute relative difference (MARD) parameter is used most often to characterize the measurement performance of systems for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Calculation of this parameter is relatively easy and comparison of the MARD numbers between different CGM systems appears to be straightforward on the first glance. However, a closer look reveals that a number of complex aspects make interpretation of the MARD numbers provided by the manufacturer for their CGM systems difficult. In this review, these aspects are discussed and considerations are made for a systematic and appropriate evaluation of the MARD in clinical trials. The MARD should not be used as the sole parameter to characterize CGM systems, especially when it comes to nonadjunctive usage of such systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lutz Heinemann
- Science & Co, Neuss, Germany
- Lutz Heinemann, PhD, Science & Co,
Geulenstr 36, 41462 Neuss, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | - Guido Freckmann
- Institut für Diabetes-Technologie
Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tauschmann M, Hovorka R. Technology in the management of type 1 diabetes mellitus - current status and future prospects. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2018; 14:464-475. [PMID: 29946127 DOI: 10.1038/s41574-018-0044-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) represents 5-10% of diabetes cases worldwide. The incidence of T1DM is increasing, and there is no immediate prospect of a cure. As such, lifelong management is required, the burden of which is being eased by novel treatment modalities, particularly from the field of diabetes technologies. Continuous glucose monitoring has become the standard of care and includes factory-calibrated subcutaneous glucose monitoring and long-term implantable glucose sensing. In addition, considerable progress has been made in technology-enabled glucose-responsive insulin delivery. The first hybrid insulin-only closed-loop system has been commercialized, and other closed-loop systems are under development, including dual-hormone glucose control systems. This Review focuses on well-established diabetes technologies, including glucose sensing, pen-based insulin delivery, data management and data analytics. We also cover insulin pump therapy, threshold-based suspend, predictive low-glucose suspend and single-hormone and dual-hormone closed-loop systems. Clinical practice recommendations for insulin pump therapy and continuous glucose monitoring are presented, and ongoing research and future prospects are highlighted. We conclude that the management of T1DM is improved by diabetes technology for the benefit of the majority of people with T1DM, their caregivers and guardians and health-care professionals treating patients with T1DM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Tauschmann
- Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Roman Hovorka
- Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bonato L, Taleb N, Gingras V, Messier V, Gobeil F, Ménard J, Ardilouze JL, Rabasa-Lhoret R. Duration of Catheter Use in Patients with Diabetes Using Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion: A Review. Diabetes Technol Ther 2018; 20:506-515. [PMID: 29958025 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2018.0110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Increasing proportions of patients with diabetes use continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy mostly due to its clinical efficacy and flexibility for insulin dosing and adjustments. Some challenges are nevertheless associated with this technology. A key and underlooked component of CSII technical difficulties is the subcutaneous catheter used to infuse insulin. Several adverse events (AEs) have been experienced by patients in relation to catheters, such as blockage, kinking, and insertion site reactions, including irritation, infections, lipohypertrophies etc., all of which could compromise the metabolic control. With the objective of minimizing these AEs, recommendations for changing catheters every 2-3 days have historically been provided by manufacturers based on reports derived from small studies and anecdotal data. The aim of this review was to provide an updated analysis of current recommendations and patients' practices in relation to frequency of catheter change. Our main findings are: (1) adequately designed and powered studies investigating optimal catheter wearing time are still lacking; (2) increasing catheter wearing time is generally associated with increased frequency of catheter AEs; (3) however, interpatient variability is large, with some individuals needing to change their catheters every 2-3 days, whereas others probably being able to keep them in place for longer periods without problems. Further research is thus warranted to provide more solid and evidence-based recommendations while exploring personalized approaches at the same time. Increasing catheter wear life without significant side effects is an important goal to simplify CSII therapy and reduce its associated costs and burdens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Bonato
- 1 Research Platform on obesity, metabolism and diabetes, Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal (IRCM) , Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Nadine Taleb
- 1 Research Platform on obesity, metabolism and diabetes, Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal (IRCM) , Montréal, Québec, Canada
- 2 Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medecine, Université de Montréal , Édouard-Montpetit, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Véronique Gingras
- 1 Research Platform on obesity, metabolism and diabetes, Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal (IRCM) , Montréal, Québec, Canada
- 3 Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Medecine, Université de Montréal , Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Virginie Messier
- 1 Research Platform on obesity, metabolism and diabetes, Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal (IRCM) , Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Fernand Gobeil
- 4 Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke , Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
- 5 Diabetes, obesity and cardiovscular complications axis, Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke , Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Julie Ménard
- 5 Diabetes, obesity and cardiovscular complications axis, Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke , Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Jean-Luc Ardilouze
- 5 Diabetes, obesity and cardiovscular complications axis, Research Center of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke , Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
- 6 Endocrine Division, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke , Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Rémi Rabasa-Lhoret
- 1 Research Platform on obesity, metabolism and diabetes, Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal (IRCM) , Montréal, Québec, Canada
- 3 Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Medecine, Université de Montréal , Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- 7 Montréal Diabetes Research Center , Saint-Denis Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Forlenza GP. Insulin Infusion Sets and Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensors: Where the Artificial Pancreas Meets the Patient. Diabetes Technol Ther 2017; 19:206-208. [PMID: 28418732 PMCID: PMC5583547 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2017.0048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
15
|
Graf A, McAuley SA, Sims C, Ulloa J, Jenkins AJ, Voskanyan G, O’Neal DN. Moving Toward a Unified Platform for Insulin Delivery and Sensing of Inputs Relevant to an Artificial Pancreas. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2017; 11:308-314. [PMID: 28264192 PMCID: PMC5478040 DOI: 10.1177/1932296816682762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Advances in insulin pump and continuous glucose monitoring technology have primarily focused on optimizing glycemic control for people with type 1 diabetes. There remains a need to identify ways to minimize the physical burden of this technology. A unified platform with closely positioned or colocalized interstitial fluid glucose sensing and hormone delivery components is a potential solution. Present challenges to combining these components are interference of glucose sensing from proximate insulin delivery and the large discrepancy between the life span of current insulin infusion sets and glucose sensors. Addressing these concerns is of importance given that the future physical burden of this technology is likely to be even greater with the ongoing development of the artificial pancreas, potentially incorporating multiple hormone delivery, glucose sensing redundancy, and sensing of other clinically relevant nonglucose biochemical inputs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anneke Graf
- Department of Endocrinology & Diabetes, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sybil A. McAuley
- Department of Endocrinology & Diabetes, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Catriona Sims
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Alicia J. Jenkins
- Department of Endocrinology & Diabetes, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - David N. O’Neal
- Department of Endocrinology & Diabetes, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- David N. O’Neal, MBBS, MD, Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, 29 Regent St, Fitzroy, Melbourne, VIC 3065, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gazda LS, Collins J, Lovatt A, Holdcraft RW, Morin MJ, Galbraith D, Graham M, Laramore MA, Maclean C, Black J, Milne EW, Marthaler DG, Vinerean HV, Michalak MM, Hoffer D, Richter S, Hall RD, Smith BH. A comprehensive microbiological safety approach for agarose encapsulated porcine islets intended for clinical trials. Xenotransplantation 2016; 23:444-463. [PMID: 27862363 PMCID: PMC7169751 DOI: 10.1111/xen.12277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2016] [Revised: 09/06/2016] [Accepted: 09/22/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of porcine islets to replace insulin-producing islet β-cells, destroyed during the diabetogenic disease process, presents distinct challenges if this option is to become a therapeutic reality for the treatment of type 1 diabetes. These challenges include a thorough evaluation of the microbiological safety of the islets. In this study, we describe a robust porcine islet-screening program that provides a high level of confidence in the microbiological safety of porcine islets suitable for clinical trials. METHODS A four-checkpoint program systematically screens the donor herd (Large White - Yorkshire × Landrace F1 hybrid animals), individual sentinel and pancreas donor animals and, critically, the islet macrobeads themselves. Molecular assays screen for more than 30 known viruses, while electron microscopy and in vitro studies are employed to screen for potential new or divergent (emergent) viruses. RESULTS Of 1207 monthly samples taken from random animals over a 2-year period, only a single positive result for Transmissible gastroenteritis virus was observed, demonstrating the high level of biosecurity maintained in the source herd. Given the lack of clinical signs, positive antibody titers for Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus, Porcine parvovirus, and Influenza A confirm the efficacy of the herd vaccination program. Porcine respiratory coronavirus was found to be present in the herd, as expected for domestic swine. Tissue homogenate samples from six sentinel and 11 donor animals, over the same 2-year period, were negative for the presence of viruses when co-cultured with six different cell lines from four species. The absence of adventitious viruses in separate islet macrobead preparations produced from 12 individual pancreas donor animals was confirmed using validated molecular (n = 32 viruses), in vitro culture (cells from four species), and transmission electron microscopy assays (200 cell profiles per donor animal) over the same 2-year period. There has been no evidence of viral transmission following the implantation of these same encapsulated and functional porcine islets into non-immunosuppressed diabetic cynomolgus macaques for up to 4 years. Isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells from all time points were negative for PCV (Type 2), PLHV, PRRSV, PCMV, and PERV-A, PERV-B, and PERV-C by PCR analysis in all six recipient animals. CONCLUSION The four-checkpoint program is a robust and reliable method for characterization of the microbiological safety of encapsulated porcine islets intended for clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - James Collins
- Veterinary Diagnostic LaboratoryUniversity of MinnesotaSaint PaulMNUSA
| | | | | | | | | | - Melanie Graham
- Department of SurgeryUniversity of MinnesotaSaint PaulMNUSA
- Department of Veterinary Population MedicineUniversity of MinnesotaSaint PaulMNUSA
| | | | | | | | | | - Douglas G. Marthaler
- Veterinary Diagnostic LaboratoryUniversity of MinnesotaSaint PaulMNUSA
- Department of Veterinary Population MedicineUniversity of MinnesotaSaint PaulMNUSA
| | - Horatiu V. Vinerean
- Office of Laboratory Animal ResearchFlorida International UniversityMiamiFLUSA
- Department of SurgeryHerbert Wertheim College of MedicineMiamiFLUSA
| | | | | | | | | | - Barry H. Smith
- Department of SurgeryWeill Medical College of Cornell University and NewYork‐Presbyterian HospitalNew YorkNYUSA
- The Rogosin InstituteNew YorkNYUSA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Karlin AW, Ly TT, Pyle L, Forlenza GP, Messer L, Wadwa RP, DeSalvo DJ, Payne SL, Hanes S, Clinton P, Maahs DM, Buckingham B. Duration of Infusion Set Survival in Lipohypertrophy Versus Nonlipohypertrophied Tissue in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 2016; 18:429-35. [PMID: 27227290 PMCID: PMC4931738 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2015.0432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improved insulin infusion set survival and faster insulin action are important issues for pump users and for the development of an artificial pancreas. The current recommendation is to change infusion sets every 3 days. Our objectives were to determine the effect of lipohypertrophy (LH) on infusion set survival and continuous glucose monitoring glucose levels. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS In this multicenter crossover trial, we recruited 20 subjects (age 28.1 ± 9.0 years) with type 1 diabetes (duration 17.5 ± 8.8 years) and an area of lipohypertrophied tissue >3 cm. Subjects alternated weekly wearing a Teflon infusion set in an area of either LH or non-LH for 4 weeks. Sets were changed after (a) failure or (b) surviving 7 days of use. RESULTS The least-squares mean duration of infusion set survival for sets that lasted <7 days in lipohypertrophied tissue was 4.31 days compared with 4.12 days in nonlipohypertrophied tissue (P = 0.71). The average duration of set survival for individual subjects ranged from 2.2 to 7.0 days. Infusion sets in lipohypertrophied tissue failed due to hyperglycemia in 35% of subjects compared with 23% in nonlipohypertrophied tissue (P = 0.22). Both lipohypertrophied and nonlipohypertrophied tissues displayed a general increase in mean daily glucose after the third day of infusion set wear, but daily mean glucose did not differ by tissue type (P > 0.38 on each day). CONCLUSION LH did not significantly affect infusion set survival or mean glucose. Achieving optimal infusion set performance requires research into factors affecting set survival. Additionally, the recommendation for duration of set change may need to be individualized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew W. Karlin
- Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Trang T. Ly
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
- School of Paediatrics and Child Health, The University of Western Australian, Perth, Western Australia
| | - Laura Pyle
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, University of Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Gregory P. Forlenza
- Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Laurel Messer
- Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
| | - R. Paul Wadwa
- Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Daniel J. DeSalvo
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
- Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Houston, Texas
| | - Sydney L. Payne
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Sarah Hanes
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Paula Clinton
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - David M. Maahs
- Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Bruce Buckingham
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Naranjo D, Tanenbaum ML, Iturralde E, Hood KK. Diabetes Technology: Uptake, Outcomes, Barriers, and the Intersection With Distress. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2016; 10:852-8. [PMID: 27234809 PMCID: PMC4928242 DOI: 10.1177/1932296816650900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Patients managing type 1 diabetes have access to new technologies to assist in management. This manuscript has two aims: 1) to briefly review the literature on diabetes technology use and how this relates to psychological factors and 2) to present an example of human factors research using our data to examine psychological factors associated with technology use. Device/technology uptake and use has increased over the years and at present day is a common clinical practice. There are mixed results in terms of health and psychosocial outcomes, with specific subgroups doing better than others with technology. Our data demonstrated that patients have moderately elevated diabetes distress across differing types of technology used, from low-tech to high-tech options, possibly meaning that technology does not add or take away distress. In addition, users on multiple daily injections compared to all other technology groups have less positive attitudes about technology. Finally, we discuss implications for clinical practice and future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Naranjo
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA, USA
| | - Molly L Tanenbaum
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA, USA
| | - Esti Iturralde
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA, USA
| | - Korey K Hood
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA, USA Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Snell-Bergeon JK. Assessing Insulin Delivery Device Satisfaction in Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 2015; 17:759-62. [PMID: 26535926 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2015.0260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Over the past several decades, insulin treatment has changed drastically, not only with the development of further insulin analogs but also with the introduction of novel insulin delivery devices such as pumps and pens. In addition, adjunct devices such as continuous glucose monitors and sensor-augmented pumps have become increasingly used in clinical care, increasing the volume of information available to patients and providers. However, with the development of new devices it has become clear that along with the many benefits of these advances, the use of these devices can also present a burden to people with diabetes. For example, some patients report being overwhelmed by too much data when using continuous glucose monitors. Furthermore, there are concerns regarding the accuracy of some of these new devices, particularly for glucose monitoring. As a result, some patients may choose not to use available devices, despite the recognized benefits. Therefore, it is critical to understand how the various insulin delivery devices available currently and in the future affect patients in terms of their diabetes management and perceived burdens and to understand which patient characteristics may predict a lack of satisfaction with these devices. This critical gap in our knowledge is addressed in an article in this issue of the journal through the development of a questionnaire that allows for a better understanding of the impact of insulin delivery devices on quality of life and diabetes management among both type 1 diabetes and insulin-dependent type 2 diabetes patients. The novelty, as well as limitations, of this new instrument for the assessment of insulin delivery device satisfaction are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet K Snell-Bergeon
- Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus , Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lee SW, Welsh JB. Upcoming Devices for Diabetes Management: The Artificial Pancreas as the Hallmark Device. Diabetes Technol Ther 2015; 17:538-41. [PMID: 26237307 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2014.0303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|