The impact of right ventricular pressure and function on survival in patients with pulmonary vein stenosis

Predictors of Serious Adverse Events and High-Level Cardiorespiratory Support in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Pulmonary Vein Interventions

Patients with pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) often require frequent transcatheter pulmonary vein (PV) interventions for management of restenosis. Predictors of serious adverse events (AEs) and need for high-level cardiorespiratory support (mechanical ventilation, vasoactive support, and/or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) 48 h after transcatheter PV interventions have not been reported. This is a single-center retrospective cohort analysis of patients with PVS who underwent transcatheter PV interventions from 3/1/2014 to 12/31/2021. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed using generalized estimating equations to account for within-patient correlation. 240 patients underwent 841 catheterizations involving PV interventions (median 2 catheterizations per patient [1,3]). At least one serious AE was reported in 100 (12%) cases, the most common of which were pulmonary hemorrhage (n = 20) and arrhythmia (n = 17). There were 14 severe/catastrophic AEs (1.7% of cases) including three strokes and one patient death. On multivariable analysis, age less than 6 months, low systemic arterial saturation (< 95% in patients with biventricular [BiV] physiology, < 78% in single ventricle [SV] physiology), and severely elevated mean PA pressure (≥ 45 mmHg in BiV, ≥ 17 mmHg in SV) were associated with SAEs. Age less than 1 year, hospitalization prior to catheterization, and moderate-severe RV dysfunction were associated with high-level support after catheterization. Serious AEs during transcatheter PV interventions in patients with PVS are common, although major events such as stroke or death are uncommon. Younger patients and those with abnormal hemodynamics are more likely to experience serious AEs and require high-level cardiorespiratory support after catheterization.

Management of Pediatric Pulmonary Vein Stenosis

Pediatric intraluminal pulmonary vein stenosis has evolved into a chronic illness, with improving survival. Although significant knowledge gaps remain, medical providers have found success in the management of patients with pulmonary vein stenosis using a comprehensive multimodality treatment strategy. This review discusses the core principles employed by 4 centers dedicated to improving pulmonary vein stenosis outcomes, including how to make the diagnosis, educating the family, treatment strategy, the importance of surveillance, and the management of symptoms and comorbidities.

Primary Pulmonary Vein Stenosis: A New Look at a Rare but Challenging Disease

Primary pulmonary vein stenosis (PPVS) represents a rare but emerging, often progressive heterogeneous disease with high morbidity and mortality in the pediatric population. Although our understanding of PPVS disease has improved markedly in recent years, much remains unknown regarding disease pathogenesis, distinct disease phenotypes, and patient- and disease-related risk factors driving the unrelenting disease progression characteristic of PPVS. In the pediatric population, risk factors identified in the development of PPVS include an underlying congenital heart disease, prematurity and associated conditions, and an underlying genetic or congenital syndrome. Continued improvement in the survival of high-risk populations, coupled with ongoing advances in general PPVS awareness and diagnostic imaging technologies suggest that PPVS will be an increasingly prevalent disease affecting pediatric populations in the years to come. However, significant challenges persist in both the diagnosis and management of PPVS. Standardized definitions and risk stratification for PPVS are lacking. Furthermore, evidence-based guidelines for screening, monitoring, and treatment remain to be established. Given these limitations, significant practice variation in management approaches has emerged across centers, and contemporary outcomes for patients affected by PPVS remain guarded. To improve care and outcomes for PPVS patients, the development and implementation of universal definitions for disease and severity, as well as evidence-based guidelines for screening, monitoring, cardiorespiratory care, and indications for surgical intervention will be critical. In addition, collaboration across institutions will be paramount in the creation of regionalized referral centers as well as a comprehensive patient registry for those requiring pulmonary vein stenosis.

Outcomes in Establishing Individual Vessel Patency for Pediatric Pulmonary Vein Stenosis

The purpose of this study was to determine what patient and pulmonary vein characteristics at the diagnosis of intraluminal pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) are predictive of individual vein outcomes. A retrospective, single-center, cohort sub-analysis of individual pulmonary veins of patients enrolled in the clinical trial NCT00891527 using imatinib mesylate +/− bevacizumab as adjunct therapy for the treatment of multi-vessel pediatric PVS between March 2009 and December 2014 was performed. The 72-week outcomes of the individual veins are reported. Among the 48 enrolled patients, 46 patients and 182 pulmonary veins were included in the study. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that patients with veins without distal disease at baseline (odds ratio, OR 3.69, 95% confidence interval, CI [1.52, 8.94], p = 0.004), location other than left upper vein (OR 2.58, 95% CI [1.07, 6.19], p = 0.034), or veins in patients ≥ 1 y/o (OR 5.59, 95% CI [1.81, 17.3], p = 0.003) were at higher odds of having minimal disease at the end of the study. Veins in patients who received a higher percentage of eligible drug doses required fewer reinterventions (IRR 0.76, 95% CI [0.68, 0.85], p < 0.001). The success of a multi-modal treatment approach to aggressive PVS depends on the vein location, disease severity, and drug dose intensity.

Intervening with the Nitric Oxide Pathway to Alleviate Pulmonary Hypertension in Pulmonary Vein Stenosis

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) as a result of pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) is extremely difficult to treat. The ideal therapy should not target the high-pressure/low-flow (HP/LF) vasculature that drains into stenotic veins, but only the high-pressure/high-flow (HP/HF) vasculature draining into unaffected pulmonary veins, reducing vascular resistance and pressure without risk of pulmonary oedema. We aimed to assess the activity of the nitric oxide (NO) pathway in PVS during the development of PH, and investigate whether interventions in the NO pathway differentially affect vasodilation in the HP/HF vs. HP/LF territories. Swine underwent pulmonary vein banding (PVB; n = 7) or sham surgery (n = 6) and were chronically instrumented to assess progression of PH. Pulmonary sensitivity to exogenous NO (sodium nitroprusside, SNP) and the contribution of endogenous NO were assessed bi-weekly. The pulmonary vasodilator response to phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) inhibition was assessed 12 weeks after PVB or sham surgery. After sacrifice, 12 weeks post-surgery, interventions in the NO pathway on pulmonary small arteries isolated from HP/LF and HP/HF territories were further investigated. There were no differences in the in vivo pulmonary vasodilator response to SNP and the pulmonary vasoconstrictor response to endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) inhibition up to 8 weeks after PVB as compared to the sham group. However, at 10 and 12 weeks post-PVB, the in vivo pulmonary vasodilation in response to SNP was larger in the PVB group. Similarly, the vasoconstriction to eNOS inhibition was larger in the PVB group, particularly during exercise, while pulmonary vasodilation in response to PDE5 inhibition was larger in the PVB group both at rest and during exercise. In isolated pulmonary small arteries, sensitivity to NO donor SNP was similar in PVB vs. sham groups irrespective of HP/LF and HP/HF, while sensitivity to the PDE5 inhibitor sildenafil was lower in PVB HP/HF and sensitivity to bradykinin was lower in PVB HP/LF. In conclusion, both NO availability and sensitivity were increased in the PVB group. The increased nitric oxide sensitivity was not the result of a decreased PDE5 activity, as PDE5 activity was even increased. Some vasodilators differentially effect HP/HF vs. HP/LF vasculature.