The cardiac arrest centre for the treatment of sudden cardiac arrest due to presumed cardiac cause - aims, function and structure: Position paper of the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care of the European Society of Cardiology (AVCV), European Association of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (EAPCI), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), European Resuscitation Council (ERC), European Society for Emergency Medicine (EUSEM) and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM)

Volume-Outcome Relationships for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Acute Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a major scenario for the use of an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), particularly when complicated by cardiogenic shock, although the utilization of mechanical circulatory support devices varies widely per hospital. We evaluated the relationship, at the hospital level, between the volume of IABP use and mortality in AMI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using a Japanese nationwide administrative database, 26,490 patients with AMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from 154 hospitals were included in this study. The primary endpoint was the observed-to-predicted in-hospital mortality ratio. Predicted mortality per patient was calculated using baseline variables and averaged for each hospital. The associations among PCI volume for AMI, observed and predicted in-hospital mortality, and observed and predicted IABP use were assessed per hospital. Of 26,490 patients, 2,959 (11.2%) were treated with IABP and 1,283 (4.8%) died during hospitalization. The annualized number of uses of IABP per hospital in AMI was 4.5. In lower-volume primary PCI centers, IABP was more likely to be underused than expected, and the observed-to-predicted in-hospital mortality ratio was higher than in higher-volume centers.

CONCLUSIONS

A lower annual number of IABP use was associated with an increased mortality risk at the hospital level, suggesting that IABP use can be an institutional quality indicator in the setting of AMI.

Emerging Evidence in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest-A Critical Appraisal of the Cardiac Arrest Center

The morbidity and mortality of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) due to presumed cardiac causes have remained unwaveringly high over the last few decades. Less than 10% of patients survive until hospital discharge. Treatment of OHCA patients has traditionally relied on expert opinions. However, there is growing evidence on managing OHCA patients favorably during the prehospital phase, coronary and intensive care, and even beyond hospital discharge. To improve outcomes in OHCA, experts have proposed the establishment of cardiac arrest centers (CACs) as pivotal elements. CACs are expert facilities that pool resources and staff, provide infrastructure, treatment pathways, and networks to deliver comprehensive and guideline-recommended post-cardiac arrest care, as well as promote research. This review aims to address knowledge gaps in the 2020 consensus on CACs of major European medical associations, considering novel evidence on critical issues in both pre- and in-hospital OHCA management, such as the timing of coronary angiography and the use of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR). The goal is to harmonize new evidence with the concept of CACs.

[Open questions with respect to extracorporeal circulatory support 2024]

The use of extracorporeal circulatory support, both for cardiogenic shock and during resuscitation, still presents many unanswered questions. The inclusion and exclusion criteria for such a resource-intensive treatment must be clearly defined, considering that these criteria are directly associated with the type and location of treatment. For example, it is worth questioning the viability of an extracorporeal resuscitation program in areas where it is impossible to achieve low-flow times under 60 min due to local limitations. Additionally, the best approach for further treatment, including whether it is necessary to regularly relieve the left ventricle, must be explored. To find answers to some of these questions, large-scale, multicenter, randomized studies and registers must be performed. Until then this treatment must be carefully considered before use.

Volume-outcome relationships for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in acute myocardial infarction

Acute myocardial infarction (MI) is one of the major scenarios of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use. The utilization of mechanical circulatory support systems including ECMO varies widely at the hospital level, while whether ECMO volume per hospital is associated with outcomes in acute MI is unclear. Using a Japanese nationwide administrative database, a total of 26,913 patients with acute MI undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention from 154 hospitals were included. The relations among PCI volume for acute MI, observed and predicted in-hospital mortality, and observed and predicted rates of ECMO use were evaluated at the hospital level. Of 26,913 patients, 423 (1.6%) were treated with ECMO, and 1561 (5.8%) died during the hospitalization. Median ECMO use per hospital per year was 0.5. An observed rate of ECMO use was linearly correlated with the predicted probability of ECMO use and was not associated with the observed/predicted in-hospital mortality ratio. The observed/predicted mortality ratio was lowest in hospitals with the observed/predicted ECMO use ratio of around one. In conclusion, ECMO was infrequently used in a setting of acute MI at each hospital annually. An observed rate of ECMO use was not associated with observed/predicted in-hospital mortality ratio, while the observed/predicted in-hospital mortality ratio was lowest when ECMO was used as predicted, suggesting that standardized ECMO use may be an institutional quality indicator in acute MI.

Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Cardiovascular Critical Care Society/Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology Clinical Practice Update on Optimal Post Cardiac Arrest and Refractory Cardiac Arrest Patient Care

Survival to hospital discharge among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is low and important regional differences in treatment practices and survival have been described. Since the 2017 publication of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society's position statement on OHCA care, multiple randomized controlled trials have helped to better define optimal post cardiac arrest care. This working group provides updated guidance on the timing of cardiac catheterization in patients with ST-elevation and without ST-segment elevation, on a revised temperature control strategy targeting normothermia instead of hypothermia, blood pressure, oxygenation, and ventilation parameters, and on the treatment of rhythmic and periodic electroencephalography patterns in patients with a resuscitated OHCA. In addition, prehospital trials have helped craft new expert opinions on antiarrhythmic strategies (amiodarone or lidocaine) and outline the potential role for double sequential defibrillation in patients with refractory cardiac arrest when equipment and training is available. Finally, we advocate for regionalized OHCA care systems with admissions to a hospital capable of integrating their post OHCA care with comprehensive on-site cardiovascular services and provide guidance on the potential role of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients with refractory cardiac arrest. We believe that knowledge translation through national harmonization and adoption of contemporary best practices has the potential to improve survival and functional outcomes in the OHCA population.

A multidisciplinary guideline-based approach to improving the sudden cardiac arrest care pathway: The Copenhagen framework

Although recommended in the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) Guidelines, a framework for delivering post-cardiac arrest care in a systematic manner in dedicated high-volume cardiac arrest centers is lacking in the existing literature. To our knowledge, the Copenhagen Framework is the only established framework of its kind. The framework comprises management of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survivors, and follow-up, and rehabilitation. The framework also incorporates research projects on cardiac arrest survivors and their close family members. The overall aim of this paper is to describe a framework made in order to bridge the gaps between international recommendations and delivering high-quality post-resuscitation clinical care, improving the continuity of care for OHCA survivors, access to post-CA rehabilitation, a seamless transition to everyday life, and ultimately patient outcomes in the future.

Improving survival after cardiac arrest in Europe: The synergetic effect of rescue chain strategies

Sudden cardiac arrest is a global problem and is considered the third leading cause of death in industrialized countries. Patient survival rates after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) vary significantly between countries and continents. In particular, the 2021 European Resuscitation Council (ERC) Resuscitation Guidelines place a special focus on the chain of survival of patients after OHCA. As a complex, interconnected approach, the focus is on: Raising awareness for cardiac arrest and lay resuscitation, school children's education in resuscitation "KIDS SAVE LIVES", first responder systems - technologies to engage the community, telephone-assisted resuscitation (telephone-CPR; T-CPR) by dispatchers, and cardiac arrest centers (CAC) for further treatment in specialized hospitals. The Systems Saving Lives approach is a comprehensive strategy that emphasizes the interconnectedness of all links in the chain of survival following an OHCA, with a particular focus on the relationship between the community and emergency medical services (EMS). This system-level approach emphasizes the importance of the connection between all those involved in the chain of survival. It has a high potential to improve overall survival after OHCA. Therefore, it is recommended that these strategies be promoted and expanded in all countries.

Air pollution and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest risk: a 7-year study from a highly polluted area

AIMS

Globally, nearly 20% of cardiovascular disease deaths were attributable to air pollution. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) represents a major public health problem; therefore, the identification of novel OHCA triggers is of crucial relevance. The aim of the study was to evaluate the association between air pollution (short-, mid-, and long-term exposures) and OHCA risk, during a 7-year period in a highly polluted urban area in northern Italy, with a high density of automated external defibrillators (AEDs).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrests were prospectively collected from the 'Progetto Vita Database' between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2017; day-by-day air pollution levels were extracted from the Environmental Protection Agency stations. Electrocardiograms of OHCA interventions were collected from the AED data cards. Day-by-day particulate matter (PM) 2.5 and 10, ozone (O3), carbon monoxide (CO), and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) levels were measured. A total of 880 OHCAs occurred in 748 days. A significant increase in OHCA risk with a progressive increase in PM2.5, PM10, CO, and NO2 levels was found. After adjustment for temperature and seasons, a 9% and 12% increase in OHCA risk for each 10 μg/m3 increase in PM10 (P < 0.0001) and PM2.5 (P < 0.0001) levels was found. Air pollutant levels were associated with both asystole and shockable rhythm risk, while no correlation was found with pulseless electrical activity.

CONCLUSION

Short- and mid-term exposures to PM2.5 and PM10 are independently associated with the risk of OHCA due to asystole or shockable rhythm.

Telephone cardiopulmonary resuscitation, first responder systems, cardiac arrest centers, and global campaigns to save lives

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The latest resuscitation guidelines contain a new chapter, which focuses on systems improving care for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). In this article, we describe recent developments regarding telephone cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), first responder systems, cardiac arrest centers, and global campaigns.

RECENT FINDINGS

Telephone CPR has been implemented in many countries, and recent developments include artificial intelligence and video calls to improve dispatch assisted CPR. However, the degree of implementation is not yet satisfying. Smartphone alerting systems are effective in reducing the resuscitation-free interval, but many regions do not yet use this technology. Further improvements are needed to reduce response times. Cardiac arrest centers increase the survival chance after OHCA. Specific criteria need to be defined and professional societies should establish a certification process. Global campaigns are effective in reaching people around the world. However, we need to evaluate the effects of the campaigns.

SUMMARY

Telephone CPR, first responder systems, cardiac arrest centers, and global campaigns are highlighted in the recent resuscitation guidelines. However, the degree of implementation is not yet sufficient. We do not only need to implement these measures, but we should also aim to monitor the systems regarding their performance and further improve them.

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation-based approach to refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A focus on organ donation, a secondary analysis of a Prague OHCA randomized study

BACKGROUND

Refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has a poor outcome. In patients, who cannot be rescued despite using advanced techniques like extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), organ donation may be considered. This study aims to evaluate, in refractory OHCA, how ECPR versus a standard-based approach allows organ donorship.

METHODS

The Prague OHCA trial randomized adults with a witnessed refractory OHCA of presumed cardiac origin to either an ECPR-based or standard approach. Patients who died of brain death or those who died of primary circulatory reasons and were not candidates for cardiac transplantation or durable ventricle assist device were evaluated as potential organ donors by a transplant center. In this post-hoc analysis, the effect on organ donation rates and one-year organ survival in recipients was examined.

RESULTS

Out of 256 enrolled patients, 75 (29%) died prehospitally or within 1 hour after admission and 107 (42%) during the hospital stay. From a total of 24 considered donors, 21 and 3 (p = 0.01) were recruited from the ECPR vs standard approach arm, respectively. Fifteen brain-dead and none cardiac-dead subjects were ultimately accepted, 13 from the ECPR and two from the standard strategy group. A total of 36 organs were harvested. The organs were successfully transplanted into 34 recipients. All transplanted organs were fully functional, and none of the recipients died due to graft failure within the one-year period post-transplant.

CONCLUSION

The ECPR-based approach in the refractory OHCA trial is associated with increased organ donorship and an excellent outcome of transplanted organs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01511666. Registered January 19, 2012.

Early and late withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the United Kingdom: Institutional variation and association with hospital mortality

AIM

Frequency and timing of Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment (WLST) after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) vary across Intensive Care Units (ICUs) in the United Kingdom (UK) and may be a marker of lower healthcare quality if instituted too frequently or too early. We aimed to describe WLST practice, quantify its variability across UK ICUs, and assess the effect of institutional deviation from average practice on patients' risk-adjusted hospital mortality.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective multi-centre cohort study including all adult patients admitted after OHCA to UK ICUs between 2010 and 2017. We identified patient and ICU characteristics associated with early (within 72 h) and late (>72 h) WLST and quantified the between-ICU variation. We used the ICU-level observed-to-expected (O/E) ratios of early and late-WLST frequency as separate metrics of institutional deviation from average practice and calculated their association with patients' hospital mortality.

RESULTS

We included 28,438 patients across 204 ICUs. 10,775 (37.9%) had WLST and 6397 (59.4%) of them had early-WLST. Both WLST types were strongly associated with patient-level demographics and pre-existing conditions but weakly with ICU-level characteristics. After adjustment, we found unexplained between-ICU variation for both early-WLST (Median Odds Ratio 1.59, 95%CrI 1.49-1.71) and late-WLST (MOR 1.39, 95%CrI 1.31-1.50). Importantly, patients' hospital mortality was higher in ICUs with higher O/E ratio of early-WLST (OR 1.29, 95%CI 1.21-1.38, p < 0.001) or late-WLST (OR 1.39, 95%CI 1.31-1.48, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant variability exists between UK ICUs in WLST frequency and timing. This matters because unexplained higher-than-expected WLST frequency is associated with higher hospital mortality independently of timing, potentially signalling prognostic pessimism and lower healthcare quality.

Indications for Cardiac Catheterization and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Resuscitated Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The role of emergent cardiac catheterization after resuscitated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has evolved based on recent randomized evidence. This review aims to discuss the latest evidence and current indications for emergent coronary angiography (CAG) and mechanical circulatory support (MCS) use following OHCA.

RECENT FINDINGS

In contrast to previous observational data, recent RCTs evaluating early CAG in resuscitated OHCA patients without ST elevation have uniformly demonstrated a lack of benefit in terms of survival or neurological outcome. There is currently no randomized evidence supporting MCS use specifically in patients with resuscitated OHCA and cardiogenic shock. Urgent CAG should be considered in all patients with ST elevation, recurrent electrical or hemodynamic instability, those who are awake following resuscitated OHCA, and those receiving extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). Recent evidence suggests that CAG may be safely delayed in hemodynamically stable patients without ST-segment elevation following resuscitated OHCA.

Expedited transfer to a cardiac arrest centre for non-ST-elevation out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (ARREST): a UK prospective, multicentre, parallel, randomised clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation has called for a randomised trial of delivery to a cardiac arrest centre. We aimed to assess whether expedited delivery to a cardiac arrest centre compared with current standard of care following resuscitated cardiac arrest reduces deaths.

METHODS

ARREST is a prospective, parallel, multicentre, open-label, randomised superiority trial. Patients (aged ≥18 years) with return of spontaneous circulation following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest without ST elevation were randomly assigned (1:1) at the scene of their cardiac arrest by London Ambulance Service staff using a secure online randomisation system to expedited delivery to the cardiac catheter laboratory at one of seven cardiac arrest centres or standard of care with delivery to the geographically closest emergency department at one of 32 hospitals in London, UK. Masking of the ambulance staff who delivered the interventions and those reporting treatment outcomes in hospital was not possible. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 30 days, analysed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population excluding those with unknown mortality status. Safety outcomes were analysed in the ITT population. The trial was prospectively registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Registry, 96585404.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 15, 2018, and Dec 1, 2022, 862 patients were enrolled, of whom 431 (50%) were randomly assigned to a cardiac arrest centre and 431 (50%) to standard care. 20 participants withdrew from the cardiac arrest centre group and 19 from the standard care group, due to lack of consent or unknown mortality status, leaving 411 participants in the cardiac arrest centre group and 412 in the standard care group for the primary analysis. Of 822 participants for whom data were available, 560 (68%) were male and 262 (32%) were female. The primary endpoint of 30-day mortality occurred in 258 (63%) of 411 participants in the cardiac arrest centre group and in 258 (63%) of 412 in the standard care group (unadjusted risk ratio for survival 1·00, 95% CI 0·90-1·11; p=0·96). Eight (2%) of 414 patients in the cardiac arrest centre group and three (1%) of 413 in the standard care group had serious adverse events, none of which were deemed related to the trial intervention.

INTERPRETATION

In adult patients without ST elevation, transfer to a cardiac arrest centre following resuscitated cardiac arrest in the community did not reduce deaths.

FUNDING

British Heart Foundation.

Factors Associated with Favorable Outcomes in Cardiac Arrest and Target Temperature Management

Current guidelines strongly recommend providing targeted temperature management (TTM) after cardiac arrest, but hypothalamic dysregulation may confound TTM's impact on a patient's ultimate outcome. Although time to reach target temperature has largely been viewed as a process measure for TTM protocols, the difference between initial presenting temperature and target temperature (Δ-temperature) may be a potential surrogate marker of hypothalamic dysregulation. We performed a retrospective observational study to explore whether Δ-temperature was associated with neurologic outcomes and mortality. We included 86 patients (53 with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest [OHCA] and 33 with in-hospital cardiac arrest [IHCA]) in our analysis; more than half of the patients were cooled to 33°C (56.9% in OHCA and 57.6% in IHCA). In univariate logistic regression analysis, Δ-temperature alone did not appear to be statistically associated with mortality or neurologic outcomes regardless of target temperature. In exploratory analysis, longer time from TTM initiation-to-target was associated with worse neurological outcomes in the 33°C target (odds ratio = 0.996, 95% confidence interval = 0.992-1.000). Further research investigating the impact of hypothalamic dysregulation and Δ-temperature as well as the rate of cooling may be warranted to elucidate additional factors contributing to outcomes after cardiac arrest. In addition, our study population was noted to have a higher proportion of Asians and Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders, with a potential disparity in outcomes. Future studies may be warranted to ensure generalizability of TTM protocols and findings across populations.

State of the art post-cardiac arrest care: evolution and future of post cardiac arrest care

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a leading cause of mortality. In the pre-hospital setting, bystander response with cardiopulmonary resuscitation and the use of publicly available automated external defibrillators have been associated with improved survival. Early in-hospital treatment still focuses on emergency coronary angiography for selected patients. For patients remaining comatose, temperature control to avoid fever is still recommended, but former hypothermic targets have been abandoned. For patients without spontaneous awakening, the use of a multimodal prognostication model is key. After discharge, follow-up with screening for cognitive and emotional disabilities is recommended. There has been an incredible evolution of research on cardiac arrest. Two decades ago, the largest trials include a few hundred patients. Today, undergoing studies are planning to include 10-20 times as many patients, with improved methodology. This article describes the evolution and perspectives for the future in post-cardiac arrest care.

Cardiac arrest centres: what do they add?

There are wide regional variations in outcome following resuscitated out of hospital cardiac arrest. These geographical differences appear to be due to hospital infrastructure and provider experience rather than baseline characteristics. It is proposed that post-arrest care be delivered in a systematic fashion by concentrating services in Cardiac Arrest Centres, with greater provider experience, 24-hour access to diagnostics, and specialist treatment to minimise the impact of ischaemia-reperfusion injury and treat the causative pathology. These cardiac arrest centres would provide access to targeted critical care, acute cardiac care, radiology services and appropriate neuro-prognostication. However implementation of cardiac arrest networks with specialist receiving hospitals is complex and requires alignment of pre-hospital care services with those delivered in hospital. Furthermore there are no randomised trial data currently supporting pre-hospital delivery to a Cardiac Arrest Centre and definitions are heterogeneous. In this review article, we propose a universal definition of a Cardiac Arrest Centre and review the current observational data evidence and the potential impact of the ARREST trial.

Therapeutic Hypothermia Following Cardiac Arrest After the TTM2 trial - More Questions Raised Than Answered

For almost 20 years, therapeutic hypothermia has been a cornerstone of modern post-cardiac arrest care lowering mortality, and improvin neurologic outcome compared to conventional therapy. This was challenged by the first TTM-trial in 2013, which did not show a benefit for hypothermia at 33°C compared to controlled normothermia at 36°C. Now, the TTM2 trial showed no benefit of hypothermia compared to fever prevention alone. While TTM1 and TTM2 suggest that hypothermia might not be helpful, a deep dive into the trials reveals that this conclusion does not hold true. Here, we focus on patient selection, suboptimal application of hypothermia, interaction of standard sedation with hypothermia, high incidence of post-arrest fever, and withdrawal of life support based on per-protocol neurologic prognostication in the TTM2-trial. Of particular interest, contemporary trials and registries using intravascular cooling in TTM-like patients repeatedly reported much lower mortality rates than those described in both TTM1 and TTM2.

Management of comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Europe: current treatment practice and adherence to guidelines. A joint survey by the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care (ACVC) of the ESC, the European Resuscitation Council (ERC), the European Society for Emergency Medicine (EUSEM), and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM)

AIMS

International guidelines give recommendations for the management of comatose out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survivors. We aimed to investigate adherence to guidelines and disparities in the treatment of OHCA in hospitals in Europe.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A web-based, multi-institutional, multinational survey in Europe was conducted using an electronic platform with a predefined questionnaire developed by experts in post-resuscitation care. The survey was disseminated to all members of the societies via email, social media, websites, and newsletters in June 2021. Of 252 answers received, 237 responses from different units were included and 166 (70%) were from cardiac arrest centres. First-line vasopressor used was noradrenaline in 195 (83%) and the first-line inotrope was dobutamine in 148 (64%) of the responses. Echocardiography is available 24/7 in 204 (87%) institutions. Targeted temperature management was used in 160 (75%) institutions for adult comatose survivors of OHCA with an initial shockable rhythm. Invasive or external cooling methods with feedback were used in 72 cardiac arrest centres (44%) and 17 (24%) non-cardiac arrest centres (P < 0.0003). A target temperature between 32 and 34°C was preferred by 46 centres (21%); a target between 34 and 36°C by 103 centres (52%); and <37.5°C by 35 (16%). Multimodal neuroprognostication was poorly implemented and a follow-up at 3 months after discharge was done in 71 (30%) institutions.

CONCLUSION

Post-resuscitation care is not well established and varies among centres in European hospitals. Cardiac arrest centres have a higher coherence with guidelines compared with respondents from non-cardiac arrest centres. The overall inconsistency in approaches and deviation from recommendations could be a focus for improvement.

100. Krankenhaus erfolgreich zum Cardiac Arrest Center zertifiziert

Cardiac Arrest Center (CAC) sind zertifizierte Krankenhäuser, die zur Weiterbehandlung prähospital reanimierter Patientinnen und Patienten spezialisiert sind. In Deutschland finden Audits seit Ende 2018 statt. Unter dem Ziel eines bundesweiten, flächendeckenden Ausbaus konnte nun das 100. Krankenhaus als CAC zertifiziert werden. Auch in den neuen internationalen Reanimationsleitlinien 2021 wird die besondere Bedeutung von CAC im neu entwickelten Kapitel „lebensrettende Systeme“ hervorgehoben.

Cardiac Arrest Center – Zertifizierung stärkt Patientenzufluss durch den Rettungsdienst

Hintergrund

Seit 2015 empfehlen die internationalen Reanimationsleitlinien die Implementierung von spezialisierten Krankenhäusern (sog. Cardiac Arrest Center, CAC) für die Versorgung von Patienten mit außerklinischem Herz-Kreislauf-Stillstand.

Ziel

Ziel der Studie war es, den potenziellen Einfluss der Zertifizierung von Kliniken als CAC auf das Einweisungsverhalten von Notärzten und Rettungsfachpersonal bei prähospital reanimierten Patienten zu untersuchen.

Methoden

Eine webbasierte anonyme Befragung mit 20 Items wurde vom 15.05. bis zum 15.06.2018 in Deutschland durchgeführt. Zielgruppen waren im Rettungsdienst tätige Notärzte sowie Rettungsfachpersonal.

Wesentliche Ergebnisse

Von 437 Teilnehmern wurden die Ergebnisse von 378 Befragten (n = 292 Notärzte, n = 86 Rettungsfachpersonen) in die statistische Analyse eingeschlossen. 75,1 % (n = 284) gaben an, dass die CAC-Zertifizierung von Krankenhäusern bei ihrem künftigen Einweisungsverhalten von Patienten mit präklinischem Herz-Kreislauf-Stillstand eine Rolle spielen würde. 78,3 % (n = 296) erwarteten, dass die CAC-Zertifizierung zu einer Verbesserung der Patientenversorgung führen wird. 78,8 % (n = 298) befürworteten die Einführung der CAC-Zertifizierung. Die Befragten würden eine zusätzliche Transportzeit von 16,3 min (95 %-KI: 15,2–17,3) akzeptierten, um ein CAC zu erreichen.

Fazit

Die Zertifizierung von Kliniken als CAC hat das Potenzial, die Entscheidung des Rettungsdienstpersonals bei der Zuweisung von Patienten mit einem präklinischen Herz-Kreislauf-Stillstand zu beeinflussen. Aufgrund der limitierten zusätzlich akzeptablen Transportzeit zur Erreichung eines CAC bedarf es eines bundesweiten, engen Netzes zertifizierter Kliniken.

Effect of annual hospital admissions of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients on prognosis following cardiac arrest

Background

Although the prognosis of patients treated at specialized facilities has improved, the relationship between the number of patients treated at hospitals and prognosis is controversial and lacks constancy in those with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). This study aimed to clarify the effect of annual hospital admissions on the prognosis of adult patients with OHCA by analyzing a large cohort.

Methods

The effect of annual hospital admissions on patient prognosis was analyzed retrospectively using data from the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine OHCA registry, a nationwide multihospital prospective database. This study analyzed 3632 of 35,754 patients hospitalized for OHCA of cardiac origin at 86 hospitals. The hospitals were divided into tertiles based on the volume of annual admissions. The effect of hospital volume on prognosis was analyzed using logistic regression analysis with multiple imputation. Furthermore, three subgroup analyses were performed for patients with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) before arrival at the emergency department, patients admitted to critical care medical centers, and patients admitted to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-capable hospitals.

Results

Favorable neurological outcomes 30 days after OHCA for patients overall showed no advantage for medium- and high-volume centers over low-volume centers; Odds ratio (OR) 0.989, (95% Confidence interval [CI] 0.562-1.741), OR 1.504 (95% CI 0.919-2.463), respectively. However, the frequency of favorable neurological outcomes in OHCA patients with ROSC before arrival at the emergency department at high-volume centers was higher than those at low-volume centers (OR 1.955, 95% CI 1.033-3.851).

Conclusion

Hospital volume did not significantly affect the prognosis of adult patients with OHCA. However, transport to a high-volume hospital may improve the neurological prognosis in OHCA patients with ROSC before arrival at the emergency department.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12873-022-00685-7.

Targeted temperature management after out of hospital cardiac arrest: quo vadis?

Targeted temperature management (TTM) has become a cornerstone in the treatment of comatose post-cardiac arrest patients over the last two decades. Belief in the efficacy of this intervention for improving neurologically intact survival was based on two trials from 2002, one truly randomized-controlled and one small quasi-randomized trial, without clear confirmation of that finding. Subsequent large randomized trials reported no difference in outcomes between TTM at 33 vs. 36°C and no benefit of TTM at 33°C as compared with fever control alone. Given that these results may help shape post-cardiac arrest patient care, we sought to review the history and rationale as well as trial evidence for TTM, critically review the TTM2 trial, and highlight gaps in knowledge and research needs for the future. Finally, we provide contemporary guidance for the use of TTM in daily clinical practice.

The association between time to extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation and outcome in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

AIMS

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is considered for potentially reversible out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, the association between time to ECPR and outcome has not been well established.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between June 2014 and December 2017, we enrolled 34 754 OHCA patients in a multicentre, prospective fashion [Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM)-OHCA registry]. After the application of exclusion criteria, 695 OHCA patients who underwent ECPR for cardiac causes were eligible for this study. We investigated the association between the call-to-ECPR interval and favourable neurological outcome (cerebral performance category 1 or 2) at 30 days. Seventy-seven patients (11%) had a favourable neurological outcome at 30 days. The call-to-ECPR intervals in these patients were significantly shorter than in those with an unfavourable neurological outcome [49 (41-58) vs. 58 (48-68) min, respectively, P < 0.001]. A longer call-to-ECPR interval was associated with a smaller proportion of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (P = 0.034) or target temperature management (TTM) (P < 0.001). Stepwise multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that the call-to-ECPR interval was an independent predictor of favourable neurological outcome [odds ratio (OR) 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94-0.99, P = 0.001], as were age, male gender, initial shockable rhythm, transient return of spontaneous circulation in the prehospital setting, arterial pH at hospital arrival, PCI (OR 2.30, 95% CI 1.14-4.66, P = 0.019), and TTM (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.13-4.62, P = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

A shorter call-to-ECPR interval and implementation of PCI and TTM predicted a favourable neurological outcome at 30 days in OHCA patients who underwent ECPR for cardiac causes.

Inter-hospital trends of post-resuscitation interventions and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Singapore

INTRODUCTION

Hospital-based resuscitation interventions, such as therapeutic temperature management (TTM), emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can improve outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We investigated post-resuscitation interventions and hospital characteristics on OHCA outcomes across public hospitals in Singapore over a 9-year period.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study of all OHCA cases that presented to 6 hospitals in Singapore from 2010 to 2018. Data were extracted from the Pan-Asian Resuscitation Outcomes Study Clinical Research Network (PAROS CRN) registry. We excluded patients younger than 18 years or were dead on arrival at the emergency department. The outcomes were 30-day survival post-arrest, survival to admission, and neurological outcome.

RESULTS

The study analysed 17,735 cases. There was an increasing rate of provision of TTM, emergency PCI and ECMO (P<0.001) in hospitals, and a positive trend of survival outcomes (P<0.001). Relative to hospital F, hospitals B and C had lower provision rates of TTM (≤5.2%). ECMO rate was consistently <1% in all hospitals except hospital F. Hospitals A, B, C, E had <6.5% rates of provision of emergency PCI. Relative to hospital F, OHCA cases from hospitals A, B and C had lower odds of 30-day survival (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]<1; P<0.05 for hospitals A-C) and lower odds of good neurological outcomes (aOR<1; P<0.05 for hospitals A-C). OHCA cases from academic hospitals had higher odds ratio (OR) of 30-day survival (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.5) than cases from hospitals without an academic status.

CONCLUSION

Post-resuscitation interventions for OHCA increased across all hospitals in Singapore from 2010 to 2018, correlating with survival rates. The academic status of hospitals was associated with improved survival.

Cardiac arrest centres: what, who, when, and where?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cardiac arrest centres (CACs) may play a key role in providing postresuscitation care, thereby improving outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). There is no consensus on CAC definitions or the optimal CAC transport strategy despite advances in research. This review provides an updated overview of CACs, highlighting evidence gaps and future research directions.

RECENT FINDINGS

CAC definitions vary worldwide but often feature 24/7 percutaneous coronary intervention capability, targeted temperature management, neuroprognostication, intensive care, education, and research within a centralized, high-volume hospital. Significant evidence exists for benefits of CACs related to regionalization. A recent meta-analysis demonstrated clearly improved survival with favourable neurological outcome and survival among patients transported to CACs with conclusions robust to sensitivity analyses. However, scarce data exists regarding 'who', 'when', and 'where' for CAC transport strategies. Evidence for OHCA patients without ST elevation postresuscitation to be transported to CACs remains unclear. Preliminary evidence demonstrated greater benefit from CACs among patients with shockable rhythms. Randomized controlled trials should evaluate specific strategies, such as bypassing nearest hospitals and interhospital transfer.

SUMMARY

Real-world study designs evaluating CAC transport strategies are needed. OHCA patients with underlying culprit lesions, such as those with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or initial shockable rhythms, will likely benefit the most from CACs.

Association of High-Volume Centers With Survival Outcomes Among Patients With Nontraumatic Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Importance

Although high volume of cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a key feature of cardiac arrest centers, which have proven survival benefit, the role of center volume as an independent variable associated with improved outcomes is unclear.

Objective

To assess the association of high-volume centers with survival and neurological outcomes in nontraumatic OHCA.

Data Sources

Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to October 11, 2021, for studies including adult patients with nontraumatic OHCA who were treated at high-volume vs non-high-volume centers.

Study Selection

Randomized clinical trials, nonrandomized studies of interventions, prospective cohort studies, and retrospective cohort studies were selected that met the following criteria: (1) adult patients with OHCA of nontraumatic etiology, (2) comparison of high-volume with low-volume centers, (3) report of a volume-outcome association, and (4) report of outcomes of interest. At least 2 authors independently reviewed each article, blinded to each other's decision.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Data abstraction and quality assessment were independently conducted by 2 authors. Meta-analyses were performed for adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and crude ORs using a random-effects model. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Survival and good neurological outcomes according to the Cerebral Performance Categories Scale at hospital discharge or 30 days.

Results

A total of 16 studies involving 82 769 patients were included. Five studies defined high volume as 40 or more cases of OHCA per year; 3 studies defined high volume as greater than 100 cases of OHCA per year. All other studies differed in definitions. Survival to discharge or 30 days improved with treatment at high-volume centers, regardless of whether aORs (1.28 [95% CI, 1.00-1.64]) or crude ORs (1.43 [95% CI, 1.09-1.87]) were pooled. There was no association between center volume and good neurological outcomes at 30 days or hospital discharge in patients with OHCA (aOR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.77-1.20]).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this meta-analysis and systematic review, care at high-volume centers was associated with improved survival outcomes, even after adjustment for potential confounders, but was not associated with improved neurological outcomes for patients with nontraumatic OHCA. More studies evaluating the relative importance of center volume compared with other variables (eg, the availability of treatment modalities) associated with survival outcomes in patients with OHCA are required.

Chest Compression-Related Flail Chest Is Associated with Prolonged Ventilator Weaning in Cardiac Arrest Survivors

Chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) may be associated with iatrogenic chest wall injuries. The extent to which these CPR-associated chest wall injuries contribute to a delay in the respiratory recovery of cardiac arrest survivors has not been sufficiently explored. In a single-center retrospective cohort study, surviving intensive care unit (ICU) patients, who had undergone CPR due to medical reasons between 1 January 2018 and 30 June 2019, were analyzed regarding CPR-associated chest wall injuries, detected by chest radiography and computed tomography. Among 109 included patients, 38 (34.8%) presented with chest wall injuries, including 10 (9.2%) with flail chest. The multivariable logistic regression analysis identified flail chest to be independently associated with the need for tracheostomy (OR 15.5; 95% CI 2.77−86.27; p = 0.002). The linear regression analysis identified pneumonia (β 11.34; 95% CI 6.70−15.99; p < 0.001) and the presence of rib fractures (β 5.97; 95% CI 1.01−10.93; p = 0.019) to be associated with an increase in the length of ICU stay, whereas flail chest (β 10.45; 95% CI 3.57−17.33; p = 0.003) and pneumonia (β 6.12; 95% CI 0.94−11.31; p = 0.021) were associated with a prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation. Four patients with flail chest underwent surgical rib stabilization and were successfully weaned from the ventilator. The results of this study suggest that CPR-associated chest wall injuries, flail chest in particular, may impair the respiratory recovery of cardiac arrest survivors in the ICU. A multidisciplinary assessment may help to identify patients who could benefit from a surgical treatment approach.

Global variation in the incidence and outcome of emergency medical services witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM OF THE REVIEW

To examine global variation in the incidence and outcomes of emergency medical services (EMS) witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

DATA SOURCES

We systematically reviewed four electronic databases for studies between 1990 and 5th April 2021 reporting EMS-witnessed OHCA populations. Studies were included if they reported sufficient data to calculate the primary outcome of survival to hospital discharge or 30-day survival. Random-effects models were used to pool incidence and survival outcomes, and meta-regression was used to examine sources of heterogeneity. Study quality was appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools.

RESULTS

The search returned 1178 non-duplicate titles of which 66 articles comprising 133,981 EMS-witnessed patients treated by EMS across 33 countries were included. All but one study was observational and only 12 studies (18%) were deemed to be at low risk of bias. The pooled incidence of EMS-treated cases was 4.1 per 100,000 person-years (95% CI: 3.5, 4.7), varying almost 4-fold across continents. The pooled proportion of survivors to hospital discharge or 30-days was 20% overall (95% CI: 18%, 22%; I² = 98%), 43% (95% CI: 37%, 49%; I² = 94%) for initial shockable rhythms and 6% (95% CI: 5%, 8%; I² = 79%) for initial non-shockable rhythms. In the meta-regression analysis, only region and aetiology were significantly associated with survival. When compared to studies from North America, pooled survival was significantly higher in studies from Europe (14% vs. 26%; p = 0.04) and Australasia (14% vs. 31%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We identified significant global variation in the incidence and survival outcome of EMS-witnessed OHCA. Further research is needed to understand the factors contributing to these variations.

Effect of Intra-arrest Transport, Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, and Immediate Invasive Assessment and Treatment on Functional Neurologic Outcome in Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has poor outcome. Whether intra-arrest transport, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), and immediate invasive assessment and treatment (invasive strategy) is beneficial in this setting remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether an early invasive approach in adults with refractory OHCA improves neurologically favorable survival.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Single-center, randomized clinical trial in Prague, Czech Republic, of adults with a witnessed OHCA of presumed cardiac origin without return of spontaneous circulation. A total of 256 participants, of a planned sample size of 285, were enrolled between March 2013 and October 2020. Patients were observed until death or day 180 (last patient follow-up ended on March 30, 2021).

INTERVENTIONS

In the invasive strategy group (n = 124), mechanical compression was initiated, followed by intra-arrest transport to a cardiac center for ECPR and immediate invasive assessment and treatment. Regular advanced cardiac life support was continued on-site in the standard strategy group (n = 132).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was survival with a good neurologic outcome (defined as Cerebral Performance Category [CPC] 1-2) at 180 days after randomization. Secondary outcomes included neurologic recovery at 30 days (defined as CPC 1-2 at any time within the first 30 days) and cardiac recovery at 30 days (defined as no need for pharmacological or mechanical cardiac support for at least 24 hours).

RESULTS

The trial was stopped at the recommendation of the data and safety monitoring board when prespecified criteria for futility were met. Among 256 patients (median age, 58 years; 44 [17%] women), 256 (100%) completed the trial. In the main analysis, 39 patients (31.5%) in the invasive strategy group and 29 (22.0%) in the standard strategy group survived to 180 days with good neurologic outcome (odds ratio [OR], 1.63 [95% CI, 0.93 to 2.85]; difference, 9.5% [95% CI, -1.3% to 20.1%]; P = .09). At 30 days, neurologic recovery had occurred in 38 patients (30.6%) in the invasive strategy group and in 24 (18.2%) in the standard strategy group (OR, 1.99 [95% CI, 1.11 to 3.57]; difference, 12.4% [95% CI, 1.9% to 22.7%]; P = .02), and cardiac recovery had occurred in 54 (43.5%) and 45 (34.1%) patients, respectively (OR, 1.49 [95% CI, 0.91 to 2.47]; difference, 9.4% [95% CI, -2.5% to 21%]; P = .12). Bleeding occurred more frequently in the invasive strategy vs standard strategy group (31% vs 15%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, the bundle of early intra-arrest transport, ECPR, and invasive assessment and treatment did not significantly improve survival with neurologically favorable outcome at 180 days compared with standard resuscitation. However, the trial was possibly underpowered to detect a clinically relevant difference.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01511666.

Direct Transport to Cardiac Arrest Center and Survival Outcomes after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest by Urbanization Level

Current guidelines for post-resuscitation care recommend regionalized care at a cardiac arrest center (CAC). Our objectives were to evaluate the effect of direct transport to a CAC on survival outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs), and to assess interaction effects between CAC and urbanization levels. Adult EMS-treated OHCAs with presumed cardiac etiology between 2015 and 2019 were enrolled. The main exposure was the hospital where OHCA patients were transported by EMS (CAC or non-CAC). The outcomes were good neurological recovery and survival to discharge. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted. Interaction analysis between the urbanization level of the location of arrest (metropolitan or urban/rural area) and the exposure variable was performed. Among the 95,931 study population, 23,292 (24.3%) OHCA patients were transported directly to CACs. Patients in the CAC group had significantly higher likelihood of good neurological recovery and survival to discharge than the non-CAC group (both p < 0.01, aORs (95% CIs): 1.75 (1.63–1.89) and 1.70 (1.60–1.80), respectively). There were interaction effects between CAC and the urbanization level for good neurological recovery and survival to discharge. Direct transport to CAC was associated with significantly better clinical outcomes compared to non-CAC, and the findings were strengthened in OHCAs occurring in nonmetropolitan areas.

Impact of Cardiac Arrest Centers on the Survival of Patients With Nontraumatic Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

The role of cardiac arrest centers (CACs) in out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest care systems is continuously evolving. Interpretation of existing literature is limited by heterogeneity in CAC characteristics and types of patients transported to CACs. This study assesses the impact of CACs on survival in out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest according to varying definitions of CAC and prespecified subgroups.

Methods and Results

Electronic databases were searched from inception to March 9, 2021 for relevant studies. Centers were considered CACs if self‐declared by study authors and capable of relevant interventions. Main outcomes were survival and neurologically favorable survival at hospital discharge or 30 days. Meta‐analyses were performed for adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and crude odds ratios. Thirty‐six studies were analyzed. Survival with favorable neurological outcome significantly improved with treatment at CACs (aOR, 1.85 [95% CI, 1.52–2.26]), even when including high‐volume centers (aOR, 1.50 [95% CI, 1.18–1.91]) or including improved‐care centers (aOR, 2.13 [95% CI, 1.75–2.59]) as CACs. Survival significantly increased with treatment at CACs (aOR, 1.92 [95% CI, 1.59–2.32]), even when including high‐volume centers (aOR, 1.74 [95% CI, 1.38–2.18]) or when including improved‐care centers (aOR, 1.97 [95% CI, 1.71–2.26]) as CACs. The treatment effect was more pronounced among patients with shockable rhythm (P=0.006) and without prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (P=0.005). Conclusions were robust to sensitivity analyses, with no publication bias detected.

Conclusions

Care at CACs was associated with improved survival and neurological outcomes for patients with nontraumatic out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest regardless of varying CAC definitions. Patients with shockable rhythms and those without prehospital return of spontaneous circulation benefited more from CACs. Evidence for bypassing hospitals or interhospital transfer remains inconclusive.

Basic life support and systems saving lives

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To describe recent science in basic life support (BLS) after cardiac arrest and how evolving knowledge in resuscitation is changing current guidelines and practices.

RECENT FINDINGS

The core elements of BLS have remained mostly unchanged since 2005 when Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation recommendations were changed from 2 ventilations to 15 compressions and up to three stacked shocks for shockable rhythms, to 30 compressions to 2 ventilations and single shocks. Since 2010, basic life support has largely focused on the importance of providing high-quality CPR for professional and lay rescuers alike. The most recent resuscitation updates has seen an increased focus on the systems perspective. The 'Systems Saving Lives' concept emphasizes the interconnection between community and Emergency Medical Services (EMS). The main changes in current resuscitation practice are within three important basic life support domains: recognition of cardiac arrest, interaction between rescuers and EMS and improving resuscitation quality.

SUMMARY

This review highlights the importance of strengthening both community and emergency medical services efforts to improve outcomes in cardiac arrest. Strategies that enhance the communication and collaboration between lay rescuers and professional resuscitation systems are important new avenues to pursue in developing systems that save more lives.

[Quality indicators and structural requirements for Cardiac Arrest Centers-Update 2021]

Es handelt sich hierbei um ein Update der im Frühjahr 2017 erstmals beschriebenen Qualitätskriterien und strukturellen Voraussetzungen für Cardiac Arrest Zentren auf Basis der ersten Zertifizierungen und Erfahrungen. Die Kriterien wurden angepasst und konkretisiert und zum Teil zur Umsetzbarkeit im klinischen Alltag neu definiert.

European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine guidelines 2021: post-resuscitation care

The European Resuscitation Council (ERC) and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) have collaborated to produce these post-resuscitation care guidelines for adults, which are based on the 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Science with Treatment Recommendations. The topics covered include the post-cardiac arrest syndrome, diagnosis of cause of cardiac arrest, control of oxygenation and ventilation, coronary reperfusion, haemodynamic monitoring and management, control of seizures, temperature control, general intensive care management, prognostication, long-term outcome, rehabilitation and organ donation.

European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Guidelines 2021: Post-resuscitation care

The European Resuscitation Council (ERC) and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) have collaborated to produce these post-resuscitation care guidelines for adults, which are based on the 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Science with Treatment Recommendations. The topics covered include the post-cardiac arrest syndrome, diagnosis of cause of cardiac arrest, control of oxygenation and ventilation, coronary reperfusion, haemodynamic monitoring and management, control of seizures, temperature control, general intensive care management, prognostication, long-term outcome, rehabilitation, and organ donation.