Which is better for pediatric and adult cardiac surgery: del Nido or St. Thomas cardioplegia? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Although recently it has been extended for use in adult cardiac surgery, del Nido cardioplegia was originally indicated for pediatric cardiac surgery. In this meta-analysis, we compare del Nido cardioplegia vs St. Thomas cardioplegia in pediatric and adult cardiac surgery.

Methods

A comprehensive systematic literature review was performed to identify observational and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing del Nido cardioplegia with St. Thomas cardioplegia. An analysis of both random and fixed effects was conducted. The measure of the effect was by the mean difference (MD) and the risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI).

Results

A total of 1893 patients from 12 studies were included (5 RCTs and 7 observational studies). Compared to St. Thomas solution, del Nido cardioplegia was associated with a shorter aortic cross-clamp in adult cardiac surgery (RCT MD - 19.83, 95% CI - 21.89-17.78; observational - 5.85; 95% CI - 11.59, - 0.11 respectively), but no difference in pediatric cardiac surgery. Additionally, del Nido cardioplegia was associated with lower cardiopulmonary bypass time in both adults (observational, MD - 29.15; 95% CI - 31.76-26.55) and pediatric cardiac surgery (RCTs, MD - 7.15; 95% CI - 13.25-1.05). Defibrillation rates were also significantly lower with del Nido cardioplegia group in both adult (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.24-0.50, I2 = 50%) and pediatric cardiac surgery (odds ratio (OR) 0.30, 95% CI 0.18-0.49, I2 = 92%).

Conclusion

In both adults and pediatric cardiac surgery, del Nido cardioplegia helps in lowering cardiopulmonary bypass duration, defibrillation rates, and hospital stay, compared to St. Thomas solution. Among adults, del Nido cardioplegia lessens the aortic cross clamp times with no difference observed in all-cause mortality, intensive care unit stay, or mechanical ventilation.

Recent advancements in pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass technology for better outcomes of pediatric cardiac surgery

Background

Pediatric cardiac surgery is in itself very enigmatic and individualized. Presently, there has been a slew of new developments aimed primarily toward pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass for safer, patient-centered pediatric cardiac surgery. Still, lot of technological challenges need to be resolved, and their safer application in pediatric and neonate patients requires further refinement.

Main body of the abstract

Considering various significant yet unresolved issues of pediatric cardiac bypass, an exhaustive literature search was done on various internet databases with standard keywords. There are various new recent improvements; as the first oxygenator explicitly designed for neonatal patients; pediatric oxygenators with low prime volumes and surface areas that allow flows up to 2 L/min; pediatric oxygenators with integrated arterial filters; and miniature ultrafiltration devices that allow for high rates of ultrafiltrate removal. These advancements can significantly reduce cardiopulmonary bypass circuit surface areas and prime volumes. These advancements could reduce or eliminate the requirement for homologous red blood cells during or after surgery with reduction or eliminate bypass-related hemodilution, and inflammation. Because of the immaturity of the neonatal hemostatic system, conventional coagulation tests alone are insufficient to guide neonatal hemostatic therapy. Myocardial preservation techniques, safe temperature with duration are still debatable and yet to be fully explored.

Short conclusion

This review is based on Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence guidelines to provide a framework for reporting new knowledge to find better management strategy for pediatric cardiac cases.

Initial experience with del Nido cardioplegia solution at a Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Surgery Program in Brazil

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate outcome measures between our standard multidose cardioplegia protocol and a del Nido cardioplegia protocol in congenital heart surgery patients.

METHODS

Retrospective single-center study including 250 consecutive patients that received del Nido cardioplegia (DN group) with a mandatory reperfusion period of 30% of cross clamp time and 250 patients that received a modified St. Thomas' solution (ST group). Groups were matched by age, weight, gender, and Risk Adjustment for Congenital Heart Surgery (RACHS-1) scores. Preoperative hematocrit and oxygen saturation were also recorded. Outcomes analyzed were the vasoactive inotropic score (VIS), lactate, ventilation time, ventricular dysfunction with low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS), intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, bypass and aortic cross-clamp times, and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Both groups were comparable demographically. Statistically significant differences (p ⩽ 0.05) were noted for cardiac dysfunction with LCOS, hematocrit at end of surgery (p = 0.0038), VIS on ICU admission and at end of surgery (p = 0.0111), and ICU LOS (p = 0.00118) with patients in the DN group having more desirable values for those parameters. Other outcome measures did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

In our congenital cardiac surgery population, del Nido cardioplegia strategy was associated with less ventricular dysfunction with LCOS, a lower VIS and decreased ICU LOS compared with patients that received our standard myocardial protection using a modified St. Thomas' solution. Despite the limitation of this study, including its retrospective nature and cohort size, these data supported our transition to incorporate del Nido cardioplegia solution with a mandatory reperfusion period as the preferred myocardial protection method in our program.