An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Predicting Unplanned Intubation Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Risk Factors for Reintubation After Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: Comparative Study of Patients With Cervical Spine Trauma and Patients With Cervical Degenerative Disease

STUDY DESIGN

Single-center retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to compare the postoperative outcomes of anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS) in patients with and without cervical spine trauma.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND

Few papers have addressed airway obstruction after anterior ACSS for patients with cervical spine trauma. This study aimed to compare airway obstruction after ACSS between patients with cervical degenerative disorders and cervical spine injuries and identify the risk factors for unplanned postoperative reintubation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-seven patients who underwent ACSS were enrolled in this retrospective study. There were 52 men and 25 women, with a mean age of 60.3±15.5 years old. The causes of surgery were as follows: 24 cervical spine fractures or dislocations, 12 spinal cord injuries without bony fracture, 19 disc herniations, and 22 myelopathies. The patients' characteristics, operative data, and risk factors for unplanned reintubation within 5 days postoperatively were analyzed using medical records.

RESULTS

Postoperative reintubation was performed in 3 patients (3.9%), all of whom suffered trauma. We further examined risk factors for reintubation in patients in the trauma group. There was no significant difference between the reintubation (R) and nonreintubation (non-R) groups in age, sex, body mass index, amount of blood loss and operation time, preoperative paralysis severity, and the number of fused segments. Patients in group R had significantly higher rates of severe anterior element injury (100% vs. 27.3%, P =0.0011). Airway obstruction due to laryngopharyngeal edema and swelling was confirmed by laryngoscopy and computed tomography images.

CONCLUSIONS

Unplanned reintubation after ACSS occurred at a higher rate in trauma patients than in patients with degenerative disorders. Our results suggested that the severe damage to the anterior element of the cervical spine was associated with postoperative reintubation.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

Level IV.

Limitations in Evaluating Machine Learning Models for Imbalanced Binary Outcome Classification in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review

Clinical prediction models for spine surgery applications are on the rise, with an increasing reliance on machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL). Many of the predicted outcomes are uncommon; therefore, to ensure the models' effectiveness in clinical practice it is crucial to properly evaluate them. This systematic review aims to identify and evaluate current research-based ML and DL models applied for spine surgery, specifically those predicting binary outcomes with a focus on their evaluation metrics. Overall, 60 papers were included, and the findings were reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. A total of 13 papers focused on lengths of stay (LOS), 12 on readmissions, 12 on non-home discharge, 6 on mortality, and 5 on reoperations. The target outcomes exhibited data imbalances ranging from 0.44% to 42.4%. A total of 59 papers reported the model's area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC), 28 mentioned accuracies, 33 provided sensitivity, 29 discussed specificity, 28 addressed positive predictive value (PPV), 24 included the negative predictive value (NPV), 25 indicated the Brier score with 10 providing a null model Brier, and 8 detailed the F1 score. Additionally, data visualization varied among the included papers. This review discusses the use of appropriate evaluation schemes in ML and identifies several common errors and potential bias sources in the literature. Embracing these recommendations as the field advances may facilitate the integration of reliable and effective ML models in clinical settings.

The use of machine learning for predicting candidates for outpatient spine surgery: a review

While spine surgery has historically been performed in the inpatient setting, in recent years there has been growing interest in performing certain cervical and lumbar spine procedures on an outpatient basis. While conducting these procedures in the outpatient setting may be preferable for both the surgeon and the patient, appropriate patient selection is crucial. The employment of machine learning techniques for data analysis and outcome prediction has grown in recent years within spine surgery literature. Machine learning is a form of statistics often applied to large datasets that creates predictive models, with minimal to no human intervention, that can be applied to previously unseen data. Machine learning techniques may outperform traditional logistic regression with regards to predictive accuracy when analyzing complex datasets. Researchers have applied machine learning to develop algorithms to aid in patient selection for spinal surgery and to predict postoperative outcomes. Furthermore, there has been increasing interest in using machine learning to assist in the selection of patients who may be appropriate candidates for outpatient cervical and lumbar spine surgery. The goal of this review is to discuss the current literature utilizing machine learning to predict appropriate patients for cervical and lumbar spine surgery, candidates for outpatient spine surgery, and outcomes following these procedures.

Artificial Intelligence-Driven Prediction Modeling and Decision Making in Spine Surgery Using Hybrid Machine Learning Models

Healthcare systems worldwide generate vast amounts of data from many different sources. Although of high complexity for a human being, it is essential to determine the patterns and minor variations in the genomic, radiological, laboratory, or clinical data that reliably differentiate phenotypes or allow high predictive accuracy in health-related tasks. Convolutional neural networks (CNN) are increasingly applied to image data for various tasks. Its use for non-imaging data becomes feasible through different modern machine learning techniques, converting non-imaging data into images before inputting them into the CNN model. Considering also that healthcare providers do not solely use one data modality for their decisions, this approach opens the door for multi-input/mixed data models which use a combination of patient information, such as genomic, radiological, and clinical data, to train a hybrid deep learning model. Thus, this reflects the main characteristic of artificial intelligence: simulating natural human behavior. The present review focuses on key advances in machine and deep learning, allowing for multi-perspective pattern recognition across the entire information set of patients in spine surgery. This is the first review of artificial intelligence focusing on hybrid models for deep learning applications in spine surgery, to the best of our knowledge. This is especially interesting as future tools are unlikely to use solely one data modality. The techniques discussed could become important in establishing a new approach to decision-making in spine surgery based on three fundamental pillars: (1) patient-specific, (2) artificial intelligence-driven, (3) integrating multimodal data. The findings reveal promising research that already took place to develop multi-input mixed-data hybrid decision-supporting models. Their implementation in spine surgery may hence be only a matter of time.