Association of intra-operative metaphyseal fractures with prosthesis size during hemiarthroplasty of the hip

Outcomes of a hydroxyapatite ceramic-coated femoral stem in primary total hip arthroplasty: a report of excellent survivorship from a single United Kingdom centre

BACKGROUND

Hydroxyapatite (HA) coated femoral stems were introduced to enhance the biological fixation at the implant-bone interface, aiming to increase the longevity and survival of the prostheses. We aimed to assess the long-term outcomes of an HA ceramic (HAC) coated stem in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), assess the stem survival, and clinically evaluate the patients using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and radiological evaluation of stem osseointegration.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a prospective evaluation of a retrospective cohort of 385 patients (442 hips) who underwent primary THA between June 2008 and December 2018. The mean age was 63.83 years (range, 30-82 years). During the follow-up duration, 23 patients died, and 36 patients (38 hips) were lost to follow-up. Prospective data collected for 326 patients (381 hips) was used to evaluate stem survival with the Kaplan-Meier method using aseptic loosening or any revision as the endpoint. Clinical evaluation was done using the EuroQol five-dimension (EQ-5D) scoring system and PROMs using the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and Merle D'Aubigne Postel (MDP) score. Radiological assessments were performed using the Engh radiological criteria for stem osteointegration.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up duration was 9.39 years (range, 4-14.5 years). The survival of the HAC-coated femoral stem was 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 96.7-100%) at 14 years with aseptic loosening as the endpoint, and 98.9% (CI, 96.7-100%) at 14 years with stem revision for any reason as the endpoint. The mean OHS was 44.5 (range, 30-48), and the mean MDP score was 15.87 (range, 10-18). Radiological evaluations showed full osseointegration of all stems.

CONCLUSION

This HAC-coated femoral stem has shown excellent survivorship, functional outcomes, and full osseointegration at the final follow-up.

Impact of Intraoperative Femoral Fractures During Cemented Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures

BACKGROUND

There have been several studies on intraoperative femoral fractures (IFFs) during primary total hip arthroplasty, but it is not well understood how this complication affects the patient population undergoing cemented hemiarthroplasty. This study aimed to analyze the impact of IFFs sustained during cemented hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of all patients who were treated for Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association 31B fractures with cemented hemiarthroplasty between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2021, at a single academic level 1 trauma center. An initial cohort was constructed of all patients who sustained an IFF during their surgery, yielding 31 patients after excluding those who sustained a pathologic fracture or had incomplete data. These patients were matched 1:2 on age, sex, and body mass index to patients in a control cohort. The primary outcome measure was implant failure. Secondary outcome measures included complications, all-cause mortality, and radiographic outcomes (subsidence, femoral component loosening, acetabular wear, and heterotopic ossification) postoperatively.

RESULTS

Subsequent implant revision was required in 3.2% (n = 1) of patients who sustained an IFF and 1.6% (n = 1) of patients who did not. After adjusting for comorbidities, there was no observed excess risk of implant failure in the fracture cohort when compared to the control cohort (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.30, P = 0.740). There was no observed excess risk of morbidity (HR = 0.69, P = 0.621) or all-cause mortality (HR = 0.23, P = 0.330). Radiographic outcomes also did not significantly differ between the 2 cohorts (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative fractures during cemented hemiarthroplasty do not contribute to an increased risk of secondary surgery, morbidity, or mortality after surgery. They also do not adversely affect radiographic outcomes postoperatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Retrospective Comparative Study.

Periprosthetic fracture following arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: is a cemented stem protective?

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFF) carry significant morbidity following arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture (FNF). This study assessed fracture complications following arthroplasty for FNF and the effect of cement fixation of the femoral component on intraoperative and post-operative PFF.

METHODS

Between February 2014 and September 2021, 740 patients with a FNF who underwent arthroplasty were analyzed for demographics, surgical management, use of cement for fixation of the femoral component, and subsequent PFF. Variables were compared with Mann-Whitney or Chi-square as appropriate. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess independent risk factors associated with intraoperative or post-operative PFF.

RESULTS

There were 163 THAs (41% cemented) and 577 HAs (95% cemented). There were 28 PFFs (3.8%): 18 post-operative and 10 intraoperative. Fewer post-operative PFFs occurred with cemented stems (1.63% vs. 6.30%, p = 0.002). Mean time from surgery to presentation with post-operative PFF was 14 months (0-45 months). Mean follow-up time was 10.3 months (range: 0-75.7 months). In multivariate regression, use of cement and THA was independently associated with decreased post-operative PFF (cement: OR 0.112, 95% CI 0.036-0.352, p < 0.001 and THA: OR 0.249, 95% CI 0.064-0.961, p = 0.044). More intraoperative fractures occurred during THA (3.68% vs. 0.69%, p = 0.004) and non-cemented procedures (5.51% vs. 0.49%, p < 0.001). In multivariate regression, use of cement was protective against intraoperative fracture (OR 0.100, CI 0.017-0.571, p = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with a FNF treated with arthroplasty, cementing the femoral component is associated with a lower risk of intraoperative and post-operative PFF. Choice of procedure may be based on patient factors and surgeon preference.

Intraoperative periprosthetic femur fracture during bipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures

INTRODUCTION

We aim to review the incidence and risk factors for the development of intraoperative periprosthetic femur fractures while performing a bipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced neck of femur fractures. Our secondary aim is to characterize the types of intraoperative periprosthetic fractures, the steps leading to the fractures, and the salvage treatments instituted.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

271 patients treated with bipolar hemiarthroplasty after traumatic displaced femoral neck fractures were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic data, co-morbidities, vitamin D level, consumption of steroids, ASA score, surgical approach, surgeon experience, use of cemented or uncemented implants, proximal femur morphology, and types of anaesthesia were analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

There were 28 patients (10.3%) with intraoperative periprosthetic femur fractures. We found two significant independent risk factors which were the use of uncemented prosthesis (OR 4.15; 95% CI 1.65-10.46; p = 0.003) and Dorr type C proximal femurs (Dorr A OR 3.6; 95% CI 1.47-8.82; p = 0.005). In addition, patients with Dorr type C proximal femurs who underwent uncemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty were more likely to sustain an intraoperative periprosthetic fracture (14(73.7%) out of 19 patients; p = 0.002). There were no significant differences found in other risk factors. The most common location for these fractures was at the greater trochanter at 11 (39.3%) cases. Majority of them, 15 (53.6%), had intraoperative fractures during trial implant insertion and reduction.

CONCLUSION

The overall incidence of intraoperative periprosthetic femur fractures during hemiarthroplasty for displaced neck of femur fractures was 10.3%. The incidence was significantly higher for uncemented (14.7%) when compared to cemented prosthesis (5.4%) and the greater trochanter was the commonest area for periprosthetic fractures during trial implant insertion and reduction. Uncemented prosthesis and Dorr type C proximal femurs were two significant independent risk factors contributing to intraoperative periprosthetic fractures. By identifying these risk factors, surgeons can take ample precautions to prevent complications.

Predictors of Intraoperative Fractures during Hemiarthroplasty for the Treatment of Fragility Hip Fractures

Background

The aim of our study was to determine the rate and preoperative predictors of intraoperative fracture (IOF) during hip hemiarthroplasty (HA) in patients who have sustained a fragility hip fracture injury.

Methods

We reviewed 626 patients who underwent HA at our institution using the National Hip Fracture Database. Various patient- and surgery-related data including demographic information, cement usage, surgeon grade, time to surgery, and operative duration were collected. The metaphyseal diaphyseal index and modified canal bone ratio were measured on preoperative radiographs. We compared patients with and without IOF with respect to all variables collected. Multivariate regression modeling was used to identify significant preoperative risk factors for IOF.

Results

There was a 7% incidence of IOF in our cohort exclusively comprising of Vancouver A fractures. The majority of these complications were treated nonoperatively (52%). There was no statistically significant difference with respect to cement usage, surgeon grade, operative duration, time to surgery, and radiographic parameters collected. Increasing age was found to be the most significant preoperative risk factor for predicting IOF (p = 0.024, overall relative risk = 1.06).

Conclusions

Our identified predictor of increasing age is nonmodifiable and illustrates the importance of meticulous surgical technique in older patients. Furthermore, its independence from fixation methods or prosthesis design as a predictor of IOF may support using an uncemented prosthesis in patients at risk from cement implantation.

Periprosthetic femoral fractures and trying to avoid them: what is the contribution of femoral component design to the increased risk of periprosthetic femoral fracture?

AIMS

Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFF) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) are devastating complications that are associated with functional limitations and increased overall mortality. Although cementless implants have been associated with an increased risk of PFF, the precise contribution of implant geometry and design on the risk of both intra-operative and post-operative PFF remains poorly investigated. A systematic review was performed to aggregate all of the PFF literature with specific attention to the femoral implant used.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A systematic search strategy of several journal databases and recent proceedings from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons was performed. Clinical articles were included for analysis if sufficient implant description was provided. All articles were reviewed by two reviewers. A review of fundamental investigations of implant load-to-failure was performed, with the intent of identifying similar conclusions from the clinical and fundamental literature.

RESULTS

In total 596 articles were initially identified, with 34 being eligible for analysis. Aggregate analysis of 1691 PFFs in 342 719 primary THAs revealed a significantly higher number of PFFs with cementless femoral implants (p < 0.001). Single-wedge and double-wedge (fit-and-fill) femoral implants were associated with a threefold increase in PFF rates (p < 0.001) compared with anatomical, fully coated and tapered/rounded stems. Within cemented stems, loaded-taper (Exeter) stems were associated with more PFFs than composite-beam (Charnley) stems (p = 0.004). Review of the fundamental literature revealed very few studies comparing cementless component designs.

CONCLUSION

Very few studies within the PFF literature provide detailed implant information. Cementless implants, specifically those of single-wedge and double-wedge, have the highest PFF rates in the literature, with most investigations recommending against their use in older patients with osteoporotic bone. This review illustrates the need for registries and future PFF studies to record implant name and information for future analysis. Furthermore, future biomechanical investigations comparing modern implants are needed to clarify the precise contribution of implant design to PFF risk. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B(1 Supple A):50-9.

Intra-operative fractures in cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty

PURPOSE

To compare patients with or without intra-operative fracture during cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty.

METHODS

Records of 76 men and 202 women who underwent cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures were reviewed. Patients with and without intra-operative fractures and patients with different types of intra-operative fractures were compared.

RESULTS

Two men and 22 women aged 62 to 93 (mean, 80) years sustained intra-operative fractures at the lesser trochanter (n=18), the greater trochanter (n=5), and the subtrochanter (n=1). All 18 lesser trochanteric fractures and 4 of the greater trochanteric fractures were recognised intra-operatively and managed with cerclage wiring (n=21) or conversion to cemented hemiarthroplasty with cerclage wiring (n=1). The remaining 2 fractures were recognised postoperatively on radiographs and managed conservatively or with revision surgery and cerclage wiring and plating on day 4. Intra-operative fractures correlated with female gender (p=0.03) and operative delay to optimise patients (p=0.02), whereas the fracture site correlated with the time of fracture recognition (p=0.01). Postoperatively, 5 patients were allowed partial weight bearing and 18 were instructed to mobilise with a wheelchair for at least 6 weeks. One patient died from an unrelated cause. At one year, 21 patients reported no hip pain and 2 reported minimal pain. 17 could walk with or without aids and 6 were wheelchair-bound.

CONCLUSION

Surgeons should be familiar with the size difference in trial and actual implants used in bipolar hemiarthroplasty in order to better estimate the extent of broaching required. In most patients with an intra-operative fracture, the one-year outcome was not compromised, despite the poorer short-term outcome.

The Dorr type and cortical thickness index of the proximal femur for predicting peri-operative complications during hemiarthroplasty

PURPOSE

To assess the Dorr proximal femoral types and the cortical thickness index for predicting peri-operative complications during hemiarthroplasty.

METHODS

Records of 53 male and 147 female elderly who underwent cemented or uncemented monopolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures were reviewed. Any intra-operative fracture and postoperative dislocation within 30 days was recorded. The cortical thickness index was defined as the ratio of cortical width minus endosteal width to cortical width at a level of 100 mm below the tip of the lesser trochanter. Higher values indicated thicker cortices. The Dorr proximal femur morphology was classified into types A, B, and C.

RESULTS

28 patients were excluded. The proximal femurs of the remaining 172 patients (mean age, 85 years) were categorised as Dorr type A (n=29), type B (n=75), and type C (n=68). The respective mean cortical thickness indices were 1.10, 0.79, and 0.65. Lower cortical thickness indices correlated with worse Dorr types (p<0.05). There were 18 intra-operative fractures; 8 and 10 occurred in Dorr types B and C femurs versus none in Dorr type A femurs (p=0.046). There were 5 postoperative dislocations; 3 and 2 occurred in Dorr types B and C femurs versus none in Dorr type A femurs (p=0.591). The mean cortical thickness index was significantly lower in those with a fracture (n=18) than those without a fracture (n=154) [0.59 vs. 0.81, p=0.0003].

CONCLUSION

Dorr types B and C proximal femurs were at greater risk of intra-operative fracture.

Periprosthetic bone loss following hemiarthroplasty: a comparison between cemented and cementless hip prosthesis

The aim of this prospective randomized clinical study was to evaluate the magnitude of bone mineral changes as well as the clinical results after cemented and cementless haemiarthroplasty (HA) for femoral neck fracture. The study was comprised of 60 patients (mean age 85.2 years); 30 of them underwent cemented HA and 30 cementless HA. All patients underwent osteodensitometry for the purpose of Bone Mineral Density (BMD) evaluation. BMD was measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry test (DEXA scans), which was scheduled at 1 month, 6 months and 1 year after surgery. BMD was evaluated at each of the seven Gruen zones. Harris Hip Score (HHS) at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months was used for evaluation of functional outcome. No difference was found between the two groups of patients in terms hospital stay, morbidity and mortality. The procedure took longer time in group A (cemented HA) compared to group B (cementless HA) (79.03 ± 3.59 vs 68.02 ± 5.97 minutes; p = 0.00). The Harris hip score averaged 76.97 ± 7.49 one year after surgery. At each follow - up examination the HHS was significantly higher in patients with cemented HA. We noted a trend of less intensive BMD reduction in all Gruen zones in group A compared to group B. However, the difference in BMD reduction between these two groups was significant only in zones 2, 3 and 4. Our results support the view that cemented hemiarthroplasty should be used for the management of displaced femoral neck fractures providing better functional outcomes and lower periprosthetic bone loss.

Treatment of femoral neck fractures in elderly patients over 60 years of age - which is the ideal modality of primary joint replacement?

BACKGROUND

Femoral neck fractures in the elderly are frequent, represent a great health care problem, and have a significant impact on health insurance costs. Reconstruction options using hip arthroplasty include unipolar or bipolar hemiarthroplasty (HA), and total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this review is to discuss the indications, limitations, and pitfalls of each of these techniques.

METHODS

The Pubmed database was searched for all articles on femoral neck fracture and for the reconstruction options presented in this review using the search terms "femoral neck fracture", "unipolar hemiarthroplasty", "bipolar hemiarthroplasty", and "total hip arthroplasty". In addition, cross-referencing was used to cover articles eventually undetected by the respective search strategies. The resulting articles were then reviewed with regard to the different techniques, outcome and complications of the distinct reconstruction options.

RESULTS

THA yields the best functional results in patients with displaced femoral neck fractures with complication rates comparable to HA. THA is beneficially implanted using an anterior approach exploiting the internervous plane between the tensor fasciae latae and the sartorius muscles allowing for immediate full weight-bearing. Based on our findings, bipolar hemiarthroplasty, similar to unipolar hemiarthroplasty, cannot restorate neither anatomical nor biomechanical features of the hip joint. Therefore, it can only be recommended as a second line of defense-procedure for patients with low functional demands and limited live expectancy.

CONCLUSIONS

THA is the treatment of choice for femoral neck fractures in patients older than 60 years. HA should only be implanted in patients with limited life expectancy.