Rajesh GN, Shyam Lakshman SG, Vellani H, Sajeev CG, Thomas B. Strain patterns in primary mitral regurgitation due to rheumatic heart disease and mitral valve prolapse.
Indian Heart J 2021;
73:85-90. [PMID:
33714415 PMCID:
PMC7961262 DOI:
10.1016/j.ihj.2020.11.010]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2020] [Revised: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 11/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
Left atrial (LA) and left ventricular (LV) remodelling are the adaptive changes that occur in primary mitral regurgitation (MR) and are related to its clinical outcomes. Despite the pathophysiological differences in MR in rheumatic heart disease (RHD) and mitral valve prolapse (MVP), whether the pattern of LV and LA remodelling is different between the two conditions remains unknown. Hence, we compared the LA and LV strain pattern in MR due to RHD, the predominant etiology in developing countries topatients with MVP and age and sex-matched controls.
METHODS
A total of 50 patients of severe MR which included 30 MVP MR and 20 RHD MR were assessed by strain imaging by speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) and were compared with age and sex-matched controls. 2D STE was used for LA and 3D STE was used for LV strain analysis. LA and LV strain parameters were compared between MVP MR and RHD MR groups.
RESULTS
30 patients with MVP and 20 with RHD were studied. 60% (n = 30) were symptomatic. Mean GLS was -17.2 ± 4.4% compared to -20 ± 3.2% among controls and mean LA strain was 17.35 ± 10.3% compared to 51.34 ± 11.5% among controls which were significantly lower (both p < 0.01). No significant difference in LA strain and GLS was found between MVP and RHD subgroups (LA strain 20.45 ± 11.9% and 14.63 ± 8.85%; p = 0.08; GLS - 18.25 ± 4.3% and-16.2 ± 4.6%; p = 0.12). PALS in the RHD group was lower compared to MVP(p = 0.08) which showed a trend towards significance. LV strain parameters showed no significant difference among the MVP and RHD groups.
CONCLUSION
LA and LV strain parameters showed no significant difference in MR due to either RHD or MVP. There was a trend towards lower LA strain in RHD which needs validation with large multicentric studies. The current strain parameters from MVP with the prognostic value may be applied to MR of RHD etiology, pending confirmation of our results by other groups.
Collapse