Polymorphisms in the IL10 but not in the IL1beta and IL4 genes are associated with inhibitor development in patients with hemophilia A

Mutational landscape, inhibitor development, and health-care burden in non-severe haemophilia A: A single-centre Australian experience

AIM

To characterise non-severe haemophilia A (HA) patients enrolled on the Australian Bleeding Disorders Registry (ABDR) treated through a state-wide Haemophilia Treatment Centre (HTC) with respect to their mutational profile, inhibitor risk and health-care burden.

METHOD

We conducted a single-centre observational study of all non-severe HA patients treated at the Alfred Health HTC registered on the ABDR as of the 26th July 2023. Data were extracted from the ABDR and electronic medical record (EMR) regarding demographics, severity, genetic testing, treatment, inhibitors, bleeding events and procedures. Inhibitor risk was calculated as a function of exposure days (EDs) of FVIII replacement.

RESULTS

There were 289 non-severe HA patients treated at the Alfred HTC registered on the ABDR as of July 2023, all of whom were adult patients aged > 18 years old. Genotyping had been performed in 228/289 (78.9%). Of the inhibitor analysis population, 14/193 (7.3%) had an inhibitor. The cumulative incidence of inhibitor development at 75 EDs was 31% (95% CI 13%-46%). The median cost of bypassing agents per inhibitor patient was $57,087.50/year.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate a relatively high inhibitor prevalence and incidence risk in non-severe HA compared to previously published work, although this may partly reflect a smaller population size. High rates of genotyping have allowed representative mutational characterisation. The burden of care imposed by non-severe HA in terms of bleeding events, procedures and bypassing agent cost is larger than expected, particularly within the inhibitor population.

Immune gene polymorphisms associated with poor response to platelet transfusion and recombinant factor VII administration in Glanzmann thrombasthenia

INTRODUCTION

Poor response to platelet and recombinant factor VII administration is a major problem in patients with Glanzmann Thrombasthenia (GT). The risk factors associated with poor response to treatment in these patients are unknown. Some genetic variations of cytokines may contribute to therapy resistance.

AIMS

We evaluated, for the first time, whether genetic polymorphisms on cytokine genes are related to poor treatment response in GT patients.

METHODS

We enrolled 30 patients with GT (15 resistant and 15 non-resistant) and 100 healthy controls. Gene polymorphisms of IL-10 and TNF-α were analysed using TaqMan Realtime PCR, and IL-1, IL-1R1 and IL-1RN were investigated with the RFLP method. In-silico analyses were performed to predict the potential impact of these polymorphisms.

RESULTS

In the resistant group, all patients had a variant of the IL-10 gene at the -1082 position (rs1800896), with a GG genotype that was significantly more frequent than the non-resistant group. Analysis between healthy controls and GT patients revealed a probable correlation between rs3783550, rs3783553, rs3917356 and rs2234463 and GT. The In-silico study indicated that TNF-α rs1800629 and IL-10 rs1800896 polymorphisms result in different allelic expressions which may contribute to poor response to therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that polymorphisms in the IL-10 and IL-1 receptor antagonist genes may play a role in poor therapy response in GT patients. In addition, some polymorphisms in IL-1α, IL1-β, IL-1R1 and IL-R antagonists might be involved in the GT progression.

Interleukin 10, but not tumor necrosis factor-alpha, gene variations are associated with factor VII inhibitor development

OBJECTIVE

Development of alloantibodies against coagulation factor VII (FVII) is the main therapeutic challenge in severe congenital FVII deficiency. About 7% of patients with severe congenital FVII deficiency develop an inhibitor against FVII. In this research, the relationship between interleukin (IL)-10 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF)-α gene variants and inhibitor development was evaluated for a group of Iranian patients with severe congenital factor VII deficiency.

METHODS

Patients with FVII deficiency were divided into 2 groups: 6 cases and 15 controls. Genotyping was performed using the amplification-refractory mutation system polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

We found that IL-10 rs1800896 A>G gene variant is associated with the risk of FVII inhibitor development (OR = 0.077, 95% CI = 0.016-0.380, P = .001), whereas the TNFα-rs1800629G>A variant has no relation with inhibitor development in severe FVII deficiency.

CONCLUSION

The results show that the IL-10 rs1800896 A>G variant increases the risk of developing an inhibitor in patients with severe congenital FVII deficiency.

Immunogenicity of Therapeutic Biological Modalities - Lessons from Hemophilia A Therapies

The introduction and development of biologics such as therapeutic proteins, gene-, and cell-based therapy have revolutionized the scope of treatment for many diseases. However, a significant portion of the patients develop unwanted immune reactions against these novel biological modalities, referred to as immunogenicity, and no longer benefit from the treatments. In the current review, using Hemophilia A (HA) therapy as an example, we will discuss the immunogenicity issue of multiple biological modalities. Currently, the number of therapeutic modalities that are approved or recently explored to treat HA, a hereditary bleeding disorder, is increasing rapidly. These include, but are not limited to, recombinant factor VIII proteins, PEGylated FVIII, FVIII Fc fusion protein, bispecific monoclonal antibodies, gene replacement therapy, gene editing therapy, and cell-based therapy. They offer the patients a broader range of more advanced and effective treatment options, yet immunogenicity remains the most critical complication in the management of this disorder. Recent advances in strategies to manage and mitigate immunogenicity will also be reviewed.

A machine learning approach for identifying variables associated with risk of developing neutralizing antidrug antibodies to factor VIII

A key unmet need in the management of hemophilia A (HA) is the lack of clinically validated markers that are associated with the development of neutralizing antibodies to Factor VIII (FVIII) (commonly referred to as inhibitors). This study aimed to identify relevant biomarkers for FVIII inhibition using Machine Learning (ML) and Explainable AI (XAI) using the My Life Our Future (MLOF) research repository. The dataset includes biologically relevant variables such as age, race, sex, ethnicity, and the variants in the F8 gene. In addition, we previously carried out Human Leukocyte Antigen Class II (HLA-II) typing on samples obtained from the MLOF repository. Using this information, we derived other patient-specific biologically and genetically important variables. These included identifying the number of foreign FVIII derived peptides, based on the alignment of the endogenous FVIII and infused drug sequences, and the foreign-peptide HLA-II molecule binding affinity calculated using NetMHCIIpan. The data were processed and trained with multiple ML classification models to identify the top performing models. The top performing model was then chosen to apply XAI via SHAP, (SHapley Additive exPlanations) to identify the variables critical for the prediction of FVIII inhibitor development in a hemophilia A patient. Using XAI we provide a robust and ranked identification of variables that could be predictive for developing inhibitors to FVIII drugs in hemophilia A patients. These variables could be validated as biomarkers and used in making clinical decisions and during drug development. The top five variables for predicting inhibitor development based on SHAP values are: (i) the baseline activity of the FVIII protein, (ii) mean affinity of all foreign peptides for HLA DRB 3, 4, & 5 alleles, (iii) mean affinity of all foreign peptides for HLA DRB1 alleles), (iv) the minimum affinity among all foreign peptides for HLA DRB1 alleles, and (v) F8 mutation type.

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α-308 gene polymorphism in children of Haemophilia A

Hemophilias are the most common X-linked inherited blood diseases that, if not properly treated, can cause lifelong debilitations. The challenges and problems in babies differ from that in older kids and adults. Blood loss conditions continue to dominate as diagnostic triggers in children, but the locations of blood loss vary with age. The TNF-α-308 gene polymorphism in children with moderate to severe hemophilia correlates with genetic background and with the clinical phenotype of the cases. This study was a case control conducted in fifty hemophilic and fifty age- and sex-matched healthy cases from September 2020 to October 2021. Results; a significant change was found among positive and negative inhibitors regarding the number of factors eight exposure days >20 days (in positive inhibitors was 59.3% compared to adverse inhibitors 27.8%). Conclusion: The (TNF-)308 gene polymorphism is significantly correlated with inhibitor progress in severe Haemophilia A cases. TNF-Alpha gene might be of use as a biomarker as well possible immune response modulator in Haemophilia A patients receiving substitute treatment. Keywords: polymorphism, TNF-α -308Haemophilia, inhibitor, prophylaxis - intracranial hemorrhage and pediatrics.

Genome-Wide Association Study and Gene-Based Analysis of Participants With Hemophilia A and Inhibitors in the My Life, Our Future Research Repository

Introduction

Up to 30% of individuals with hemophilia A develop inhibitors to replacement factor VIII (FVIII), rendering the treatment ineffective. The underlying mechanism of inhibitor development remains poorly understood. The My Life, Our Future Research Repository (MLOF RR) has gathered F8 and F9 mutational information, phenotypic data, and biological material from over 11,000 participants with hemophilia A (HA) and B as well as carriers enrolled across US hemophilia treatment centers, including over 5,000 whole-genome sequences. Identifying genes associated with inhibitors may contribute to our understanding of why certain patients develop those neutralizing antibodies.

Aim and Methods

Here, we performed a genome-wide association study and gene-based analyses to identify genes associated with inhibitors in participants with HA from the MLOF RR.

Results

We identify a genome-wide significant association within the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) locus in participants with HA with F8 intronic inversions. HLA typing revealed independent associations with the HLA alleles major histocompatibility complex, class II, DR beta 1 (HLA DRB1*15:01) and major histocompatibility complex, class II, DQ beta 1 (DQB1*03:03). Variant aggregation tests further identified low-frequency variants within GRID2IP (glutamate receptor, ionotropic, delta 2 [GRID2] interacting protein 1) significantly associated with inhibitors.

Conclusion

Overall, our study confirms the association of DRB1*15:01 with FVIII inhibitors and identifies a novel association of DQB1*03:03 in individuals with HA carrying intronic inversions of F8. In addition, our results implicate GRID2IP, encoding GRID2-interacting protein, with the development of inhibitors, and suggest an unrecognized role of this gene in autoimmunity.

Clinical conditions and risk factors for inhibitor-development in patients with haemophilia: A decade-long prospective cohort study in Japan, J-HIS2 (Japan Hemophilia Inhibitor Study 2)

BACKGROUND

Inhibitor-development is a serious complication in patients with haemophilia (PwH). Previous studies reported that therapeutic and genetic factors could be associated with these alloantibodies. Relevant clinical features such as genetic-background and different treatment regimens in Japan remain unclear, however.

AIMS

To analyse a nation-wide Japanese registry for PwH, and to examine risk factors for inhibitor-development.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Newly diagnosed patients with haemophilia A (PwHA) or haemophilia B (PwHB) without inhibitors after 2007, and with treatment records traceable from 0 to 75 exposure days (ED), were enrolled in the Japan Hemophilia Inhibitor Study 2 (J-HIS2) initiated in 2008. Of 417 patients (340 PwHA, 77 PwHB) from 46 facilities, 83 (76 PwHA, 7 PwHB) were recorded with inhibitors by July 2020. Inhibitors were observed in 31.0% of severe PwHA, 8.0% moderate and 1.6% mild and in 17.1% of severe PwHB. The majority of inhibitors (89.7% in severe PwHA and 71.4% in severe PwHB) were detected on or before 25ED (median 12ED in PwHA and 19ED in PwHB). Genotyping in these severe patients identified an association between inhibitor-development and null variants of F8 (P < .01) or F9 (P < .05). A lower incidence of inhibitors was recorded in severe PwHA treated with prophylaxis than in those treated on-demand (P < .01). A past-history of intracranial-haemorrhage appeared to be associated with inhibitor-development, while FVIII-concentrates infusion and routine vaccination on the same day was not related to inhibitor-development.

CONCLUSION

The J-HIS2 study has identified significant clinical variables associated with inhibitor-development in Japanese PwH, consistent with other global studies.

Neutralizing Antibodies Against Factor VIII Can Occur Through a Non-Germinal Center Pathway

Humoral immunity to factor VIII (FVIII) represents a significant challenge for the treatment of patients with hemophilia A. Current paradigms indicate that neutralizing antibodies against FVIII (inhibitors) occur through a classical CD4 T cell, germinal center (GC) dependent process. However, clinical observations suggest that the nature of the immune response to FVIII may differ between patients. While some patients produce persistent low or high inhibitor titers, others generate a transient response. Moreover, FVIII reactive memory B cells are only detectable in some patients with sustained inhibitor titers. The determinants regulating the type of immune response a patient develops, let alone how the immune response differs in these patients remains incompletely understood. One hypothesis is that polymorphisms within immunoregulatory genes alter the underlying immune response to FVIII, and thereby the inhibitor response. Consistent with this, studies report that inhibitor titers to FVIII differ in animals with the same F8 pathogenic variant but completely distinct backgrounds; though, how these genetic disparities affect the immune response to FVIII remains to be investigated. Given this, we sought to mechanistically dissect how genetics impact the underlying immune response to FVIII. In particular, as the risk of producing inhibitors is weakly associated with differences in HLA, we hypothesized that genetic factors other than HLA influence the immune response to FVIII and downstream inhibitor formation. Our data demonstrate that FVIII deficient mice encoding the same MHC and F8 variant produce disparate inhibitor titers, and that the type of inhibitor response formed associates with the ability to generate GCs. Interestingly, the formation of antibodies through a GC or non-GC pathway does not appear to be due to differences in CD4 T cell immunity, as the CD4 T cell response to an immunodominant epitope in FVIII was similar in these mice. These results indicate that genetics can impact the process by which inhibitors develop and may in part explain the apparent propensity of patients to form distinct inhibitor responses. Moreover, these data highlight an underappreciated immunological pathway of humoral immunity to FVIII and lay the groundwork for identification of biomarkers for the development of approaches to tolerize against FVIII.

BAFF rs9514828 gene polymorphism and the risk of the development of inhibitors in children with severe haemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

Haemophilia A (HA) is an x-linked recessive disease due to deficiency of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). The development of neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) against infused FVIII is a major concern. B cell activating factor (BAFF) has been implicated in several autoimmune diseases.

AIM

We aimed to evaluate the possible association of BAFF rs9514828 gene polymorphism and the risk of the development of FVIII inhibitor in children with severe HA.

METHODS

This cohort study was carried out on 100 newly diagnosed boys with severe HA who were never treated before with FVIII concentrate. Assessment of serum levels of BAFF and BAFF rs9514828 genotyping at first diagnosis was performed and the patients were followed up for the completion of a total of 50 exposure days or the development of inhibitors whichever occurred first. The patients were divided as positive or negative according to the presence or absence of inhibitors.

RESULTS

The risk allele for BAFF rs9514828 (T) was significantly more frequent in the inhibitor positive patients than the inhibitor negative patients (P = .003). In addition, CT+TT genotypes were associated with increased risk of FVIII inhibitor development. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis showed that BAFF levels could predict the development of FVIII inhibitors at a cut-off value of ≥ .92 with a sensitivity of 85.9% and a specificity of 80.2%.

CONCLUSION

BAFF rs9514828 gene polymorphism could be independent risk factor and elevated BAFF levels might be useful prognostic marker for the development of FVIII inhibitor in newly diagnosed children with severe HA.

Genetic variants at the chromosomal region 2q21.3 underlying inhibitor development in patients with severe haemophilia A

Introduction

Inhibitor development affects about 30% of patients with severe haemophilia A (HA) and results from different environmental and genetic risk factors. Previously, we identified the missense variant rs3754689 in the LCT gene linked with this predisposition. Since rs3754689 variant is benign and is located in a conserved haplotype region, we hypothesized that the association signal captured by this variant is located in coinherited, neighbouring genes.

Aim

To identify novel genetic risk factors associated with inhibitor development in coding regions of R3HDM1, UBXN4, CXCR4, MCM6, DARS and miR128‐1 genes.

Methods

Targeted sequencing was performed in 246 severe HA patients (72 with and 174 without inhibitor): 181 previously and 65 newly enrolled.

Results

Forty‐one common and 152 rare variants passed the quality control. Logistic regression analysis of common variants identified rs3754689 and four additional variants (.011 < P < .047; FDR ranging .2‐.38). Logistic regression analysis performed only in the 220 Italian patients showed similar results (.004 < P < .05; FDR ranging .12‐.22). Three of these variants (rs3213892 and rs3816155 in the LCT intron 13 and rs961360 in the R3HDM1 intron10‐exon11 junction) may affect the expression of UBXN4 and R3HDM1, respectively. Rare variants did not show association with inhibitor development. Identified variants were not replicated in the multi‐ethnic SIPPET cohort of 230 severe HA patients.

Conclusion

Due to the limited sample size that may be responsible of the high FDR values, we could not confirm with certainty the analysed association. Further evaluation of the expression levels of analysed genes will confirm or not their role in inhibitor development.

Role of Regulatory Cells in Immune Tolerance Induction in Hemophilia A

The main complication of hemophilia A treatment is the development of neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) against factor VIII (FVIII). Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the prescribed treatment for inhibitor eradication, although its working mechanism remains unresolved. To clarify this mechanism, we compared blood samples of hemophilia A patients with and without inhibitors for presence of immunoregulatory cells and markers, including regulatory B-cells (Bregs), regulatory T-cells (Tregs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and expression of regulatory markers on T-cells (programmed cell death protein 1 [PD1], inducable T-cell costimulator, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 [CTLA4]), by use of flow cytometry. By cross-sectional analysis inhibitor patients (N = 20) were compared with inhibitor-negative (N = 28) and ex-inhibitor (N = 17) patients. In another longitudinal study, changes in immunoregulatory parameters were evaluated during ITI (N = 12) and compared with inhibitor-negative hemophilia A patients (N = 36). The frequency of Bregs, but not of Tregs nor MDSCs, was significantly reduced in inhibitor patients (3.2%) compared with inhibitor-negative (5.9%) and ex-inhibitor patients (8.9%; P < 0.01). CTLA4 expression on T-cells was also reduced (mean fluorescence intensity 133 in inhibitor versus 537 in inhibitor-negative patients; P < 0.01). Fittingly, in patients followed during ITI, inhibitor eradication associated with increased Bregs, increased Tregs, and increased expression of CTLA4 and PD1 on CD4+ T-cells. In conclusion, inhibitor patients express significantly lower frequency of Bregs and Tregs marker expression, which are restored by successful ITI. Our findings suggest that an existing anti-FVIII immune response is associated with deficits in peripheral tolerance mechanisms and that Bregs and changes in immunoregulatory properties of CD4+ T-cells likely contribute to ITI in hemophilia A patients with inhibitors.

Important decrease in invariant natural killer T, CD4+ regulatory T cells, CD8+ regulatory T cells, gamma-delta T cells, and CD4+ T lymphocytes in HIV-negative patients with hemophilia

Hereditary hemophilias are X-linked inherited bleeding disorders defined as deficiencies of the coagulation factors VIII or IX. They are characterized by easy to provoke or spontaneous bleeding. HIV infection in hemophilic patients is a risk factor for the reduction of CD4+ T cells. There is no information regarding the cellular immune function in HIV-negative patients with hemophilia. To evaluate the number of lymphocyte subsets in adult patients with hemophilia A or B as compared with healthy donors. 39 Adult hemophilics and 27 healthy donors were included. Lymphocyte subsets [CD4 and CD8 T cells, natural killer cells, natural killer T (NKT) cells, invariant NKT (iNKT) cells, gamma-delta T (γδT) cells, type 1 and 2 dendritic cells, CD14 monocytes, CD4 and CD8 regulatory T cells (Tregs), and B cells], were analyzed by flow cytometry. A significant decrease of CD4+ T lymphocytes, γδT cells, iNKT cells, CD4+ and CD8+ Tregs was observed in patients with hemophilia. Those patients having factor VIII inhibitor had the lowest CD4+ Treg and CD8+ Treg counts. CD14 monocytes were increased, as well as iNKT and type 2 dendritic cells in obese-overweight hemophilics. CD4+ lymphocytes, iNKT, γδT cells, and Tregs (CD4+ and CD8+), are significantly decreased in patients with hemophilia. Depletion of Tregs is more important in patients with factor VIII inhibitor. Physicians caring for hemophilia patients should realize that, even when they are not suffering infections frequently, may have early evidence of cellular immunodeficiency.

Spectrum of F8 Genotype and Genetic Impact on Inhibitor Development in Patients with Hemophilia A from Multicenter Cohort Studies (J-HIS) in Japan

Some genetic and treatment-related factors are risk factors for inhibitor development in patients with hemophilia A (PwHA). However, the genotype distribution of the factor VIII gene (F8) and genetic impact on inhibitor development in Japanese PwHA remain unknown. In 2007, the Japan Hemophilia Inhibitor Study 2 (J-HIS2) was organized to establish a nationwide registry system for hemophiliacs and to elucidate risk factors for inhibitor development, designed for prospective investigation following a retrospective study (J-HIS1) which had already finished. Patients, newly diagnosed after January 2007, were enrolled in J-HIS2 and followed up for inhibitor development and clinical environments since 2008 onward. In the present study, F8 genotypes of PwHA were investigated in the patients recruited from the J-HIS2 cohort as well as those with inhibitor from the J-HIS1 cohort. F8 variants identified in 59 PwHA with inhibitor in J-HIS1 were: 20 intron-22 inversions, 5 intron-1 inversions, 9 large deletions, 4 nonsense, 8 missense, 11 small in/del, and 2 splice-site variants. F8 variants identified in 267 (67 with inhibitor) PwHA in J-HIS2 were: 76(28) intron-22 inversions, 3(2) intron-1 inversion, 1(0) duplication, 8(5) large deletions, 21(7) nonsense, 109(7) missense, 40(11) small in/del, and 9(7) splice-site variants. Forty variants were novel. The cumulative inhibitor incidence rate in the severe group with null changes was 42.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 33.7-50.8), higher than that with nonnull changes (15.6% [95%CI: 6.8-27.8]), in J-HIS2. Relative risk for inhibitor development of null changes was 2.89. The spectrum of F8 genotype and genetic impact on inhibitor development in Japanese PwHA were consistent with the previous reports.

Immunogenicity-unwanted immune responses to biological drugs - can we predict them?

INTRODUCTION

Biological agents (BAs) target molecules involved in disease mechanisms and have modified the natural history of several immune-mediated disorders. All BAs are immunogenic, resulting in the formation of antidrug antibodies (ADAs), which can neutralize drug activity leading to loss of response and potential relapse, or serious adverse events such as infusion hypersensitivity reactions. The production of ADAs is the result of a specific adaptive immune response in which T and B cells are involved.

AREAS COVERED

Factors conditioning the immunogenicity of BAs, including drug-, treatment- and patient-related factors are currently the subject of many studies. Among them, a lot of attention is dedicated to define the impact of BAs structure, the effect of targeting (soluble or membrane) molecules, the impact of interruption of therapy as well as the role of genetic (HLA and non-HLA) predisposing factors and disease activity.

EXPERT OPINION

Knowledge of factors capable of influencing the immunogenicity of BAs may help to understand, in a predictive manner and at the single patient level, the presence of risk factors influencing the production of ADAs and their impact on clinical outcomes.

Product type and the risk of inhibitor development in nonsevere haemophilia A patients: a case-control study

Inhibitor development is a major complication of treatment with factor VIII concentrates in nonsevere haemophilia A. It has been suggested that plasma-derived factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates elicit fewer inhibitors than recombinant FVIII concentrates, but studies in severe haemophilia A patients have shown conflicting results. We designed a case-control study to investigate the clinical and genetic risk factors for inhibitor development in nonsevere haemophilia A patients. We investigated whether the type of FVIII concentrate was associated with inhibitor development in nonsevere haemophilia A patients. This nested case-control study includes 75 inhibitor patients and 223 controls, from a source population of the INSIGHT study, including all nonsevere haemophilia A patients (FVIII:C 2-40%) that were treated with FVIII concentrates in 33 European and one Australian centre. Cases and controls were matched for date of birth and cumulative number of exposure days (CED) to FVIII concentrate. A conditional logistic regression model was used to calculate unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios. No increased risk for inhibitor development was found for any type of FVIII concentrate; either when comparing recombinant FVIII concentrates to plasma-derived FVIII concentrates (adjusted odds ratio 0·96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0·36-2·52) or for specific types of FVIII concentrates.

Molecular Mechanisms of Inhibitor Development in Hemophilia

The development of neutralizing antibodies in hemophilia is a serious complication of factor replacement therapy. These antibodies, also known as "inhibitors", significantly increase morbidity within the hemophilia population and lower the quality of life for these patients. People with severe hemophilia A have an overall 25-40% lifetime risk of inhibitor development, compared to that of 5-15% lifetime risk in those with moderate/mild hemophilia A. The risk is lower in hemophilia B population (about 1-5%) and occurrence of inhibitors is almost only seen in patients with severe hemophilia B. The understanding of the pathophysiological mechanism leading to the development of inhibitors in patients with hemophilia has improved considerably over the last 2 decades. Identification of early biomarkers which predict inhibitor development in previously untreated patients with hemophilia will assist in risk identification and possible early intervention strategies. In this review, we aim to summarize the molecular mechanisms of inhibitor development in hemophilia and to identify potential areas in need of further investigation.

Mechanistic Insights into Factor VIII Immune Tolerance Induction via Prenatal Cell Therapy in Hemophilia A

Purpose of Review

Prenatal stem cell and gene therapy approaches are amongst the few therapies that can promise the birth of a healthy infant with specific known genetic diseases. This review describes fetal immune cell signaling and its potential influence on donor cell engraftment, and summarizes mechanisms of central T cell tolerance to peripherally-acquired antigen in the context of prenatal therapies for Hemophilia A.

Recent Findings

During early gestation, different subsets of antigen presenting cells take up peripherally-acquired, non-inherited antigens and induce the deletion of antigen-reactive T-cell precursors in the thymus, demonstrating the potential for using prenatal cell and gene therapies to induce central tolerance to FVIII in the context of prenatal diagnosis/therapy of Hemophilia A.

Summary

Prenatal cell and gene therapies are promising approaches to treat several genetic disorders including Hemophilia A and B. Understanding the mechanisms of how FVIII-specific tolerance is achieved during ontogeny could help develop novel therapies for HA and better approaches to overcome FVIII inhibitors.

Risk stratification integrating genetic data for factor VIII inhibitor development in patients with severe hemophilia A

Replacement therapy in severe hemophilia A leads to factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors in 30% of patients. Factor VIII gene (F8) mutation type, a family history of inhibitors, ethnicity and intensity of treatment are established risk factors, and were included in two published prediction tools based on regression models. Recently investigated immune regulatory genes could also play a part in immunogenicity. Our objective is to identify bio-clinical and genetic markers for FVIII inhibitor development, taking into account potential genetic high order interactions. The study population consisted of 593 and 79 patients with hemophilia A from centers in Bonn and Frankfurt respectively. Data was collected in the European ABIRISK tranSMART database. A subset of 125 severely affected patients from Bonn with reliable information on first treatment was selected as eligible for risk stratification using a hybrid tree-based regression model (GPLTR). In the eligible subset, 58 (46%) patients developed FVIII inhibitors. Among them, 49 (84%) were “high risk” F8 mutation type. 19 (33%) had a family history of inhibitors. The GPLTR model, taking into account F8 mutation risk, family history of inhibitors and product type, distinguishes two groups of patients: a high-risk group for immunogenicity, including patients with positive HLA-DRB1*15 and genotype G/A and A/A for IL-10 rs1800896, and a low-risk group of patients with negative HLA-DRB1*15 / HLA-DQB1*02 and T/T or G/T for CD86 rs2681401. We show associations between genetic factors and the occurrence of FVIII inhibitor development in severe hemophilia A patients taking into account for high-order interactions using a generalized partially linear tree-based approach.

Polymorphisms in MAPK9 (rs4147385) and CSF1R (rs17725712) are associated with the development of inhibitors in patients with haemophilia A in North China

INTRODUCTION

The formation of neutralizing antibodies (FVIII inhibitors) in haemophilia A patients is an immune response to the deficient factor. This process is multifactorial and includes environmental and genetic factors. Some genetic markers that play a decisive role in the immune response have been identified as risk factors for inhibitor development.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to investigate the association between polymorphisms in several genes involved in the regulation of the immune response and inhibitor development in patients with haemophilia A in North China.

METHODS

We analysed eight SNPs (MAPK9 rs4147385, CSF1R rs17725712, CD44 rs927335, STAT4 rs7574865, IKZF1 rs4917014, ETS1 rs6590330, BANK1 rs17266594 and rs10516487) by Snapshot SNP genotyping assays in 100 haemophilia A patients, including 29 with inhibitors and 71 without inhibitors.

RESULTS

Our results demonstrated that the rs17725712 A allele and the AA homozygous genotype of CSF1R were more frequent in patients with inhibitors. The rs4147385 G allele in MAPK9 was also more frequent in the inhibitor cohort.

CONCLUSION

We confirmed an association of CSF1R rs17725712 and MAPK9 rs4147385 with inhibitor development in haemophilia A patients in North China.

Pathogenic immune response to therapeutic factor VIII: exacerbated response or failed induction of tolerance?

Therapeutic factor VIII is highly immunogenic. Despite intensive research in the last decades, the reasons why 5-30% of patients with hemophilia A (of all severities) develop inhibitory anti-factor VIII antibodies (inhibitors) following replacement therapy remain an enigma. Under physiological conditions, endogenous factor VIII is recognized by the immune system. Likewise, numerous observations indicate that, in hemophilia A patients without inhibitors, exogenous therapeutic factor VIII is immunologically assessed and tolerated. A large part of the research on the immunogenicity of therapeutic factor VIII is attempting to identify the ‘danger signals’ that act as adjuvants to the deleterious anti-factor VIII immune responses. However, several of the inflammatory assaults concomitant to factor VIII administration initially hypothesized as potential sources of danger signals (e.g., bleeding, infection, and vaccination) have been disproved to be such signals. Conversely, recent evidence suggests that cells from inhibitor-negative patients are able to activate anti-inflammatory and tolerogenic mechanisms required to suppress deleterious immune responses, while cells from inhibitor-positive patients are not. Based on the available observations, we propose a model in which all hemophilia A patients develop anti-factor VIII immune responses during replacement therapy irrespective of associated danger signals. We further postulate that the onset of clinically relevant factor VIII inhibitors results from an inability to develop counteractive tolerogenic responses to exogenous factor VIII rather than from an exacerbated activation of the immune system at the time of factor VIII administration. A better understanding of the pathogenesis of neutralizing anti-factor VIII antibodies will have repercussions on the clinical management of patients and highlight new strategies to achieve active immune tolerance to therapeutic factor VIII.

Prevalence of FVIII inhibitors in severe haemophilia A patients: Effect of treatment and genetic factors in an Indian population

INTRODUCTION

Factor replacement therapy in treatment of haemophilia A is complicated by the production of neutralising antibodies known as inhibitors. The formation of inhibitors is multifactorial being associated with both genetic and environmental factors.

AIM

To document the prevalence of inhibitors in severe haemophilia in the community where most patients receive only infrequent episodic replacement therapy and evaluate the factors which could be contributing to it.

METHODS

Community based camps were conducted in different parts of the country. Patients were assessed through a structured questionnaire and blood samples were obtained for laboratory evaluation of inhibitors and defined immunological parameters.

RESULTS

Inhibitors were present in 87/447 (19.5%) of the evaluated patients. High-titre inhibitor (>5 Bethesda Units [BU]) was identified in 31 (35.6%) patients. HLA DRB1-13-positive cases (RR = 2.04; 95% CI 1.06-3.911; P = 0.033) had an increased risk of inhibitor formation which was retained in the high-titre subset. A decreased risk of inhibitor formation was noted with heterozygous IL4-590 C/T allele (RR = 0.22; 95% CI 0.108-0.442: P = 0.000). There were no significant correlations between any of the evaluated environmental factors and the development of inhibitors in this study.

CONCLUSION

The overall prevalence of inhibitors in patients with severe haemophilia A is similar to that reported among patients receiving regular replacement therapy. The data from this study, limited by its retrospective and cross-sectional study design, would suggest that genetic rather than environmental are more likely to impact the development of inhibitors.

Polymorphisms in the TGF-β1 (rs1982037) and IL-2 (rs2069762, rs4833248) genes are not associated with inhibitor development in Iranian patients with hemophilia A

Objectives Development of neutralizing antibodies against factor VIII is the major complication in hemophilia care which makes replacement therapies ineffective. The reports showed that inflammatory cytokines play an important role in inhibitor production. In the present study, the relationship between inhibitor development and the polymorphisms of two cytokine genes was studied in severe hemophiliac patients from Iran. Methods In this case-control study, three polymorphisms of immune regulatory genes [TGF-β (rs1982037) and IL-2 (rs2069762, rs4833248)] were analyzed in 100 Iranian hemophilia A patients divided into 55 inhibitor positive and 45 inhibitor negative patients using Tetra primer ARMS PCR, and DNA sequencing. Results The analysis of polymorphisms in the TGF-β and IL-2 genes showed no association between the genotypes and the production of inhibitors (p > 0.05). Also, comparison of allele frequencies for TGF-β and IL-2 genes between two groups indicated no significant differences associated with the development of FVIII inhibitors (p > 0.05). Discussion In contrast with some reports involving the correlation between polymorphisms of the TGF-β1 and IL-2 genes and inhibitor development in the world, no statistically significant differences in analysis of the alleles and genotypes for TGF-β and IL-2 genes were found between the inhibitor and non-inhibitor Iranian patients. Thus, other genetic markers influencing the immune response to replacement therapy in patients with hemophilia should be identified. Conclusions Regarding our results in molecular predisposition for inhibitor development, further studies of effective genetic markers are required as a prerequisite for the development of novel immunogenic therapeutic approaches in the future.

Tolerogenic properties of the Fc portion of IgG and its relevance to the treatment and management of hemophilia

Hemophilia, or inherited genetic deficiencies in coagulation factors, results in uncontrolled bleeding requiring replacement therapy with recombinant proteins given preventively or on demand. However, a major problem with these approaches is the potential for development of immune responses to the administered proteins due to the underlying genetic deficiency of the factor(s) throughout life. As such, there is great interest in developing strategies that avoid immunogenicity and induce immune tolerance. Recently, recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) and rFIX fused to the crystallizable fragment (Fc) domain of immunoglobulin G (IgG) have been developed as therapeutic agents for hemophilia A and B, respectively. Although it is well known that the possession of an Fc domain confers IgG's longer-lasting circulating half-life, it is not generally appreciated that the Fc domain also confers immunoregulatory properties that are associated with the induction of tolerance. Here, we review some of the latest advances in our understanding of the tolerogenic abilities of IgG Fc and the impact of Fc-fusion proteins of rFVIII on the treatment of hemophilia.

Correlation between HLA haplotypes and the development of antidrug antibodies in a cohort of patients with rheumatic diseases

Introduction

The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between human leukocyte antigen (HLA) haplotypes and the development of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) in a cohort of patients with rheumatic diseases.

Patients and methods

We evaluated the presence of ADAs in 248 patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases after 6 months of treatment with anti-TNF drugs: 26 patients were treated with infliximab (IFX; three with rheumatoid arthritis [RA], 13 with ankylosing spondylitis [AS], 10 with psoriatic arthritis [PsA]); 83 treated with adalimumab (ADA; 24 with RA, 36 with AS, 23 with PsA); 88 treated with etanercept (ETA; 35 with RA, 27 with AS, 26 with PsA); 32 treated with certolizumab (CERT; 25 with RA, two with AS, five with PsA); and 19 treated with golimumab (GOL; three with RA, seven with AS, nine with PsA). Serum drug and ADA levels were determined using Lisa-Tracker Duo, the ADA-positive samples underwent an inhibition test, and the true-positive samples underwent genetic HLA typing. To have a homogeneous control population, we also performed genetic HLA typing of 11 ADA-negative patients.

Results

After inhibition test, the frequency of ADAs was 2/26 patients treated with IFX (7.69%), 4/83 treated with ADA (4.81%), 0/88 treated with ETA (0%), 4/32 treated with CERT (12.5%), and 1/19 treated with GOL (5.26%). The frequency of HLA alleles in the examined patients was HLA-DRβ-11 0.636, HLA-DQ-03 0.636, and HLA-DQ-05 0.727. The estimated relative risks between the ADA-positive patients and the ADA-negative patients were HLA-DRβ-11 2.528 (95% CI 0.336-19.036), HLA-DQ-03 1.750 (95% CI 0.289-10.581), and HLA-DQ-05 2.424 (95% CI 0.308-15.449).

Conclusion

This is the first study that shows an association between HLA and genetic factors associated with the occurrence of ADAs in patients with rheumatic diseases, but the number of samples is too small to draw any definite conclusion.

Impact of polymorphisms in genes involved in autoimmune disease on inhibitor development in Chinese patients with haemophilia A

One of the most severe and important complication in the treatment of haemophilia A (HA) patients is the formation of inhibitors. The mechanism that leads to factor (F)VIII inhibitor formation is complicated. Both genetic and environmental factors have been mentioned to play decisive roles. Recently, polymorphisms in the genes encoding interleukin-10 (IL-10), tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4), have been suggested to be contributing determinants of the inhibitor risk. In order to investigate the influence of the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the genes encoding for cytokines to the inhibitors development in Chinese HA patients, we genotyped 10 SNPs with high heterozygote rates in Chinese and a CA repeat microsatellite at the gene loci IL-10 as well in a separate, unrelated case-controlled cohort of 122 affected HA patients; 63 with inhibitors and 59 without inhibitors. The particular SNPs included in this study were as follows: –592C/A and –819C/T in IL-10, –590C/T in IL-4, –318C/T and 49A/G in CTLA-4, –827C/T in TNF-α, –1112C/T and 2044G/A in IL-13, 874A/T in interferon (IFN)-γ and –295T/C in IL-16. Our results demonstrated that –819T and –592A alleles in IL-10 were observed more frequently in patients with inhibitors. This indicated that –819C/T and –592A/C in IL-10 may influence the inhibitors development in HA patients. Furthermore, we concluded that the haplotype in IL-10 (TA, CA, CC at positions –819 and –582, respectively) may predispose FVIII inhibitor development in HA patients. In conclusion, the data reported in our study clearly highlight the participation of IL-10 in inhibitors formation in Chinese HA patients.

Intensity of factor VIII treatment and the development of inhibitors in non-severe hemophilia A patients: results of the INSIGHT case-control study

Essentials Research suggests that intensive treatment episodes may increase the risk to develop inhibitors. We performed an international nested case-control study with 298 non-severe hemophilia A patients. Surgery and a high dose of factor VIII concentrate were associated with increased inhibitor risk. Physicians need to review arguments for factor VIII dose and elective surgery extra critically.

SUMMARY

Background Inhibitor development is a major complication of treatment with factor VIII concentrates in hemophilia. Findings from studies among severe hemophilia A patients suggest that intensive treatment episodes increase the risk of developing inhibitors. Objectives We set out to assess whether intensive treatment is also associated with an increased risk of inhibitor development among non-severe hemophilia A patients. Patients/Methods We performed a nested case-control study. A total of 75 inhibitor patients (cases) and 223 control patients were selected from 2709 non-severe hemophilia A patients (FVIII:C, 2-40%) of the INSIGHT cohort study. Cases and controls were matched for date of birth and cumulative number of exposure days (EDs) to FVIII concentrates. Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate both unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (aOR); the latter were adjusted for a priori specified confounders. Results Peak treatment of 5 or 10 consecutive EDs did not increase inhibitor risk (aOR, 1.0; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.4-2.5; and aOR, 1.8; CI, 0.6-5.5, respectively). Both surgical intervention (aOR, 4.2; CI, 1.7-10.3) and a high mean dose (> 45 IU kg-1 /ED) of FVIII concentrate (aOR, 7.5; CI, 1.6-35.6) were associated with an increased inhibitor risk. Conclusions Our findings suggest that high-dose FVIII treatment and surgery increase the risk of inhibitor development in non-severe hemophilia A. Together with the notion that non-severe hemophilia A patients are at a lifelong risk of inhibitor development, we suggest that in the future physicians will review the arguments for the FVIII dose and elective surgery extra critically.

The Development of FVIII Inhibitors in Relation to IL10 Gene Polymorphism in Hemophilia A Egyptian Pediatric Patients

BACKGROUND

Development of inhibitors against Factor VIII (FVIII) in hemophilia A patients is a serious complication of therapy. Many cytokines, including interleukin-10 (IL10), may affect inhibitor development; however, literature data are not sufficient to prove this association. The aim of this study was to investigate the relation between FVIII inhibitor formation and IL10-1082A/G polymorphism among Egyptian hemophiliacs.

METHODS

Patients were screened for FVIII inhibitors using the Bethesda method. IL10-1082A/G polymorphism was detected by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism.

RESULTS

Six patients (12%) developed inhibitors. No statistically significant difference was found between inhibitor positive and negative patients regarding IL10-1082A/G genotypes, disease severity, or treatment-related variables (type of FVIII received, treatment regimen, age at first exposure to FVIII, and frequency of replacement therapy).

CONCLUSIONS

FVIII inhibitor formation in this group of Egyptian hemophiliacs was not correlated to IL10-1082A/G polymorphism, disease severity, or any of the treatment variables.

Plasma-derived versus recombinant factor concentrates in PUPs: a never ending debate?

Inhibitor development in haemophilia is a serious complication to treatment with factor concentrates. Since the advent of more pure products, especially developed using recombinant DNA technology, some studies have shown an increased incidence of inhibitors in previously untreated patients (PUPs) receiving recombinant products whereas plasma-derived concentrates sometimes have been claimed to have a protective role, probably due to the content of von Willebrand factor (VWF). In fact, experiments indicate that the VWF may block uptake of factor VIII into macrophages for further processing to the immune system. Also, a competition between VWF and inhibitor binding to the C2 domain of factor VIII has been suggested. Recently, large cohort and surveillance studies have created a vigorous debate about the role of product class for inhibitor development as results have been conflicting. The only randomised prospective study, the SIPPET study, was published in 2016, and substantiated previous reports claiming that plasma derived concentrates give less inhibitors in patients with severe haemophilia A, previously not exposed to factor VIII. The debate will continue.

Key insights to understand the immunogenicity of FVIII products

The treatment of haemophilia has made significant progress in recent decades, and patients are now being treated safely with great clotting products. However, inhibitor development remains the largest problem, particularly in children. Consequently, the haemostasis that was obtained with traditional clotting factors is not being achieved. Moreover, inhibitor complications translate into adult life and there are an increasing number of situations where adult patients with an inhibitor require major surgery but the clinician is faced with the knowledge that required haemostasis levels are difficult to achieve. Therefore, it is of upmost importance to consider factors relating to inhibitor development, and to determine how inhibitors can be prevented and/or eliminated. Of the various factors at play with regard to inhibitor development, it is important to consider the immunogenicity of factor VIII (FVIII) products, and this topic is the focus of the current paper.

A close insight to factor VIII inhibitor in the congenital hemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

Hemophilia A (HA) has an X-linked pattern of inheritance and is the most common of the hemorrhagic disorders. HA is caused by a decreased or deficiency of the functional clotting factor VIII (FVIII) and effects 1 in 5000-10,000 male births. The common treatment for hemophilia is replacement therapy by plasma-derived or recombinant FVIII. Approximately 20-30% of people with a severe type of HA develop an inhibitor and this phenomenon is the main challenge in the management of these patients. Genetic factors and environmental determinants contribute to inhibitor development. Here, the roles of various genetic and environmental factors such as the type of FVIII concentrate used, the number of exposure days, and peak treatment time will be discussed in detail. It seems this information is helpful for hematologists.

AREAS COVERED

A literature review was done in January 2016 on PubMed and Scopus using the following keywords:' h(a)emophilia A & factor VIII inhibitor', 'h(a)emophilia A & factor VIII alloantibody', 'h(a)emophilia A & inhibitor'. There was no time limitation; however, there was an English language limitation placed on the articles selected. Expert commentary: Influential genetic and environmental factors in developing inhibitors have been discussed. Most of the risk factors are related to previously untreated patients with hemophili.

Rationale for individualizing haemophilia care

Owing to the heterogeneity in the clinical phenotype of haemophilia A and B, it is now recognized that disease severity (based on factor VIII/IX activity) may no longer be the most appropriate guide for treatment and that a 'one-size-fits-all' approach is unlikely to achieve optimal therapy. Based on the present literature and consensus views of a group of experts in the field, this article highlights key gaps in the understanding of the diverse relationships between bleeding phenotype and factors such as joint health, genetic susceptibility, laboratory parameters, quality of life and management of pain. Early prophylaxis is a potential 'gold standard' therapy and issues surrounding inhibitor development, variations in its clinical use and long-term outcomes are discussed. Comprehensive treatment should be individualized for all patients (including those with mild or moderate haemophilia and carriers). Wherever possible all patients should be given prophylaxis. However, adult patients with a milder haemophilia phenotype may be candidates for ceasing prophylaxis and switching to on-demand treatment. Regardless, all treatment (on-demand and prophylaxis) should be tailored towards both the patient's personal needs and their clinical profile. In addition, as the associations between risk factors (psychosocial, condition-related and treatment-related) and clinical features are unique to each patient, an individualized approach is required to enable patients to alter their behaviour in response to them. The practical methodologies needed to reach this goal of individualized haemophilia care, and the health economic implications of this strategy, are ongoing topics for discussion.

The past and future of haemophilia: diagnosis, treatments, and its complications

Haemophilia A and B are hereditary haemorrhagic disorders characterised by deficiency or dysfunction of coagulation protein factors VIII and IX, respectively. Recurrent joint and muscle bleeds lead to severe and progressive musculoskeletal damage. Existing treatment relies on replacement therapy with clotting factors, either at the time of bleeding (ie, on demand) or as part of a prophylactic schedule. The major complication of such therapy is the development of neutralising antibodies (ie, inhibitors), which is most frequent in haemophilia A. Treatment might improve considerably with the availability of new modified drugs, which might overcome existing prophylaxis limitations by reducing dosing frequency and thereby rendering therapy less distressing for the patient. Subcutaneous administration of some new therapies would also simplify prophylaxis in children with poor venous access. Gene therapy has the potential for a definitive cure, and important results have been obtained in haemophilia B. Despite improvements in haemophilia care, the availability of clotting factor concentrates for all affected individuals worldwide remains the biggest challenge.

Whole-exome sequencing to identify genetic risk variants underlying inhibitor development in severe hemophilia A patients

The development of neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) against coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) is the most problematic and costly complication of FVIII replacement therapy that affects up to 30% of previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A. The development of inhibitors is a multifactorial complication involving environmental and genetic factors. Among the latter, F8 gene mutations, ethnicity, family history of inhibitors, and polymorphisms affecting genes involved in the immune response have been previously investigated. To identify novel genetic elements underling the risk of inhibitor development in patients with severe hemophilia A, we applied whole-exome sequencing (WES) and data analysis in a selected group of 26 Italian patients with (n = 17) and without (n = 9) inhibitors. WES revealed several rare, damaging variants in immunoregulatory genes as novel candidate mutations. A case-control association analysis using Cochran-Armitage and Fisher's exact statistical tests identified 1364 statistically significant variants. Hierarchical clustering of these genetic variants showed 2 distinct patterns of homozygous variants with a protective or harmful role in inhibitor development. When looking solely at coding variants, a total of 28 nonsynonymous variants were identified and replicated in 53 inhibitor-positive and 174 inhibitor-negative Italian severe hemophilia A patients using a TaqMan genotyping assay. The genotyping results revealed 10 variants showing estimated odds ratios in the same direction as in the discovery phase and confirmed the association of the rs3754689 missense variant (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.36-0.94; P = .028) in a highly conserved haplotype region surrounding the LCT locus on chromosome 2q21 with inhibitor development.