A validated composite comorbidity index predicts outcomes of CAR T-cell therapy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

A systematic review and meta-analysis of nonrelapse mortality after CAR T cell therapy

Although chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy represents a transformative immunotherapy, it is also associated with distinct toxicities that contribute to morbidity and mortality. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL (Cochrane) for reports of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) after CAR T cell therapy in lymphoma and multiple myeloma up to March 2024. After extraction of causes and numbers of death, we analyzed NRM point estimates using random-effect models. We identified 7,604 patients across 18 clinical trials and 28 real-world studies. NRM point estimates varied across disease entities and were highest in patients with mantle-cell lymphoma (10.6%), followed by multiple myeloma (8.0%), large B cell lymphoma (6.1%) and indolent lymphoma (5.7%). Entity-specific meta-regression models for large B cell lymphoma and multiple myeloma revealed that axicabtagene ciloleucel and ciltacabtagene autoleucel were independently associated with increased NRM point estimates, respectively. Of 574 reported nonrelapse deaths, over half were attributed to infections (50.9%), followed by other malignancies (7.8%) and cardiovascular/respiratory events (7.3%). Conversely, the CAR T cell-specific side effects, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome/neurotoxicity, cytokine release syndrome and hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, represented only a minority of nonrelapse deaths (cumulatively 11.5%). Our findings underline the critical importance of infectious complications after CAR T cell therapy and support the comprehensive reporting of NRM, including specific causes and long-term outcomes.

Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in older patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma: A multicenter study

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, despite being a potentially curative therapy in relapsed or refractory (RR) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), remains underutilized in older patients due to limited clinical data. We therefore studied the safety and efficacy of CAR-T therapy in older patients with RR LBCL in the real-world setting. Patients aged ≥65 years with RR LBCL, treated with anti-CD19 CAR-T therapy at 7 US institutions were included in this multicenter, retrospective, observational study. In total, 226 patients were included. Median age at infusion was 71 years (range 65-89). Best objective and complete response rates were 86% and 62%, respectively. Median follow-up after infusion was 18.3 months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.9 months, with 6- and 12-month PFS estimates of 54% and 44%, respectively. The nonrelapse mortality (NRM) rate was 10.9% at day 180, primarily due to infections, and not impacted by the age groups. Grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity occurred in 7% and 26%, respectively. In univariate analysis, no significant difference in PFS was seen regardless of the age groups or CAR-T type, whereas ECOG PS ≥2, elevated LDH, bulky disease, advanced stage, extranodal involvement, the need for bridging therapy, and prior bendamustine exposure were associated with shorter PFS. These findings support the use of CAR-T in older patients, including those aged ≥80 years. The age at CAR-T therapy did not influence safety, survival, and NRM outcomes. Older patients should not be excluded from receiving CAR-T therapy solely based on their chronological age.

Several factors that predict the outcome of large B-cell lymphoma patients who relapse/progress after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy can be identified before cell administration

AIM

The aim of this study was to analyse the outcomes of patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) treated with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-Tx), with a focus on outcomes after CAR T-cell failure, and to define the risk factors for rapid progression and further treatment.

METHODS

We analysed 107 patients with LBCL from the Czech Republic and Slovakia who were treated in ≥3rd-line with tisagenlecleucel or axicabtagene ciloleucel between 2019 and 2022.

RESULTS

The overall response rate (ORR) was 60%, with a 50% complete response (CR) rate. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 4.3 and 26.4 months, respectively. Sixty-three patients (59%) were refractory or relapsed after CAR-Tx. Of these patients, 39 received radiotherapy or systemic therapy, with an ORR of 22% (CR 8%). The median follow-up of surviving patients in whom treatment failed was 10.6 months. Several factors predicting further treatment administration and outcomes were present even before CAR-Tx. Risk factors for not receiving further therapy after CAR-Tx failure were high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels before apheresis, extranodal involvement (EN), high ferritin levels before lymphodepletion (LD) and ECOG PS >1 at R/P. The median OS-2 (from R/P after CAR-Tx) was 6.7 months (6-month 57.9%) for treated patients and 0.4 months (6-month 4.2%) for untreated patients (p < 0.001). The median PFS-2 (from R/P after CAR-Tx) was 3.2 months (6-month 28.5%) for treated patients. The risk factors for a shorter PFS-2 (n = 39) included: CRP > limit of the normal range (LNR) before LD, albumin < LNR and ECOG PS > 1 at R/P. All these factors, together with LDH > LNR before LD and EN involvement at R/P, predicted OS-2 for treated patients.

CONCLUSION

Our findings allow better stratification of CAR-Tx candidates and stress the need for a proactive approach (earlier restaging, intervention after partial remission achievement).

Biomarkers of outcome in patients undergoing CD19 CAR-T therapy for large B cell lymphoma

CD19-directed autologous chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy has transformed the management of relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B cell lymphoma (LBCL). Initially approved in the third line and beyond setting, CAR-T is now standard of care (SOC) for second-line treatment in patients with refractory disease or early relapse (progression within 12 months) following primary chemoimmunotherapy. Despite becoming SOC, most patients do not achieve complete response, and long-term cure is only observed in approximately 40% of patients. Accordingly, there is an urgent need to better understand the mechanisms of treatment failure and to identify patients that are unlikely to benefit from SOC CAR-T. The field needs robust biomarkers to predict treatment outcome, as better understanding of prognostic factors and mechanisms of resistance can inform on the design of novel treatment approaches for patients predicted to respond poorly to SOC CAR-T. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of clinical, molecular, imaging, and cellular features that have been shown to influence outcomes of CAR-T therapy in patients with R/R LBCL.

Anti-CD19 CAR-T Cell Therapy in Elderly Patients: Multicentric Real-World Experience from GETH-TC/GELTAMO

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy is approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B cell lymphoma (LBCL). However, elderly patients might not be candidates for this therapy due to its toxicity, and criteria for candidate selection are lacking. Our aim was to analyze efficacy and toxicity results of CAR-T cell therapy in the population of patients 70 years and older as compared to those obtained in younger patients in the real-world setting. A multicentric retrospective study was performed including patients with R/R aggressive LBCL who received commercial CAR-T cell therapy with either tisagenlecleucel or axicabtagene ciloleucel within the Spanish Group of Hematopoietic Transplant and Cell Therapy/Spanish Group of Lymphomas and Autologous Transplant (GETH-TC/GELTAMO) centers between 2019 and 2023. As of August 2023, 442 adult patients with aggressive LBCL underwent apheresis for CAR-T cell therapy as third or subsequent line and follow-up data was collected. Of 412 infused patients, 71 (17%) were 70 years or older. Baseline characteristics, product selection, and characteristics at apheresis (including disease status, Ann Arbor stage, revised international prognosis index (R-IPI), bulky disease, lactate dehydrogenase [LDH] and ECOG [Eastern Cooperative Group performance status]) were comparable between groups. Median time from both approval to infusion and apheresis to infusion did not differ. No differences were found between groups in overall and complete response rates at 1 and 3 months. With a median follow-up of 12.2 months (range 1-44), 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were comparable between groups (35.2% in <70 years vs. 35.9% in ≥70 years (P = .938) and 51.1% and 52.1% (P = .885), respectively). Age ≥70 years did not affect PFS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.98, P = .941) and OS (HR 0.97, P = .890) in the univariate and multivariate analysis. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was observed in 82% of patients <70 years old and 84.5% in ≥ 70 years old (P = .408). Grade ≥3 CRS was more frequent in the older group (5% vs. 15%, P = .002). In the multivariate analysis, age ≥70 years was associated with an increased risk of grade ≥3 CRS (OR 3.7, P = .013). No differences were observed in terms of overall neurotoxicity (35% vs. 42%, P = .281) or grade ≥3 (12% vs. 17%, P = .33). The proportion of patients with infections, admission to the intensive care unit within the first month, and non-relapse mortality were similar between both groups. CAR-T cell therapy in patients older than 70 years showed similar efficacy to that observed in younger patients in the real-world setting. However, age ≥70 years was an independent risk factor for grades 3-4 CRS. The need for additional strategies to reduce toxicity in this population should be addressed in future studies.

Optimization of older adults by a geriatric assessment-guided multidisciplinary clinic before CAR T-cell therapy

ABSTRACT

The optimal means of assessing candidacy of older adults (≥65 years) for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy are unknown. We explored the role of a geriatric assessment (GA)-guided multidisciplinary clinic (GA-MDC) in selecting and optimizing older adults for CAR-T. Sixty-one patients were evaluated in a GA-MDC (median age, 73 years; range, 58-83). A nonbinding recommendation ("proceed" or "decline") regarding suitability for CAR-T was provided for each patient based on GA results. Fifty-three patients ultimately received CAR-T (proceed, n = 47; decline, n = 6). Among patients who received B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed (n = 11) and CD19-directed CAR-T (n = 42), the median overall survival (OS) was 14.2 months and 16.6 months, respectively. GA uncovered high rates of geriatric impairment among patients proceeding to CAR-T therapy, with fewer impairments in those recommended "proceed." Patients recommended "proceed" had shorter median length of stay (17 vs 31 days; P = .05) and lower rates of intensive care unit admission (6% vs 50%; P = .01) than those recommended "decline." In patients receiving CD19- and BCMA-directed CAR-T therapy, a "proceed" recommendation was associated with superior OS compared with "decline" (median, 16.6 vs 11.4 months [P = .02]; and median, 16.4 vs 4.2 months [P = .03], respectively). When controlling for Karnofsky performance status, C-reactive protein, and lactate dehydrogenase at time of lymphodepletion, the GA-MDC treatment recommendation remained prognostic for OS (hazard ratio, 3.26; P = .04). Patients optimized via the GA-MDC without serious vulnerabilities achieved promising outcomes, whereas patients with high vulnerability experienced high toxicity and poor outcomes after CAR-T therapy.

License for a CAR T: Examining patient eligibility

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has transformed the treatment landscape of lymphoma and is now approved by the FDA for multiple indications. Given that the indications for CAR T-cell therapy are expanding, a larger patient population will be eligible to receive this treatment in the coming years. Pivotal clinical trials leading to FDA approval of CAR T-cell products required patients to have adequate organ function and good performance status. In the real world, however, the patient population eligible for CAR T-cell therapy includes patients who are older, frail, have poor performance status, and have multiple comorbidities. Studies have shown that CAR T-cell therapy is relatively safe and tolerable in such frail patients, however, there is no agreed upon consensus or guidelines to assess eligibility for CAR T-cell therapy at this moment. Gaining further insight into such patient populations will be vital in order to safely provide and expand access to CAR T-cell therapy.

Biomarkers for prediction of CAR T therapy outcomes: current and future perspectives

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy holds enormous potential for the treatment of hematologic malignancies. Despite its benefits, it is still used as a second line of therapy, mainly because of its severe side effects and patient unresponsiveness. Numerous researchers worldwide have attempted to identify effective predictive biomarkers for early prediction of treatment outcomes and adverse effects in CAR T cell therapy, albeit so far only with limited success. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of predictive biomarkers. Although existing predictive metrics correlate to some extent with treatment outcomes, they fail to encapsulate the complexity of the immune system dynamics. The aim of this review is to identify six major groups of predictive biomarkers and propose their use in developing improved and efficient prediction models. These groups include changes in mitochondrial dynamics, endothelial activation, central nervous system impairment, immune system markers, extracellular vesicles, and the inhibitory tumor microenvironment. A comprehensive understanding of the multiple factors that influence therapeutic efficacy has the potential to significantly improve the course of CAR T cell therapy and patient care, thereby making this advanced immunotherapy more appealing and the course of therapy more convenient and favorable for patients.

Chimeric antigen receptor-T cell therapy shows similar efficacy and toxicity in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma aged 70 and older compared to younger patients: A multicenter cohort study

CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has become a standard treatment for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (r/r DLBCL). While the benefits of CAR-T cell treatment are clear in the general patient population, there remains a relative scarcity of real-world evidence regarding its efficacy and toxicity in patients (pts) aged ≥70 years with DLBCL. We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis including 172 r/r DLBCL pts with CAR-T cell treatment, axicabtagene ciloleucel or tisagenlecleucel, between 2019 and 2023 at three tertiary centers. Pts were grouped by age at CAR-T infusion (<70 vs. ≥70 years). Subsequently, descriptive and survival analyses, including propensity score matching, were performed to compare outcomes between both age groups. We identified 109 pts aged <70 and 63 pts aged ≥70 years. Overall response rates for both age groups were comparable (77.7% vs. 78.3%; p = 0.63). With a median follow-up of 8.3 months, median progression-free survival was 10.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.5-21.8) and 11.1 months (95% CI: 4.9-NR) (p = 0.93) for both cohorts. Median overall survival reached 21.8 months (95% CI: 11.8-NR) and 34.4 months (95% CI: 10.1-NR) (p = 0.97), respectively. No significant differences in the incidence of cytokine release syndrome (p = 0.53) or grade ≥3 neurotoxicity (p = 0.56) were observed. Relapse and nonrelapse mortality were not significantly different between both groups. Our findings provide additional support that CAR-T cell therapy is feasible and effective in patients with r/r DLBCL aged 70 years or older, demonstrating outcomes comparable to those observed in younger patients. CAR-T cell therapy should be not withheld for elderly patients with r/r DLBCL.

Recent advances in genomics and therapeutics in mantle cell lymphoma

Over the past decades, significant strides have been made in understanding the pathobiology, prognosis, and treatment options for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). The heterogeneity observed in MCL's biology, genomics, and clinical manifestations, including indolent and aggressive forms, is intricately linked to factors such as the mutational status of the variable region of the immunoglobulin heavy chain gene, epigenetic profiling, and Sox11 expression. Several intriguing subtypes of MCL, such as Cyclin D1-negative MCL, in situ mantle cell neoplasm, CCND1/IGH FISH-negative MCL, and the impact of karyotypic complexity on prognosis, have been explored. Notably, recent immunochemotherapy regimens have yielded long-lasting remissions in select patients. The therapeutic landscape for MCL is continuously evolving, with a shift towards nonchemotherapeutic agents like ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, and venetoclax. The introduction of BTK inhibitors has brought about a transformative change in MCL treatment. Nevertheless, the challenge of resistance to BTK inhibitors persists, prompting ongoing efforts to discover strategies for overcoming this resistance. These strategies encompass non-covalent BTK inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents, BCL2 inhibitors, and CAR-T cell therapy, either as standalone treatments or in combination regimens. Furthermore, developing novel drugs holds promise for further improving the survival of patients with relapsed or refractory MCL. In this comprehensive review, we methodically encapsulate MCL's clinical and pathological attributes and the factors influencing prognosis. We also undertake an in-depth examination of stratified treatment alternatives. We investigate conceivable resistance mechanisms in MCL from a genetic standpoint and offer precise insights into various therapeutic approaches for relapsed or refractory MCL.

Integrative analyses reveal outcome-associated and targetable molecular partnerships between TP53, BRD4, TNFRSF10B, and CDKN1A in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a common, genomically heterogenous disease that presents a clinical challenge despite the success of frontline regimens and second-line chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy. Recently, genomic alterations and tumor microenvironment features associated with poor CAR-T response have been identified, namely those to the TP53 tumor suppressor gene. This retrospective analysis aimed to integrate various data to identify genomic partnerships capable of providing further clarity and actionable treatment targets within this population. Publicly available data were analyzed for differential expression based on TP53 and 24-month event-free survival (EFS24) status, revealing enrichments of the BRD4 bromodomain oncogene (p < 0.0001, p = 0.001). High-BRD4 and TP53 alterations were significantly associated with lower CDKN1A (p21) and TNFRSF10B (TRAIL-R2), a key tumor suppressor and CAR-T modulator, respectively. Significant loss of CD8 T-cell presence within low-TNFRSF0B (p = 0.0042) and altered-TP53 (p = 0.0424) patients showcased relevant outcome-associated tumor microenvironment features. Furthermore, reduced expression of CDKN1A was associated with low TNFRSF10B (FDR < 0.0001) and increased BRD4 interactant genes (FDR < 0.0001). Promisingly, in vitro MDM2 inhibition with Idasnutlin and TP53 reactivation via Eprenetapopt was able to renew TNFRSF10B protein expression. Additionally, applying the BRD4-degrading PROTAC ARV-825 and the CDK4/6 inhibitor Abemaciclib as single-agents and in synergistic combination significantly reduced TP53-altered DLBCL cell line viability. Our analysis presents key associations within a genomic network of actionable targets capable of providing clarity within the evolving precision CAR-T treatment landscape.

Selection of bispecific antibody therapies or CAR-T cell therapy in relapsed lymphomas

Patients with relapsed and refractory (R/R) aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas have historically poor survival outcomes, with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy now presenting a curative option for a subset of those patients. However, with the approval of several novel bispecific monoclonal antibody (BsAb) therapies with considerable activity in R/R aggressive large B-cell lymphomas (LBCL), patients and oncologists will be faced with decisions regarding how to sequence CAR-T and BsAb therapies based on patient- and disease-related factors. In this review, we compare CAR-T and BsAb therapies for R/R LBCL, highlighting data on the efficacy and toxicity of each treatment paradigm, and provide a roadmap for sequencing these highly effective therapies.

Cyclin-dependent kinase-9 in B-cell malignancies: pathogenic role and therapeutic implications

Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) regulate cell cycle and transcriptional activity. Pan-CDK inhibitors demonstrated early efficacy in lymphoid malignancies, but also have been associated with narrow therapeutic index. Among transcriptional CDKs, CDK7 and CDK9 emerged as promising targets. CDK9 serves as a component of P-TEFb elongation complex and thus is indispensable in mRNA transcription. Selective CDK9 inhibitors demonstrated pre-clinical efficacy in in vitro and in vivo models of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. CDK9 inhibition results in transcriptional pausing with rapid downmodulation of short-lived oncogenic proteins, e.g. Myc and Mcl-1, followed by cell apoptosis. Early phase clinical trials established safety of CDK9 inhibitors, with manageable neutropenia, infections and gastrointestinal toxicities. In this review, we summarize the rationale of targeting CDK9 in lymphoid malignancies, as well as pre-clinical and early clinical data with pan-CDK and selective CDK9 inhibitors.

Effective sequencing of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in the treatment of LBCL in 2023

Over the last decade, CD19-targeting chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has profoundly changed the management of relapsed/refractory large-B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). At present, there are three FDA-approved anti-CD19 CAR T-cell products for LBCL: axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel), and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel). Two of these (axi-cel & liso-cel) are approved for use in the second-line setting under certain conditions. As CAR T-cell therapy continues to define a new role in the treatment armamentarium for LBCL, questions remain regarding which product to use and how to sequence CAR T-cell therapy with other therapeutic options. Here we will briefly review the key features of each FDA-approved anti-CD19 CAR T-cell product and the data that led to regulatory approval for each. Next, we will focus on the recent landmark studies that have established the use of CAR T-cell therapy as second-line treatment. While no direct prospective head-to-head comparisons exist of the 3 constructs, we will review some retrospective studies that suggest some emerging differences between the products. Lastly, we will turn our attention to the horizon as we explore some of the ongoing questions of how to best leverage the curative potential of CAR T-cell therapy for the most effective management of LBCL. These areas include the consideration of CAR T-cell therapy in the frontline setting, the optimal timing for CAR T-cell referral, the optimal bridging approach, and how to continue advancing novel CAR T-cell approaches in the context of the current treatment landscape.

CAR-T Cell Therapy in Large B Cell Lymphoma

Large B-cell lymphomas (LBCLs) are among the most frequent (about 30%) non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Despite the aggressive behavior of these lymphomas, more than 60% of patients can be cured with first-line chemoimmunotherapy using the R-CHOP regimen. Patients with refractory or relapsing disease show a poor outcome even when treated with second-line therapies. CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells are emerging as an efficacious second-line treatment strategy for patients with LBCL. Three CD19-CAR-T-cell products received FDA and EMA approval. CAR-T cell therapy has also been explored for treating high-risk LBCL patients in the first-line setting and for patients with central nervous system involvement. Although CD19-CAR-T therapy has transformed the care of refractory/relapsed LBCL, about 60% of these patients will ultimately progress or relapse following CD19-CAR-T; therefore, it is fundamental to identify predictive criteria of response to CAR-T therapy and to develop salvage therapies for patients relapsing after CD19-CAR-T therapies. Moreover, ongoing clinical trials evaluate bispecific CAR-T cells targeting both CD19 and CD20 or CD19 and CD22 as a tool to improve the therapeutic efficacy and reduce the number of refractory/relapsing patients.

Thinking "outside the germinal center": Re-educating T cells to combat follicular lymphoma

There have been significant advancements in the management of follicular lymphoma (FL), the most common indolent lymphoma. These include immunomodulatory agents such as lenalidomide, epigenetic modifiers (tazemetostat), and phosphoinotiside-3 kinase inhibitors (copanlisib). The focus of this review is T cell-engager therapies, namely chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies, have recently transformed the treatment landscape of FL. Two CAR T cell products, axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), and one bispecific antibody, mosunetuzumab, recently received FDA approvals in FL. Several other new immune effector drugs are being evaluated and will expand the treatment armamentarium. This review focuses on CAR T-cell and bispecific antibody therapies, details their safety and efficacy and considers their evolving role in the current treatment landscape of FL.

The progress of novel strategies on immune-based therapy in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) can be cured with standard front-line immunochemotherapy, whereas nearly 30-40% of patients experience refractory or relapse. For several decades, the standard treatment strategy for fit relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL patients has been high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto-SCT). However, the patients who failed in salvage treatment or those ineligible for subsequent auto-SCT have dismal outcomes. Several immune-based therapies have been developed, including monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific T-cell engaging antibodies, chimeric antigen receptor T-cells, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and novel small molecules. Meanwhile, allogeneic SCT and radiotherapy are still necessary for disease control for fit patients with certain conditions. In this review, to expand clinical treatment options, we summarize the recent progress of immune-related therapies and prospect the future indirections in patients with R/R DLBCL.

Age is No Barrier: CAR-T Therapy in Older Adults

In the last decade, chimeric antigen receptor-T (CAR-T) cells have revolutionized the treatment of hematological malignancies. With six different products for five diseases in various settings, CAR-T use has increased, and the comfort level of prescribers continues to expand. These therapies carry substantial toxicities that may limit their applicability to all patient populations. In the registrational trials, older adults are represented as part of a whole and risks specific to older age may not be clearly outlined. The aim of this review is to summarize the data from clinical trials, as well as real-life evidence, that outline the safety of CAR-T in older adults. With most of the data coming from CD19 CAR-T for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, it appears that CAR-T can be safely administered to older individuals.

Integrating CAR-T cell therapy into the management of DLBCL: what we are learning

INTRODUCTION

Chimeric Antigen Receptor ;(CAR) T cells therapies have become part of the standard of care for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The weakness of CAR-T therapies is that there are no comparative clinical trials, although many publications based on real-life data have confirmed the results obtained in pivotal studies. After several years of the commercialization of CAR-T, some points still need to be fully clarified. Healthcare professionals have questions about identifying patients who may benefit from therapy. There are aspects inherent in the accessibility of care related to improved relationships between CAR-T-delivering and referral centers.

AREAS COVERED

Open questions are inherent in the salvage and bridge therapy, predictive criteria for response and persistence of CAR-T after infusion. Managing toxicities remain a top priority and one of the points on which further knowledge is needed.

EXPERT OPINION

This review aims to describe the current landscape of CAR-T cells in DLBCL, outline their outcomes and toxicities, and explain the outstanding questions that remain to be addressed.