Effect of food on early drug exposure from extended-release stimulants: results from the Concerta, Adderall XR Food Evaluation (CAFE) Study

Pharmacokinetics of Long-Acting Methylphenidate: Formulation Differences, Bioequivalence, Interchangeability

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder is one of the most common neuropsychiatric conditions in children, and methylphenidate (MPH) is one of the first-line therapies. MPH is available in a variety of extended-release (ER) formulations worldwide, and most formulations are not considered bioequivalent due to differences in pharmacokinetics. It is hypothesized that the current bioequivalence guidelines from the different regulatory bodies may generate inconsistent findings or recommendations when assessing the bioequivalence of ER MPH formulations. This manuscript aims to conduct a comprehensive and narrative critical literature review to analyze pharmacokinetic data pertaining to ER formulations of MPH in order to assess bioequivalence, differences in regulatory guidelines, and additional pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic parameters that may help define interchangeability.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane Library with no time limits. Study characteristics, non-compartmental pharmacokinetic parameters, and bioequivalence data were extracted for analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-three studies were identified with primary pharmacokinetic data after the administration of ER MPH, of which 10 were direct comparative studies (i.e., at least 2 formulations tested within a single setting) and 23 were indirect comparisons (i.e., different experimental settings). Two formulations were consistently reported as bioequivalent across the regulatory bodies using criteria from their guidance documents, although inconsistencies have been observed. However, when additional kinetic criteria (discussed in this manuscript) were imposed, only one study met the more stringent definition of bioequivalence. Various clinical factors also had inconsistent effects on the pharmacokinetics and interchangeability of the different formulations, which were associated with a lack of standardization for assessing covariates across the regulatory agencies.

CONCLUSION

Additional pharmacokinetic parameters and consistency in guidelines across the regulatory bodies may improve bioequivalence assessments. Based on our findings, more research is also required to understand whether bioequivalence is an appropriate measure for determining MPH interchangeability. This critical review is suitable for formulation scientists, clinical pharmacologists, and clinicians.

Pharmacokinetics of AR19, an Immediate-Release Amphetamine Sulfate Formulation Designed to Deter Manipulation for Administration Via Nonoral Routes: Bioequivalence to Reference Racemic Amphetamine Sulfate, Dose Proportionality, and Food Effect

Objectives: We evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK) of an investigational immediate-release amphetamine (AMP) sulfate formulation (AR19) designed to deter nonoral administration versus reference racemic amphetamine sulfate (RA-AMPH). We investigated AMP bioavailability from AR19, the effect of taking AR19 with food or sprinkling the capsules on food, and dose proportionality. Methods: Participants received AR19 (20 mg) or reference RA-AMPH (20 mg) (bioequivalence study) or AR19 5 or 30 mg (dose comparison study). Food effect study participants received AR19 (20 mg) as intact capsule while fasted or after high-fat/-calorie meal, or as pellets sprinkled on applesauce or yogurt (≥6-day washout). Blood samples were analyzed for dextroamphetamine (d-AMP) and levoamphetamine (l-AMP) PK: C_max, AUC_last, AUC_inf, λ_z, T_½, and T_max. Safety was assessed. Results: Bioequivalence, dose comparison, and food effect studies included 36, 24, and 36 participants. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of C_max, AUC_last, and AUC_inf for AR19 20 mg versus reference RA-AMPH or AR19 with intact capsule and meal or sprinkled AR19 pellets on food versus fasted were between 80% and 125%. Dose-normalized C_max/D, AUC_last/D, and AUC_inf/D for AR19 5 versus 30 mg had CIs within 80%-125%. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) T_max was comparable for AMP (d-AMP; l-AMP) following AR19 20 mg (2.84 ± 1.05; 3.05 ± 1.22) versus reference RA-AMPH (2.52 ± 0.75; 2.75 ± 1.00), and AR19 5 mg (2.48 ± 0.57; 2.65 ± 0.65) versus AR19 30 mg (2.55 ± 0.56; 2.72 ± 0.65). Mean ± SD T_max for AMP (d-AMP; l-AMP) was higher with intact capsule and meal (5.59 ± 1.57; 5.59 ± 1.59) versus fasted (2.85 ± 0.76; 2.97 ± 0.79). No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusion: AR19 was bioequivalent to reference RA-AMPH. Bioavailability was similar at doses between 5 and 30 mg and was not impacted by meal consumption or sprinkling on food. AR19 at tested doses was well tolerated.

Pharmacokinetics of HLD200, a Delayed-Release and Extended-Release Methylphenidate: Evaluation of Dose Proportionality, Food Effect, Multiple-Dose Modeling, and Comparative Bioavailability with Immediate-Release Methylphenidate in Healthy Adults

OBJECTIVES

HLD200, an oral, once-daily, evening-dosed, delayed-release, and extended-release methylphenidate (DR/ER-MPH), was designed to provide efficacy from the early morning, throughout the day, and into the evening to individuals with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. The objectives were to evaluate DR/ER-MPH pharmacokinetic (PK) properties in healthy adults, including dose proportionality, food effect, the potential of accumulation using multiple-dose modeling, and bioavailability compared to an immediate-release MPH (IR MPH).

METHODS

Three open-label, single-dose, crossover studies were conducted, all with a 7-day washout between treatments. In Study I, 20 subjects received evening-dosed DR/ER-MPH (20 and 100 mg) followed by a medium-fat breakfast; 13 subjects received a subsequent 100-mg dose of DR/ER-MPH followed by a low-fat breakfast. In Study II, 18 subjects were evaluated after receiving evening-dosed DR/ER-MPH (100 mg) under 3 conditions: immediately after a high-fat meal, sprinkled on applesauce, and in a fasted state. In Study III, 11 and 12 subjects received evening-dosed DR/ER-MPH (100 mg) and morning-dosed IR MPH (20 mg), respectively.

RESULTS

DR/ER-MPH demonstrated dose proportionality between 20- and 100-mg doses. DR/ER-MPH PK parameters were not significantly affected by breakfast content or by sprinkling capsule contents. A high-fat meal immediately preceding evening dosing did not affect total MPH exposure but lowered peak MPH exposure by 14% and 11% versus fasted and sprinkled states, and time to peak exposure was delayed by ∼2.5 hours; these PK differences are unlikely to be clinically significant. Based on multiple-dose simulations using data from Study I, negligible accumulation of DR/ER-MPH was predicted. The relative bioavailability for DR/ER-MPH compared to IR MPH was 73.9%. No serious adverse events (AEs) were reported, and the observed AEs were consistent with MPH. There were no discontinuations in Studies I and III, but three participants withdrew in Study II due to AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

Evening-dosed DR/ER-MPH demonstrated dose proportionality and can be administered with or without food. Significant accumulation is unlikely with multiple dosing.

Physiological Considerations and In Vitro Strategies for Evaluating the Influence of Food on Drug Release from Extended-Release Formulations

Food effects on oral drug bioavailability are a consequence of the complex interplay between drug, formulation and human gastrointestinal (GI) physiology. Accordingly, the prediction of the direction and the extent of food effects is often difficult. With respect to novel formulations, biorelevant in vitro methods can be extremely powerful tools to simulate the effect of food-induced changes on the physiological GI conditions on drug release and absorption. However, the selection of suitable in vitro methods should be based on a thorough understanding not only of human GI physiology but also of the drug and formulation properties. This review focuses on in vitro methods that can be applied to evaluate the effect of food intake on drug release from extended release (ER) products during preclinical formulation development. With the aid of different examples, it will be demonstrated that the combined and targeted use of various biorelevant in vitro methods can be extremely useful for understanding drug release from ER products in the fed state and to be able to forecast formulation-associated risks such as dose dumping in early stages of formulation development.

Recent advances in "smart" delivery systems for extended drug release in cancer therapy

Advances in nanomedicine have become indispensable for targeted drug delivery, early detection, and increasingly personalized approaches to cancer treatment. Nanoparticle-based drug-delivery systems have overcome some of the limitations associated with traditional cancer-therapy administration, such as reduced drug solubility, chemoresistance, systemic toxicity, narrow therapeutic indices, and poor oral bioavailability. Advances in the field of nanomedicine include “smart” drug delivery, or multiple levels of targeting, and extended-release drug-delivery systems that provide additional methods of overcoming these limitations. More recently, the idea of combining smart drug delivery with extended-release has emerged in hopes of developing highly efficient nanoparticles with improved delivery, bioavailability, and safety profiles. Although functionalized and extended-release drug-delivery systems have been studied extensively, there remain gaps in the literature concerning their application in cancer treatment. We aim to provide an overview of smart and extended-release drug-delivery systems for the delivery of cancer therapies, as well as to introduce innovative advancements in nanoparticle design incorporating these principles. With the growing need for increasingly personalized medicine in cancer treatment, smart extended-release nanoparticles have the potential to enhance chemotherapy delivery, patient adherence, and treatment outcomes in cancer patients.

Effect of Food Intake on the Pharmacokinetics of a Novel Methylphenidate Extended-Release Oral Suspension for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

We conducted an open-label, single-dose, randomized, crossover study in healthy adults to assess the impact of food on the bioavailability of 60 mg methylphenidate extended-release oral suspension (MEROS; Quillivant XR™)-a long-acting stimulant for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder-by comparing the pharmacokinetic parameters under fed and fasting conditions. When MEROS 60 mg was administered under fed conditions compared with fasting conditions, the exposure of methylphenidate (d enantiomer) was higher, with a mean area under the plasma concentration-vs-time curve (AUC)_0-t of 160.2 ng·h/mL vs 140.4 ng·h/mL, and a mean AUC_0-inf of 163.2 ng·h/mL vs 143.7 ng·h/mL, respectively. The ratios of the ln-transformed geometric means for methylphenidate for AUC_0-t and AUC_0-inf were 119.5% (90%CI, 115.7% to 123.5%) and 119.0% (90%CI, 115.2% to 122.8%), respectively, within the standard 80% to 125% bioequivalence acceptance range indicating no food effect on the overall exposure (rate and extent). There was a small increase in the peak plasma concentration (127.6% [90%CI, 119.9% to 135.8%]). However, this effect was small and not likely to be clinically significant. Overall, MEROS 60 mg was safe in both the fed and fasting condition when administered to healthy volunteers in this study.

Fed and Fasted Administration of a Novel Extended-Release Methylphenidate Orally Disintegrating Tablet Formulation for the Treatment of ADHD

Extended-release methylphenidate is a first-line treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. A methylphenidate extended-release orally disintegrating tablet (MPH XR-ODT) has recently been developed. Here we report an open-label, randomized, 2-period, 2-treatment crossover study to determine the effect of food on the bioavailability of a single 60-mg dose of MPH XR-ODT in healthy adults. Blood samples were collected predose through 36 hours postdose. Maximum plasma concentration (C_max ), time to maximum plasma concentration (T_max ), terminal elimination half-life (T_1/2 ), overall systemic exposure (AUC_last and AUC_inf ), and partial areas under the concentration curve (AUC_0-3 , AUC_3-7 , and AUC_7-12 ) were calculated. In total, 48 participants completed the study. For total methylphenidate from MPH XR-ODT, the lower limit of the 90% confidence interval (CI) around the geometric mean ratio (GMR, fed/fasted) for C_max was below 80%, indicating a slightly decreased rate of absorption with food, whereas the 90%CIs around the GMRs of AUC_last and AUC_inf were within the 80%-125% limits, suggesting no food effect on exposure. The most common adverse events (AEs) were palpitations and decreased appetite. No serious, unusual, or unexpected AEs were reported. Thus, food had no substantial effect on overall bioavailability of MPH XR-ODT, which may be an important factor for some patients.

Exposure-response analyses of blood pressure and heart rate changes for methylphenidate in healthy adults

The aim of the study was to evaluate the exposure-response (E-R) relationships of blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) changes in healthy adults taking methylphenidate (MPH). Intensive time profiles of BP and HR from healthy adults in placebo and MPH treatment arms of seven clinical trials from the FDA internal database were utilized for this analysis. The analysis model contains a circadian component for placebo effect and an E-R component to describe drug effect. Internal validation was performed using goodness-of-fit plots and visual predictive check. A meta-database based on a systemic literature search was constructed and used for external validation of the developed models. We found that circadian models could quantify the time profiles of BP/HR in placebo arms. Linear models could describe the correlations between MPH concentrations, and BP/HR changes. The BP and HR changes were highly dependent on the shapes of MPH pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles without an apparent time delay. MPH has the greatest effect on HR, followed by systolic BP, and diastolic BP. Internal validation revealed that the developed models could adequately describe the circadian rhythms of HR and BP in placebo arms and the E-R relationships of MPH. External validation showed the models had good predictive capability of the literature data. In conclusion, the developed models adequately characterized the circadian rhythm and the MPH induced effects on BP and HR. The changes in BP and HR were highly correlated with MPH blood levels with no apparent delay. The time courses of BP and HR are similar to the MPH PK profiles. As a result, the immediate-release formulation may yield larger maximum BP and HR effect than the extended-release formulation under similar dose.

Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate: Prodrug Delivery, Amphetamine Exposure and Duration of Efficacy

Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) is a long-acting d-amphetamine prodrug used to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children, adolescents and adults. LDX is hydrolysed in the blood to yield d-amphetamine, and the pharmacokinetic profile of d-amphetamine following oral administration of LDX has a lower maximum plasma concentration (C_max), extended time to C_max (T_max) and lower inter- and intra-individual variability in exposure compared with the pharmacokinetic profile of an equivalent dose of immediate-release (IR) d-amphetamine. The therapeutic action of LDX extends to at least 13 h post-dose in children and 14 h post-dose in adults, longer than that reported for any other long-acting formulation. Drug-liking scores for LDX are lower than for an equivalent dose of IR d-amphetamine, which may result from the reduced euphorigenic potential associated with its pharmacokinetic profile. These pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of LDX may be beneficial in the management of symptoms in children, adolescents and adults with ADHD.

Effectiveness and safety of a long-acting, once-daily, two-phase release formulation of methylphenidate (Ritalin ® LA) in school children under daily practice conditions

Long-acting (LA) preparations of methylphenidate allow for once-daily dosing; however, pharmacokinetics may vary and depend on food intake. The objective was to evaluate effectiveness of a two-phase release formulation (Ritalin(®) LA) under daily practice conditions. This was a prospective, multicenter, observational study in Germany. Eligibility and dosing were determined by the physician based on the drug label. Outcomes included changes over 3 months of treatment in assessments of effect duration, clinical global impression (CGI), and quality of life (ILK). In 101 sites, 262 patients (197 boys, 63 girls, and two unknown) with a mean age of 10.9 years were enrolled; 50 were treated for the first time; 212 switched medication to Ritalin(®) LA. After 3 months, CGI improved in 59.4 % of patients, and well-being overall was rated as good by 61.0 % of parents and 63.7 % of children. Based on parents' assessment, the proportion of children suffering from strong disease burden decreased from 40.7 to 15.1 %. In 123 insufficient responders to previous ADHD medications, benefit from Ritalin(®) LA was above average and effect duration was significantly prolonged as compared to pretreatment. Overall, 28 patients (10.7 %) had treatment-related adverse events with one case being serious; 23 patients (8.8 %) discontinued therapy, 7 (2.7 %) due to poor treatment response; and 212 patients (81 %) continued treatment beyond the study. In line with clinical trial data, Ritalin(®) LA provides significant benefit also under routine practice conditions.

The effect of food on the oral bioavailability of drugs: a review of current developments and pharmaceutical technologies for pharmacokinetic control

Here we review the mediation of the food effects on drugs by pharmaceutical technologies. The pharmacokinetics of drugs are affected by the interaction of drugs with food, which changes drug physicochemical and physiological properties (food effects). Several pharmaceutical technologies may be used to control food effects. Drugs exhibit different patterns of solubilization depending on release formulations. Formulations such as nanoparticle, solid dispersion and cyclodextrin systems, may control the solubility and release of insoluble drugs. Other controlled-release technologies, such as osmotic-controlled release or colon-specific delivery systems may also control food effects. As the structure of drug candidates becomes more complex, different methods of investigation, such as in vitro and in vivo correlation and in silico simulation will be required to predict drug characteristics and food effects.

A review of psychostimulant-induced neuroadaptation in developing animals

The effects of clinically relevant doses of commonly prescribed stimulants methylphenidate (MPH), d-amphetamine (d-AMPH), and dl-AMPH or mixed amphetamine salts (MAS) such as Adderall, on short- and long-term gene neuroadaptations in developing animals have not been widely investigated. In the present review, the effects of oral stimulant administration were compared with those of the subcutaneous or intra-peritoneal route. A selective set of studies between 1979 and 2010, which incorporated in their design developmental period, clinically relevant doses of stimulants, and repeated daily doses were reviewed. These studies indicate that neuroadaptation to chronic stimulants includes blunting of stimulated immediate early gene expression, sensitivity of younger (prepubertal) brain to smaller dosages of stimulants, and the persistence of some effects, especially behavioral neuroadaptations, into adulthood. In addition, oral amphetamines (MAS) have more profound effects than does oral MPH. Further animal developmental studies are required to understand potential long-term neuroadaptations to low, daily oral doses of stimulants. Implications for clinical practice were also discussed.

Pharmacokinetics and therapeutic effect of OROS methylphenidate under different breakfast conditions in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

OBJECTIVE

To examine the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and pharmacodynamics (PDs) of OROS methylphenidate (OROS MPH) dosed once daily (QD) versus an early standard regimen (immediate-release [IR] MPH dosed three times daily [TID]) under various breakfast conditions.

METHODS

This single-center, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, crossover study of OROS MPH (NCT00269815) in children aged 6 to 12 years with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder evaluated the PKs and PDs of MPH given with different breakfast conditions: OROS MPH administered after a high-fat breakfast, after a normal breakfast, or after fasting and IR MPH administered after a normal breakfast or after fasting in the morning and at two subsequent time points during the day. To maximize information, patients were divided into two groups, each receiving three of the five treatments for 1 day in a three-period, randomized, crossover design. Patients were assigned to 1 of 3 dosage levels (OROS MPH 18, 36, and 54 mg QD, and an assumed equivalent regimen of IR MPH 5, 10, and 15 mg given TID) based on their prestudy established clinical dose of IR MPH. PD measurements included Combined-Attention and Deportment scores on a rating scale of school behavior (the Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham), global assessments of efficacy, and activity monitor levels during academic seatwork. Serial blood samples for PK analysis were taken predose, and then every 60 to 90 minutes until 11.5 hours postdose. Vital signs were assessed predose, and then every 1.5 to 2.5 hours until 11.5 hours postdose.

RESULTS

Of the 32 patients enrolled, 31 completed the study. The PK profiles for MPH after OROS MPH administration were similar under all conditions (with normal, high-fat breakfast, or fasting). No bioequivalence tests of OROS MPH and IR MPH under various breakfast conditions were done because there were so few patients in each dose level of treatment. The two IR MPH conditions (after normal breakfast and fasting) were not compared. The drug-to-metabolite ratios (area under the curve) for all OROS MPH and IR MPH treatments were similar. OROS MPH and IR MPH provided a similar therapeutic effect, irrespective of breakfast conditions, as demonstrated by the Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Attention and Deportment measures and global assessments. No serious adverse events, no deaths, and no clinically significant changes in vital signs were reported, except for one patient who was discontinued early because of repeated systolic blood pressure elevations on study day 1.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrate that in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, administering OROS MPH with or without food produces similar PK and PD profiles.

Pharmacokinetic variability of long-acting stimulants in the treatment of children and adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder

Methylphenidate- and amfetamine-based stimulants are first-line pharmacotherapies for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, a common neurobehavioural disorder in children and adults. A number of long-acting stimulant formulations have been developed with the aim of providing once-daily dosing, employing various means to extend duration of action, including a transdermal delivery system, an osmotic-release oral system, capsules with a mixture of immediate- and delayed-release beads, and prodrug technology. Coefficients of variance of pharmacokinetic measures can estimate the levels of pharmacokinetic variability based on the measurable variance between different individuals receiving the same dose of stimulant (interindividual variability) and within the same individual over multiple administrations (intraindividual variability). Differences in formulation clearly impact pharmacokinetic profiles. Many medications exhibit wide interindividual variability in clinical response. Stimulants with low levels of inter- and intraindividual variability may be better suited to provide consistent levels of medication to patients. The pharmacokinetic profile of stimulants using pH-dependent bead technology can vary depending on food consumption or concomitant administration of medications that alter gastric pH. While delivery of methylphenidate with the transdermal delivery system would be unaffected by gastrointestinal factors, intersubject variability is nonetheless substantial. Unlike the beaded formulations and, to some extent (when considering total exposure) the osmotic-release formulation, systemic exposure to amfetamine with the prodrug stimulant lisdexamfetamine dimesylate appears largely unaffected by such factors, likely owing to its dependence on systemic enzymatic cleavage of the precursor molecule, which occurs primarily in the blood involving red blood cells. The high capacity but as yet unidentified enzymatic system for conversion of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate may contribute to its consistent pharmacokinetic profile. The reasons underlying observed differential responses to stimulants are likely to be multifactorial, including pharmacodynamic factors. While the use of stimulants with low inter- and intrapatient pharmacokinetic variability does not obviate the need to titrate stimulant doses, stimulants with low intraindividual variation in pharmacokinetic parameters may reduce the likelihood of patients falling into subtherapeutic drug concentrations or reaching drug concentrations at which the risk of adverse events increases. As such, clinicians are urged both to adjust stimulant doses based on therapeutic response and the risk for adverse events and to monitor patients for potential causes of pharmacokinetic variability.

Chronic low dose Adderall XR down-regulates cfos expression in infantile and prepubertal rat striatum and cortex

We previously reported that treatment of prepubertal male rats with low, injected or oral, doses of methylphenidate stimulated cfos, fosB and arc expression in many areas of the developing brain. In the present study our objective was to determine whether the widely prescribed psychostimulant Adderall XR (ADD) exerted similar effects in infantile and prepubertal rat brain. We report here, for the first time, that low threshold doses of oral ADD, an extended-release mixture of amphetamine salts, now routinely used for the treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), also increased cfos expression in infantile (postnatal day 10; PD10) and prepubertal (PD24) rat brain. These threshold doses were correlated with blood levels of amphetamine determined by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Moreover, we observed that chronic treatment with oral ADD (1.6 mg/kg; x 14 days) not only significantly down-regulated cfos expression following a final challenge dose of ADD in prepubertal (PD24) rat striatum and cortex, quantified in terms of FOS immunoreactivity (FOS-ir), but did so at a daily dose that was without effect with methylphenidate (MPH); that is a much higher oral dose of MPH (7.5 mg/kg; x 14 days) failed to induce down-regulation of cfos expression. Similar experiments in infantile rats (PD10), but using a threshold injected dose of ADD (1.25 mg/kg sc) also significantly reduced striatal and cingulate cortical FOS-ir. An additional finding in the prepubertal rats was that oral ADD-induced FOS-ir was observed in the cerebral cortex following doses lower than the threshold dose necessary to increase FOS-ir in the striatum. This was not the case in the PD10 rats. In conclusion, our efforts to calibrate biological responses, such as immediate early gene expression, to clinically relevant blood levels of stimulants confirmed that expression of cfos is very sensitive to repeated low doses of Adderall XR. It is now feasible to examine whether other genes are also affected in these young rats and if the changes we report are reversible. The implications of such studies should be relevant to the putative effects of psychostimulant treatment of very young children.

Oral osmotically driven systems: 30 years of development and clinical use

The number of marketed oral osmotically driven systems (OODS) has doubled in the last 10 years. The main clinical benefits of OODS are their ability to improve treatment tolerability and patient compliance. These advantages are mainly driven by the capacity to deliver drugs in a sustained manner, independent of the drug chemical properties, of the patient's physiological factors or concomitant food intake. However, access to these technologies has been restricted by the crowded patent landscape and manufacturing challenges. In this review article, we intend to give an overview of the OODS development in the last 30 years, detailing the technologies, specific products and their clinical use. General guidance on technology selection is described in light of the recent advances in the field. The clinical performance of these technologies is also discussed, with a focus on food effects and the in vivo-in vitro correlation. Special attention is paid to safety given the controversial case study of Osmosin. Overall, oral osmotically driven systems appear to be a promising technology for product life-cycle strategies.

Current methods for predicting human food effect

Food can impact the pharmacokinetics of a drug product through several mechanisms, including but not limited to, enhancement in drug solubility, changes in GI physiology, or direct interaction with the drug. Significant food effects complicate development of new drugs, especially when clinical plans require control and/or monitoring of food intake in relation to dosing. The prediction of whether a drug or drug product will show a human food effect is challenging. In vitro models which consider physical-chemical properties can classify the potential for a compound to demonstrate a positive, negative or no food effect, and may be appropriate for screening compounds at early stages of drug discovery. When comparing various formulations, dissolution tests in biorelevant media can serve as a predictor of human drug performance under fasted and fed conditions. Few in vivo models exist which predict the magnitude of change in pharmacokinetic parameters in humans when dosing in the presence of food, with the dog appearing to be the most studied species for this purpose. Control of gastric pH, as well as the amount and composition of the fed state in dogs are critical parameters to improving the predictability of the dog overall as a food effect model. No single universal model is applicable for all drugs at all stages of drug development. One or more models may be required depending whether the goal is to assess potential for a food effect, determine the magnitude of change in pharmacokinetic parameters in the fed/fasted state, or whether formulation efforts have the ability to mitigate an observed food effect.

Multiple daily-dose pharmacokinetics of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in healthy adult volunteers

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX; Vyvanse) in fasting healthy adult volunteers.

BACKGROUND

LDX is the first pro-drug stimulant and is indicated for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. LDX was developed with the goal of providing an extended effect that is consistent throughout the day, with a reduced potential for abuse, overdose toxicity, and drug tampering.

METHODS

This was an open-label, multipledose phase 1 study. LDX 70 mg/d was administered in the morning to 12 subjects for 7 days. Twenty blood samples were drawn during the study. Descriptive statistics were used for pharmacokinetic parameters.

RESULTS

Based on C(min), steady-state d-amphetamine concentration (20.6 ng/mL) was reached by day 5, whereas LDX was undetectable, and 95% of the d-amphetamine was eliminated within 48 hours following the final dose on day 7. At steady state, d-amphetamine achieved a mean +/- standard deviation C(max) of 90.1 +/- 29.6 ng/mL, with a median T(max) of 3.0 hours. The AUC(0-inf) for d-amphetamine was 1453 +/- 645.7 ng.h/mL. Complete elimination of the pro-drug occurred approximately 6 hours following the final dose on day 7. Adverse events were mild to moderate and similar to other oral amphetamines.

CONCLUSIONS

This study describes the steady-state pharmacokinetics of LDX, a new pro-drug stimulant. Possible study limitations include an open-label design and a small sample size.

Osmotic, controlled-release methylphenidate for the treatment of ADHD

Methylphenidate (MPH) is the most commonly used and best-studied stimulant medication for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. However, its short duration of action usually results in a requirement to administer multiple daily doses in order to achieve optimal clinical benefit. Although a wax-matrix-based SR formulation of MPH has been available since the 1990s, it was not well accepted into clinical practice. The variable absorption profile and lack of an immediate-release component results in a slower onset of action compared with immediate-release MPH. Hence, there was a need to develop alternative longer-lasting preparations of MPH that were as efficacious as IR MPH, but which also addressed the problems inherent in multiple daily dosing. An osmotic, controlled-release (OROS) formulation of MPH HCl has been developed over the past 10 years for once-daily administration. OROS MPH has been widely accepted by clinicians and is now the most widely prescribed MPH product in North America. Clinical trials have shown OROS MPH to have a continued action over a 12-h period, to be superior to placebo and to be as effective as immediate-release MPH dosed three times daily, in reducing symptoms of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, with similar incidence of side effects. There have been a smaller number of trials comparing OROS MPH with non-stimulant treatments, such as atomoxetine.

Clinical spectrum of the osmotic-controlled release oral delivery system (OROS), an advanced oral delivery form

BACKGROUND

The osmotic-controlled release oral delivery system, OROS, is an advanced drug delivery technology that uses osmotic pressure as the driving force to deliver pharmacotherapy, usually once-daily, in several therapeutic areas.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this review is to discuss the evolution of OROS technology and examine the many therapeutic areas where OROS products are being used.

METHODS

A search of Medline and EMBASE were performed using the keywords 'OROS' and 'osmotic delivery' for the period January 1990 to June 2005. Data were also obtained from the manufacturers' websites and associated publications.

RESULTS

OROS technology has evolved over the last 30 years, resulting in four systems: the elementary osmotic pump; the two-layer osmotic push-pull tablet; the advanced longitudinally compressed tablet multilayer formulation; and, the L-OROS system. OROS technology is employed for drug delivery in many therapeutic areas including: cardiovascular medicine, endocrinology, urology, and central nervous system (CNS) therapeutics. Two calcium channel blockers utilizing OROS technology for the treatment of hypertension are nifedipine and verapamil. Glipizide extended-release is used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Doxazosin is used for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia, and oxybutynin for overactive bladder. Most recent developments are with drugs that affect the CNS, including the use of methylphenidate for treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, paliperidone extended-release and OROS hydromorphone, which are under clinical development for schizophrenia and chronic pain, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Drug delivery using the various OROS products can result in an improved safety profile, stable drug concentrations, uniform drug effects, and reduced dosing frequency. OROS technology has also enabled the use of an effective starting dose, without the need for dose titration, which allows the achievement of symptom control much earlier than that observed with immediate-release preparations. Such attributes can enhance patient compliance and convenience, thereby ensuring efficacy and improving patient outcomes.

New drugs for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most common neuropsychiatric disorder of childhood. Recent research indicates that ADHD most often persists into adolescence and adulthood, and is associated with impairments in academic, social and occupational functioning. The ADHD diagnosis is based on history and clinical examination. There are no objective laboratory measures for diagnosis. ADHD is largely heritable. Its underlying pathophysiology has been theorised to include dysregulation of inhibitory noradrenergic frontocortical activity on dopaminergic striatal structures. Evidence shows that ADHD is highly responsive to pharmacological treatments resulting in global functional improvements. Although pharmacotherapy is recognised as the most effective treatment, additional components to optimise ADHD management include proper educational placement, parent management training and social skills development. Central nervous system stimulants, specifically methylphenidate and amphetamine, remain first-line pharmacological treatments. Atomoxetine, a selective noradrenergic re-uptake inhibitor, is the first non-stimulant compound to receive FDA approval for paediatric and adult ADHD. Other medication classes, including alpha-agonist antihypertensives, tricyclic antidepressants, other antidepressants such as buproprion, and the wake-promoting agent modafinil, are prescribed in off-label therapy. Ongoing development of new ADHD medications is expected to emphasise alternative and extended-release delivery systems and non-stimulant compounds.

Review and comparison of the long acting methylphenidate preparations

The stimulants have been the mainstay of pharmacologic treatment for over fifty years. Methylphenidate is the most frequently prescribed of the stimulant agents. In the past, one of the main drawbacks of these agents was the abbreviated duration of action. Over the last few years three longer acting methylphenidate preparations have been released to the market. Though all these agents contain the same chemical compound they do vary in a number of ways. In this article we will present how the formulations compare in their technology and the differences in their delivery systems. We will also compare the available literature that focus on head to head comparisons in terms of pharmacokinetics studies and those reports that present efficacy data. Finally, we will suggest based on a theoretical framework on how to approach selecting an agent based on the results of these trials and the individual needs of the patient.

New formulations of stimulants for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: therapeutic potential

New formulations of stimulant medications for the treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have been an important focus for pharmaceutical industry research and development over the past decade. In this article, we review and assess the therapeutic potential of five new stimulant formulations (one immediate release and four longer-acting preparations) that have recently become available for the treatment of ADHD. While the therapeutic potential of immediate-release enantiomers of methylphenidate has not yet been clinically realised, new long-acting formulations of stimulants have changed the standard of care for children, adolescents and adults with ADHD. The longer duration of action of these once-daily compounds, and the consequent expansion of the duration of daily ADHD coverage afforded by them, has introduced the realistic possibility of reducing the overall daily burden of ADHD on affected individuals. Although more expensive, these new stimulant formulations are easier for patients to use than older stimulants, more resistant to abuse and misuse, and allow for increased privacy of ADHD treatment at school or work.

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: an update

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most common neurobehavioral disorder, affecting 3% to 5% of school-aged children. Of the 3 subtypes--predominantly inattentive, predominantly hyperactive/impulsive, and a combined subtype--the latter is the most commonly represented group, accounting for 50% to 70% of all ADHD individuals. Stimulant medication is the cornerstone of management; however, stimulants with a short duration of action have been problematic for some patients. Recent technologic advances in delivery systems offer many patients the option of a once-daily dosage.

Advances in the Pharmacotherapy of Attention-Deficit–Hyperactivity Disorder: Focus on Methylphenidate Formulations

The psychostimulant dl-methylphenidate (MPH) remains the most common drug therapy in child and adolescent psychiatry for the treatment of attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Evidence of a dopaminergic basis both for the actions of MPH and for the underlying neuropathology in ADHD continues to mount. Advances in the biopharmaceutics of MPH have been conspicuous. Novel approaches to formulation design have resulted in new MPH delivery options to overcome the short-term actions of both immediate-and sustained-release MPH. New modified-release MPH products offer the convenience of once-daily administration while providing extended absorption profiles that better mimic those of standard schedules of immediate-release MPH (i.e., the absorption phase of MPH better correlates with improved behavioral response than does the elimination phase). The oral bioavailability of MPH in females may be lower than in males. The l-MPH isomer exhibits only negligible oral bioavailability and, further, possesses little intrinsic activity at the dopamine transporter. This notwithstanding, a single-isomer d-MPH immediate-release product is now available for dosing recommended at one-half that of dl-MPH.

Bioavailability of modified-release methylphenidate: influence of high-fat breakfast when administered intact and when capsule content sprinkled on applesauce

Ritalin, an immediate release form of racemic methylphenidate hydrochloride, has been available in the USA since 1955 and is used for the treatment of ADHD. The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of modified-release methylphenidate (highest single dose), Ritalin LA, when administered under fasting condition, with a high-fat breakfast, and when sprinkled on applesauce in healthy adult subjects. Blood samples were drawn for 24 h following a 40 mg oral administration. Most subjects appeared to produce a bimodal methylphenidate plasma concentration profile. In all three treatment groups, methylphenidate was rapidly absorbed with an initial average t(max(0-4)) of 1.3-2.4 h and an average peak plasma concentration [C(max(abs))] of 14.4-15.2 ng/ml. On average, both the rate [C(max(abs)) and t(max(abs))] and the extent of absorption (AUC(0- infinity)) of methylphenidate were similar when the capsule was given with a high fat breakfast and when the capsule contents were sprinkled onto applesauce, compared with the fasting state. No dose dumping was observed when the capsule was given with a high fat breakfast or when sprinkled onto applesauce. The dose was safe and generally well tolerated. Coadministration of a single oral dose of 40 mg methylphenidate capsule whether administered intact with a high-fat breakfast or sprinkled on applesauce did not affect the overall rate or extent of absorption of methylphenidate compared with the fasted condition.