1
|
Jaber S, Blanchard CT, Lu MY, Cozzi GD, Casey BM, Tita AT, Kim DJ, Szychowski JM, Subramaniam A. Contemporary Trends in Cesarean Delivery Rates and Indications. Am J Perinatol 2024; 41:e2026-e2033. [PMID: 37216971 DOI: 10.1055/a-2097-1958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to describe cesarean delivery rates and indications at a single center in order to assess the impact of the guidelines published by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine on trends in labor management. STUDY DESIGN This is a retrospective cohort study of patients ≥23 weeks' gestation delivering at a single tertiary care referral center from 2013 to 2018. Demographic characteristics, mode of delivery, and main indication for cesarean delivery were ascertained by individual chart review. Cesarean delivery indications (mutually exclusive) were the following: repeat cesarean delivery, nonreassuring fetal status, malpresentation, maternal indications (e.g., placenta previa or genital herpes simplex virus), failed labor (any stage labor arrest), or other (i.e., fetal anomaly and elective). Polynomial (cubic) regression models were used to model rates of cesarean delivery and indications over time. Subgroup analyses further examined trends in nulliparous women. RESULTS Of the 24,637 patients delivered during the study period, 24,050 were included in the analysis; 7,835 (32.6%) had a cesarean delivery. The rates of overall cesarean delivery were significantly different over time (p < 0.001), declining to a minimum of 30.9% in 2014 and peaking at 34.6% in 2018. With regard to the overall cesarean delivery indications, there were no significant differences over time. When limited to nulliparous patients, the rates of cesarean delivery were also noted to be significantly different over time (p = 0.02) nadiring at 30% in 2015 from 35.4% in 2013 and then rising up to 33.9% in 2018. As for nulliparous patients, there was no significant difference in primary cesarean delivery indications over time except for nonreassuring fetal status (p = 0.049). CONCLUSION Despite changes in labor management definitions and guidelines encouraging vaginal birth, the rates of overall cesarean delivery did not decrease over time. The indications for delivery, particularly failed labor, repeat cesarean delivery, and malpresentation have not significantly changed over time. KEY POINTS · The rates of overall cesarean deliveries did not decrease despite the 2014 published recommendations for the reduction in cesarean deliveries.. · There were no significant differences in the indications of cesarean deliveries among nulliparous or multiparous women.. · Despite the adoption of strategies to reduce the overall and primary cesarean delivery rates, these trends remain unchanged.. · Indications for delivery, particularly failed labor, repeat cesarean delivery, and malpresentation have also not significantly changed over time.. · Additional strategies to encourage and increase vaginal delivery rates must be adopted..
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Jaber
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beaumont Hospital Royal Oak, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Christina T Blanchard
- Center for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Michelle Y Lu
- Center for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Gabriella D Cozzi
- Center for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Brian M Casey
- Center for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Alan T Tita
- Center for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Dhong-Jin Kim
- Center for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Jeff M Szychowski
- Center for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Akila Subramaniam
- Center for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ramaiyer MS, Lulseged B, Glynn S, Esguerra C. Patient Experiences With Obstetric Counseling on Fetal Malpresentation. Cureus 2024; 16:e52683. [PMID: 38384619 PMCID: PMC10879653 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.52683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/21/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Fetal malpresentation is a complication of pregnancy in which the fetus does not present cephalically as required for vaginal birth. After a diagnosis is made, management options include cesarean section (CS) or external cephalic version (ECV). ECV is a procedure in which providers attempt to manually maneuver the fetus to cephalic position, allowing patients to attempt vaginal birth. Selecting between CS or ECV can be a complex and stressful decision, yet literature exploring patient perspectives on counseling of these options is limited. This study aims to describe patient perspectives on decision-making when diagnosed with fetal malpresentation. Methods We included English-speaking pregnant patients greater than 18 years of age diagnosed with malpresentation at 35-37 weeks' gestation. Patients who previously underwent CS or had maternal or fetal contraindications besides malpresentation to vaginal birth requiring CS were excluded. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants from four obstetric clinics in Baltimore, Maryland, at time of diagnosis. Themes were derived using data analysis in NVivo 11 (released 2015, Lumivero, USA). Results We recruited 10 participants (median age = 32 years, 90% Caucasian, 70% nulliparous, 50% chose ECV). We categorized our findings into the following themes: (1) facilitators and (2) barriers to deciding on malpresentation management, (3) participant priorities and values, and (4) other methods of malpresentation management. The participants identified incorporation of statistics and medical history into counseling as facilitators and the lack of information about ECV as a significant barrier. The participants prioritized fetal safety and, among those who chose ECV, a desire to avoid CS. Chiropractors, acupuncture, and moxibustion were identified as valuable additional methods of malpresentation management. Conclusion Overall, patients desire more information about ECV when diagnosed with fetal malpresentation. Uncertainty about ECV safety is a barrier to deciding between management options. Based on our findings, obstetric providers should provide comprehensive counseling on ECV and CS. Counseling should aim to demystify ECV and quantify risk in a patient-specific context. This will allow patients to make an informed decision on the management of fetal malpresentation that aligns with their goals for pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malini S Ramaiyer
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - Bethlehem Lulseged
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - Shannon Glynn
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - Cybill Esguerra
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Walker S, Spillane E, Stringer K, Meadowcroft A, Dasgupta T, Davies SM, Sandall J, Shennan A. The feasibility of team care for women seeking to plan a vaginal breech birth (OptiBreech 1): an observational implementation feasibility study in preparation for a pilot trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2023; 9:80. [PMID: 37173798 PMCID: PMC10175899 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-023-01299-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND OptiBreech Care is a care pathway for breech presentation at term, including where chosen, physiological breech birth attended by professionals with advanced training and/or proficiency. We aimed to assess the feasibility of implementing OptiBreech team care prior to proceeding with a planned pilot randomised controlled trial. METHODS Our design was an observational implementation feasibility assessment across England and Wales, January 2021-June 2022. Our objectives were to determine whether Trusts could provide attendants with advanced training (implementation feasibility), who deliver protocol-consistent care (fidelity), within existing resources (costs), while maintaining low neonatal admission rates (safety) and adequate recruitment rates (trial feasibility). Participants included women > 37 weeks pregnant with a breech-presenting foetus, requesting support for a vaginal breech birth following standard counselling, and staff involved in the study. No randomisation occurred in this first stage of feasibility work. RESULTS Thirteen National Health Service sites were recruited. A total of 82 women planned births in the study. Sites with a breech specialist midwife recruited at double the rate of sites without (0.90/month, 95% CI 0.64-1.16 vs 0.40, 95% CI 0.12-0.68). Referrals into the study came from midwives (46%), obstetricians (34%) and women themselves (20%). Vaginal births were attended by staff with OptiBreech training at 87.5% (35/40, 95% CI 0.732-0.958) and by staff who met additional proficiency criteria at 67.5% (27/40, 95% CI 0.509-0.814). Fidelity criteria were more consistently met by staff who also met proficiency criteria. There were four neonatal admissions (4.9%, 4/82), including one serious adverse outcome (1.2%, 1/82). CONCLUSIONS A prospective observational cohort of OptiBreech collaborative care, which could potentially support nested or cluster randomisation, appears feasible in sites willing to establish a dedicated clinic and strategically develop further proficient members of staff, with back-up plans for supporting rapidly progressing births. Randomisation procedures remain to be feasibility tested. It is funded by the NIHR (NIHR300582).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shawn Walker
- Department of Women & Children's Health, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
- Women's and Children's Services, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 369 Fulham Rd, London, SW10 9NH, UK.
| | - Emma Spillane
- Kingston Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Galsworthy Road, Surrey, Kingston upon Thames, KT2 7QB, UK
| | - Kate Stringer
- Surrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, East Surrey Hospital, Canada Avenue, Redhill, RH1 5RH, UK
| | - Amy Meadowcroft
- Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Oldham Hospital, Rochdale Road, Oldham, Greater Manchester, OL1 2JH, UK
| | - Tisha Dasgupta
- Department of Women & Children's Health, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Siân M Davies
- Department of Women & Children's Health, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Jane Sandall
- Department of Women & Children's Health, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Andrew Shennan
- Department of Women & Children's Health, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Evaluación del conocimiento de la versión cefálica externa y de las preferencias sobre el manejo de la presentación podálica a término entre mujeres en edad fértil. CLINICA E INVESTIGACION EN GINECOLOGIA Y OBSTETRICIA 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gine.2021.100680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
5
|
Why not plan an elective Caesarean section for breech presentation at term - safety first? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020; 252:572-573. [PMID: 32359770 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.03.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
6
|
Role of External Cephalic Version in Reducing the Cesarean Delivery Rate. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 133:855-856. [PMID: 30969225 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000003250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
7
|
Limaye M, Abdullahi N, Has P, Danilack VA, Froehlich R, Werner E. Factors Associated with Attempted External Cephalic Version for Fetal Malpresentation at Term. AJP Rep 2019; 9:e323-e327. [PMID: 31620311 PMCID: PMC6794123 DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1695748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2019] [Accepted: 06/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To assess differences in patient characteristics between women who did and did not undergo attempted external cephalic version (ECV) for fetal malpresentation at term. Study Design This was a retrospective cohort study of women with a singleton gestation and noncephalic presentation at > 37.0 weeks between October 2014 and October 2015. We compared demographic and clinical characteristics of women who did and did not undergo attempted ECV and assessed the reasons that women did not attempt ECV. Results Among 215 women, only 51 (24%) attempted ECV. There were no differences in age, race, insurance type, or body mass index between women who underwent attempted ECV and those who did not. Women who underwent ECV were significantly more likely to have had a prior vaginal delivery (69 vs. 36%, p < 0.001). Seventy-six women (46%) declined ECV. Women who declined ECV were more likely to be nulliparous than those who accepted the procedure (66 vs. 29%, p < 0.001). Among women who had ECV, the success rate was 55%. There were no adverse events after attempted ECV in this cohort. Conclusion Among women with fetal malpresentation at term, those without a prior vaginal delivery were significantly less likely to undergo attempted ECV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghana Limaye
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Najma Abdullahi
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Phinnara Has
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Valery A Danilack
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Rosemary Froehlich
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Erika Werner
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, Rhode Island
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Association Between Attempted External Cephalic Version and Perinatal Morbidity and Mortality. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 132:365-370. [PMID: 29995733 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000002699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine whether, with fetal malpresentation at term, perinatal morbidity and mortality differ between women who undergo an external cephalic version (ECV) attempt and those who do not and are expectantly managed. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women with nonanomalous singleton gestations in nonvertex presentation delivering at a tertiary care institution from 2006 to 2016. Women undergoing an ECV attempt at 37 weeks of gestation or greater were compared with those with nonvertex fetuses who did not undergo an ECV attempt and delivered at 37 weeks of gestation or greater. The primary outcome was a composite of perinatal morbidity and mortality including stillbirth, neonatal death within 72 hours, Apgar score less than 5 at 5 minutes, umbilical artery pH less than 7.0, base deficit 12 mmol/L or greater, or neonatal therapeutic hypothermia. Secondary outcomes were neonatal intensive care unit admission and neonatal anemia (hemoglobin value less than 13.5 g/dL). Bivariable and multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS Of the 4,117 women meeting eligibility criteria, 1,263 (30.7%) attempted ECV; 509 (40.3%) of these attempts resulted in successful versions. In bivariable analyses, women who underwent attempted ECV were more likely to be non-Hispanic white and multiparous and had lower mean body mass indexes. The composite perinatal morbidity and mortality outcome did not differ significantly between women who did and did not undergo attempted ECV (2.9% vs 2.5%, P=.46). The frequencies of neonatal intensive care unit admission (3.6% vs 3.3%, P=.53) and neonatal anemia (1.6% vs 1.2%, P=.36) were also similar. There continued to be no association between ECV attempt and composite perinatal morbidity and mortality outcome after adjustment for potential confounders (adjusted odds ratio 1.02, 95% CI 0.66-1.60). CONCLUSION Compared with expectant management, an ECV attempt at term is not associated with increased perinatal morbidity or mortality.
Collapse
|
9
|
Hickland P, Gargan P, Simpson J, McCabe N, Costa J. A novel and dedicated multidisciplinary service to manage breech presentation at term; 3 years of experience in a tertiary care maternity unit. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017; 31:3002-3008. [DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1362382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Hickland
- Royal Jubilee Maternity Service, Belfast, Northern Ireland
- Centre for Medical Education, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Phyl Gargan
- Royal Jubilee Maternity Service, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | | | - Niamh McCabe
- Royal Jubilee Maternity Service, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Janitha Costa
- Royal Jubilee Maternity Service, Belfast, Northern Ireland
- Centre for Medical Education, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
|
11
|
Watts NP, Petrovska K, Bisits A, Catling C, Homer CSE. This baby is not for turning: Women's experiences of attempted external cephalic version. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016; 16:248. [PMID: 27561416 PMCID: PMC5000477 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-016-1038-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2015] [Accepted: 08/11/2016] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Existing studies regarding women's experiences surrounding an External Cephalic Version (ECV) report on women who have a persistent breech post ECV and give birth by caesarean section, or on women who had successful ECVs and plan for a vaginal birth. There is a paucity of understanding about the experience of women who attempt an ECV then plan a vaginal breech birth when their baby remains breech. The aim of this study was to examine women's experience of an ECV which resulted in a persistent breech presentation. METHODS A qualitative descriptive exploratory design was undertaken. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted and analysed thematically. RESULTS Twenty two (n = 22) women who attempted an ECV and subsequently planned a vaginal breech birth participated. Twelve women had a vaginal breech birth (55 %) and 10 (45 %) gave birth by caesarean section. In relation to the ECV, there were five main themes identified: 'seeking an alternative', 'needing information', 'recounting the ECV experience', 'reacting to the unsuccessful ECV' and, 'reflecting on the value of an ECV'. CONCLUSIONS ECV should form part of a range of options provided to women, rather than a default procedure for management of the term breech. For motivated women who fit the safe criteria for vaginal breech birth, not being subjected to a painful experience (ECV) may be optimal. Women should be supported to access services that support vaginal breech birth if this is their choice, and continuity of care should be standard practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N P Watts
- Centre for Midwifery, Child and Family Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - K Petrovska
- Centre for Midwifery, Child and Family Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - A Bisits
- Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, Australia
| | - C Catling
- Centre for Midwifery, Child and Family Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - C S E Homer
- Centre for Midwifery, Child and Family Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Weiniger CF, Sultan P, Dunn A, Carvalho B. Survey of external cephalic version for breech presentation and neuraxial blockade use. J Clin Anesth 2016; 34:616-22. [PMID: 27687460 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.05.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2016] [Accepted: 05/26/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE Neuraxial blockade may increase external cephalic version (ECV) success rates. This survey aimed to assess the frequency and characteristics of neuraxial blockade used to facilitate ECV. SETTING AND DESIGN We surveyed Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology members regarding ECV practice using a 15-item survey developed by 3 obstetric anesthesiologists and tested for face validity. The survey was e-mailed in January 2015 and again in February 2015 to the 1056 Society of Obstetric Anesthesiology and Perinatology members. We present descriptive statistics of responses. PARTICIPANTS Our survey response rate was 322 of 1056 (30.5%). MAIN RESULT Neuraxial blockade was used for ECV always by 18 (5.6%), often by 52 (16.1%), sometimes by 98 (30.4%), rarely by 78 (24.2%), and never by 46 (14.3%) of respondents. An anesthetic sensory block target was selected by 141 (43.8%) respondents, and analgesic by 102 (31.7%) respondents. Epidural drug doses ranged widely, including sufentanil 5-25 μg; lidocaine 1% or 2% 10-20 mL, bupivacaine 0.0625% to 0.5% 6-15 mL, and ropivacaine 0.2% 20 mL. Intrathecal bupivacaine was used by 182 (56.5%) respondents; the most frequent doses were 2.5 mg used by 24 (7.5%), 7.5 mg used by 35 (10.9%), and 12 mg used by 30 (9.3%). CONCLUSIONS Neuraxial blockade is not universally offered to facilitate ECV, and there is wide variability in neuraxial blockade techniques, in drugs and doses administered, and in the sensory blockade (anesthetic or analgesic) targeted. Future studies need to evaluate and remove barriers to allow for more widespread use of neuraxial blockade for pain relief and to optimize ECV success rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn F Weiniger
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
| | - Pervez Sultan
- Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University College London Hospital, London, UK.
| | - Ashley Dunn
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
| | - Brendan Carvalho
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ebner F, Friedl TWP, Leinert E, Schramm A, Reister F, Lato K, Janni W, DeGregorio N. Predictors for a successful external cephalic version: a single centre experience. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015; 293:749-55. [DOI: 10.1007/s00404-015-3902-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2015] [Accepted: 09/24/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
14
|
Sharoni L, Lyell DJ, Weiniger CF. Too late to back out? Options for breech presentation management. J Epidemiol Community Health 2015; 69:1135-8. [PMID: 26139643 DOI: 10.1136/jech-2015-205528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Limor Sharoni
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Deirdre J Lyell
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Carolyn F Weiniger
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Walker S, Perilakalathil P, Moore J, Gibbs CL, Reavell K, Crozier K. Standards for midwife practitioners of external cephalic version: A Delphi study. Midwifery 2015; 31:e79-86. [DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2014] [Revised: 01/06/2015] [Accepted: 01/11/2015] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
16
|
Sharoni L, Weiniger CF. Anesthesia and External Cephalic Version. CURRENT ANESTHESIOLOGY REPORTS 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/s40140-014-0095-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|