1
|
Gaid D, Eilayyan O, Ahmed S, Bussières A. Enrollment, adherence and retention rates among musculoskeletal disorders rehabilitation practitioners in knowledge translation studies: a systematic review and meta-regression. Implement Sci Commun 2024; 5:51. [PMID: 38702833 PMCID: PMC11069130 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-024-00585-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Practitioners' enrollment, adherence, and retention rates influence estimates of effectiveness in knowledge translation (KT) studies and remain important concerns for implementation researchers. This review aimed to systematically summarize the current evidence on feasibility measures as gauged by enrollment, adherence, and retention rates in KT evaluation studies targeting rehabilitation practitioners treating musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). METHODS We searched five electronic databases from the inception to October 2022. We included KT studies that 1) had designs recommended by the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care, 2) targeted rehabilitation practitioners managing patients with MSDs, 3) delivered KT interventions according to the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change classification, and 4) reported on the feasibility measures (e.g., enrollment, adherence, and retention). Descriptive statistics were conducted to report on study-, practitioners- and intervention-related factors influencing enrollment, adherence, and retention rates. Meta-regression weighted by the sample size of included studies was used to estimate the effect of factors on overall enrollment, adherence, and retention rates. RESULTS Findings from 33 KT studies reported weighted enrolment, adherence, and retention rate of 82% (range: 32%-100%), 74% (range: 44%-100%), and 65% (range: 36%-100%) respectively for both intervention and control groups. Factors positively influencing enrollment, adherence, and retention rates included designing short study period with short duration intervention. CONCLUSIONS Intense (e.g., high frequency, short duration) single KT intervention was more appealing for practitioners. Future evaluation studies should clearly report follow-up data, and practitioners' prior training, Results may not apply to non-MSD healthcare providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Gaid
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| | - O Eilayyan
- Department of Physical Therapy, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - S Ahmed
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Centre de recherche interdisciplinaire en réadaptation du Montréal métropolitain (CRIR), Montreal, QC, Canada
- The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre (RI-MUHC), Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - A Bussières
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Département Chiropratique, Université du Québec à Trois Rivières (UQTR), Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rebbeck T, Bandong AN, Leaver A, Ritchie C, Armfield N, Arora M, Cameron ID, Connelly LB, Daniell R, Gillett M, Ingram R, Jagnoor J, Kenardy J, Mitchell G, Refshauge K, Scotti Requena S, Robins S, Sterling M. Implementation of a risk-stratified, guideline-based clinical pathway of care to improve health outcomes following whiplash injury (Whiplash ImPaCT): a multicentre, randomized, controlled trial. Pain 2023; 164:2216-2227. [PMID: 37318019 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Current pathways of care for whiplash follow a "stepped care model," result in modest treatment outcomes and fail to offer efficient management solutions. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a risk-stratified clinical pathway of care (CPC) compared with usual care (UC) in people with acute whiplash. We conducted a multicentre, 2-arm, parallel, randomised, controlled trial in primary care in Australia. Participants with acute whiplash (n = 216) were stratified for risk of a poor outcome (low vs medium/high risk) and randomised using concealed allocation to either the CPC or UC. In the CPC group, low-risk participants received guideline-based advice and exercise supported by an online resource, and medium-risk/high-risk participants were referred to a whiplash specialist who assessed modifiable risk factors and then determined further care. The UC group received care from their primary healthcare provider who had no knowledge of risk status. Primary outcomes were neck disability index (NDI) and Global Rating of Change (GRC) at 3 months. Analysis blinded to group used intention-to-treat and linear mixed models. There was no difference between the groups for the NDI (mean difference [MD] [95% confidence interval (CI)] -2.34 [-7.44 to 2.76]) or GRC (MD 95% CI 0.08 [-0.55 to 0.70]) at 3 months. Baseline risk category did not modify the effect of treatment. No adverse events were reported. Risk-stratified care for acute whiplash did not improve patient outcomes, and implementation of this CPC in its current form is not recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trudy Rebbeck
- Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Aila Nica Bandong
- Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Physical Therapy, The University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines
| | - Andrew Leaver
- Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Carrie Ritchie
- RECOVER Injury Research Centre and National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Centre of Research Excellence: Better Health Outcomes for Compensable Injury, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Nigel Armfield
- RECOVER Injury Research Centre and National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Centre of Research Excellence: Better Health Outcomes for Compensable Injury, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Mohit Arora
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ian D Cameron
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Luke B Connelly
- Centre for the Business and Economics of Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Departimento di Sociologia e Diritto Dell'Economia Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
| | - Roy Daniell
- Belconnen Physiotherapy Clinic, Canberra, Australia
| | - Mark Gillett
- Emergency Department, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rodney Ingram
- Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jagnoor Jagnoor
- The George Institute for Global Health, School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Justin Kenardy
- School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Geoffrey Mitchell
- Primary Care Clinical Unit, School of Medicine, University of Queensland Brisbane, Australia
| | - Kathryn Refshauge
- Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Simone Scotti Requena
- RECOVER Injury Research Centre and National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Centre of Research Excellence: Better Health Outcomes for Compensable Injury, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sarah Robins
- RECOVER Injury Research Centre and National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Centre of Research Excellence: Better Health Outcomes for Compensable Injury, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Michele Sterling
- RECOVER Injury Research Centre and National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Centre of Research Excellence: Better Health Outcomes for Compensable Injury, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lyu X, Li S. Professional medical education approaches: mobilizing evidence for clinicians. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1071545. [PMID: 37575990 PMCID: PMC10419302 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1071545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Rapidly proliferating high-quality evidence supports daily decision-making in clinical practice. Continuing professional medical education links this evidence to practicing clinicians who are strongly motivated to improve the quality of their care by using the latest information. Approaches to professional education vary, and their effects depend on specific scenarios. This narrative review summarizes the main approaches for professional medical education that facilitate the mobilization of evidence for clinicians. It includes traditional learning (passive and active dissemination of educational materials, lectures, and mass media dissemination), constructivist learning (engaging in local consensus processes and education outreach visits, interfacing with local opinion leaders, conducting patient-mediated interventions, employing audit and feedback processes, and utilizing clinical decision-supporting systems), and blended learning approaches (the integration of in-person or online passive learning with active and creative learning by the learners). An optimized selection from these approaches is challenging but critical to clinicians and healthcare systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiafei Lyu
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Sheyu Li
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Division of Guideline and Rapid Recommendation, Cochrane China Center, MAGIC China Center, Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gaid D, Ahmed S, Thomas A, Bussières A. Barriers and Facilitators to Knowledge Brokering Activities: Perspectives from Knowledge Brokers Working in Canadian Rehabilitation Settings. THE JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS 2023; 43:87-95. [PMID: 36859412 DOI: 10.1097/ceh.0000000000000475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Knowledge translation experts advocate for employing knowledge brokers (KBs) to promote the uptake of research evidence in health care settings. Yet, no previous research has identified potential barriers for KBs to promote the uptake of research evidence in rehabilitation settings. This study aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators for KBs in Canadian rehabilitation settings as perceived by individuals serving as KBs. METHODS Qualitative study using semistructured telephone interviews with individuals performing KB activities in rehabilitation settings across Canada. The interview topic guide was informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and consisted of 20 questions covering three domains (characteristics of individuals, inner setting, and outer settings). We conducted qualitative descriptive analysis combining deductive coding guided by the CFIR. RESULTS Characteristics of individuals included having communication skills, clinical experience, research skills, and interpersonal features, in addition to being confident and motivated and receiving training. The inner setting domain included having constant networking with stakeholders and being aware of stakeholders' needs, in addition to resources availability, leadership engagement, knowledge accessibility, prioritizing brokering activities, and monitoring KBs' performance. Finally, the outer setting domain showed that KBs need to be connected to a community of practice to promote information exchange and avoid work duplications. DISCUSSION Factors likely to hinder or promote the optimal use of KBs within Canadian rehabilitation settings include skill sets and networking abilities; organizational culture, resources, and leadership engagement; and the need for specific training for KBs and for evaluation tools to monitor their performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dina Gaid
- Dr. Gaid: McGill University, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, and The Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Dr. Ahmed: McGill University, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, and The Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal, Quebec, Canada, and Research Institute McGill University Health Center, Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Dr. Thomas: McGill University, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, and The Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal, Quebec, Canada, and Institute of Health Sciences Education, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Dr. Bussières: Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada, and McGill University, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, and The Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bandong AN, Rebbeck T, Mackey M, Sterling M, Kelly J, Ritchie C, Leaver A. Selective acceptance of acute whiplash guidelines: a qualitative analysis of perceptions of health professionals in Australia. Disabil Rehabil 2022:1-8. [PMID: 35654750 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2080286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore health professionals' acceptance of the guidelines for acute whiplash associated disorders (WAD), and to identify barriers and facilitators to adherence. MATERIALS AND METHODS Qualitative descriptive study involving focus group discussions among health professionals who treat people with WAD in primary and secondary care settings in New South Wales and Queensland, Australia. Twenty-eight health professionals (physiotherapists = 19; chiropractors = 6; osteopaths = 3) participated in six semi-structured focus group discussions that were held in independent offices in Sydney and Brisbane, Australia between September and December 2015. Discussions were audio recorded and verbatim, de-identified transcripts produced. Thematic analysis was conducted using an inductive approach to identify commonly held beliefs. RESULTS Acceptance of guideline recommendations appeared to be influenced by factors related to the guideline itself, practitioner and practice characteristics, and patient-related factors. Specifically, acceptance was hindered by conflicting belief systems, ambiguity in guideline recommendations, and patient characteristics and expectations. CONCLUSIONS Practitioners demonstrated a positive attitude towards the use of the guidelines in general; however, in some cases, acceptance of key recommendations appeared selective. Future guideline revision and implementation might focus on explaining the underlying principles of the guidelines, providing more detailed recommendations, and involving strategies that challenge inconsistent beliefs and promote informed decision-making. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONSelective acceptance of guideline recommendations in favour of those not requiring practice change may present a challenge for the implementation of evidence-based practice in the management of whiplash.Participants demonstrated variable, sometimes polar attitudes to guideline key messages and recommendations.Guideline developers need to focus more strongly on changing practitioner beliefs and attitudes, as well as better explaining the underlying principles of the guidelines, and providing more detailed recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aila Nica Bandong
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,College of Allied Medical Professions, The University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines
| | - Trudy Rebbeck
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Kolling Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Martin Mackey
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Michele Sterling
- Recover Injury Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia.,Centre of Research Excellence in Road Traffic Injury Recovery, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia
| | - Joan Kelly
- Griffith University, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Carrie Ritchie
- Recover Injury Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia
| | - Andrew Leaver
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gaid D, Ahmed S, Thomas A, Bussières A. Profiling knowledge brokers in the rehabilitation sector across Canada: A descriptive study. J Eval Clin Pract 2022; 28:303-314. [PMID: 34611962 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE Knowledge brokers (KBs) can help promote the uptake of the latest research evidence into clinical practice. Little is known about who they are, the types of roles they perform, and the training they receive. Establishing a portrait of Canadian KBs working in the rehabilitation sector may inform health care organizations and knowledge translation specialists on how best to advance KBs practices. The overall goal was to describe the profile of KBs working to promote the uptake of evidence within rehabilitation settings in Canada. Specifically, this study aimed to describe the sociodemographic and professional characteristics, work activities, and training of KBs. METHODS A cross-sectional online survey was administered to KBs working in rehabilitation settings across Canada. The survey included 20 questions covering sociodemographic and professional characteristics, work activities, and training opportunities. Response frequency and percentage were calculated for all categorical variables, and the weighted average (WA) for each role was calculated across participants. Descriptive analysis was conducted for all open-ended questions. RESULTS Of 475 participants accessing the website, 198 completed the survey questionnaire, including 99 clinicians, 35 researchers, and 26 managers. While over two-thirds of respondents had completed a graduate degree, only 38% reported receiving KBs-related training. The respondents' primary roles corresponded to a linking agent (WA = 1.84), followed by capacity builder (WA = 1.76), information manager (WA = 1.71), facilitator (WA = 1.41), and evaluator (WA = 1.32). CONCLUSIONS KBs are mostly expert clinicians who tend to perform brokering activities part-time targeting their peers. Participants mostly perform the linking agent, capacity builder, and information roles. Moreover, only a few participants received formal training to perform brokering activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dina Gaid
- McGill University, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, The Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montréal (CRIR), Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Sara Ahmed
- McGill University, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, The Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montréal (CRIR), Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Aliki Thomas
- McGill University, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, The Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montréal (CRIR), Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - André Bussières
- McGill University, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, The Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montréal (CRIR), Montreal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kang K, Evans K, Simic M, Ferreira P, Bandong AN, Coates S, Beales D, Rebbeck T. Impact of an interactive workshop on specialist physiotherapists' practice when implementing a new clinical care pathway for people with musculoskeletal conditions. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2022; 57:102466. [PMID: 34742051 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Revised: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A new pathway of care proposes early comprehensive assessment and targeted management by specialist musculoskeletal clinicians for people with musculoskeletal conditions at risk of poor outcomes. Adoption of this care pathway is likely to be influenced by beliefs and behaviours of specialist musculoskeletal clinicians. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of an interactive educational workshop about the proposed clinical care pathway on knowledge, beliefs and practice of specialist musculoskeletal physiotherapists. DESIGN Mixed methods. METHODS Fifty specialist musculoskeletal physiotherapists participated in a 2-day interactive educational workshop. Knowledge, beliefs and clinical practice behaviours were assessed immediately before the workshop and 3 months' later using surveys. RESULTS Knowledge about key guideline messages improved and were maintained at follow-up. Most participants agreed to provide more targeted interventions to patients at risk of poor outcome (92%, 95% CI: 81%-98%) and utilise prognostic screening tools (84%, 95% CI: 71 to 93). However, only 56% (95% CI: 39%-68%) of participants believed implementing a shared care pathway was easy. At follow-up, participants' beliefs were more aligned with the proposed care pathway (i.e., shared care: 83%, 95% CI: 68%-93%). With respect to clinical practice, there were 16% more referrals back to the primary physiotherapist at 3 months than before the workshop. Barriers (practitioner, patient and system factors) to implementation of the care pathway were discussed. CONCLUSION An interactive educational workshop influenced specialist musculoskeletal physiotherapists' knowledge, beliefs and clinical practice, but barriers need to be overcome to facilitate widespread implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kwangil Kang
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Kerrie Evans
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Sydney, Australia; Healthia Limited, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Milena Simic
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Sydney, Australia
| | - Paulo Ferreira
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Sydney, Australia
| | - Aila Nica Bandong
- University of the Philippines, College of Allied Medical Professions, Manila, Philippines
| | - Sonia Coates
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Sydney, Australia
| | - Darren Beales
- Curtin University, School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Trudy Rebbeck
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gaid D, Mate K, Ahmed S, Thomas A, Bussières A. Nationwide Environmental Scan of Knowledge Brokers Training. THE JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS 2022; 42:e3-e11. [PMID: 33929357 PMCID: PMC8876370 DOI: 10.1097/ceh.0000000000000355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Knowledge brokers (KBs) can promote the uptake of best practice guidelines in rehabilitation. Although many institutions offer training opportunities to health care professionals who wish to undertake KBs roles, the characteristics and content of those educational training opportunities (ETOs) are currently unknown. This study aimed to describe the ETOs available to rehabilitation professionals in Canada and determine whether the ETOs meet the competencies expected of the KBs roles. METHODS We conducted a Canada-wide environmental scan to identify ETOs using three strategies: online search, phone calls, and snowball. To be included in the study, ETOs had to be offered to rehabilitation professionals in Canada and be targeting KBs competencies and/or roles. We mapped each of the content to the KBs competencies (knowledge and skills) within the five roles of KBs: information manager, linking agent, capacity builder, facilitator, and evaluator. RESULTS A total of 51 ETOs offered in three Canadian provinces, British Columbia, Ontario, and Quebec, were included in the analysis. For KBs competencies, 76% of ETOs equipped attendees with research skills, 55% with knowledge brokering skills, and 53% with knowledge on implementation science. For KBs roles, over 60% of ETOs supported attendees to in performing the capacity builder role and 39% the evaluator role. DISCUSSION Findings suggest that ETOs focused primarily on preparing participants with the research and knowledge brokering skills required to perform the capacity builder and evaluator roles. Comprehensive educational training covering all KBs roles and competencies are needed.
Collapse
|
9
|
Beusink M, Broeks A, van Kemenade FJ, Lam KH, Schmidt MK, Rebers S. Barriers and Facilitators for Implementing a National Guideline to Foster the Responsible Use of Residual Biospecimens and Data in Health Research. Biopreserv Biobank 2021; 20:67-74. [PMID: 34582256 DOI: 10.1089/bio.2020.0164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Residual biospecimens that are stored in hospitals' diagnostic specimen archives can be used for scientific research under strict legal and ethical regulations. In the Netherlands, a Code of Conduct governs responsible secondary use of residual biospecimens. However, implementation of this Code seems to be challenging. This study aims to explore the most important factors that facilitate or hinder the implementation of the Code. In addition, it investigates what is needed to further foster the responsible use of residual biospecimens. A mixed-methods design was used. Questionnaires were sent out to pathologists, patient information centers, physicians, researchers, data protection officers (DPOs), members of research ethics committees, and members of the boards of directors of all hospitals in the Netherlands (81 hospitals). To further investigate the barriers and facilitators, interviews were conducted with pathologists, patient information centers, physician-researchers, DPOs, review boards, research coordinators, and quality managers of pathology departments. In total, 246 respondents filled out the questionnaire and 36 interviews were conducted. Major barriers for implementing were a lack of resources (time, money), a lack of attention for responsible use, and a lack of practical knowledge (knowing what to do, where to go with questions). In contrast, the perception that implementing the Code was necessary, either by the respondent or by colleagues, was considered "a driver" for implementation. Practical instruments such as checklists and roadmaps were considered necessary to foster implementation; however, the creation of such instruments was hindered by a lack of clear-cut answers regarding legal aspects. Therefore, more clarity and harmonization on how to interpret both the Code and legislation regarding secondary use were considered necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Beusink
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annegien Broeks
- Core Facility-Molecular Pathology and Biobanking, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - King H Lam
- Pathology Department, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marjanka K Schmidt
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Susanne Rebers
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gaid D, Ahmed S, Alhasani R, Thomas A, Bussières A. Determinants that influence knowledge brokers' and opinion leaders' role to close knowledge practice gaps in rehabilitation: A realist review. J Eval Clin Pract 2021; 27:836-846. [PMID: 32975895 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2020] [Revised: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE Despite the available evidence to support optimal practices in rehabilitation, significant knowledge practice gaps persist. Opinion leaders (OLs) and knowledge brokers (KBs) can enhance the success of knowledge translation (KT) interventions and improve uptake of best practices among clinicians. However, the literature on the mechanisms underpinning OLs'/KBs' activities, and guidance on the type of support needed for successful implementation of these roles in rehabilitation contexts is scarce. This research aimed to highlight the differences and similarities between OLs and KBs with respect to context, mechanism, and outcomes as well as describe the common patterns of OLs and KBs by creating a context-mechanism-outcomes configuration. METHODS We conducted a realist review to synthesize the available evidence on OLs/KBs as active KT strategies. A search was conducted across five databases up to November 2019. Two independent reviewers extracted the data using a structured form. A context-mechanism-outcome configuration was used to conceptualize a cumulative portrait of the features of OLs/KBs roles. RESULTS The search identified 3282 titles after removing duplicates. Seventeen studies (reported in 20 articles) were included in the review. Findings suggest a number of desirable features of OLs/KBs roles that may maximize the achievement of targeted outcomes namely being (a) embedded within their organization as "insiders"; (b) adequately skilled to perform their role; (c) identified as able to fulfil the role; (d) appropriately trained; and (e) able to use different KT interventions. CONCLUSION Findings of this realist review converge to create a context-mechanism-outcomes configuration with suggestions to optimally utilize OLs/KBs in rehabilitation. The configurations suggest desirable features that can lead to a greater potential to achieve targeted goals. It is preferable that OLs/KBs be embedded in the organization and that they are adequately skilful and well-trained. Also, OLs/KBs should perform the required roles using KT interventions adapted to the local context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dina Gaid
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,The Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montréal (CRIR), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Sara Ahmed
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,The Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montréal (CRIR), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Rehab Alhasani
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Aliki Thomas
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,The Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montréal (CRIR), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - André Bussières
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,The Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montréal (CRIR), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sorondo D, Delpierre C, Côté P, Salmi LR, Cedraschi C, Taylor-Vaisey A, Lemeunier N. Determinants of clinical practice guidelines' utilization for the management of musculoskeletal disorders: a scoping review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2021; 22:507. [PMID: 34074285 PMCID: PMC8170973 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04204-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Context Many clinical practice guidelines have been developed for the management of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). However, there is a gap between evidence-based knowledge and clinical practice, and reasons are poorly understood. Understanding why healthcare providers use clinical practice guidelines is essential to improve their implementation, dissemination, and adherence. Aim To identify determinants of clinical practice guidelines’ utilization by health care providers involved in the assessment and management of MSDs. Method A scoping review of the literature was conducted. Three databases were searched from inception to March 2021. Article identification, study design, methodological quality, type of healthcare providers, MSDs, barriers and facilitators associated with guidelines’ utilization were extracted from selected articles. RESULTS: 8671 citations were retrieved, and 43 articles were selected. 51% of studies were from Europe, and most were quantitative studies (64%) following a cross-sectional design (88%). Almost 80% of articles dealt with low back pain guidelines, and the most studied healthcare providers were general practitioners or physiotherapists. Five main barriers to guideline utilization were expressed by providers: 1) disagreement between recommendations and patient expectations; 2) guidelines not specific to individual patients; 3) unfamiliarity with “non-specific” term, or with the bio psychosocial model of MSDs; 4) time consuming; and 5) heterogeneity in guideline methods. Four main facilitators to guideline utilization were cited: 1) clinician’s interest in evidence-based practice; 2) perception from clinicians that the guideline will improve triage, diagnosis and management; 3) time efficiency; and 4) standardized language. Conclusion Identifying modifiable determinants is the first step in developing implementation strategies to improve guideline utilization in clinical practice. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04204-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Delphine Sorondo
- UMR1295, Toulouse III University, Inserm, Equipe EQUITY, Equipe constitutive du CERPOP, Toulouse, France. .,Institut Franco-Européen de Chiropraxie, 72 chemin de la Flambère-31,300, Toulouse, France.
| | - Cyrille Delpierre
- UMR1295, Toulouse III University, Inserm, Equipe EQUITY, Equipe constitutive du CERPOP, Toulouse, France
| | - Pierre Côté
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada.,Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation at Ontario Tech University and the Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Oshawa and Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Louis-Rachid Salmi
- Univ. Bordeaux, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219-Bordeaux Population Health, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.,CHU de Bordeaux, Pôle de santé publique, Service d'Information Médicale, F-33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Christine Cedraschi
- Division of General Medical Rehabilitation, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.,Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Multidisciplinary Pain Centre, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Anne Taylor-Vaisey
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada.,Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation at Ontario Tech University and the Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Oshawa and Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nadège Lemeunier
- UMR1295, Toulouse III University, Inserm, Equipe EQUITY, Equipe constitutive du CERPOP, Toulouse, France.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sterling M, Rebbeck T, Connelly LB, Leaver A, Ritchie C, Bandong A, Mackey M, Cameron ID, Mitchell G, Arora M, Armfield NR. A randomised controlled trial of implementation of a guideline-based clinical pathway of care to improve health outcomes following whiplash injury (Whiplash ImPaCT): Statistical analysis plan. Braz J Phys Ther 2021; 25:471-480. [PMID: 34119443 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2021.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Revised: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Statistical analysis plans describe the processes of data handling and analysis in clinical trials; by doing so they increase the transparency of the analysis and reporting of studies. This paper reports the planned statistical analysis plan for the Whiplash ImPaCT study. For individuals with whiplash injury, Whiplash ImPaCT aims to assess the effectiveness of a guidelines-based clinical pathway of care compared with usual care. METHODS We report the planned procedures, methods, and reporting for the primary and secondary analyses of the Whiplash ImPaCT study. The primary outcomes are Global Recovery and Neck Disability Index at 3 months post-randomisation. Outcomes will be analysed according to the intention to treat principle using linear mixed models. A cost-utility analysis will be conducted to compute the incremental cost-effectiveness of the intervention to usual care. We describe data handling, our analytical approach, assumptions about missing data, and our planned methods of reporting. DISCUSSION This paper will provide a detailed description of the planned analyses for the Whiplash ImPaCT trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Sterling
- RECOVER Injury Research Centre, NHMRC CRE in Road Traffic Injury Recovery, The University of Queensland, Australia.
| | - Trudy Rebbeck
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Discipline of Physiotherapy, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Luke B Connelly
- Centre for Business and Economics of Health, The University of Queensland, Australia; and Faculty of Economics and Statistics, The University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrew Leaver
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Discipline of Physiotherapy, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Carrie Ritchie
- RECOVER Injury Research Centre, NHMRC CRE in Road Traffic Injury Recovery, The University of Queensland, Australia
| | - Aila Bandong
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Discipline of Physiotherapy, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; College of Allied Medical Professions, The University of the Philippines Manila, Philippines
| | - Martin Mackey
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Discipline of Physiotherapy, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ian D Cameron
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, New South Wales, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School - Northern, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Geoffrey Mitchell
- Discipline of General Practice, School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
| | - Mohit Arora
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, New South Wales, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School - Northern, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nigel R Armfield
- RECOVER Injury Research Centre, NHMRC CRE in Road Traffic Injury Recovery, The University of Queensland, Australia; Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Comparison of the Accuracy of WhipPredict to That of a Modified Version of the Short-Form Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire to Predict Poor Recovery After Whiplash Injury. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2021; 51:207-215. [PMID: 33607916 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2021.9987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the accuracy of a whiplash-specific risk screening tool (WhipPredict) with that of the modified generic short-form Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire (SF-ÖMPSQ) for predicting poor recovery in patients following whiplash injury. STUDY DESIGN Inception cohort study. METHODS Two hundred two participants with acute whiplash completed the WhipPredict and modified SF-ÖMPSQ at baseline. Poor recovery was measured at 6 and 12 months using the Neck Disability Index (greater than 10%), numeric pain-rating scale (greater than 3/10), global perceived recovery (less than +4), and inability to return to preinjury work level. Accuracy statistics were calculated to predict poor recovery. RESULTS Seventy-one percent (n = 143) of participants completed the 6-month assessment and 56% (n = 113) completed the 12-month assessment. At baseline, agreement between the WhipPredict and modified SF-ÖMPSQ was fair (prevalence-adjusted and bias-adjusted κ = 0.26; 95% confidence interval: 0.12, 0.39). Depending on the outcome, 20% to 72% of people had not recovered at 6 months and 12% to 71% had not recovered at 12 months. At 6 and 12 months, the WhipPredict tool showed high sensitivity (88%-96%) and low specificity (all outcomes less than 31%) on all 4 separate outcomes. The modified SF-ÖMPSQ showed moderate sensitivity (67%-75%) for the Neck Disability Index, numeric pain-rating scale, and global perceived recovery, high sensitivity for return to work (81%-90%), and moderate specificity (54%-77%) for all 4 outcomes. CONCLUSION Both tools showed acceptable accuracy in predicting poor recovery. The WhipPredict tool is recommended to correctly identify patients who will not recover but may falsely classify those who recover well. Using the modified SF-ÖMPSQ will result in fewer patients falsely categorized as being at risk of poor recovery and may result in some people being undertreated. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2021;51(5):207-215. Epub 19 Feb 2021. doi:10.2519/jospt.2021.9987.
Collapse
|
14
|
Haider T, Dunstan DA, Bhullar N. Psychologists’ Application of Clinical Guidelines and Recommended Protocols and Procedures within State Insurance Regulatory Authority Insurance Frameworks: Outcomes for Injured Patients with Musculoskeletal Injuries. AUSTRALIAN PSYCHOLOGIST 2020. [DOI: 10.1111/ap.12354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tahira Haider
- School of Behavioural, Cognitive and Social Sciences, University of New England,
| | - Debra A. Dunstan
- School of Behavioural, Cognitive and Social Sciences, University of New England,
| | - Navjot Bhullar
- School of Behavioural, Cognitive and Social Sciences, University of New England,
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ortuño-Soriano I, Muñoz-Jiménez D, Moreno-Casbas T, Albornos-Muñoz L, González-María E. Evaluation of implementation strategies of the Best Practices Spotlight Organisations (BPSO) Project in Spain. ENFERMERIA CLINICA 2020; 30:222-230. [PMID: 32389600 DOI: 10.1016/j.enfcli.2019.10.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2019] [Revised: 10/14/2019] [Accepted: 10/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify favourable elements and barriers to implementation in the Program of Best Practice Spotlight Organization® that establish clinical practice guidelines of the Registered Nurse' Association of Ontario, so that future experiences could benefit from the assessments presented here. METHOD Evaluation research study of the process of implementing guidelines in institutions that make up the first two cohorts of the programme in Spain, through analysis of contents of implantation reports and inductive process, reading, interpretation, coding and categorized according to SWOT structure: Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. RESULTS Reports from 18 centres in 12 Autonomous Communities have been analyzed, including 22 different guidelines. As weaknesses, problems related to information systems and their exploitation stand out for frequency and intensity. Other elements related to dissemination of results, to professionals, care and factors related to the institution are presented. Standing out as threats are the instability of staff and continued changes in Senior Management or corporate policies. Among the strengths, the exclusive dedication of personnel to the project and its link to institutional objectives are distinguished. As opportunities, the possibility of standardized comparison of own results with others, as well as the dissemination of results are highlighted. CONCLUSION A useful pattern is set up to approach implementation in other scenarios, where changes in professional culture, training, communication and leadership, as well as aligning interests of managers and politicians, facilitate ideal conditions for Evidence-Based Practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ismael Ortuño-Soriano
- Área de Procesos, Investigación, Innovación y Sistemas de Información, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, España
| | - Daniel Muñoz-Jiménez
- Área de Procesos, Investigación, Innovación y Sistemas de Información, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, España; Unidad de Investigación en Cuidados y Servicios de Salud (Investén-isciii), REDISSEC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España.
| | - Teresa Moreno-Casbas
- Unidad de Investigación en Cuidados y Servicios de Salud (Investén-isciii), CIBERFES, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España
| | - Laura Albornos-Muñoz
- Unidad de Investigación en Cuidados y Servicios de Salud (Investén-isciii), REDISSEC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España
| | - Esther González-María
- Unidad de Investigación en Cuidados y Servicios de Salud (Investén-isciii), CIBERFES, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lanhers C, Poizat S, Pereira B, Auclair C, Perrier C, Schmidt J, Gerbaud L, Coudeyre E. Measuring the impact of the French version of The Whiplash Book on both treatment approach and fear-avoidance beliefs among emergency physicians. A cluster randomized controlled trial. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0229849. [PMID: 32187610 PMCID: PMC7080520 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2017] [Accepted: 02/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Whiplash-associated disorders have been the subject of much attention in the scientific literature and remain a major public health problem. Objective Measure the impact of a validated information booklet on the fear-avoidance beliefs of emergency physicians and their approach to management regarding the treatment of whiplash-associated disorders. Methods A prospective cluster randomized controlled study conducted with a sample of emergency medicine physicians. Fear-avoidance beliefs were measured using The Whiplash Belief Questionnaire (WBQ) and Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). We assessed the approach to management based on the prescription of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments based on the advice given to patients. The validated information booklet was the French version of The Whiplash Book. A set of questionnaires was sent to participants pre- and post-intervention. The experimental intervention was the provision of The Whiplash Book. The control arm did not receive any training or information. Results Mean fears and beliefs scores on inclusion were high: WBQ = 19.09 (± 4.06); physical activity FABQ = 11.45 (± 4.73); work FABQ = 13.85 (± 6.70). Improvement in fear-avoidance beliefs scores being greater in the intervention group was further confirmed by the variation in WBQ (-20 [-32; -6] vs. -6 [-16; 9]; p = 0.06), physical activity FABQ (-70 [-86; -50] vs. -15 [-40; 11]; p < 0.001), and work FABQ (-40 [-71; 0] vs. 0 [-31; 50]; p = 0.02). The emergency physicians' initial approach to management was not consistent with current guidelines. Reading the French version of The Whiplash Book could contribute to changing their approach to management in several areas on intra-group analysis. Conclusion The French version of The Whiplash Book positively influenced fear-avoidance beliefs among emergency physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Lanhers
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France
- Clermont-Ferrand Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
- * E-mail:
| | - Stéphane Poizat
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France
- Clermont-Ferrand Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Bruno Pereira
- Innovation and Clinical Research, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Candy Auclair
- Department of Public Health, Biostatistics Unit, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Christophe Perrier
- Emergency Department, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Jeannot Schmidt
- Clermont-Ferrand Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
- Emergency Department, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Laurent Gerbaud
- Clermont-Ferrand Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
- Department of Public Health, Biostatistics Unit, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Emmanuel Coudeyre
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France
- Clermont-Ferrand Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
- INRA, Unity of Human Nutrition (UNH, UMR 1019), CRNH Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Griffin A, Jagnoor J, Arora M, Cameron ID, Kifley A, Sterling M, Kenardy J, Rebbeck T. Evidence-based care in high- and low-risk groups following whiplash injury: a multi-centre inception cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19:806. [PMID: 31694622 PMCID: PMC6836463 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4623-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2018] [Accepted: 10/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies aimed at improving the provision of evidence-based care (EBC) for the management of acute whiplash injuries have been largely successful. However, whether EBC is broadly provided and whether delivery of EBC varies based on risk of non-recovery, is uncertain. Receiving EBC should improve recovery, though this relationship has yet to be established. Further, mitigating the effect of EBC is the relationship with the practitioner, a phenomenon poorly understood in WAD. This study aimed to determine the proportion of individuals with whiplash, at differing baseline risk levels, receiving EBC. This study also aimed to determine whether receiving EBC and the therapeutic relationship were associated with recovery at 3 months post injury. METHODS Participants with acute whiplash were recruited from public hospital emergency departments, private physiotherapy practices, and State Insurance Regulatory Authority (SIRA) databases. Participants completed questionnaires at baseline (demographics, risk of non-recovery) and 3-months (treatment received, risk identification, therapeutic relationship) post injury. Primary health care providers (HCPs) treating these participants also completed questionnaires at 3-months. Recovery was defined as neck disability index ≤4/50 and global perceived effect of ≥4/5. RESULTS Two-hundred and twenty-eight people with acute whiplash, and 53 primary care practitioners were recruited. The majority of the cohort reported receiving EBC, with correct application of the Canadian C-spine rule (74%), and provision of active treatments (e.g. 89% receiving advice) high. Non-recommended (passive) treatments were also received by a large proportion of the cohort (e.g. 50% receiving massage). The therapeutic relationship was associated with higher odds of recovery, which was potentially clinically significant (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.18-1.62). EBC was not significantly associated with recovery. CONCLUSIONS Guideline-based knowledge and practice has largely been retained from previous implementation strategies. However, recommendations for routine risk identification and tailored management, and reduction in the provision of passive treatment have not. The therapeutic relationship was identified as one of several important predictors of recovery, suggesting that clinicians must develop rapport and understanding with their patients to improve the likelihood of recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Griffin
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, 75 East St, Lidcombe, NSW Australia
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, The University of Sydney, Kolling Institute, St Leonards, NSW Australia
| | - Jagnoor Jagnoor
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, The University of Sydney, Kolling Institute, St Leonards, NSW Australia
- The George Institute for Global Health, The University of Sydney, Level 5, 1 King St, Newtown, NSW Australia
| | - Mohit Arora
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, The University of Sydney, Kolling Institute, St Leonards, NSW Australia
| | - Ian D. Cameron
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, The University of Sydney, Kolling Institute, St Leonards, NSW Australia
| | - Annette Kifley
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, The University of Sydney, Kolling Institute, St Leonards, NSW Australia
| | - Michele Sterling
- NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Road Traffic Injury, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD Australia
- Recover Injury Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Level 7, UQ Oral Health Centre, Herston, QLD Australia
| | - Justin Kenardy
- Recover Injury Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Level 7, UQ Oral Health Centre, Herston, QLD Australia
| | - Trudy Rebbeck
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, 75 East St, Lidcombe, NSW Australia
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, The University of Sydney, Kolling Institute, St Leonards, NSW Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Trujillo-Martín MM, Ramallo-Fariña Y, Del Pino-Sedeño T, Rúa-Figueroa Í, Trujillo-Martín E, Vallejo-Torres L, Imaz-Iglesia I, Sánchez-de-Madariaga R, de Pascual-Medina AM, Serrano-Aguilar P. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention to implement a clinical practice guideline for systemic lupus erythematosus: protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19:783. [PMID: 31675957 PMCID: PMC6824022 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4589-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Accepted: 10/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease with significant potential morbidity and mortality. Substantial gaps have been documented between the development and dissemination of clinical practice guidelines (CPG) and their implementation in practice. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a multi-component knowledge transfer intervention to implement a CPG for the management of SLE (CPG-SLE). Methods The study is an open, multicentre, controlled trial with random allocation by clusters to intervention or control. Clusters are four public university hospitals of the Canary Islands Health Service where rheumatologists are invited to participate. Patients diagnosed with SLE at least one year prior to recruitment are selected. Rheumatologists in intervention group receive a short educational group programme to both update their knowledge about SLE management according to CPG-SLE recommendations and to acquire knowledge and training on use of the patient-centred approach, a decision support tool embedded in the electronic clinical record and a quarterly feedback report containing information on management of SLE patients. Primary endpoint is change in self-perceived disease activity. Secondary endpoints are adherence of professionals to CPG-SLE recommendations, health-related quality of life, patient perception of their participation in decision making, attitudes of professionals towards shared decision making, knowledge of professionals about SLE and use of healthcare resources. Calculated sample size is 412 patients. Data will be collected from questionnaires and clinical records. Length of follow-up will be 18 months. Multilevel mixed models with repeated time measurements will be used to analyze changes in outcomes over time. Cost-effectiveness, from both social and healthcare services perspectives, will be analyzed by measuring effectiveness in terms of quality-adjusted life years gained. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses are planned. Discussion Impact of CPGs in clinical practice could be improved by applying proven value interventions to implement them. The results of this ongoing trial are expected to generate important scientifically valid and reproducible information not only on clinical effectiveness but also on cost-effectiveness of a multi-component intervention for implementation of a CPG based on communication technologies for chronic patients in the hospital setting. Trial registration ClinicalTrial.gov NCT03537638. Registered on 25 May 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María M Trujillo-Martín
- Fundación Canaria Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Canarias (FIISC), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Tenerife, Spain. .,Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain. .,Red Española de Agencias de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias (RedETS), Madrid, Spain. .,Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas de Canarias (CIBICAN), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.
| | - Yolanda Ramallo-Fariña
- Fundación Canaria Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Canarias (FIISC), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Tenerife, Spain.,Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain.,Red Española de Agencias de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias (RedETS), Madrid, Spain.,Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas de Canarias (CIBICAN), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - Tasmania Del Pino-Sedeño
- Fundación Canaria Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Canarias (FIISC), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Tenerife, Spain.,Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Íñigo Rúa-Figueroa
- Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrin, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | | | - Laura Vallejo-Torres
- Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos en Economía y Gestión, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - Iñaki Imaz-Iglesia
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain.,Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias del Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ricardo Sánchez-de-Madariaga
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain.,Unidad de Investigación en Telemedicina y e-Salud, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana M de Pascual-Medina
- Servicio de Evaluación del Servicio Canario de la Salud (SESCS), Servicio Canario de la Salud, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - Pedro Serrano-Aguilar
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain.,Red Española de Agencias de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias (RedETS), Madrid, Spain.,Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas de Canarias (CIBICAN), Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.,Servicio de Evaluación del Servicio Canario de la Salud (SESCS), Servicio Canario de la Salud, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Strunce J, Spoonemore S, Golding J, Randall T, Krok M, Lee S, Bordt D, Walker-Ferrell W, Cordel D. Physical rehabilitation therapists' perspective of the opioid crisis with evidence-based recommendations. Pain Manag 2019; 9:483-495. [PMID: 31452447 DOI: 10.2217/pmt-2019-0018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
In 2017, the Secretary of Health and Human Services and Office of the Surgeon General declared the opioid crisis of our nation to be a public health emergency. In response to the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Health and Office of the Surgeon General's 'Call to Action', the Therapist category of the US Public Health Service commissioned a nine-member task force consisting of pain science subject matter experts to study the Therapists' role in effectively reducing chronic pain and opioid abuse. This article addresses the opioid epidemic, how patients with chronic pain have been managed inappropriately, and five key, evidence-based recommendations from this task force.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Strunce
- Rehabilitation Department, Four Corners Regional Health Center, Red Mesa, AZ 86514, USA
| | - Stephen Spoonemore
- Rehabilitation Department, Physical Therapy & Exercise Southcentral Foundation, Anchorage, AK 99508, USA
| | - Joseph Golding
- Rehabilitation Department, Parker Indian Health Center, Parker, AZ 85344, USA
| | - Tarri Randall
- Rehabilitation Department, Whiteriver Indian Hospital, Whiteriver, AZ 85941, USA
| | - Michael Krok
- Rehabilitation Department, Womack Army Medical Center, Fort Bragg, NC 28310, USA
| | - Steven Lee
- Rehabilitation Department, Valley Native Primary Care Center, Wasilla, AK 99654, USA
| | - Daniel Bordt
- Rehabilitation Department, Federal Medical Center Rochester, Rochester, MN 55904, USA
| | - Wendy Walker-Ferrell
- Rehabilitation Department, Chinle Comprehensive Health Care Facility, Chinle, AZ 86503, USA
| | - Douglas Cordel
- Rehabilitation Department, Four Corners Regional Health Center, Red Mesa, AZ 86514, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bandong AN, Mackey M, Leaver A, Ingram R, Sterling M, Ritchie C, Kelly J, Rebbeck T. An Interactive Website for Whiplash Management (My Whiplash Navigator): Process Evaluation of Design and Implementation. JMIR Form Res 2019; 3:e12216. [PMID: 31452515 PMCID: PMC6732967 DOI: 10.2196/12216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2018] [Revised: 05/02/2019] [Accepted: 05/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Whiplash is a health and economic burden worldwide. Contributing to this burden is poor guideline adherence and variable management by health care professionals (HCPs). Web-based tools that facilitate clinical pathways of care are an innovative solution to improve management. Objective The study aimed to develop, implement, and evaluate a Web-based tool to support whiplash management following a robust process. Methods This study followed the first 3 processes of a research translation framework (idea generation, feasibility, and efficacy) to inform the development, implementation, and evaluation of a website that supports HCPs in whiplash management. Development followed the idea generation and feasibility processes to inform the content, design, features, and functionality of the website. This involved stakeholder (eg, industry partners, website developers, and HCPs) consultations through face-to-face meetings, surveys, and focus group discussions. Implementation followed the feasibility process to determine the practicality of the website for clinical use and the most effective strategy to promote wider uptake. Implementation strategies included classroom education, educational meetings, educational outreach, reminders, and direct phone contact. The analysis of website use and practicality of implementation involved collection of website metrics. Evaluation followed the feasibility and efficacy processes to investigate the acceptability and extent to which the website assisted HCPs in gaining knowledge about whiplash management. Surveys were conducted among student, primary, and specialist HCPs to explore ease of access, use, and satisfaction with the website, as well as self-rated improvements in knowledge of risk assessment, management, and communication between HCPs. Website logs of specialist management decisions (eg, shared care, specialist care, and referred care) were also obtained to determine actual practice. Results The development process delivered an interactive, user-friendly, and acceptable website, My Whiplash Navigator, tailored to the needs of HCPs. A total of 260 registrations were recorded from June 2016 to March 2018, including 175 student, 65 primary, and 20 specialist HCPs. The most effective implementation strategies were classroom education for students (81% uptake, 175/215) and educational meetings for primary HCPs (43% uptake, 47/110). Popular pages visited included advice and exercises and risk assessment. Most HCPs agreed that their knowledge about risk management (79/97, 81%) and exercises (85/97, 88%) improved. The specialists’ most common management decision was shared care, an improvement from a previous cohort. Areas to improve were navigation and access to outcome measures. Conclusions A robust process resulted in an innovative, interactive, user-friendly, and acceptable website, the My Whiplash Navigator. Implementation with HCPs was best achieved through classroom education and educational meetings. Evaluation of the website showed improved knowledge and practice to be more consistent with a risk-based clinical care pathway for whiplash. The positive results provide sufficient evidence to scale implementation nationally and involve other target markets such as people with whiplash, insurers, and insurance regulators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aila Nica Bandong
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Physical Therapy, College of Allied Medical Professions, The University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines
| | - Martin Mackey
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Andrew Leaver
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rodney Ingram
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Michele Sterling
- Recover Injury Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,Centre of Research Excellence in Road Traffic Injury Recovery, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Carrie Ritchie
- Recover Injury Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,Centre of Research Excellence in Road Traffic Injury Recovery, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Joan Kelly
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Trudy Rebbeck
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Kolling Institute, John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Maric J, Childs J, Esterman A. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of clinical practice guidelines in sonography. SONOGRAPHY 2019. [DOI: 10.1002/sono.12179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jovana Maric
- School of Health SciencesUniversity of South Australia Adelaide South Australia Australia
| | - Jessie Childs
- SANSOM Research InstituteUniversity of South Australia Adelaide South Australia Australia
| | - Adrian Esterman
- UniSA Cancer Research InstituteUniversity of South Australia Adelaide South Australia Australia
- Australian Institute of Tropical Health and MedicineJames Cook University Townsville Queensland Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bandong AN, Leaver A, Mackey M, Ingram R, Shearman S, Chan C, Cameron ID, Moloney N, Mitchell R, Doyle E, Leyten E, Rebbeck T. Adoption and use of guidelines for whiplash: an audit of insurer and health professional practice in New South Wales, Australia. BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18:622. [PMID: 30089495 PMCID: PMC6083615 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3439-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2018] [Accepted: 08/01/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Australia, the New South Wales (NSW) State Insurance Regulatory Authority has been continuously developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines to address the health and economic burden from whiplash associated disorders (WAD). Despite this, it is uncertain the extent to which the guidelines are followed. This study aimed to determine insurer and health professional compliance with recommendations of the 2014 NSW clinical practice guidelines for the management of acute WAD; and explore factors related to adherence. METHODS This was an observational study involving an audit of 288 randomly-selected claimant files from 4 insurance providers in NSW, Australia between March and October 2016. Data extracted included demographic, claim and injury details, use of health services, and insurer and health professional practices related to the guidelines. Analyses involved descriptive statistics and correlation analysis. RESULTS Median time for general practitioner medical consultation was 4 days post-injury and 25 days for physical treatment (e.g. physiotherapy). Rates of x-ray investigations were low (21.5%) and most patients (90%) were given active treatments in line with the guideline recommendations. The frequency of other practices recommended by the guidelines suggested lower guideline adherence in some areas such as; using the Quebec Task Force classification (19.9%); not using specialised imaging for WAD grades I and II (e.g. MRI, 45.8%); not using routine passive treatments (e.g. manual therapy, 94.0%); and assessing risk of non-recovery using relevant prognostic tools (e.g. Neck Disability Index, 12.8%). Over half of the claimants (59.0%) were referred to other professionals at 9-12 weeks post-injury, among which 31.2% were to psychologists and 68.8% to specialists (surgical specialists, 43.6%; WAD specialists, 20.5%). Legal representation and lodgment of full claim were associated with increased number of medical visits and imaging (ρ 0.23 to 0.3; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION There is evidence of positive uptake of some guideline recommendations by insurers and health professionals; however, there are practices that are not compliant and might lead to poor health outcomes and greater treatment cost. Organisational, regulatory and professional implementation strategies may be considered to change practice, improve scheme performance and ultimately improve outcomes for people with WAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aila Nica Bandong
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, 75 East Street, Sydney, Australia
- College of Allied Medical Professions, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines
- Musculoskeletal Lab/Refshauge Lab (S218), Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney – Cumberland Campus, 75 East Street, Lidcombe, NSW 2141 Australia
| | - Andrew Leaver
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, 75 East Street, Sydney, Australia
| | - Martin Mackey
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, 75 East Street, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rodney Ingram
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, 75 East Street, Sydney, Australia
| | - Samantha Shearman
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, 75 East Street, Sydney, Australia
| | - Christen Chan
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, 75 East Street, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ian D Cameron
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Niamh Moloney
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rebecca Mitchell
- Macquarie University, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Sydney, Australia
| | - Eoin Doyle
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Emma Leyten
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Trudy Rebbeck
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, 75 East Street, Sydney, Australia
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hay E, Dziedzic K, Foster N, Peat G, van der Windt D, Bartlam B, Blagojevic-Bucknall M, Edwards J, Healey E, Holden M, Hughes R, Jinks C, Jordan K, Jowett S, Lewis M, Mallen C, Morden A, Nicholls E, Ong BN, Porcheret M, Wulff J, Kigozi J, Oppong R, Paskins Z, Croft P. Optimal primary care management of clinical osteoarthritis and joint pain in older people: a mixed-methods programme of systematic reviews, observational and qualitative studies, and randomised controlled trials. PROGRAMME GRANTS FOR APPLIED RESEARCH 2018. [DOI: 10.3310/pgfar06040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BackgroundOsteoarthritis (OA) is the most common long-term condition managed in UK general practice. However, care is suboptimal despite evidence that primary care and community-based interventions can reduce OA pain and disability.ObjectivesThe overall aim was to improve primary care management of OA and the health of patients with OA. Four parallel linked workstreams aimed to (1) develop a health economic decision model for estimating the potential for cost-effective delivery of primary care OA interventions to improve population health, (2) develop and evaluate new health-care models for delivery of core treatments and support for self-management among primary care consulters with OA, and to investigate prioritisation and implementation of OA care among the public, patients, doctors, health-care professionals and NHS trusts, (3) determine the effectiveness of strategies to optimise specific components of core OA treatment using the example of exercise and (4) investigate the effect of interventions to tackle barriers to core OA treatment, using the example of comorbid anxiety and depression in persons with OA.Data sourcesThe North Staffordshire Osteoarthritis Project database, held by Keele University, was the source of data for secondary analyses in workstream 1.MethodsWorkstream 1 used meta-analysis and synthesis of published evidence about effectiveness of primary care treatments, combined with secondary analysis of existing longitudinal population-based cohort data, to identify predictors of poor long-term outcome (prognostic factors) and design a health economic decision model to estimate cost-effectiveness of different hypothetical strategies for implementing optimal primary care for patients with OA. Workstream 2 used mixed methods to (1) develop and test a ‘model OA consultation’ for primary care health-care professionals (qualitative interviews, consensus, training and evaluation) and (2) evaluate the combined effect of a computerised ‘pop-up’ guideline for general practitioners (GPs) in the consultation and implementing the model OA consultation on practice and patient outcomes (parallel group intervention study). Workstream 3 developed and investigated in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) how to optimise the effect of exercise in persons with knee OA by tailoring it to the individual and improving adherence. Workstream 4 developed and investigated in a cluster RCT the extent to which screening patients for comorbid anxiety and depression can improve OA outcomes. Public and patient involvement included proposal development, project steering and analysis. An OA forum involved public, patient, health professional, social care and researcher representatives to debate the results and formulate proposals for wider implementation and dissemination.ResultsThis programme provides evidence (1) that economic modelling can be used in OA to extrapolate findings of cost-effectiveness beyond the short-term outcomes of clinical trials, (2) about ways of implementing support for self-management and models of optimal primary care informed by National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommendations, including the beneficial effects of training in a model OA consultation on GP behaviour and of pop-up screens in GP consultations on the quality of prescribing, (3) against adding enhanced interventions to current effective physiotherapy-led exercise for knee OA and (4) against screening for anxiety and depression in patients with musculoskeletal pain as an addition to current best practice for OA.ConclusionsImplementation of evidence-based care for patients with OA is feasible in general practice and has an immediate impact on improving the quality of care delivered to patients. However, improved levels of quality of care, changes to current best practice physiotherapy and successful introduction of psychological screening, as achieved by this programme, did not substantially reduce patients’ pain and disability. This poses important challenges for clinical practice and OA research.LimitationsThe key limitation in this work is the lack of improvement in patient-reported pain and disability despite clear evidence of enhanced delivery of evidence-based care.Future work recommendations(1) New thinking and research is needed into the achievable and desirable long-term goals of care for people with OA, (2) continuing investigation into the resources needed to properly implement clinical guidelines for management of OA as a long-term condition, such as regular monitoring to maintain exercise and physical activity and (3) new research to identify subgroups of patients with OA as a basis for stratified primary care including (i) those with good prognosis who can self-manage with minimal investigation or specialist treatment, (ii) those who will respond to, and benefit from, specific interventions in primary care, such as physiotherapy-led exercise, and (iii) develop research into effective identification and treatment of clinically important anxiety and depression in patients with OA and into the effects of pain management on psychological outcomes in patients with OA.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN06984617, ISRCTN93634563 and ISRCTN40721988.FundingThis project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research Programme and will be published in full inProgramme Grants for Applied Research Programme; Vol. 6, No. 4. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elaine Hay
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Krysia Dziedzic
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Nadine Foster
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - George Peat
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Danielle van der Windt
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Bernadette Bartlam
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Milisa Blagojevic-Bucknall
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - John Edwards
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Emma Healey
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Melanie Holden
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Rhian Hughes
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Clare Jinks
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Kelvin Jordan
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Sue Jowett
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
- Health Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Martyn Lewis
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Christian Mallen
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Andrew Morden
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Elaine Nicholls
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Bie Nio Ong
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Mark Porcheret
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Jerome Wulff
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Jesse Kigozi
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
- Health Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Raymond Oppong
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
- Health Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Zoe Paskins
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Peter Croft
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lady SD, Haas M, Takagi R, Takaki L. A Preliminary Study of Chiropractors’ Beliefs About Biomedical and Biopsychosocial Pain: A Survey of University of Western States Alumni. J Chiropr Med 2018; 17:16-21. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2017.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2016] [Revised: 09/09/2017] [Accepted: 09/13/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
|
25
|
Oostendorp RA, Elvers H, van Trijffel E, Rutten GM, Scholten-Peeters GG, Heijmans M, Hendriks E, Mikolajewska E, De Kooning M, Laekeman M, Nijs J, Roussel N, Samwel H. Has the quality of physiotherapy care in patients with Whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) improved over time? A retrospective study using routinely collected data and quality indicators. Patient Prefer Adherence 2018; 12:2291-2308. [PMID: 30519001 PMCID: PMC6233472 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s179808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop valid quality indicators (QIs) for physiotherapy care based on best available evidence, and to use these QIs to explore trends in the quality of physiotherapy care of patients with Whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) using guideline-based routinely collected data (RCD) gathered between 1996 and 2011. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study consisted of two phases: 1) development of QIs and 2) analysis of patient records. A set of QIs was developed based on recommendations in the scientific literature and the Dutch Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) "Physiotherapy Management and WAD". QIs were expressed as percentages, allowing target performance levels to be defined (≥80% or ≤30% depending on whether desired performance required a high or low score on a QI). We then analyzed WAD patient data (N = 810) collected over a period of 16 years in two physiotherapy practices, separating patients into two groups defined as before (Group A 1996-2002; n = 353) and after (Group B 2003-2011; n = 457) implementation and transition to the Dutch CPG "Physiotherapy Management and WAD". RESULTS Using an iterative process and input from both experts and users, 28 QIs were developed and subsequently classified per step of the clinical reasoning process for physiotherapy care. Based on 16 years of RCD, we found that the clinical reasoning process differed significantly (P ≤ 0.05) between the groups, in favor of Group B. Twelve of the 25 indicators (48.0%) in Group A and 19 of 26 indicators (73.1%) in Group B met predetermined performance targets. The number of target indicators also differed significantly between groups, favoring Group B (P ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION A preliminary set of novel QIs was developed. Using RCD and these QIs, we conclude that physiotherapy care in our study setting improved over the period 1996-2011. Furthermore, the QIs met the performance targets set for the clinical reasoning process after the transition to the Dutch CPG "Physiotherapy Management and WAD".
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rob Ab Oostendorp
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands,
- Department of Manual Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium,
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Free University Brussels, Brussels, Belgium,
- Practice Physiotherapy and Manual Therapy, Heeswijk-Dinther, the Netherlands,
| | - Hans Elvers
- Department of Public Health and Research, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Methodological Health-Skilled Institute, Beuningen, the Netherlands
| | - Emiel van Trijffel
- SOMT University of Physiotherapy, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Free University Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Geert M Rutten
- Institute of Health Studies, Faculty of Health and Social Studies, HAN University of Applied Science, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Faculty of Science and Engineering, University College Venlo, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Gwendolyne Gm Scholten-Peeters
- Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioral and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marcel Heijmans
- Practice Physiotherapy and Manual Therapy, Heeswijk-Dinther, the Netherlands,
| | - Erik Hendriks
- Department of Epidemiology, Center of Evidence-Based Physiotherapy, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Practice Physiotherapy 'Klepperheide', Druten, the Netherlands
| | - Emilia Mikolajewska
- Department of Physiotherapy, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland
- Neurocognitive Laboratory, Centre for Modern Interdisciplinary Technologies, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland
| | - Margot De Kooning
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Free University Brussels, Brussels, Belgium,
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Free University Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marjan Laekeman
- Department of Nursing Sciences, Faculty of Health, University Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany
| | - Jo Nijs
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Free University Brussels, Brussels, Belgium,
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Free University Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Nathalie Roussel
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (MOVANT), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Han Samwel
- Department of Medical Psychology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Strategies to translate knowledge related to common musculoskeletal conditions into physiotherapy practice: a systematic review. Physiotherapy 2017; 104:1-8. [PMID: 28942899 DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2017.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2016] [Accepted: 05/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many physiotherapists underuse evidence-based practice guidelines or recommendations when treating patients with musculoskeletal disorders, yet synthesis of knowledge translation interventions used within the field of physiotherapy fails to offer clear conclusions to guide the implementation of clinical practice guidelines. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effectiveness of various knowledge translation interventions used to implement changes in the practice of current physiotherapists treating common musculoskeletal issues. DATA SOURCES A computerized literature search of MEDLINE, CINHAL and ProQuest of systematic reviews (from inception until May 2016) and primary research studies (from January 2010 until June 2016). STUDY SELECTION AND ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Eligibility criteria specified articles evaluating interventions for translating knowledge into physiotherapy practice. DATA EXTRACTION AND DATA SYNTHESIS Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts, reviewed full-text articles, performed data extraction, and performed quality assessment. Of a total of 13014 articles located and titles and abstracts screened, 34 studies met the inclusion criteria, including three overlapping publications, resulting in 31 individual studies. RESULTS Knowledge translation interventions appear to have resulted in a positive change in physiotherapist beliefs, attitudes, skills and guideline awareness. However, no consistent improvement in clinical practice, patient and economic outcomes were observed. LIMITATIONS The studies included had small sample sizes and low methodological quality. The heterogeneity of the studies was not conducive to pooling the data. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATION OF KEY FINDINGS The intensity and type of knowledge translation intervention seem to have an effect on practice change. More research targeting financial, organizational and regulatory knowledge translation interventions is needed.
Collapse
|
27
|
Elbers NA, Chase R, Craig A, Guy L, Harris IA, Middleton JW, Nicholas MK, Rebbeck T, Walsh J, Willcock S, Lockwood K, Cameron ID. Health care professionals' attitudes towards evidence-based medicine in the workers' compensation setting: a cohort study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2017; 17:64. [PMID: 28532470 PMCID: PMC5440905 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-017-0460-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2016] [Accepted: 05/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Problems may arise during the approval process of treatment after a compensable work injury, which include excess paperwork, delays in approving services, disputes, and allegations of over-servicing. This is perceived as undesirable for injured people, health care professionals and claims managers, and costly to the health care system, compensation system, workplaces and society. Introducing an Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) decision tool in the workers' compensation system could provide a partial solution, by reducing uncertainty about effective treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate attitudes of health care professionals (HCP) to the potential implementation of an EBM tool in the workers' compensation setting. METHODS The study has a mixed methods design. The quantitative study consisted of an online questionnaire asking about self-reported knowledge, attitudes and behaviour to EBM in general. The qualitative study consisted of interviews about an EBM tool being applied in the workers' compensation process. Participants were health care practitioners from different clinical specialties. They were recruited through the investigators' clinical networks and the workers' compensation government regulator's website. RESULTS Participants completing the questionnaire (n = 231) indicated they were knowledgeable about the evidence-base in their field, but perceived some difficulties when applying EBM. General practitioners reported having the greatest obstacles to applying EBM. Participants who were interviewed (n = 15) perceived that an EBM tool in the workers' compensation setting could potentially have some advantages, such as reducing inappropriate treatment, or over-servicing, and providing guidance for clinicians. However, participants expressed substantial concerns that the EBM tool would not adequately reflect the impact of psychosocial factors on recovery. They also highlighted a lack of timeliness in decision making and proper assessment, particularly in pain management. CONCLUSIONS Overall, HCP are supportive of EBM, but have strong concerns about implementation of EBM based decision making in the workers' compensation setting. The participants felt that an EBM tool should not be applied rigidly and should take into account clinical judgement and patient variability and preferences. In general, the treatment approval process in the workers' compensation insurance system is a sensitive area, in which the interaction between HCP and claims managers can be improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nieke A. Elbers
- Sydney Medical School Northern, University of Sydney; Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, Australia
| | - Robin Chase
- Tyrrell Consulting, Adelaide, South Australia Australia
| | - Ashley Craig
- Sydney Medical School Northern, University of Sydney; Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, Australia
| | - Lyn Guy
- School of Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
| | - Ian A. Harris
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - James W. Middleton
- Sydney Medical School Northern, University of Sydney; Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, Australia
| | - Michael K. Nicholas
- Sydney Medical School Northern, University of Sydney; Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, Australia
| | - Trudy Rebbeck
- Sydney Medical School Northern, University of Sydney; Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, Australia
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - John Walsh
- Sydney Medical School Northern, University of Sydney; Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, Australia
| | - Simon Willcock
- Macquarie University Hospital and Health Sciences Centre, Sydney, Australia
| | - Keri Lockwood
- Sydney Medical School Northern, University of Sydney; Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, Australia
| | - Ian D Cameron
- Sydney Medical School Northern, University of Sydney; Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Holden MA, Whittle R, Healey EL, Hill S, Mullis R, Roddy E, Sowden G, Tooth S, Foster NE. Content and Evaluation of the Benefits of Effective Exercise for Older Adults With Knee Pain Trial Physiotherapist Training Program. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2016; 98:866-873. [PMID: 27894731 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2016] [Accepted: 10/08/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore whether participating in the Benefits of Effective Exercise for knee Pain (BEEP) trial training program increased physiotherapists' self-confidence and changed their intended clinical behavior regarding exercise for knee pain in older adults. DESIGN Before/after training program evaluation. Physiotherapists were asked to complete a questionnaire before the BEEP trial training program, immediately after, and 12 to 18 months later (postintervention delivery in the BEEP trial). The questionnaire included a case vignette and associated clinical management questions. Questionnaire responses were compared over time and between physiotherapists trained to deliver each intervention within the BEEP trial. SETTING Primary care. PARTICIPANTS Physiotherapists (N=53) who completed the BEEP trial training program. INTERVENTIONS Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Self-confidence in the diagnosis and management of knee pain in older adults; and intended clinical behavior measured by a case vignette and associated clinical management questions. RESULTS Fifty-two physiotherapists (98%) returned the pretraining questionnaire, and 44 (85%) and 39 (74%) returned the posttraining and postintervention questionnaires, respectively. Posttraining, self-confidence in managing older adults with knee pain increased, and intended clinical behavior regarding exercise for knee pain in older adults appeared more in line with clinical guidelines. However, not all positive changes were maintained in the longer-term. CONCLUSIONS Participating in the BEEP trial training program increased physiotherapists' self-confidence and changed their intended clinical behavior regarding exercise for knee pain, but by 12 to 18 months later, some of these positive changes were lost. This suggests that brief training programs are useful, but additional strategies are likely needed to successfully maintain changes in clinical behavior over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie A Holden
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire.
| | - Rebecca Whittle
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire
| | - Emma L Healey
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire
| | - Susan Hill
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire
| | - Ricky Mullis
- The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
| | - Edward Roddy
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire; Staffordshire Rheumatology Centre, Haywood Hospital, Burslem, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom
| | - Gail Sowden
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire; Staffordshire Rheumatology Centre, Haywood Hospital, Burslem, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom
| | - Stephanie Tooth
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire
| | - Nadine E Foster
- Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bussières AE, Stewart G, Al-Zoubi F, Decina P, Descarreaux M, Hayden J, Hendrickson B, Hincapié C, Pagé I, Passmore S, Srbely J, Stupar M, Weisberg J, Ornelas J. The Treatment of Neck Pain–Associated Disorders and Whiplash-Associated Disorders: A Clinical Practice Guideline. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2016; 39:523-564.e27. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2016] [Revised: 07/14/2016] [Accepted: 08/10/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
30
|
Suman A, Dikkers MF, Schaafsma FG, van Tulder MW, Anema JR. Effectiveness of multifaceted implementation strategies for the implementation of back and neck pain guidelines in health care: a systematic review. Implement Sci 2016; 11:126. [PMID: 27647000 PMCID: PMC5029102 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-016-0482-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2016] [Accepted: 08/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For the optimal use of clinical guidelines in daily practice, mere distribution of guidelines and materials is not enough, and active implementation is needed. This review investigated the effectiveness of multifaceted implementation strategies compared to minimal, single, or no implementation strategy for the implementation of non-specific low back and/or neck pain guidelines in health care. METHODS The following electronic databases were searched from inception to June 1, 2015: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo, the Cochrane Library, and CINAHL. The search strategy was restricted to low back pain, neck pain, and implementation research. Studies were included if their design was a randomized controlled trial, reporting on patients (age ≥18 years) with non-specific low back pain or neck pain (with or without radiating pain). Trials were eligible if they reported patient outcomes, measures of healthcare professional behaviour, and/or outcomes on healthcare level. The primary outcome was professional behaviour. Guidelines that were evaluated in the studies had to be implemented in a healthcare setting. No language restrictions were applied, and studies had to be published full-text in peer-reviewed journals, thus excluding abstract only publications, conference abstracts, and dissertation articles. Two researchers independently screened titles and abstract, extracted data from included studies, and performed risk of bias assessments. RESULTS After removal of duplicates, the search resulted in 4750 abstracts to be screened. Of 43 full-text articles assessed for eligibility, 12 were included in this review, reporting on 9 individual studies, and separate cost-effectiveness analyses of 3 included studies. Implementation strategies varied between studies. Meta-analyses did not reveal any differences in effect between multifaceted strategies and controls. CONCLUSION This review showed that multifaceted strategies for the implementation of neck and/or back pain guidelines in health care do not significantly improve professional behaviour outcomes. No effects on patient outcomes or cost of care could be found. More research is necessary to determine whether multifaceted implementation strategies are conducted as planned and whether these strategies are effective in changing professional behaviour and thereby clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnela Suman
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, VU University medical centre and the EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, PO Box 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marije F Dikkers
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederieke G Schaafsma
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, VU University medical centre and the EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, PO Box 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Research Centre for Insurance Medicine, Collaboration between AMC-UMCG-UWV-VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Maurits W van Tulder
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes R Anema
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, VU University medical centre and the EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, PO Box 7057, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Research Centre for Insurance Medicine, Collaboration between AMC-UMCG-UWV-VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Bussières AE, Al Zoubi F, Stuber K, French SD, Boruff J, Corrigan J, Thomas A. Evidence-based practice, research utilization, and knowledge translation in chiropractic: a scoping review. Altern Ther Health Med 2016; 16:216. [PMID: 27412625 PMCID: PMC4944433 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-016-1175-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2015] [Accepted: 06/16/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Background Evidence-based practice (EBP) gaps are widespread across health disciplines. Understanding factors supporting the uptake of evidence can inform the design of strategies to narrow these EBP gaps. Although research utilization (RU) and the factors associated with EBP have been reported in several health disciplines, to date this area has not been reviewed comprehensively in the chiropractic profession. The purpose of this review was to report on the current state of knowledge on EBP, RU, and knowledge translation (KT) in chiropractic. Methods A scoping review using the Arksey and O’Malley framework was used to systematically select and summarize existing literature. Searches were conducted using a combination of keywords and MeSH terms from the earliest date available in each database to May 2015. Quantitative and thematic analyses of the selected literature were conducted. Results Nearly 85 % (56/67) of the included studies were conducted in Canada, USA, UK or Australia. Thematic analysis for the three categories (EBP, RU, KT) revealed two themes related to EBP (attitudes and beliefs of chiropractors; implementation of EBP), three related to RU (guideline adherence; frequency and sources of information accessed; and perceived value of websites and search engines), and three related to KT (knowledge practice gaps; barriers and facilitators to knowledge use; and selection, tailoring, and implementation of interventions). EBP gaps were noted in the areas of assessment of activity limitation, determination of psychosocial factors influencing pain, general health indicators, establishing a prognosis, and exercise prescription. While most practitioners believed EBP and research to be important and a few studies suggested that traditional and online educational strategies could improve patient care, use of EBP and guideline adherence varied widely. Conclusion Findings suggest that the majority of chiropractors hold favourable attitudes and beliefs toward EBP. However, much remains to be done for chiropractors to routinely apply evidence into clinical practice. Educational strategies aimed at practicing chiropractors can lead to more EBP and improved patient care. The chiropractic profession requires more robust dissemination and implementation research to improve guideline adherence and patient health outcomes. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12906-016-1175-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
32
|
Fischer F, Lange K, Klose K, Greiner W, Kraemer A. Barriers and Strategies in Guideline Implementation-A Scoping Review. Healthcare (Basel) 2016; 4:healthcare4030036. [PMID: 27417624 PMCID: PMC5041037 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare4030036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 479] [Impact Index Per Article: 59.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2016] [Revised: 06/20/2016] [Accepted: 06/24/2016] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Research indicates that clinical guidelines are often not applied. The success of their implementation depends on the consideration of a variety of barriers and the use of adequate strategies to overcome them. Therefore, this scoping review aims to describe and categorize the most important barriers to guideline implementation. Furthermore, it provides an overview of different kinds of suitable strategies that are tailored to overcome these barriers. The search algorithm led to the identification of 1659 articles in PubMed. Overall, 69 articles were included in the data synthesis. The content of these articles was analysed by using a qualitative synthesis approach, to extract the most important information on barriers and strategies. The barriers to guideline implementation can be differentiated into personal factors, guideline-related factors, and external factors. The scoping review revealed the following aspects as central elements of successful strategies for guideline implementation: dissemination, education and training, social interaction, decision support systems and standing orders. Available evidence indicates that a structured implementation can improve adherence to guidelines. Therefore, the barriers to guideline implementation and adherence need to be analysed in advance so that strategies that are tailored to the specific setting and target groups can be developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Fischer
- Department of Public Health Medicine, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.
| | - Kerstin Lange
- Department of Public Health Medicine, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.
| | - Kristina Klose
- Department of Health Care Management, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.
| | - Wolfgang Greiner
- Department of Health Care Management, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.
| | - Alexander Kraemer
- Department of Public Health Medicine, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Keating JL, McKenzie JE, O'Connor DA, French S, Walker BF, Charity M, Page MJ, Green SE. Providing services for acute low-back pain: A survey of Australian physiotherapists. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016; 22:145-52. [DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2015.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2015] [Revised: 11/04/2015] [Accepted: 11/29/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
34
|
Rebbeck T, Macedo L, Paul P, Trevena L, Cameron ID. General practitioners' knowledge of whiplash guidelines improved with online education. AUST HEALTH REV 2014; 37:688-94. [PMID: 24160566 DOI: 10.1071/ah13057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2013] [Accepted: 08/02/2013] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of an online education program used to implement the Australian (New South Wales) whiplash guidelines with general practitioners (GP). The secondary aim was to identify factors associated with learning. METHODS An online educational and evaluation activity was developed to reflect the key messages for GP from the Australian whiplash guidelines. The educational activity was hosted on the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners' website (www.gplearning.com.au) for a period of 3 years. Participants were recruited through advertisement and media releases. Participants completed a baseline evaluation of their knowledge, participated in the interactive educational activity and completed a post-knowledge questionnaire. The primary outcome was change in professional knowledge, predictors of learning were computed using linear regression. RESULTS Two hundred and fifteen GP participated. Knowledge significantly improved between baseline and post-knowledge questionnaire scores (P < 0.00001). A total of 57.2% of participants improved their knowledge by more than 20%, indicating a large effect. Low baseline knowledge predicted learning, accounting for 71% of the variance. CONCLUSIONS Online education of GP significantly improved their knowledge in relation to guidelines for whiplash. Those with low baseline knowledge improved their knowledge the most, suggesting that implementation strategies should be targeted at this group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Rebbeck
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Science, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, NSW 2141, Australia
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|