Differential regulation of somatostatin receptors 1 and 2 mRNA and protein expression by tamoxifen and estradiol in breast cancer cells

Somatostatin and Somatostatin Receptors in Tumour Biology

Somatostatin (SST), a growth hormone inhibitory peptide, is expressed in endocrine and non-endocrine tissues, immune cells and the central nervous system (CNS). Post-release from secretory or immune cells, the first most appreciated role that SST exhibits is the antiproliferative effect in target tissue that served as a potential therapeutic intervention in various tumours of different origins. The SST-mediated in vivo and/or in vitro antiproliferative effect in the tumour is considered direct via activation of five different somatostatin receptor subtypes (SSTR1-5), which are well expressed in most tumours and often more than one receptor in a single cell. Second, the indirect effect is associated with the regulation of growth factors. SSTR subtypes are crucial in tumour diagnosis and prognosis. In this review, with the recent development of new SST analogues and receptor-specific agonists with emerging functional consequences of signaling pathways are promising therapeutic avenues in tumours of different origins that are discussed.

Combined anti-tumor efficacy of somatostatin fusion protein and vaccinia virus on tumor cells with high expression of somatostatin receptors

Somatostatin, a growth hormone-release inhibiting peptide, exerts antiproliferative and antiangiogenic effects on tumor cells. However, the short half-life of somatostatin limits its application in human therapy, and long-acting somatostatin fusion protein is also limited by its severe terminal degradation. Therefore, oncolytic virus delivery system was introduced to express somatostatin fusion protein and the anti-tumor effects of both somatostatin and oncolytic virus were combined to destroy tumor tissues. Here, a vaccinia VG9/(SST-14)₂-HSA recombinant was constructed by replacing somatostatin fusion gene into TK locus of attenuated VG9 strain via homologous recombination. Results showed that vaccinia VG9/(SST-14)₂-HSA possessed a combined anti-tumor effect on sstr-positive tumor cells in vitro. In the tumor burden models, BALB/c mice with complete immunity are most suitable for evaluating tumor regression and immune activation. Complete tumor regression was observed in 3 out of 10 mice treated with vaccinia VG9/TK⁻ or VG9/(SST-14)₂-HSA, and the survival of all mice in both groups was significantly prolonged. Besides, vaccinia VG9/(SST-14)₂-HSA is more effective in prolonging survival than VG9/TK⁻. Vaccinia VG9/(SST-14)₂-HSA exerts a combined anti-tumor efficacy including the oncolytic ability provided by the virus and the anti-tumor effect contributed by (SST-14)₂-HSA, which is expected to become a potent therapeutic agent for cancer treatment.

Identification of somatostatin receptors using labeled PEGylated octreotide, as an active internalization

Numerous normal and tumors cells are well-known to express the somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) on their surface which makes the receptor be useful for tumor scintigraphy. Thus, the identification of SSTRs is beneficial, especially SSTR₂. The somatostatin analog, Octreotide (OCT), was chosen as a ligand, as it is known to selectively bind to SSTR₂. Moreover, polyethylene glycol (PEG), 8armPEG, was used as a branched PEG to provide a low nonspecific cell binding and easily chemical modification. OCT and fluorescein (Flu) were conjugated to branched PEG using a water-soluble carbodiimide (EDC) and N-hydroxy succinimide (NHS) so as to activate its carboxylic acid group. 8armPEG-tagged Flu and OCT was characterized by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) to proof the conjugation of OCT to 8armPEG. Finally, cellular uptake was studied using pancreatic cancer cells with well-expressed somatostatin receptors using a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLMS) and fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS). GPC showed increases in molecular mass since it showed a difference in elution time of 8armPEG itself and 8armPEG labeled with Flu. CLMS and FACS showed high binding with the positive SSTR₂ cells expression and showed negative results with negative expressing SSTR₂. These bindings were decreased when the receptors were occupied with free OCT which confirms the specific binding to SSTR₂. Therefore, we formulated a novel model to easily identify SSTR₂ and other receptors which serves as a promising platform for identification of tumor cells overexpressing the SSTR₂, which would be a hopeful target for cancer therapy and tumor scintigraphy.

Expression and selective activation of somatostatin receptor subtypes induces cell cycle arrest in cancer cells

Somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) are G-protein-coupled plasma membrane receptors that have been determined to be expressed in normal and cancer tissues. Activation of SSTRs frequently results in inhibition of cell proliferation and therefore somatostatin analogues (SSAs) have been used in cancer treatment. However, the variable outcomes of SSA treatment were considered to be the consequences of loss-of-expression of SSTRs and/or subtype-specific effects. In the present study, the patterns of SSTR expression in 160 breast cancer tissues were investigated, and the mechanisms of SSTR activation and the influence on cell proliferation were further characterized. The expression levels of SSTR1-5 were determined using immunohistology. Hemagglutinin-SSTR1 and MYC-SSTR4 were transiently overexpressed in MDA-MB-435S cells, and the potential receptor dimerization was determined using immunofluorescence and co-immunoprecipitation. The influence of SSTR1 and SSTR4 expression/activation on cell proliferation was monitored using flow cytometry. The results demonstrated that all five SSTR subtypes were expressed at variable levels in tumor tissues, with the highest positive expression instance being determined for SSTR1 and SSTR4, with positive expression levels in 90.0 and 71.3% of tumor tissues, respectively. Immunofluorescence and co-immunoprecipitation revealed SSTR1/SSTR4 heterodimerization, which was increased in response to receptor activation using the subtype-specific SSA L-803087. The translocation of SSTR1/SSTR4 dimers into the cytoplasm upon receptor activation was also observed. Additionally, it was identified using flow cytometry that co-expression and activation of SSTR1 and SSTR4 in MDA-MB-435S cells resulted in a decreased proportion of S-phase cells. The results of the present study revealed that SSTR1 and SSTR4 are the most frequently expressed SSTR subtypes in breast cancer, and that the cell cycle arrest was mediated by SSTR1/SSTR4 dimerization/activation.

Somatostatin receptors as a new active targeting sites for nanoparticles

The delivery of nanoparticles through receptor-mediated cell interactions has nowadays a major attention in the area of drug targeting applications. This specific kind of targeting is mediated by localized receptors impeded into the target site with subsequent drugs internalization. Hence, this type of interaction would diminish side effects and enhance drug delivery efficacy to the target site. Somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) are one type of G protein-coupled receptors, which could be active targeted for various purposes. There are five SSTRs types (SSTR1-5) which are localized at various organs in the body and spread into different tissues. SSTRs could be considered as a promising target to various nanoparticles which is facilitated when nanoparticles are modified through specific ligand or coating to allow better binding. This review discusses the exploration of SSTRs for active targeting of nanoparticles with certain emphasize on their interaction at the cellular level.

Somatostatin Decorated Quantum Dots for Targeting of Somatostatin Receptors

Due to the unique optical properties like high brightness and narrow emission bands of Quantum dots, it is used as simple fluorescence materials in bio-imaging, immunoassays, microarrays, and other applications. To easy invistigate cell lines that overexpressed somtostatin receptors, somatostatin (SST) was conjugated with Quantum dots carrying PEG amine (Qdots-PEG-NH₂). The conjugation of SST to Qdots-PEG-NH₂ started with the thiolation of SST using Traut's reagent. Moreover, the Qdots-PEG-NH₂ were subsequently activated by 500-fold molar excess of sulfosuccinimidyl 4-(N-maleimidomethyl) cyclohexane-1-carboxylate (sulfo-SMCC) dissolved in phosphate buffer. The Qdots-PEG-NH₂-sulfo-SMCC was conjugated to the thiolated-SST to form Qdots-SST. The number of sulfhydryl groups can be controlled by the molar ratio of Traut´s reagent to SST. Thiolation was necessary for the conjugation of SST to Qdots-PEG-NH₂. This was achieved by reacting the SST with Traut's reagent in a 1:1 molar ratio. Ellman's reagent was used to determine the number of sulfhydryle groups. Furthermore, cellular uptake study on triple negative breast cancer cells (HCC-1806) showed that the numbers of Qdots-SST per cell were significantly higher compared to unmodified Qdots-PEG-NH₂ when quantified using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES). Moreover, the binding of Qdots-SST to cells can be suppressed by addition of free SST, indicating that the binding of Qdots-SST to cells is due to receptor-specific binding.

Review: Receptor Targeted Nuclear Imaging of Breast Cancer

Receptor targeted nuclear imaging directed against molecular markers overexpressed on breast cancer (BC) cells offers a sensitive and specific method for BC imaging. Currently, a few targets such as estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), somatostatin receptor (SSTR), and the gastrin releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) are being investigated for this purpose. Expression of these targets is BC subtype dependent and information that can be gained from lesion visualization is dependent on the target; ER-targeting radiotracers, e.g., can be used to monitor response to anti-estrogen treatment. Here we give an overview of the studies currently under investigation for receptor targeted nuclear imaging of BC. Main findings of imaging studies are summarized and (potential) purposes of lesion visualization by targeting these molecular markers are discussed. Since BC is a very heterogeneous disease and molecular target expression can vary per subtype, but also during disease progression or under influence of treatment, radiotracers for selected imaging purposes should be chosen carefully.

Gastrin-releasing Peptide Receptor Imaging in Breast Cancer Using the Receptor Antagonist (68)Ga-RM2 And PET

Introduction: The gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) is overexpressed in breast cancer. The present study evaluates GRPR imaging as a novel imaging modality in breast cancer by employing positron emission tomography (PET) and the GRPR antagonist ⁶⁸Ga-RM2.

Methods: Fifteen female patients with biopsy confirmed primary breast carcinoma (3 bilateral tumors; median clinical stage IIB) underwent ⁶⁸Ga-RM2-PET/CT for pretreatment staging. In vivo tumor uptake of ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 was correlated with estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptor expression, HER2/neu status and MIB-1 proliferation index in breast core biopsy specimens.

Results: 13/18 tumors demonstrated strongly increased ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 uptake compared to normal breast tissue (defined as PET-positive). All PET-positive primary tumors were ER- and PR-positive (13/13) in contrast to only 1/5 PET-negative tumors. Mean SUV_MAX of ER-positive tumors was 10.6±6.0 compared to 2.3±1.0 in ER-negative tumors (p=0.016). In a multivariate analysis including ER, PR, HER2/neu and MIB-1, only ER expression predicted ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 uptake (model: r²=0.55, p=0.025). Normal breast tissue showed inter- and intraindividually variable, moderate GRPR binding (SUV_MAX 2.3±1.0), while physiological uptake of other organs was considerably less except pancreas. Of note, ⁶⁸Ga-RM2-PET/CT detected internal mammary lymph nodes with high ⁶⁸Ga-RM2 uptake (n=8), a contralateral axillary lymph node metastasis (verified by biopsy) and bone metastases (n=1; not detected by bone scan and CT).

Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that ⁶⁸Ga-RM2-PET/CT is a promising imaging method in ER-positive breast cancer. In vivo GRPR binding assessed by ⁶⁸Ga-RM2-PET/CT correlated with ER expression in primary tumors of untreated patients.

Novel gold nanoparticles coated with somatostatin as a potential delivery system for targeting somatostatin receptors

Targeting of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) like somatostatin-14 (SST-14) could have a potential interest in delivery of anti-cancer agents to tumor cells. Attachment of SST to different nano-carriers e.g. polymeric nanoparticles is limited due to the difficulty of interaction between SST itself and those nano-carriers. Furthermore, the instability problems associated with the final formulation. Attaching of SST to gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) using the positive and negative charge of SST and citrate-AuNPs could be considered a new technique to get stable non-aggregated AuNPs coated with SST. Different analyses techniques have been performed to proof the principle of coating between AuNPs and SST. Furthermore, cellular uptake studies on HCC-1806, HELA and U-87 cell lines has been investigated to show the ability of AuNPs coated SST to enter the cells via SST receptors. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) indicated a successful coating of SST on the MUA-AuNPs surface. Furthermore, all the performed analysis including DLS, SDS-PAGE and UV-VIS absorption spectra indicated a successful coating of AuNPs with SST. Cellular uptake studies on HCC-1806, HELA and U-87 cell lines showed that the number of AuNPs-SST per cell is signiflcantly higher compared to citrate-AuNPs when quantified using inductively coupled plasma spectroscopy. Moreover, the binding of AuNPs-SST to cells can be suppressed by addition of antagonist, indicating that the binding of AuNPs-SST to cells is due to receptor-specific binding. In conclusion, AuNPs could be attached to SST via adsorption to get stable AuNPs coated SST. This new formulation has a potential to target SST receptors localized in many normal and tumor cells.

Human somatostatin receptor-3 distinctively induces apoptosis in MCF-7 and cell cycle arrest in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells

Somatostatin (SST) mediates cytostatic and pro-apoptotic effects through five somatostatin receptors (SSTR1-5). The modest clinical benefits of SST analogs in cancers of different origin such as breast cancer are attributed to diminished SSTRs expression at tumor sites. In the present study, SSTR3 was overexpressed in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231, and analyzed for downstream signaling molecules associated with cytostatic and cytotoxic effect. Cells overexpressing SSTR3 displayed inhibition of EGF induced proliferation and enhanced antiproliferative effect of SSTR3-specific agonist in comparison to non-transfected cells. SSTR3 overexpression in MCF-7 cells (R3-MCF-7) constitutively enhanced TUNEL staining, PARP-1 and p27(Kip1) expression suggesting apoptosis and cell-cycle arrest. Conversely, R3-MB-231 cells with SSTR3 overexpression exerted cytostatic and were devoid of any cytotoxic effects. The expression of PTP-1C and the status of ERK1/2, p38 and PI3K phosphorylation was modulated in a cell-specific manner. These findings provide new insights in understanding the antiproliferative role of SSTR3 in breast tumor biology.

Adenoviral-mediated imaging of gene transfer using a somatostatin receptor-cytosine deaminase fusion protein

Suicide gene therapy is a process by which cells are administered a gene that encodes a protein capable of converting a nontoxic prodrug into an active toxin. Cytosine deaminase (CD) has been widely investigated as a means of suicide gene therapy due to the enzyme’s ability to convert the prodrug 5-fluorocytosine (5-FC) into the toxic compound 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). However, the extent of gene transfer is a limiting factor in predicting therapeutic outcome. The ability to monitor gene transfer, non-invasively, would strengthen the efficiency of therapy. In this regard, we have constructed and evaluated a replication-deficient adenovirus (Ad) containing the human somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SSTR2) fused with a C-terminal yeast CD gene for the non-invasive monitoring of gene transfer and therapy. The resulting Ad (AdSSTR2-yCD) was evaluated in vitro in breast cancer cells to determine the function of the fusion protein. These studies demonstrated that the both the SSTR2 and yCD were functional in binding assays, conversion assays, and cytotoxicity assays. In vivo studies similarly demonstrated the functionality using conversion assays, biodistribution studies, and small animal positron-emission tomography (PET) imaging studies. In conclusion, the fusion protein has been validated as useful for the non-invasive imaging of yCD expression and will be evaluated in the future for monitoring yCD-based therapy.

Inhibition of tumor promoting signals by activation of SSTR2 and opioid receptors in human breast cancer cells

Background

Somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) and opioid receptors (ORs) belong to the superfamily of G-protein coupled receptors and function as negative regulators of cell proliferation in breast cancer. In the present study, we determined the changes in SSTR subtype 2 (SSTR2) and μ, δ and κ-ORs expression, signaling cascades and apoptosis in three different breast cancer cells namely MCF-7, MDA-MB231 and T47D.

Methods

Immunocytochemistry and western blot analysis were employed to study the colocalization and changes in MAPKs (ERK1/2 and p38), cell survival pathway (PI3K/AKT) and tumor suppressor proteins (PTEN and p53) in breast cancer cell lines. The nature of cell death upon activation of SSTR2 or OR was analysed using flow cytometry analysis.

Results

The activation of SSTR2 and ORs modulate MAPKs (ERK1/2 and p38) in cell dependent and possibly estrogen receptor (ER) dependent manner. The activation of tumor suppressor proteins phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and p53 antagonized the PI3K/AKT cell survival pathway. Flow cytometry analyses reveal increased necrosis as opposed to apoptosis in MCF-7 and T47D cells when compared to ER negative MDA-MB231 cells. Furthermore, receptor and agonist dependent expression of ORs in SSTR2 immunoprecipitate suggest that SSTR2 and ORs might interact as heterodimers and inhibit epidermal growth factor receptor phosphorylation.

Conclusion

Taken together, findings indicate a new role for SSTR2/ORs in modulation of signaling pathways involved in cancer progression and provide novel therapeutic approaches in breast cancer treatment.

C-tail mediated modulation of somatostatin receptor type-4 homo- and heterodimerizations and signaling

Somatostatin receptors show great diversity in response to agonist mediated receptor-specific homo- and heterodimerizations. Here, using photobleaching-fluorescence resonance energy transfer, immunocytochemistry, western blot and co-immunoprecipitation, we investigated dimerization, trafficking, coupling to adenylyl cyclase and signaling of human somatostatin receptor-4 (hSSTR4) in HEK-293 cells. We also determined the role of the C-tail of hSSTR4 on physiological responses of the cells. wt-hSSTR4 exogenously expressed in HEK-293 cells exhibits constitutive dimerization, inhibits forskolin-stimulated cAMP, and displays agonist dependent changes in pERK1/2 and pERK5 expressions. Upon C-tail deletion, the receptor loses membrane expression and ability to dimerize and inhibition of cAMP and pERK5 however, displays several-fold increases in the expression of pERK1/2. Chimeric hSSTR4 with the C-tail of hSSTR5 functions like wt-hSSTR4, in contrast, with the C-tail of hSSTR1 functions like C-tail deleted hSSTR4. hSSTR4 dimerization and signaling are associated with increased cyclin-dependent-kinase p27(kip1) expression and inhibition of the cell proliferation. We also report heterodimerization between hSSTR4/hSSTR5, but not between hSSTR4/hSSTR1, with significant changes in receptor functions. Taken together, these data define a novel mechanism for the role of hSSTR4 in cell proliferation and modulation of signaling pathways.

Differential estradiol and selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) regulation of Keratin 13 gene expression and its underlying mechanism in breast cancer cells

Expression of the Keratin 13 (KRT13) gene, which encodes a cytoskeletal protein thought to play important roles in breast cancer growth and metastasis, is differentially regulated by estradiol (E2) and the selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) tamoxifen and raloxifene. While stimulation of KRT13 by tamoxifen is robust and prolonged, stimulation by E2 is more transient and raloxifene has virtually no effect. To investigate the mechanistic basis for the differential ligand regulation of KRT13, we have defined the regulatory regions of KRT13, compared gene expression by E2 and SERMs, and explored the magnitudes and time courses of estrogen receptor (ER) and cofactor recruitment patterns on these regions. Using a ChIP scanning approach and reporter transactivation assays, we identified a 2.5 kb upstream ER-binding regulatory region for KRT13. Directed composite mutations in this region revealed that three estrogen response elements and three Sp1 sites were involved in its ligand-dependent regulation. Differential recruitment of ERalpha and cofactors to the KRT13 regulatory sites paralleled the different time course and magnitude of regulation by these ligands: there was almost no ERalpha or cofactor recruitment with raloxifene, whereas there was strong, prolonged ER recruitment and histone acetylation with tamoxifen, and an early and more transient recruitment with E2. Taken together, our results suggest that the different ligand regulations of KRT13 are due to ligand-differential recruitment of ER and coactivators, and they provide insight into the mechanisms responsible for the different agonistic activities and differential gene regulation by estradiol and the SERMs tamoxifen and raloxifene.

Somatostatin receptors 1 and 5 heterodimerize with epidermal growth factor receptor: agonist-dependent modulation of the downstream MAPK signalling pathway in breast cancer cells

The role of somatostatin (SST) and epidermal growth factor (EGF) in breast cancer is undisputed; however, the molecular mechanisms underlying their antiproliferative or proliferative effects are not well understood. We initially confirmed that breast tumour tissues express all five somatostatin receptors (SSTR1-5) and four epidermal growth factor receptors (ErbB1-4). Subsequently, to gain insight into the function of SSTRs and ErbBs in oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive (MCF-7) or ERalpha-negative (MDA-MB-231) breast cancer cells, we defined SSTR1, SSTR5 and ErbB1 mRNA and protein expression in these two tumour cell lines. Consistent with previous studies showing SSTR1/SSTR5 heterodimerization and having seen cell-specific and ligand-selective alterations in receptor expression, we next elucidated whether SSTR1 and SSTR5 functionally interact with ErbB1 using pbFRET analysis. We subsequently determined the effects of SST and EGF either alone, or in combination, on selected downstream signalling molecules such as erk1/2, p38 and JNK. Here, we showed that both SST and EGF influenced erk1/2 phosphorylation and that SST modulated the effects of EGF in a cell-specific manner. We also demonstrated agonist-, time and cell-dependent regulation of p38 phosphorylation. We further investigated modulation of Grb2, SOS, Shc, SH-PTP1 and SH-PTP2. ErbB1 adaptor proteins known to play a role in MAPK activation, Shc, Grb2 and SOS, changed in an agonist- and cell-specific manner whereas, SH-PTP1 and SH-PTP2, adaptor proteins reported to interact with SSTRs, translocated from the cytosol to membrane in a cell-specific manner following SST and/or EGF treatment. Although several previous studies have shown crosstalk between RTKs and GPCRs, there are no reports describing SSTR (GPCR) modulation of ErbBs (RTK) in breast cancer. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report describing crosstalk/interactions between SSTRs and ErbBs.

Role of somatostatin analogs in the clinical management of non-neuroendocrine solid tumors

The somatostatin analogs octreotide, lanreotide and RC-160 (vapreotide) are known to have direct and indirect antitumor effects. Direct effects include the arrest of tumor growth and stimulation of apoptosis, resulting in tumor shrinkage. Indirect antiproliferative effects may occur through antiangiogenesis, immunomodulatory effects and the suppression of tumor-stimulating growth factors. With a safety profile of somatostatin analogs established over 20 years of clinical use in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors, somatostatin analogs are attractive therapeutic options for patients with non-neuroendocrine tumors. In early clinical trials of somatostatin analogs, however, some cancer patients responded well, while others showed a lack of benefit. This variability in clinical response may reflect the selective binding affinities of octreotide, lanreotide and RC-160, which bind with high affinity to just two of the five different somatostatin receptor subtypes. Treatment response may therefore depend on the specific receptor subtype(s) present in the tumor, the relative proportion of receptor(s) expressed on the tumor cell surface and the absolute quantity of each receptor subtype. Greater understanding of the role of somatostatin receptors, their binding affinities and modes of action has led to increased research into the use of somatostatin analogs, particularly octreotide, in cancer treatment as monotherapies, in combination with hormonal treatments and cytotoxic therapies, and in both adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings. A review of the literature suggests that the antitumor potential of somatostatin analogs should be investigated further and additional studies might determine how these analogs can best be used to improve the treatment of patients with non-neuroendocrine tumors.

Colocalization of somatostatin receptors and epidermal growth factor receptors in breast cancer cells

BACKGROUND

Somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression is positively correlated with tumor size and inversely correlated with epidermal growth factor receptor (ErbB) levels and tumor differentiation. In the present study, we compared SSTR1-5 and ErbB1-4 mRNA and protein expression in two breast cancer cell lines: MCF-7 (ER+) and MDA-MB-231 (ERalpha-).

RESULTS

All five SSTRs and four ErbBs were variably expressed as both cell surface and cytoplasmic proteins. In both cell lines, SSTR4 and SSTR1 were highly expressed, followed by SSTR2 and SSTR5 with SSTR3 being the least expressed subtype, at the protein level. ErbBs were variably expressed with ErbB1 as the predominant subtype in both cell lines. ErbB1 is followed by ErbB3, ErbB2 and ErbB4 in MCF-7 at both the protein and mRNA levels. In MDA-MB-231 cells, ErbB1 is followed by ErbB2, ErbB4 and ErbB3. Our results indicate significant correlations at the level of mRNA and protein expression in a cell and receptor-specific manner. Using indirect immunofluorescence, we found that, in MCF-7 cells, SSTR5 was the most prominent subtype coexpressed with ErbBs followed by SSTR3, SSTR4, SSTR1 and SSTR2, respectively. In MDA-MB-231 cells, SSTR1 colocalized strongly with ErbBs followed by SSTR5, SSTR4, SSTR3 and SSTR2. ErbBs displayed higher levels of colocalization amongst themselves in MCF-7 cells than in MDA-MB-231 cells.

CONCLUSION

These findings may explain the poor response to endocrine therapy in ER-cancer. Differential distribution of SSTR subtypes with ErbBs in breast cancer cells in a receptor-specific manner may be considered as a novel diagnosis for breast tumors.