1
|
Nayiga S, Denyer Willis L, Staedke SG, Chandler CI. Taking Opportunities, Taking Medicines: Antibiotic Use in Rural Eastern Uganda. Med Anthropol 2022; 41:418-430. [PMID: 35324360 PMCID: PMC10040720 DOI: 10.1080/01459740.2022.2047676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
The ways in which dimensions of health and healthcare intersect with economics and politics in particular contexts requires close attention. In this article we connect concerns about antibiotic overuse in Uganda to the social milieu created through policies that follow President Museveni's vision for a population who kulembeka, "tap wealth." Ethnographic fieldwork in rural Eastern Uganda illustrates how taking medicines in rural households reflects a wider landscape of everyday imperatives to "tap" opportunities in a context of acute precarity. We argue for a closer connection between medical and economic anthropology to push forward understanding of health, medicines and wellbeing in Africa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Nayiga
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.,Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Sarah G Staedke
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.,Department of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Clare Ir Chandler
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Masunaga Y, Jaiteh F, Manneh E, Balen J, Okebe J, D'Alessandro U, Nieto-Sanchez C, de Vries DH, Gerrets R, Peeters Grietens K, Muela Ribera J. The Community Lab of Ideas for Health: Community-Based Transdisciplinary Solutions in a Malaria Elimination Trial in The Gambia. Front Public Health 2021; 9:637714. [PMID: 34354972 PMCID: PMC8329351 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.637714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Community participation in global health interventions may improve outcomes and solve complex health issues. Although numerous community participatory approaches have been developed and introduced, there has been little focus on "how" and "who" to involve in the implementation of community-based clinical trials where unequal distribution of power between implementers and communities pre-exists. Addressing how to achieve community-based solutions in a malaria elimination trial in The Gambia, we developed the Community Lab of Ideas for Health (CLIH): a participatory approach that enabled communities to shape trial implementation. Methods: As part of transdisciplinary research, we conducted qualitative research with in-depth interviews, discussions, and observations in 17 villages in the North Bank Region of The Gambia between March 2016 and December 2017. We designed an iterative research process involving ethnography, stakeholder-analysis, participatory-discussions, and qualitative monitoring and evaluation, whereby each step guided the next. We drew upon ethnographic results and stakeholder-analysis to identify key-informants who became participants in study design and implementation. The participatory-discussions provided a co-creative space for sharing community-centric ideas to tackle trial implementation challenges. The proposed strategies for trial implementation were continuously refined and improved through our monitoring and evaluation. Results: The CLIH incorporated communities' insights, to co-create tailored trial implementation strategies including: village health workers prescribing and distributing antimalarial treatments; "compounds" as community-accepted treatment units; medicine distribution following compound micro-politics; and appropriate modes of health message delivery. Throughout the iterative research process, the researchers and communities set the common goal, namely to curtail the medical poverty trap by reducing malaria transmission and the burden thereof. This innovative collaborative process built trust among stakeholders and fully engaged researchers and communities in co-creation and co-implementation of the trial. Discussion: The CLIH approach succeeded in touching the local realities by incorporating a spectrum of perspectives from community-members and discerning project-derived knowledge from local-knowledge. This process allowed us to co-develop locally-oriented solutions and ultimately to co-establish an intervention structure that community-members were ready and willing to use, which resulted in high uptake of the intervention (92% adherence to treatment). Successfully, the CLIH contributed in bridging research and implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoriko Masunaga
- Department of Public Health, Unit of Socio-Ecological Health Research, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Fatou Jaiteh
- Department of Public Health, Unit of Socio-Ecological Health Research, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, Gambia
| | - Ebrima Manneh
- Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, Gambia
| | - Julie Balen
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Joseph Okebe
- Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, Gambia
- Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Umberto D'Alessandro
- Medical Research Council Unit The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Fajara, Gambia
| | - Claudia Nieto-Sanchez
- Department of Public Health, Unit of Socio-Ecological Health Research, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Daniel H. de Vries
- Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - René Gerrets
- Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Koen Peeters Grietens
- Department of Public Health, Unit of Socio-Ecological Health Research, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
- School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Joan Muela Ribera
- PASS Suisse, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
- Medical Anthropology Research Centre (MARC) at Departament d'Antropologia, Filosofia i Treball Social, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Berlin Rubin N, Mboera LE, Lesser A, Miranda ML, Kramer R. Process Evaluation of a Community-Based Microbial Larviciding Intervention for Malaria Control in Rural Tanzania. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:E7309. [PMID: 33036350 PMCID: PMC7579308 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17197309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Revised: 09/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Microbial larviciding can be an effective component of integrated vector management malaria control schemes, although it is not commonly implemented. Moreover, quality control and evaluation of intervention activities are essential to evaluate the potential of community-based larviciding interventions. We conducted a process evaluation of a larval source management intervention in rural Tanzania where local staff were employed to apply microbial larvicide to mosquito breeding habitats with the aim of long-term reductions in malaria transmission. We developed a logic model to guide the process evaluation and then established quantitative indicators to measure intervention success. Quantitative analysis of intervention reach, exposure, and fidelity was performed to assess larvicide application, and interviews with larviciding staff were reviewed to provide context to quantitative results. Results indicate that the intervention was successful in terms of reach, as staff applied microbial larvicide at 80% of identified mosquito breeding habitats. However, the dosage of larvicide applied was sufficient to ensure larval elimination at only 26% of sites, which does not meet the standard set for intervention fidelity. We propose that insufficient training and protocol adaptation, environment and resource issues, and human error contributed to low larvicide application rates. This demonstrates how several small, context-specific details in sum can result in meaningful differences between intervention blueprint and execution. These findings may serve the design of other larval source management interventions by demonstrating the value of additional training, supervision, and measurement and evaluation of protocol adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Berlin Rubin
- Department of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Leonard E.G. Mboera
- SACIDS Foundation for One Health, Sokoine University of Agriculture, 3297 Morogoro, Tanzania;
| | - Adriane Lesser
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (A.L.); (R.K.)
| | - Marie Lynn Miranda
- Department of Applied and Computational Mathematics and Statistics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA;
| | - Randall Kramer
- Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (A.L.); (R.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pascoe SJS, Scott NA, Fong RM, Murphy J, Huber AN, Moolla A, Phokojoe M, Gorgens M, Rosen S, Wilson D, Pillay Y, Fox MP, Fraser‐Hurt N. "Patients are not the same, so we cannot treat them the same" - A qualitative content analysis of provider, patient and implementer perspectives on differentiated service delivery models for HIV treatment in South Africa. J Int AIDS Soc 2020; 23:e25544. [PMID: 32585077 PMCID: PMC7316408 DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2019] [Revised: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 05/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In 2014, the South African government adopted a differentiated service delivery (DSD) model in its "National Adherence Guidelines for Chronic Diseases (HIV, TB and NCDs)" (AGL) to strengthen the HIV care cascade. We describe the barriers and facilitators of the AGL implementation as experienced by various stakeholders in eight intervention and control sites across four districts. METHODS Embedded within a cluster-randomized evaluation of the AGL, we conducted 48 in-depth interviews (IDIs) with healthcare providers, 16 IDIs with Department of Health and implementing partners and 24 focus group discussions (FGDs) with three HIV patient groups: new, stable and those not stable on treatment or not adhering to care. IDIs were conducted from August 2016 to August 2017; FGDs were conducted in January to February 2017. Content analysis was guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Findings were triangulated among respondent types to elicit barriers and facilitators to implementation. RESULTS New HIV patients found counselling helpful but intervention respondents reported sub-optimal counselling and privacy concerns as barriers to initiation. Providers felt insufficiently trained for this intervention and were confused by the simultaneous rollout of the Universal Test and Treat strategy. For stable patients, repeat prescription collection strategies (RPCS) were generally well received. Patients and providers concurred that RPCS reduced congestion and waiting times at clinics. There was confusion though, among providers and implementers, around implementation of RPCS interventions. For patients not stable on treatment, enhanced counselling and tracing patients lost-to-follow-up were perceived as beneficial to adherence behaviours but faced logistical challenges. All providers faced difficulties accessing data and identifying patients in need of tracing. Congestion at clinics and staff attitude were perceived as barriers preventing patients returning to care. CONCLUSIONS Implementation of DSD models at scale is complex but this evaluation identified several positive aspects of AGL implementation. The positive perception of RPCS interventions and challenges managing patients not stable on treatment aligned with results from the larger evaluation. While some implementation challenges may resolve with experience, ensuring providers and implementers have the necessary training, tools and resources to operationalize AGL effectively is critical to the overall success of South Africa's HIV control strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie J S Pascoe
- Health Economics and Epidemiology Research OfficeDepartment of Internal MedicineSchool of Clinical MedicineFaculty of Health SciencesUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
| | - Nancy A Scott
- Department of Global HealthBoston University School of Public HealthBostonMAUSA
| | - Rachel M Fong
- Department of Global HealthBoston University School of Public HealthBostonMAUSA
| | - Joshua Murphy
- Health Economics and Epidemiology Research OfficeDepartment of Internal MedicineSchool of Clinical MedicineFaculty of Health SciencesUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
| | - Amy N Huber
- Health Economics and Epidemiology Research OfficeDepartment of Internal MedicineSchool of Clinical MedicineFaculty of Health SciencesUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
| | - Aneesa Moolla
- Health Economics and Epidemiology Research OfficeDepartment of Internal MedicineSchool of Clinical MedicineFaculty of Health SciencesUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
| | | | | | - Sydney Rosen
- Health Economics and Epidemiology Research OfficeDepartment of Internal MedicineSchool of Clinical MedicineFaculty of Health SciencesUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
- Department of Global HealthBoston University School of Public HealthBostonMAUSA
| | | | - Yogan Pillay
- National Department of HealthPretoriaSouth Africa
| | - Matthew P Fox
- Health Economics and Epidemiology Research OfficeDepartment of Internal MedicineSchool of Clinical MedicineFaculty of Health SciencesUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
- Department of Global HealthBoston University School of Public HealthBostonMAUSA
- Department of EpidemiologyBoston University School of Public HealthBostonMAUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schneider A, Coope C, Michie S, Puleston R, Hopkins S, Oliver I. Implementing a toolkit for the prevention, management and control of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in English acute hospitals trusts: a qualitative evaluation. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19:689. [PMID: 31606053 PMCID: PMC6790044 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4492-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2019] [Accepted: 08/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antimicrobial resistance is an increasing problem in hospitals world-wide. Following other countries, English hospitals experienced outbreaks of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE), a bacterial infection commonly resistant to last resort antibiotics. One way to improve CPE prevention, management and control is the production of guidelines, such as the CPE toolkit published by Public Health England in December 2013. The aim of this research was to investigate the implementation of the CPE toolkit and to identify barriers and facilitators to inform future policies. METHODS Acute hospital trusts (N = 12) were purposively sampled based on their self-assessed CPE colonisation rates and time point of introducing local CPE action plans. Following maximum variation sampling, 44 interviews with hospital staff were conducted between April and August 2017 using a semi-structured topic guide based on the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour Model and the Theoretical Domains Framework, covering areas of influences on behaviour. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS The national CPE toolkit was widely disseminated within infection prevention and control teams (IPCT), but awareness was rare among other hospital staff. Local plans, developed by IPCTs referring to the CPE toolkit while considering local circumstances, were in place in all hospitals. Implementation barriers included: shortage of isolation facilities for CPE patients, time pressures, and competing demands. Facilitators were within hospital and across-hospital collaborations and knowledge sharing, availability of dedicated IPCTs, leadership support and prioritisation of CPE as an important concern. Participants using the CPE toolkit had mixed views, appreciating its readability and clarity about patient management, but voicing concerns about the lack of transparency on the level of evidence and the practicality of implementation. They recommended regular updates, additional clarifications, tailored information and implementation guidance. CONCLUSIONS There were problems with the awareness and implementation of the CPE toolkit and frontline staff saw room for improvement, identifying implementation barriers and facilitators. An updated CPE toolkit version should provide comprehensive and instructive guidance on evidence-based CPE prevention, management and control procedures and their implementation in a modular format with sections tailored to hospitals' CPE status and to different staff groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annegret Schneider
- University College London, Gower St, Bloomsbury, London, WC1E 6BT, UK. .,National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Unit in Evaluation of Interventions, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.
| | - Caroline Coope
- National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Unit in Evaluation of Interventions, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.,Field Service South West, National Infection Service, Public Health England, 2 Rivergate, Bristol, BS1 6EH, UK
| | - Susan Michie
- University College London, Gower St, Bloomsbury, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.,National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Unit in Evaluation of Interventions, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Richard Puleston
- Field Service East Midlands, National Infection Service, Public Health England, Nottingham, NG24LA, UK
| | - Susan Hopkins
- Division of Healthcare-Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Isabel Oliver
- National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Unit in Evaluation of Interventions, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.,Field Service South West, National Infection Service, Public Health England, 2 Rivergate, Bristol, BS1 6EH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sabot K, Marchant T, Spicer N, Berhanu D, Gautham M, Umar N, Schellenberg J. Contextual factors in maternal and newborn health evaluation: a protocol applied in Nigeria, India and Ethiopia. Emerg Themes Epidemiol 2018; 15:2. [PMID: 29441117 PMCID: PMC5800046 DOI: 10.1186/s12982-018-0071-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2017] [Accepted: 01/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Understanding the context of a health programme is important in interpreting evaluation findings and in considering the external validity for other settings. Public health researchers can be imprecise and inconsistent in their usage of the word “context” and its application to their work. This paper presents an approach to defining context, to capturing relevant contextual information and to using such information to help interpret findings from the perspective of a research group evaluating the effect of diverse innovations on coverage of evidence-based, life-saving interventions for maternal and newborn health in Ethiopia, Nigeria, and India. Methods We define “context” as the background environment or setting of any program, and “contextual factors” as those elements of context that could affect implementation of a programme. Through a structured, consultative process, contextual factors were identified while trying to strike a balance between comprehensiveness and feasibility. Thematic areas included demographics and socio-economics, epidemiological profile, health systems and service uptake, infrastructure, education, environment, politics, policy and governance. We outline an approach for capturing and using contextual factors while maximizing use of existing data. Methods include desk reviews, secondary data extraction and key informant interviews. Outputs include databases of contextual factors and summaries of existing maternal and newborn health policies and their implementation. Use of contextual data will be qualitative in nature and may assist in interpreting findings in both quantitative and qualitative aspects of programme evaluation. Discussion Applying this approach was more resource intensive than expected, in part because routinely available information was not consistently available across settings and more primary data collection was required than anticipated. Data was used only minimally, partly due to a lack of evaluation results that needed further explanation, but also because contextual data was not available for the precise units of analysis or time periods of interest. We would advise others to consider integrating contextual factors within other data collection activities, and to conduct regular reviews of maternal and newborn health policies. This approach and the learnings from its application could help inform the development of guidelines for the collection and use of contextual factors in public health evaluation. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12982-018-0071-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Sabot
- 1The Centre for Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health (MARCH), London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT UK.,2Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT UK
| | - Tanya Marchant
- 1The Centre for Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health (MARCH), London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT UK.,2Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT UK
| | - Neil Spicer
- 1The Centre for Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health (MARCH), London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT UK.,3Department of Global Health, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT UK
| | - Della Berhanu
- 1The Centre for Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health (MARCH), London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT UK.,2Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT UK
| | - Meenakshi Gautham
- 1The Centre for Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health (MARCH), London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT UK.,2Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT UK
| | - Nasir Umar
- 1The Centre for Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health (MARCH), London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT UK.,2Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT UK
| | - Joanna Schellenberg
- 1The Centre for Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive and Child Health (MARCH), London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT UK.,2Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Greenland K, Chipungu J, Chilekwa J, Chilengi R, Curtis V. Disentangling the effects of a multiple behaviour change intervention for diarrhoea control in Zambia: a theory-based process evaluation. Global Health 2017; 13:78. [PMID: 29041941 PMCID: PMC5645837 DOI: 10.1186/s12992-017-0302-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2017] [Accepted: 10/05/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diarrhoea is a leading cause of child death in Zambia. As elsewhere, the disease burden could be greatly reduced through caregiver uptake of existing prevention and treatment strategies. We recently reported the results of the Komboni Housewives intervention which tested a novel strategy employing motives including affiliation and disgust to improve caregiver practice of four diarrhoea control behaviours: exclusive breastfeeding; handwashing with soap; and correct preparation and use of oral rehydration salts (ORS) and zinc. The intervention was delivered via community events (women's forums and road shows), at health clinics (group session) and via radio. A cluster randomised trial revealed that the intervention resulted in a small improvement in exclusive breastfeeding practices, but was only associated with small changes in the other behaviours in areas with greater intervention exposure. This paper reports the findings of the process evaluation that was conducted alongside the trial to investigate how factors associated with intervention delivery and receipt influenced caregiver uptake of the target behaviours. METHODS Process data were collected from the eight peri-urban and rural intervention areas throughout the six-month implementation period and in all 16 clusters 4-6 weeks afterwards. Intervention implementation (fidelity, reach, dose delivered and recruitment strategies) and receipt (participant engagement and responses, and mediators) were explored through review of intervention activity logs, unannounced observation of intervention events, semi-structured interviews, focus groups with implementers and intervention recipients, and household surveys. Evaluation methods and analyses were guided by the intervention's theory of change and the evaluation framework of Linnan and Steckler. RESULTS Intervention reach was lower than intended: 39% of the surveyed population reported attending one or more face-to-face intervention event, of whom only 11% attended two or more intervention events. The intervention was not equally feasible to deliver in all settings: fewer events took place in remote rural areas, and the intervention did not adequately penetrate communities in several peri-urban sites where the population density was high, the population was slightly higher socio-economic status, recruitment was challenging, and numerous alternative sources of entertainment existed. Adaptations made by the implementers affected the fidelity of implementation of messages for all target behaviours. Incorrect messages were consequently recalled by intervention recipients. Participants were most receptive to the novel disgust and skills-based interactive demonstrations targeting exclusive breastfeeding and ORS preparation respectively. However, initial disgust elicitation was not followed by a change in associated psychological mediators, and social norms were not measurably changed. CONCLUSIONS The lack of measured behaviour change was likely due to issues with both the intervention's content and its delivery. Achieving high reach and intensity in community interventions delivered in diverse settings is challenging. Achieving high fidelity is also challenging when multiple behaviours are targeted for change. Further work using improved tools is needed to explore the use of subconscious motives in behaviour change interventions. To better uncover how and why interventions achieve their measured effects, process evaluations of complex interventions should develop and employ frameworks for investigation and interpretation that are structured around the intervention's theory of change and the local context. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was registered as part of the larger trial on 5 March 2014 with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02081521 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Greenland
- Department for Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, WC1E 7HT, London, UK
| | - Jenala Chipungu
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Plot 5032 Great North Rd, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Joyce Chilekwa
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Plot 5032 Great North Rd, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Roma Chilengi
- Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia, Plot 5032 Great North Rd, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Val Curtis
- Department for Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, WC1E 7HT, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH FOR ASSESSING, IN THE ABSENCE OF FULL EVIDENCE, WHETHER MULTICOMPONENT INTERVENTIONS CAN BE MORE COST-EFFECTIVE THAN SINGLE COMPONENT INTERVENTIONS. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2017; 33:444-453. [PMID: 28889817 DOI: 10.1017/s0266462317000721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Multicomponent interventions (MCIs), consisting of at least two interventions, are common in rehabilitation and other healthcare fields. When the effectiveness of the MCI versus that of its single interventions is comparable or unknown, evidence of their expected incremental cost-effectiveness can be helpful in deciding which intervention to recommend. As such evidence often is unavailable this study proposes an approach to estimate what is more cost-effective; the MCI or the single intervention(s). METHODS We reviewed the literature for potential methods. Of those identified, headroom analysis was selected as the most suitable basis for developing the approach, based on the criteria of being able to estimate the cost-effectiveness of the single interventions versus that of the MCI (a) within a limited time frame, (b) in the absence of full data, and (c) taking into account carry-over and interaction effects. We illustrated the approach with an MCI for cancer survivors. RESULTS The approach starts with analyzing the costs of the MCI. Given a specific willingness-to-pay-value, it is analyzed how much effectiveness the MCI would need to generate to be considered cost-effective, and if this is likely to be attained. Finally, the cost-effectiveness of the single interventions relative to the potential of the MCI for being cost-effective can be compared. CONCLUSIONS A systematic approach using headroom analysis was developed for estimating whether an MCI is likely to be more cost effective than one (or more) of its single interventions.
Collapse
|
9
|
Birken SA, Bunger AC, Powell BJ, Turner K, Clary AS, Klaman SL, Yu Y, Whitaker DJ, Self SR, Rostad WL, Chatham JRS, Kirk MA, Shea CM, Haines E, Weiner BJ. Organizational theory for dissemination and implementation research. Implement Sci 2017; 12:62. [PMID: 28499408 PMCID: PMC5427584 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-017-0592-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2017] [Accepted: 05/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Even under optimal internal organizational conditions, implementation can be undermined by changes in organizations’ external environments, such as fluctuations in funding, adjustments in contracting practices, new technology, new legislation, changes in clinical practice guidelines and recommendations, or other environmental shifts. Internal organizational conditions are increasingly reflected in implementation frameworks, but nuanced explanations of how organizations’ external environments influence implementation success are lacking in implementation research. Organizational theories offer implementation researchers a host of existing, highly relevant, and heretofore largely untapped explanations of the complex interaction between organizations and their environment. In this paper, we demonstrate the utility of organizational theories for implementation research. Discussion We applied four well-known organizational theories (institutional theory, transaction cost economics, contingency theories, and resource dependency theory) to published descriptions of efforts to implement SafeCare, an evidence-based practice for preventing child abuse and neglect. Transaction cost economics theory explained how frequent, uncertain processes for contracting for SafeCare may have generated inefficiencies and thus compromised implementation among private child welfare organizations. Institutional theory explained how child welfare systems may have been motivated to implement SafeCare because doing so aligned with expectations of key stakeholders within child welfare systems’ professional communities. Contingency theories explained how efforts such as interagency collaborative teams promoted SafeCare implementation by facilitating adaptation to child welfare agencies’ internal and external contexts. Resource dependency theory (RDT) explained how interagency relationships, supported by contracts, memoranda of understanding, and negotiations, facilitated SafeCare implementation by balancing autonomy and dependence on funding agencies and SafeCare developers. Summary In addition to the retrospective application of organizational theories demonstrated above, we advocate for the proactive use of organizational theories to design implementation research. For example, implementation strategies should be selected to minimize transaction costs, promote and maintain congruence between organizations’ dynamic internal and external contexts over time, and simultaneously attend to organizations’ financial needs while preserving their autonomy. We describe implications of applying organizational theory in implementation research for implementation strategies, the evaluation of implementation efforts, measurement, research design, theory, and practice. We also offer guidance to implementation researchers for applying organizational theory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah A Birken
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1103E McGavran-Greenberg, 135 Dauer Drive, Campus Box 7411, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7411, USA.
| | - Alicia C Bunger
- College of Social Work, The Ohio State University, 1947 College Road, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Byron J Powell
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1105C McGavran-Greenberg, 135 Dauer Drive, Campus Box 7411, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7411, USA
| | - Kea Turner
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1107C McGavran-Greenberg, 135 Dauer Drive, Campus Box 7411, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7411, USA
| | - Alecia S Clary
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1107C McGavran-Greenberg, 135 Dauer Drive, Campus Box 7411, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7411, USA
| | - Stacey L Klaman
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 401 Rosenau Hall, Campus Box 7445, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7445, USA
| | - Yan Yu
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, 8th Floor, Sheldon M. Chumir Health Centre, 1213 - 4 Street SW, Calgary, Alberta, T2R 0X7, Canada
| | - Daniel J Whitaker
- School of Public Health, Georgia State University, PO Box 3995, Atlanta, GA, 30302-3995, USA
| | - Shannon R Self
- School of Public Health, Georgia State University, PO Box 3995, Atlanta, GA, 30302-3995, USA
| | - Whitney L Rostad
- School of Public Health, Georgia State University, PO Box 3995, Atlanta, GA, 30302-3995, USA
| | - Jenelle R Shanley Chatham
- School of Public Health, Georgia State University, PO Box 3995, Atlanta, GA, 30302-3995, USA.,National SafeCare Training and Research Center, Mark Chaffin Center for Healthy Development, PO Box 3995, Atlanta, GA, 30302-3995, USA
| | - M Alexis Kirk
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1107C McGavran-Greenberg, 135 Dauer Drive, Campus Box 7411, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7411, USA
| | - Christopher M Shea
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1104F McGavran-Greenberg, 135 Dauer Drive, Campus Box 7411, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7411, USA
| | - Emily Haines
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1107C McGavran-Greenberg, 135 Dauer Drive, Campus Box 7411, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7411, USA
| | - Bryan J Weiner
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Box 357965, Seattle, WA, 98195-7965, USA.,Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Box 357965, Seattle, WA, 98195-7965, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chandler CIR, Webb EL, Maiteki-Sebuguzi C, Nayiga S, Nabirye C, DiLiberto DD, Ssemmondo E, Dorsey G, Kamya MR, Staedke SG. The impact of an intervention to introduce malaria rapid diagnostic tests on fever case management in a high transmission setting in Uganda: A mixed-methods cluster-randomized trial (PRIME). PLoS One 2017; 12:e0170998. [PMID: 28288172 PMCID: PMC5347994 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2016] [Accepted: 01/12/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rapid diagnostic tests for malaria (mRDTs) have been scaled-up widely across Africa. The PRIME study evaluated an intervention aiming to improve fever case management using mRDTs at public health centers in Uganda. METHODS A cluster-randomized trial was conducted from 2010-13 in Tororo, a high malaria transmission setting. Twenty public health centers were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to intervention or control. The intervention included training in health center management, fever case management with mRDTs, and patient-centered services; plus provision of mRDTs and artemether-lumefantrine (AL) when stocks ran low. Three rounds of Interviews were conducted with caregivers of children under five years of age as they exited health centers (N = 1400); reference mRDTs were done in children with fever (N = 1336). Health worker perspectives on mRDTs were elicited through semi-structured questionnaires (N = 49) and in-depth interviews (N = 10). The primary outcome was inappropriate treatment of malaria, defined as the proportion of febrile children who were not treated according to guidelines based on the reference mRDT. FINDINGS There was no difference in inappropriate treatment of malaria between the intervention and control arms (24.0% versus 29.7%, adjusted risk ratio 0.81 [95% CI: 0.56, 1.17] p = 0.24). Most children (76.0%) tested positive by reference mRDT, but many were not prescribed AL (22.5% intervention versus 25.9% control, p = 0.53). Inappropriate treatment of children testing negative by reference mRDT with AL was also common (31.3% invention vs 42.4% control, p = 0.29). Health workers appreciated mRDTs but felt that integrating testing into practice was challenging given constraints on time and infrastructure. CONCLUSIONS The PRIME intervention did not have the desired impact on inappropriate treatment of malaria for children under five. In this high transmission setting, use of mRDTs did not lead to the reductions in antimalarial prescribing seen elsewhere. Broader investment in health systems, including infrastructure and staffing, will be required to improve fever case management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emily L. Webb
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Susan Nayiga
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | | | | | - Grant Dorsey
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, United States of America
| | - Moses R. Kamya
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda
- Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Sarah G. Staedke
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Burchett HED, Leurent B, Baiden F, Baltzell K, Björkman A, Bruxvoort K, Clarke S, DiLiberto D, Elfving K, Goodman C, Hopkins H, Lal S, Liverani M, Magnussen P, Mårtensson A, Mbacham W, Mbonye A, Onwujekwe O, Roth Allen D, Shakely D, Staedke S, Vestergaard LS, Whitty CJM, Wiseman V, Chandler CIR. Improving prescribing practices with rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs): synthesis of 10 studies to explore reasons for variation in malaria RDT uptake and adherence. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e012973. [PMID: 28274962 PMCID: PMC5353269 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The overuse of antimalarial drugs is widespread. Effective methods to improve prescribing practice remain unclear. We evaluated the impact of 10 interventions that introduced rapid diagnostic tests for malaria (mRDTs) on the use of tests and adherence to results in different contexts. DESIGN A comparative case study approach, analysing variation in outcomes across different settings. SETTING Studies from the ACT Consortium evaluating mRDTs with a range of supporting interventions in 6 malaria endemic countries. Providers were governmental or non-governmental healthcare workers, private retail sector workers or community volunteers. Each study arm in a distinct setting was considered a case. PARTICIPANTS 28 cases from 10 studies were included, representing 148 461 patients seeking care for suspected malaria. INTERVENTIONS The interventions included different mRDT training packages, supervision, supplies and community sensitisation. OUTCOME MEASURES Analysis explored variation in: (1) uptake of mRDTs (% febrile patients tested); (2) provider adherence to positive mRDTs (% Plasmodium falciparum positive prescribed/given Artemisinin Combination Treatment); (3) provider adherence to negative mRDTs (% P. falciparum negative not prescribed/given antimalarial). RESULTS Outcomes varied widely across cases: 12-100% mRDT uptake; 44-98% adherence to positive mRDTs; 27-100% adherence to negative mRDTs. Providers appeared more motivated to perform well when mRDTs and intervention characteristics fitted with their own priorities. Goodness of fit of mRDTs with existing consultation and diagnostic practices appeared crucial to maximising the impact of mRDTs on care, as did prior familiarity with malaria testing; adequate human resources and supplies; possible alternative treatments for mRDT-negative patients; a more directive intervention approach and local preferences for ACTs. CONCLUSIONS Basic training and resources are essential but insufficient to maximise the potential of mRDTs in many contexts. Programme design should respond to assessments of provider priorities, expectations and capacities. As mRDTs become established, the intensity of supporting interventions required seems likely to reduce.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen E D Burchett
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Baptiste Leurent
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Frank Baiden
- Epidemiology Unit, Ensign College of Public Health, Kpong, Ghana
| | - Kimberly Baltzell
- Department of Family Health Care Nursing, and Global Health Science, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - Anders Björkman
- Department of Microbiology, Tumour and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Katia Bruxvoort
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Siân Clarke
- Disease Control Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Deborah DiLiberto
- Clinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Kristina Elfving
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Goteborg, Sweden
- Department of Paediatrics, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Goteborg, Sweden
- Department of Microbiology, Tumour and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Catherine Goodman
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Heidi Hopkins
- Disease Control Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Sham Lal
- Disease Control Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Marco Liverani
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Pascal Magnussen
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Centre for Medical Parasitology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Andreas Mårtensson
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Wilfred Mbacham
- Laboratory for Public Health Research Biotechnologies, The Biotechnology Center, University of Yaoundé, Yaoundé, Cameroon
| | - Anthony Mbonye
- School of Public Health- Makerere University and Commissioner Health Services, Ministry of Health, Uganda
| | - Obinna Onwujekwe
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Nigeria Enugu-Campus, Nigeria
| | | | - Delér Shakely
- Department of Microbiology, Tumour and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Medicine, Kungälv Hospital, Sweden
| | - Sarah Staedke
- Clinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Lasse S Vestergaard
- Centre for Medical Parasitology, University of Copenhagen and Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Denmark
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Statens Serum Institut, Denmark
| | - Christopher J M Whitty
- Clinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Virginia Wiseman
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Australia
| | - Clare I R Chandler
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chandler CIR, Burchett H, Boyle L, Achonduh O, Mbonye A, DiLiberto D, Reyburn H, Onwujekwe O, Haaland A, Roca-Feltrer A, Baiden F, Mbacham WF, Ndyomugyenyi R, Nankya F, Mangham-Jefferies L, Clarke S, Mbakilwa H, Reynolds J, Lal S, Leslie T, Maiteki-Sebuguzi C, Webster J, Magnussen P, Ansah E, Hansen KS, Hutchinson E, Cundill B, Yeung S, Schellenberg D, Staedke SG, Wiseman V, Lalloo DG, Whitty CJM. Examining Intervention Design: Lessons from the Development of Eight Related Malaria Health Care Intervention Studies. Health Syst Reform 2016; 2:373-388. [PMID: 31514719 PMCID: PMC6176770 DOI: 10.1080/23288604.2016.1179086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract—Rigorous evidence of “what works” to improve health care is in demand, but methods for the development of interventions have not been scrutinized in the same ways as methods for evaluation. This article presents and examines intervention development processes of eight malaria health care interventions in East and West Africa. A case study approach was used to draw out experiences and insights from multidisciplinary teams who undertook to design and evaluate these studies. Four steps appeared necessary for intervention design: (1) definition of scope, with reference to evaluation possibilities; (2) research to inform design, including evidence and theory reviews and empirical formative research; (3) intervention design, including consideration and selection of approaches and development of activities and materials; and (4) refining and finalizing the intervention, incorporating piloting and pretesting. Alongside these steps, projects produced theories, explicitly or implicitly, about (1) intended pathways of change and (2) how their intervention would be implemented.The work required to design interventions that meet and contribute to current standards of evidence should not be underestimated. Furthermore, the process should be recognized not only as technical but as the result of micro and macro social, political, and economic contexts, which should be acknowledged and documented in order to infer generalizability. Reporting of interventions should go beyond descriptions of final intervention components or techniques to encompass the development process. The role that evaluation possibilities play in intervention design should be brought to the fore in debates over health care improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare I R Chandler
- Department of Global Health and Development , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Helen Burchett
- Department of Global Health and Development , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Louise Boyle
- Department of Global Health and Development , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Olivia Achonduh
- Laboratory for Public Health Research Biotechnologies, The Biotechnology Center, University of Yaoundé I , Yaoundé , Cameroon
| | - Anthony Mbonye
- School of Public Health-Makerere University & Commissioner Health Services, Ministry of Health , Kampala , Uganda
| | - Deborah DiLiberto
- Clinical Research Department , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Hugh Reyburn
- Disease Control Department , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Obinna Onwujekwe
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics , University of Nigeria Enugu-Campus , Enugu , Nigeria
| | - Ane Haaland
- Institute of Health and Society , Department of Community Medicine , Blindern , Oslo , Norway
| | | | - Frank Baiden
- Malaria Group, Kintampo Health Research Centre , Kintampo , Ghana
| | - Wilfred F Mbacham
- Laboratory for Public Health Research Biotechnologies, The Biotechnology Center, University of Yaoundé I , Yaoundé , Cameroon
| | | | - Florence Nankya
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration , Kampala , Uganda
| | - Lindsay Mangham-Jefferies
- Department of Global Health and Development , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Sian Clarke
- Disease Control Department , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Hilda Mbakilwa
- Joint Malaria Programme, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre , Moshi , Tanzania
| | - Joanna Reynolds
- Department of Global Health and Development , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Sham Lal
- Disease Control Department , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Toby Leslie
- Disease Control Department , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | | | - Jayne Webster
- Disease Control Department , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Pascal Magnussen
- Centre for Medical Parasitology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen , Denmark
| | - Evelyn Ansah
- Dangme West District Health Directorate, Ghana Health Service , Dodowa , Ghana
| | - Kristian S Hansen
- Department of Global Health and Development , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Eleanor Hutchinson
- Department of Global Health and Development , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Bonnie Cundill
- Disease Control Department , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Shunmay Yeung
- Department of Global Health and Development , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - David Schellenberg
- Disease Control Department , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Sarah G Staedke
- Disease Control Department , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Virginia Wiseman
- Department of Global Health and Development , London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London , UK.,School of Public Health and Community Medicine , Kensington , New South Wales , Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fletcher A, Jamal F, Moore G, Evans RE, Murphy S, Bonell C. Realist complex intervention science: Applying realist principles across all phases of the Medical Research Council framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions. EVALUATION (LONDON, ENGLAND : 1995) 2016; 22:286-303. [PMID: 27478401 PMCID: PMC4946011 DOI: 10.1177/1356389016652743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
The integration of realist evaluation principles within randomised controlled trials ('realist RCTs') enables evaluations of complex interventions to answer questions about what works, for whom and under what circumstances. This allows evaluators to better develop and refine mid-level programme theories. However, this is only one phase in the process of developing and evaluating complex interventions. We describe and exemplify how social scientists can integrate realist principles across all phases of the Medical Research Council framework. Intervention development, modelling, and feasibility and pilot studies need to theorise the contextual conditions necessary for intervention mechanisms to be activated. Where interventions are scaled up and translated into routine practice, realist principles also have much to offer in facilitating knowledge about longer-term sustainability, benefits and harms. Integrating a realist approach across all phases of complex intervention science is vital for considering the feasibility and likely effects of interventions for different localities and population subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Chris Bonell
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Staedke SG, Maiteki-Sebuguzi C, DiLiberto DD, Webb EL, Mugenyi L, Mbabazi E, Gonahasa S, Kigozi SP, Willey BA, Dorsey G, Kamya MR, Chandler CIR. The Impact of an Intervention to Improve Malaria Care in Public Health Centers on Health Indicators of Children in Tororo, Uganda (PRIME): A Cluster-Randomized Trial. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2016; 95:358-367. [PMID: 27273646 PMCID: PMC4973182 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2016] [Accepted: 05/04/2016] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Optimizing quality of care for malaria and other febrile illnesses is a complex challenge of major public health importance. To evaluate the impact of an intervention aiming to improve malaria case management on the health of community children, a cluster-randomized trial was conducted from 2010–2013 in Tororo, Uganda, where malaria transmission is high. Twenty public health centers were included; 10 were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to intervention or control. Households within 2 km of health centers provided the sampling frame for the evaluation. The PRIME intervention included training in fever case management using malaria rapid diagnostic tests (mRDTs), patient-centered services, and health center management; plus provision of mRDTs and artemether–lumefantrine. Cross-sectional community surveys were conducted at baseline and endline (N = 8,766), and a cohort of children was followed for approximately 18 months (N = 992). The primary outcome was prevalence of anemia (hemoglobin < 11.0 g/dL) in children under 5 years of age in the final community survey. The intervention was delivered successfully; however, no differences in prevalence of anemia or parasitemia were observed between the study arms in the final community survey or the cohort. In the final survey, prevalence of anemia in children under 5 years of age was 62.5% in the intervention versus 63.1% in control (adjusted risk ratio = 1.01; 95% confidence interval = 0.91–1.13; P = 0.82). The PRIME intervention, focusing on training and commodities, did not produce the expected health benefits in community children in Tororo. This challenges common assumptions that improving quality of care and access to malaria diagnostics will yield health gains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah G Staedke
- Department of Clinical Research, Department of Medical Statistics, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.,Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | - Deborah D DiLiberto
- Department of Clinical Research, Department of Medical Statistics, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emily L Webb
- Department of Clinical Research, Department of Medical Statistics, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Levi Mugenyi
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.,I-Biostat, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Edith Mbabazi
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | - Simon P Kigozi
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Barbara A Willey
- Department of Clinical Research, Department of Medical Statistics, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Grant Dorsey
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Moses R Kamya
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.,Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Clare I R Chandler
- Department of Clinical Research, Department of Medical Statistics, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
DiLiberto DD, Staedke SG, Nankya F, Maiteki-Sebuguzi C, Taaka L, Nayiga S, Kamya MR, Haaland A, Chandler CIR. Behind the scenes of the PRIME intervention: designing a complex intervention to improve malaria care at public health centres in Uganda. Glob Health Action 2015; 8:29067. [PMID: 26498744 PMCID: PMC4620687 DOI: 10.3402/gha.v8.29067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2015] [Revised: 09/20/2015] [Accepted: 09/22/2015] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In Uganda, health system challenges limit access to good quality healthcare and contribute to slow progress on malaria control. We developed a complex intervention (PRIME), which was designed to improve quality of care for malaria at public health centres. Objective Responding to calls for increased transparency, we describe the PRIME intervention's design process, rationale, and final content and reflect on the choices and challenges encountered during the design of this complex intervention. Design To develop the intervention, we followed a multistep approach, including the following: 1) formative research to identify intervention target areas and objectives; 2) prioritization of intervention components; 3) review of relevant evidence; 4) development of intervention components; 5) piloting and refinement of workshop modules; and 6) consolidation of the PRIME intervention theories of change to articulate why and how the intervention was hypothesized to produce desired outcomes. We aimed to develop an intervention that was evidence-based, grounded in theory, and appropriate for the study context; could be evaluated within a randomized controlled trial; and had the potential to be scaled up sustainably. Results The process of developing the PRIME intervention package was lengthy and dynamic. The final intervention package consisted of four components: 1) training in fever case management and use of rapid diagnostic tests for malaria (mRDTs); 2) workshops in health centre management; 3) workshops in patient-centred services; and 4) provision of mRDTs and antimalarials when stocks ran low. Conclusions The slow and iterative process of intervention design contrasted with the continually shifting study context. We highlight the considerations and choices made at each design stage, discussing elements we included and why, as well as those that were ultimately excluded. Reflection on and reporting of ‘behind the scenes’ accounts of intervention design may improve the design, assessment, and generalizability of complex interventions and their evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah D DiLiberto
- Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK;
| | - Sarah G Staedke
- Department of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.,Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | | | - Lilian Taaka
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Susan Nayiga
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Moses R Kamya
- Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.,School of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Ane Haaland
- Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Clare I R Chandler
- Department of Global Health & Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
Many interventions are not disruptive enough of the patterns that entrench poor health and health inequities. Ways forward may require a break with tradition to embrace system-focussed theory, complex logic modelling, and ways of funding and responding to problems that address the competition of ideas and needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Penelope Hawe
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Angwenyi V, Asante KP, Traoré A, Febir LG, Tawiah C, Kwarteng A, Ouédraogo A, Sirima SB, Owusu-Agyei S, Imoukhuede EB, Webster J, Chandramohan D, Molyneux S, Jones C. Health providers' perceptions of clinical trials: lessons from Ghana, Kenya and Burkina Faso. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0124554. [PMID: 25933429 PMCID: PMC4416706 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2014] [Accepted: 03/15/2015] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical trials conducted in Africa often require substantial investments to support trial centres and public health facilities. Trial resources could potentially generate benefits for routine health service delivery but may have unintended consequences. Strengthening ethical practice requires understanding the potential effects of trial inputs on the perceptions and practices of routine health care providers. This study explores the influence of malaria vaccine trials on health service delivery in Ghana, Kenya and Burkina Faso. METHODS We conducted: audits of trial inputs in 10 trial facilities and among 144 health workers; individual interviews with frontline providers (n=99) and health managers (n=14); and group discussions with fieldworkers (n=9 discussions). Descriptive summaries were generated from audit data. Qualitative data were analysed using a framework approach. RESULTS Facilities involved in trials benefited from infrastructure and equipment upgrades, support with essential drugs, access to trial vehicles, and placement of additional qualified trial staff. Qualified trial staff in facilities were often seen as role models by their colleagues; assisting with supportive supervision and reducing facility workload. Some facility staff in place before the trial also received formal training and salary top-ups from the trials. However, differential access to support caused dissatisfaction, and some interviewees expressed concerns about what would happen at the end of the trial once financial and supervisory support was removed. CONCLUSION Clinical trials function as short-term complex health service delivery interventions in the facilities in which they are based. They have the potential to both benefit facilities, staff and communities through providing the supportive environment required for improvements in routine care, but they can also generate dissatisfaction, relationship challenges and demoralisation among staff. Minimising trial related harm and maximising benefits requires careful planning and engagement of key actors at the outset of trials, throughout the trial and on its' completion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vibian Angwenyi
- Department of Public Health Research, KEMRI/Wellcome Trust Research Programme (KWTRP), P.O. Box, 230–80108, Kilifi, Kenya
- * E-mail:
| | - Kwaku-Poku Asante
- Kintampo Health Research Centre (KHRC), P.O. Box 200, Kintampo, Ghana
| | - Abdoulaye Traoré
- Centre National de Recherche et de Formation sur le Paludisme (CNRFP), 01 BP 2208, Ouagadougou 01, Burkina Faso
| | | | - Charlotte Tawiah
- Kintampo Health Research Centre (KHRC), P.O. Box 200, Kintampo, Ghana
| | - Anthony Kwarteng
- Kintampo Health Research Centre (KHRC), P.O. Box 200, Kintampo, Ghana
| | - Alphonse Ouédraogo
- Centre National de Recherche et de Formation sur le Paludisme (CNRFP), 01 BP 2208, Ouagadougou 01, Burkina Faso
| | - Sodiomon Bienvenue Sirima
- Centre National de Recherche et de Formation sur le Paludisme (CNRFP), 01 BP 2208, Ouagadougou 01, Burkina Faso
| | - Seth Owusu-Agyei
- Kintampo Health Research Centre (KHRC), P.O. Box 200, Kintampo, Ghana
| | - Egeruan Babatunde Imoukhuede
- European Vaccine Initiative (EVI),Universitäts Klinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 326, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jayne Webster
- Disease Control Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), Keppel Street, WC1E 7HT, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Chandramohan
- Disease Control Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), Keppel Street, WC1E 7HT, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sassy Molyneux
- Department of Public Health Research, KEMRI/Wellcome Trust Research Programme (KWTRP), P.O. Box, 230–80108, Kilifi, Kenya
- The Ethox Centre, Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, United Kingdom
- The Centre for Clinical Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, United Kingdom
| | - Caroline Jones
- Department of Public Health Research, KEMRI/Wellcome Trust Research Programme (KWTRP), P.O. Box, 230–80108, Kilifi, Kenya
- Disease Control Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), Keppel Street, WC1E 7HT, London, United Kingdom
- The Centre for Clinical Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Okwaro FM, Chandler CIR, Hutchinson E, Nabirye C, Taaka L, Kayendeke M, Nayiga S, Staedke SG. Challenging logics of complex intervention trials: community perspectives of a health care improvement intervention in rural Uganda. Soc Sci Med 2015; 131:10-7. [PMID: 25748110 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.02.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Health systems in many African countries are failing to provide populations with access to good quality health care. Morbidity and mortality from curable diseases such as malaria remain high. The PRIME trial in Tororo, rural Uganda, designed and tested an intervention to improve care at health centres, with the aim of reducing ill-health due to malaria in surrounding communities. This paper presents the impact and context of this trial from the perspective of community members in the study area. Fieldwork was carried out for a year from the start of the intervention in June 2011, and involved informal observation and discussions as well as 13 focus group discussions with community members, 10 in-depth interviews with local stakeholders, and 162 context descriptions recorded through quarterly interviews with community members, health workers and district officials. Community members observed a small improvement in quality of care at most, but not all, intervention health centres. However, this was diluted by other shortfalls in health services beyond the scope of the intervention. Patients continued to seek care at health centres they considered inadequate as well as positioning themselves and their children to access care through other sources such as research and nongovernmental organization (NGO) projects. These findings point to challenges of designing and delivering interventions within a paradigm that requires factorial (reduced to predictable factors) problem definition with easily actionable and evaluable solutions by small-scale projects. Such requirements mean that interventions often work on the periphery of a health system rather than tackling the murky political and economic realities that shape access to care but are harder to change or evaluate with randomized controlled trials. Highly projectified settings further reduce the ability to genuinely 'control' for different health care access scenarios. We argue for a raised consciousness of how evaluation paradigms impact on intervention choices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ferdinand M Okwaro
- Department of Global Health & Development, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, WC1H 9SH London, UK.
| | - Clare I R Chandler
- Department of Global Health & Development, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, WC1H 9SH London, UK.
| | - Eleanor Hutchinson
- Department of Global Health & Development, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, WC1H 9SH London, UK.
| | - Christine Nabirye
- Infectious Disease Research Collaboration, Mulago Hospital, P.O. Box 7475, Kampala, Uganda.
| | - Lilian Taaka
- Infectious Disease Research Collaboration, Mulago Hospital, P.O. Box 7475, Kampala, Uganda.
| | - Miriam Kayendeke
- Infectious Disease Research Collaboration, Mulago Hospital, P.O. Box 7475, Kampala, Uganda.
| | - Susan Nayiga
- Infectious Disease Research Collaboration, Mulago Hospital, P.O. Box 7475, Kampala, Uganda.
| | - Sarah G Staedke
- Department of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Nayiga S, DiLiberto D, Taaka L, Nabirye C, Haaland A, Staedke SG, Chandler CIR. Strengthening patient-centred communication in rural Ugandan health centres: A theory-driven evaluation within a cluster randomized trial. EVALUATION (LONDON, ENGLAND : 1995) 2014; 20:471-491. [PMID: 25983612 PMCID: PMC4425297 DOI: 10.1177/1356389014551484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
This article describes a theory-driven evaluation of one component of an intervention to improve the quality of health care at Ugandan public health centres. Patient-centred services have been advocated widely, but such approaches have received little attention in Africa. A cluster randomized trial is evaluating population-level outcomes of an intervention with multiple components, including 'patient-centred services.' A process evaluation was designed within this trial to articulate and evaluate the implementation and programme theories of the intervention. This article evaluates one hypothesized mechanism of change within the programme theory: the impact of the Patient Centred Services component on health-worker communication. The theory-driven approach extended to evaluation of the outcome measures. The study found that the proximal outcome of patient-centred communication was rated 10 percent higher (p < 0.008) by care seekers consulting with the health workers who were at the intervention health centres compared with those at control health centres. This finding will strengthen interpretation of more distal trial outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Nayiga
- Infectious Disease Research Collaboration, Uganda
| | | | - Lilian Taaka
- Infectious Disease Research Collaboration, Uganda
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Staedke SG, Chandler CIR, DiLiberto D, Maiteki-Sebuguzi C, Nankya F, Webb E, Dorsey G, Kamya MR. The PRIME trial protocol: evaluating the impact of an intervention implemented in public health centres on management of malaria and health outcomes of children using a cluster-randomised design in Tororo, Uganda. Implement Sci 2013; 8:114. [PMID: 24079295 PMCID: PMC3851935 DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2013] [Accepted: 09/19/2013] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In Africa, inadequate health services contribute to the lack of progress on malaria control. Evidence of the impact of interventions to improve health services on population-level malaria indicators is needed. We are conducting a cluster-randomised trial to assess whether a complex intervention delivered at public health centres in Uganda improves health outcomes of children and treatment of malaria, as compared to the current standard of care. Methods/Design Twenty public health centres (level II and III) in Tororo district will be included; 10 will be randomly assigned to the intervention and 10 to control. Clusters will include households located within 2 km of health centres. The trial statistician will generate the random allocation sequence and assign clusters. Health centres will be stratified by level, and restricted randomisation will be employed to ensure balance on cluster location and size. Allocation will not be blinded. The intervention includes training in health centre management, fever case management with use of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for malaria, and patient-centered services, and provision of artemether-lumefantrine (AL) and RDTs when stocks run low. The impact of the intervention on population-level health indicators will be assessed through community surveys conducted at baseline in randomly selected children from each cluster, and repeated annually for two years. The impact on individuals over time will be assessed in a cohort study of children recruited from households randomly selected per cluster. The impact on health centres will be assessed using patient exit interviews, monthly surveillance, and assessment of health worker knowledge and skills. The primary outcome is the prevalence of anaemia (haemoglobin <11.0 g/dL) in individual children under five measured in the annual community surveys. The primary analysis will be based on the cluster-level results. Discussion The PRIME trial findings will be supplemented by the PROCESS study, an evaluation of the process, context, and wider impact of the PRIME intervention which will be conducted alongside the main trial, together providing evidence of the health impact of a public sector intervention in Uganda. Trial registration and funding This trial is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01024426) and is supported by the ACT Consortium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah G Staedke
- Department of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|