1
|
Reuter U, Heinze A, Gendolla A, Sieder C, Hentschke C. Erenumab versus topiramate: migraine-related disability, impact and health-related quality of life. Eur J Neurol 2024:e16437. [PMID: 39132915 DOI: 10.1111/ene.16437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2024] [Revised: 07/24/2024] [Accepted: 07/25/2024] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE HER-MES was the first head-to-head study of erenumab against topiramate (standard of care). This post hoc analysis of the HER-MES study evaluated the effect of erenumab versus topiramate on patient-reported outcomes at week 24. METHODS Adult patients with episodic or chronic migraine (n = 777) were randomized (1:1) to monthly subcutaneous erenumab (n = 389) or daily oral topiramate (n = 388). Migraine-related disability, as measured by the Headache Impact Test 6 (HIT-6) and Short Form 36 Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2), was analysed in the entire study cohort and true completers. RESULTS In the erenumab group (vs. topiramate), significant improvements were reported in Headache Impact Test 6 total scores (composite populations, -10.88 vs. -7.72; true completers, -11.92 vs. -10.61) and a higher proportion of patients achieved a ≥5-point reduction from baseline with erenumab (composite populations, 72.2% vs. 53.9%; true completers, 79.64% vs. 71.43%). The adjusted mean change from baseline in the SF-36v2 score was greater with erenumab for both physical component summary (composite population, 5.48 vs. 3.63; true completers, 5.95 vs. 5.23) and mental component summary (composite populations, 1.00 vs. -1.18; true completers, 1.74 vs. -0.33). A higher proportion of patients on erenumab versus topiramate had a ≥5-point improvement in SF-36v2 for the physical component summary (composite populations, 47.7% vs. 37.4%; true completers, 52.1% vs. 48.9%) and mental component summary (composite populations, 25.3% vs. 16.8%; true completers, 27.3% vs. 17.7%). CONCLUSIONS This post hoc analysis demonstrated that patients treated with erenumab had significant improvements in headache impact and quality of life as measured by patient-reported outcomes versus patients treated with topiramate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uwe Reuter
- Department of Neurology, Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Universitatsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Axel Heinze
- Schmerzklinik Kiel, Migraine and Headache Center, Kiel, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rattanawong W, Rapoport A, Srikiatkhachorn A. Medication "underuse" headache. Cephalalgia 2024; 44:3331024241245658. [PMID: 38613233 DOI: 10.1177/03331024241245658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many risk factors have been associated with migraine progression, including insufficient and ineffective utilization of migraine medications; however, they have been inadequately explored. This has resulted in suboptimal usage of medications without effective altering of prescribing recommendations for patients, posing a risk for migraine chronification. METHODS Our aim is to conduct a comprehensive review of the available evidence regarding the underuse of migraine medications, both acute and preventive. The term "underuse" includes, but is not limited to: (1) ineffective use of appropriate and inappropriate medication; (2) underutilization; (3) inappropriate timing of usage; and (4) patient dissatisfaction with medication. RESULTS The underuse of both acute and preventive medications has been shown to contribute to the progression of migraine. In terms of acute medication, chronification occurs as a result of insufficient drug use, including failure of the prescriber to select the appropriate type based on pain intensity and disability, patients taking medication too late (more than 60 minutes after the onset or after central sensitization has occurred as evidenced by allodynia), and discontinuation because of lack of effect or intolerable side effects. The underlying cause of inadequate effectiveness of acute medication lies in its inability to halt the propagation of peripheral activation to central sensitization in a timely manner. For oral and injectable preventive migraine medications, insufficient efficacy and intolerable side effects have led to poor adherence and discontinuation with subsequent progression of migraine. The underlying pathophysiology here is rooted in the repetitive stimulation of afferent sensory pain fibers, followed by ascending brainstem pain pathways plus dysfunction of the endogenous descending brainstem pain inhibitory pathway. Although anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) medications partially address pain caused by the above factors, including decreased efficacy and tolerability from conventional therapy, some patients do not respond well to this treatment. Research suggests that initiating preventive anti-CGRP treatment at an early stage (during low frequency episodic migraine attacks) is more beneficial than commencing it during high frequency episodic attacks or when chronic migraine has begun. CONCLUSIONS The term "medication underuse" is underrecognized, but it holds significant importance. Optimal usage of acute care and preventive migraine medications could potentially prevent migraine chronification and improve the treatment of migraine attacks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wanakorn Rattanawong
- Faculty of Medicine, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Alan Rapoport
- Department of Neurology, The David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anan Srikiatkhachorn
- Faculty of Medicine, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Moskatel LS, Graber-Naidich A, He Z, Zhang N. The introduction of the CGRP monoclonal antibodies and their effect on the prescription patterns of chronic migraine preventive medications in a tertiary headache center: A retrospective, observational analysis. Headache 2024; 64:188-194. [PMID: 37882379 DOI: 10.1111/head.14642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of the introduction of the calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (CGRP mAbs) in 2018 on the prescribing of older medications for the prevention of chronic migraine. BACKGROUND Prior to 2018, the preventive treatment of migraine borrowed from medications intended to treat other illnesses with the last medication, onabotulinumtoxinA, receiving Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for the prevention of chronic migraine in 2010. The FDA approval of three CGRP mAbs in 2018 provided the ideal natural experiment to assess how the introduction of these medications, and a fourth in 2020, affected the generally stable migraine preventive medications market. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort analysis using the aggregated de-identified data of 6595 patients. The percentage of patients with chronic migraine who had been prescribed one of ten most prescribed oral preventive medications or onabotulinumtoxinA, or any of the four CGRP mAbs, were calculated relative to the total number of patients with chronic migraine who received a prescription for any medication from our clinic during the pre-CGRP mAb years of 2015-2017 and post-approval years of 2019-2021. RESULTS We observed a statistically significant decrease in the prescription of the top 10 most prescribed medications after the introduction of the CGRP mAbs overall (1456/3144, 46.3%, to 1995/4629, 43.1%, p = 0.001), as well as with most individual medications, including large decreases in verapamil (230/3144, 7.3%, to 125/4629, 2.7%; p < 0.001), the tricyclic antidepressants (494/3144, 15.7%, to 532/4629, 11.5%; p < 0.001), topiramate (566/3144, 18.0%, to 653/4629, 14.1%; p < 0.001), and onabotulinumtoxinA (861/3144, 27.4%, to 1134/4629, 24.5%; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION The introduction of the CGRP mAbs during 2018 resulted in a decrease in utilization of most oral medications and onabotulinumtoxinA for the prevention of migraine. Future work should continue to observe how the prescription patterns of these medications evolve with time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leon S Moskatel
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Anna Graber-Naidich
- Quantitative Sciences Unit, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Zihuai He
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
- Quantitative Sciences Unit, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Niushen Zhang
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bjørk MH, Borkenhagen S, Oteiza F, Dueland AN, Sørgaard FE, Sæther EM, Bugge C. Comparative retention and effectiveness of migraine preventive treatments: A nationwide registry-based cohort study. Eur J Neurol 2024; 31:e16062. [PMID: 37754544 PMCID: PMC11235668 DOI: 10.1111/ene.16062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Little is known about the comparative effects of migraine preventive drugs. We aimed to estimate treatment retention and effectiveness of migraine preventive drugs in a nationwide registry-based cohort study in Norway between 2010 and 2020. METHODS We assessed retention, defined as the number of uninterrupted treatment days, and effectiveness, defined as the reduction in filled triptan prescriptions during four 90-day periods after the first preventive prescription, compared to a 90-day baseline period. We compared retention and efficacy for different drugs against beta blockers. Comparative retention was estimated with hazard ratios (HRs), adjusted for covariates, using Cox regression, and effectiveness as odds ratios (ORs) using logistic regression, with propensity-weighted adjustment for covariates. RESULTS We identified 104,072 migraine patients, 81,890 of whom were female (78.69%) and whose mean (standard deviation) age was 44.60 (15.61) years. Compared to beta blockers, botulinum toxin (HR 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-0.44) and calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway antibodies (CGRPabs; HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.59-0.66) were the least likely to be discontinued, while clonidine (HR 2.95, 95% CI 2.88-3.02) and topiramate (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.31-1.37) were the most likely to be discontinued. Patients on simvastatin, CGRPabs, and amitriptyline were more likely to achieve a clinically significant reduction in triptan use during the first 90 days of treatment, with propensity score-adjusted ORs of 1.28 (95% CI 1.19-1.38), 1.23 (95% CI 0.79-1.90), and 1.13 (95% CI 1.08-1.17), respectively. CONCLUSIONS We found a favorable effect of CGRPabs, amitriptyline, and simvastatin compared with beta blockers, while topiramate and clonidine were associated with poorer outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marte H. Bjørk
- Department of Clinical MedicineUniversity of BergenBergenNorway
- Department of NeurologyHaukeland University HospitalBergenNorway
- NorHEAD, Norwegian Headache Research CentreNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
| | | | | | - Aud N. Dueland
- Sandvika NevrosenterSandvikaNorway
- Department of NeurologyOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
| | | | | | - Christoffer Bugge
- Oslo EconomicsOsloNorway
- Department of Health Management and Health EconomicsUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Moskatel LS, Zhang N. The Role of Step Therapy in the Treatment of Migraine. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2023; 27:571-577. [PMID: 37542597 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-023-01155-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review examines recent evidence and applies bioethical principles to evaluate the benefits and risks of using step therapy in the treatment of migraine. RECENT FINDINGS With the CGRP mAbs, gepants, and lasmiditan now on the market for up to 5 years, new research, including network meta-analyses and long-term use studies, can evaluate the comparative efficacy, tolerability, and adherence of these medications relative to older acute and preventive medications for the treatment of migraine. Deciding how medications are chosen for patients requires accounting for many factors including sustainability, efficacy, tolerability, and preference. Newer research can help give clarity on the appropriateness of gating certain treatment options behind others.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leon S Moskatel
- Division of Headache, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, 211 Quarry Road, Suite #206, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
| | - Niushen Zhang
- Division of Headache, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, 211 Quarry Road, Suite #206, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schoenen J, Van Dycke A, Versijpt J, Paemeleire K. Ten open questions in migraine prophylaxis with monoclonal antibodies blocking the calcitonin-gene related peptide pathway: a narrative review. J Headache Pain 2023; 24:99. [PMID: 37528353 PMCID: PMC10391994 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01637-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023] Open
Abstract
The monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) blocking the calcitonin-gene related peptide (CGRP) pathway, collectively called here "anti-CGRP/rec mAbs", have dramatically improved preventive migraine treatment. Although their efficacy and tolerability were proven in a number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and, maybe even more convincingly, in real world settings, a number of open questions remain. In this narrative review, we will analyze published data allowing insight in some of the uncertainties related to the use of anti-CGRP/rec mAbs in clinical practice: their differential efficacy in migraine subtypes, outcome predictors, switching between molecules, use in children and adolescents, long-term treatment adherence and persistence, effect persistence after discontinuation, combined treatment with botulinum toxin or gepants, added-value and cost effectiveness, effectiveness in other headache types, and potential contraindications based on known physiological effects of CGRP. While recent studies have already provided hints for some of these questions, many of them will not find reliable and definitive answers before larger studies, registries or dedicated RCTs are available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Schoenen
- Headache Research Unit, Department of Neurology‑Citadelle Hospital, University of Liège, Boulevard du 12 ème de Ligne 1, Liège, 4000, Belgium.
| | - Annelies Van Dycke
- Department of Neurology, General Hospital Sint-Jan Bruges, Ruddershove 10, Bruges, 8000, Belgium
| | - Jan Versijpt
- Department of Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, Brussels, 1090, Belgium
| | - Koen Paemeleire
- Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent, 9000, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wells-Gatnik W, Martelletti P. Antiseizure medications as migraine preventatives: a call for action for a teratogenic and neurodevelopmental risk removal. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2023; 22:777-781. [PMID: 37575009 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2023.2247963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A recent study has demonstrated an increased risk of neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism spectrum disorder, in individuals exposed to either valproate or topiramate monotherapy. Regulatory bodies have initiated a review to reassess the safety of topiramate exposure during pregnancy. These novel findings raise concerns regarding the recommendation of antiseizure medications in women of childbearing potential. This manuscript highlights current research defining concerns specific to the use of valproate and topiramate in women of childbearing potential. AREAS COVERED This manuscript summarizes recent findings regarding the safety of valproate and topiramate when compared to alternative therapies for the preventative treatment of migraine in women of childbearing potential. The studies included in this review were selected following a comprehensive literature review of multiple relevant databases. All studies that were published within the past 15 years were considered for inclusion. EXPERT OPINION The use of valproate and topiramate in women of childbearing potential should be highly discouraged. Our recommendations include a review of current prescribing guidelines, further public education regarding the neurodevelopmental and congenital risks associated with the use of valproate and topiramate, and an appeal for further research defining the safety of alternative medications for migraine prevention when intrauterine exposure is possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paolo Martelletti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Headache research in 2022: advances and remaining challenges. Lancet Neurol 2023; 22:14-15. [PMID: 36517156 DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(22)00489-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|