1
|
Turvey ST, Lau EYX, Duncan C, Ma H, Liu H. Assessing the information-content of messy data to reconstruct population recovery dynamics for the world's rarest primate. Ecol Evol 2024; 14:e70089. [PMID: 39114163 PMCID: PMC11303811 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Revised: 06/20/2024] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Understanding the dynamics of population recovery in threatened species requires robust longitudinal monitoring datasets. However, evidence-based decision-making is often impeded by variable data collection approaches, necessitating critical evaluation of restricted available baselines. The Hainan gibbon, the world's rarest primate, had possibly declined to only seven or eight individuals in 1978 at Bawangling National Nature Reserve but has experienced subsequent population growth. Past population estimates lack detailed reporting of survey effort, and multiple conflicting estimates are available, hindering assessment of gibbon recovery. We investigated all reported estimates of Bawangling gibbon population size from 1978 to 2022, to evaluate the biological signal of population trends and the extent to which noise associated with varying survey effort, reporting and estimation may mask or misrepresent any underlying signal. This longitudinal dataset demonstrates that the Bawangling population experienced a series of bottlenecks and recoveries, with three successive periods of growth interspersed by population crashes (1978-1989, 1989-2000 and 2000-2022). The rate of gibbon population recovery was progressively slower over time in each successive period of growth, and this potential decline in recovery rate following serial bottlenecks suggests that additional management strategies may be required alongside "nature-based solutions" for this species. However, population viability analysis suggests the 1978 founder population is unlikely to have been as low as seven individuals, raising concerns for interpreting reported historical population counts and understanding the dynamics of the species' recovery. We caution against overinterpreting potential signals within "messy" conservation datasets, and we emphasise the crucial importance of standardised replicable survey methods and transparent reporting of data and effort in all future surveys of Hainan gibbons and other highly threatened species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Clare Duncan
- Institute of ZoologyZoological Society of LondonLondonUK
- Centre for Ecology & Conservation, Biosciences, College of Life and Environmental SciencesUniversity of ExeterCornwallUK
| | - Heidi Ma
- Institute of ZoologyZoological Society of LondonLondonUK
| | - Hui Liu
- School of Tropical Agriculture and ForestryHainan UniversityHaikouChina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cheyne SM, Capilla BR, K. A, Supiansyah, Adul, Cahyaningrum E, Smith DE. Home range variation and site fidelity of Bornean southern gibbons [Hylobates albibarbis] from 2010-2018. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0217784. [PMID: 31365525 PMCID: PMC6668788 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2019] [Accepted: 05/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Gibbons are highly territorial and have two key areas within these territories. The core area in which we find all sleeping trees and the trees from which the gibbons duet and the wider home range (HR) which has varying levels of overlap with neighbouring gibbon groups. The core area is strenously defended, with the wider HR being more of a shared area for neighbouring groups. We present ranging and movement data on four wild gibbon groups from January 2010 to July 2018. Global Positioning System (GPS) data were collected every 5 mins on habitauted groups in Sebangau, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia resulting in 35,521 waypoints. Gibbon home- and corerange sizes were calculated using 95%, and 50%, volume contours of kernel density estimates. Home-ranges ranged from 58.74-147.75 ha with a mean of 95.7 ± SD 37.75 ha, the highest of comparable Hylobates species. Core-range size ranged from 20.7-51.31 ha with a mean size of 31.7 ± SD 13.76 ha. Gibbons had consistant site fidelity for their home- and core ranges; percentage overlap ranged from 4.3 23.97% with a mean 16.5 ± SD 8.65% overlap in home-range area. Core ranges did not overlap with the exception of two groups, in which a 0.64 ha (2.69%) overlap occurred. Unsurprisingly forest loss from fire does affect the location of the HR of the impacted group, but does not appear to affect adjacent groups, though more data are needed on this. Understanding the complex use of space of these territorial animals is important in assessing both carrying capacity for wild populations and understading how reintroduced gibbon pairs will establish their core and HR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan M. Cheyne
- Borneo Nature Foundation, Palangka Raya, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Abdulaziz K.
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Supiansyah
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Adul
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Eka Cahyaningrum
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dunbar RIM, Cheyne SM, Lan D, Korstjens A, Lehmann J, Cowlishaw G. Environment and time as constraints on the biogeographical distribution of gibbons. Am J Primatol 2019; 81:e22940. [DOI: 10.1002/ajp.22940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2018] [Revised: 11/14/2018] [Accepted: 11/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Susan M. Cheyne
- Borneo Nature Foundation; Palangka Raya; Indonesia & Oxford Brookes University; Oxford UK
| | - Daoying Lan
- Guangdong Institute of Applied Biological Resources; Guangzhou China
| | - Amanda Korstjens
- Department of Life and Environmental Sciences; Bournemouth University; Poole UK
| | - Julia Lehmann
- Department of Life Science; University of Roehampton; London UK
| | - Guy Cowlishaw
- Institute of Zoology; Zoological Society of London; London UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Guan ZH, Ma CY, Fei HL, Huang B, Ning WH, Ni QY, Jiang XL, Fan PF. Ecology and social system of northern gibbons living in cold seasonal forests. Zool Res 2018; 39:255-265. [PMID: 29551759 PMCID: PMC5968854 DOI: 10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2018.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2017] [Accepted: 01/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Gibbons in China represent the northernmost margin of present day gibbon species distribution (around N25°). Compared to tropical habitats, northern gibbon habitats are characterized by low temperatures and remarkable seasonal variation in fruit abundance. How gibbons adapt to their cold and seasonal habitats and what ecological factors affect their sociality are key questions for understanding their ecology and social system evolution, the elucidation of which will contribute to the conservation of these special populations/species. According to preliminary short-term studies, northern gibbons consume more leaves and use larger home ranges than tropical gibbons. Interestingly, some Nomascus groups consist of more than one adult female. However, these preliminary results are not well understood or incorporated into current socio-ecological theories regarding gibbon species. To better understand northern gibbons, our team has systematically studied three habituated groups of Nomascus concolor, three groups of N. nasutus, and two habituated groups of Hoolock tianxing since 2002. In this paper, we stress the challenges facing gibbons living in northern habitats and summarize their behavioral adaptations to their harsh environments. We also describe the northern gibbon social system and discuss the potential relationships between their ecology and sociality. Finally, we highlight future research questions related to northern gibbons in China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen-Hua Guan
- Yunnan Academy of Biodiversity, Forest Disaster Warning and Control Key Laboratory, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming Yunnan 650224, China
| | - Chang-Yong Ma
- School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou Guangdong 510275, China
| | - Han-Lan Fei
- School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou Guangdong 510275, China
| | - Bei Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming Yunnan 650223, China
| | - Wen-He Ning
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming Yunnan 650223, China
| | - Qing-Yong Ni
- College of Animal Sciences and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu Sichuan 611130, China
| | - Xue-Long Jiang
- State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming Yunnan 650223, China
| | - Peng-Fei Fan
- School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou Guangdong 510275, China; E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bryant JV, Zeng X, Hong X, Chatterjee HJ, Turvey ST. Spatiotemporal requirements of the Hainan gibbon: Does home range constrain recovery of the world's rarest ape? Am J Primatol 2017; 79:1-13. [PMID: 28118498 DOI: 10.1002/ajp.22617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2016] [Revised: 10/14/2016] [Accepted: 10/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Conservation management requires an evidence-based approach, as uninformed decisions can signify the difference between species recovery and loss. The Hainan gibbon, the world's rarest ape, reportedly exploits the largest home range of any gibbon species, with these apparently large spatial requirements potentially limiting population recovery. However, previous home range assessments rarely reported survey methods, effort, or analytical approaches, hindering critical evaluation of estimate reliability. For extremely rare species where data collection is challenging, it also is unclear what impact such limitations have on estimating home range requirements. We re-evaluated Hainan gibbon spatial ecology using 75 hr of observations from 35 contact days over 93 field-days across dry (November 2010-February 2011) and wet (June 2011-September 2011) seasons. We calculated home range area for three social groups (N = 21 individuals) across the sampling period, seasonal estimates for one group (based on 24 days of observation; 12 days per season), and between-group home range overlap using multiple approaches (Minimum Convex Polygon, Kernel Density Estimation, Local Convex Hull, Brownian Bridge Movement Model), and assessed estimate reliability and representativeness using three approaches (Incremental Area Analysis, spatial concordance, and exclusion of expected holes). We estimated a yearly home range of 1-2 km2 , with 1.49 km2 closest to the median of all estimates. Although Hainan gibbon spatial requirements are relatively large for gibbons, our new estimates are smaller than previous estimates used to explain the species' limited recovery, suggesting that habitat availability may be less important in limiting population growth. We argue that other ecological, genetic, and/or anthropogenic factors are more likely to constrain Hainan gibbon recovery, and conservation attention should focus on elucidating and managing these factors. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS Re-evaluation reveals Hainan gibbon home range as c. 1-2 km2 . Hainan gibbon home range is, therefore, similar to other Nomascus gibbons. Limited data for extremely rare species does not necessarily prevent derivation of robust home range estimates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica V Bryant
- Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, UK.,Department of Genetics, Evolution & Environment, University College London, London, UK
| | - Xingyuan Zeng
- Bawangling National Nature Reserve Management Office, Changjiang Lizu Autonomous County, Hainan, China
| | - Xiaojiang Hong
- Bawangling National Nature Reserve Management Office, Changjiang Lizu Autonomous County, Hainan, China
| | - Helen J Chatterjee
- Department of Genetics, Evolution & Environment, University College London, London, UK
| | - Samuel T Turvey
- Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bryant JV, Gottelli D, Zeng X, Hong X, Chan BPL, Fellowes JR, Zhang Y, Luo J, Durrant C, Geissmann T, Chatterjee HJ, Turvey ST. Assessing current genetic status of the Hainan gibbon using historical and demographic baselines: implications for conservation management of species of extreme rarity. Mol Ecol 2016; 25:3540-56. [PMID: 27273107 DOI: 10.1111/mec.13716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2015] [Revised: 05/13/2016] [Accepted: 05/31/2016] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Evidence-based conservation planning is crucial for informing management decisions for species of extreme rarity, but collection of robust data on genetic status or other parameters can be extremely challenging for such species. The Hainan gibbon, possibly the world's rarest mammal, consists of a single population of ~25 individuals restricted to one protected area on Hainan Island, China, and has persisted for over 30 years at exceptionally low population size. Analysis of genotypes at 11 microsatellite loci from faecal samples for 36% of the current global population and tissue samples from 62% of existing historical museum specimens demonstrates limited current genetic diversity (Na = 2.27, Ar = 2.24, He = 0.43); diversity has declined since the 19th century and even further within the last 30 years, representing declines of ~30% from historical levels (Na = 3.36, Ar = 3.29, He = 0.63). Significant differentiation is seen between current and historical samples (FST = 0.156, P = 0.0315), and the current population exhibits extremely small Ne (current Ne = 2.16). There is evidence for both a recent population bottleneck and an earlier bottleneck, with population size already reasonably low by the late 19th century (historical Ne = 1162.96). Individuals in the current population are related at the level of half- to full-siblings between social groups, and full-siblings or parent-offspring within a social group, suggesting that inbreeding is likely to increase in the future. The species' current reduced genetic diversity must be considered during conservation planning, particularly for expectations of likely population recovery, indicating that intensive, carefully planned management is essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J V Bryant
- Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, NW1 4RY, UK.,Department of Genetics, Evolution & Environment, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - D Gottelli
- Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, NW1 4RY, UK
| | - X Zeng
- Bawangling National Nature Reserve Management Office, Changjiang Lizu Autonomous County, Hainan, 572722, China
| | - X Hong
- Bawangling National Nature Reserve Management Office, Changjiang Lizu Autonomous County, Hainan, 572722, China
| | - B P L Chan
- Kadoorie Conservation China, Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden, Lam Kam Road, Tai Po, New Territories, Hong Kong
| | - J R Fellowes
- The Kadoorie Institute, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong
| | - Y Zhang
- Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650223, China.,College of Life Sciences, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650091, China
| | - J Luo
- College of Life Sciences, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650091, China
| | - C Durrant
- Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, NW1 4RY, UK
| | - T Geissmann
- Anthropological Institute, University Zurich-Irchel, Winterthurerstrasse 190, Zurich, CH-8057, Switzerland
| | - H J Chatterjee
- Department of Genetics, Evolution & Environment, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - S T Turvey
- Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, NW1 4RY, UK
| |
Collapse
|