Efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive treatment in IgA nephropathy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Causal role of immune cells in IgA nephropathy: a mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND

Previous observational studies have shown that immune cells play an important role in IgA nephropathy. However, the specific causal relationship between the two is inconsistent.

METHODS

We used a two-sample mendelian randomization(MR) analysis to investigate the causal association between 731 immune cell signatures and IgA nephropathy in this study. Based on published GWAS data, immune cells were characterized by four immune types absolute cell (AC) counts, median fluorescence intensity (MFI), morphological parameters (MP), relative cell (RC) counts. Meanwhile, heterogeneity test, horizontal pleiotropy and sensitivity test were used to evaluate the robustness and reliability of the results.

RESULTS

An important causal association was achieved for 14 RC traits/IgA nephropathy, 3 AC traits/IgA nephropathy, 10 MFI traits/IgA nephropathy, and 1 MP trait/IgA nephropathy. However, after false discovery rate (FDR) correction, only one immunophenotype was found to be protective against IgA nephropathy. The OR of herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM) on terminally differentiated CD4+ T cell (maturation stages of T-cell panel) on IgA nephropathy risk was estimated to be 0.727 (95%CI: 0.624-0.847, p = 4.20e - 05, PFDR = 0.023) according to inverse variance weighting (IVW) method, and the weighted-median method yielded similar results (OR = 0.743, 95% CI: 0.596-0.927, p = 0.008). Although not statistically significant, the association was consistent with MR-Egger, simple mode and weighted mode.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study further confirmed that immune cells play a complex and important role in the pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy, providing evidence for clinical research.

Immunosuppressant Agents as Add-On Therapy Failed to Improve the Outcome of Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy with Crescent Score C1

INTRODUCTION

The renoprotective benefits of adding immunosuppressant therapy to corticosteroid (CS) treatment for immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) patients with less than 25% crescent formation (C1) remain uncertain, warranting further research.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on IgAN patients with crescent C1 lesions confirmed by renal biopsy at Xinqiao Hospital between May 1, 2017, and May 1, 2020. Patients were stratified into either the CS treatment group or the CS combined with an additional immunosuppressant therapy group. Follow-up assessments were conducted within 24 months. Propensity score analysis was used to match patients receiving CS and CS + immunosuppressant drug treatment in a 1:1 ratio. Primary outcomes included changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR). Subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate the benefits of different populations. Composite endpoint outcomes comprised a 30% eGFR decrease, end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) necessitating dialysis or transplant, or kidney disease-related mortality. Adverse events were also compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

296 IgAN patients with C1 lesions were included in the analysis. Baseline characteristics indicated that IgAN patients in the CS + immunosuppressant group exhibited poorer renal function and higher UACR levels. Propensity score analysis effectively minimized the influence of baseline clinical characteristics, including age, serum creatinine, initial eGFR, UACR, and 24-h proteinuria. Both treatment groups demonstrated continuous eGFR improvement and significant UACR reduction during follow-up, especially at 6 months. However, no significant differences in eGFR and UACR reduction rates were observed between the two groups throughout the entire follow-up period, both before and after matching. Subgroup analysis revealed improved eGFR in both treatment groups, notably among patients with an initial eGFR below 90 mL/min/1.73 m2. Conversely, IgAN patients with C1 lesions and a cellular crescent ratio exceeding 50% treated with CS and immunosuppressant therapy experienced a significant improvement in renal function and a decline in urinary protein creatinine ratio. Composite endpoint outcomes did not significantly differ between the two groups, while the incidence of adverse events was comparable.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the addition of immunosuppressant therapy to corticosteroid monotherapy did not confer significant therapeutic advantages in patients with C1 lesions compared to CS monotherapy, although some specific patient populations appeared to derive modest benefits from this combined approach.

Systemic and targeted steroids for the treatment of IgA nephropathy

Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is a common glomerulonephritis partially correlated with mucosal immune system dysfunction. Progressive renal failure occurs in many patients, with about 30-50% of the patients with IgAN developing end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Many treatments have been used for decades, despite uncertainty about their effectiveness and the ideal dose. Randomised controlled trials reported that systemic glucocorticoids can be an effective treatment for patients with persistent and significant proteinuria despite renin-angiotensin system inhibitors use possibly causing systemic side effects. The primary focus of IgAN management should be based on optimised supportive care, including renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade and now SGLT2 inhibitors. The novel targeted-release formulation (TRF) of budesonide has been tested to reduce the adverse events of systemic steroids by delivering the drug to the distal ileum. The local efficacy of TRF-budesonide may represent a novel and promising approach to treating IgAN. Two clinical trials showed that TRF-budesonide could significantly reduce proteinuria and haematuria and possibly preserve renal function while significantly reducing the side effects. However, the limited number of treated patients and the relatively short follow-up suggest caution before considering budesonide superior to the current six-months steroid pulses scheme. Long-term data on the efficacy and safety of TRF budesonide are awaited, together with the design of trials with a head-to-head comparison with systemic steroids before considering TRF-budesonide as the standard of care treatment for IgAN nephropathy.

Associations of corticosteroid therapy and tonsillectomy with kidney survival in a multicenter prospective study for IgA nephropathy

Efficacy of systemic corticosteroid therapy (CS) for long-term kidney survival in patients with IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is controversial. Therefore, prospective studies evaluating targeted therapies to lymphatic tissues in mucosal immune system responsible for production of nephritogenic IgA have been desired worldwide. Here, we aimed to evaluate the associations of CS and combination therapy of CS and tonsillectomy (CS + Tx) with kidney survival, using database from a nationwide multicenter prospective cohort study on IgAN. Primary outcome was a 50% increase in serum creatinine from baseline or dialysis induction. The analysis included 941 patients (CS/CS + Tx/non-CS 239/364/338), 85 (9.0%) of whom reached outcomes during median follow-up of 5.5 (interquartile range 2.0-8.0) years. On overlap weighting analysis with balanced baseline characteristics, CS and CS + Tx were associated with lower risk of kidney events when compared with non-CS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-0.88 and HR 0.20, 95%CI 0.09-0.44, respectively). Notably, when compared with the CS, CS + Tx was associated with a lower risk of kidney events (HR 0.40, 95%CI 0.18-0.91). Present study demonstrated, keeping with favorable association of systemic CS with kidney survival, concurrent tonsillectomy as one of targeted interventions to lymphatic tissues may provide additional improvement to kidney survival in patients with IgAN.

Immunosuppressants or corticosteroids compared with supportive therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety for IgA nephropathy treatment

Background

Corticosteroids or immunosuppressants and supportive treatment in reducing the risk of proteinuria and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy (IgAN) patients were still controversial. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of immunosuppressants or corticosteroids compared with supportive therapy for treatment of IgAN in order to provide guidance for clinical practice.

Methods

We conducted an online search in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases to collect randomized control trials (RCTs) about the efficacy and safety of immunosuppressants or corticosteroids compared with supportive therapy for treatment of IgA for relevant literature published from the databases' inception to August 21, 2021. The Cochrane risk assessment tool was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies and analyzed by Revman 5.4 software, and Stata 15.0 statistical software was adopted for meta-analysis.

Results

A total of 10,622 related studies were retrieved, and 11 RCTs were finally included in the meta-analysis, with a total sample size of 809 cases. The primary outcome measures for immunosuppressants or corticosteroids were better than those for supportive therapy: proteinuria [weighted mean difference (WMD) =-0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.63, -0.44, Z =10.79, P<0.001] and ESKD [relative risk (RR) =0.189, 95% CI: 0.059, 0.605, Z =2.81, P=0.005]. The secondary outcome measures were also better than that for supportive treatment: glomerular filtration rate [standardized mean difference (SMD) =0.32, 95% CI: 0.09, 0.54, Z =2.48, P=0.013]. The incidence of adverse reactions was consistent with that of supportive treatment, and the difference was not statistically significant (RR =1.06, 95% CI: 0.71, 1.59, Z =0.28, P=0.777).

Discussion

Current evidence shows that immunosuppressants and corticosteroids can significantly reduce the risk of proteinuria and ESKD in IgAN patients. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are need to verify above conclusion. In addition, we hope that more rationally designed multicenter RCTs that are not limited to short-term treatment outcomes will be conducted in the future.

A Novel Scoring System Based on Oxford Classification Indicating Steroid Therapy Use for IgA Nephropathy

Introduction

The usefulness of the Oxford classification (MEST-C score) for deciding the management approach for IgA nephropathy (IgAN) remains unclear.

Methods

Effects of steroid therapy on the long-term prognosis for all 858 patients with IgAN and patients classified according to each MEST-C score were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. Steroid responder score (SRS) and steroid nonresponder score (SNRS) were determined using individual pathology scores when steroids were found to be independently associated, or not, with clinical benefits. In addition, the effects of steroid therapy according to the total SRS/SNRS were analyzed.

Results

Steroid therapy improved the 20-year renal survival rates of patients with IgAN after matching (steroids[+] vs. steroids[−]; estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] [ml/min per 1.73 m²]: 79.4 vs. 77.0, not significant; proteinuria [g/d]: 0.80 vs. 0.62, not significant; renal survival rate: 75.5% vs. 61.7%; P = 0.025) and of patients with M1, E1, S1, C1+2, and T0 scores. Therefore, we considered the total of the M1, E1, S1, and C1+2 scores (point 0: low, 1–2: medium, and 3–4: high) as the SRS and the total of the T1+2 scores (0: low and 1: high) as the SNRS. Multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that steroid therapy improved the renal prognosis of patients with IgAN with high SRS and any SNRS, unlike patients with IgAN with medium SRS and any SNRS.

Conclusion

Patients with M1, E1, S1, and C1+2 scores responded to steroid therapy; however, those with T1+2 scores did not. Although a high SRS was a useful indicator for steroid therapy, SNRS indicated resistance to steroid therapy.

IgA Nephropathy: "The Times They Are a-Changin"

Background

Primary IgA Nephropathy (IgA N) is a very common and often progressive glomerular disease. At present, the diagnosis of IgA N is totally dependent on kidney biopsy, but the prospect for a future diagnosis by means of a "liquid" biopsy is promising. A great deal is now understood regarding its diverse clinical and pathological features as well as its epidemiology, genetics, prognosis, and pathogenesis. Treatment approaches are now on increasingly solid evidence-based grounds, but many uncertainties continue to be devil the field. Better means of categorization of patients into a hierarchy of progression risk at the time of diagnosis will undoubtedly refine and personalize treatment decisions.

Summary

The panorama of treatment strategies is undergoing a rapid transformation, largely due to an increase in large randomized clinical trials testing available agents and novel therapeutic classes. It is anticipated that the combination of better prognostic tools and new strategies for treatment of IgA N will alter the landscape of therapeutic algorithms for patients with IgA N.

Key Messages

This review seeks to describe some of the evolutionary changes in the approach to treatment of IgA N, to place them in the context of current management, and to identify knowledge gaps that need to be addressed.

Enumerating the role of properdin in the pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy and its possible therapies

BACKGROUND

IgA nephropathy (IgAN) has become the most prevalent form of glomerulonephritis affecting almost 1.3% of the total population worldwide. It is an autoimmune disorder where the host autoantibody forms an immune complex with the defective galactose-deficient IgA1 and gets deposited at the mesangium and endocapillary region of glomeruli. IgA has the capability to activate alternative and lectin complement cascades which even aggravates the condition. Properdin is directly associated with IgAN by activating and stabilising the alternative complement pathway at the mesangium, thereby causing progressive renal damage.

OBJECTIVE

The present review mainly focuses on correlating the influence of properdin in activating the complement cascade at glomeruli which is the major cause of disease exacerbation. Secondly, we have described the probable therapies and new targets that are under trials to check their efficacy in IgAN.

METHODS

An in-depth research was carried out from different peer-reviewed articles till December 2020 from several renowned databases like PubMed, Frontier, and MEDLINE, and the information was analysed and written in a simplified manner.

RESULTS

Co-deposition of properdin is observed along with IgA and C3 in 75%-100% of the patients. It is not yet fully understood whether properdin inhibition can attenuate IgAN, as many conflicting reports have revealed worsening of IgAN after impeding properdin.

CONCLUSION

With no specific cure still available, the treatment strategies are of great concern to find a better target to restrict the disease progression. More research and clinical trials are required to find out a prominent target to combat IgAN.

Efficacy and Safety of Immunosuppressive Monotherapy Agents for IgA Nephropathy: A Network Meta-Analysis

Background: The efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive monotherapy agents were evaluated for immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) using a network meta-analysis approach. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published prior to October 1, 2019, using immunosuppressive agents for treating IgAN, were systematically searched in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. Relative risks (RRs) or standard mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using the random-effects model. The primary outcomes were clinical remission, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and serious adverse events (SAEs). The secondary outcomes were urinary protein excretion and serum creatinine. Results: Twenty-five RCTs with 2,005 participants were deemed eligible. Six medications were evaluated: corticosteroids, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), tacrolimus (TAC), cyclosporine, leflunomide, and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). Steroids (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.17-1.93), MMF (RR 2.05, 95% CI 1.15-3.65), TAC (RR 3.67, 95% CI 1.06-12.63), and HCQ (RR 3.25, 95% CI 1.05-10.09) significantly improved clinical remission rates compared to supportive care alone. Only steroids reduced the risk of ESRD (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.12-0.98); however, there were significantly more SAEs than in the control group (RR 2.90, 95% CI 1.37-6.13). No significantly different effects in serum creatinine levels were found among the therapies. MMF showed no significant improvement in remission when excluding studies with a follow-up of fewer than 2 years in the sensitivity analysis (RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.40-4.92). The effect of TAC in the decrease of proteinuria was reversed after discontinuing medication for 3 months; the long-term effects of HCQ could not be evaluated due to the short follow-up duration. Conclusion: Corticosteroids might induce remission and increase renal survival in IgAN; however, adverse reactions should be taken into consideration. MMF, TAC, and HCQ might improve the remission of proteinuria when treating IgAN, but showed no superiority compared to steroids, and the long-term effects require further study.

Efficacy and safety of leflunomide in IgA nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal therapy for immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) remains uncertain. Leflunomide (LEF) is an immunosuppressive drug which may reduce deposition of glomerular autoantibodies and immune complexes. Several clinical trials were designed to evaluate the efficacy of LEF, but their results were controversial.

METHODS

Ovid Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and CNKI were systematically searched. Search terms included ("glomerulonephritis" OR "nephritis") AND ("immunoglobulin A" OR "IgA") AND "leflunomide". Studies in which patients were diagnosed with IgAN based on renal biopsy were included. Studies needed to report clinical outcomes via either short- or long-term clinical examination, remission rate, or complication rate.

RESULTS

Forty-four studies encompassing 1802 patients were included, of which 35 were randomized controlled trials. Results of 24 h post-treatment urine protein tests and serum creatinine tests were significantly lower in patients treat with LEF and corticosteroids (CS) or valsartan (ACEI) (CS + LEF or CS + ACEI) compared with patients treated with CS or ACEI alone (P < 0.05). More patients treated with CS + LEF (31.2%) achieved complete remission (CR) than patients treated with CS alone (22.2%) (RR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.59-0.85, P < 0.05). Although there was no significant difference in CR between patients treated with cyclophosphamide and CS (CS + CTX) and those treated with CS + LEF, the complication rate in the former group was higher (28.4%) than in the latter one (11.4%) (RR = 2.46, 95% CI 1.47-4.13, P < 0.005).

CONCLUSION

LEF appears to improve renal function while decreasing loss of urine protein. Combination regimens including LEF were better and safer compared with CS or ACEI alone or combinations including CTX.