A retrospective chart review of drug treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among patients with metastatic or recurrent soft tissue sarcoma refractory to one or more prior chemotherapy treatments

The Survival Outcomes, Prognostic Factors and Adverse Events following Systemic Chemotherapy Treatment in Bone Sarcomas: A Retrospective Observational Study from the Experience of the Cancer Referral Center in Northern Thailand

This study aimed to assess survival outcomes, prognostic factors, and adverse events following chemotherapy treatment for osteosarcoma and Ewing’s sarcoma. This retrospective observational study was conducted to collect the data of the patients with osteosarcoma or Ewing’s sarcoma who received chemotherapy treatment between 2008 and 2019. The flexible parametric survival model was performed to explore the adjusted survival probability and the prognostic factors. A total of 102 patients (79 with osteosarcoma and 23 with Ewing’s sarcoma) were included. The estimated 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) probabilities in patients with resectable disease were 60.9% and 63.3% for osteosarcoma, and 54.4% and 88.3% for Ewing’s sarcoma, respectively, whereas the 5-year DFS and 5-year OS for those with unresectable/metastatic disease remained below 25%. Two prognostic factors for osteosarcoma included a response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and female gender. Ewing’s sarcoma patients aged 25 years and older were significantly associated with poorer survival outcomes. Of 181 chemotherapy treatment cycles, common self-reported adverse symptoms included tumor pain (n = 32, 17.7%), fever (n = 21, 11.6%), and fatigue (n = 16, 8.8%), while common grade III adverse events included febrile neutropenia (n = 13, 7.3%) and neutropenia (n = 9, 5.1%). There was no chemotherapy-related mortality (grade V) or anaphylaxis events.

SAINT: A Phase I/Expanded Phase II Study Using Safe Amounts of Ipilimumab, Nivolumab and Trabectedin as First-Line Treatment of Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma

BACKGROUND

This Phase 1/2 study is based on the hypothesis that immune checkpoint inhibitors are more effective when given earlier in the course of the disease for advanced soft tissue sarcoma.

METHODS

Phase I endpoints-maximum tolerated dose in previously treated patients; Phase II endpoints-best response, progression free survival and overall survival and incidence of adverse events in previously untreated patients; Phase I treatments-escalating doses of trabectedin (1.0, 1.2, 1.5 mg/m²) as continuous intravenous infusion over 24 h every 3 weeks, 1 mg/kg of ipilimumab given intravenously every 12 weeks, and 3 mg/kg of nivolumab given intravenously every 2 weeks; Phase II treatments-maximum tolerated dose of trabectedin and defined doses of ipilimumab and nivolumab.

RESULTS

Phase I (n = 9)-the maximum tolerated dose of trabectedin was 1.2 mg/m²; Phase II (n = 79)-6 complete responses, 14 partial responses, 49 stable disease, 25.3% best response rate, 87.3% disease control rate; median progression-free survival, 6.7 months (CI 95%: 4.4-7.9), median overall survival, 24.6 months (CI 95%: 17.0-.); Grade 3/4 therapy-related adverse events (n = 92)-increased ALT (25%), fatigue (8.7%), increased AST (8.7%), decreased neutrophil count (5.4%) and anemia (4.6%).

CONCLUSION

SAINT is a safe and effective first-line treatment for advanced soft tissue sarcoma.

A Phase 1/2 Trial Combining Avelumab and Trabectedin for Advanced Liposarcoma and Leiomyosarcoma

PURPOSE

Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) and liposarcoma (LPS) frequently express PD-L1 but are generally resistant to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition (ICI). Trabectedin is FDA-approved for LMS and LPS. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of trabectedin with anti-PD-L1 antibody avelumab in patients with advanced LMS and LPS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A single-arm, open-label, Phase 1/2 study tested avelumab with trabectedin for advanced LMS and LPS. The phase I portion evaluated safety and feasibility of trabectedin (1, 1.2 and 1.5 mg/m2) with avelumab at standard dosing. Primary endpoint of the phase II portion was objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1. Correlative studies included T-cell receptor sequencing (TCRseq), multiplex immunohistochemistry, and tumor gene expression.

RESULTS

33 patients were evaluable; 24 with LMS (6 uterine and 18 non-uterine) and 11 with LPS. In Phase 1, dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed in 2 of 6 patients at both trabectedin 1.2 and 1.5 mg/m2. The recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) was 1.0 mg/m2 trabectedin and 800 mg avelumab. Of 23 patients evaluable at RP2D, three (13%) had partial response (PR), ten (43%) had stable disease (SD) as best response. 6-month PFS was 52%; median PFS was 8.3 months. Patients with PR had higher Simpson Clonality score on TCRseq from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) versus those with SD (0.182 vs 0.067, p = 0.02) or PD (0.182 vs 0.064, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the trial did not meet the primary ORR endpoint, PFS compared favorably to prior studies of trabectedin warranting further investigation.

Multidisciplinary Management of Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: Diagnosis, Prognostic Factors and Treatment

Simple Summary

The management of retroperitoneal sarcomas can be challenging due to the variety of their presentation, histopathological types, and behaviours. This literature review provides a comprehensive and practical overview of the management of retroperitoneal sarcomas, focusing on diagnostic challenges, prognostic factors, multidisciplinary aspects of treatment and new research perspectives.

Abstract

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are rare cancers whose management can be challenging due to various presentation patterns, multiple organ involvement, and a high local and distant recurrence rate. Histopathology and prognostic factors analysis are essential to predict the behaviour of the disease and plan the best therapeutic strategy. To date, surgery is still the main therapeutic option that guarantees a chance of cure from the primary disease. While chemotherapy and radiotherapy seem to be good options for controlling metastatic and recurrent irresectable disease, their role in the treatment of primary RPS remains unclear. This literature review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the multidisciplinary aspects of RPS management in high-volume centres, summarising the diagnostic path, the prognostic factors, and the most suitable therapeutic options.

Contributions of Real-World Evidence and Real-World Data to Decision-Making in the Management of Soft Tissue Sarcomas

Real-world data are defined as data relating to any aspect of a patient's health status collected in the context of routine health surveillance and medical care delivery. Sources range from insurance billing claims through to electronic surveillance data (e.g., activity trackers). Real-world data derive from large populations in diverse clinical settings and thus can be extrapolated more readily than clinical trial data to patients in different clinical settings or with a variety of comorbidities. Real-world data are used to generate real-world evidence, which might be regarded as a "meta-analysis" of accumulated real-world data. Increasingly, regulatory authorities are recognizing the value of real-world data and real-world evidence, especially for rare diseases where it may be practically unfeasible to conduct randomized controlled trials. However, the quality of real-world evidence depends on the quality of the data collected which, in turn, depends on a correct pathological diagnosis and the homogeneous behaviour of a reliably defined and consistent disease entity. As each of the more than 80 varieties of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) types represents a distinct disease entity, the situation is exceedingly complicated. Discordant diagnoses, which affect data quality, present a major challenge for use of real-world data. As real-world data are difficult to collect, collaboration across sarcoma reference institutions and sophisticated information technology solutions are required before the potential of real-world evidence to inform decision-making in the management of STS can be fully exploited.

Outcomes of Patients with Sarcoma and COVID-19 Infection: A Single Institution Cohort Analysis

Outcomes for patients (pts) with sarcoma and COVID-19 are unknown. This is a single institution retrospective study of adults with sarcoma and COVID-19. Ten pts [median age 60 (range 24-69)] were identified. Five were hospitalized; two died from COVID-19 complications; another died from sarcoma. Time between last systemic treatment dose and COVID-19 diagnosis was 6-41 days in pts who died. 5 underwent prior radiation (RT); time between RT and COVID-19 diagnosis was 20-62 days for pts who died. All three pts with WBC differential data (two died) were lymphopenic. Efforts to capture outcomes for a larger cohort are urgently needed.

Tropomyosin receptor kinase inhibitors in the management of sarcomas

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Genetic aberrations resulting in tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) fusion proteins can drive oncogenesis and are postulated to occur in up to 1% of solid tumours. However, TRK fusions in adult sarcomas are rare and there is a significant challenge in identifying patients with sarcomas harbouring TRK fusions in the clinical setting. Despite a recent European Society of Medical Oncology consensus article regarding screening of tumours for TRK fusions, economical and practical limitations present a barrier to widespread screening of sarcomas.

RECENT FINDINGS

Larotrectinib and entrectinib are pan-TRK inhibitors which have both received FDA approval for the management of solid tumours harbouring NTRK fusions. Initial results of a number of clinical trials have demonstrated promising efficacy and safety data, including dramatic and durable responses in patients with sarcomas. As such, TRK inhibitors represent a promising treatment option in a small cohort of adult sarcoma patients, where currently treatment options are limited. The emergence of acquired resistance is a concern associated with TRK inhibitor therapy and a number of second-generation agents targeting TRK kinase mutations driving acquired resistance have entered early-phase clinical trials.

SUMMARY

With the growing appreciation of the implications of TRK fusions, this review will summarize the emerging clinical trial data of TRK inhibitors in sarcomas. Although in their infancy, clinical trial results are encouraging, and as further results and analyses are released, we will have a greater understanding of their impact on clinical practice and the management of patients with sarcomas.

Long-term Outcomes for Extraskeletal Myxoid Chondrosarcoma: A SEER Database Analysis

BACKGROUND

Extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma (EMCS) is a rare tumor that typically has an indolent course but high rate of recurrence. We queried the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to assess factors associated with metastasis, treatment, and survival.

METHODS

We queried the SEER 1973-2016 database for patients with myxoid chondrosarcoma (ICD-O-3: 9231/3). Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazard models assessed effects on overall survival (OS) of demographics and clinical characteristics. Logistic regression assessed associations between tumor location and distant disease. Primary analysis was a complete case analysis; multiple imputation (MI) was used in a sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

Locoregional disease (LRD) was found in 373 (85%) of patients. In univariate analysis with LRD, surgery correlated with superior OS [HR = 0.27; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.16-0.47]; chemotherapy and radiotherapy associated with inferior OS (HR = 1.90; 95% CI, 1.11-3.27 and HR = 1.45; 95% CI, 1.03-2.06, respectively). No treatment modality associated with OS in the adjusted, complete case model. In the adjusted sensitivity analysis, surgery associated with superior outcomes (HR = 0.36; 95% CI, 0.19-0.69). There was no OS difference by primary tumor site. 10-year OS with distant disease was 10% (95% CI, 2%-25%).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery in LRD associated with improved OS in univariate analysis and adjusted models correcting for missing data. There was no OS benefit with chemotherapy or radiotherapy.

IMPACT

This represents the largest report of EMCS with long-term follow-up. Despite the reputedly indolent nature of EMCS, outcomes with metastatic disease are poor. We provide OS benchmarks and guidance for stratification in future prospective trials.

Patient and Oncologist Preferences for the Treatment of Adults with Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Discrete Choice Experiment

BACKGROUND

There has been no single standard-of-care treatment of patients with advanced/metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS). This study was designed to understand patient and oncologist preferences in the advanced/metastatic setting.

METHODS

Adult patients diagnosed with STS and oncologists treating patients with STS completed discrete choice experiment surveys. Study participants chose between pairs of hypothetical treatment profiles for advanced STS characterized by varying levels of overall survival (14, 20, or 26 months), progression-free survival (3, 5, or 7 months), objective tumor response rate (12, 18, or 26%), risk of hospitalization due to side effects (12, 30, or 46%), and days/month to administer treatment (1, 2, or 4 days). A hierarchical Bayes model was used to estimate preferences and relative importance of attributes.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients (23.7% male, mean age 52.8 years) and 160 oncologists (73.8% male, mean 16.9 years in practice) completed the surveys. Among patients, overall survival had the highest relative importance (39.5%, standard deviation [SD] 18.2%), followed by response rate (21.2%, SD 10.4%), and hospitalization (19.8%, SD 12.5%). Among oncologists, overall survival had the highest relative importance (44.6%, SD 16.0%), followed by hospitalization (18.4%, SD 8.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Both patients with STS and oncologists preferred a treatment that maximizes the life of patients while avoiding hospitalizations.

Treatment Patterns and Healthcare Resource Utilization among Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma in US Community Practices

INTRODUCTION

This study was designed to describe demographic and clinical characteristics of patients diagnosed with advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and to examine treatment and healthcare resource utilization patterns of this patient population in a United States (US) community-based oncology practice setting over time.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective observational study was conducted within the US Oncology Network (USON). Patients were eligible if they were diagnosed with advanced or metastatic STS and were treated at a USON site between 01 July 2015 and 31 August 2018. Demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics were described for the overall study population. Comparisons between patients by time period (prior to and after October 2016) were evaluated using the T test for continuous variables and chi-squared test for categorical variables. Data were available for analysis through 31 August 2018.

RESULTS

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the eligible study cohort (N = 376) were similar between patients who initiated treatment before and after October 2016 (all p > 0.05). Forty-three unique regimens were observed in the first-line setting, with the predominant regimen (gemcitabine + docetaxel) received by 33.2% (n = 125) patients. Prior to October 2016, 45.4% of patients received first-line gemcitabine + docetaxel, while 29.0% received this regimen after October 2016.

CONCLUSIONS

While demographic and clinical characteristics were similar, treatment patterns changed in 2016. Future research should evaluate the impact of changing drug approvals and clinical trial results on future treatment patterns.

Management of metastatic retroperitoneal sarcoma: a consensus approach from the Trans-Atlantic Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group (TARPSWG)

Introduction

Retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) is a rare disease accounting for 0.1%-0.2% of all malignancies. Management of RPS is complex and requires multidisciplinary, tailored treatment strategies at all stages, but especially in the context of metastatic or multifocal recurrent disease. Due to the rarity and heterogeneity of this family of diseases, the literature to guide management is limited.

Methods

The Trans-Atlantic Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group (TARPSWG) is an international collaboration of sarcoma experts from all disciplines convened in an effort to overcome these limitations. The TARPSWG has compiled the available evidence surrounding metastatic and multifocally recurrent RPS along with expert opinion in an iterative process to generate a consensus document regarding the complex management of this disease. The objective of this document is to guide sarcoma specialists from all disciplines in the diagnosis and treatment of multifocal recurrent or metastatic RPS.

Results

All aspects of patient assessment, diagnostic processes, local and systemic treatments, and palliation are reviewed in this document, and consensus recommendations provided accordingly. Recommendations were guided by available evidence, in conjunction with expert opinion where evidence was lacking.

Conclusions

This consensus document combines the available literature regarding the management of multifocally recurrent or metastastic RPS with the practical expertise of high-volume sarcoma centers from multiple countries. It is designed as a tool for decision making in the complex multidisciplinary management of this condition and is expected to standardize management across centers, thereby ensuring that patients receive the highest quality care.

Retrospective analysis of treatment patterns among recurrent/metastatic soft tissue sarcoma patients who consulted medical oncologists in Japan

BACKGROUND

Many new antitumor drugs to treat soft tissue sarcoma (STS) were approved in the 2010's, and the need for the management of STS patients by medical oncologists has been increasing. Clinical data about the patterns of treatment of STS patients by medical oncologists in Japan are lacking.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of STS patients who consulted the Department of Medical Oncology at the Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research between August 2012 and March 2017. The STS patients who received any systemic chemotherapy at the Department of Medical Oncology were enrolled in the analyses. We evaluated the details of the systemic chemotherapies used: treatment regimens, drugs, and treatment settings. We focused on the treatment lines and the prognoses of salvage chemotherapy administered for recurrent and/or metastatic STS patients.

RESULTS

Among the 273 patients who consulted the Department of Medical Oncology, 185 patients (68%) received some systemic chemotherapy; 20 patients received chemotherapy as definitive and/or in a perioperative setting, and 171 patients in a salvage setting. The median overall survival of the 171 recurrent and/or metastatic STS patients who received salvage chemotherapy was 14.1 months (95%CI: 10.4-17.8), and the median number of salvage chemotherapy treatment lines throughout their follow-up periods was two lines (range 1-9).

CONCLUSION

About two-thirds of the STS patients who consulted a medical oncologist underwent chemotherapy. In the recurrent and/or metastatic settings, newly approved drugs such as pazopanib were frequently used, and the prognoses of the STS patients treated by medical oncologists were similar to those reported in recent global clinical trials. For the better management of patients with STS, medical oncologists should contribute to the management as multidisciplinary team members.

How we use pazopanib in treating soft-tissue sarcoma: experience at our multidisciplinary sarcoma centers

OBJECTIVE

Soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs) are rare malignant tumors arising from tissues of mesenchymal origin throughout the body with poor prognosis in advanced disease. This commentary describes the current treatment landscape for patients with advanced STS undergoing chemotherapy as well as how pazopanib, a newer multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has been incorporated into treatment for different subtypes of STS in our clinical practice.

METHODS

PubMed was searched (2010-2015) for articles involving the treatment and management of advanced STS. Key search terms included "soft tissue sarcoma", "pazopanib", "chemotherapy", "doxorubicin", "ifosfamide", "trabectedin" and "gemcitabine". Additionally, ClinicalTrials.gov was searched to identify ongoing studies evaluating pazopanib in STS. Reference citations within relevant articles revealed further sources of value.

RESULTS

Standard treatment for advanced STS is single agent or combination systemic chemotherapy. The efficacy of these treatments varies widely, likely because of tumor heterogeneity and cellular mechanisms of chemoresistance, and adverse effects may be a limiting factor for combination therapy. Pazopanib, approved for the treatment of advanced STS in patients who received prior chemotherapy, has demonstrated clinical benefit in a variety of histologic types of advanced STS where the prognosis is often poor. While pazopanib has a favorable safety profile compared with commonly prescribed chemotherapies, it has several safety concerns and dose-limiting adverse effects. We share our best practice for managing adverse events to ensure patient tolerability.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of pazopanib increases the treatment options available to control advanced STS, with management of adverse events through close monitoring, patient education and treatment as necessary.

Detection of driver mutations in BRAF can aid in diagnosis and early treatment of dedifferentiated metastatic melanoma

Dedifferentiated metastatic melanoma can pose a significant diagnostic challenge, especially if the history of primary melanoma is not known or is remote. BRAF and NRAS mutations are common melanoma driver mutations that are usually sequenced to evaluate for treatment targets. We evaluated whether BRAF and NRAS mutational testing could contribute to the diagnosis of dedifferentiated metastatic melanoma when immunostains are negative. Seven patients with melanoma who had an additional diagnosis of poorly differentiated sarcoma with negative melanocytic immunostains were tested for BRAF and NRAS mutations. Three patients showed identical BRAF mutations in the melanoma and the poorly differentiated sarcoma and hence were re-classified as metastatic dedifferentiated melanoma. In these three patients, there was an average delay of 7 months before appropriate testing, workup and treatment for metastatic melanoma was initiated. Two of these patients currently have stable metastatic disease and show sustained therapeutic response to melanoma-specific treatment including BRAF inhibitors. BRAF mutational analysis should therefore be considered in cases of poorly differentiated sarcoma, especially if there is a known history of melanoma or with unusual localization of disease. The administration of melanoma-specific treatments in such dedifferentiated cases can show therapeutic response, highlighting the importance of rendering accurate diagnoses on such cases.

Middle East observational study in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: an epidemiological study on the treatment patterns (MOON)

PURPOSE

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a heterogeneous group of rare mesenchymal neoplasms, accounting for < 1% of all newly diagnosed malignancies. These tumors can occur in almost any anatomic site though they most frequently occur in the extremities. The objective of the study was to describe the epidemiology, treatment paradigm, and real-world outcomes in the clinical management of metastatic STS (mSTS) in the Middle East and North Africa (MEA) region.

METHODS

MOON was an observational, multicenter, retrospective patient chart review study which included 200 patients with mSTS in the final analysis. The primary objective of the study is exploratory, so it is presented using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

At the time of presentation, 62.0% patients had metastatic disease, 27.5% had received only their primary diagnosis and 10.0% had experienced a local recurrence. The most frequent STS localizations were lower extremities (74%), trunk (28.5%) and upper extremities (10.5%). Primary tumor was staged as T2b in the majority (60%) of patients. Surgical treatment was performed most often for the primary disease, whereas radiation therapy and chemotherapy were predominantly administered with palliative intent. A total of 38 patients received treatment with pazopanib. Thirteen adverse events (AEs) were attributed to pazopanib in eight patients.

CONCLUSION

Adult patients treated for STS have al most equal gender ratio and mostly are middle aged. The majority of patients have metastatic disease and disease progression, and half of the patients died from the disease during the period of evaluation. This study obtained real-life data on the clinical management of STS in MEA countries which could be shared with the medical community.

Treatment Patterns and Survival among Adult Patients with Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Retrospective Medical Record Review in the United Kingdom, Spain, Germany, and France

Objective

To describe real-world treatment patterns and outcomes for patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) not amenable to surgery or radiotherapy in the United Kingdom, Spain, Germany, and France.

Methods

Physicians completed a web-based medical record abstraction for adult patients with advanced STS (other than Kaposi's sarcoma or gastrointestinal stromal tumor) who received ≥1 line of systemic therapy. Clinical characteristics, treatments, tumor responses, and mortality data were recorded.

Results

A total of 130 physicians provided data for 807 patients. Patients' mean age at advanced STS diagnosis was 57.1 (±12.3) years; 59% were male. The most commonly identified histologic categories were leiomyosarcoma (28%), liposarcoma (13%), and rhabdomyosarcoma (11%). Overall, 57% of patients received only 1 line of therapy, 32% received 2 lines of therapy, and 11% received ≥3 lines of therapy. The most common first-line regimens were doxorubicin alone (41%), doxorubicin plus ifosfamide (19%), docetaxel plus gemcitabine (9%), paclitaxel alone (4%), and ifosfamide (4%). Median overall survival from start of treatment was estimated to be 17.6 months (95% confidence interval, 15.6–19.0 months).

Conclusions

In real-world clinical practice, advanced STS is most commonly treated with older therapies in the United Kingdom, Spain, Germany, and France. New therapies that improve overall survival in advanced STS are needed.

Treatment patterns and survival among older adults in the United States with advanced soft-tissue sarcomas

Background

To describe patient and tumor characteristics, treatments, and survival among older adults in the United States with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma (STS), across and by categories of specifically defined histologic subtypes.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using the SEER. The study population comprised patients ≥ 65 years old with advanced STS (excluding osteosarcoma, Kaposi sarcoma, and gastrointestinal stromal tumors) diagnosed from January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2011.

Results

Of 4274 study patients, 2103 (49.2%) were male. Mean age was 77.8 years, and 1539 (36.0%) had distant disease at initial diagnosis. The most common histologic categories were leiomyosarcoma (922[21.6%]), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (652[15.3%]), and liposarcoma (554[13.0%]). Overall, 1227 (28.7%) patients received first-line systemic therapy. Among these patients, 325 (26.5%) received docetaxel plus gemcitabine and 231 (18.8%) received doxorubicin alone. Only 476 patients received second-line therapy (11.1%), most commonly doxorubicin alone (n = 101). Median overall survival (95% confidence interval) from advanced STS diagnosis was 8.9 (8.3, 9.7) months.

Conclusions

Although previous studies of younger populations reported anthracycline-based therapy predominated in first line, our study of older advanced STS patients found that docetaxel plus gemcitabine was most commonly used. Despite variation by histologic category, prognosis remains poor for older adult patients with advanced STS.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13569-018-0094-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A retrospective cohort study of treatment patterns among patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma in the US

Background

Since treatment patterns in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (mSTS) have not been studied subsequent to US approval of pazopanib in 2012, this study sought to examine mSTS treatment patterns by line of therapy, including regimen and duration of therapy.

Methods

This retrospective study employed administrative claims from a large US health plan from 1/2006–9/2015. Adult mSTS patients were required to have an NCCN-recommended therapy and be continuously enrolled in the health plan during the study period. The most frequent regimens for distinct lines of therapy (LOT) were assessed. Sensitivity analyses evaluated changes to study findings using two alternate medical and pharmacy claims diagnostic algorithms to define the STS study population.

Results

Among 555 patients with mSTS, mean age was 59 years and 54% were male. During the study period, 41% of patients initiated ≥ 2 LOTs; 16% had ≥ 3 LOTs and 5% had ≥ 4 LOTs. Docetaxel + gemcitabine was most common in LOT1, pazopanib in LOT2 and LOT3, and doxorubicin in LOT4. The five most common LOT1 regimens represented 53% of patients; among the remaining 47%, the most common regimen represented < 6% of patients. Among patients with pazopanib in LOT2 and LOT3, the most common prior regimen was docetaxel + gemcitabine (47% and 30% respectively). Kaplan–Meier estimation of median treatment duration overall for LOT1 was 3.5 months, while for LOT2 and LOT3, median treatment duration was 2.9 and 3.3 months, respectively. For both sensitivity analyses, patient demographic and clinical characteristics were similar to the original study population, and the five most frequently used regimens in LOT1 and LOT2 were similar among the three populations regardless of the population selection criteria employed.

Conclusion

Choice of regimen by LOT among patients with mSTS is varied; < 65% of patients in any LOT received the five most common regimens. Pazopanib, the only approved targeted therapy, is primarily used in second and later lines of therapy and is mostly given post docetaxel + gemcitabine.

Feasibility and clinical value of CT-guided 125I brachytherapy for metastatic soft tissue sarcoma after first-line chemotherapy failure

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility and usefulness of computed tomography (CT)-guided iodine¹²⁵ (¹²⁵I) brachytherapy for patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) after first-line chemotherapy failure.

METHODS

We recruited 93 patients with metastatic STS who had received first-line chemotherapy 4-6 times but developed progressive disease, from January 2010 to July 2015; 45 patients who had combined ¹²⁵I brachytherapy and second-line chemotherapy (Group A), and 48 patients who received second-line CT only (Group B).

RESULT

In Group A, 49 ¹²⁵I seed implantation procedures were performed in 45 patients with 116 metastatic lesions; the primary success rate was 91.1% (41/45), without life-threatening complications. Local control rates at 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months were 71.1%, 62.2%, 46.7%, 28.9% and 11.1% for Group A, and 72.9%, 54.2%, 18.8%, 6.3% and 0% for Group B. Mean progression-free survival differed significantly (Group A: 7.1±1.3 months; Group B: 3.6 ±1.1 months; P<0.001; Cox proportional hazards regression analysis), but overall survival did not significantly differ (Group A: 16.9 ±5.1 months; Group B: 12.1 ± 4.8 months). Group A showed better symptom relief and quality of life than Group B.

CONCLUSION

CT-guided ¹²⁵I brachytherapy is a feasible and valuable treatment for patients with metastatic STS.

KEY POINTS

• ¹²⁵ I brachytherapy is feasible and valuable for treating metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. • ¹²⁵ I brachytherapy represents a prominent activity in disease control. • ¹²⁵ I brachytherapy can achieve better symptom relief and quality of life.

Treatment patterns and survival in an exhaustive French cohort of pazopanib-eligible patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS)

BACKGROUND

The French EMS study prospectively collected exhaustive data from STS patients diagnosed in the Rhone-Alpes region from 2005 to 07.

METHODS

The database included diagnosis/histology, surgery, radiotherapy, systemic treatments and treatment response. Treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with metastatic disease, excluding adipocytic sarcoma and GIST were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 888 total patients, 145 were included based on having metastatic disease and appropriate subtypes. All patients received treatment with systemic therapy being most common (74%, n = 107), followed by radiotherapy (30%, n = 44) and surgery (23%, n = 33). Doxorubicin, alone or in combination, was the most common first line systemic therapy (65%, n = 46). Drugs without license in sarcoma were used in 38-83% of treatments depending on treatment line. 24% of frontline patients demonstrated an objective response, decreasing to 11% objective responses in second line but no responses were documented beyond second line, with median PFS declining with each additional line. Median PFS also declined in patients receiving surgery compared to those receiving no surgery (8-15 m vs 5 m). Median OS from metastatic diagnosis for patients receiving systemic therapy was double that of patients without systemic treatment (24 m vs 12 m, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes in this population were poor and declined with successive treatment. However, results suggest that further anticancer therapies in recurrent sarcoma might be beneficial.

Patterns of care for patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma: experience from Australian sarcoma services

Background

There is a paucity of data on the current management of patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) in the Australian health care setting. This study utilised the Australian sarcoma database to evaluate the patterns of care delivered to patients with advanced STS at Australian sarcoma services.

Methods

Prospectively collected data from six sarcoma centres in Australia were sourced to identify patients diagnosed with advanced STS between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2012. Descriptive statistics were analysed for patient demographics, clinicopathological characteristics and treatment patterns. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier product limit method.

Results

Of 253 patients with advanced STS, four major STS subtypes were identified: undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (23 %), leiomyosarcoma (17 %), liposarcoma (14 %), and synovial sarcoma (8 %); with the rest grouped as “other STS” (38 %). Approximately one-third of patients received palliative systemic therapy with the most common first-line therapy being doxorubicin alone (50 %). A small percentage of patients participated in clinical trials (20 %). Palliative radiotherapy was utilised mostly for treatment of symptomatic distant metastases and one-third of patients underwent metastasectomy, most commonly for pulmonary metastases. The median overall survival (OS) in this series was 18 months and no significant difference in OS was observed across different STS histological subtypes.

Conclusions

This is the first detailed study outlining patterns of care for Australian patients with advanced STS managed at sarcoma services. These data highlight a particular area of weakness in the lack of clinical trials for sarcoma patients and also serve as an important reference point for understanding how practice may change over time as treatment options evolve.