Combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma (biphenotypic) tumors: clinical characteristics, imaging features of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and computed tomography

Evaluation of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma using CEUS LI-RADS: correlation with pathological characteristics

OBJECTIVE

To explore the factors that influence the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) classification of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-ICC).

METHODS

Between September 2014 to July 2020, the CEUS features of 58 patients with pathologically confirmed cHCC-ICC were retrospectively evaluated and assigned according to the CEUS LI-RADS (version 2017). The pathological characteristics of nodules categorizing as different CEUS LI-RADS categories were compared. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore potential factors that may influence the CEUS LI-RADS classification of cHCC-ICC.

RESULTS

According to CEUS LI-RADS, 32.8% (19/58), 63.8% (37/58), and 3.4% (2/58) were categorized as LR-5, LR-M, and LR-TIV, respectively. There was significant difference between the LR-M and LR-5 groups with regard to the pathological grade, nodule size, and HCC/ICC-component ratio of cHCC-ICC. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified tumor size and the relative proportions of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (ICC) components as the independent influencing factors.

CONCLUSION

Tumor size and the relative proportion of HCC and ICC components within the nodule had a significant impact on the CEUS LI-RADS classification of cHCC-ICC.

Treatments and prognostic outcomes of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma with distant metastasis: an analysis based on SEER data

Background

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) is a rare liver cancer with a poor prognosis, often diagnosed at an advanced stage. The management of cHCC-CCA with distant metastasis remains challenging, and prognostic factors are not well-defined. This study aimed to investigate prognostic factors and treatment outcomes for cHCC-CCA patients with distant metastasis.

Methods

Retrospective analysis was conducted using data from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients with distant metastasis [stage M1, according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th edition] between January 2010 and December 2020 were included. Their characteristics, clinical profiles, and prognostic information were evaluated. Cox multifactorial survival analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used for statistical analysis.

Results

A total of 130 patients were included, with 78 (60%) receiving chemotherapy. Cox multivariate survival analysis revealed worse prognosis for Black individuals compared to White individuals (P<0.05). The median overall survival was 2 months for Black patients and 5 months for White patients. Chemotherapy significantly improved patient prognosis (P<0.05), while lung metastasis emerged as an independent risk factor (P<0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival curves confirmed the impact of lung metastasis and chemotherapy on overall survival. Patients with lung metastasis had lower survival rates (P<0.05), and those receiving chemotherapy had higher survival rates (P<0.05). Subgroup analysis based on age showed lower survival rates in patients aged 75 years or older compared to those below 75 years. Chemotherapy showed significant beneficial effects on the prognosis of patients below 75 years old, but no significant difference was observed in patients aged 75 years or above.

Conclusions

Chemotherapy improves the prognosis of cHCC-CCA patients with distant metastasis, especially for those under 75 years old. Black race and lung metastasis are poor prognostic factors.

A machine-learning model based on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for preoperative differentiation between hepatocellular carcinoma and combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma

AIM

To establish a machine-learning model based on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to differentiate combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) before surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical and MRI data of 194 patients with histopathologically diagnosed cHCC-CC (n=52) or HCC (n=142) were analysed retrospectively. ITK-SNAP software was used to delineate three-dimensional (3D) lesions and extract high-throughput features. Feature selection was carried out based on Pearson's correlation coefficient and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis. A radiomics model (radiomics features), a clinical model (i.e., clinical-image features), and a fusion model (i.e., radiomics features + clinical-image features) were established using six machine-learning classifiers. The performance of each model in distinguishing between cHCC-CC and HCC was evaluated with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity.

RESULTS

Significant differences in liver cirrhosis, tumour number, shape, edge, peritumoural enhancement in the arterial phase, and lipid were identified between cHCC-CC and HCC patients (p<0.05). The AUC of the fusion model based on logistic regression was 0.878 (95% CI: 0.766-0.949) in the arterial phase in the test set, and the sensitivity/specificity was 0.844/0.714; however, the AUC of the clinical and radiomics models was 0.759 (95% CI: 0.663-0.861) and 0.838 (95% CI: 0.719-0.921) in the test set, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The fusion model based on DCE-MRI in the arterial phase can significantly improve the diagnostic rate of cHCC-CC and HCC as compared with conventional approaches.

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma: from genesis to molecular pathways and therapeutic strategies

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are the most common primary liver cancers. Little is known about the combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-ICC) variant and the proper therapeutic strategies. Out of over 1200 available studies about cHCC-ICC, we selected the most representative ones that reflected updated information with application to individualized therapy. Based on literature data and own experience, we hypothesize that two molecular groups of cHCC-ICC can be identified. The proposed division might have a significant therapeutic role. Most cases develop, like HCC, on a background of cirrhosis and hepatitis and share characteristics with HCC; thus, they are named HCC-type cHCC-ICC and therapeutic strategies might be like those for HCC. This review also highlights a new carcinogenic perspective and identifies, based on literature data and the own experience, a second variant of cHCC-ICC called ICC-type cHCC-ICC. Contrary to HCC, these cases show a tendency for lymph node metastases and ICC components in the metastatic tissues. No guidelines have been established yet for such cases. Individualized therapy should be, however, oriented toward the immunoprofile of the primary tumor and metastatic cells, and different therapeutic strategies should be used in patients with HCC- versus ICC-type cHCC-ICC.

Cholangiocarcinoma imaging: from diagnosis to response assessment

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), a highly aggressive primary liver cancer arising from the bile duct epithelium, represents a substantial proportion of hepatobiliary malignancies, posing formidable challenges in diagnosis and treatment. Notably, the global incidence of intrahepatic CCA has seen a rise, necessitating a critical examination of diagnostic and management strategies, especially due to presence of close imaging mimics such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA). Hence, it is imperative to understand the role of various imaging modalities such as ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), elucidating their strengths, and limitations in diagnostic precision and staging accuracy. Beyond conventional approaches, there is emerging significance of functional imaging tools including positron emission tomography (PET)-CT and diffusion-weighted (DW)-MRI, providing pivotal insights into diagnosis, therapeutic assessment, and prognostic evaluation. This comprehensive review explores the risk factors, classification, clinical features, and role of imaging in the holistic spectrum of diagnosis, staging, management, and restaging for CCA, hence serving as a valuable resource for radiologists evaluating CCA.

Current advances and future directions in combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma

The low incidence of combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) is an important factor limiting research progression. Our study extensively included nearly three decades of relevant literature and assembled the most comprehensive database comprising 5,742 patients with cHCC-CCA. We summarized the characteristics, tumor markers, and clinical features of these patients. Additionally, we present the evolution of cHCC-CCA classification and explain the underlying rationale for these classification standards. We reviewed cHCC-CCA diagnostic advances using imaging features, tumor markers, and postoperative pathology, as well as treatment options such as surgical, adjuvant, and immune-targeted therapies. In addition, recent advances in more effective chemotherapeutic regimens and immune-targeted therapies were explored. Furthermore, we described the molecular mutation features and potential specific markers of cHCC-CCA. The prognostic value of Nestin has been proven, and we speculate that Nestin will also play a role in classification and diagnosis. However, further research is needed. Moreover, we believe that the possibility of using machine learning liquid biopsy for preoperative diagnosis and establishing a scoring system are directions for future research.

Implications of ultrasound-based deep learning model for preoperatively differentiating combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

The current study developed an ultrasound-based deep learning model to make preoperative differentiation among hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), and combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-ICC).

METHODS

The B-mode ultrasound images of 465 patients with primary liver cancer were enrolled in model construction, comprising 264 HCCs, 105 ICCs, and 96 cHCC-ICCs, of which 50 cases were randomly selected to form an independent test cohort, and the rest of study population was assigned to a training and validation cohorts at the ratio of 4:1. Four deep learning models (Resnet18, MobileNet, DenseNet121, and Inception V3) were constructed, and the fivefold cross-validation was adopted to train and validate the performance of these models. The following indexes were calculated to determine the differential diagnosis performance of the models, including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), F-1 score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) based on images in the independent test cohort.

RESULTS

Based on the fivefold cross-validation, the Resnet18 outperformed other models in terms of accuracy and robustness, with the overall training and validation accuracy as 99.73% (± 0.07%) and 99.35% (± 0.53%), respectively. Furthers validation based on the independent test cohort suggested that Resnet 18 yielded the best diagnostic performance in identifying HCC, ICC, and cHCC-ICC, with the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, NPV, F1-score, and AUC of 84.59%, 92.65%, 86.00%, 85.82%, 92.99%, 92.37%, 85.07%, and 0.9237 (95% CI 0.8633, 0.9840).

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound-based deep learning algorithm appeared a promising diagnostic method for identifying cHCC-ICC, HCC, and ICC, which might play a role in clinical decision making and evaluation of prognosis.

Benefit and harm of waiting time in liver transplantation for HCC

Liver transplantation is the most successful treatment for limited-stage HCC. The waiting time for liver transplantation (LT) can be a critical factor affecting the oncological prognosis and outcome of patients with HCC. Efficient strategies to optimize waiting time are essential to maximize the benefits of LT and to reduce the harm of delay in transplantation. The ever-increasing demand for donor livers emphasizes the need to improve the organization of the waiting list for transplantation and to optimize organ availability for patients with and without HCC. Current progress in innovations to expand the donor pool includes the implementation of living donor LT and the use of grafts from extended donors. By expanding selection criteria, an increased number of patients are eligible for transplantation, which necessitates criteria to prevent futile transplantations. Thus, the selection criteria for LT have evolved to include not only tumor characteristics but biomarkers as well. Enhancing our understanding of HCC tumor biology through the analysis of subtypes and molecular genetics holds significant promise in advancing the personalized approach for patients. In this review, the effect of waiting time duration on outcome in patients with HCC enlisted for LT is discussed.

Radiomics Based on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Preoperative Differentiation of Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma from Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multi-Center Study

Purpose

To explore whether texture features based on magnetic resonance can distinguish diseases combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) before operation.

Methods

The clinical baseline data and MRI information of 342 patients with pathologically diagnosed cHCC-CC and HCC in two medical centers were collected. The data were divided into the training set and the test set at a ratio of 7:3. MRI images of tumors were segmented with ITK-SNAP software, and python open-source platform was used for texture analysis. Logistic regression as the base model, mutual information (MI) and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression were used to select the most favorable features. The clinical, radiomics, and clinic-radiomics model were constructed based on logistic regression. The model's effectiveness was comprehensively evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and Youden index which is the main, and the model results were exported by SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).

Results

A total of 23 features were included. Among all models, the arterial phase-based clinic-radiomics model showed the best performance in differentiating cHCC-CC from HCC before an operation, with the AUC of the test set being 0.863 (95% CI: 0.782 to 0.923), the specificity and sensitivity being 0.918 (95% CI: 0.819 to 0.973) and 0.738 (95% CI: 0.580 to 0.861), respectively. SHAP value results showed that the RMS was the most important feature affecting the model.

Conclusion

Clinic-radiomics model based on DCE-MRI may be useful to distinguish cHCC-CC from HCC in a preoperative setting, especially in the arterial phase, and RMS has the greatest impact.

Non-invasive imaging in the diagnosis of combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) is a rare type of primary liver cancer. It is a complex "biphenotypic" tumor type consisting of bipotential hepatic progenitor cells that can differentiate into cholangiocytes subtype and hepatocytes subtype. The prognosis of patients with cHCC-CC is quite poor with its specific and more aggressive nature. Furthermore, there are no definite demographic or clinical features of cHCC-CC, thus a clear preoperative identification and accurate non-invasive imaging diagnostic analysis of cHCC-CC are of great value. In this review, we first summarized the epidemiological features, pathological findings, molecular biological information and serological indicators of cHCC-CC disease. Then we reviewed the important applications of non-invasive imaging modalities-particularly ultrasound (US)-in cHCC-CC, covering both diagnostic and prognostic assessment of patients with cHCC-CC. Finally, we presented the shortcomings and potential outlooks for imaging studies in cHCC-CC.

Combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma with a predominant HCC component: better survival and MRI-based prediction

OBJECTIVES

To determine the optimal cutoff value of HCC% for predicting the outcome of patients with combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) and to investigate how preoperative MR features based on the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS ver. 2018) are related to the HCC% in cHCC-CCA.

METHODS

The study enrolled 107 patients pathologically confirmed to have single cHCC-CCA according to the 2019 WHO classification. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to find the optimal cutoff value of HCC% based on overall survival (OS). The preoperative MR imaging features and clinicopathological findings were retrospectively evaluated and compared between the high HCC% and low HCC% groups.

RESULTS

In total, 107 patients (mean age, males vs. females: 56.6 ± 10.7 years vs. 54.2 ± 12.8 years) were evaluated. Analysis of the relationship between HCC% and OS by ROC curve suggested that the optimal cutoff value was 65%, by which 51 (47.7%) patients were assigned to the high HCC% group. LI-RADS categorization (OR = 3.657, p = 0.006 vs. OR = 4.075, p = 0.004) and serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) >5 ng/mL (OR = 0.348, p = 0.089 vs. OR = 0.298, p = 0.040) were significant predictors for HCC% in cHCC-CCA in both univariate and multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

cHCC-CCA patients with HCC components higher than 65% tend to exhibit better overall survival, and MRI-based LI-RADS categorization and serum CEA level are valuable for identifying HCC% in cHCC-CCA preoperatively.

KEY POINTS

• cHCC-CCA patients with HCC components higher than 65% tend to exhibit better overall survival. • MRI-based LI-RADS categorization and serum CEA level were significant predictors for HCC% in cHCC-CCA in both univariate and multivariate analyses and valuable for identifying HCC% in cHCC-CCA preoperatively.

Quantitative Assessment of Hypovascular Component in Arterial Phase to Help the Discrimination of Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma and Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Purpose

To explore the imaging performance for discrimination of combined hepatocellular- cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

In total, 35 patients with cHCC-CCA and a matched control group of HCC patients (n = 35) were included retrospectively. We quantitatively evaluated the hypovascular component in tumor and qualitatively assessed LI-RADS features and other aggressive features to develop model for cHCC-CCA diagnose. Subgroup analyses were performed by tumor size and LI-RADS category.

Results

cHCC-CCA frequently showed a larger proportion (≥50%) of hypovascular areas followed by HCC (P = 0.000). Among those patients with ≥50% hypovascular areas, 8 patients did not present rim enhancement in atrial phase. The LI-RADS major features were more commonly observed in HCC (82.9-45.7%,), than cHCC-CCA (P = 0.003-0.022). The targetoid appearances and non-smooth margin frequently appeared in cHCC-CCA (34.3-63.9%), compared with HCC (P = 0.000-0.023). We developed a radiologic model based on ≥50% hypovascular component and delayed enhancement, which presented AUC of 0.821, accuracy of 80%. We also obtained good performance by radiologic model in LR-M group and tumor size <50mm group (AUC: 0.841 and 0.866, respectively). Combined group which included CA 19-9 and ≥50% hypovascular component and delayed enhancement did not improve the distinction performance between cHCC-CCA and HCC, which presented good performance of identifying cHCC-CCA in the LR-4/5 subgroup and tumor size ≥50 mm subgroup (AUC: 0.717, 0.730, respectively). cHCC-CCA group presented heterogeneous dominant pathology involving 15 of HCC, 7 of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) or cholangiolocellular carcinoma (CLC), 13 of intermediate cells component. Macrotrabecular appearances were higher in cHCC-CCA than that in HCC. The proportion of Hepa-1 was significantly higher in true negative (TN) patients (29 [93.5%]) and false negative (FN) patients (10 [100%]) than in true positive (TP) patients (16 [64%]; P = 0.036).

Conclusion

Quantitative assessment of hypovascular component could help the discrimination of cHCC-CCA. Macrotrabecular appearances were more exhibited in cHCC-CCA than that in HCC.

The Diagnostic Approach towards Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma-State of the Art and Future Perspectives

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) is a rare primary liver cancer which displays clinicopathologic features of both hepatocellular (HCC) and cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCA). The similarity to HCC and CCA makes the diagnostic workup particularly challenging. Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) are blood tumour markers related with HCC and CCA, respectively. They can be used as diagnostic markers in cHCC-CCA as well, albeit with low sensitivity. The imaging features of cHCC-CCA overlap with those of HCC and CCA, dependent on the predominant histopathological component. Using the Liver Imaging and Reporting Data System (LI-RADS), as many as half of cHCC-CCAs may be falsely categorised as HCC. This is especially relevant since the diagnosis of HCC may be made without histopathological confirmation in certain cases. Thus, in instances of diagnostic uncertainty (e.g., simultaneous radiological HCC and CCA features, elevation of CA 19-9 and AFP, HCC imaging features and elevated CA 19-9, and vice versa) multiple image-guided core needle biopsies should be performed and analysed by an experienced pathologist. Recent advances in the molecular characterisation of cHCC-CCA, innovative diagnostic approaches (e.g., liquid biopsies) and methods to analyse multiple data points (e.g., clinical, radiological, laboratory, molecular, histopathological features) in an all-encompassing way (e.g., by using artificial intelligence) might help to address some of the existing diagnostic challenges.

Clinical Value Study on Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Combined with Enhanced CT in Early Diagnosis of Primary Hepatic Carcinoma

Objective. To explore the clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with enhanced CT in the early diagnosis of primary hepatic carcinoma (PHC). Methods. 84 patients with suspected PHC in the early stage treated in our hospital from January 2020 to January 2022 were selected as the study subjects. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced ultrasound and enhanced CT examinations, and the surgery was performed for resection of lesions within 1 month. According to the results of postoperative pathology diagnosis, the benign group and the malignant group were included. The case data were viewed for the retrospective study to analyze the clinical application value by evaluating the diagnostic efficiency of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, enhanced CT, and their combination for PHC. Results. Among 84 suspected patients, 70 patients had PHC (malignant group) and 14 patients had other hepatic lesions (benign group) after postoperative histopathological examination. There was no significant difference in age, gender, clinical symptoms, and educational level between the two groups ( $P>0.05$ ), with obvious differences in the history of chronic hepatic disease, smoking, drinking, and infection of hepatitis B virus (HBV) between the two groups ( $P<0.05$ ). The enhancement time and regression time of the two groups were significantly different ( $P<0.05$ ), with no statistical difference in the enhancement pattern of photography ( $P>0.05$ ). For patients with PHC, the imaging features of the two inspection methods at arterial phase and lag phase were statistically different ( $P<0.05$ ). Taking pathologic findings as the gold standard, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of joint diagnosis were significantly higher than those of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and enhanced CT ( $P<0.05$ ), and the area under the curve of joint diagnosis was obviously larger than that of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and enhanced CT by placing the ROC curve for examination ( $P<0.05$ ). Conclusion. The combination of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and enhanced CT has a higher accuracy in the early diagnosis of PHC, and the diagnostic efficiency of contrast-enhanced ultrasound is higher than that of enhanced CT. In clinical practice, the physical condition and state of illness in patients should be fully considered, and the most suitable examination method should be selected to reduce their medical burden by taking into account their economic situation.

Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma: An Update on Pathology and Diagnostic Approach

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) is a rare primary liver carcinoma displaying both hepatocytic and cholangiocytic differentiation within the same tumor. Relative to classic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), cHCC-CCA has more aggressive behavior and a poorer prognosis. Though recent advances have improved our understanding of the biology underlying cHCC-CCAs, they remain diagnostically challenging for pathologists because of their morphologic and phenotypic diversity. Accurate diagnosis of cHCC-CCA is important for patient management and prognostication. Herein, we review recent updates on cHCC-CCA, focusing on tumor classification, pathology, and diagnostic approach.

Prediction of Microvascular Invasion in Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma Based on Pre-operative Clinical Data and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Characteristics

The goal of the study described here was to define the predictive value of pre-operative clinical information and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging characteristics in combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (CHC) patients with microvascular invasion (MVI). Seventy-six patients with pathologically confirmed CHC were enrolled in this study, comprising 18 patients with MVI-positive status and 58 with MVI-negative CHC nodules. The pre-operative clinical data and CEUS imaging features were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the potential predictors of MVI in CHC. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) after hepatectomy was compared between patients with different MVI status using the log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Univariate analysis indicated that the following parameters of patients with CHC significantly differed between the MVI-positive and MVI-negative groups (p<0.05): tumor size, α-fetoprotein ≥400 ng/mL, enhancement patterns in arterial phase and marked washout during the portal venous phase on CEUS. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, only the CEUS characteristics of heterogeneous enhancement (odds ratio = 6.807; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.099, 42.147; p = 0.039) and marked washout (odds ratio = 4.380; 95% CI: 1.050,18.270; p = 0.043) were identified as independent predictors of MVI in CHC. The combination of the two risk factors in predicting MVI achieved a better diagnostic performance than each parameter alone, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.736 (0.622, 0.830). After hepatectomy, CHC patients with MVI exhibited earlier recurrence compared with those without MVI (hazard ratio = 1.859; 95% CI: 0.8699-3.9722, p = 0.046). The CEUS imaging features of heterogeneous enhancement in the arterial phase and marked washout during the portal venous phase were the potential predictors of MVI in CHC. Aside from that, CHC patients with MVI had an earlier recurrence rate than those without MVI after surgery.

Diagnostic value of CEUS LI-RADS and serum tumor markers for combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma

PURPOSE

To analyze the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) manifestations of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (CHC) and to investigate the diagnostic value of the 2017 version of the CEUS Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) and serum tumor markers in CHC.

METHODS

A total of 66 pathologically confirmed CHC nodules were retrospectively analyzed. We summarized the CEUS manifestations of CHC and analyzed the relationship between serum tumor markers and the enhancement pattern of CHC. We also classified CHC according to CEUS LI-RADS criteria. The Kappa test was used to assess the interreader agreement of CEUS LI-RADS between radiologists.

RESULT

According to the results, 52 of 62 (83.9%) patients had elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), 19 of 61 (31.1%) had elevated carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA 199), and 13 of 61 (21.3%) had both elevated AFP and CA 199. Of the 66 CHC nodules, 64 (97.0%) were identified as malignant lesions by CEUS, 13 (19.7%) showed a hepatocellular carcinoma-like enhancement pattern, and 21 (31.8%) showed a cholangiocarcinoma-like enhancement pattern. For the CEUS LI-RADS categories, 39 of 53 (73.6%) CHC nodules were classified as LR-M, 12 (22.6%) were classified as LR-5, and 2 (3.8%) were classified as LR-4. The interreader agreement for the LI-RADS categories was 0.60.

CONCLUSIONS

Although CHC lacks specific CEUS features, CEUS LI-RADS and serum tumor markers can be useful tools for reducing the misdiagnosis of CHC. In addition, due to the relative complexity of the CEUS features involved in CHC, it is necessary for beginning radiologists to learn more about CEUS features.

CEUS and CT/MRI LI-RADS in Association With Serum Biomarkers for Differentiation of Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma From Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background

Combined Hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCAs) are with both unambiguously differentiated hepatocellular and biliary components. cHCC-CCAs show various imaging features similar to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCCs) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICCs), which makes the differential diagnosis between them challenging. The accurate diagnosis of cHCC-CCAs is of great importance in selecting treatment methods and performing patient management.

Purpose

To investigate the diagnostic efficacy of CEUS and CT/MRI LI-RADS in association with tumor biomarkers for differentiation of cHCC-CCAs from HCCs.

Methods

A total of 54 cHCC-CCAs and 55 HCCs in two centers were retrospectively collected. The diagnostic criteria for cHCC-CCAs if one or more of the following conditions were satisfied: (1) arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) on CEUS and LR-M on CT/MRI; (2) LR-5 on both CEUS and CT/MRI with elevated carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9); (3) LR-M on both CEUS and CT/MRI with elevated alphafetoprotein (AFP). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated.

Results

The rates of APHE and Rim-APHE on CEUS in cHCC-CCAs were 81.5% and 9.3%, respectively. The rate of early and marked washout on CEUS in cHCC-CCAs were 59.3% and 27.8%, respectively. 64.8% and 25.9% of cHCC-CCAs showed APHE and Rim-APHE on CT/MRI, respectively. 46.3% and 35.2% of cHCC-CCAs showed washout and delay enhancement on CT/MRI, respectively. The kappa value of LI-RADS categories of cHCC-CCAs on CEUS and CT/MRI was 0.319 (P=0.008). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and AUC of the aforementioned diagnostic criteria for cHCC-CCAs were 64.8%, 84.4%, 76.1% and 0.746, respectively.

Conclusion

The combination of the CEUS and CT/MRI LI-RADS with serum tumor markers shows promising diagnostic performance of cHCC-CCAs.

Preoperative Differentiation of Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma From Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Nomogram Based on Ultrasonographic Features and Clinical Indicators

OBJECTIVE

To establish a predictive nomogram to distinguish combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (CHC) from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) based on preoperative clinical and ultrasound findings.

METHODS

A total of 261 patients with pathologically confirmed primary liver cancers (PLCs) were enrolled in this retrospective study, comprising 87 CHCs, 87 HCCs, and 87 ICCs matched by propensity score matching. Patients were randomly assigned to a training cohort and a validation one at the ratio of 7:3. A nomogram integrating ultrasound imaging characteristics and clinical features was established based on the independent risk factors selected by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. The performance of the nomogram was evaluated in the training and validation cohorts in terms of discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness.

RESULTS

The nomogram, consisting of ultrasound imaging features (shape and margin on B-mode ultrasound, enhanced pattern on contrast-enhanced ultrasound) and clinical information [elevated alpha fetoprotein (AFP) level and serum protein electrophoresis (SPE) α1 level], showed promising performance in differentiating CHC from HCC and ICC, with the concordance index (C-index) of 0.8275 and 0.8530 in the training cohort and the validation cohort, respectively. Hosmer-Lemeshow test and the calibration curves suggested good consistency between predictions and observations. High clinical practicability was confirmed by the decision curve analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The nomogram based on clinical and ultrasound imaging characteristics showed good performance in the discrimination of CHC from other subtypes of PLC and would be valuable in clinical decision-making.

Survival outcomes of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma compared with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A SEER population-based cohort study

Background

Combined hepatocellular‐cholangiocarcinoma (CHC) is a heterogeneous group of primary liver cancers characterized by the coexistence of both hepatic and biliary cellular contents. The aim of this study was to compare CHC and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and investigate the treatment and survival of patients with CHC.

Methods

Data on CHC and ICC, including clinicopathological characteristics, treatments, and survival outcomes were extracted from the SEER database between 2004 and 2016. Univariate and multivariate analyses of all data were performed to identify the risk factors associated with survival outcomes. The overall survival (OS) rates of CHC patients who underwent hepatic resection (HR) or liver transplantation (LT) were also assessed before and after propensity score matching.

Results

A total of 1066 consecutive patients who had been diagnosed with CHC (n = 286) or ICC (n = 780) were identified. The mean age of the CHC cohort was 60.8±10.7 years old. Among the CHC group, a large proportion of the patients were men and of White ethnicity (73.1% and 71.3%, respectively). The majority of tumors were poorly differentiated (37.8%), while the most common AJCC stage at presentation was stage I (31.4%). Multivariable analysis of all CHC patients revealed that only tumor size, M₁ stage, AJCC stage IIIC, AJCC stage IV, surgery, and chemotherapy were significantly associated with OS. The OS was comparable with the ICC in the initial 36 months and better in the subsequent follow‐up after treatment. Surgery was associated with better survival outcomes, whether in the early or advanced stages. Regarding the specific types of surgery, the OS rates were similar in selected patients following HR or LT.

Conclusion

In patients with CHC, surgical intervention resulted in better long‐term survival outcomes than nonsurgical treatments. The OS rate of CHC patients compared with that of ICC patients was discriminated before and after a 3‐year follow‐up.

Biopsy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: results of a multicentre UK audit

BACKGROUND

Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is commonly diagnosed using non-invasive radiological criteria (NIRC) defined by the European Association for the Study of the Liver or the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. In 2017, The National Institute for Clinical Excellence mandated histological confirmation of disease to authorise the use of sorafenib in the UK.

METHODS

This was a prospective multicentre audit in which patients suitable for sorafenib were identified at multidisciplinary meetings. The primary analysis cohort (PAC) was defined by the presence of Child-Pugh class A liver disease and performance status 0-2. Clinical, radiological and histological data were reported locally and collected on a standardised case report form.

RESULTS

Eleven centres reported 418 cases, of which 361 comprised the PAC. Overall, 76% had chronic liver disease and 66% were cirrhotic. The diagnostic imaging was computed tomography in 71%, magnetic resonance imaging in 27% and 2% had both. Pre-existing histology was available in 45 patients and 270 underwent a new biopsy, which confirmed HCC in 93.4%. Alternative histological diagnoses included cholangiocarcinoma (CC) and combined HCC-CC. In cirrhotic patients, NIRC criteria had a sensitivity of 65.4% and a positive predictive value of 91.4% to detect HCC. Two patients (0.7%) experienced mild post-biopsy bleeding.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic biopsy is safe and feasible for most patients eligible for systemic therapy.

Update on the association of hepatitis B with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Is there new evidence?

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is a subgroup of cholangiocarcinoma that accounts for about 10%-20% of the total cases. Infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) is one of the most important predisposing factors leading to the formation of iCCA. It has been recently estimated based on abundant epidemiological data that the association between HBV infection and iCCA is strong with an odds ratio of about 4.5. The HBV-associated mechanisms that lead to iCCA are under intense investigation. The diagnosis of iCCA in the context of chronic liver disease is challenging and often requires histological confirmation to distinguish from hepatocellular carcinoma. It is currently unclear whether antiviral treatment for HBV can decrease the incidence of iCCA. In terms of management, surgical resection remains the mainstay of treatment. There is a need for effective treatment modalities beyond resection in both first- and second-line treatment. In this review, we summarize the epidemiological evidence that links the two entities, discuss the pathogenesis of HBV-associated iCCA, and present the available data on the diagnosis and management of this cancer.

Radio-pathologic correlation of biphenotypic primary liver cancer (combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma): changes in the 2019 WHO classification and impact on LI-RADS classification at liver MRI

OBJECTIVES

To explain the new changes in pathologic diagnoses of biphenotypic primary liver cancer (PLC) according to the updated 2019 World Health Organization (WHO) classification and how it impacts Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) classification using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (Gd-EOB-MRI).

METHODS

We retrospectively included 209 patients with pathologically proven biphenotypic PLCs according to the 2010 WHO classification who had undergone preoperative Gd-EOB-MRI between January 2009 and December 2018. Imaging analysis including LI-RADS classification and pathologic review including the proportion of tumor components were performed. Frequencies of each diagnosis and subtype according to the 2010 and 2019 WHO classifications were compared, and changes in LI-RADS classification were evaluated. Univariable and multivariable analysis were performed to determine significant tumor component for LI-RADS classification.

RESULTS

Of the 209 biphenotypic PLCs of the 2010 WHO classification, 177 (84.7%) were diagnosed as bipheonotypic PLCs, 25 (12.0%) as hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), and 7 (3.3%) as cholangiocarcinomas (CCAs) using the 2019 WHO classification. Of the 177 biphenotypic PLCs, LR-M, LR-4, and LR-5 were assigned in 77 (43.5%), 21 (11.9%), and 63 (35.5%), respectively. There were no significant differences in the proportion of LR-5 and LR-M categories between the WHO 2010 and 2019 classifications (p = 0.941). Proportion of HCC component was the only independent factor for LI-RADS classification (adjusted odds ratio, 1.02; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

According to the 2019 WHO classification, 15% of biphenotypic PLCs from the 2010 WHO classification were re-diagnosed as HCCs or CCAs, and a substantial proportion of biphenotypic PLCs of the 2019 WHO classification could be categorized as LR-4 or LR-5 on Gd-EOB-MRI.

KEY POINTS

• Among 209 diagnosed biphenotypic PLCs according to the 2010 WHO classification, 177 (84.7%) lesions were reclassified as bipheonotypic PLCs, 25 (12.0%) as HCCs, and 7 (3.3%) as CCAs using the 2019 WHO classification. • Of the 177 biphenotypic PLCs at the 2019 WHO classification, LR-M, LR-4, and LR-5 were assigned in 77 (43.5%), 21 (11.9%), and 63 (35.5%), respectively. • LI-RADS classification relied on the proportion of HCC component (adjusted odds ratio,1.02; p < 0.001).

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma: An update

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) is a tumour that exhibits both hepatocytic and biliary differentiation. Classical risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) seem to also predispose patients to the development of cHCC-CCA. The pathological definition of cHCC-CCA has significantly evolved over time. The last 2019 WHO classification highlighted that the diagnosis of cHCC-CCA should be primarily based on morphology using routine stainings, with additional immunostaining used to refine the identification of subtypes. Among them, "intermediate cell carcinoma" is recognised as a specific subtype, while "cholangiolocellular carcinoma" is now considered a subtype of iCCA. Increasing molecular evidence supports the clonal nature of cHCC-CCA and parallels its biphenotypic histological appearance, with genetic alterations that are classically observed in HCC and/or iCCA. That said, the morphological diagnosis of cHCC-CCA is still challenging for radiologists and pathologists, especially on biopsy specimens. Identification of cHCC-CCA's cell of origin remains an area of active research. Its prognosis is generally worse than that of HCC, and similar to that of iCCA. Resection with lymph node dissection is unfortunately the only curative option for patients with cHCC-CCA. Thus, there remains an urgent need to develop specific therapeutic strategies for this unique clinical entity.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Atypical Imaging Features: Review of the Morphologic Hepatocellular Carcinoma Subtypes With Radiology-Pathology Correlation

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fastest growing cause of cancer death in the United States with the incidence rate more than doubling in 20 years. HCC is unique since a noninvasive diagnosis can be achieved with imaging alone when specific clinical criteria and imaging characteristics are met, obviating the need for tissue sampling. However, HCC is a highly heterogeneous neoplasm. Atypical HCC subtypes vary significantly in their morphology, which can be attributed to specific histologic and molecular features, and can cause deviations from the classic imaging characteristics. The different morphologic subtypes of HCC frequently present a diagnostic challenge for radiologists and pathologists since their imaging and pathologic features can overlap with those of non-HCC malignancies. Identifying an atypical subtype can have important clinical implications. Liver transplant, albeit a scarce and limited resource, is the optimal treatment for conventional HCC, potentially curing both the tumor and the underlying pre-malignant condition. Some HCC subtypes as well as mimickers are associated with unacceptably high recurrence and poor outcome after transplant, and there remains limited data on the role and prognosis of liver transplantation for treatment of rare HCC subtypes. Other subtypes tend to recur later than classic HCC, potentially requiring a different follow-up scheme. This review will discuss the appearance of different HCC subtypes in relation to their histopathologic features. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

New insights into the pathophysiology and clinical care of rare primary liver cancers

Hepatocholangiocarcinoma, fibrolamellar carcinoma, hepatic haemangioendothelioma and hepatic angiosarcoma represent less than 5% of primary liver cancers. Fibrolamellar carcinoma and hepatic haemangioendothelioma are driven by unique somatic genetic alterations (DNAJB1-PRKCA and CAMTA1-WWTR1 fusions, respectively), while the pathogenesis of hepatocholangiocarcinoma remains more complex, as suggested by its histological diversity. Histology is the gold standard for diagnosis, which remains challenging even in an expert centre because of the low incidences of these liver cancers. Resection, when feasible, is the cornerstone of treatment, together with liver transplantation for hepatic haemangioendothelioma. The role of locoregional therapies and systemic treatments remains poorly studied. In this review, we aim to describe the recent advances in terms of diagnosis and clinical management of these rare primary liver cancers.

Clinical value and potential mechanisms of LINC00221 in hepatocellular carcinoma based on integrated analysis

Aims:This study aimed to unveil the functional roles of LINC00221 in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Materials and methods:A discovery cohort and a validation cohort were respectively used to identify and verify the clinical value of LINC00221 in HCC. Bioinformatics analysis was performed to explore its potential mechanisms. Results:LINC00221 was upregulated in HCC tissues and serum samples. Survival analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve further revealed its prognostic and diagnostic roles. Exploration of the mechanism showed that LINC00221 might exert a pro-cancer role via the lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA network.Conclusions: Our study reveals that upregulated LINC00221 can serve as a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker and provides novel clues as to the role of LINC00221 in HCC.

Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 - tumor marker: Past, present, and future

Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) is a cell surface glycoprotein complex most commonly associated with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Koprowski first described it in 1979 using a mouse monoclonal antibody in a colorectal carcinoma cell line. Historically, it is one of the most commonly used tumor markers for diagnosing, managing, and prognosticating PDAC. Additionally, elevated CA 19-9 levels are used as an indication for surgery in suspected benign pancreatic conditions. Another common application of CA 19-9 in the biliary tract includes its use as an adjunct in diagnosing cholangiocarcinoma. However, its clinical value is not limited to the hepatopancreatobiliary system. The reality is that the advancing literature has broadened the clinical value of CA 19-9. The potential value of CA 19-9 in patients' workup extends its reach to gastrointestinal cancers - such as colorectal and oesophageal cancer - and further beyond the gastrointestinal tract - including urological, gynecological, pulmonary, and thyroid pathologies. Apart from its role in investigations, CA 19-9 presents a potential therapeutic target in PDAC and acute pancreatitis. In a bid to consolidate its broad utility, we appraised and reviewed the biomarker's current utility and limitations in investigations and management, while discussing the potential applications for CA 19-9 in the works for the future.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in association with serum biomarkers for differentiating combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (CHC) is a rare type of primary liver cancer. Due to its complex histopathological characteristics, the imaging features of CHC can overlap with those of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

AIM

To investigate the possibility and efficacy of differentiating CHC from HCC and ICC by using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) and tumor biomarkers.

METHODS

Between January 2016 and December 2019, patients with histologically confirmed CHC, ICC and HCC with chronic liver disease were enrolled. The diagnostic formula for CHC was as follows: (1) LR-5 or LR-M with elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9); (2) LR-M with elevated AFP and normal CA19-9; or (3) LR-5 with elevated CA19-9 and normal AFP. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated to determine the diagnostic value of the criteria.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, 134 patients (mean age of 51.4 ± 9.4 years, 108 men) were enrolled, including 35 CHC, 29 ICC and 70 HCC patients. Based on CEUS LI-RADS classification, 74.3% (26/35) and 25.7% (9/35) of CHC lesions were assessed as LR-M and LR-5, respectively. The rates of elevated AFP and CA19-9 in CHC patients were 51.4% and 11.4%, respectively, and simultaneous elevations of AFP and CA19-9 were found in 8.6% (3/35) of CHC patients. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the aforementioned diagnostic criteria for discriminating CHC from HCC and ICC were 40.0%, 89.9%, 58.3%, 80.9%, 76.9% and 0.649, respectively. When considering the reported prevalence of CHC (0.4%-14.2%), the positive predictive value and NPV were revised to 1.6%-39.6% and 90.1%-99.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

CHCs are more likely to be classified as LR-M than LR-5 by CEUS LI-RADS. The combination of the CEUS LI-RADS classification with serum tumor markers shows high specificity but low sensitivity for the diagnosis of CHC. Moreover, CHC could be confidently excluded with high NPV.

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma: An update on epidemiology, classification, diagnosis and management

BACKGROUND

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (CHC) is a rare subtype of primary hepatic malignancies, with variably reported incidence between 0.4%-14.2% of primary liver cancer cases. This study aimed to systematically review the epidemiological, clinicopathological, diagnostic and therapeutic data for this rare entity.

DATA SOURCES

We reviewed the literature of diagnostic approach of CHC with special reference to its clinical, molecular and histopathological characteristics. Additional analysis of the recent literature in order to evaluate the results of surgical and systemic treatment of this entity has been accomplished.

RESULTS

The median age at CHC's diagnosis appears to be between 50 and 75 years. Evaluation of tumor markers [alpha fetoprotein (AFP), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)] along with imaging patterns provides better opportunities for CHC's preoperative diagnosis. Reported clinicopathologic prognostic parameters possibly correlated with increased tumor recurrence and grimmer survival odds include advanced age, tumor size, nodal and distal metastases, vascular and regional organ invasion, multifocality, decreased capsule formation, stem-cell features verification and increased GGT as well as CA19-9 and CEA levels. In case of inoperable or recurrent disease, combinations of cholangiocarcinoma-directed systemic agents display superior results over sorafenib. Liver-directed methods, such as transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI), hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC), radioembolization and ablative therapies, demonstrate inferior efficacy than in cases of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) due to CHC's common hypovascularity.

CONCLUSIONS

CHC demonstrates an overlapping clinical and biological pattern between its malignant ingredients. Natural history of the disease seems to be determined by the predominant tumor element. Gold standard for diagnosis is histology of surgical specimens. Regarding therapeutic interventions, major hepatectomy is acknowledged as the cornerstone of treatment whereas minor hepatectomy and liver transplantation may be applied in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Despite all therapeutic attempts, prognosis of CHC remains dismal.

A Contemporary Approach to Diagnosis and Treatment of Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma

Purpose of review

To provide updates on terminology, epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA).

Recent findings

cHCC-CCAs are tumors that in the same nodule contain a variable degree of HCC and CCA components with a transition zone. cHCC-CCAs develop in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic livers like and is associated with poor outcomes. Mutations in TP53, TERT promoter, and ARID1A are the most common genetic aberrations in cHCC-CCA. Fusion gene PTMS-AP1G1 is unique for cHCC-CCA. A biopsy is required for diagnosis. Surgical resection remains treatment of choice, while liver transplantation for early cHCC-CCA is associated with favorable outcomes. Gemcitabine-based therapy shows benefits for advanced cHCC-CCA.

Summary

cHCC-CCAs are a heterogeneous group of primary liver cancers with unique biological behavior. Multicenter studies are required for a molecular analysis to inform novel therapeutic approaches, and understand epidemiology and benefits of liver transplantation, liver-directed and targeted therapies for this rare aggressive cancer.

Update on the Genetics of and Systemic Therapy Options for Combined Hepatocellular Cholangiocarcinoma

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-ICC) is an uncommon and aggressive form of primary liver cancer. Currently, there are no international guidelines for optimal management. For localized tumors, radical resection represents the preferred treatment option, whereas for advanced tumors, systemic therapies recommended for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are often selected. Emerging information from comparative cohort studies, genomic and transcriptomic data sets are starting to build a case for rationalized approaches to systemic treatment in the advanced setting specific to cHCC-ICC.

Long non-coding RNA BACE1-AS is an independent unfavorable prognostic factor in liver cancer

Liver cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-associated deaths with incidence rates continuously on the rise. Biomarkers are urgently required for early diagnosis and better prognostic classification, which is essential for risk stratification and optimizing treatment strategies in clinical settings. By analyzing the data extracted from The Cancer Genome Atlas database using R, the long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) β-site APP-cleaving enzyme 1 antisense (BACE1-AS) was discovered to have both high diagnostic and prognostic values in liver cancer, which could serve as a promising biomarker in clinical settings. Precisely, lncRNA BACE1-AS is significantly overexpressed in liver cancer and its levels vary within different subgroups, suggesting its tumorigenic role. Furthermore, higher BACE1-AS predicts poorer overall survival and relapse-free survival outcomes. Overall, the present study demonstrated that BACE1-AS may be involved in liver cancer progression and could serve as a promising biomarker for diagnosis and prognostic evaluation.

A Patient's Journey With Rare Biphenotypic Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Cholangiocarcinoma

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) is a rare neoplastic primary liver cancer that is also known as mixed HCC-CC since it portrays characteristics of both hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CC). It constitutes less than 5% of primary liver cancers, hence, the literature lacks guidance on the management of these patients. A handful of case series has been published on clinical features and surgical outcomes. There is next-to-no mention of how to treat these patients. However, surgery has proven the most definitive treatment with varied responses to systemic therapies. We present a case of cHCC-CC in a patient who has undergone multiple treatment modalities, including surgical resection, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy.

Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma: Changes in the 2019 World Health Organization Histological Classification System and Potential Impact on Imaging-Based Diagnosis

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) is a primary liver cancer (PLC) with both hepatocytic and cholangiocytic phenotypes. Recently, the World Health Organization (WHO) updated its histological classification system for cHCC-CCA. Compared to the previous WHO histological classification system, the new version no longer recognizes subtypes of cHCC-CCA with stem cell features. Furthermore, some of these cHCC-CCA subtypes with stem cell features have been recategorized as either hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (ICCs). Additionally, distinctive diagnostic terms for intermediate cell carcinomas and cholangiolocarcinomas (previous cholangiolocellular carcinoma subtype) are now recommended. It is important for radiologists to understand these changes because of its potential impact on the imaging-based diagnosis of HCC, particularly because cHCC-CCAs frequently manifest as HCC mimickers, ICC mimickers, or as indeterminate on imaging studies. Therefore, in this review, we introduce the 2019 WHO classification system for cHCC-CCA, illustrate important imaging features characteristic of its subtypes, discuss the impact on imaging-based diagnosis of HCC, and address other important considerations.

Evaluation of Primary Liver Cancers Using Hepatocyte-Specific Contrast-Enhanced MRI: Pitfalls and Potential Tips

When radiologists interpret hepatic focal lesions seen on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, it is important not only to distinguish malignant lesions from benign ones but also to distinguish nonhepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) malignancies from HCCs. In addition, most major guidelines, including those of the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease, European Association for the Study of the Liver, and Korean Liver Cancer Association and National Cancer Center, allow for the noninvasive imaging diagnosis of HCC in at-risk patients. However, ~40% of HCC cases show atypical imaging features mimicking non-HCC malignancies. Furthermore, several benign and malignant lesions, such as flash-filling hemangioma and intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma, frequently look like HCC. In contrast, although multiparametric MRI options, including hepatobiliary phase and diffusion-weighted imaging, provide useful information that could help address these challenges, there remain several unresolved issues with regard to the noninvasive diagnostic criteria characterizing HCC. In this article, we discuss the typical imaging features and challenging situations related to primary liver cancers in MRI, while considering how to make a correct diagnosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 3.

Atypical Appearance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Its Mimickers: How to Solve Challenging Cases Using Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be diagnosed noninvasively with contrast-enhanced dynamic computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or ultrasonography on the basis of its hallmark imaging features of arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout on portal or delayed phase images. However, approximately 40% of HCCs show atypical imaging features, posing a significant diagnostic challenge for radiologists. Another challenge for radiologists in clinical practice is the presentation of many HCC mimickers such as intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, combined HCC-cholangiocarcinoma, arterioportal shunt, and hemangioma in the cirrhotic liver. The differentiation of HCCs from these mimickers on preoperative imaging studies is of critical importance. Hence, we will review the typical and atypical imaging features of HCCs and the imaging features of its common mimickers. In addition, we will discuss how to solve these challenges in practice.

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma: which preoperative clinical data and conventional MRI characteristics have value for the prediction of microvascular invasion and clinical significance?

Objectives

To explore which preoperative clinical data and conventional MRI findings may indicate microvascular invasion (MVI) of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) and have clinical significance.

Methods

The study enrolled 113 patients with histopathologically confirmed cHCC-CCA (MVI-positive group [n = 56], MVI-negative group [n = 57]). Two radiologists retrospectively assessed the preoperative MRI features (qualitative analysis of morphology and dynamic enhancement features), and each lesion was assigned according to the LI-RADS. Preoperative clinical data were also evaluated. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess the relative value of these parameters as potential predictors of MVI. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates after hepatectomy in the two groups were estimated using Kaplan–Meier survival curves and compared using the log-rank test.

Results

The majority of cHCC-CCAs were categorized as LR-M. On multivariate analysis, a higher serum AFP level (OR, 0.523; 95% CI, 0.282–0.971; p = 0.040), intratumoral fat deposition (OR, 14.368; 95% CI, 2.749–75.098; p = 0.002), and irregular arterial peritumoral enhancement (OR, 0.322; 95% CI, 0.164–0.631; p = 0.001) were independent variables associated with the MVI of cHCC-CCA. After hepatectomy, patients with MVI of cHCC-CCA showed earlier recurrence than those without MVI (hazard ratio [HR], 0.402; 95% CI, 0.189–0.854, p = 0.013).

Conclusion

A higher serum AFP level and irregular arterial peritumoral enhancement are potential predictive biomarkers for the MVI of cHCC-CCA, while intratumoral fat detected on MRI suggests a low risk of MVI. Furthermore, cHCC-CCAs with MVI may have worse surgical outcomes with regard to early recurrence than those without MVI.

Key Points

• Higher serum levels of AFP combined with irregular arterial peritumoral enhancement are independent risk factors for the MVI of cHCC-CCA, while fat deposition might be a protective factor.

• cHCC-CCA with MVI may have a higher risk of early recurrence after surgery.

• Most cHCC-CCAs were categorized as LR-M in this study, and no significant difference was found in MVI based on LI-RADS category.

Checkpoint Inhibition Causing Complete Remission of Metastatic Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma after Hepatic Resection

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (CHC) is a rare type of primary liver cancer, speculated to arise from hepatic progenitor cells, and with a worse prognosis than hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels may be one prognostic factor. It has been suggested that checkpoint inhibition might be useful in the treatment of HCC where there is an increased expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 in the microenvironment. Its effect on CHC is unknown. We report a case with a large CHC, which was radically resected, but the 53-year-old female patient subsequently developed pulmonary metastases. Histology demonstrated low-differentiated CHC without microsatellite instability. Treatment with sorafenib was started but was stopped due to angioedema. Under subsequent gemcitabine/cisplatin treatment, the metastatic disease progressed with rising AFP levels. A third-line treatment with pembrolizumab was then started, 2 mg/kg b.w. i.v. every third week for 6 months. This resulted in a radiologically complete remission of the pulmonary metastases and AFP levels were normalized (<10 μg/L) from a level of 1,790 μg/L before treatment. The patient developed immune-related adverse events (AEs) including diarrhea and hepatitis. These AEs were successfully treated with prednisolone and mycophenolate mofetil, and they were eventually resolved. There are no signs of cancer recurrence neither in the liver nor in the lungs at 33 months after the start of the checkpoint inhibition treatment, and the patient is doing well. Further study is urgently needed on the role of checkpoint inhibition therapy in liver cancer.

Progress and prospects of biomarkers in primary liver cancer (Review)

Tumor biomarkers are important in the early screening, diagnosis, therapeutic evaluation, recurrence and prognosis prediction of tumors. Primary liver cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors; it has high incidence and mortality rates and seriously endangers human health. The main pathological types of primary liver cancer include hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and combined HCC‑cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC‑CC). In the present review, a systematic outline of the current biomarkers of primary liver cancer is presented, from conventional blood biomarkers, histochemical biomarkers and potential biomarkers to resistance‑associated biomarkers. The important relationships are deeply elucidated between biomarkers and diagnosis, prognosis, clinicopathological features and resistance, as well as their clinical significance, in patients with the three main types of primary liver cancer. Moreover, a summary of several important biomarker signaling pathways is provided, which is helpful for studying the biological mechanism of liver cancer. The purpose of this review is to provide help for clinical or medical researchers in the early diagnosis, differential diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of HCC.

Long-term outcome and prognostic factors of combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma after curative resection

Background

Combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) is a rare subtype of primary liver cancers. Its prognostic factors remain unclear. The study aimed to evaluate its long-term outcome and prognostic factors by retrospectively reviewing the series of cHCC-CC after curative resection from our institute.

Methods

A total of 55 pathologically confirmed cHCC-CC patients undergoing curative resections between January 2003 and January 2018 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (Guangzhou, China) were included. The clinicopathological and follow-up data were retrieved. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survivals (RFS) were analysed by Kaplan–Meier curve. The independent prognostic factors were determined by using univariate and multivariate Cox analyses.

Results

There were 41 males and 14 females, with a median age of 51.0 (interquartile range, 44.0–60.0) years. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS and RFS rates in cHCC-CC were 80.0%, 25.5%, and 16.4%, respectively, and 52.7%, 21.8%, and 10.9%, respectively. The median OS and RFS were 24.9 and 14.5 months, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that elevated alpha-fetal protein (AFP) and/or CA19-9, vascular invasion, local extra-hepatic invasion, and lymph-node metastasis (LNM) were independent unfavorable prognostic factors for OS and RFS (all P < 0.005). Furthermore, elevated AFP and/or CA19-9 were independent unfavorable prognostic factors in various subgroups of cHCC-CC, including patients aged <60 years, positive hepatitis B surface antigen, cirrhosis, single tumor, tumor size ≥5 cm, no vascular invasion, no LNM, and no local extra-hepatic invasion (all P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Elevated AFP and/or CA19-9, vascular invasion, local extra-hepatic invasion, and LNM were independent unfavorable prognostic factors for long-term survival of cHCC-CC undergoing curative resections. Patients with normal levels of AFP and CA19-9 had better prognosis.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging features and clinical characteristics of combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma: comparison with hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare the clinical characteristics and imaging features on (CEUS) of combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma (CHC) with those of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CC).

Methods

The clinical information and CEUS features of 45 patients with CHC from 2015 to 2019 and 1-to-1-matched control subjects with HCC and CC (45 each) were compared.

Results

Simultaneous elevation of α-fetoprotein (AFP) and cancer antigen (CA) 19-9 was more common in CHC than in HCC and CC. In the arterial phase, hyperenhancement (homogeneous and heterogeneous) was more common in CHC (73.3%) and HCC (100%), while peripheral rim-like enhancement was more common in CC (55.6%). In the portal phase, marked washout was significantly more frequent in CHC and CC than in HCC (42.2% and 53.3% vs. 6.7%). In the delayed phase, marked washout was more common in CHC (82.2%) and CC (93.3%) than in HCC (40.0%). The washout time (WT) was much shorter in CHC and CC than in HCC (33.8±13.1 seconds and 30.1±11.6 seconds vs. 58.4±23.5 seconds). Using the combination of simultaneous elevation of AFP and CA 19-9 with marked washout in the delayed phase and a WT <38 seconds or arterial hyperenhancement to differentiate CHC from HCC or CC, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 74.4%, 93.3%, and 55.6% and 71.1%, 80.0%, and 62.2%, respectively.

Conclusion

Although some CEUS imaging features of CHC, HCC, and CC overlap, the combination of tumor markers and CEUS features can be helpful in differentiating CHC from HCC and CC.

Outcomes of Yttrium-90 Radioembolization for Unresectable Combined Biphenotypic Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate outcomes of yttrium-90 radioembolization in patients with combined biphenotypic hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with biopsy-confirmed cHCC-CC treated with yttrium-90 radioembolization between 2012 and 2018 was performed. Twenty-two patients with cHCC-CC (mean age 65.6 y, 17 men, 5 women) underwent 29 radioembolization treatments (5 resin, 24 glass microspheres). Survival data were available in 21 patients, and hepatic imaging response data were available in 20 patients. Hepatic imaging response to radioembolization was assessed on follow-up CT or MR imaging using modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours criteria. Univariate stepwise Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between demographic and clinical factors and survival. Logistic regression evaluated associations between clinical factors and response to treatment, overall response, and disease control.

RESULTS

Hepatic imaging response was as follows: 15% complete response, 40% partial response, 10% stable disease, and 35% progressive disease (55% response rate, 65% disease control rate). Two patients were downstaged or bridged to transplant, and 1 patient was downstaged to resection. Median overall survival was 9.3 mo (range, 2.5-31.0 mo) from time of radioembolization. Nonreponse to treatment, bilobar disease, presence of multiple tumors, and elevated carbohydrate antigen 19-9 before treatment were associated with reduced survival after radioembolization.

CONCLUSIONS

Radioembolization is a viable option for locoregional control of cHCC-CC with good response and disease control rates.

Differentiation combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma based on radiomics machine learning

BACKGROUND

Combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma (CHC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are hard to identify in clinical practice preoperatively. This study looked to develop and confirm a radiomics-based model for preoperative differentiation CHC from ICC.

METHODS

The model was developed in 86 patients with ICC and 46 CHC, confirmed in 37 ICC and 20 CHC, and data were collected from January 2014 to December 2018. The radiomics scores (Radscores) were built from radiomics features of contrast-enhanced computed tomography in 12 regions of interest (ROI). The Radscore and clinical-radiologic factors were integrated into the combined model using multivariable logistic regression. The best-combined model constructed the radiomics-based nomogram, and the performance was assessed concerning its calibration, discrimination, and clinical usefulness.

RESULTS

The radiomics features extracted from tumor ROI in the arterial phase (AP) with preprocessing were selected to build Radscore and yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.800 and 0.789 in training and validation cohorts, respectively. The radiomics-based model contained Radscore and 4 clinical-radiologic factors showed the best performance (training cohort, AUC =0.942; validation cohort, AUC =0.942) and good calibration (training cohort, AUC =0.935; validation cohort, AUC =0.931).

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed radiomics-based model may be used conveniently to the preoperatively differentiate CHC from ICC.

Assessment of liver cancer biomarkers

Liver cancer is the third cause of cancer-related deaths in the world. It is primarily divides into two main types, namely hepatocellular carcinoma (HC) and cholangiocarcinoma (IC). Due to the increasing number of patients with liver cancer and the high mortality rate, early diagnosis of the disease can be helpful in treatment, but most patients are diagnosed atlate stages of HC. The aim of this study is to screen and provide an overview on candidate biomarkers related to primary liver cancer to introduce the critical ones. In this study, various biomarkers related to the diagnosis of primary liver cancer have been studied. Accordingly, biomarkers are divided into different groups as blood biomarkers classified as serum and plasma biomarkers, tissue biomarkers, microRNA biomarkers, proteomic biomarkers and altered genes. Previous researches have focused on liver cells and bile ducts, the surround cellular environment, how cells differentiate, and the types of genes expressed in liver cancer. Some even have focused on the origin of tumor cells and how they differentiate and develop. In all these studies, the expression of specific proteins and genes in liver cancer has been considered. Based on available sources, biomarkers can be considered as candidates to diagnose and prognosis of various types of primary liver cancer, from sources such as blood, tissue, mic-RNA, proteome and genes. However, more investigations are required to introduce a biomarker for precise detection of early liver cancer.

Individualized Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Tailored Approaches across the Phenotype Spectrum

Ablation is now recommended by international guidelines for the definitive treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Extensive clinical studies have demonstrated outcomes comparable to surgical resection with shorter hospital stays, decreased costs, and improved quality of life. Successful ablation requires complete treatment of both tumor and margin while preserving critical adjacent structures. HCC exhibits highly variable presentations in both anatomic involvement and biology which have significant implications on choice of ablative therapy. There are now abundant ablation modalities and adjunctive techniques which can be used to individualize ablation and maximize curative results. This article provides a patient-centered summary of approaches to HCC ablation in the context of patient performance, hepatic reserve, tumor phenotype and biology, intra- and extrahepatic anatomy, and ablation technology.

Spectrum of Pitfalls, Pseudolesions, and Potential Misdiagnoses in Cirrhosis

OBJECTIVE

The purposes of this article are to review a variety of pitfalls in liver imaging that can lead to the inaccurate diagnosis of focal hepatic lesions in cirrhosis, to describe the pathophysiologic processes of these pitfalls, and to provide specific clues for achieving the correct diagnoses.

CONCLUSION

Cirrhosis complicates liver imaging. The distortion and replacement of normal liver parenchyma by fibrous and regenerative tissue can change the typical appearance of many benign lesions, causing them to be misinterpreted as malignancy. In addition, the high incidence and prevalence of hepatocellular carcinoma among patients with cirrhosis put radiologists on high alert for any suspicious findings, especially because not all hepatocellular carcinomas have a typical imaging appearance.

How to utilize LR-M features of the LI-RADS to improve the diagnosis of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI?

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of each LR-M feature defined in version 2017 of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) and determine the optimal LR-M feature for differentiating combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on gadoxetate-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

Ninety-nine patients with pathologically proven cHCC-CCA (n = 33) or HCC (n = 66) after surgery were identified. Two radiologists retrospectively assessed preoperative gadoxetate-enhanced MRI for features favoring non-HCC malignancies (LR-M features) according to LI-RADS version 2017. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the independent differential features. The sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing cHCC-CCA were calculated for each LR-M feature.

RESULTS

Targetoid appearance showed the highest sensitivity (75.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 60.6%, 87.3%) to correctly identify cHCC-CCA as LR-M. At least one LR-M feature was observed in 31 (93.9%) patients with cHCC-CCA and 34 (51.5%) patients with HCC. The sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing cHCC-CCA using the presence of any one of the LR-M features were 93.9% (95% CI 80.7, 98.9) and 48.5% (95% CI 41.9, 51.0), respectively. The presence of three LR-M features yielded the highest diagnostic accuracy of 80.8% (95% CI 72.1, 86.1) with a reduced sensitivity of 54.5% (95% CI 41.4, 62.5).

CONCLUSION

The majority of cHCC-CCA cases can be properly categorized as LR-M when any one of the LR-M features defined in the LI-RADS version 2017 is used as a determiner. However, approximately half of HCC cases also show at least one LR-M feature.

KEY POINTS

• Targetoid appearance, including rim APHE, peripheral "washout" appearance, and delayed central enhancement, was the LR-M feature that identified cHCC-CCA as a non-HCC malignancy with the highest sensitivity. • Most cHCC-CCA cases can be properly categorized as LR-M when the presence of any one of the LR-M features was used as the determiner. • Approximately half of HCC cases also showed at least one LR-M feature.

Management of combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the recent consensus on the nomenclature, clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment of combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA).

RECENT FINDING

cHCC-CCA is a primary liver carcinoma with varying degrees of hepatocytic and cholangiocytic cytology and architecture within the same tumor. The diagnosis of cHCC-CCA can only be established based on histologic examination. Surgical resection should be considered in patients with resectable tumors who do not have underlying liver disease or clinically significant portal hypertension. While treatment by liver transplantation (LT) is controversial due to the high risk of post LT recurrence, LT should remain as a potentially curative option in a highly selected group of patients. Little data exist for the outcome of other treatments.

SUMMARY

High quality multicenter prospective studies should be conducted to better understand this rare, but increasingly recognized tumor.