1
|
Joo Y, Kim MJ, Yoon JH, Rho M, Park VY. Second breast cancer following negative breast MRI: Analysis by interval from surgery and risk factors. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0306828. [PMID: 39146263 PMCID: PMC11326552 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 08/17/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aims to compare outcomes following a negative surveillance MRI study by surgery-MRI interval and investigate factors associated with second breast cancers in women with a personal history of breast cancer (PHBC). METHODS This retrospective study included 1552 consecutive women (mean age, 53 years) with a PHBC and a negative prevalence surveillance breast MRI result between August 2014 and December 2016. The incidence and characteristics of second breast cancers were reviewed and compared according to surgery-MRI interval (< 3 years vs ≥ 3 years). Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate associations with clinical-pathologic characteristics. RESULTS Twenty-five second breast cancers occurred after negative MRI. The incidence of second breast cancers or local-regional recurrence did not significantly differ by surgery-MRI interval. The median intervals between MRI to second breast cancer detection showed no significant difference between the two groups (surgery-MRI interval <3 years vs. ≥ 3 years). Two node-positive second breast cancers were detected in the group with <3 years interval. BRCA mutation status, receipt of breast-conserving surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy (all p < .05) were significant factors associated with the development of second breast cancers. CONCLUSION Outcomes following a negative surveillance MRI did not differ by surgery-MRI interval. BRCA mutation status, receipt of breast-conserving surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy were independently associated with the risk of developing second breast cancers after negative surveillance MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yohan Joo
- Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Min Jung Kim
- Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung Hyun Yoon
- Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Miribi Rho
- Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Vivian Youngjean Park
- Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brekke SG, Lucke A, Hasle H, Baad-Hansen T. The significance of surveillance imaging in children with Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2024; 41:273-282. [PMID: 38345039 DOI: 10.1080/08880018.2024.2311407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/18/2024]
Abstract
Primary bone tumors in children and adolescents, while rare, pose significant challenges in diagnosis and management. Children treated for Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma are offered a 5-year follow-up program after end of treatment, including radiological surveillance of primary location of tumor and the lungs. There is no consensus regarding how often and how the children should be followed with radiological imaging. This retrospective descriptive study of 69 patients (34 with Ewing sarcoma and 35 with osteosarcoma) investigated the consequences of abnormal findings in 1279 follow-up images. Nine relapses were detected, 4 in the Ewing group (3 local and 1 pulmonary) and 5 in the osteosarcoma group (1 local and 4 pulmonary). Of these, only two patients exhibited symptomatic relapses, with the remainder identified through imaging. The positive predictive value for relapse detection was 0.44 in the Ewing group, and 0.5 in the osteosarcoma group. In the Ewing sarcoma patient image follow-up program, the probability of anomaly detection was 12% (95% CI, 10-15). For osteosarcoma patients, the likelihood was 6% (95% CI, 4-8). Our data indicates that abnormal findings on follow-up images rarely represents relapse of tumor. As the surveillance protocol differs between the patient groups, wherein Ewing sarcoma patients primarily are monitored through MRI while osteosarcoma patients are predominantly tracked via X-rays, there is an increased occurrence of incidental findings in the first group. However, it is imperative to interpret imaging data in conjunction with clinical information, avoiding isolated reliance on imaging results when making treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Arne Lucke
- Department of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Henrik Hasle
- Department of Pediatrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Thomas Baad-Hansen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ha SM, Lee JM, Kim SO, Moon WK, Chang JM. Semiannual Breast US or MRI Screening in Patients with a Personal History of Breast Cancer. Radiology 2023; 307:e221660. [PMID: 37158719 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.221660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
Background The wide variability of screening imaging use in patients with a personal history of breast cancer (PHBC) warrants investigation of its comparative clinical effectiveness. While more intensive screening with US or MRI at an interval of less than 1 year could increase early-stage breast cancer detection, its benefit has not been established. Purpose To investigate the outcomes of semiannual multimodality screening in patients with PHBC. Materials and Methods An academic medical center database was retrospectively searched for patients diagnosed with breast cancer between January 2015 and June 2018 who had undergone annual mammography with either semiannual incidence US or MRI screening from July 2019 to December 2019 and three subsequent semiannual screenings over a 2-year period. The primary outcome was second breast cancers diagnosed during follow-up. Examination-level cancer detection and interval cancer rates were calculated. Screening performances were compared with χ2 or Fisher exact tests or a logistic model with generalized estimating equations. Results Our final cohort included 2758 asymptomatic women (median age, 53 years; range, 20-84 years). Among 5615 US and 1807 MRI examinations, 18 breast cancers were detected after negative findings on a prior semiannual incidence US screening examination; 44% (eight of 18) were stage 0 (three detected with MRI; five, with US), and 39% (seven of 18) were stage I (three detected with MRI; four, with US). MRI had a cancer detection rate up to 17.1 per 1000 examinations (eight of 467; 95% CI: 8.7, 33.4), and the overall cancer detection rates of US and MRI were 1.8 (10 of 5615; 95% CI: 1.0, 3.3) and 4.4 (eight of 1807; 95% CI: 2.2, 8.8) per 1000 examinations, respectively (P = .11). Conclusion Supplemental semiannual US or MRI screening depicted second breast cancers after negative findings at prior semiannual incidence US examination in patients with PHBC. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Berg in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Su Min Ha
- From the Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea (S.M.H., W.K.M., J.M.C.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.M.H., W.K.M., J.M.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash (J.M.L.); and Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.O.K.)
| | - Janie M Lee
- From the Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea (S.M.H., W.K.M., J.M.C.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.M.H., W.K.M., J.M.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash (J.M.L.); and Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.O.K.)
| | - Seon-Ok Kim
- From the Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea (S.M.H., W.K.M., J.M.C.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.M.H., W.K.M., J.M.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash (J.M.L.); and Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.O.K.)
| | - Woo Kyung Moon
- From the Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea (S.M.H., W.K.M., J.M.C.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.M.H., W.K.M., J.M.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash (J.M.L.); and Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.O.K.)
| | - Jung Min Chang
- From the Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea (S.M.H., W.K.M., J.M.C.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.M.H., W.K.M., J.M.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash (J.M.L.); and Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.O.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mehta TS, Lourenco AP, Niell BL, Bennett DL, Brown A, Chetlen A, Freer P, Ivansco LK, Jochelson MS, Klein KA, Malak SF, McCrary M, Mullins D, Neal CH, Newell MS, Ulaner GA, Moy L. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Imaging After Breast Surgery. J Am Coll Radiol 2022; 19:S341-S356. [PMID: 36436961 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Given that 20% to 40% of women who have percutaneous breast biopsy subsequently undergo breast surgery, knowledge of imaging women with a history of benign (including high-risk) disease or breast cancer is important. For women who had surgery for nonmalignant pathology, the surveillance recommendations are determined by their overall risk. Higher-than-average risk women with a history of benign surgery may require screening mammography starting at an earlier age before 40 and may benefit from screening MRI. For women with breast cancer who have undergone initial excision and have positive margins, imaging with diagnostic mammography or MRI can sometimes guide additional surgical planning. Women who have completed breast conservation therapy for cancer should get annual mammography and may benefit from the addition of MRI or ultrasound to their surveillance regimen. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances in which peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tejas S Mehta
- Director of Diversity, Equity Inclusion and Population Health in Radiology, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worchester, Massachusetts.
| | - Ana P Lourenco
- Panel Chair; Residency Program Director, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Bethany L Niell
- Panel Vice-Chair; Section Chief of Breast Imaging, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida; Commission Government Relations Chair
| | - Debbie L Bennett
- Section Chief - Breast Imaging, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology/Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri
| | - Ann Brown
- Assistant Section Chief, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Alison Chetlen
- Vice Chair of Education, Division Chief Breast Imaging, Penn State Health Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Phoebe Freer
- Section Chief, Breast Imaging, University of Utah/Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah; ACR/SCBI Screening Leadership Group Inaugural Class
| | - Lillian K Ivansco
- Assistant Chief, Department of Radiology, Section Chief for Breast Imaging and Quality, Co-Chair, Breast Imaging Sourcing and Standards Team, Kaiser Permanente Georgia, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Maxine S Jochelson
- Chief of the Breast Imaging Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | | | - Marion McCrary
- Associate Director of Duke GME Coaching, Duke Signature Care, Durham, North Carolina; American College of Physicians; Governor-Elect, American College of Physicians, North Carolina Chapter
| | - David Mullins
- Chief of Staff, Princeton Community Hospital, Princeton, West Virginia; American College of Surgeons
| | | | - Mary S Newell
- Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia; RADS Committee
| | - Gary A Ulaner
- Hoag Family Cancer Institute, Newport Beach, California and University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; Commission on Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
| | - Linda Moy
- Specialty Chair, NYU Clinical Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lee J, Kang BJ, Park GE, Kim SH. The Usefulness of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for the Detection of Local Recurrence after Mastectomy with Reconstructive Surgery in Breast Cancer Patients. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12092203. [PMID: 36140604 PMCID: PMC9497711 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12092203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2022] [Revised: 09/04/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection of local recurrence after nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) or skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) with immediate reconstructive surgery for breast cancer. Two hundred and eighty-six NSM or SSM procedures and immediate reconstruction cases between August 2015 and February 2020 were reviewed. The detectability rates of for local recurrence using MRI and ultrasound were assessed, and the characteristics of recurrent and primary cancers were evaluated. The patients with multifocal or multicentric primary cancer and a dense parenchymal pattern showed a higher recurrence rate (p < 0.001). A total of 22 cases showed recurrence, and due to multifocal recurrence, a total of 27 recurrent lesions were identified in the reconstructed breast, of which 12 were symptomatic and 15 were asymptomatic (p < 0.001). With the exception of skin recurrence (n = 6), MRI showed a significantly higher detectability rate (95.2%, 20 of 21) than ultrasound (38.1%, 8 of 21) for the recurrence of cancer in the reconstructed breast (p < 0.001), especially for small-sized (<1 cm) asymptomatic lesions. In addition, the mean recurrence interval of MRI-detected asymptomatic lesions was 21.7 months (SD ± 17.7), which was significantly longer than that of symptomatic recurrence. In conclusion, postoperative MRI can be useful for identifying small-sized (<1 cm) asymptomatic recurrence lesions in reconstructed breast tissue after NSM or SSM, which can be implemented within two years of surgery.
Collapse
|
6
|
Kim SY, Cho N, Hong H, Lee Y, Yoen H, Kim YS, Park AR, Ha SM, Lee SH, Chang JM, Moon WK. Abbreviated Screening MRI for Women with a History of Breast Cancer: Comparison with Full-Protocol Breast MRI. Radiology 2022; 305:36-45. [PMID: 35699580 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.213310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Background Few studies have compared abbreviated breast MRI with full-protocol MRI in women with a personal history of breast cancer (PHBC), and they have not adjusted for confounding variables. Purpose To compare abbreviated breast MRI with full-protocol MRI in women with PHBC by using propensity score matching to adjust for confounding variables. Materials and Methods In this single-center retrospective study, women with PHBC who underwent full-protocol MRI (January 2008-August 2017) or abbreviated MRI (September 2017-April 2019) were identified. With use of a propensity score-matched cohort, screening performances were compared between the two MRI groups with the McNemar test or a propensity score-adjusted generalized estimating equation. The coprimary analyses were sensitivity and specificity. The secondary analyses were the cancer detection rate, interval cancer rate, positive predictive value for biopsies performed (PPV3), and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 3 short-term follow-up rate. Results There were 726 women allocated to each MRI group (mean age ± SD, 50 years ± 8 for both groups). Abbreviated MRI and full-protocol MRI showed comparable sensitivity (15 of 15 cancers [100%; 95% CI: 78, 100] vs nine of 13 cancers [69%; 95% CI: 39, 91], respectively; P = .17). Abbreviated MRI showed higher specificity than full-protocol MRI (660 of 711 examinations [93%; 95% CI: 91, 95] vs 612 of 713 examinations [86%; 95% CI: 83, 88], respectively; P < .001). The cancer detection rate (21 vs 12 per 1000 examinations), interval cancer rate (0 vs five per 1000 examinations), and PPV3 (61% [14 of 23 examinations] vs 41% [nine of 22 examinations]) were comparable (all P < .05). The BI-RADS category 3 short-term follow-up rate of abbreviated MRI was less than half that of full-protocol MRI (5% [36 of 726 examinations] vs 12% [84 of 726 examinations], respectively; P < .001). Ninety-three percent (14 of 15) of cancers detected at abbreviated MRI were node-negative T1-invasive cancers (n = 6) or ductal carcinoma in situ (n = 8). Conclusion Abbreviated breast MRI showed comparable sensitivity and superior specificity to full-protocol MRI in breast cancer detection in women with a personal history of breast cancer. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soo-Yeon Kim
- From the Department of Radiology (S.Y.K., N.C., Y.L., H.Y., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.H.L., J.M.C., W.K.M.), Medical Research Collaborating Center (H.H.), Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, Republic of Korea (S.Y.K., N.C., Y.L., H.Y., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.H.L., J.M.C., W.K.M.); and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.Y.K., N.C., Y.L., H.Y., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.H.L., J.M.C., W.K.M.)
| | - Nariya Cho
- From the Department of Radiology (S.Y.K., N.C., Y.L., H.Y., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.H.L., J.M.C., W.K.M.), Medical Research Collaborating Center (H.H.), Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, Republic of Korea (S.Y.K., N.C., Y.L., H.Y., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.H.L., J.M.C., W.K.M.); and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.Y.K., N.C., Y.L., H.Y., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.H.L., J.M.C., W.K.M.)
| | - Hyunsook Hong
- From the Department of Radiology (S.Y.K., N.C., Y.L., H.Y., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.H.L., J.M.C., W.K.M.), Medical Research Collaborating Center (H.H.), Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, Republic of Korea (S.Y.K., N.C., Y.L., H.Y., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.H.L., J.M.C., W.K.M.); and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.Y.K., N.C., Y.L., H.Y., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.H.L., J.M.C., W.K.M.)
| | - Youkyoung Lee
- From the Department of Radiology (S.Y.K., N.C., Y.L., H.Y., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.H.L., J.M.C., W.K.M.), Medical Research Collaborating Center (H.H.), Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, Republic of Korea (S.Y.K., N.C., Y.L., H.Y., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.H.L., J.M.C., W.K.M.); and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.Y.K., N.C., Y.L., H.Y., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.H.L., J.M.C., W.K.M.)
| | - Heera Yoen
- From the Department of Radiology (S.Y.K., N.C., Y.L., H.Y., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.H.L., J.M.C., W.K.M.), Medical Research Collaborating Center (H.H.), Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, Republic of Korea (S.Y.K., N.C., Y.L., H.Y., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.H.L., J.M.C., W.K.M.); and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.Y.K., N.C., Y.L., H.Y., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.H.L., J.M.C., W.K.M.)
| | - Yeon Soo Kim
- From the Department of Radiology (S.Y.K., N.C., Y.L., H.Y., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.H.L., J.M.C., W.K.M.), Medical Research Collaborating Center (H.H.), Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, Republic of Korea (S.Y.K., N.C., Y.L., H.Y., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.H.L., J.M.C., W.K.M.); and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.Y.K., N.C., Y.L., H.Y., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.H.L., J.M.C., W.K.M.)
| | - Ah Reum Park
- From the Department of Radiology (S.Y.K., N.C., Y.L., H.Y., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.H.L., J.M.C., W.K.M.), Medical Research Collaborating Center (H.H.), Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, Republic of Korea (S.Y.K., N.C., Y.L., H.Y., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.H.L., J.M.C., W.K.M.); and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.Y.K., N.C., Y.L., H.Y., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.H.L., J.M.C., W.K.M.)
| | - Su Min Ha
- From the Department of Radiology (S.Y.K., N.C., Y.L., H.Y., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.H.L., J.M.C., W.K.M.), Medical Research Collaborating Center (H.H.), Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, Republic of Korea (S.Y.K., N.C., Y.L., H.Y., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.H.L., J.M.C., W.K.M.); and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.Y.K., N.C., Y.L., H.Y., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.H.L., J.M.C., W.K.M.)
| | - Su Hyun Lee
- From the Department of Radiology (S.Y.K., N.C., Y.L., H.Y., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.H.L., J.M.C., W.K.M.), Medical Research Collaborating Center (H.H.), Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, Republic of Korea (S.Y.K., N.C., Y.L., H.Y., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.H.L., J.M.C., W.K.M.); and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.Y.K., N.C., Y.L., H.Y., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.H.L., J.M.C., W.K.M.)
| | - Jung Min Chang
- From the Department of Radiology (S.Y.K., N.C., Y.L., H.Y., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.H.L., J.M.C., W.K.M.), Medical Research Collaborating Center (H.H.), Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, Republic of Korea (S.Y.K., N.C., Y.L., H.Y., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.H.L., J.M.C., W.K.M.); and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.Y.K., N.C., Y.L., H.Y., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.H.L., J.M.C., W.K.M.)
| | - Woo Kyung Moon
- From the Department of Radiology (S.Y.K., N.C., Y.L., H.Y., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.H.L., J.M.C., W.K.M.), Medical Research Collaborating Center (H.H.), Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, Republic of Korea (S.Y.K., N.C., Y.L., H.Y., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.H.L., J.M.C., W.K.M.); and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.Y.K., N.C., Y.L., H.Y., Y.S.K., A.R.P., S.M.H., S.H.L., J.M.C., W.K.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bahl M. Screening MRI in Women at Intermediate Breast Cancer Risk: An Update of the Recent Literature. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2022; 4:231-240. [PMID: 35783682 PMCID: PMC9233194 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbac021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Guidelines issued by the American Cancer Society (ACS) in 2007 recommend neither for nor against screening MRI in women at intermediate breast cancer risk (15%-20%), including those with dense breast tissue, a history of lobular neoplasia or atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), or a prior breast cancer, because of scarce supporting evidence about the utility of MRI in these specific patient populations. However, since the issuance of the ACS guidelines in 2007, multiple investigations have found that women at intermediate risk may be suitable candidates for screening MRI, given the high detection rates of early-stage cancers and acceptable false-positive rates. For women with dense breast tissue, the Dense Tissue and Early Breast Neoplasm Screening trial reported that the incremental cancer detection rate (CDR) by MRI exceeded 16 cancers per 1000 examinations but decreased in the second round of screening; this decrease in CDR, however, occurred alongside a marked decrease in the false-positive rate. For women with lobular neoplasia or ADH, single-institution retrospective analyses have shown CDRs mostly ranging from 11 to 16 cancers per 1000 MRI examinations, with women with lobular carcinoma in situ benefitting more than women with atypical lobular hyperplasia or ADH. For patients with a prior breast cancer, the cancer yield by MRI varies widely but mostly ranges from 8 to 20 cancers per 1000 examinations, with certain subpopulations more likely to benefit, such as those with dense breasts. This article reviews and summarizes more recent studies on MRI screening of intermediate-risk women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manisha Bahl
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiology, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kim MY, Suh YJ, An YY. Imaging surveillance for the detection of ipsilateral local tumor recurrence in patients who underwent oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery with acellular dermal matrix: abbreviated MRI versus conventional mammography and ultrasonography. World J Surg Oncol 2021; 19:290. [PMID: 34579740 PMCID: PMC8477561 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-021-02403-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the usefulness of surveillance-abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (AB-MRI) for the detection of ipsilateral local tumor recurrence (LTR) in patients who underwent oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) by comparing its diagnostic performance with that of mammography (MG) and ultrasonography (US). METHODS The postoperative MG, US, and AB-MRI findings of the ipsilateral breast and pathological results of 324 patients who underwent oncoplastic BCS using ADM were reviewed. The cancer detection rate (CDR), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) for biopsy, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) for each imaging modality were calculated. RESULTS A total of 8 ipsilateral LTRs were diagnosed, and most cancers (87.5%) were stage 0 or 1 (median size of invasive cancer, 1.44 cm; range, 0.7-2 cm). The CDRs of MG, US, MG + US, and AB-MRI were 0.009, 0.012, 0.015, and 0.025 per woman, respectively. Three cancers were detectable on only AB-MRI, and the additional CDR of AB-MRI was 0.010. The sensitivity and specificity of MG, US, MG + US, and AB-MRI were 37.5%, 50%, 62.5%, and 100% and 99.7%, 98.4%, 98.1%, and 97.8%, respectively. The PPVs for biopsy were 75%, 44.4%, 45.5%, and 53.3%, respectively. The AUC was significantly higher for AB-MRI (0.989) than for MG alone (0.686, P = 0.0009), US alone (0.742, P = 0.009), and MG + US (0.803, P = 0.04). A total of 66.7% of cancers visible on only AB-MRI were located at the deep posterior portion of the excision cavity, which might have been missed with MG or MG + US due to masking by the ADM filler. CONCLUSION AB-MRI can improve the detection of ipsilateral LTR despite postoperative changes caused by ADM fillers compared to conventional MG and US. Patients who undergo BCS with ADM can be candidates for AB-MRI surveillance considering improved cancer detection and high sensitivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mi Young Kim
- Department of Radiology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Jin Suh
- Department of Surgery, Division of Breast and Thyroid Surgical Oncology, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Yeong Yi An
- Department of Radiology, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Park VY, Kim MJ, Kim GR, Yoon JH. Outcomes Following Negative Screening MRI Results in Korean Women with a Personal History of Breast Cancer: Implications for the Next MRI Interval. Radiology 2021; 300:303-311. [PMID: 34032514 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021204217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Background There are limited data on outcomes following screening breast MRI in women with a personal history of breast cancer (PHBC). Purpose To investigate outcomes and factors associated with subsequent cancers following a negative screening MRI study in women with a PHBC. Materials and Methods Consecutive women with a PHBC and a negative prevalence screening breast MRI result between August 2014 and December 2016 were retrospectively identified. Inclusion criteria were prevalence screening MRI performed as part of routine surveillance protocol (1-3 years after treatment) and follow-up data for at least 12 months. The incidence and characteristics of subsequent cancers were reviewed. Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate associations between clinical-pathologic characteristics and subsequent cancers. Performance metrics were compared among screening MRI, mammography, and US. Results A total of 993 women (mean age ± standard deviation, 53 years ± 10) were evaluated. Ten second in-breast cancers (ie, ipsilateral or contralateral) occurred at a median interval of 31.8 months (range, 13.3-44.8 months) after MRI, of which eight (80%) were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or node-negative T1 cancers. Only one node-negative T1mi (tumor ≤1 mm) second in-breast cancer visible on a mammogram was detected within 24 months of MRI. Of second in-breast cancers, 40% (four of 10) were detected only at subsequent screening MRI, which was performed a median of 30.5 months after negative prevalence screening MRI. Ten local-regional recurrences occurred at a median interval of 16.9 months (range, 6-35 months). Previous treatment for DCIS was associated with second in-breast cancers (odds ratio, 3.73; 95% CI: 1.04, 13.38; P = .04). In 1048 women who underwent prevalence screening MRI (including all Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System categories), MRI showed a lower abnormal interpretation rate and higher specificity than mammography or US (P < .001 for all). Conclusion After a negative screening MRI result, 90% of subsequent cancers were detected at intervals longer than 24 months and there was a low second in-breast cancer rate (1%). © RSNA, 2021 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Chang in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivian Y Park
- From the Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University, College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, 03722 Seoul, Korea
| | - Min Jung Kim
- From the Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University, College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, 03722 Seoul, Korea
| | - Ga Ram Kim
- From the Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University, College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, 03722 Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung Hyun Yoon
- From the Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University, College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, 03722 Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sella T, Dowton AA, Meyer ME, Ruddy KJ, Yeh ED, Barry WT, Partridge AH. The utility of magnetic resonance imaging in early-stage breast cancer survivors-An institutional experience and literature review. Breast J 2020; 26:1673-1679. [PMID: 32754998 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.13997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Revised: 05/20/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
The role of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the screening of breast cancer survivors with remaining breast tissue is not well studied. We sought to evaluate the outcomes of screening breast MRI in a cohort of breast cancer survivors. A population of patients with history of stage I-IIIa breast cancer and ≥1 MRI a year or later from diagnosis between 2006-2008 were identified using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network data base from two large Boston-area cancer centers. Patient and disease characteristics were obtained from the data base, and medical records were reviewed to identify the index MRI (first eligible), indications, and two-year outcomes. Overall, 647 patients had breast MRI scans during the study period including 342 eligible patients whose index MRIs were done for breast screening purposes. 47/342 (13.7%) were abnormal, and 3.8% (13/342) underwent biopsy, resulting in the detection of 3 cases of locoregional recurrence or new primary breast cancer (0.9%, 95% CI = 0.2%-2.5%). Of 295 patients with a normal index screening MRI, 12 had a breast cancer recurrence diagnosed within 2 years (4.1% 95%CI = 2.1%-7.0%), and 5 of these recurrences were limited to MRI-screened breast tissue. No statistically significant difference in the rate of 2-year locoregional or distant recurrence was observed between patients with an abnormal screening MRI and those with a normal scan. Adjunct single breast MRI surveillance in a general population of breast cancer survivors one year after diagnosis detected few recurrences, and its effect on short-term outcomes was unclear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tal Sella
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Anne A Dowton
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Meghan E Meyer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kathryn J Ruddy
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Eren D Yeh
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - William T Barry
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ann H Partridge
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
An YY, Kim SH, Kang BJ, Suh YJ, Jeon YW. Feasibility of abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (AB-MRI) screening in women with a personal history (PH) of breast cancer. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0230347. [PMID: 32163500 PMCID: PMC7067463 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2019] [Accepted: 02/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the feasibility of abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging (AB-MRI) in women with a personal history (PH) of breast cancer as a screening tool. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 1880 screening AB-MRIs in 763 women with a PH of breast cancer (median age, 55 years; range, 23-89 years) between October 2015 and October 2016. The total acquisition times of AB-MRI were 8.3 min and 2.8 min with and without T2-weighted imaging, respectively. The tissue diagnosis or one-year follow-up status was used as the reference standard. The characteristics of tumor recurrences detected on AB-MRI screenings were analyzed. The cancer detection rates (CDRs) and additional CDRs for the 1st round and overall rounds of AB-MRI screening were calculated. The recall rate, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values for recall (PPV1) and biopsy (PPV3) for the 1st round of AB-MRI screening were calculated. The diagnostic performance of the combination of mammography and ultrasonography was compared with that of AB-MRI by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS Fifteen of a total of 21 recurrences were detected on the 1st round of AB-MRI screening: 93.3% were node-negative T1 tumors (median tumor size, 1.02 cm; range, 0.1-2 cm) or Tis; 66.7% were high-grade tumors; 8 of these 15 were mammographically and ultrasonographically occult. The CDR and additional CDR for the 1st round of AB-MRI screening were 0.019 and 0.010 per woman, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, recall rate, PPV1 and PPV3 for the 1st round of AB-MRI screening were 100%, 96.0%, 14.3%, 13.8% and 58.3%, respectively. For detecting secondary cancer, AB-MRI showed a higher sensitivity and PPV than the combination of mammography and ultrasonography (95.2%, 57.1% vs 47.6%, 38.5%). The area under the ROC curve was higher for AB-MRI (0.966; 95% CI: 0.951-0.978) than the combination of mammography and ultrasonography (0.727; 95% CI: 0.694-0.759) (P<0.0001). CONCLUSION AB-MRI improved cancer detection with a high specificity, sensitivity and PPV in women with a PH of breast cancer. AB-MRI could be a useful screening tool for detecting secondary cancer considering its high diagnostic performance and short examination time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yeong Yi An
- Department of Radiology, The Catholic University of Korea, St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, Suwon-si, Korea
| | - Sung Hun Kim
- Department of Radiology, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Bong Joo Kang
- Department of Radiology, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- * E-mail:
| | - Young Jin Suh
- Department of Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea, St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ye Won Jeon
- Department of Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea, St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Surveillance Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting the Second Breast Cancer in Women With a Personal History of Breast Cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2019; 43:937-942. [PMID: 31738203 DOI: 10.1097/rct.0000000000000931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting the secondary breast cancer among women with a personal history of the lesion. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed breast MRI examinations performed between 2007 and 2011. A total of 798 women with a history of breast cancer were included in the study. Cancer detection rate, positive predictive value (PPV), recall rate, sensitivity, and specificity were assed. Cancer detection rate was stratified by interval after surgery of the primary breast cancer. Also, we derived 1 comparison group from the women for comparing the performance of x-ray mammography, ultrasound, and MRI in detecting the second breast cancer. RESULTS Of the 798 patients, 47 of the 49 secondary breast carcinomas were detected by MRI. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI in detecting the secondary lesions were 95.9% and 96.3%, respectively. The recall rate was 9.5%, and the PPV was 61.8%. Cancer detection rate of MRI examinations performed at more than 36 months after initial surgery was significantly higher than that at 36 months or less after initial surgery (13.7% vs 3.6, P < 0.001). In comparison group, the sensitivity and specificity of MRI, mammography, and ultrasound were 96.7% and 96.1%, 48.4% and 93.9%, and 77.4% and 96.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Surveillance MRI for women with a personal history of breast cancer has high sensitivity in finding the secondary malignancies with a reasonable recall rate and PPV.
Collapse
|
13
|
Ha T, Jung Y, Kim J, Park S, Kang D, Kim T. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of abbreviated MRI and full diagnostic MRI using a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system in patients with a personal history of breast cancer: the effect of CAD-generated kinetic features on reader performance. Clin Radiol 2019; 74:817.e15-817.e21. [DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.06.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2019] [Accepted: 06/27/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
14
|
Kim SJ, Kim JY. An Unusual Cutaneous Recurrence of Carcinoma in the Mastectomy Bed and Its Imaging Features: A Case Report. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CASE REPORTS 2019; 20:800-805. [PMID: 31171763 PMCID: PMC6570996 DOI: 10.12659/ajcr.916609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Patient: Female, 44 Final Diagnosis: Cutaneous recurrence of carcinoma in the mastectomy bed Symptoms: Palpable lump Medication: — Clinical Procedure: — Specialty: Radiology
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suk Jung Kim
- Department of Radiology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, South Korea
| | - Ji Yeon Kim
- Department of Pathology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
The shape and contour of the lesion are shown to be effective features for physicians to identify breast tumor as benign or malignant. The region of the lesion is usually manually created by the physician according to their clinical experience; therefore, contouring tumors on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is difficult and time-consuming. For this purpose, an automatic contouring method for breast tumors was developed for less burden in the analysis and to decrease the observed bias to help in making decisions clinically. In this study, a multiview segmentation method for detecting and contouring breast tumors in MRI was represented. The preprocessing of the proposed method reduces any amount of noises but preserves the shape and contrast of the breast tumor. The two-dimensional (2D) level-set segmentation method extracts contours of breast tumors from the transverse, coronal, and sagittal planes. The obtained contours are further utilized to generate appropriate three-dimensional (3D) contours. Twenty breast tumor cases were evaluated and the simulation results show that the proposed contouring method was an efficient method for delineating 3D contours of breast tumors in MRI.
Collapse
|