1
|
Ozdemir S, Chaudhry I, Malhotra C, Teo I, Finkelstein EA. Goals of Care Among Patients With Advanced Cancer and Their Family Caregivers in the Last Years of Life. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e245866. [PMID: 38602677 PMCID: PMC11009823 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.5866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Understanding goals of care for terminally ill patients at the end of life is crucial to ensure that patients receive care consistent with their preferences. Objectives To investigate the patterns of goals of care among patient-caregiver dyads over the last years of the patient's life and the associations of the goals of care with patient-caregiver characteristics. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective cohort study of 210 patient-caregiver dyads involved surveys every 3 months from July 8, 2016, until the patient's death or February 28, 2022. Data from the last 2 years of the patients' lives were analyzed. Dyads, which comprised patients with stage IV solid cancer and their caregivers, were recruited from outpatient clinics at 2 major cancer centers in Singapore. Main Outcomes and Measures Goals of care were examined via the tradeoffs between life extension and symptom management and between life extension and cost containment. The actor-partner interdependence framework was implemented using mixed-effects linear regressions. Results This study included 210 dyads (patients: mean [SD] age, 62.6 [10.5] years; 108 men [51.4%]; caregivers: mean [SD] age, 49.4 [14.6] years; 132 women [62.9%]). On average, 34% of patients (264 of 780 observations; range, 23%-42%) and 29% of caregivers (225 of 780 observations; range, 20%-43%) prioritized symptom management over life extension, whereas 24% of patients (190 of 780 observations; range, 18%-32%) and 19% of caregivers (148 of 780 observations; range, 8%-26%) prioritized life extension. Between cost containment and life extension, on average, 28% of patients (220 of 777 observations; range, 22%-38%) and 17% of caregivers (137 of 780 observations; range, 10%-25%) prioritized cost containment, whereas 26% of patients (199 of 777 observations; range, 18%-34%) and 35% of caregivers (271 of 780 observations; range, 25%-45%) prioritized life extension. Goals of care did not change as patients approached death. Patients prioritized symptom management if they experienced higher symptom burden (average marginal effect [SE], 0.04 [0.01]), worse spiritual well-being (average marginal effect [SE], -0.04 [0.01]), and accurate (vs inaccurate) prognostic awareness (average marginal effect [SE], 0.40 [0.18]) and if their caregivers reported accurate prognostic awareness (average marginal effect [SE], 0.53 [0.18]), lower impact of caregiving on finances (average marginal effect [SE], -0.28 [0.08]), and poorer caregiving self-esteem (average marginal effect [SE], -0.48 [0.16]). Compared with patients, caregivers expressed lower preferences for cost containment (average marginal effect [SE], -0.63 [0.09]). Patients prioritized cost containment if they were older (average marginal effect [SE], 0.03 [0.01]), had higher symptom burden (average marginal effect [SE], 0.04 [0.01]), had poorer spiritual well-being (average marginal effect [SE], -0.04 [0.01]), and their caregivers reported poorer caregiving self-esteem (average marginal effect [SE], -0.51 [0.16]) and more family support (average marginal effect [SE], -0.30 [0.14]). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of patient-caregiver dyads, findings suggested the importance of interventions aimed at reducing discordance in goals of care between patients and caregivers and helping them develop realistic expectations to avoid costly, futile treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Semra Ozdemir
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Signature Programme in Health Services and System Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Isha Chaudhry
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Signature Programme in Health Services and System Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Chetna Malhotra
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Signature Programme in Health Services and System Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Irene Teo
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Signature Programme in Health Services and System Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore
| | - Eric Andrew Finkelstein
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Signature Programme in Health Services and System Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Balasubramanian I, Malhotra C. Why is end-of-life inpatient cost high among cancer patients? A prospective cohort study. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e7057. [PMID: 38457240 PMCID: PMC10923043 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Revised: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inpatient cost for cancer patients is high during the last year of life, but reasons for this are not understood. We aim to understand the type of hospital admissions and inpatient services associated with an increase in inpatient cost in last year of life. METHODS We used survey and billing records of 439 deceased patients with a solid metastatic cancer, enrolled in a prospective cohort study. Based on cost per day of inpatient admissions, we classified admissions as low- or high-intensity. We decomposed the inpatient cost into cost for different inpatient services. We examined the inpatient cost in the last year of life. We also assessed patient characteristics associated with higher inpatient cost in the next 3 months. RESULTS Towards death, proportion of inpatient cost for "maintenance care" increased while that for intensive care unit (ICU) and surgeries decreased. Low-intensity, compared to high-intensity admissions had a higher proportion of cost for "maintenance care" and a lower proportion for surgeries and ICU. Number of low-intensity admissions increased more steeply towards death than high-intensity admissions. Both admission types contributed equally to the share of inpatient cost. Older patients were less likely to have a high-intensity admission (β:-0.01, CI: -0.02, 0.00). Greater preference for life extension (β: 0.06, CI: 0.01, 0.11) and inaccurate prognostic belief were associated with higher cost of high-intensity admissions (β: 0.32, CI: 0.03, 0.62). CONCLUSIONS Findings suggest that inpatient costs in last year of life may be reduced if maintenance care is availed in low-cost settings such as hospice/palliative care alongside steps to reduce non-beneficial surgeries and ICU admissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chetna Malhotra
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke‐NUS Medical SchoolSingaporeSingapore
- Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke‐NUS Medical SchoolSingaporeSingapore
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ozdemir S, Ng S, Chaudhry I, Teo I, Malhotra C, Finkelstein EA. Caregiver-Reported Roles in Treatment Decision Making in Advanced Cancer and Associated Caregiving Burden and Psychological Distress: A Longitudinal Study. Med Decis Making 2023; 43:191-202. [PMID: 36113405 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x221125408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To longitudinally examine caregiver-reported treatment decision-making roles and to investigate the associations of these roles with caregiver burden, caregiving esteem, caregiver anxiety, and depression. METHODS 281 caregivers of patients with stage IV solid cancers were recruited from outpatient clinics in Singapore. Caregivers were eligible if they were aged ≥21 y, primary informal caregiver, and involved in treatment decision making. We used 3 y of longitudinal data. The decision-making roles were grouped into 4 categories: no family involvement, patient/physician-led, joint, and family-led/alone decision making. Mixed-effects linear regressions were used to assess associations between decision-making roles and caregiver outcomes. RESULTS On average, 72% of caregivers reported family involvement in decision making. Compared with baseline, a higher proportion of caregivers at the 36-mo follow-up reported no family involvement (from 23% to 34%, P = 0.05) and patient/physician-led decision making (from 22% to 34%, P = 0.02), while a lower proportion reported family-led/alone (from 19% to 7%, P = 0.01) decision making. Compared with family-led/alone decision making, caregivers reporting no family involvement reported lower impact on finances (-0.15 [-0.28, -0.01], P = 0.03) while caregivers who reported patient/physician-led decision making reported lower impact on schedule and health (-0.12 [-0.20, -0.03], P = 0.01), and finances (-0.15 [-0.28, -0.03], P = 0.02), and lower anxiety (-0.69 [-1.17, -0.22], P < 0.01), and depressive symptoms (-0.69 [-1.12, -0.26], P < 0.01). Caregivers who reported joint decision making reported higher caregiving esteem (0.07 [0.01, 0.14], P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Higher family involvement in decision making was associated with higher caregiver burden and psychological distress. Help should be given so that family caregivers can support patient decision-making in a meaningful way. HIGHLIGHTS Compared with baseline, a lower proportion of caregivers at the 36-mo follow-up reported family-led or family-alone decision making, and a higher proportion of caregivers reported patient-led or physician-led decision making.Higher levels of family involvement in decision making were associated with burdens on caregivers' daily life, health, and finances and increased caregiver anxiety and depression.Support must be given so that family members can contribute to making medical decisions in a rewarding manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Semra Ozdemir
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Signature Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sean Ng
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Signature Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Isha Chaudhry
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Signature Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Irene Teo
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Signature Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chetna Malhotra
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Signature Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Eric Andrew Finkelstein
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore.,Signature Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | -
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Signature Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ozdemir S, Chaudhry I, Tan SNG, Teo I, Malhotra C, Malhotra R, Finkelstein EA. Variation in Patient-Reported Decision-Making Roles in the Last Year of Life among Patients with Metastatic Cancer: A Longitudinal Study. Med Decis Making 2023; 43:203-213. [PMID: 36214321 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x221131305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We investigated the variation in patient-reported decision-making roles in the past year of life among patients with metastatic solid cancer and the associations of these roles with patient quality of life and perceived quality of care. METHODS We used the last year of life data of 393 deceased patients from a prospective cohort study. Patients reported their decision-making roles, quality of life (emotional well-being, spiritual well-being, and psychological distress) and perceived quality of care (care coordination and physician communication) every 3 months until death. We used mixed effects linear regressions to investigate the associations of decision-making roles with patients' quality of life and perceived quality of care. RESULTS The most reported roles, on average, were patient-led (37.9%) and joint (23.4%; with physicians and/or family caregivers) decision making, followed by no patient involvement (14.8%), physician/family-led (12.9%), and patient alone (11.0%) decision making. Patient level of involvement in decision making decreased slightly as death approached (P < 0.05). Compared with no patient involvement, joint decision making was associated with better emotional well-being (β [95% confidence interval] = 1.02 [0.24, 1.81]), better spiritual well-being (1.48 [0.01, 2.95]), lower psychological distress (-1.99 (-3.21, -0.77]), higher perceived quality of care coordination (5.04 [1.24, 8.85]), and physician communication (5.43 [1.27, 9.59]). Patient-led decision making was associated with better spiritual well-being (1.69 [0.24, 3.14]) and higher perceived quality of care coordination (6.87 [3.17, 10.58]) and physician communication (6.21 [2.15, 10.27]). CONCLUSION Joint and patient-led decision-making styles were reported by 61% of the patients and were associated with better quality of life and quality of care. A decrease in the level of patient involvement over time indicates reliance on family and physicians as death approached. HIGHLIGHTS Among patients with metastatic cancer, the level of patient involvement in decision making decreased slightly as death approached.Joint decision making of patients with their physicians and/or family caregivers and patient-led decision making were associated with better quality of life and perceived quality of care.Patients with metastatic cancer should be encouraged to be involved in decision making together with their physicians and/or family caregivers to potentially improve their end-of-life experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Semra Ozdemir
- Signature Program in Health Services and Systems Research; Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Isha Chaudhry
- Signature Program in Health Services and Systems Research; Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Si Ning Germaine Tan
- Signature Program in Health Services and Systems Research; Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Irene Teo
- Signature Program in Health Services and Systems Research; Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chetna Malhotra
- Signature Program in Health Services and Systems Research; Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Rahul Malhotra
- Signature Program in Health Services and Systems Research; Centre for Aging Research and Education, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Eric Andrew Finkelstein
- Signature Program in Health Services and Systems Research; Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore.,Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ozdemir S, Chaudhry I, Ng S, Teo I, Malhotra C, Finkelstein EA. Prognostic awareness and its association with health outcomes in the last year of life. Cancer Med 2023; 12:4801-4808. [PMID: 36200706 PMCID: PMC9972138 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Revised: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little research has examined changes in prognostic awareness (PA) in the last year of life and the extent PA change was associated with anxiety, depression, and spiritual well-being among metastatic cancer patients. METHODS Two surveys were administered in the last year of life to 176 conveniently sampled Singaporean patients with stage 4 solid cancers. PA was assessed by asking patients whether they were aware that their treatments were unlikely to cure their cancer. Multivariable linear regression models were used to investigate the association of PA change with anxiety, depression, and spiritual well-being. RESULTS The proportion of patients with accurate PA increased (39.2%-45.5%; p < 0.05) from the second-last assessment to the last assessment before death. Those with inaccurate PA decreased (26.1%-20.4%; p < 0.05) while a third of patients remained uncertain at both assessments (34.7% and 34.1%). Compared to patients with inaccurate PA at both assessments, patients who reported accurate PA at both assessments reported worsened anxiety (β = 2.08), depression (β = 3.87), and spiritual well-being (β = -4.45) while patients who reported being uncertain about their prognosis at both assessments reported worsened spiritual well-being (β = - 6.30) at the last assessment before death (p < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS Interventions should dually focus on decreasing prognostic uncertainty at the end-of-life while minimising the psychological and spiritual sequelae associated with being prognostically aware. More research is needed to clarify the causes of prognostic uncertainty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Semra Ozdemir
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Signature Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Isha Chaudhry
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Signature Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Sean Ng
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Signature Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Irene Teo
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Signature Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chetna Malhotra
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Signature Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Eric Andrew Finkelstein
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Signature Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore.,Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chaudhry I, Shafiq M, Teo I, Ozdemir S, Malhotra C. Epidemiology of Pain Among Patients with Solid Metastatic Cancer During the Last Year of Life. J Pain Res 2022; 15:2949-2956. [PMID: 36147456 PMCID: PMC9488613 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s375874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite medical advancements, pain is a major source of suffering at the end of life for patients with a solid metastatic cancer. We aimed to assess the trajectory of pain prevalence, severity, interference, and inadequacy of analgesia during the last year of life. Methods We analysed data from the last year of life of 345 decedents from a prospective cohort study of 600 patients with a solid metastatic cancer in Singapore. Patients were surveyed every 3 months and their pain outcomes (prevalence, severity, and interference) and inadequacy of analgesia were analysed. We used mixed-effects regressions to assess the association of pain outcomes with patients’ time from death, demographics, and planned or unplanned hospitalisations. Results Prevalence of pain was higher in the last 2 months (65%) compared to 11 to 12 months (41%) before death. Pain severity and interference scores (mean ± SD) were also higher in the last month (severity: 2.5±2.6; interference: 2.6±3.0) compared to 12 months before death (severity: 1.4±2.0; interference: 1.4±2.0). At any time during the last year of life, 38% of the patients were prescribed non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, 11% were prescribed weak-opioids and 29% were prescribed strong opioids. These analgesics were prescribed through either oral, topical or injectable route. Pain outcomes were significantly worse (p-value<0.05) for younger patients, those with higher education, and more financial difficulties, while interference was higher after an unplanned hospitalisation in the last month. Females reported higher pain severity score during their last year of life compared to males. For patients reporting moderate to severe pain, inadequacy of analgesia was lower in the last 2 months (43%) compared to 11 to 12 months before death (83%). Conclusion Findings highlight the need for greater attention in monitoring and treatment of pain even earlier in the disease trajectory, and increased attention to patients discharged from an unplanned hospitalisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isha Chaudhry
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Mahham Shafiq
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Irene Teo
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.,Health Services and System Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.,National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Semra Ozdemir
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.,Health Services and System Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chetna Malhotra
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.,Health Services and System Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Balasubramanian I, Finkelstein E, Malhotra R, Ozdemir S, Malhotra C. Healthcare Cost Trajectories in the Last 2 Years of Life Among Patients With a Solid Metastatic Cancer: A Prospective Cohort Study. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2022; 20:997-1004.e3. [PMID: 36075386 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.7038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most studies describe the "average healthcare cost trend" among patients with cancer. We aimed to delineate heterogeneous trajectories of healthcare cost during the last 2 years of life of patients with a metastatic cancer and to assess the associated sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and healthcare use. PATIENTS AND METHODS We analyzed a sample of 353 deceased patients from a cohort of 600 with a solid metastatic cancer in Singapore, and we used group-based trajectory modeling to identify trajectories of total healthcare cost during the last 2 years of life. RESULTS The average cost trend showed that mean monthly healthcare cost increased from SGD $3,997 during the last 2 years of life to SGD $7,516 during the last month of life (USD $1 = SGD $1.35). Group-based trajectory modeling identified 4 distinct trajectories: (1) low and steadily decreasing cost (13%); (2) steeply increasing cost in the last year of life (14%); (3) high and steadily increasing cost (57%); and (4) steeply increasing cost before the last year of life (16%). Compared with the low and steadily decreasing cost trajectory, patients with private health insurance (β [SE], 0.75 [0.37]; P=.04) and a greater preference for life extension (β [SE], -0.14 [0.07]; P=.06) were more likely to follow the high and steadily increasing cost trajectory. Patients in the low and steadily decreasing cost trajectory were most likely to have used palliative care (62%) and to die in a hospice (27%), whereas those in the steeply increasing cost before the last year of life trajectory were least likely to have used palliative care (14%) and most likely to die in a hospital (75%). CONCLUSIONS The study quantifies healthcare cost and shows the variability in healthcare cost trajectories during the last 2 years of life. Policymakers, clinicians, patients, and families can use this information to better anticipate, budget, and manage healthcare costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eric Finkelstein
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care.,Program in Health Services and Systems Research, and
| | - Rahul Malhotra
- Program in Health Services and Systems Research, and.,Centre for Ageing Research and Education, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Semra Ozdemir
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care.,Program in Health Services and Systems Research, and
| | - Chetna Malhotra
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care.,Program in Health Services and Systems Research, and
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Su J, Malhotra C. The cost of caring: How advanced cancer patients affect Caregiver's employment in Singapore. Psychooncology 2022; 31:1152-1160. [PMID: 35165978 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Revised: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With ageing populations and rising cancer incidence, more people are becoming informal caregivers. Informal caregivers are less likely to work than non-caregivers, yet little is known about how their employment changes over time. This study aimed to examine the association between decline in cancer patient's health (termed health shock) and caregiver's employment. A secondary aim was to assess characteristics of caregivers who stayed employed despite the health shock and the burden of caring for advanced stage cancer patients. METHOD This study used data from 270 dyads of advanced cancer patients and their caregivers who participated in the Cost of Medical Care of Patients with Advanced Serious Illness in Singapore study. The dyads were interviewed every 3 months for 2 years. Fixed-effects regression was used to analyse the association between patient health shock and two caregiver employment outcomes (i.e., employment status and work disruptions). RESULTS Ninety-seven% of caregivers whose patient experienced a health shock reported work disruptions. About 13% of caregivers whose patient experienced at least one health shock left employment, compared to 5% of those whose patient did not experience any health shock. Following a patient health shock, caregivers were significantly less likely to be employed (β: -0.03; 95% CI, -0.05 to -0.001) and more likely to experience work disruptions (β: 0.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.01 to 0.12). Caregivers who were young, educated, unmarried, not spousal caregivers, and not living with their patients were more likely to stay employed despite patient health shock (p < 0.01 for all). CONCLUSION Findings show that caregivers' employment is affected by their patients' health through the caregiving trajectory. Continuous support for caregivers catered to specific vulnerable subgroups may be important to keeping caregivers in the workforce.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmine Su
- Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Chetna Malhotra
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.,Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Malhotra C, Bundoc F, Chaudhry I, Teo I, Ozdemir S, Finkelstein E, Dent RA, Kumarakulasinghe NB, Cheung YB, Malhotra R, Kanesvaran R, Yee ACP, Chan N, Wu HY, Chin SM, Allyn HYM, Yang GM, Neo PSH, Harding R, Heng LL. A prospective cohort study assessing aggressive interventions at the end-of-life among patients with solid metastatic cancer. Palliat Care 2022; 21:73. [PMID: 35578270 PMCID: PMC9109395 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-022-00970-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Many patients with a solid metastatic cancer are treated aggressively during their last month of life. Using data from a large prospective cohort study of patients with an advanced cancer, we aimed to assess the number and predictors of aggressive interventions during last month of life among patients with solid metastatic cancer and its association with bereaved caregivers’ outcomes. Methods We used data of 345 deceased patients from a prospective cohort study of 600 patients. We surveyed patients every 3 months until death for their physical, psychological and functional health, end-of-life care preference and palliative care use. We surveyed their bereaved caregivers 8 weeks after patients’ death regarding their preparedness about patient’s death, regret about patient’s end-of-life care and mood over the last week. Patient data was merged with medical records to assess aggressive interventions received including hospital death and use of anti-cancer treatment, more than 14 days in hospital, more than one hospital admission, more than one emergency room visit and at least one intensive care unit admission, all within the last month of life. Results 69% of patients received at least one aggressive intervention during last month of life. Patients hospitalized during the last 2–12 months of life, male patients, Buddhist or Taoist, and with breast or respiratory cancer received more aggressive interventions in last month of life. Patients with worse functional health prior to their last month of life received fewer aggressive interventions in last month of life. Bereaved caregivers of patients receiving more aggressive interventions reported feeling less prepared for patients’ death. Conclusion Findings suggest that intervening early in the sub-group of patients with history of hospitalization prior to their last month may reduce number of aggressive interventions during last month of life and ultimately positively influence caregivers’ preparedness for death during the bereavement phase. Trial registration NCT02850640. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-022-00970-z.
Collapse
|
10
|
See F, Teo I, Malhotra C. Longitudinal trajectories of caregiving experiences among primary informal caregivers of patients with metastatic solid cancer (Stage IV). Psychooncology 2022; 31:1161-1168. [PMID: 35199404 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Revised: 12/14/2021] [Accepted: 02/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cancer is a significant cause of mortality worldwide. The diagnosis of advanced cancer affects both patients and their family caregivers. Understanding the course of both negative and positive experiences of caregiving provides a more comprehensive understanding of the caregiving experience. The study aims to identify joint trajectories of burden and esteem among family caregivers of patients with solid metastatic cancer, and to identify caregiver characteristics that predict membership for each delineated trajectory. METHODS A prospective longitudinal study of 346 informal family caregivers of patients with solid metastatic cancer were recruited between July 2016 and December 2019. Surveys were conducted every 3 months for 2 years. We assessed caregiver burden and positive aspects of caregiving using the modified Caregiver Reaction Assessment. We estimated the joint trajectories for these outcomes using group-based multi-trajectory modelling. RESULTS We identified 4 trajectories describing caregivers with 1) low burden, moderate esteem (38.3%), 2) low burden, high esteem (20.3%), 3) high burden, low esteem (16.4%), 4) high burden, high esteem (24.9%). Compared to the "low burden, high esteem" trajectory, male and non-spousal caregivers were more likely to experience high burden and esteem while caregivers from low socioeconomic status were more likely to belong to trajectories with a high burden. CONCLUSION Recognising caregivers at high risk of belonging to trajectories with high burden or low esteem may enable healthcare professionals to anticipate and provide appropriate support to mitigate the impact of negative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faith See
- Lien Center for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Blk 541 Pasir Ris St 51 #04-14, Singapore, 169857
| | - Irene Teo
- Lien Center for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Rd, Singapore
| | - Chetna Malhotra
- Lien Center for Palliative Care, Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore National Cancer Center, 8 College Road, Level 4, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Malhotra C, Malhotra R, Bundoc F, Teo I, Ozdemir S, Chan N, Finkelstein E. Trajectories of Suffering in the Last Year of Life Among Patients With a Solid Metastatic Cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2021; 19:1264-1271. [PMID: 34492633 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.7014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 01/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reducing suffering at the end of life is important. Doing so requires a comprehensive understanding of the course of suffering for patients with cancer during their last year of life. This study describes trajectories of psychological, spiritual, physical, and functional suffering in the last year of life among patients with a solid metastatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a prospective cohort study of 600 patients with a solid metastatic cancer between July 2016 and December 2019 in Singapore. We assessed patients' psychological, spiritual, physical, and functional suffering every 3 months until death. Data from the last year of life of 345 decedents were analyzed. We used group-based multitrajectory modeling to delineate trajectories of suffering during the last year of a patient's life. RESULTS We identified 5 trajectories representing suffering: (1) persistently low (47% of the sample); (2) slowly increasing (14%); (3) predominantly spiritual (21%); (4) rapidly increasing (12%); and (5) persistently high (6%). Compared with patients with primary or less education, those with secondary (high school) (odds ratio [OR], 3.49; 95% CI, 1.05-11.59) education were more likely to have rapidly increasing versus persistently low suffering. In multivariable models adjusting for potential confounders, compared with patients with persistently low suffering, those with rapidly increasing suffering had more hospital admissions (β=0.24; 95% CI, 0.00-0.47) and hospital days (β=0.40; 95% CI, 0.04-0.75) during the last year of life. Those with persistently high suffering had more hospital days (β=0.70; 95% CI, 0.23-1.17). CONCLUSIONS The course of suffering during the last year of life among patients with cancer is variable and related to patients' hospitalizations. Understanding this variation can facilitate clinical decisions to minimize suffering and reduce healthcare costs at the end of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chetna Malhotra
- 1Lien Centre for Palliative Care.,2Program in Health Services and Systems Research, and
| | - Rahul Malhotra
- 2Program in Health Services and Systems Research, and.,3Centre for Ageing Research and Education, Duke-NUS Medical School
| | | | - Irene Teo
- 1Lien Centre for Palliative Care.,4National Cancer Centre Singapore; and
| | - Semra Ozdemir
- 1Lien Centre for Palliative Care.,2Program in Health Services and Systems Research, and
| | - Noreen Chan
- 5Division of Palliative Care, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore
| | - Eric Finkelstein
- 1Lien Centre for Palliative Care.,2Program in Health Services and Systems Research, and
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Shafiq M, Malhotra R, Teo I, Ozdemir S, Kanesvaran R, Malhotra C. Trajectories of physical symptom burden and psychological distress during the last year of life in patients with a solid metastatic cancer. Psychooncology 2021; 31:139-147. [PMID: 34432911 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Revised: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To delineate the trajectories of physical symptoms and psychological distress among patients with a solid metastatic cancer during the last year of life. METHODS We used data of 345 decedents from a prospective cohort of 600 patients with a Stage IV solid cancer. Using group-based trajectory modelling, we assessed (a) demographic (age, gender, education, cancer site) predictors of trajectory membership, (b) shift in trajectories associated with planned and unplanned hospitalizations, emergency room visits and chemotherapy, and (c) the association between trajectory membership and place of death. RESULTS We identified three trajectories of physical symptoms-"persistent mild" (56%), "progressive moderate" (36%), and "progressive severe" (8%), and two for psychological distress-"persistent mild" (72%) and "progressive distress" (28%). Females (β = 1.40 [SE = 0.55], p-value = 0.01) and highly educated patients (β = 1.46 [SE = 0.62], p-value = 0.02) were more likely to experience progressive severe symptoms compared to persistent mild symptoms. Older patients were less likely (β = -1.01 [SE = 0.33], p-value = 0.003), while those with gynecological cancers (β = 1.51 [SE = 0.65], p-value = 0.02) were more likely to experience progressive distress compared to persistent mild distress. Planned and unplanned hospitalizations, emergency room visits, and chemotherapy were associated with a worsening in trajectories. Patients with higher distress were more likely to die in a hospice compared to a hospital. CONCLUSIONS Interventions to improve physical symptoms and distress can focus on patients at risk of being in worse trajectories and at critical time points in the last year of life-hospitalizations, emergency room visits, and chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Irene Teo
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.,National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | | | | | -
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Malhotra C, Koh LE, Teo I, Ozdemir S, Chaudhry I, Finkelstein E. A Prospective Cohort Study of Stability in Preferred Place of Death Among Patients With Stage IV Cancer in Singapore. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2021; 20:20-28. [PMID: 34359020 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.7795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advance care planning (ACP) involves documentation of patients' preferred place of death (PoD). This assumes that patients' preferred PoD will not change over time; yet, evidence for this is inconclusive. We aimed to assess the extent and correlates of change in patients' preferred PoD over time. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using data from a cohort study of patients with advanced cancer in Singapore, we analyzed preferred PoD (home vs institution including hospital, hospice, and nursing home vs unclear) among 466 patients every 6 months for a period of 2 years. At each time point, we assessed the proportion of patients who changed their preferred PoD from the previous time point. Using a multinomial logistic regression model, we assessed patient factors (demographics, understanding of disease stage, ACP, recent hospitalization, quality of life, symptom burden, psychologic distress, financial difficulty, prognosis) associated with change in their preferred PoD. RESULTS More than 25% of patients changed their preferred PoD every 6 months, with no clear trend in change toward home or institution. Patients psychologically distressed at the time of the survey had increased likelihood of changing their preferred PoD to home (relative risk ratio [RRR], 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.05) and to an institution (RRR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02-1.10) relative to no change in preference. Patients hospitalized in the past 6 months were more likely to change their preferred PoD to home (RRR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.07-2.29) and less likely to change to an institution (RRR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.28-0.88) relative to no change in preference. CONCLUSIONS The present study provides evidence of instability in the preferred PoD of patients with advanced cancer. ACP documents need to be updated regularly to ensure they accurately reflect patients' current preference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chetna Malhotra
- 1Lien Centre for Palliative Care, and.,2Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School; and
| | - Ling En Koh
- 1Lien Centre for Palliative Care, and.,2Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School; and
| | - Irene Teo
- 1Lien Centre for Palliative Care, and.,2Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School; and.,3Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Semra Ozdemir
- 1Lien Centre for Palliative Care, and.,2Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School; and
| | - Isha Chaudhry
- 1Lien Centre for Palliative Care, and.,2Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School; and
| | - Eric Finkelstein
- 1Lien Centre for Palliative Care, and.,2Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School; and
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ozdemir S, Ng S, Malhotra C, Teo I, Finkelstein EA. Patient-Caregiver Treatment Preference Discordance and Its Association With Caregiving Burden and Esteem. Innov Aging 2021; 5:igab020. [PMID: 34316519 PMCID: PMC8306724 DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igab020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives Many patient–caregiver dyads report conflicting treatment decisions regarding preferences for life extension treatments and symptom management. It is possible that this discordance will lead to negative psychological outcomes including lowered caregiving esteem and increased caregiver burden. However, the relationships between treatment discordance among dyads and caregiver psychological outcomes are not well studied among advanced cancer patients—a gap this study aims to fill. Research Design and Methods Outcome variables included caregiver burden and caregiving esteem, measured via a modified 4-domain Caregiver Reaction Assessment Scale. The main independent variable was patient–caregiver treatment preference discordance, examined using questions adapted from an existing protocol. Analyses were conducted using multivariable regressions. Results A convenience sample of 285 patient–caregiver dyads were recruited from outpatient clinics at 2 tertiary hospitals in Singapore. The majority (60%) of patient–caregiver dyads reported discordant treatment preferences. Discordance in this study arose because caregivers wanted a balance between life extension and symptom management while patients preferred life-extending treatment. In multivariable analyses, discordance predicted caregiver burden arising from impact on caregiver schedule and health (β = 0.16, p = .07) and lack of family support (β = 0.13, p = .04). Discussion and Implications Theoretically, this study provided a more nuanced understanding of how dyad discordance may worsen the burdens felt by caregivers, and which aspects of their lives (i.e., burden due to impact of caregiver schedule and health and lack of family support) are most affected. Our findings can aid in establishing therapeutic interventions targeted toward improving communication skills and encouraging end-of-life discussions among patients, caregivers, and their health care providers. The importance of establishing and improving therapy programs specifically targeted toward caregivers was also underlined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Semra Ozdemir
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Signature Programme in Health Services and System Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Sean Ng
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Signature Programme in Health Services and System Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Chetna Malhotra
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Signature Programme in Health Services and System Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Irene Teo
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Eric A Finkelstein
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Signature Programme in Health Services and System Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Doble B, Wong WHM, Finkelstein E. End-of-life cost trajectories and the trade-off between treatment costs and life-extension: Findings from the Cost and Medical Care of Patients with Advanced Serious Illness (COMPASS) cohort study. Palliat Med 2021; 35:893-903. [PMID: 33730947 DOI: 10.1177/0269216321999576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies have assessed how patient preferences influence end-of-life costs. AIM To estimate mean monthly healthcare costs in 2019 Singapore Dollars (SGD) at five time points within the last year of life and identify how patients' preferences for the trade-off between treatment cost containment and life-extension and other factors affect these costs. DESIGN Mean monthly costs were quantified in the last 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12-months before death. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS Billing records for 286 deceased participants in the Cost and Medical Care of Patients with Advanced Serious Illness (COMPASS) cancer cohort study in Singapore. RESULTS Mean monthly costs were $5140 (95% CI: $4750; $5520) in the 12-months before death and rose to $8350 (95% CI: $7110; $9590) 1-month before death. Participants preferring higher cost containment/less life-extension defied the trend of increasing costs closer to death (mean monthly costs of $4630 (95% CI: $3690; $ 5580) and $4850 (95% CI: $2850; $6850) (12-months and 1-month before death respectively). Participants preferring lower cost containment/more life-extension had costs that were $1050 (95% CI: $49; $2051) and $5220 (95% CI: $2320; $8130) higher than those preferring lower costs/less life-extension 12-months and 1-month before death respectively. CONCLUSIONS On average, cancer patients in Singapore can expect to spend $61,680 in the last year of life. Of broader relevance is that patient preferences and other observable factors clearly influence these costs, suggesting that policymakers and patients can better predict and budget for end-of-life costs by considering these factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brett Doble
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Programme for Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Wei Han Melvin Wong
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Programme for Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Eric Finkelstein
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Programme for Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Malhotra C, Chaudhry I, Ozdemir S, Teo I, Kanesvaran R. Experiences with health care practitioners among advanced cancer patients and their family caregivers: A longitudinal dyadic study. Cancer 2021; 127:3002-3009. [PMID: 33878215 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2020] [Revised: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Assessing patient and caregiver experiences with care is central to improving care quality. The authors assessed variations in the experiences of advanced cancer patients and their caregivers with physician communication and care coordination by patient and caregiver factors. METHODS The authors surveyed 600 patients with a stage IV solid malignancy and 346 caregivers every 3 months for more than 2 years. Patients entered the cohort any time during their stage IV trajectory. The analytic sample was restricted to patient-caregiver dyads (n = 299). Each survey assessed patients' experiences with physician communication and care coordination; patients' symptom burden; caregivers' quality of life; and patients' and caregivers' anxiety, financial difficulties, and perceptions of treatment goals. An actor-partner interdependence framework was used for analysis. RESULTS Patients reported better physician communication (average marginal effect [AME], 6.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.82 to 8.26) and care coordination (AME, 8.96; 95% CI, 6.94 to 10.97) than their caregivers. Patients reported worse care coordination when they (AME, -0.56; 95% CI, -1.07 to -0.05) or their caregivers (AME, -0.58; 95% CI, -0.97 to -0.19) were more anxious. Caregivers reported worse care coordination when they were anxious (AME, -1.62; 95% CI, -2.02 to -1.23) and experienced financial difficulties (AME, -2.31; 95% CI, -3.77 to -0.86). Correct understanding of the treatment goal (vs being uncertain) was associated with caregivers reporting physician communication as better (AME, 3.67; 95% CI, 0.49 to 6.86) but with patients reporting it as worse (AME, -3.29; 95% CI, -6.45 to -0.14). CONCLUSIONS Patients' and caregivers' reports of physician communication and care coordination vary with aspects of their own and each other's well-being and with their perceptions of treatment goals. These findings may have implications for improving patients' and caregivers' reported experiences with health care practitioners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chetna Malhotra
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.,Health Services and System Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Isha Chaudhry
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.,Health Services and System Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Semra Ozdemir
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.,Health Services and System Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Irene Teo
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.,Health Services and System Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.,National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Discordance Between Advanced Cancer Patients' Perceived and Preferred Roles in Decision Making and its Association with Psychological Distress and Perceived Quality of Care. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2021; 14:581-589. [PMID: 33569723 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-020-00480-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/05/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We investigated patient-reported roles of families, physicians, and patients themselves in treatment decision making and whether discordance between perceived and preferred roles is associated with psychological distress and perceived quality of care among patients with cancer. METHODS We analyzed cross-sectional survey data from 599 adults with stage IV solid malignancy in Singapore. Stuart-Maxwell tests were used to compare patients' perceived and preferred roles in decision making. Types of discordance were categorized as follows: involvement at a lesser level than preferred, involvement at a greater level than preferred, and no change in patient involvement. Ordinary least squares regressions examined the associations between types of discordance and patient outcomes, controlling for patient characteristics. RESULTS Discordance between perceived and preferred roles was observed in 16% of patients. Amongst patients with discordance, 33% reported being involved at a lesser level than they preferred, 47% reported being involved at a greater level than they preferred, and 19% reported discordance where level of patient involvement did not change. Multivariable analyses showed that lesser involvement than preferred and discordance with no change in patient involvement were associated with poorer quality of physician communication (β = - 9.478 [95% confidence interval {CI} - 16.303 to - 2.653] and β = - 9.184 [95% CI - 18.066 to - 0.301]) and poorer care coordination (β = - 11.658 [95% CI - 17.718 to - 5.597] and β = - 8.856 [95% CI - 16.744 to - 0.968]) compared with concordance. CONCLUSIONS Most patients reported participating at their desired level. Despite this finding, our results suggest that involving patients at a lesser level than they prefer can lead to poorer perceived quality of physician communication and care coordination and that encouraging patient participation is a safe approach to minimizing poor outcomes.
Collapse
|
18
|
Ong KJ, Lim MYY, Chng JXR, Wong YP, Koh LH. Collateral Damage: How the COVID-19 Pandemic Has Affected the Dying Process of Palliative Care Patients in Hospitals—Our Experience and Recommendations. ANNALS OF THE ACADEMY OF MEDICINE, SINGAPORE 2020. [DOI: 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2020151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
19
|
Malhotra C, Vishwanath P, Yong JR, Østbye T, Seow D, Yap P, Tan LL, Tham WY, Vaingankar J, Foo J, Tan BY, Tong K, Ng WC, Allen Jr JC, Malhotra R, Tan WM, Wee SL, Ng LL, Goveas R, Mok V, Sim A, Ng WF, Wong HK, Balasundaram B, Tan RQ, Ong PS, Cheong CY, Yee Chung Pheng A, Tiong C, Hum A, Lee A, Finkelstein EA. A Prospective Longitudinal Study of Caregivers of Community Dwelling Persons with Severe Dementia (PISCES): Study Protocol. J Alzheimers Dis 2020; 75:403-416. [DOI: 10.3233/jad-190897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Chetna Malhotra
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
- Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | | | - Jing Rong Yong
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Truls Østbye
- Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Dennis Seow
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Phillip Yap
- Geriatric Centre, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore
| | - Lay Ling Tan
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore
| | | | | | - Jason Foo
- Alzheimer’s Disease Association, Singapore
| | | | - Kamun Tong
- Post-acute & Continuing Care, Jurong Community Hospital, Singapore
| | - Wai Chong Ng
- Hua Mei Centre for Successful Ageing, Tsao Foundation, Singapore
| | | | - Rahul Malhotra
- Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
- Centre for Ageing Research and Education (CARE), Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | | | - Shiou Liang Wee
- Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
- Geriatric Education and Research Institute, Alexandra Health Pte Ltd, Singapore
| | - Li Ling Ng
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Richard Goveas
- Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore
| | - Vanessa Mok
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Alisson Sim
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Wei Fern Ng
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Hon Khuan Wong
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore
| | | | - Rui Qi Tan
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Pui Sim Ong
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore
| | | | | | | | | | - Angel Lee
- St. Andrew’s Community Hospital, Singapore
| | - Eric A. Finkelstein
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
- Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wilson CM, Stiller CH, Doherty DJ, Thompson KA, Smith AB, Turczynski KL. Physical therapists in integrated palliative care: a qualitative study. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2020; 12:e59-e67. [PMID: 32079576 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-002161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2019] [Revised: 01/20/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to explore the perceptions and experiences of physical therapists (PTs) regarding their role in palliative care (PC) when practising in nations with advanced integration of PC into mainstream healthcare. METHODS This qualitative study included an electronic demographic survey and semistructured interview. Data analysis included descriptive statistics for demographics and the constant comparative method for interview results. RESULTS Thirteen PTs from eight nations identified four categories of roles and responsibilities: (1) working with patients and families, (2) being an interdisciplinary team (IDT) member, (3) professional responsibilities beyond direct patient care and (4) factors influencing the role of PTs in PC. Concepts identified were shifting priorities (increased family involvement, emphasis on psychosocial aspects and differences in care philosophy), care across the continuum (accommodating changes in patient status, increasing awareness of PTs' role in varying disease states and working with the IDT) and changing perceptions about PT in PC (perceptions of PTs/others regarding PTs' role in PC and professional responsibilities of the PT in PC). CONCLUSIONS Based on participant responses, a previously published conceptual framework by Wilson et al in 2017 was updated and included an increased emphasis on patient wishes and dignity, treating breathlessness, patient advocacy within their family and use of technology and networking. Within PC, PTs play a key role on the IDT and can improve quality of life; however, multiple barriers exist to providing PT care within PC. Further advocacy is needed from PTs and professional organisations to integrate these services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher M Wilson
- Human Movement Science department - Physical Therapy Program, Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan, USA .,Physical and Occupational Therapy, Beaumont Health, Troy, Michigan, USA
| | - Christine H Stiller
- Human Movement Science department - Physical Therapy Program, Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan, USA
| | - Deborah J Doherty
- Human Movement Science department - Physical Therapy Program, Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan, USA
| | - Kristine A Thompson
- Human Movement Science department - Physical Therapy Program, Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan, USA
| | - Alexander B Smith
- Human Movement Science department - Physical Therapy Program, Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan, USA
| | - Kelly L Turczynski
- Human Movement Science department - Physical Therapy Program, Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Malhotra C, Harding R, Teo I, Ozdemir S, Koh GCH, Neo P, Lee LH, Kanesvaran R, Finkelstein E. Financial difficulties are associated with greater total pain and suffering among patients with advanced cancer: results from the COMPASS study. Support Care Cancer 2019; 28:3781-3789. [PMID: 31832824 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-05208-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2019] [Accepted: 11/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Universal Health Coverage goals call for access to affordable palliative care to reduce inequities in "total pain" and suffering. To achieve this, a patient-centred understanding of these inequities is required. AIM To assess association of total pain and suffering (i.e. physical, psychological, social, and spiritual health outcomes) and perceived health care quality with financial difficulties among stage IV solid malignancy patients. DESIGN Using baseline data from the COMPASS cohort study, we assessed total pain and suffering including physical (physical and functional well-being, pain, symptom burden), psychological (anxiety, depression, emotional well-being), social (social well-being), and spiritual (spiritual well-being, hope) outcomes and perceived health care quality (physician communication, nursing care, and coordination/responsiveness). Financial difficulties were scored by assessing patient perception of the extent to which their resources were meeting expenses for their treatments, daily living, and other obligations. We used multivariable linear/logistic regression to test association between financial difficulties and each patient-reported outcome. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS Six hundred stage IV solid malignancy patients in Singapore. RESULTS Thirty-five percent reported difficulty in meeting expenses. A higher financial difficulties score was associated with worse physical, psychological, social, spiritual outcomes, and lower perceived quality of health care coordination and responsiveness (i.e. greater total pain and suffering) (all p < 0.05). These associations persisted after adjustment for socio-economic indicators. CONCLUSION Results identify advanced cancer patients with financial difficulties to be a vulnerable group with greater reported total pain and suffering. A holistic patient-centred approach to care at end-of-life may help meet goals for Universal Health Coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chetna Malhotra
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore. .,Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
| | - Richard Harding
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Irene Teo
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.,Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.,National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Semra Ozdemir
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.,Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Gerald C H Koh
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Patricia Neo
- National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Lai Heng Lee
- Department of Haematology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Eric Finkelstein
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.,Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Teo I, Baid D, Ozdemir S, Malhotra C, Singh R, Harding R, Malhotra R, Yang MG, Neo SHS, Cheung YB, Neo PSH, Kanesvaran R, Kumarakulasinghe NB, Lee LH, Koh GCH, Finkelstein EA. Family caregivers of advanced cancer patients: self-perceived competency and meaning-making. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2019; 10:435-442. [PMID: 31806656 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-001979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2019] [Revised: 10/03/2019] [Accepted: 11/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer have been reported to provide long hours of care and be at risk for poor psychological outcomes. Although research has focused on the nature of caregiving burden, little attention has been paid to identifying protective factors that improve caregiver psychological outcomes. AIM We examined the relationship between caregivers' time spent caregiving and the following psychological outcomes: anxiety, depression and caregiving esteem. Subsequently, we explored the main and moderating effects of caregiver-perceived self-competency and sense of meaning on caregiver psychological outcomes. DESIGN/PARTICIPANTS Cross-sectional analysis was conducted using the baseline data from an ongoing cohort study. Family caregivers of advanced cancer patients (n=287) were recruited from two tertiary hospitals in Singapore. RESULTS Time spent caregiving was not significantly associated with caregiver anxiety, depression or caregiving esteem. However, significant main effects of self-competency on anxiety and caregiving esteem; and sense of meaning on anxiety, depression and caregiving esteem were observed. Moderator analyses further indicated that self-competency attenuated the positive relationship between time spent caregiving and anxiety, while sense of meaning attenuated the negative relationship between time spent caregiving and caregiving esteem. CONCLUSION Greater perceived self-competency and sense of meaning are related to better caregiver psychological outcomes, and protect caregivers from worsening outcomes as caregiving hours increase. Our findings suggest that screening caregivers for distress is an important part of care, and that supportive interventions for caregivers should aim to enhance their perceived caregiving competencies and the ability to make meaning of their caregiving role.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Teo
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore .,Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.,Program in Health Services & Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Drishti Baid
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Semra Ozdemir
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Program in Health Services & Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Chetna Malhotra
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Program in Health Services & Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Ratna Singh
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Richard Harding
- Department of Palliative Care and Policy, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Rahul Malhotra
- Program in Health Services & Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Centre for Aging Research and Education, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Meijuan Grace Yang
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Shirlyn Hui-Shan Neo
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yin Bun Cheung
- Program in Health Services & Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Center for Child Health Research, Tampere University, Tampere, Pirkanmaa, Finland
| | - Patricia Soek Hui Neo
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | | | | | - Lai Heng Lee
- Department of Haematology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Gerald Choon Huat Koh
- Program in Health Services & Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Eric A Finkelstein
- Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.,Program in Health Services & Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sompratthana T, Phoolcharoen N, Schmeler KM, Lertkhachonsuk R. End-of-life symptoms and interventions among women with gynecologic cancers in a tertiary-care hospital in Thailand. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2019; 29:ijgc-2019-000338. [PMID: 31079059 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2019] [Revised: 04/04/2019] [Accepted: 04/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Studies have shown improved patient quality of life with supportive care rather than aggressive treatment at the end of life. This study evaluated the symptoms that patients in Thailand with gynecologic cancers experienced and the interventions that they received at the end of life. METHODS The medical records of patients admitted to a tertiary cancer center in Thailand who died in the hospital from gynecologic malignancies between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2016 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were patients who had been been diagnosed with gynecologic cancers (ovarian, endometrial, cervical, vulvar, or peritoneal cancers or uterine sarcomas) and had died in the hospital during that period. Patients whose medical records were incomplete or unavailable were excluded from the study. Data on demographics, symptoms, interventions, and end-of-life care were collected. RESULTS A total of 159 patients were included in this analysis. The mean age at death was 54.3 (range 15-91) years. Over half (54.7%) of the patients were diagnosed with ovarian or peritoneal cancer, 26.4% with uterine cancer or sarcoma, 16.4% with cervical cancer, and 1.3% with dual primary cancers. Symptoms at time of admission were poor oral intake (68.6%), abdominal distention or discomfort (63.5%), pain (42.8%), nausea or vomiting (35.2%), and fever or signs of infection (27.0%). The mean number of hospitalizations during the last 6 months was 3.6. Thirty-six patients (22.6%) had major surgery during the last 6 months of life, with 14 patients (8.8%) having it performed during their last admission before death. The mean length of the last hospital stay was 22.3 (range 6-31) days, and 61 patients (38.4%) were admitted to the intensive care unit. Eleven patients (6.9%) had chemotherapy in their last 14 days of life and 10 (6.3%) received cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Almost all patients (153, 96.2%) had do-not-resuscitate (DNR) consents. The mean time between the DNR consent and death was 6.3±9.7 days. CONCLUSION Multiple hospital admissions, aggressive treatments, and invasive procedures were common among patients with gynecologic cancer at the end of life. Better symptom management, end-of-life preparation, and communication are needed to enhance patients' quality of life in Thailand.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thanchanok Sompratthana
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Natacha Phoolcharoen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Kathleen M Schmeler
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ruangsak Lertkhachonsuk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|