Trastuzumab Emtansine (T-DM1) and stereotactic radiation in the management of HER2+ breast cancer brain metastases

Local control and toxicity after stereotactic radiotherapy in brain metastases patients and the impact of novel systemic treatments

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Treatment modalities for patients with brain metastases consist of surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic treatments such as immunotherapy and targeted therapy. Although much is known about local control of brain metastases after radiotherapy and surgery alone, more understanding is needed of the additional effect of new systemic treatments. Our study presents real-world data about the combined effects of different local and systemic treatment strategies on local response of irradiated brain metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective consecutive cohort study of patients that presented with brain metastases in our institution between June 2018 and May 2020, reporting the impact of radiotherapy alone versus radiotherapy combined with systemic treatment on local control of irradiated brain metastases and toxicity. Chemotherapy and targeted therapy were temporarily discontinued around irradiation.

RESULTS

262 consecutively treated patients were included in the study. Median time to local failure of irradiated brain metastases was 18 months (IQR 9-34), median overall survival was 20 months (IQR 10-36). 211 (81 %) patients received systemic treatment. Patients with breast cancer had a worse local control (HR 2.3, 95 % CI 1.0-5.0, p = 0.038), as did patients without any systemic treatment (HR 2.1, 95 % CI 1.1-4.3, p = 0.034). Symptomatic radiation necrosis occurred in 36 (14 %) patients. A diameter > 2.5 cm was associated with a higher risk of radiation necrosis. No association was found between systemic treatment in combination with local radiotherapy and symptomatic radiation necrosis.

CONCLUSION

Patients who received any form of systemic treatment had better local control after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases. We did not find an association between systemic treatment and the incidence of radiation necrosis.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases from human epidermal receptor 2 positive breast Cancer: an international, multi-center study

PURPOSE

To report patient outcomes and local tumor control rates in a cohort of patients with biopsy-proven HER-2 positive breast cancer treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BM).

METHODS

This international, retrospective, multicenter study, included 195 female patients with 1706 SRS-treated BM. Radiologic and clinical outcomes after SRS were determined and prognostic factors identified.

RESULTS

At SRS, median patient age was 55 years [interquartile range (IQR) 47.6-62.0], and 156 (80%) patients had KPS ≥ 80. The median tumor volume was 0.1 cm3 (IQR 0.1-0.5) and the median prescription dose was 16 Gy (IQR 16-18). Local tumor control (LTC) rate was 98%, 94%, 93%, 90%, and 88% at six-, 12-, 24-, 36- and 60-months post-SRS, respectively. On multivariate analysis, tumor volume (p = < 0.001) and concurrent pertuzumab (p = 0.02) improved LTC. Overall survival (OS) rates at six-, 12-, 24-, 36-, 48-, and 60-months were 90%, 69%, 46%, 27%, 22%, and 18%, respectively. Concurrent pertuzumab improved OS (p = 0.032). In this patient subgroup, GPA scores ≥ 2.5 (p = 0.038 and p = 0.003) and rare primary tumor histologies (p = 0.01) were associated with increased and decreased OS, respectively. Asymptomatic adverse radiation events (ARE) occurred in 27 (14.0%) and symptomatic ARE in five (2.6%) patients. Invasive lobular carcinoma primary (p = 0.042) and concurrent pertuzumab (p < 0.001) conferred an increased risk for overall but not for symptomatic ARE.

CONCLUSION

SRS affords effective LTC for selected patients with BM from HER-2 positive breast cancer. Concurrent pertuzumab improved LTC and OS but at the same time increased the risk for overall, but not symptomatic, ARE.

A Case Report on Trastuzumab Emtansine (T-DM1) in a Patient With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases: Long-Term Treatment and Survival

Breast cancer remains the most common cancer in women worldwide. Among women with breast cancer, brain metastases are very prevalent among HER2-positive and affect those in the advanced stages of the disease. Various factors, including molecular subtypes, performance status, extracranial disease status, leptomeningeal metastasis, and the number of lesions, significantly influence the prognosis of patients with brain metastases from breast cancer (BCBrM). Understanding and addressing the specific risks associated with different breast cancer subtypes is crucial for developing tailored and effective medical treatments. This report presents a case of a breast cancer patient with recurrent disease and brain metastases who achieved long-term survival following a treatment regimen that included radiotherapy and a T-DM1 biosimilar.

Factors associated with overall survival in breast cancer patients with leptomeningeal disease (LMD): a single institutional retrospective review

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer-related leptomeningeal disease (BC-LMD) is a dire diagnosis for 5-8% of patients with breast cancer (BC). We conducted a retrospective review of BC-LMD patients diagnosed at Moffitt Cancer Center from 2011 to 2020, to determine the changing incidence of BC-LMD, factors which are associated with the progression of BC CNS metastasis to BC-LMD, and factors which are associated with OS for patients with BC-LMD.

METHODS

Patients with BC and brain/spinal metastatic disease were identified. For those who eventually developed BC-LMD, we used Kaplan-Meier survival curve, log-rank test, univariable, and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model to identify factors affecting time from CNS metastasis to BC-LMD and OS.

RESULTS

128 cases of BC-LMD were identified. The proportion of BC-LMD to total BC patients was higher between 2016 and 2020 when compared to 2011-2015. Patients with HR+ or HER2 + BC experienced longer times between CNS metastasis and LMD than patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Systemic therapy and whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) was associated with prolonged progression to LMD in all patients. Hormone therapy in patients with HR + BC were associated with a delayed BC-CNS metastasis to LMD progression. Lapatinib treatment was associated with a delayed progression to LMD in patients with HER2 + BC. Patients with TNBC-LMD had shorter OS compared to those with HR + and HER2 + BC-LMD. Systemic therapy, intrathecal (IT) therapy, and WBRT was associated with prolonged survival for all patients. Lapatinib and trastuzumab therapy was associated with improved OS in patients with HER2 + BC-LMD.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing rates of BC-LMD provide treatment challenges and opportunities for clinical trials. Prospective trials testing lapatinib and/or similar tyrosine kinase inhibitors, IT therapies, and combination treatments are urgently needed.

The promise and challenges of combination therapies with antibody-drug conjugates in solid tumors

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent an important class of cancer therapies that have revolutionized the treatment paradigm of solid tumors. To date, many ongoing studies of ADC combinations with a variety of anticancer drugs, encompassing chemotherapy, molecularly targeted agents, and immunotherapy, are being rigorously conducted in both preclinical studies and clinical trial settings. Nevertheless, combination therapy does not always guarantee a synergistic or additive effect and may entail overlapping toxicity risks. Therefore, understanding the current status and underlying mechanisms of ADC combination therapy is urgently required. This comprehensive review analyzes existing evidence concerning the additive or synergistic effect of ADCs with other classes of oncology medicines. Here, we discuss the biological mechanisms of different ADC combination therapy strategies, provide prominent examples, and assess their benefits and challenges. Finally, we discuss future opportunities for ADC combination therapy in clinical practice.

Efficacy and Safety of Radiotherapy Combined with Pyrotinib in the Treatment of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer with Brain Metastases

Purpose

To explore the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib combined with different radiotherapy modes in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer (BC) patients with brain metastasis (BM).

Patients and Methods

This study is a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with BM who underwent treatment with pyrotinib between November 2018 and April 2023. A total of 66 patients were administered radiotherapy in conjunction with pyrotinib (Group A), while 26 patients received pyrotinib as a standalone treatment (Group B). Within Group A, 18 patients underwent conventional fractionated radiotherapy (2Gy/F), while 48 patients received hyperfractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) (≥3Gy/F). The primary endpoints were intracranial progression-free survival (IC-PFS) and overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR).

Results

The ORR of Group A was 54.5% (36/66), while the ORR of Group B was 34.6% (9/26) (P= 0.047). The CBR of Group A was 89.4% (59/66) and that of Group B was 69.2% (18/26) (P= 0.041). The IC-PFS between Group A and Group B were 12 months and 8 months, respectively (P< 0.001), and the OS were 20 months and 16 months, respectively (P= 0.065). In Group A, the IC-PFS and OS between the conventional fractionation radiotherapy group and the HFRT group were 10 months and 12 months, respectively (P= 0.001) and 16 months and 24 months, respectively (P< 0.001). No serious adverse reactions were observed in Group A and Group B.

Conclusion

For HER2-positive BC patients with BM, it is recommended to adopt the treatment mode of HFRT combined with pyrotinib, which can improve the local control and survival of patients.

Risk-Based Therapeutic Strategies for HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer: A Consensus Paper

Breast cancer represents the most commonly diagnosed neoplasm worldwide and the HER2-positive subtype accounts for nearly 1 in 5 breast cancers. The majority of patients with breast cancer present with an early-stage disease upon diagnosis, which is thus susceptible to virtually curative treatment strategies. For a stage, I T1a/b N0 HER2-positive disease, upfront surgery followed by adjuvant therapy is the preferred approach. However, there is some uncertainty regarding the appropriate management of stage cT1c cN0, as both the neoadjuvant approach and upfront surgery have been proven to be feasible therapeutic options. The aim of this Delphi consensus was to define the best strategies for the treatment of early HER2-positive breast cancer. This work may help clinicians in the management of early HER2-positive breast cancer.

Safety profile of trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) with concurrent radiation therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In recent years, the treatment landscape for breast cancer has undergone significant advancements, with the introduction of several new anticancer agents. One such agent is trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), an antibody drug conjugate that has shown improved outcomes in both early and advanced breast cancer. However, there is currently a lack of comprehensive evidence regarding the safety profile of combining T-DM1 with radiation therapy (RT). In this study, we aim to provide a summary of the available data on the safety of combining RT with T-DM1 in both early and metastatic breast cancer settings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis project is part of the consensus recommendations by the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) Guidelines Committee on integrating RT with targeted treatments for breast cancer. A thorough literature search was conducted using the PUBMED/MedLine, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify original studies focusing on the safety profile of combining T-DM1 with RT.

RESULTS

After applying eligibility criteria, nine articles were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled data from these studies revealed a high incidence of grade 3 + radionecrosis (17%), while the rates of grade 3 + radiation-related pneumonitis (<1%) and skin toxicity (1%) were found to be very low.

CONCLUSION

Although there is some concern regarding a slight increase in pneumonitis when combining T-DM1 with postoperative RT, the safety profile of this combination was deemed acceptable for locoregional treatment in non-metastatic breast cancer. However, caution is advised when irradiating intracranial sites concurrently with T-DM1. There is a pressing need for international consensus guidelines regarding the safety considerations of combining T-DM1 and RT for breast cancer.

Tucatinib and stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of HER2 positive breast cancer brain metastases

PURPOSE

HER2-positive breast cancer has a high risk of brain metastasis. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is standard of care for limited brain metastases. Tucatinib, a HER2-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated intracranial efficacy in the HER2-CLIMB Trial. However, it is unknown whether tucatinib with SRS is safe or effective.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of HER2-positive breast cancer treated with SRS and tucatinib for brain metastases management was performed. All patients received tucatinib and SRS for the management of active brain metastases. The primary endpoint was local and distant brain tumor control. Secondary endpoints were intracranial progression free survival (CNS-PFS), systemic PFS, overall survival (OS), and neurotoxicity.

RESULTS

A total of 135 lesions treated with SRS over 39 treatment sessions in 22 patients were identified. Median follow-up from tucatinib initiation was 20.8 months. Local brain control was 94% at 12-months and 81% at 24-months. Distant brain control was 39% at 12-months and 26% at 24-months. Median survival was 21.2 months, with 12- and 24-month OS rates of 84% and 50%, respectively. Median CNS-PFS was 11.3 months, with 12- and 24-month CNS-PFS rates of 44.9% at both time points. Median systemic PFS was not reached, with 12- and 24-month systemic PFS rates of 86% and 57%, respectively. Symptomatic radiation necrosis occurred in 6 (4%) lesions. No additional unexpected toxicities were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

SRS in combination with tucatinib, capecitabine, and trastuzumab appears to be a safe and feasible treatment for HER2 + brain metastases. Further prospective evaluation of potential synergistic effects is warranted.

A Review of Advances in Radiotherapy in the Setting of Esophageal Cancers

Esophageal cancer is the eighth most common cancer worldwide and is the sixth most common cause of cancer-related mortality. The paradigm has shifted to include a multimodality approach with surgery, chemotherapy, targeted therapy (including immunotherapy), and radiation therapy. Advances in radiotherapy through techniques such as intensity modulated radiotherapy and proton beam therapy have allowed for the more dose homogeneity and improved organ sparing. In addition, recent studies of targeted therapies and predictive approaches in patients with locally advanced disease provide clinicians with new approaches to modify multimodality treatment to improve clinical outcomes.

Factors improving overall survival in breast cancer patients with leptomeningeal disease (LMD): A single institutional retrospective review

Background

Breast cancer-related leptomeningeal disease (BC-LMD) is a dire diagnosis for 5-8% of patients with breast cancer (BC). We conducted a retrospective review of BC-LMD patients diagnosed at Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC) from 2011-2020, to determine the changing incidence of BC-LMD, which factors impact progression of BC CNS metastasis to BC-LMD, and which factors affect OS for patients with BC-LMD.

Methods

Patients with BC and brain/spinal metastatic disease were identified. For those who eventually developed BC-LMD, we used Kaplan-Meier survival curve, log-rank test, univariable, and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model to identify factors affecting time from CNS metastasis to BC-LMD and OS.

Results

128 cases of BC-LMD were identified. The proportion of BC-LMD to total BC patients was higher between 2016-2020 when compared to 2011-2015. Patients with HR + or HER2 + BC experienced longer times between CNS metastasis and LMD than patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Systemic therapy and whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) prolonged progression to LMD in all patients. Hormone therapy in patients with HR + BC delayed BC-CNS metastasis to LMD progression. Lapatinib delayed progression to LMD in patients with HER2 + BC. Patients with TNBC-LMD had shorter OS compared to those with HR + and HER2 + BC-LMD. Systemic therapy, intrathecal (IT) therapy, and WBRT prolonged survival for all patients. Lapatinib and trastuzumab improved OS in patients with HER2 + BC-LMD.

Conclusions

Increasing rates of BC-LMD provide treatment challenges and opportunities for clinical trials. Trials testing lapatinib and/or similar tyrosine kinase inhibitors, IT therapies, and combination treatments are urgently needed.

Sacituzumab govitecan and radiotherapy in metastatic, triple-negative, and BRCA-mutant breast cancer patient with active brain metastases: A case report

Background

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive cancer subtype, owing to its high metastatic potential: Patients who develop brain metastases (BMs) have a poor prognosis due to the lack of effective systemic treatments. Surgery and radiation therapy are valid options, while pharmacotherapy still relies on systemic chemotherapy, which has limited efficacy. Among the new treatment strategies available, the antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) sacituzumab govitecan has shown an encouraging activity in metastatic TNBC, even in the presence of BMs.

Case presentation

A 59-year-old woman was diagnosed with early TNBC and underwent surgery and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy. A germline pathogenic variant in BReast CAncer gene 2 (BRCA2) was revealed after genetic testing. After 11 months from the completion of adjuvant treatment, she had pulmonary and hilar nodal relapse and began first-line chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel. However, after only 3 months from starting the treatment, she experienced relevant disease progression, due to the appearance of numerous and symptomatic BMs. Sacituzumab govitecan (10 mg/kg) was started as second-line treatment as part of the Expanded Access Program (EAP). She reported symptomatic relief after the first cycle and received whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) concomitantly to sacituzumab govitecan treatment. The subsequent CT scan showed an extracranial partial response and a near-to-complete intracranial response; no grade 3 adverse events were reported, even if sacituzumab govitecan was reduced to 7.5 mg/kg due to persistent G2 asthenia. After 10 months from starting sacituzumab govitecan, a systemic disease progression was documented, while intracranial response was maintained.

Conclusions

This case report supports the potential efficacy and safety of sacituzumab govitecan in the treatment of early recurrent and BRCA-mutant TNBC. Despite the presence of active BMs, our patient had a progression-free survival (PFS) of 10 months in the second-line setting and sacituzumab govitecan was safe when administered together with radiation therapy. Further real-world data are warranted to confirm sacituzumab govitecan efficacy in this patient population.

Radiotherapeutic Strategies to Overcome Resistance of Breast Cancer Brain Metastases by Considering Immunogenic Aspects of Cancer Stem Cells

Breast cancer is the most diagnosed cancer in women, and symptomatic brain metastases (BCBMs) occur in 15-20% of metastatic breast cancer cases. Despite technological advances in radiation therapy (RT), the prognosis of patients is limited. This has been attributed to radioresistant breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs), among other factors. The aim of this review article is to summarize the evidence of cancer-stem-cell-mediated radioresistance in brain metastases of breast cancer from radiobiologic and radiation oncologic perspectives to allow for the better interpretability of preclinical and clinical evidence and to facilitate its translation into new therapeutic strategies. To this end, the etiology of brain metastasis in breast cancer, its radiotherapeutic treatment options, resistance mechanisms in BCSCs, and effects of molecularly targeted therapies in combination with radiotherapy involving immune checkpoint inhibitors are described and classified. This is considered in the context of the central nervous system (CNS) as a particular metastatic niche involving the blood-brain barrier and the CNS immune system. The compilation of this existing knowledge serves to identify possible synergistic effects between systemic molecularly targeted therapies and ionizing radiation (IR) by considering both BCSCs' relevant resistance mechanisms and effects on normal tissue of the CNS.

Efficacy and safety of pyrotinib and radiotherapy vs. pyrotinib-based therapy in patients with HER2+ breast cancer with brain metastasis: a retrospective cohort study

Background

At present, local therapy, such as surgery and radiotherapy, is the mainstay treatment for brain metastasis and anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2)-targeted therapy has been shown to be efficacious for HER2⁺ breast cancer (BC) patients with brain metastasis. However, Clinical studies comparing the combined effects of the two treatments are lacking. This study sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib and radiotherapy versus pyrotinib-based therapy in treating HER2⁺ BC patients with brain metastasis.

Methods

This retrospective, observational study collected data from 79 HER2⁺ BC patients with brain metastasis who received pyrotinib-based therapy from May 2018 to December 2021. Among these patients, 35 received pyrotinib-based therapy concurrently with, or within 3 months before or after, brain radiotherapy (Group A), and 44 received pyrotinib-based therapy as the primary regimen (with no restriction as to whether they had received brain radiotherapy previously or not, the interval between receiving radiotherapy and receiving pyrotinib was >3 months) (Group B). Patient information was collected by the Electronic Medical Records System. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR), the clinical benefit rate (CBR), and safety. The assessment of adverse effects was based on CTCAE5.0.

Results

The intracranial ORRs were 48.6% in Group A and 20.5% (9/44) in Group B (P=0.015). The intracranial CBRs were 80.0% in Group A and 65.9% in Group B. The median intracranial PFS times (IC-PFS) were 15.0 months and 9.0 months in Group A and Group B, respectively (P=0.385). There was no statistically significant difference in OS between the 2 groups (95.0 vs. 98.0 months, P=0.872). The subgroup analysis showed that patients with active brain metastasis who received pyrotinib and radiotherapy had a longer IC-PFS time than those who received pyrotinib-based therapy(P=0.056). No serious adverse reactions (e.g., acute brain edema, cognitive dysfunction, or treatment-related death events) were observed.

Conclusions

Pyrotinib combined with radiotherapy is recommended for HER2⁺ breast cancer active brain metastasis patients who can tolerate radiotherapy and pyrotinib. Pyrotinib-based therapy may be considered for patients who cannot tolerate radiotherapy and pyrotinib.

Ways to improve breast cancer patients' management and clinical outcome: The 2020 Assisi Think Tank Meeting

We report on the third Assisi Think Tank Meeting (ATTM) on breast cancer, a brainstorming project which involved European radiation and clinical oncologists who were dedicated to breast cancer research and treatment. Held on February 2020, the ATTM aimed at identifying key clinical questions in current clinical practice and "grey" areas requiring research to improve management and outcomes. Before the meeting, three key topics were selected: 1) managing patients with frailty due to either age and/or multi-morbidity; 2) stereotactic radiation therapy and systemic therapy in the management of oligometastatic disease; 3) contralateral breast tumour prevention in BCRA-mutated patients. Clinical practice in these areas was investigated by means of an online questionnaire. In the lapse period between the survey and the meeting, the working groups reviewed data, on-going studies and the clinical challenges which were then discussed in-depth and subjected to intense brainstorming during the meeting; research protocols were also proposed. Methodology, outcome of discussions, conclusions and study proposals are summarized in the present paper. In conclusion, this report presents an in-depth analysis of the state of the art, grey areas and controversies in breast cancer radiation therapy and discusses how to confront them in the absence of evidence-based data to guide clinical decision-making.

CSCO expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer brain metastasis

Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies among women worldwide. According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer, breast cancer affected more Chinese women than any other cancer in 2020. The brain is an increasingly common metastatic sites of breast cancer. Although the risk of developing brain metastases (BMs) is lower in breast cancer than in lung cancer and melanoma, due to its high prevalence, it is the second most common cause of BM among solid tumors, being second only to lung cancer. The incidence of breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM) differs by molecular subtype. Half of patients with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive and one-third of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) develop BM. The clinical manifestations of leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) are often non-specific and may manifest as a variety of signs and symptoms, mainly including brain parenchyma involvement and meningeal irritation syndromes cranial nerve involvement, increased intracranial pressure, and progressive brain dysfunction. Therefore, the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) Breast Cancer Committee has developed this expert consensus on BM, in an effort to improve the overall prognosis of BCBM and promote the standardized diagnosis and treatment of this disease. During the development of this expert consensus, we carried out a comprehensive literature review and referred to some of the most authoritative guidelines in China and abroad. In this consensus, we will discuss clinical manifestations, imaging examinations, pathological diagnosis, treatments, prognosis, follow-up and monitoring. We hope this consensus will be of help to all the clinicians majored in breast cancer and other similar professions.

Treatment of breast cancer brain metastases: radiotherapy and emerging preclinical approaches

The breast is one of the common primary sites of brain metastases (BM). Radiotherapy for BM from breast cancer may include whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), but a consensus is difficult to reach because of the wide and varied protocols, indications, and outcomes of these interventions. Overall, dissemination of disease, patient functional status, and tumor size are all important factors in the decision of treatment with WBRT or SRS. Thus far, previous studies indicate that WBRT can improve tumor control compared to SRS, but increase side effects, however no randomized trials have compared the efficacy of these therapies in BM from breast cancer. Therapies targeting long non-coding RNAs and transcription factors, such as MALAT1, HOTAIR, lnc-BM, TGL1, and ATF3, have the potential to both prevent metastatic spread and treat BM with improved radiosensitivity. Given the propensity for HER2+ breast cancer to develop BM, the above-mentioned cell lines may represent an important target for future investigations, and the development of everolimus and pyrotinib are equally important.

Radiotherapy for HER 2 Positive Brain Metastases: Urgent Need for a Paradigm Shift

Brain metastases (BMs) are common among patients affected by HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (>30%). The management of BMs is usually multimodal, including surgery, radiotherapy, systemic therapy and palliative care. Standard brain radiotherapy (RT) includes the use of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for limited disease and whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for extensive disease. The latter is an effective palliative treatment but has a reduced effect on brain local control and BM overall survival, as it is also associated with severe neurocognitive sequelae. Recent advances both in radiation therapy and systemic treatment may change the paradigm in this subset of patients who can experience long survival notwithstanding BMs. In fact, in recent studies, SRT for multiple BM sites (>4) has shown similar efficacy when compared to irradiation of a limited number of lesions (one to three) without increasing toxicity. These findings, in addition to the introduction of new drugs with recognized intracranial activity, may further limit the use of WBRT in favor of SRT, which should be employed for treatment of both multiple-site BMs and for oligo-progressive brain disease. This review summarizes the supporting literature and highlights the need for optimizing combinations of the available treatments in this setting, with a particular focus on radiation therapy.

Improving Brain Metastases Outcomes Through Therapeutic Synergy Between Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Targeted Cancer Therapies

Brain metastases are the most common form of brain cancer. Increasing knowledge of primary tumor biology, actionable molecular targets and continued improvements in systemic and radiotherapy regimens have helped improve survival but necessitate multidisciplinary collaboration between neurosurgical, medical and radiation oncologists. In this review, we will discuss the advances of targeted therapies to date and discuss findings of studies investigating the synergy between these therapies and stereotactic radiosurgery for non-small cell lung cancer, breast cancer, melanoma, and renal cell carcinoma brain metastases.

Central Nervous System Metastases

The proportion of patients developing central nervous system (CNS) metastasis is increasing. Most are identified once symptomatic. Surgical resection is indicated for solitary or symptomatic brain metastases, separation surgery for compressive radioresistant spinal metastases, and instrumentation for unstable spinal lesions. Surgical biopsies are performed when histological diagnoses are required. Stereotactic radiosurgery is an option for limited small brain metastases and radioresistant spinal metastases. Whole-brain radiotherapy is reserved for extensive brain metastases and leptomeningeal disease with approaches to reduce cognitive side effects. Radiosensitive and inoperable spinal metastases typically receive external beam radiotherapy. Systemic therapy is increasingly being utilized for CNS metastases.

Integration of Systemic Therapy and Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases

Simple Summary

In the multi-modal treatment of brain metastasis (BM), the role of systemic therapy has undergone a recent revolution. Due to the development of multiple agents with modest central nervous system penetration of the blood-brain barrier, targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors are increasingly being utilized alone or in combination with radiation therapy. However, the adoption of sequential or concurrent strategies varies considerably, and treatment strategies employed in clinical practice have rapidly outpaced evidence development. Therefore, this review critically analyzes the data regarding combinatorial approaches for a variety of systemic therapeutics with stereotactic radiosurgery and provides an overview of ongoing clinical trials.

Abstract

Brain metastasis (BM) represents a common complication of cancer, and in the modern era requires multi-modal management approaches and multi-disciplinary care. Traditionally, due to the limited efficacy of cytotoxic chemotherapy, treatment strategies are focused on local treatments alone, such as whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and resection. However, the increased availability of molecular-based therapies with central nervous system (CNS) penetration now permits the individualized selection of tailored systemic therapies to be used alongside local treatments. Moreover, the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), with demonstrated CNS activity has further revolutionized the management of BM patients. The rapid introduction of these cancer therapeutics into clinical practice, however, has led to a significant dearth in the published literature about the optimal timing, sequencing, and combination of these systemic therapies along with SRS. This manuscript reviews the impact of tumor biology and molecular profiles on the management paradigm for BM patients and critically analyzes the current landscape of SRS, with a specific focus on integration with systemic therapy. We also discuss emerging treatment strategies combining SRS and ICIs, the impact of timing and the sequencing of these therapies around SRS, the effect of corticosteroids, and review post-treatment imaging findings, including pseudo-progression and radiation necrosis.

Capecitabine and stereotactic radiation in the management of breast cancer brain metastases

Background

Little is known about the safety and efficacy of concurrent capecitabine and stereotactic radiotherapy in the setting of breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM).

Methods

Twenty-three patients with BCBM underwent 31 stereotactic sessions to 90 lesions from 2005 to 2019 with receipt of capecitabine. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and distant intracranial control (DIC) from the date of stereotactic radiation. Imaging was independently reviewed by a neuro-radiologist.

Results

Median follow-up from stereotactic radiation was 9.2 months. Receptor types of patients treated included triple negative (n = 7), hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2- (n = 7), HR+/HER2+ (n = 6), and HR−/HER2+ (n = 3). Fourteen patients had stage IV disease prior to BCBM diagnosis. The median number of brain metastases treated per patient was 3 (1 to 12). The median dose of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was 21 Gy (range: 15–24 Gy) treated in a single fraction and for lesions treated with fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (FSRT) 25 Gy (24–30 Gy) in a median of 5 fractions (range: 3–5). Of the 31 stereotactic sessions, 71% occurred within 1 month of capecitabine. No increased toxicity was noted in our series with no cases of radionecrosis. The 1-year OS, LC, and DIC were 46, 88, and 30%, respectively.

Conclusions

In our single institution experience, we demonstrate stereotactic radiation and capecitabine to be a safe treatment for patients with BCBM with adequate LC. Further study is needed to determine the potential synergy between stereotactic radiation and capecitabine in the management of BCBM.