Determinants of illness-specific social support and its relation to distress in long-term melanoma survivors

Lived Experiences of Pregnant Women With Cancer in South Korea: A Qualitative Study

PURPOSE

The incidence of cancer during pregnancy is increasing, presenting several challenges to the treatment of cancer in pregnant women. However, research focusing on the lived experiences of pregnant women with cancer in South Korea is limited. This study aimed to explore and describe the day-to-day lived experiences of women diagnosed with or treated for cancer during pregnancy and their husbands.

METHODS

The study employed a qualitative descriptive design and utilized purposive sampling to recruit participants. The participants comprised six women living in Korea diagnosed with cancer during pregnancy and one husband of a female participant. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted, audiotaped, and transcribed. Five of the participants agreed to a second interview, resulting in a total of 12 individual interviews. A thematic analysis was then performed. The participants' ages ranged from 31 to 40 years, and their diagnoses during pregnancy were either breast or thyroid cancer.

RESULTS

Four main themes were identified: (1) Participants faced various heart-breaking difficulties maintaining their pregnancies throughout cancer treatment; (2) Pregnant women with cancer experienced complex but responsible feelings toward their children; (3) Patients with cancer also fulfilled their roles as parents even with their own diseases; and (4) Family support had a significant impact on the pregnant women to overcome the path.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings provide a comprehensive understanding of the lived experiences of being diagnosed with cancer during pregnancy. A recommended strategy is to develop a nursing education program for pregnant women with cancer to provide necessary information and support, and to help them cope positively with their situation.

The relationship between social support, self-efficacy, and asthma outcomes in older adults

OBJECTIVE

There has been a call for research examining factors that influence asthma outcomes in older adults because of the notable disparities observed in this age group. Social support and self-efficacy are resources that factor into asthma outcomes. The current study aimed to examine the relationship between these resources (independently and jointly) and asthma control and quality of life.

METHODS

Older adults with moderate-severe asthma were recruited from NYC. Data were obtained during in-person interviews via validated measures of social support, asthma self-efficacy, asthma control, and asthma quality of life. Linear regression evaluated self-efficacy in the relationship between social support and asthma outcomes.

RESULTS

In a sample of 359 older adults (M = 68.04, 47.9% Hispanic, 26.5% Black, and 25.6% other), social support had an inverse association with asthma control. As social support increased, asthma control decreased (β = 0.95, t(356) = -3.13, p = .002). Self-efficacy significantly moderated this relationship (β = 0.01, t(356) = 2.37, p = .018). For individuals with low or moderate asthma self-efficacy, more received social support was associated with worse asthma control (β = -0.33, t(356) = -4.66, p < .0001; β = -0.20, t(356) = -3.21, p = .0014, respectively). For individuals with high self-efficacy, no relationship was found between received social support and asthma control (β = -0.10, t(356)= -1.20, p =.23). For asthma quality of life, higher levels of received social support were associated with worse quality of life (β = -0.88, t(356) = -2.64, p = .009), but this association was not significantly moderated by self-efficacy (β = 0.01, t(356) = 1.90, p = .0582).

CONCLUSIONS

For older adults with asthma, receiving more social support is associated with worse asthma outcomes, especially for older adults with lower asthma self-efficacy.

[Development of a Psychosocial Online Self-Help Program for Cancer Patients: A Patient-Oriented Approach]

AIM OF THE STUDY

Involving potential end users in the development process of digital interventions makes it possible to ensure that these programs meet the needs, requirements and expectations of future users, which in turn has a positive impact on acceptance and adherence. This contribution presents a participatory development approach for the patient-centered design of the psycho-oncological online self-help epos, which aims to provide support in coping with cancer.

METHODS

Patients were involved in the developmental process at two points. At an early stage of development, semi-standardized in-depth interviews were conducted with patients diagnosed by different types of cancer (N=10) and were qualitatively evaluated with regard to their view of (1) the cancer disease and (2) the design of an online self-help on the content, structural and design levels. At a later stage, a prototype of the online self-help was evaluated in a pilot phase.

RESULTS

The qualitative analysis of the interviews with a total of N=742 codings resulted in five main content categories (changes in everyday life and future experience, changes in social relationships, processing mechanisms, loss of control, difficult emotions), which provide information about the central challenges and burdens of people with cancer. Participants showed particularly strong emotions around interpersonal concerns, so in addition to the emotion-based focus, the online self-help also included a focus on social relationships. Structural and design implications for development related primarily to clarity and user-friendliness. The pilot phase allowed evaluating whether the requirements for the online self-help that were described by cancer patients at an early stage of development were met.

CONCLUSION

Patient participation in the development process of the digital online self-help epos provided information for the design at various levels. Involving potential end users in several development phases can ensure that the requirements and suggestions have been sufficiently considered not only from the perspective of the developers, but also from the perspective of future users. These findings confirm the importance of a patient-centered approach in the development of digital offerings.

Psychosocial stress of dermatology inpatients and their relatives - Comparison of patients with and without cancer

BACKGROUND

In the clinical treatment pathways of certified oncological centers, psychotherapeutic services are mandatory. Although patients with somatic, non-oncological illnesses show an equally high prevalence of psychosocial stress, these guidelines do not exist for the general hospital sector. Are these patients really less burdened and is psychological support only needed in individual cases? The example of dermatological patients will be used to show whether the need for psychosocial care and the desire for support vary between individuals with and without malignant disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using the Hornheider screening instrument and distress thermometer, 216 dermatological inpatients assessed their psychosocial stress and that of a close relative. In addition, they were asked about their desire for support and preferred support provider.

RESULTS

i) Patients without skin cancer were more frequently and more severely distressed than cancer patients. ii) Patients of both groups assessed their relatives to be approximately equally distressed. Compared with their own distress, cancer patients assessed their relatives as more frequently and on average more severely distressed. More than 50 % of all patients regarded their own disease as the cause of their relatives' distress. iii) The desire for support in both groups was about 18 %. iv) Doctors and psychologists were usually named as potential contact persons.

CONCLUSIONS

The expansion of psychosocial support services for non-tumor patients and their relatives seems necessary. The establishment of appropriate screening methods should be considered. Further studies in other clinical areas are required.

Personalised health education against health damage of COVID-19 epidemic in the elderly Hungarian population (PROACTIVE-19): protocol of an adaptive randomised controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Early reports indicate that COVID-19 may require intensive care unit (ICU) admission in 5-26% and overall mortality can rise to 11% of the recognised cases, particularly affecting the elderly. There is a lack of evidence-based targeted pharmacological therapy for its prevention and treatment. We aim to compare the effects of a World Health Organization recommendation-based education and a personalised complex preventive lifestyle intervention package (based on the same WHO recommendation) on the outcomes of the COVID-19.

METHODS

PROACTIVE-19 is a pragmatic, randomised controlled clinical trial with adaptive "sample size re-estimation" design. Hungarian population over the age of 60 years without confirmed COVID-19 will be approached to participate in a telephone health assessment and lifestyle counselling voluntarily. Volunteers will be randomised into two groups: (A) general health education and (B) personalised health education. Participants will go through questioning and recommendation in 5 fields: (1) mental health, (2) smoking habits, (3) physical activity, (4) dietary habits, and (5) alcohol consumption. Both groups A and B will receive the same line of questioning to assess habits concerning these topics. Assessment will be done weekly during the first month, every second week in the second month, then monthly. The composite primary endpoint will include the rate of ICU admission, hospital admission (longer than 48 h), and mortality in COVID-19-positive cases. The estimated sample size is 3788 subjects per study arm. The planned duration of the follow-up is a minimum of 1 year.

DISCUSSION

These interventions may boost the body's cardiovascular and pulmonary reserve capacities, leading to improved resistance against the damage caused by COVID-19. Consequently, lifestyle changes can reduce the incidence of life-threatening conditions and attenuate the detrimental effects of the pandemic seriously affecting the older population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study has been approved by the Scientific and Research Ethics Committee of the Hungarian Medical Research Council (IV/2428- 2 /2020/EKU) and has been registered at clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT04321928 ) on 25 March 2020.

[DNVF Memorandum Health Services Research in Oncology]

Health services research in oncology deals with all situations which cancer patients face. It looks at the different phases of care, i. e. prevention / early detection, prehabilitation, diagnostics, therapy, rehabilitation and palliative care as well as the various actors, including those affected, the carers and self-help. It deals with healthy people (e. g. in the context of prevention / early detection), patients and cancer survivors. Due to the nature of cancer and the existing care structures, there are a number of specific contents for health services research in oncology compared to general health services research while the methods remain essentially identical. This memorandum describes the subject, illustrates the care structures and identifies areas of health services research in oncology. This memorandum has been prepared by the Oncology Section of the German Network for Health Services Research and is the result of intensive discussions.

The importance of social relationships for brain tumor patients' quality of life: A case for the inclusion of the concept of disclosure in psycho-oncological care

Purpose: Interpersonal factors are of major importance for cancer patients' physical and mental health. Brain tumor patients rank amongst those cancer patients with the highest psychosocial burden. Changes in language, cognition, and personality pose specific risk factors for impeding interpersonal functioning in this patient group. Despite this, role and relevance of social support including both supportive (e.g., emotional support) and detrimental interactions causing distress (e.g., critical remarks) are not well understood. Aims of this study were thus (1) to investigate the association of social support and patients' Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and (2) to assess whether this relationship is mediated by the patients' disclosure behavior.Methods: Seventy-four ambulatory brain tumor patients (mean age 54 years; 58% women) completed the following self-report questionnaires: Illness-specific Social Support Scale (SSUK) for assessment of positive support and detrimental interactions, the Disclosure of Trauma Questionnaire (DTQ) for assessment of patients' disclosure behavior, and the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-8) for assessment of QoL.Findings: Detrimental social interactions were significantly related to patients' mental and physical well-being while positive support was not. Our results support a model in which patients perceiving detrimental social interactions show more difficulties in talking about illness-specific contents in a functional manner. This, in turn, was associated with a lower physical and mental HRQoL.Conclusions: This was the first study in which the close associations of detrimental social interactions, brain tumor patients' dysfunctional disclosure behavior and patients' mental as well as physical well-being were empiricially validated. Thus, dysfunctional disclosure behavior might pose a relevant therapeutic target when offering psycho-oncological support for brain tumor patients and their families.