Using ultrasound to assess the thickness of the transversus abdominis in a sling exercise

Contraction assessment of abdominal muscles using automated segmentation designed for wearable ultrasound applications

PURPOSE

Wearable ultrasound devices can be used to continuously monitor muscle activity. One possible application is to provide real-time feedback during physiotherapy, to show a patient whether an exercise is performed correctly. Algorithms which automatically analyze the data can be of importance to overcome the need for manual assessment and annotations and speed up evaluations especially when considering real-time video sequences. They even could be used to present feedback in an understandable manner to patients in a home-use scenario. The following work investigates three deep learning based segmentation approaches for abdominal muscles in ultrasound videos during a segmental stabilizing exercise. The segmentations are used to automatically classify the contraction state of the muscles.

METHODS

The first approach employs a simple 2D network, while the remaining two integrate the time information from the videos either via additional tracking or directly into the network architecture. The contraction state is determined by comparing measures such as muscle thickness and center of mass between rest and exercise. A retrospective analysis is conducted but also a real-time scenario is simulated, where classification is performed during exercise.

RESULTS

Using the proposed segmentation algorithms, 71% of the muscle states are classified correctly in the retrospective analysis in comparison to 90% accuracy with manual reference segmentation. For the real-time approach the majority of given feedback during exercise is correct when the retrospective analysis had come to the correct result, too.

CONCLUSION

Both retrospective and real-time analysis prove to be feasible. While no substantial differences between the algorithms were observed regarding classification, the networks incorporating the time information showed temporally more consistent segmentations. Limitations of the approaches as well as reasons for failing cases in segmentation, classification and real-time assessment are discussed and requirements regarding image quality and hardware design are derived.

Effects of Different Sling Settings on Electromyographic Activities of Selected Trunk Muscles: A Preliminary Research

Introduction

The supine and prone sling exercise may facilitate activation of the local trunk muscles. Does the side-lying sling exercise activate trunk muscles more easily than the supine and prone training with sling settings? Clinical work has shown that the side-lying sling exercise could reduce pain in patients with unilateral low back pain (LBP), but the mechanism behind it is unclear. The fundamental purpose of this preliminary study was to examine the electromyography (EMG) characteristics of trunk muscles during different sling lumbar settings on sixteen healthy adults.

Methods

Amplitude and mean power frequency (MPF) of EMG signals were recorded from the transversus abdominis (TA), rectus abdominis (RA), multifidus (MF), erector spinae (ES), gluteus maximus (Gmax), and gluteus medius (Gmed) muscles while the subjects performed the supine lumbar setting (SLS), prone lumbar setting (PLS), left side-lying lumbar setting (LSLS), and right side-lying lumbar setting (RSLS).

Results

During SLS and PLS, TA and MF showed significantly higher activity than RA and ES on the same side, respectively. The EMG activities of ES, TA, MF, Gmax, and Gmed had significant differences between the different sides during LSLS and RSLS, and the dominant-side muscles showed higher activity than the other side. There was no significant difference in core trunk muscles between different sling lumbar settings-only that the SLS of the MF/ES ratio was significantly higher than LSLS and RSLS.

Conclusions

Sling exercises can be an effective measure to enhance MF and TA EMG activity, and the side-lying position can increase dominant-side Gmax and Gmed activity. Side-lying sling training does not activate more core muscles than the supine and prone training. Supine and prone exercise should be preferred over SLT to stabilize the lumbar region because of its high local/global muscle ratio.

TRANSVERSUS ABDOMINIS ACTIVATION AND TIMING IMPROVES FOLLOWING CORE STABILITY TRAINING: A RANDOMIZED TRIAL

Background

Patients with non-specific low back pain (LBP) often present with a decrease in transversus abdominis (TrA) muscle activation and delayed onset of contraction with extremity movements, potentially contributing to recurrent LBP. Core stability is required for extremity movement and if the timing of when the TrA contracts is not corrected patients may continue to experience LBP.

Hypothesis/Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of a four-week core stability rehabilitation program on TrA activation ratio and when the TrA initiates contraction during upper extremity movements in subjects with and without LBP. It was hypothesized that those with LBP would experience greater changes in TrA activation and onset of contraction by the TrA compared to the healthy group.

Study Design

Randomized Clinical Trial.

Methods

Forty-two participants volunteered (21 healthy and 21 LBP). Ultrasound imaging measured the TrA activation ratio and time of initial contraction of the TrA during upper extremity movement into flexion. Half of the healthy and LBP participants were assigned to the exercise group. Participants reported twice a week to the athletic training facility to complete an exercise progression of three exercises. After four weeks, all participants returned to have TrA activation and timing measured again.

Results

Pertaining to demographics, there were no differences between the healthy and LBP participants. There was a group interaction for both TrA activation ratio (p=.049) and onset of initial contraction (p=.008). Those in the exercise group showed an increase in TrA activation ratio (1.85 ± 0.09) compared to the control group (1.79 ± 0.08), as well as an improvement in the onset of contraction (2.07 ± 0.08 seconds) compared to the control group (2.23 ± 0.09 seconds) after the four-week rehabilitation program. Strong effect sizes for TrA activation ratio (0.71 [0.06-1.35]) and initial onset of TrA contraction (-1.88 [-2.63 - -1.11]) were found indicating clinical differences related to the interventions.

Conclusion

TrA activation and timing were altered following a four-week core stability program in people with and without LBP. Clinicians should consider incorporating these exercises for improving the function of the TrA.

Level of Evidence

Therapy, level 2b.

Effects of lumbopelvic sling and abdominal drawing-in exercises on lung capacity in healthy adults

[Purpose] To examine the effects of lumbopelvic sling and abdominal drawing-in exercises on the lung capacities of healthy subjects. [Subjects and Methods] Twenty-nine healthy subjects with no orthopedic history of the back were recruited. Subjects were randomly assigned to a experimental group and control group. Subjects were allocated to one of two groups; an experimental group that underwent lumbopelvic sling and abdominal drawing-in exercises and a control group that underwent treadmill and abdominal drawing-in exercises. Lung capacities were evaluated 4 weeks after exercises. [Results] The experimental group showed significant increments in EV, ERV, IRV, VT vs. pre-intervention results, and the control group showed significant increments in the EVC and IRV. Significant intergroup differences were observed in terms of post-training gains in EVC, IRV, and VT. [Conclusion] Combined application of lumbopelvic sling and abdominal drawing-in exercises were found to have a positive effect on lung capacity.