A qualitative interview study applying the COM-B model to explore how hospital-based trainers implement antimicrobial stewardship education and training in UK hospital-based care

Time is running out. No excuses to delay implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programmes: impact, sustainability, resilience and efficiency through an interrupted time series analysis (2017-2022)

Introduction

The WHO declared antimicrobial resistance (AMR) a significant concern in 2014, sparking initiatives to ensure responsible antibiotic use. In human medicine, Antimicrobial Stewardship Programmes (ASPs) in hospitals play a pivotal role in combating AMR. Although evidence supports the effectiveness of ASPs in optimizing antimicrobial use, often the lack of resources becomes an excuse to limit their dissemination and use. This paper provides a comprehensive report on a 6-year analysis of an ASP implemented in a healthcare region in north-east Italy.

Methods

A retrospective data collection was conducted to assess the programme's impact on antibiotic consumption expressed as DDDs/100 patient-days, its sustainability over time, resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic and the efficiency of the ASP (relationship between workload and human resources).

Results

A substantial overall reduction in antibiotic consumption (-14%), particularly in fluoroquinolones (-64%) and carbapenems (-68%), was demonstrated, showcasing the programme's impact. Sustainability was confirmed through enduring trends in antibiotic consumption and ecological analysis over time. The ASP demonstrates resilience by maintaining positive trends even amid the challenging COVID-19 pandemic. Efficiency was underscored by an increase in on-site consultations despite consistent human resources until 2021.

Conclusions

This study offers insights into the prolonged success of a resource-efficient ASP, emphasizing the crucial role of long-term commitment in fostering responsible antibiotic use in the context of global health challenges such as AMR.

Improving healthcare professionals' interactions with patients to tackle antimicrobial resistance: a systematic review of interventions, barriers, and facilitators

Introduction

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major public health threat. With the growing emphasis on patient-centred care/ shared decision making, it is important for healthcare professionals' (HCPs) who prescribe, dispense, administer and/or monitor antimicrobials to be adequately equipped to facilitate appropriate antimicrobial use. We systematically identified existing interventions which aim to improve HCPs interaction with patients and examined barriers and facilitators of appropriate the use of such interventions and appropriate antimicrobial use among both HCPs and patientsantimicrobial use while using these interventions.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and internet (via Google search engine). We included primary studies, published in English from 2010 to 2023 [PROSPERO (CRD42023395642)]. The protocol was preregistered with PROSPERO (CRD42023395642). We performed quality assessment using mixed methods appraisal tool. We applied narrative synthesis and used the COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation -Behaviour) as a theoretical framework for barriers and facilitators at HCP and patient levels.

Results

Of 9,172 citations retrieved from database searches, From 4,979 citations remained after removal of duplicates. We included 59 studies spanning over 13 countries. Interventions often involved multiple components beyond HCPs' interaction with patients. From 24 studies reporting barriers and facilitators, we identified issues relating to capability (such as, knowledge/understanding about AMR, diagnostic uncertainties, awareness of interventions and forgetfulness); opportunity (such as, time constraint and intervention accessibility) and motivation (such as, patient's desire for antibiotics and fear of litigation).

Conclusion

The findings of this review should be considered by intervention designers/adopters and policy makers to improve utilisation and effectiveness.

Nurses' engagement in antimicrobial stewardship and its influencing factors: A cross-sectional study

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the level and influencing factors of nurses' antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) engagement in China based on the capability, opportunity, motivation, and behavior (COM-B) theory, providing valuable insights for developing effective strategies to improve nursing quality in AMS.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted in 17 tertiary hospitals in Hunan, China, from November 2021 to January 2022. A total of 4,514 nurses were selected. The Nurse AMS Engagement Questionnaire (NAEQ), developed using the COM-B theory, was used for evaluation. The questionnaire included capability (14 items), opportunity (7 items), motivation (6 items), and behavior (12 items) four dimensions, 39 items.

Results

The total NAEQ score was 155.08 ± 27.12, indicating a moderate level. The score of the capability, opportunity, motivation, and behavior dimensions were 52.33 ± 13.48, 28.64 ± 5.76, 24.57 ± 4.57 and 49.53 ± 8.83, respectively. Significant differences in nurses' AMS engagement were based on professional titles, whether working as a part-time infection control nurse, whether knowing the AMS teams and the defined daily doses of antibiotics, department type, the deployment of clinical pharmacists, and frequency of antimicrobial training and physician-nurse joint rounds (P < 0.05). Nurses with junior titles had higher scores on the NAEQ than nurses with intermediate titles (P < 0.05). Nurses who worked as part-time infection control nurses, knew the AMS team, and the defined daily doses of antibiotics had higher NAEQ scores than those who didn't (P < 0.01). Nurses working in the ICU and infectious disease department had lower NAEQ scores than those in other departments, such as the ear, nose, and throat (ENT) department (P < 0.01). Nurses who had clinical pharmacists deployed in their department had higher NAEQ scores than those without or unclear deployment (P < 0.01). Furthermore, nurses who received more frequent antimicrobial training and participated in physician-nurse joint rounds had higher NAEQ scores (P < 0.01).

Conclusion

Multiple strategies, including enhanced education and training and improved multidisciplinary communication and collaboration, are expected to improve nurse AMS engagement. It is important to give more attention to nurses with intermediate professional titles, less experience, and those working in specific departments.