Apatinib in patients with recurrent or metastatic thymic epithelial tumor: a single-arm, multicenter, open-label, phase II trial

Thymic epithelial tumor medical treatment: A narrative review

Thymic epithelial tumors, a malignancy originating in the thymus, are the commonest primary neoplasm of the anterior mediastinum; however, among thoracic tumors, they have a relatively low incidence rare. Thymic epithelial tumors can be broadly classified into thymic carcinoma and thymoma. As the cornerstone of thymic tumor treatment, surgery is the preferred treatment for early-stage patients, whereas, for advanced unresectable thymic tumors, the treatment is chemoradiotherapy. Targeted therapy is less effective for thymic tumors. Moreover, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors as another effective treatment option for advanced unresectable thymic tumors, particularly thymomas, is limited owing to immune-related adverse effects. Here, we have summarized all pertinent information regarding chemotherapy, especially preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and chemotherapy in combination with other treatments, and reviewed the effectiveness of these procedures and recent advances in targeted therapy. In addition, we analyzed the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in thymic epithelial tumors, to provide a holistic treatment view.

Evolving treatment landscape in thymic epithelial tumors: From mechanism to therapy

Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are rare neoplasms of the anterior mediastinum that arise from thymic epithelial cells. Although surgery is the preferred treatment for resectable TETs, the options for unresectable or recurrent advanced-stage TETs are limited beyond platinum-based chemotherapy. The evolving landscape of TET treatments is marked by significant advancements in targeted therapies and immunotherapies, particularly with anti-angiogenic agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). While monotherapies demonstrated certain efficacy, the development of combination strategies is vital for improving patient outcomes. This review consolidates progress in anti-angiogenic therapies and ICIs, emphasizing the evolution of combination therapies of TETs. Furtherly, we particularly discuss new first-line strategies based on these advancements and emphasizes exploring novel treatments like antibody-drug conjugates, immunomodulatory drugs and cytokine-based agents for TETs. Mechanistically, the molecular features of TETs integrated with clinical diagnosis and targeted therapy, and immunophenotyping of TETs along with its impact on the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy are discussed. Thus, this review systemizes the development in the treatment landscape of TETs, integrating the corresponding molecular and immune mechanisms, aiming to provide new references for the treatment of TETs.

The influence of PD-L1 expression levels on the efficacy of combination therapy in thymic epithelial tumors

BACKGROUND

The significant expression of PD-L1 in thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) has been confirmed, and immunotherapy and its combination therapy have been effective in TETs. However, there is no present evidence that the expression levels of PD-L1 affects the efficacy of combination therapy. Our study aimed to shed light on this relationship.

METHODS

Patients with thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) from multicenter hospitals were retrospectively identified. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in 22 patients were included. We divided the patients the 22 patients with PD-L1 test into three levels (high expression, low expression and no expression) and analyzed the relationship between the levels of PD-L1 expression and the efficacy of combination therapy.

RESULTS

Combination therapy showed an effective benefit in 22 patients with TETs, the median PFS (mPFS) was 16 months (95% CI: 8.5-23.5) and the median OS (mOS) was 38 months (95% CI: 21.5-54.5). Cox-regressive analysis found whether PD-L1 expression affected the PFS of patients (p = 0.017). Among the patients with PD-L1 expression, the levels of expression were correlated with curative effect (Kruskal-Wallis test, PFS: P = 0.012; OS: P = 0.01), and high expression group was along with better efficacy than low expression (Wilcoxon test, P = 0.01). Moreover, in 17 patients treated with immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy, the expression of PD-L1 was also associated with efficacy (Kruskal-Wallis test, p = 0.021).

CONCLUSIONS

PD-L1 expression affects the PFS of patients. High expression of PD-L1 patients with TETs responded better to combination therapy, which could provide a therapeutic option in clinic. Besides, other targeted treatments should be considered.

Poor efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment in advanced thymic carcinoma patients with liver metastases

Background

Although immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment for advanced thymic carcinoma exhibits promising efficacy, factors that affect the efficacy and prognosis, including metastases sites, remain uncertain.

Objectives

Our study aimed to investigate the determinants of survival among patients with advanced thymic carcinoma who underwent immunotherapy in real-world settings, with implications for clinical practice.

Designs

Different therapy regimens of immunotherapy were produced to analyze the influence of liver metastases on survival and prognosis for advanced thymic carcinoma patients.

Methods

Data for advanced thymic carcinoma patients receiving immunotherapy and their metastases sites were collected for analysis from seven different hospitals between January 2015 and January 2023. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox analysis was used to evaluate factors influencing survival.

Results

The present study analyzed 136 advanced thymic carcinoma patients from seven different hospitals.The PFS for all patients receiving immunotherapy was 6.4 months, while the OS was 24.0 months. The objective response rate was different for patients with liver and non-liver metastases (11.9% versus 37.2%, p = 0.003). The disease control rate values were also different between the two groups (47.6% versus 80.9%, p = 0.037). The PFS for patients with liver metastases demonstrated poor immunotherapy efficacy compared to patients with non-liver metastases (3.0 versus 8.0 months, p < 0.0001). The OS was also significantly different between these two patient groups (16.1 versus 29.1 months, p = 0.009).

Conclusion

Immunotherapy had poor efficacy in advanced thymic carcinoma patients with liver metastases.

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Different Second-line Therapies for Patients With Advanced Thymic Carcinoma

AIMS

Thymic carcinoma (TC) is a rare form of highly invasive tumors. Currently, the standard first-line therapy involves paclitaxel plus carboplatin treatment, while the recommended regimen for second-line therapy remains uncertain. The purpose of this study is to explore the second-line mode of TC patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated the outcome of subjects with advanced TC between 2009 and 2023 in three medical centers, retrospectively. Tumor response was evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1). Kaplan-Meier was used for calculating Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The factors affecting survival in the real world were evaluated by Cox analysis.

RESULTS

Totally 136 patients were included in this study, the median PFS (mPFS) for all subjects was 5.97 months, and the median OS (mOS) was 25.03 months. According to patient's treatment modes, they are divided into monotherapy (n = 95) and combination therapy (n = 41), PFS manifested the difference between two groups (5.17 vs. 9.00 months, P = 0.043). OS also indicated a significant distinction (22.50 vs. 38.00 months, P = 0.017). Furthermore, there was a significant difference in PFS between patients using immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy and those with antivascular therapy (8.57 vs. 13.10 months, P = 0.047).

CONCLUSION

In the second-line therapy for advanced TC, the efficacy of combination therapy was better than monotherapy, especially for immunotherapy combined with antivascular therapy.

A Re-Examination of Neoadjuvant Therapy for Thymic Tumors: A Long and Winding Road

For most patients with advanced thymic epithelial tumors (TETs), a complete resection is a strong indicator of a better prognosis. But sometimes, primary surgery is unsatisfactory, and preoperative therapy is needed to facilitate complete resection. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the most used form of preoperative therapy. But studies on neoadjuvant chemotherapy have included mainly patients with thymoma; its efficacy in patients with thymic carcinoma is less known. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation has also been explored in a few studies. Novel therapies such as immunotherapy and targeted therapy have shown efficacy in patients with recurrent/metastatic TETs as a second-line option; their role as preoperative therapy is still under investigation. In this review, we discuss the existing evidence on preoperative therapy and the insight it provides for current clinical practice and future studies.

Small molecule multitarget antiangiogenic inhibitor treatments for advanced thymic epithelial tumors: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are rare malignant tumors with limited treatment options. No established second-line treatment regimen is available following the preferred first-line chemotherapy, resulting in unsatisfactory efficacy and poor prognosis for patients with advanced TETs. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of small molecule multitarget antiangiogenic inhibitors as well as the prognostic factors for advanced TETs.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted using data from a real-world database. Clinical information and survival follow-up data were collected from 52 patients with advanced TETs who received small molecule multitarget antiangiogenic inhibitors at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between August 10, 2016 and August 10, 2022. The short-term efficacy of the treatments, survival time of the patients, and relevant prognostic factors of advanced TETs were analyzed.

RESULTS

Out of the 52 patients included in this study, 16 had thymoma and 36 had thymic carcinoma. The 52 patients had an overall response rate of 21.1% and a disease control rate of 94.2%. In addition, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.05 months, and the overall survival (OS) was 25.00 months. Apatinib was given to 33 patients, anlotinib to 15 patients, and sunitinib or lenvatinib to four patients. Only seven patients received antiangiogenic inhibitors as their first-line therapy, 27 patients as their second-line therapy, and 18 patients as third-line or subsequent therapy. Meanwhile, 42 patients received monotherapy with an antiangiogenesis inhibitor, while 10 patients received combination therapy. Univariate analysis indicated that the combined treatment was associated with a superior OS (p = 0.044); multivariate analysis indicated that the combined treatment was an independent prognostic factor for PFS (p = 0.014) and OS (p = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that small molecule multitarget antiangiogenic inhibitors are efficacious as second or post-line treatments as a viable alternative treatment option for patients with advanced TETs.

An Overview of the Use of Anti-Angiogenic Agents in the Treatment of Thymic Epithelial Tumors

Angiogenesis significantly influences the carcinogenesis of thymic epithelial tumors (TET). Both thymomas and thymic carcinoma (TC) overexpress VEGF-A and VEGFR-1 and -2. This review aims to provide an appraisal of the use of anti-angiogenics in the treatment of TET. The literature research identified 16 studies that were deemed eligible for further analysis. Seven studies assessed the clinical efficacy of sunitinib and five studies the use of apatinib and/or anlotinib. The multicenter Japanese phase II REMORA trial investigated the efficacy of lenvatinib, which is a multi-targeted inhibitor of VEGFR, FGFR, RET, c-Kit, and other kinases. The objective response rate was 38% (25.6-52%), which is the highest documented in TET that progressed after first-line chemotherapy. Anti-angiogenic agents may be useful in the treatment of TET, which are not amenable to curative treatment. Their toxicity profile seems to be acceptable. However, angiogenesis inhibitors do not appear to have a major influence on either thymomas or TC, although multikinase inhibitors may have some effect on TC. The current evidence suggests that the most active agent is lenvatinib, whereas sunitinib could be proposed as an acceptable second-line therapy for TC. Further research concerning the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors with anti-angiogenic drugs is warranted.

Low-dose apatinib in subjects with renal impairment: A pharmacokinetics study

OBJECTIVE

In patients with renal impairment, we studied apatinib and its major metabolites (M1-1, M1-2, M1-6, and M9-2) for pharmacokinetics.

METHODS

Subjects with different renal functions were given a single oral dose of apatinib mesylate tablets of 250 mg. Pharmacokinetic samples were collected at 1 hour before dosing,0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h after dosing. The pharmacokinetic parameters of apatinib and its major metabolites were calculated by noncompartmental analysis.

RESULTS

Comparing PK parameters of the mild or moderate renal impairment group with the healthy group: the geometric mean ratios of maximum observed drug concentration (Cmax), the area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve from time 0 to the final quantifiable time (AUC0-t), and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-inf) were all about one. No significant effect of mild and moderate renal impairment on apatinib pharmacokinetics was observed. Mild and moderate renal impairment was also not observed to have a significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of metabolites M1-1, M1-2, and M1-6. However, mild and moderate renal impairment had a certain increase in exposure to the metabolite M9-2. Considering that M9-2 has no inhibitory effect on protein tyrosine kinase, it has no clinical significance. In addition, the proportion of cumulative excretion of apatinib and its major metabolites was small and almost negligible in all three groups of subjects.

CONCLUSION

Patients with mild and moderate renal impairment do not need to adjust the dose of apatinib when using low dose (250 mg) apatinib.

Current Treatment Approaches for Thymic Epithelial Tumors

Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs), including thymoma, thymic carcinoma and neuroendocrine tumors, are uncommon tumors that originate from the epithelial cells of the thymus. Nevertheless, despite their rarity, they represent the most common tumor type located in the anterior mediastinum. Therapeutic choices based on staging and histology may include surgery with or without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy represented by chemotherapy, radiotherapy or chemo-radiotherapy. For patients with advanced or metastatic TETs, platinum-based chemotherapy remains the standard first-line treatment; however, some new drugs and combinations are currently under evaluation. In any case, proper management of patients with TETs requires a multidisciplinary team approach to personalize care for each patient.

Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of thymic epithelial tumors

Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are a relatively rare type of thoracic tumor, accounting for less than 1% of all tumors. The incidence of TETs is about 3.93/10000 in China, slightly higher than that of European and American countries. For resectable TETs, complete surgical resection is recommended. Radiotherapy or chemotherapy may be used as postoperative adjuvant treatment. Treatment for advanced, unresectable TETs consist mainly of radiotherapy and chemotherapy, but there is a lack of standard first- and second-line treatment regimens. Recently, targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown promising outcomes in TETs. Based on the currently available clinical evidences and the opinions of the national experts, the Thymic Oncology Group of Yangtze River Delta Lung Cancer Cooperation Group (East China LUng caNcer Group, ECLUNG; Youth Committee) established this Chinese expert consensus on the clinical diagnosis and treatment of TETs, covering the epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, prognosis and follow-up of TETs.

The efficacy of small molecule anti-angiogenic drugs in previously treated Thymic carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Antiangiogenic drugs have shown initial efficacy in the treatment of advanced thymic carcinomas (TCs); however, data are limited. In this study, we provide real-world data relating to the efficacy of antiangiogenic drugs for the treatment of patients with TCs.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data on clinical progress after first-line chemotherapy in TCs patients who were treated with small molecule antiangiogenic drugs at our institution between January 2010 and December 2021. Tumor response was evaluated according to version 1.1 of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Progression free survival and overall survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Of the 17 patients enrolled, 13 (76.5%) received apatinib and four (23.5%) anlotinib monotherapy with an objective response rate of 23.5%. Eleven (64.7%) patients had stable disease. The median follow-up period was 46.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 33.0-59.0 months). The median progression survival and overall survival were 7.9 months (95% CI, 6.5-9.3) and 47.0 months (95% CI, 35.4-58.6), respectively. In the 13 patients receiving apatinib, the median PFS was 7.0 months (95% CI, 5.0-9.0), compared with 8.0 months (95% CI, 2.7-13.3 months) for patients in the anlotinib group (P = 0.945). The most common grade 3 adverse events (AEs) were hypertension (n = 3, 23.1%), followed by proteinuria and hand-foot syndrome (HFS, n = 2, 15.4%). There were no grade 4 AEs although eight patients (47.1%) required mid-course discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

For refractory TCs, small molecule antiangiogenic drugs are efficacious as second- or post-line treatments. The toxicity of antiangiogenic therapy is manageable.