1
|
Vucicevic RS, Zavras AG, Fice MP, Gusho C, Yu A, Gitelis S, Blank AT, Myers JA, Colman MW. Does adding sacroiliac (type IV) resection to periacetabular (type II) resection increase complications or provide worse clinical outcomes? An institutional experience and systematic review. Surg Oncol 2024; 56:102116. [PMID: 39128439 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2024] [Revised: 07/09/2024] [Accepted: 07/30/2024] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Internal hemipelvectomy is a limb sparing procedure most commonly indicated for malignant bone and soft tissue tumors of the pelvis. Partial resection and pelvic reconstruction may be challenging for orthopedic oncologists due to late presentation, high tumor burden, and complex anatomy. Specifically, wide resection of tumors involving the periacetabular and sacroiliac (SI) regions may compromise adjacent vital neurovascular structures, impair wound healing, or limit functional recovery. We aimed to present a series of patients treated at our institution who underwent periacetabular internal hemipelvectomy (Type II) with or without sacral extension (Type IV) in combination with a systematic review to investigate postoperative complications, functional outcomes, and implant and patient survival following pelvic tumor resection via Type II hemipelvectomy with or without Type IV resection. MATERIALS AND METHODS A surgical registry of consecutive patients treated with internal hemipelvectomy for primary or secondary pelvic bone tumors at our institution since 1994 was retrospectively reviewed. All type II resection patients were stratified into two separate cohorts, based on whether or not periacetabular resection was extended beyond the SI joint to include the sacrum (Type IV), as per the Enneking and Dunham classification. Patient demographics, operative parameters, complications, and oncological outcomes were collected. Categorical and continuous variables were compared with Pearson's chi square or Fisher's exact test and the Mann-Whitney U test, respectively. Literature review according to PRISMA guidelines queried studies pertaining to patient outcomes following periacetabular internal hemipelvectomy. The search strategy included combinations of the key words "internal hemipelvectomy", "pelvic reconstruction", "pelvic tumor", and "limb salvage". Pooled data was compared using Pearson's chi square. Statistical significance was established as p < 0.05. RESULTS A total of 76 patients were treated at our institution with internal hemipelvectomy for pelvic tumor resection, of whom 21 had periacetabular resection. Fifteen patients underwent Type II resection without Type IV involvement, whereas six patients had combined Type II/IV resection. There were no significant differences between groups in operative time, blood loss, complications, local recurrence, postoperative metastasis, or disease mortality. Systematic review yielded 69 studies comprising 929 patients who underwent internal hemipelvectomy with acetabular resection. Of these, 906 (97.5 %) had only Type II resection while 23 (2.5 %) had concomitant Type II/IV resection. While overall complication rates were comparable, Type II resection alone produced significantly fewer neurological complications when compared to Type II resection with sacral extension (3.9 % vs. 17.4 %, p = 0.001). No significant differences were found between rates of wound complications, infections, or construct failures. Local recurrence, postoperative metastasis, and survival outcomes were similar. Type II internal hemipelvectomy without Type IV resection on average produced higher postoperative MSTS functional scores than with Type IV resection. CONCLUSION In our series, the two groups exhibited no differences. From the systematic review, operative parameters, local recurrence or systemic metastasis, implant survival, and disease mortality were comparable in patients undergoing Type II internal hemipelvectomy alone compared to patients undergoing some combination of Type II/IV resection. However, compound resections increased the risk of neurological complications and experienced poorer MSTS functional scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajko S Vucicevic
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Athan G Zavras
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michael P Fice
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Charles Gusho
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Austin Yu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Steven Gitelis
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Alan T Blank
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jonathan A Myers
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Matthew W Colman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gui S, Xu W, Ouyang Z, Guo X, Shen Y, Tao H, Chen X, Peng D. Endoprosthetic replacement with preservation of the epiphysis for proximal tibial reconstruction after osteosarcoma resection in children: a case report. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2024; 25:567. [PMID: 39033278 PMCID: PMC11264714 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07651-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/01/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Limb salvage surgery is an important method for treating malignant tumors of the bone involving the adjacent parts of the major joints in children. This technique allows for preservation of limb function, especially in the lower limb. However, the reconstruction of the proximal end of the tibia after removing the tumor mass with a rational scale to preserve the total knee joint and reduce limb length discrepancy presents a challenge. CASE PRESENTATION We present a case of osteosarcoma of the proximal tibia. After being treated with an extended tumor resection, the proximal tibia of the child was restructured using endoprosthetic replacement with epiphyseal preservation. This procedure preserves the entire articular surface and growth plate of the knee joint of the affected limb and provides a feasible alternative protocol for retaining the function and growth potential of the affected limb. The patient remained disease-free and normal limb motor function was observed during the 3.5 year follow-up since the initial surgery. CONCLUSIONS Preservation of the epiphysis enabled our patient to perform better limb function after limb-saving surgery as a result of his undamaged knee joint and minimized limb-length discrepancy. We believe that endoprosthetic replacement with preservation of the epiphysis can provide the best strategy for reconstruction after resection of focal malignant tumors in long bones without epiphytic involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sijie Gui
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China
| | - Wangtong Xu
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China
| | - Zhengxiao Ouyang
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China
| | - Xiaoning Guo
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China
| | - Yi Shen
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China
| | - Huai Tao
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, 410208, China
| | - Xia Chen
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China.
| | - Dan Peng
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Asavamongkolkul A, Chotikawanich E. Late Distal Ureteral Stricture in Internal Hemipelvectomy Without Bone Reconstruction: A Case Report. Res Rep Urol 2022; 14:275-280. [PMID: 35923889 PMCID: PMC9343173 DOI: 10.2147/rru.s370265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
We report the case of a patient with Ewing sarcoma involving the right pelvis in a 14-year-old girl who had multicycles of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and preoperative radiation therapy. She underwent an internal hemipelvectomy type I resection, according to Enneking and Dunham’s classification without bony reconstruction. There was no intra- and perioperative complication. The patient has good function and needs no gait aids. She can walk with equinus foot compensated for leg shortening 5 centimeters and without a shoe-lift. There is no sign of disease relapse. However, she developed late ureteral stricture at 8-year postoperatively and was successfully treated with a ureteral stent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Apichat Asavamongkolkul
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Correspondence: Apichat Asavamongkolkul, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand, Tel/Fax +66 2-419-7968, Email
| | - Ekkarin Chotikawanich
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Housset V, Anract P, Babinet A, Auberger G, Biau D. Proximal femur versus acetabular extra-articular resection of the hip joint for primary malignant bone tumors: a retrospective comparative review of 33 cases. World J Surg Oncol 2022; 20:168. [PMID: 35643461 PMCID: PMC9145149 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-022-02642-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Extra-articular resection (EAR) of the hip joint is prone to significant complications and morbidity. Thus, this study evaluates the cumulative incidences and main reasons of reoperation following EAR of primary malignant bone tumors (PMBT) of the hip to determine whether the outcomes are different between EAR of the pelvis and that of the proximal femur. Patients and methods Thirty-three patients presented with a PMBT of the proximal femur or pelvis were included in this study. Among all PMBTs, 58% originated from the pelvis and 42% were from the proximal femur. Twenty patients had chondrosarcomas (61%), 10 had osteosarcomas (30%), and 3 had sarcomas of another histological subtype (9%). Results The mean follow-up was of 76 months (range: 24–220 months). The cumulative probabilities of revision for any reason were 52% (95% confidence interval [CI] 30–70%) 5 years after surgery. The 5-year cumulative probabilities of revision were 13% (95% CI 4–27%), 24% (95% CI 10–42%), and 34% (95% CI 14–56%) for mechanical, infectious, and tumoral reasons, respectively. The 5-year cumulative probabilities of revision for any reason were 78% (95% CI 37–94%) and 14% (95% CI 2–38%) for the pelvis and proximal femur, respectively (p = 0.004). Posterior column preservation was significantly associated with more mechanical complications even after adjusting for the resection site (p = 0.043). Conclusion Half of patients undergoing EAR of the hip joint for PMBT of the proximal femur or acetabulum will require another operation. EAR of the pelvis is associated with significantly worse outcome than EAR of the proximal femur.
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhang X, Tang X, Li Z, Zhang X, Li F, Tao C, Liu T. Clinical and radiological outcomes of combined modular prothesis and cortical strut for revision proximal femur in giant cell tumor of bone patients. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2022; 30:10225536221095202. [PMID: 35491561 DOI: 10.1177/10225536221095202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Femoral bone deficiency is a challenging problem in revision proximal femoral replacement. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of revision proximal femoral replacement as a salvage treatment for severe bone loss after oncologic proximal replacement surgery in patient with benign giant cell tumor of bone. METHODS 16 patients (6 men and 10 women) were included in this retrospective study, with a mean age of 46.6 year at the time of revision surgery. All patients underwent revision proximal femoral replacement with the use of modular prosthesis and cortical strut allografts. The modified Harris Hip Score, Short Form 36, and musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score were used for patient evaluation. Regular follow-up was performed to evaluate the recurrence and metastases rate, limb function, and long-term complications of patients. RESULTS The average follow-up was 46.3 months (range, 26-75 months), during which there was no local recurrence and metastases of patient. At the latest follow-up, the mean modified Harris Hip Score was 70.6 points, which was significantly improved compared with that of preoperative (p < 0.05). The final follow-up results of Short Form 36, Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score, and limb-length discrepancy were also significantly improved compared to that of preoperative (p < 0.05). At the latest follow-up, the implanted femoral stems were all stable and all cortical strut allografts were also incorporated to their own bone. CONCLUSION Using modular prosthesis and cortical strut allografts in revision, proximal femur replacement is an acceptable procedure for relatively young patient with severe proximal femoral bone loss after oncologic surgery with benign giant cell tumor of bone. More attentions should be paid to reduce the risk of complications in these complex reconstructions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xianghong Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.,Department of Orthopedics, Liuzhou General Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Liuzhou, China
| | - Xianzhe Tang
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.,Department of Orthopedics, Chenzhou No. 1 People's Hospital, Chenzhou, China
| | - Zhihong Li
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xiangsheng Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Fuming Li
- Department of Orthopedics, Liuzhou General Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Liuzhou, China
| | - Cheng Tao
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Tang Liu
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fujiwara T, Ogura K, Christ A, Bartelstein M, Kenan S, Fabbri N, Healey J. Periacetabular reconstruction following limb-salvage surgery for pelvic sarcomas. J Bone Oncol 2021; 31:100396. [PMID: 34786331 PMCID: PMC8577502 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbo.2021.100396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Revised: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 10/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Limb-salvage surgery for pelvic sarcomas remains one of the most challenging surgical procedures for musculoskeletal oncologists. In the past several decades, various surgical techniques have been developed for periacetabular reconstruction following pelvic tumor resection. These methods include endoprosthetic reconstruction, allograft or autograft reconstruction, arthrodesis, and hip transposition. Each of these procedures has its own advantages and disadvantages, and there is no consensus or gold standard for periacetabular reconstruction. Consequently, this review provides an overview of the clinical outcomes for each of these reconstructive options following pelvic tumor resections. Overall, high complication rates are associated with the use of massive implants/grafts, and deep infection is generally the most common cause of reconstruction failure. Functional outcomes decline with the occurrence of severe complications. Further efforts to avoid complications using innovative techniques, such as antibiotic-laden devices, computer navigation, custom cutting jigs, and reduced use of implants/grafts, are crucial to improve outcomes, especially in patients at a high risk of complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomohiro Fujiwara
- Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Koichi Ogura
- Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexander Christ
- Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Meredith Bartelstein
- Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shachar Kenan
- Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nicola Fabbri
- Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - John Healey
- Department of Surgery, Orthopaedic Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Migliorini F, La Padula G, Torsiello E, Spiezia F, Oliva F, Maffulli N. Strategies for large bone defect reconstruction after trauma, infections or tumour excision: a comprehensive review of the literature. Eur J Med Res 2021; 26:118. [PMID: 34600573 PMCID: PMC8487570 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-021-00593-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Large bone defects resulting from musculoskeletal tumours, infections, or trauma are often unable to heal spontaneously. The challenge for surgeons is to avoid amputation, and provide the best functional outcomes. Allograft, vascularized fibular or iliac graft, hybrid graft, extracorporeal devitalized autograft, distraction osteogenesis, induced-membrane technique, and segmental prostheses are the most common surgical strategies to manage large bone defects. Given its optimal osteogenesis, osteoinduction, osteoconduction, and histocompatibility properties, along with the lower the risk of immunological rejection, autologous graft represents the most common used strategy for reconstruction of bone defects. However, the choice of the best surgical technique is still debated, and no consensus has been reached. The present study investigated the current reconstructive strategies for large bone defect after trauma, infections, or tumour excision, discussed advantages and disadvantages of each technique, debated available techniques and materials, and evaluated complications and new perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Orthopaedic, Trauma, and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH University Hospital, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
| | - Gerardo La Padula
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Via S. Allende, 84081, Baronissi, SA, Italy
| | - Ernesto Torsiello
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Via S. Allende, 84081, Baronissi, SA, Italy
| | - Filippo Spiezia
- Ospedale San Carlo Potenza, Via Potito Petrone, 85100, Potenza, Italy
| | - Francesco Oliva
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Via S. Allende, 84081, Baronissi, SA, Italy
| | - Nicola Maffulli
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Via S. Allende, 84081, Baronissi, SA, Italy.,School of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Keele University Faculty of Medicine, Thornburrow Drive, Stoke on Trent, England.,Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Mile End Hospital, Queen Mary University of London, 275 Bancroft Road, London, E1 4DG, England
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Xu M, Xu M, Zhang S, Li H, Qiuchi AI, Yu X, Wang XQ. Comparative efficacy of intraoperative extracorporeal irradiated and alcohol-inactivated autograft reimplantation for the management of osteosarcomas-a multicentre retrospective study. World J Surg Oncol 2021; 19:157. [PMID: 34039361 PMCID: PMC8157677 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-021-02271-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biologic bone reconstruction in limb salvage surgery for the treatment of malignant bone tumours has always been controversial. The various inactivation methods, their convenience and stability, the curative effects elicited and associated costs all need to be considered. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of intraoperative extracorporeal irradiated reimplantation with alcohol-inactivated autograft reimplantation for limb salvage surgery in patients with osteosarcoma. METHODS We retrospectively analysed 28 patients with osteosarcoma, 14 patients treated with intraoperative cobalt 60 irradiation and reimplantation (group A), and 14 patients treated by alcohol-inactivated autograft reimplantation (group B). The postoperative complications and clinical efficacy of each treatment method were compared by statistical analysis. RESULTS The local recurrence rate was 14.3% in each group. Complete bony union was achieved in 64.3% of patients in group A and 71.4% of patients in group B. The overall 5-year survival rate was 71.4% in group A and 78.6% in group B. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score was 25.33 ± 4.72 (range 15-30) in group A and 24.00 ± 5.85 (range 15-30) in group B, and the mean International Society of Limb Salvage (ISOLS) score was 25.79 ± 5.13 (range 20-36) in group A and 26.14 ± 5.33 (range 20-30) in group B. P < 0.05 was considered to indicate a significant difference. The results showed that the long-term clinical efficacy did not differ significantly between the two methods. CONCLUSIONS In limb salvage surgery for osteosarcoma, intraoperative extracorporeal irradiation and alcohol-inactivated autograft reimplantation yielded equivalent outcomes. The alcohol-inactivated method may be a much more convenient and inexpensive way to reconstruct bone defects. Additional studies as well as more case studies are needed to fully evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of this treatment method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meitao Xu
- Department of Orthopaedics, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Ming Xu
- Department of Orthopaedics, The 960th Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army Joint Logistic Support Force, Jinan, China
| | - Shuai Zhang
- Department of Orthopaedics, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Hanqing Li
- Department of Orthopaedics, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - A I Qiuchi
- Department of Orthopaedics, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Xiuchun Yu
- Department of Orthopaedics, The 960th Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army Joint Logistic Support Force, Jinan, China.
| | - Xu Quan Wang
- Department of Orthopaedics, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China. .,Department of Orthopaedics, Gui Qian International General Hospital, Guiyang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fujiwara T, Medellin Rincon MR, Sambri A, Tsuda Y, Clark R, Stevenson J, Parry MC, Grimer RJ, Jeys L. Limb-salvage reconstruction following resection of pelvic bone sarcomas involving the acetabulum. Bone Joint J 2021; 103-B:795-803. [PMID: 33789467 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.103b4.bjj-2020-0665.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Limb salvage for pelvic sarcomas involving the acetabulum is a major surgical challenge. There remains no consensus about what is the optimum type of reconstruction after resection of the tumour. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes in these patients according to the methods of periacetabular reconstruction. METHODS The study involved a consecutive series of 122 patients with a periacetabular bone sarcoma who underwent limb-salvage surgery involving a custom-made prosthesis in 65 (53%), an ice-cream cone prosthesis in 21 (17%), an extracorporeal irradiated autograft in 18 (15%), and nonskeletal reconstruction in 18 (15%). RESULTS The rates of major complications necessitating further surgery were 62%, 24%, 56%, and 17% for custom-made prostheses, ice-cream cone prostheses, irradiated autografts and nonskeletal reconstructions, respectively (p = 0.001). The ten-year cumulative incidence of failure of the reconstruction was 19%, 9%, 33%, and 0%, respectively. The major cause of failure was deep infection (11%), followed by local recurrence (6%). The mean functional Musculoskeletal Tumour Society (MSTS) scores were 59%, 74%, 64%, and 72%, respectively. The scores were significantly lower in patients with major complications than in those without complications (mean 52% (SD 20%) vs 74% (SD 19%); p < 0.001). For periacetabular resections involving the ilium, the mean score was the highest with custom-made prostheses (82% (SD 10%)) in patients without any major complication; however, nonskeletal reconstruction resulted in the highest mean scores (78% (SD 12%)) in patients who had major complications. For periacetabular resections not involving the ilium, significantly higher mean scores were obtained with ice-cream cone prostheses (79% (SD 17%); p = 0.031). CONCLUSION Functional outcome following periacetabular reconstruction is closely associated with the occurrence of complications requiring further surgery. For tumours treated with periacetabular and iliac resection, skeletal reconstruction may result in the best outcomes in the absence of complications, whereas nonskeletal reconstruction is a reasonable option if the risk of complications is high. For tumours requiring periacetabular resection without the ilium, reconstruction using an ice-cream cone prosthesis supported by antibiotic-laden cement is a reliable option. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(4):795-803.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomohiro Fujiwara
- The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.,Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | | | - Andrea Sambri
- The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Yusuke Tsuda
- The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Rhys Clark
- The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Michael C Parry
- The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Robert J Grimer
- The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Lee Jeys
- The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pelvic Chondrosarcoma Treated by En Bloc Resection with Patient-Specific Osteotomy Guides and Reimplantation of the Extracorporeally Irradiated Bone as an Osseocartilaginous Structural Orthotopic Autograft: A Report of Two Cases with Description of the Surgical Technique. Case Rep Orthop 2021; 2021:5512143. [PMID: 33868736 PMCID: PMC8035037 DOI: 10.1155/2021/5512143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Revised: 03/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Primary tumors of the pelvis are considered difficult to treat due to the complex anatomy and the proximity of important neurovascular structures. The surgical armamentarium for the treatment of these tumors has evolved with the help of cutting-edge technology from debilitating hemipelvectomies to solutions such as precise resections guided by patient-specific instruments or computer navigation and reconstruction by modular prostheses, 3D-printed custom-made implants, or orthotopic autograft reimplantation after extracorporeal irradiation. Different combinations of these techniques have been described in the literature with various rates of success. We present two cases of pelvic chondrosarcomas successfully treated by a combination of periacetabular resection with patient-specific osteotomy guides and orthotopic reimplantation of the extracorporeally irradiated autograft resulting in retention of the native hip.
Collapse
|
11
|
Fujiwara T, Stevenson J, Parry M, Le Nail LR, Tsuda Y, Grimer R, Jeys L. Pelvic reconstruction using an ice-cream cone prosthesis: correlation between the inserted length of the coned stem and surgical outcome. Int J Clin Oncol 2021; 26:1139-1146. [PMID: 33721114 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-021-01882-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acetabular reconstruction using an ice-cream cone prosthesis has been a reliable reconstruction option following pelvic tumour resection. However, it remains unknown which factor determines the success of this procedure. We aimed to determine risk factors for complications and functional loss in acetabular reconstruction using an ice-cream cone prosthesis. PATIENTS AND METHODS Fifty-four patients with malignant bone tumours who underwent acetabular reconstruction using an ice-cream cone prosthesis between 2004 and 2016 were studied. The bone-stem ratio was calculated as the ratio of the inserted length into the bone per the entire stem length. RESULTS A total of 26 (48%) patients had at least one complication and 11 patients (20%) required surgical interventions. The complication rates were 71% and 40% with a bone-stem ratio ≤ 50% and > 50%, respectively (p = 0.026), and the bone-stem ratio significantly stratified the risk of complications (≤ 50%: OR, 4.67 versus > 50%; p = 0.048). The mean MSTS score at the final follow-up was 60% (range 23-97%): the scores were significantly lower in patients with complications/leg-length discrepancy (52%) than in those without (79%; p = 0.002). The mean score with a bone-stem ratio ≤ 50% was significantly lower than the score with a ratio > 50%, especially in patients who underwent non-navigated reconstructions (33% versus 64%; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION The inserted length of the coned stem into residual bone was predictive of complications and functional outcome. Surgical indication for this procedure should be considered with the size of the remaining ilium to stabilise the prosthesis with a coned stem longer than half length.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomohiro Fujiwara
- Department of Oncology, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.
| | - Jonathan Stevenson
- Department of Oncology, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Michael Parry
- Department of Oncology, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Louis-Romée Le Nail
- Department of Oncology, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Yusuke Tsuda
- Department of Oncology, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Robert Grimer
- Department of Oncology, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Lee Jeys
- Department of Oncology, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Yi C, Zheng J, Li R, Lan Y, He M, Lai J, Guan T, Pang F, Mo Z, Chen P, Li Y, Zhou N, Yang X, Fang B. Preliminary proposal: a classification system for reconstruction with autologous femoral head after periacetabular tumors resection. J Orthop Surg Res 2021; 16:119. [PMID: 33557910 PMCID: PMC7869519 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02275-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although researchers have adopted various methods for the resection and reconstruction of periacetabular tumors, the total incidence rate of complications remains high. Aiming for preserving the acetabulum and reducing the risk of complications, we applied a surgery method using tumor-free autologous femoral head to reconstruct the defective acetabulum after resection of periacetabular tumors followed by performing a conventional total hip arthroplasty (THA). Moreover, we proposed a preliminary classification system for these surgery methods. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 6 patients treated with acetabulum reconstruction combined with autologous femoral head following peri-acetabulum resection between April 2010 and May 2018. All patients were diagnosed as periacetabular tumors including chondrosarcoma (n = 5) and chondroblastoma (n = 1). Clinical data such as age, diagnosis, complications, local recurrence or metastasis, and function (Musculoskeletal Tumor Society 1993, MSTS93) were documented. The average time of follow-up was 62.5 months (range, 17 to 106 months). RESULTS A total of 5 patients survive with average MSTS93 score of 27.8 points (range, 26-30). One patient, suffering from multiple bone metastasis prior treatment, ended up dying. One who had received radiotherapy before surgery had poor incision healing. Further, a classification system was preliminary proposed in 2 patients involving the pubis (type A) and 4 patients involving ischium (type B). CONCLUSIONS Based on the results, we preliminary proposed a classification system for reconstruction with autologous femoral head after periacetabular low malignant tumors resection. The clinical results suggested that surgery methods involving pubis (type A) and ischium (Type B) are safe and feasible. However, further researches should be conducted to verify our classification system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunzhi Yi
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Jiaqian Zheng
- The First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Ruoyu Li
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China
- The First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Yun Lan
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Mincong He
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Jieqing Lai
- The First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Tianan Guan
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Fengxiang Pang
- The First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Zongquan Mo
- The First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Peng Chen
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Yue Li
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Nannan Zhou
- The First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Xingfu Yang
- The First Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Bin Fang
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fujiwara T, Sree DV, Stevenson J, Kaneuchi Y, Parry M, Tsuda Y, Le Nail L, Medellin RM, Grimer R, Jeys L. Acetabular reconstruction with an ice‐cream cone prosthesis following resection of pelvic tumors: Does computer navigation improve surgical outcome? J Surg Oncol 2020; 121:1104-1114. [DOI: 10.1002/jso.25882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2019] [Accepted: 02/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tomohiro Fujiwara
- Department of OncologyThe Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Birmingham UK
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryOkayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences Okayama Japan
| | - Deepak V. Sree
- Department of OncologyThe Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Birmingham UK
| | - Jonathan Stevenson
- Department of OncologyThe Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Birmingham UK
| | - Yoichi Kaneuchi
- Department of OncologyThe Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Birmingham UK
| | - Michael Parry
- Department of OncologyThe Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Birmingham UK
| | - Yusuke Tsuda
- Department of OncologyThe Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Birmingham UK
| | - Louis‐Romée Le Nail
- Department of OncologyThe Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Birmingham UK
| | - Ricardo M. Medellin
- Department of OncologyThe Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Birmingham UK
| | - Robert Grimer
- Department of OncologyThe Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Birmingham UK
| | - Lee Jeys
- Department of OncologyThe Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Birmingham UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fujiwara T, Lex JR, Stevenson JD, Tsuda Y, Clark R, Parry MC, Grimer RJ, Jeys LM. Surgical treatment for pelvic Ewing sarcoma: What is a safe and functional acetabular reconstruction when combined with modern multidisciplinary treatments? J Surg Oncol 2019; 120:985-993. [PMID: 31381161 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2019] [Accepted: 07/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to clarify which local treatment is oncologically and functionally effective in pelvic Ewing sarcoma (ES). METHODS A consecutive series of patients who underwent pelvic resections and acetabular reconstructions after chemotherapy between 1986 and 2016 at a supra-regional center were evaluated. RESULTS The cohort consisted of 35 patients. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was 61% and 72%, respectively. Preoperative radiotherapy (RT) and surgery provided an excellent/good histological response in 92% and achieved significantly better OS (5 years, 64%) and LRFS (5 years, 100%) than surgery alone or surgery with postoperative RT. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society functional scores were significantly better in patients with hip transposition than those with structural reconstructions (74% vs 57%; P = .031) using custom-made prostheses, irradiated autografts, and ice-cream cone prostheses. These scores were significantly lower if patients had deep infection (P = .035), which was the most common complication (28%) in structural reconstructions but did not occur in hip transposition even when performed after preoperative RT. CONCLUSION Acetabular reconstruction with hip transposition resulted in no deep infection and superior function in patients with pelvic ES even when combined with preoperative RT, which improved tumor necrosis and rate of local control and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomohiro Fujiwara
- Oncology Service, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Johnathan R Lex
- Oncology Service, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Yusuke Tsuda
- Oncology Service, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Rhys Clark
- Oncology Service, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Michael C Parry
- Oncology Service, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Robert J Grimer
- Oncology Service, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Lee M Jeys
- Oncology Service, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Brown TS, Salib CG, Rose PS, Sim FH, Lewallen DG, Abdel MP. Reconstruction of the hip after resection of periacetabular oncological lesions: a systematic review. Bone Joint J 2018; 100-B:22-30. [PMID: 29292336 PMCID: PMC6424434 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.100b1.bjj-2017-0548.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2017] [Accepted: 06/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Aims Reconstruction of the acetabulum after resection of a periacetabular
malignancy is technically challenging and many different techniques
have been used with varying success. Our aim was to prepare a systematic
review of the literature dealing with these techniques in order
to clarify the management, the rate of complications and the outcomes. Patients and Methods A search of PubMed and MEDLINE was conducted for English language
articles published between January 1990 and February 2017 with combinations
of key search terms to identify studies dealing with periacetabular
resection with reconstruction in patients with a malignancy. Studies
in English that reported radiographic or clinical outcomes were
included. Data collected from each study included: the number and
type of reconstructions, the pathological diagnosis of the lesions,
the mean age and follow-up, gender distribution, implant survivorship, complications,
functional outcome, and mortality. The results from individual studies
were combined for the general analysis, and then grouped according
to the type of reconstruction. Results A total of 57 studies met the inclusion criteria and included
1700 patients. Most lesions were metastatic (41%), followed by chondrosarcoma
(29%), osteosarcoma (10%), Ewing’s sarcoma (7%), and multiple myeloma
(2%). The techniques of reconstruction were divided into seven types
for analysis: those involving a Harrington reconstruction, a saddle
prosthesis, an allograft and allograft prosthesis composite, a pasteurised
autograft, a porous tantalum implant, a custom-made prosthesis and
a modular hemipelvic reconstruction. The rate of complications was
50%, with infection (14%) and instability (8%) being the most common.
Mortality data were available for 1427 patients (84%); 50% had died
of disease progression, 23% were alive with disease, and 27% had no
evidence of disease at a mean follow-up of 3.4 years (0 to 34). Conclusion Both the rate of complications and mortality are high following
resection of oncological periacetabular lesions and reconstruction.
Many types of reconstruction have been used with unique challenges
and complications for each technique. Newer prostheses, including
custom-made prostheses and porous tantalum implants and augments, have
shown promising early functional and radiographic outcomes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B(1
Supple A):22–30.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T S Brown
- Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - C G Salib
- Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - P S Rose
- Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - F H Sim
- Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - D G Lewallen
- Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - M P Abdel
- Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|