Surgical resection of the primary tumor leads to prolonged survival in metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma

Neuroendocrine Tumors of Unknown Primary in the Setting of Cytoreductive Hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

Surgical cytoreduction for neuroendocrine tumor liver metastasis (NETLM) consistently shows positive long-term outcomes. Despite reservations in guidelines for surgery when the primary tumor is unidentified (UP-NET), this study compared the surgical and oncologic long-term outcomes between patients with these rare cases undergoing cytoreductive surgery and patients who had liver resection for known primaries.

METHODS

The study identified 32 unknown primary liver metastases (UP-NETLM) in 522 retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent resection of well-differentiated NETLM between January 2000 and December 2020. Tumor and patient characteristics were compared with those in 490 cases of liver metastasis from small intestinal (SI-NETLM) or pancreatic (pNETLM) primaries. Survival analysis was performed to highlight long-term outcome differences. Surgical outcomes were compared between liver resections alone and simultaneous primary resections to assess surgical risk distinctions.

RESULTS

The UP-NET patients had fewer NETLMs (p = 0.004), which on the average were larger than SI-NETLMs or pNETLMs (p = 0.002). Expression of Ki-67 was balanced among the groups. Major hepatectomy was performed more often in the UP-NETLM group (p = 0.017). The 10-year survival rate of 53% for UP-NETLM was comparable with that for SI-NETML (58%; p = 0.463) and pNETLMs (47%; p = 0.497). The median hepatic progression-free survival was 26 months for the UP-NETLM patients and 25 months for the SI-NETLM patients compared to 12 months for the pNETLM patients (p < 0.001). Perioperative mortality was lower than 2%, and severe postoperative morbidity occurred in 21%, similarly distributed among all the groups.

CONCLUSION

The surgical risk and long-term outcomes for the UP-NETLM patients were comparable with those for other NETLM cases, affirming the validity of equally aggressive surgical cytoreduction as a therapeutic option in carefully selected cases.

Multidisciplinary Approach for the Management of Metastatic Poorly Differentiated Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Pancreas: A Case Report of an Exceptional Responder

ABSTRACT

Poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (pNECs) are rare, highly aggressive neoplasms. Frequently metastatic at diagnosis, prognosis is poor with median overall survival estimated to be less than 1 year. Although multidisciplinary management, including systemic medications and locoregional therapies aimed at reducing and preventing symptoms caused by mass effect, is the mainstay of treatment for patients with metastatic well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, rapid progression, organ dysfunction, and poor performance status often preclude initiation of even single-modality palliative chemotherapy for patients with metastatic pNEC, limiting the use of and recommendation for multidisciplinary management.We describe the case of a 51-year-old male patient diagnosed with pNEC metastatic to liver and lymph nodes presenting with impending cholestatic liver failure for whom we were able to successfully initiate and dose-escalate cytotoxic chemotherapy with excellent radiographic response. After multidisciplinary review of his case, the patient underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy and hepatic wedge biopsies, with pathology demonstrating a pathologic complete response to chemotherapy in both the pancreas and liver. Surveillance scans at 2 years from initial diagnosis and 1 year from surgery remain without evidence of locoregional or distant recurrence, highlighting the importance and utility of multidisciplinary management in select cases.

Prognostic factors of pancreatic tumors in children and adolescents: a population study based on the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database

PURPOSE

Pancreatic tumors in children are uncommon, and data is scarce. The purpose of this study is to examine the prognostic factors of pediatric pancreatic tumors in a population-based cohort.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify all pediatric patients with pancreatic tumors diagnosed between 1975 and 2018. The overall survival (OS) rates were determined using a Kaplan-Meier analysis. The log-rank test was used for univariate survival analysis. Cox proportional-hazards regression was used to determine the variables related to OS.

RESULTS

We identified 195 children with pancreatic tumors, with a median age at diagnosis of 16 years. Tumors were classified as neuroendocrine tumors (33.8%), solid pseudopapillary tumors (SPTs) (32.3%), pancreatoblastoma (11.3%), and others (22.6%). Of the patients, 30.3% had distant metastases, and 69.7% had surgery. Pancreatoblastomas were more common in younger children, whereas solid pseudopapillary tumors were more common in female patients. Overall 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates for all patients were 90.3%, 79.2%, and 77.7%, respectively. The Cox proportional hazard regression revealed that SEER stage and surgery were significant independent predictors of overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreatic tumors are rare in children, and overall survival is grim except for SPTs. SEER stage and surgery were determined to be the most relevant determinants of OS in our study.

ALKBH5 enhances lipid metabolism reprogramming by increasing stability of FABP5 to promote pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms progression in an m6A-IGF2BP2-dependent manner

The process of post-transcriptional regulation has been recognized to be significantly impacted by the presence of N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification. As an m6A demethylase, ALKBH5 has been shown to contribute to the progression of different cancers by increasing expression of several oncogenes. Hence, a better understanding of the key targets of ALKBH5 in cancer cells could potentially lead to the development of new therapeutic targets. However, the specific role of ALKBH5 in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) remains largely unknown. Here, we demonstrated that ALKBH5 was up-regulated in pNENs and played a critical role in tumor growth and lipid metabolism. Mechanistically, ALKBH5 over-expression was found to increase the expression of FABP5 in an m6A-IGF2BP2 dependent manner, leading to disorders in lipid metabolism. Additionally, ALKBH5 was found to activate PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway, resulting in enhanced lipid metabolism and proliferation abilities. In conclusion, our study uncovers the ALKBH5/IGF2BP2/FABP5/mTOR axis as a mechanism for aberrant m6A modification in lipid metabolism and highlights a new molecular basis for the development of therapeutic strategies for pNENs treatment.

Surgery of primary lung carcinoid tumors at metastatic stage: A national study from the French Group of Endocrine Tumors (GTE) and ENDOCAN-RENATEN network

The outcome following surgery for patients with primary lung neuroendocrine tumors at metastatic stage remains poorly characterized. We conducted a retrospective national study including patients with metastatic lung neuroendocrine tumors at diagnosis. We performed a safety study to evaluate major morbidity and mortality of surgical resection of the primary tumor and compared patients in the operative to the nonoperative group. A total of 155 patients were included: 41 in the operative group and 114 in the nonoperative group, median age was 64 years. Metastases were mainly located in the liver (74.2%) and the bone (49.7%). The primary endpoint was met as the rate of major complications was 4.9% and there was no postoperative mortality. In the operative group 42.5% of patients had improvement of their pulmonary symptoms versus 14.4% in the nonoperative group. The median overall survival was not reached in the operative group and was 4.3 years (95% CI [3.5;4.9]) in the nonoperative group (univariate analysis, HR = 0.42 95% CI [0.23-0.77], p = .002). After multivariate analysis, only an ECOG-PS ≥1 (vs. 0, HR = 2.44, 95% CI [1.46;4.07], p = .001) and >1 metastatic site (vs. 1; HR = 1.83, 95% CI [1.06;3.16], p = .030) remained significantly associated with overall survival. The resection of the primary tumor was not significantly associated with overall survival (HR = 0.63, 95% CI [0.32;1.24], p = .183). In conclusion, surgery of primary lung neuroendocrine tumors at metastatic stage is a safe option that should be considered in selected patients in order to improve symptoms with a view to improving their quality of life. Larger studies are warranted to evaluate the impact of surgery on survival.

Primary tumor resection enhances the survival of pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma patients with liver metastasis under the definition of 2019 WHO classification

BACKGROUND

With the update and release of the newest version of WHO classification (2019) for neuroendocrine neoplasm, the clinical features, risk factors of prognosis and the effect of surgical treatment on newly classified pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (pNEC) patients with liver metastasis were not deeply analyzed. In the present study, we tried to reveal the clinical features, and prognostic factors of pNEC patients with liver metastasis with the newest definition of WHO 2019, and explore whether primary tumor resection (PTR), chemotherapy and radiotherapy affect overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in those patients.

METHODS

We collected data from pNEC patients with liver metastasis from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database who were diagnosed between 2010 and 2019. We strictly selected pNEC patients according to the 2019 WHO classification criteria. The univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to determine independent predictors of the survival of these patients. The forest plots map was drawn by R-4.2.2 software to display the results of the multivariate analysis visually. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the OS and CSS. Based on the multivariate analysis outcomes, we established the predictable nomogram model to predict the prognosis of pNEC patients with liver metastasis. The calibration plots were shown to prove the predictive value of the nomogram predictable model.

RESULTS

We identified 205 eligible pNEC patients with liver metastasis. According to the multivariable Cox regression analysis in this study, we found that PTR, chemotherapy, primary tumor size and diagnosis to treatment time were independent prognostic factors for both OS and CSS. Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated that PTR and chemotherapy were correlated with increased survival for pNEC patients with liver metastasis. The accuracy of the nomogram model was visually proved by the calibration plot with acceptable predictive performance.

CONCLUSION

Four independent predictors of prognosis in pNEC patients with liver metastasis were identified in this study, including PTR, chemotherapy, tumor size and diagnosis to treatment time. PTR and chemotherapy for pNEC with liver metastasis could lead to a better prognosis, which may provide inspiration for practical clinical guidelines.

PDZ-binding kinase aggravates pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm progression by activating the AKT/mTOR pathway

The therapeutic effects of existing drug regimens against pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) remain limited, and identifying ideal therapeutic targets is warranted. PDZ binding kinase (PBK) may play an oncogenic role in most solid tumors. However, its function in pNEN remains unclear. In this study, pNEN samples and International Cancer Genome Consortium data were used to determine the clinical significance of PBK. Cell counting and CCK8 assays were used to assess cell proliferation. Flow cytometry was used to assess drug-induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. An in vivo PBK-targeting experiment was performed in mice bearing pNENs. Western blotting, quantitative PCR, and immunohistochemistry were performed to assess the molecular mechanisms. PBK was significantly upregulated in pNEN tissues compared with paracancerous tissues. Additionally, PBK was a poor prognostic factor for pNEN patients. PBK was found to promote the proliferation of pNEN cells by activating the AKT/mTOR pathway. Furthermore, PBK inhibition combined with everolimus treatment had enhanced antitumour effects on pNEN via inhibiting AKT/mTOR pathway and inducing G0/G1 phase cell cycle arrest. This study highlights that PBK plays an oncogenic role in and is a promising therapeutic target for pNEN.

Analysis of Risk Factors for Distant Metastasis of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma without Regional Lymph Node Metastasis and a Nomogram Prediction Model for Survival

Background

Negative regional lymph nodes do not indicate a lack of distant metastasis. A considerable number of patients with negative regional lymph node pancreatic cancer will skip the step of regional lymph node metastasis and directly develop distant metastasis.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with negative regional lymph node pancreatic cancer and distant metastasis in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2010 to 2015. Multivariate logistic analysis and Cox analysis were used to determine the independent risk factors that promoted distant metastasis and the 1-, 2-, and 3-year cancer-specific survival in this subgroup.

Results

Sex, age, pathological grade, surgery, radiotherapy, race, tumor location, and tumor size were significantly correlated with distant metastasis (P < 0.05). Among these factors, pathological grade II and above, tumor site other than the pancreatic head, and tumor size >40 mm were independent risk factors for distant metastasis; age ≥60 years, tumor size ≤21 mm, surgery, and radiation were protective factors against distant metastasis. Age, pathological grade, surgery, chemotherapy, and metastasis site were identified as predictors of survival. Among them, age ≥40 years, pathological grade II and above, and multiple distant metastasis were considered independent risk factors for cancer-specific survival. Surgery and chemotherapy were considered protective factors for cancer-specific survival. The prediction performance of the nomogram was significantly better than that of the traditional American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor, node, metastasis staging system. We also established an online dynamic nomogram calculator, which can predict the survival rate of patients at different follow-up time points.

Conclusion

Pathological grade, tumor location, and tumor size were independent risk factors for distant metastasis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with negative regional lymph nodes. Older age, smaller tumor size, surgery, and radiotherapy were protective factors against distant metastasis. A new nomogram that was constructed could effectively predict cancer-specific survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with negative regional lymph nodes and distant metastasis. Furthermore, an online dynamic nomogram calculator was established.

Primary tumor resection improves survival of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma patients with nonresected liver metastases

BACKGROUND

The role of primary tumor resection (PTR) in the survival of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma (GI-NEC) patients with liver metastases only remains poorly defined. Therefore, we investigated the impact of PTR on the survival of GI-NEC patients with nonresected liver metastases.

METHODS

GI-NEC patients with a liver-confined metastatic disease diagnosed between 2016 and 2018 were identified in the National Cancer Database. Multiple imputations by chained equations were used to account for missing data, and the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was used to eliminate selection bias. Overall survival (OS) was compared by adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test with IPTW.

RESULTS

A total of 767 GI-NEC patients with nonresected liver metastases were identified. Among all patients, 177 (23.1%) received PTR and had a significantly favorable OS before (median: 43.6 months [interquartile range, IQR, 10.3-64.4] vs. 8.8 months [IQR, 2.1-23.1], p < 0.001 in log-rank test) and after (median: 25.7 months [IQR, 10.0-64.4] vs. 9.3 months [IQR, 2.2-26.4], p < 0.001 in IPTW-adjusted log-rank test) the IPTW adjustment. Additionally, this survival advantage persisted in an adjusted Cox model (IPTW adjusted hazard ratio = 0.431, 95% confidence interval: 0.332-0.560; p < 0.001). The improved survival persisted in subgroups stratified by primary tumor site, tumor grade, and N stage, even in the complete cohort (excluding patients with missing data).

CONCLUSIONS

PTR led to improved survival for GI-NEC patients with nonresected liver metastases regardless of primary tumor site, tumor grade, and N stage. However, the decision for PTR should be made on an individualized basis following multidisciplinary evaluation.

Comparison of nomogram for Primary Nonfunctional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors based on the 7th vs 8th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual

BACKGROUND

Our study aimed to construct and validate prognostic nomograms for predicting survival for patients with Nonfunctional Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (NF-pNET).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 1824 patients diagnosed with NF-pNET in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database between 2004 and 2016. Randomization divided the patients into training (n = 1278) and validation (n = 546) cohorts. Prognostic factors were determined using Cox regression analyses, nomograms based on AJCC 7th and 8th staging system were constructed separately. The prediction models were validated using internal validation and external validation.

RESULTS

Age, year of diagnosis, primary tumor site, grade, 7th or 8th TNM stage, surgery, tumor size were determined as prognostic indicator to construct two nomograms. Harrell's concordance index (C-index) of two nomograms exhibited a clinical predictive ability of 0.828 (95%CI, 0.808~0.849) vs 0.828 (95% CI, 0.808~0.849) in the internal verification. The c-index in the external validation was 0.812 (95%CI, 0.778~0.864) vs 0.814 (95% CI, 0.779~0.848). The predictive power of the two nomograms is comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

Our nomogram may be a effective tool for predicting overall survival in patients with NF-pNET. The AJCC 8th-edition system provides discrimination similar to that of the 7th-edition system.

Surgery, Liver Directed Therapy and Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Liver Metastases

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are described by the World Health Organization (WHO) classification by grade (1–3) and degree of differentiation. Grade 1 and 2; well differentiated PNETs are often characterized as relatively “indolent” tumors for which locoregional therapies have been shown to be effective for palliation of symptom control and prolongation of survival even in the setting of advanced disease. The treatment of liver metastases includes surgical and non-surgical modalities with varying degrees of invasiveness; efficacy; and risk. Most of these modalities have not been prospectively compared. This paper reviews literature that has been published on treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine liver metastases using surgery; liver directed embolization and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). Surgery is associated with the longest survival in patients with resectable disease burden. Liver-directed (hepatic artery) therapies can sometimes convert patients with borderline disease into candidates for surgery. Among the three embolization modalities; the preponderance of data suggests chemoembolization offers superior radiographic response compared to bland embolization and radioembolization; but all have similar survival. PRRT was initially approved as salvage therapy in patients with advanced disease that was not amenable to resection or embolization; though the role of PRRT is evolving rapidly

Is There a Role for Surgical Resection of Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Neoplasms?

BACKGROUND

Grade 3 (G3) gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are aggressive tumors with poor survival outcomes for which medical management is generally recommended. This study sought to evaluate outcomes of surgically treated G3 GEP-NEN patients.

METHODS

A single-institutional prospective NEN database was reviewed. Patients with G3 GEP-NENs based on World Health Organization (WHO) 2019 definitions included well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (G3NET) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (G3NEC). Clinicopathologic factors were compared between groups. Overall survival from G3 diagnosis was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Surgical resection was performed for 463 patients (211 G1, 208 G2, 44 G3). Most had metastatic disease at presentation (54% G1, 69% G2, 91% G3; p < 0.001). The G3 cohort included 39 G3NETs and 5 G3NECs, 22 of pancreatic and 22 of midgut origin. Median overall survival (mOS; in months) was 268.1 for G1NETs, 129.9 for G2NETs, 50.5 for G3NETs, and 28.5 for G3NECs (p < 0.001). Over the same period, 31 G3 patients (12 G3NETs, 19 G3NECs) were treated non-surgically, with mOS of 19.0 for G3NETs and 12.4 for G3NECs.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection of G3 GEP-NENs remains controversial due to poor prognosis, and surgical series are rare. This large, single-institutional study found significantly lower mOS in patients with resected G3NENs than those with G1/G2 tumors, reflecting more aggressive tumor biology and a higher proportion with metastatic disease. The mOS for resected G3NETs and G3NECs exceeded historical non-surgical G3NEN series (mOS 11-19 months), suggesting surgery should be considered in carefully selected patients with G3NENs, especially those with well-differentiated tumors.

Analysis of Clinical Characteristics and Survival in Patients With Functional Neuroendocrine Tumors of Gastrointestinal Origin

OBJECTIVES

Functional neuroendocrine tumors (FNETs) are characterized by excess secretion of disease-specific hormones. In this study, we attempted to define survival trends in patients with some of these uncommon tumors.

METHODS

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, 529 patients with FNETs (gastrinoma, insulinoma, glucagonoma, VIPoma, and somatostatinoma) were identified. We analyzed patient and tumor characteristics, overall survival, and cancer-specific survival.

RESULTS

Functional neuroendocrine tumors were found to be more predominant in White patients older than 50 years. Most common FNETs were gastrinoma (56.3%) and insulinoma (23.8%). Most FNETs were found in the pancreas, with the second most common location being the small bowel. Surgery was the primary modality of treatment, used in 55.8% of the cases. Median overall survival was 9.8 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.9-11.8) with a median cancer-specific survival of 18.5 years (95% CI, 12.8-24.2). In multivariate analysis, age >50 years (hazard ratio [HR], 2.7; 95% CI, 2.02-3.64), no surgical resection (HR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.43-2.46), metastasis (HR, 3.0; 95% CI, 2.0-4.5), and poor differentiation were associated with poor survival. Site and histology did not have a significant impact on survival (P = 0.82 and 0.57 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlights the most important prognostic factors for gastrointestinal FNETs.

Surgical Outcomes, Long-Term Survivals and Staging Systems of World Health Organization G3 Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Background: In 2017, the World Health Organization (WHO) defined a new category of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms named G3 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (p-NETs), whose surgical outcomes, long-term survivals and staging systems have not been well documented. Methods: Data from eligible patients with G3 p-NETs defined using the WHO 2017 grading classification at our institute were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Our study enrolled 80 patients with WHO G3 p-NETs, including 50 women and 30 men. The accumulative 5-year overall survival (OS) of G3 p-NETs was 29.7%. The current staging system by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) failed to discriminate the survival difference between Stage II and Stage III (p = 0.172), while notable differences with regard to the OS were statistically offered between each stage using the modified tumor−node−metastasis (mTNM) staging system (all p < 0.05). The OS of patients receiving surgical resection was significantly better than those with palliative operation (p < 0.05). Both the current AJCC system and proposed mTNM system were independent predictors for the OS of G3 p-NETs (p = 0.017 and p = 0.032, respectively). The 95% confidence intervals of the proposed mTNM staging system were smaller than that of the current AJCC system (0.626−8.217 and 0.329−10.013, respectively), indicating a relatively more accurate predictive ability. Conclusion: Our demonstration revealed that surgical resection was an independent predictor for the favorable prognosis of patients with G3 p-NETs. Moreover, the new mTNM staging system was more suitable and practical than the current AJCC system for stratifying G3 p-NETs into prognostic groups.

Survival Benefit of Surgical Resection for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors With Oligometastatic Liver Metastasis: A Retrospective and Propensity Score-Matching Analysis

Background

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) are a heterogeneous group of pancreatic malignancies. Surgical resection is the only curative treatment option for patients with localized PanNETs, yet the role of cancer-directed surgery (CDS) in the setting of oligometastatic liver metastasis remains a controversy.

Methods

All patients diagnosed with PanNETs and liver-only metastasis from 2010 to 2018 were identified from the SEER database. The biases of baseline characteristics between CDS and no-CDS cohorts were reduced by the propensity score-matching (PSM) method, and the prognostic role of CDS was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression models. Logistic regression analysis was utilized to identify factors associated with patients who underwent CDS.

Results

A total of 1,270 PanNET patients with oligometastatic liver metastasis were included and analyzed. Of these patients, 283 (22.3%) patients underwent CDS of the primary tumor, while the remaining 987 (77.7%) did not. The OS and CSS were significantly better in the CDS cohort regardless of the propensity score analysis. Multivariate analysis revealed that age, tumor differentiation, tumor location, and lymph node status were significantly associated with patients who were more likely to receive CDS.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated that CDS was associated with survival benefits in selected patients with PanNETs and liver-only metastasis based on a large population database.

A Nomogram to Accurately Identify Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Metastasizing to Distant Organs: A Study Based on Two National Population-Based Cohorts From the United States and China

Background:

Distant organ metastasis is the leading cause of death in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNET) patients. In the present study, we aimed to develop and validate a nomogram that could accurately identify pNET metastasizing to distant organs.

Methods:

The cases extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program were assigned to the training cohort and validation cohort. The cases from the Chinese Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors program were assigned to the external validation cohort. The strategy was developed with the support of a nomogram, and the predictive value of this strategy was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results:

In total, 2024 American cases were involved in the present study. Besides, 1450 and 574 patients were allocated into training and internal validation cohorts, respectively. In addition, 122 Chinese patients were assigned to the external validation cohort. The results of the univariate logistic regression analysis suggested that tumor grade, tumor size, and the number of metastatic lymph nodes were the risk of metastasis to distant organs, and these 3 clinicopathological characteristics were used to develop the nomogram. We observed that the accuracy of the nomogram for predicting metastasis to distant organs was 0.797, 0.819, and 0.837 in the training cohort, internal validation cohort, and external validation cohort, respectively.

Conclusions:

A predictive nomogram was developed and validated, and it showed an acceptable performance in predicting metastasis to distant organs. The results will enable clinicians to identify pNETs, metastasizing to distant organs, and develop an effective individualized therapeutic strategy for these patients.

Role of surgical treatments in high-grade or advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Over the last 40 years, the incidence and prevalence of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) have continued to increase. Compared to other epithelial neoplasms in the same organ, GEP-NENs exhibit indolent biological behavior, resulting in more chances to undergo surgery. However, the role of surgery in high-grade or advanced GEP-NENs is still controversial. Surgery is associated with survival improvement of well-differentiated high-grade GEP-NENs, whereas poorly differentiated GEP-NENs that may benefit from resection require careful selection based on Ki67 and other tissue biomarkers. Additionally, surgery also plays an important role in locally advanced and metastatic disease. For locally advanced GEP-NENs, isolated major vascular involvement is no longer an absolute contraindication. In the setting of metastatic GEP-NENs, radical intended surgery is recommended for patients with low-grade and resectable metastases. For unresectable metastatic disease, a variety of surgical approaches, including cytoreduction of liver metastasis, liver transplantation, and surgery after neoadjuvant treatment, show survival benefits. Primary tumor resection in GEP-NENs with unresectable metastatic disease is associated with symptom control, prolonged survival, and improved sensitivity toward systemic therapies. Although there is no established neoadjuvant or adjuvant strategy, increasing attention has been given to this emerging research area. Some studies have reported that neoadjuvant therapy effectively reduces tumor burden, improves the effectiveness of subsequent surgery, and decreases surgical complications.

Surgical outcomes of gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors G3 versus neuroendocrine carcinoma

BACKGROUND

To define surgical outcomes of patients with high-grade gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm grade G3 (GEP-NEN G3).

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgical resection between 2000 and 2016 were identified. The overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients with gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors grade G3 (GEP-NET G3) versus neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Fifty-one out of 2182 (2.3%) patients who underwent surgical resection were diagnosed as GEP-NEN G3. The pancreas was the most common primary site (n = 3772.5%). A majority of patients had lymph node metastasis (n = 3262.7%); one in three (n = 1631.4%) had distant metastasis. The median OS and RFS of the entire cohort were 56.4 and 34.5 months, respectively. Perineural invasion was a strong prognostic factor associate with OS after surgical resection. Patients with NEC had a worse survival outcome versus patients with NET G3 (median OS: 33.1 months vs. not attained, p = 0.088). In contrast, among patients who underwent curative-intent resection, patients with NEC had comparable RFS versus patients with NET G3 (median RFS: 35.6 vs. 33.9 months, p = 0.774).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical resection provided acceptable short- and long-outcomes for well-selected patients with resectable GEP-NEN G3. NEC was associated with a worse OS versus NET G3.

[Importance of surgery in distant metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms]

The majority of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNEN) already present with distant metastases at diagnosis. The heterogeneity of pNEN and the broad spectrum of treatment options make adequate patient selection and an evidence-based strategy essential. In metastatic pNEN both primary resection and resection of liver metastases have been shown to improve overall survival. Surgical treatment of liver metastases can also be carried out with palliative intent, especially for symptomatic pNEN and can have a positive effect on disease-free survival and overall survival. Classical hepatectomy techniques and innovative techniques (two-stage resections, liver transplantation) are available to the surgeon. In complex growth types of liver metastases, there is increasing evidence for a combination of surgery and ablative methods. Due to a relevant risk of recurrence following liver resection, pNEN patients need to be included in multimodal treatment concepts. Current areas of interest in the treatment of metastatic pNEN are the use of adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery in G3-NEN and G3-NEC patients. The aim of this review is to give an overview on the impact of surgery in the situation of distant metastatic NEN of the pancreas.

Surgery in Patients with Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinomas, Neuroendocrine Tumors G3 and High Grade Mixed Neuroendocrine-Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

OPINION STATEMENT

In the 2019 WHO guidelines, the classification of gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP NEN) has changed from one being based on Ki-67 proliferation index alone to one that also includes tumor differentiation. Consequently, GEP NENs are now classified as well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (NET), NET G1 (Ki-67 <3%), NET G2 (Ki-67 3-20%) and NET G3 (Ki-67 >20%), and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) (Ki-67 >20%). It has been suggested that NET G3 should be treated as NET G2 with respect to surgery, while surgical management of NEC should be expanded from local disease to also include patients with advanced disease where curative surgery is possible. High grade mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNEN) have a neuroendocrine and a non-neuroendocrine component mostly with a poor prognosis. All studies evaluating the effect of surgery in NEC and MiNEN are observational and hold a risk of selection bias, which may overestimate the beneficial effect of surgery. Further, only a few studies on the effect of surgery in MiNEN exist. This review aims to summarize the data on the outcome of surgery in patients with GEP NET G3, GEP NEC and high grade MiNEN. The current evidence suggests that patients with NEN G3 and localized disease and NEN G3 patients with metastatic disease where curative surgery can be achieved may benefit from surgery. In patients with MiNEN, it is currently not possible to evaluate on the potential beneficial effect of surgery due to the low number of studies.

Surgical Treatment of Patients with Poorly Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: An NCDB Analysis

BACKGROUND

Consensus guidelines discourage resection of poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (panNEC) given its association with poor long-term survival. This study assessed treatment patterns and outcomes for this rare malignancy using the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

METHODS

Patients with non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in the NCDB (2004-2016) were categorized based on pathologic differentiation. Logistic and Cox proportional hazard regressions identified associations with resection and overall survival (OS). Survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests.

RESULTS

Most patients (83%) in the cohort of 8560 patients had well-differentiated tumors (panNET). The median OS was 47 months (panNET, 63 months vs panNEC, 17 months; p < 0.001). Surgery was less likely for older patients (odds ratio [OR], 0.97), patients with panNEC (OR, 0.27), and patients with metastasis at diagnosis (OR, 0.08) (all p < 0.001). After propensity score-matching of these factors, surgical resection was associated with longer OS (82 vs 29 months; p < 0.001) and a decreased hazard of mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.37; p < 0.001). Surgery remained associated with longer OS when stratified by differentiation (98 vs 41 months for patients with panNET and 36 vs 8 months for patients with panNEC). Overall survival did not differ between patients with panNEC who underwent surgery and patients with panNET who did not (both 39 months; p = 0.294).

CONCLUSIONS

Poorly differentiated panNEC exhibits poorer survival than well-differentiated panNET. In the current cohort, surgical resection was strongly and independently associated with improved OS, suggesting that patients with panNEC who are suitable operative candidates should be considered for multimodality therapy, including surgery.

Benefit of Primary Tumor Resection in Stage IV, Grade 1 and 2, Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Propensity-Score Matched Cohort Study

Objective

To determine the association of primary tumor resection in stage IV pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (Pan-NET) and survival in a propensity-score matched study.

Background

Pan-NET are often diagnosed with stage IV disease. The oncologic benefit from primary tumor resection in this scenario is debated and previous studies show contradictory results.

Methods

Patients from 3 tertiary referral centers from January 1, 1985, through December 31, 2019: Uppsala University Hospital (Uppsala, Sweden), Sahlgrenska University Hospital (Gothenburg, Sweden), and Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (Boston, USA) were assessed for eligibility. Patients with sporadic, grade 1 and 2, stage IV pan-NET, with baseline 2000-2019 were divided between those undergoing primary tumor resection combined with oncologic treatment (surgery group [SG]), and those who received oncologic treatment without primary tumor resection (non-SG). A propensity-score matching was performed to account for the variability in the extent of metastatic disease and comorbidity. Primary outcome was overall survival.

Results

Patients with stage IV Pan-NET (n = 733) were assessed for eligibility, 194 were included. Patients were divided into a SG (n = 65) and a non-SG (n = 129). Two isonumerical groups with 50 patients in each group remained after propensity-score matching. The 5-year survival was 65.4% (95% CI, 51.5-79.3) in the matched SG and 47.8% (95% CI, 30.6-65.0) in the matched non-SG (log-rank, P = 0.043).

Conclusions

Resection of the primary tumor in patients with stage IV Pan-NET and G1/G2 grade was associated with prolonged overall survival compared to nonoperative management. A surgically aggressive regime should be considered where resection is not contraindicated.

Trends in Incidence and Survival of Patients with Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasm, 1987-2016

Background

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (pNEN), with the lowest 5-year survival rates in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), exerts great threat to human health. Because large-scale population research aimed at pNEN is rare, we aimed to explore the tendencies and differences of changes in incidences and survival rates of pNEN in each decade from 1987 to 2016 and evaluate the impacts of age, sex, race, socioeconomic status (SES), and grade.

Methods

Data on pNEN cases from 1987 to 2016 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database. Kaplan-Meier, Cox proportional hazards regression analyses, and relative survival rates (RSRs) were used to identify risk factors for pNEN.

Results

The incidence and survival duration of pNEN increase every decade due to medical developments. The disparities of long-term survival in different age, sex, and grade groups expanded over time while that in race and SES groups narrowed. Older age and higher grade are independent risk factors for poorer survival. Females have lower incidence and longer survival than males. Prognosis of Black patients and poor (medium and high poverty) patients improved.

Conclusions

This study depicted changes in incidence and survival rates of pNEN over the past three decades and evaluated potential risk factors related to pNEN, benefiting future prediction of vulnerable and clinical options.

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms G3: Novel insights and unmet needs

According to the 2019 WHO pathology grading system, high-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) can be divided into well differentiated neuroendocrine tumors G3 (NETs G3) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). GEP-NETs G3 and GEP-NECs present significant differences in driver genes and disease origin. NETs G3 and NECs have been confirmed to be two distinct diseases with different genetic backgrounds, however, this issue remains controversial. The prognosis of NETs G3 is significantly better than that of NECs. The differential diagnosis of GEP-NETs G3 and GEP-NECs should be combined with the patient's medical history, tumor histopathology, Ki-67 index, DAXX/ATRX, TP53 and Rb expression as well as other immunohistochemical indicators. In addition, the treatment strategies of these two subgroups are very different. Here, we summarize recent findings focused on the genomics, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, treatment and other aspects of high-grade GEP-NENs (G3). This review may help further our understanding of the carcinogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of GEP-NENs G3.

Management of Primary Hepatopancreatobiliary and Ampulla Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

Background: Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the liver, gallbladder, pancreas, and ampulla is rare and usually arises in case reports, and thus to date, no studies have well described the treatment options and outcomes of those patients. Methods: The data of 108 patients diagnosed as hepatopancreatobiliary and ampulla LCNEC between 2004 and 2015 were retrieved from the surveillance, epidemiology, and final results. Results: In the entire cohort, the median overall survival (OS) was 10 months. For nonmetastatic patients, the median OS was 32 months for surgery of the primary tumor alone (n = 17), 19 months for surgery of the primary tumor and adjuvant therapy (n = 19), and 1 month for nonsurgical treatment (n = 8). For metastatic patients, the median OS was 14 months for patients who received surgery of the primary tumor with and without adjuvant therapy (n = 16), 9 months for patients undergoing adjuvant treatment alone (n = 30), and 1 month for patients who had no treatment (n = 16). Multivariate analysis revealed that surgery of the primary tumor was an independent factor for improved survival. Conclusions: This disease offers a very poor prognosis despite aggressive treatment. Radical resection is the first choice for resectable tumors, whereas surgical resection of the primary tumor plus adjuvant therapy might represent a valid option for metastatic disease. However, further studies are needed to confirm this.

Successful Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Small-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Pancreas: A Case Report

Neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors may potentially aid downstaging, increase the possibility of radical surgery. We herein report a case of a 63-year-old man who had been diagnosed with locally advanced small-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas of the pancreas according to the diagnostic biopsy. The patient received 6 courses of etoposide and cisplatin as neoadjuvant therapy in an attempt to stop tumor progression, which promoted obvious tumor shrinkage without adverse effects and allowed subsequent Appleby procedure, the distal pancreatectomy with celiac artery resection. The patient showed no recurrence in the follow-up of a contrast-enhanced computed tomographic scan, which is 8 months after surgery. To the best of our knowledge, this is a rare case to report etoposide and cisplatin administration before surgery for unresectable pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma promoted a pathological partial response and finally achieved a radical surgery, providing a novel therapeutic option for patients with locally advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma.

Surgical resection of high-grade nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma is associated with improved survival

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The role of surgery in the treatment of nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (PNEC) is not well defined. This study investigated the effect of surgical resection on cause-specific survival compared with nonoperative management.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database was utilized to identify patients with nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma diagnosed between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2015. Survival was modeled using Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Of the 488 patients identified, 137 (29%) underwent surgical resection of the primary site. Patients who underwent surgery had a median CSS of 31 months compared with 5 months in those who did not (p < 0.01). A survival benefit was observed when the cohort was stratified into local, nodal, and metastatic disease.

CONCLUSION

Resection of the primary site in the cohort of PNEC patients compiled by SEER is associated with improved survival. Further consideration be placed on primary surgical resection for PNEC while additional studies that can select specifically for high-grade, poorly differentiated carcinomas need to be undertaken.

The overriding role of surgery and tumor grade for long-term survival in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: A population-based cohort study

Background

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP‐NENs) comprise a heterogeneous disease group. Factors that affect long‐term survival remain uncertain. Complete population‐representative cohorts with long‐term follow‐up are scarce.

Aim

To evaluate factors of importance for the long‐term survival.

Methods and results

An Observational population‐based study on consecutive GEP‐NEN patients diagnosed from 2003 to 2013, managed according to national guidelines. Univariable and multivariable survival analyses were performed to evaluate overall survival (OS) and to identify independent prognostic factors. One hundred ninety eligible patients (males, 58.9%) (median age, 60.0 years; range, 10.0–94.2 years) were included. The small bowel, appendix, and pancreas were the most common tumor locations. The World Health Organization (WHO) tumor grade 1–3 distributions varied according to the primary location and disease stage. Primary surgery with curative intent was performed in 66% of the patients. The median OS of the study population was 183 months with 5‐ and 10‐year OS rates of 66% and 57%, respectively. Only age, WHO tumor grade, and primary surgical treatment were independent prognostic factors for OS.

Conclusion

The outcomes of GEP‐NEN patients are related to several factors including age and primary surgical treatment. WHO tumor grading, based on the established criteria, should be routine in clinical practice. This may improve clinical decision‐making and allow the comparison of outcomes among different centers.

Predicting the recurrence risk of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms after radical resection using deep learning radiomics with preoperative computed tomography images

Background

To establish and validate a prediction model for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) recurrence after radical surgery with preoperative computed tomography (CT) images.

Methods

We retrospectively collected data from 74 patients with pathologically confirmed pNENs (internal group: 56 patients, Hospital I; external validation group: 18 patients, Hospital II). Using the internal group, models were trained with CT findings evaluated by radiologists, radiomics, and deep learning radiomics (DLR) to predict 5-year pNEN recurrence. Radiomics and DLR models were established for arterial (A), venous (V), and arterial and venous (A&V) contrast phases. The model with the optimal performance was further combined with clinical information, and all patients were divided into high- and low-risk groups to analyze survival with the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

In the internal group, the areas under the curves (AUCs) of DLR-A, DLR-V, and DLR-A&V models were 0.80, 0.58, and 0.72, respectively. The corresponding radiomics AUCs were 0.74, 0.68, and 0.70. The AUC of the CT findings model was 0.53. The DLR-A model represented the optimum; added clinical information improved the AUC from 0.80 to 0.83. In the validation group, the AUCs of DLR-A, DLR-V, and DLR-A&V models were 0.77, 0.48, and 0.64, respectively, and those of radiomics-A, radiomics-V, and radiomics-A&V models were 0.56, 0.52, and 0.56, respectively. The AUC of the CT findings model was 0.52. In the validation group, the comparison between the DLR-A and the random models showed a trend of significant difference (P=0.058). Recurrence-free survival differed significantly between high- and low-risk groups (P=0.003).

Conclusions

Using DLR, we successfully established a preoperative recurrence prediction model for pNEN patients after radical surgery. This allows a risk evaluation of pNEN recurrence, optimizing clinical decision-making.

Does surgery provide a survival advantage in non-disseminated poorly differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms?

BACKGROUND

Attributable to the high likelihood of developing distant metastatic disease, resection of poorly differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms is generally contraindicated. Some patients with no distant metastatic disease will nonetheless undergo surgical resection and their outcomes are not known. We aimed to determine whether surgery confers survival advantage over systemic therapy alone for patients with non-metastatic poorly differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study (2000-2012) of adults in the California Cancer Registry who had poorly differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (World Health Organization Grade 3) and no clinical evidence of distant metastasis (M0). Patients who underwent surgery were compared with those managed non-operatively. The adjusted Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the risk of death.

RESULTS

Among 2,245 patients (45% female, 21% pancreatic, 79% gastrointestinal), 1,549 (69%) were treated with surgery, and 696 (31%) received either systemic therapy or palliative measures alone. Median survival was 31 months after surgery versus 9 months after non-operative therapy (log-rank test, P < .001). Rates of 5-year overall survival were 39% after surgery versus 10% in the non-operative group. Adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities, receipt of chemotherapy, and tumor size and location, patients treated with surgery had a 58% lower likelihood of death compared with non-operative therapy (hazard ratio: 0.42, 95% confidence interval: 0.36-0.50, P < .001). Restricting our results to those patients who were found to have no distant metastasis intraoperatively (ie, pathologically M0), 5-year survival after surgery reached 44%.

CONCLUSION

While poorly differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms carries a poor prognosis, for patients with no evidence of metastatic disease, resection appears to confer significant improvement in long-term survival. Although caution and an individualized approach in treating poorly differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms is advised, future guidelines might reflect this survival advantage.

Clinical Characteristics and Prognostic Factors of Early-Onset Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

BACKGROUND

The incidence of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) has increased significantly. The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients under 50 years old.

METHODS

Patients with PNETs recorded in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2004 to 2015 were analyzed. The clinical characteristics were analyzed by Chi-square test. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS). Multivariate Cox proportional risk regression analysis was used to determine independent prognostic factors.

RESULTS

2,303 patients included, of which 547 (23.8%) patients were younger than 50 years old. The number of younger patients has increased steadily, while the proportion in total PNETs decreased recently. Compared with older group, the proportion of the Black, grade I/II, and surgery were higher in early-onset PNETs. Liver was the most frequent metastatic site. There was no significant difference in the incidence of different metastatic sites between younger and older PNETs patients, while younger patients had better OS (P < 0.05). Grade, N stage, M stage, and surgery were independent prognostic factors for OS in early-onset PNETs.

CONCLUSIONS

Younger patients have unique clinicopathological characteristics compared with older patients in PNETs. Better OS was observed in younger patients which might due to the higher proportion of well-differentiated tumor and surgery than older patients.

Primary tumour resection for synchronously metastatic phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma: A population-based study

CONTEXT

Until recently, there are few effective treatment options for patients with synchronous metastatic phaeochromocytoma (PHEO) and paraganglioma (PGL). Surgical resection may improve the survival outcomes of these patients.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the role of surgical resection of the primary tumour in patients with synchronous metastatic PHEO and PGL.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of patients with synchronous metastatic PHEO/PGL using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (1988-2016).

PATIENTS

Patients with synchronous metastatic PHEO/PGL who underwent primary tumour resection.

MEASUREMENTS

Overall survival and Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 99 patients with metastatic PHEO and 127 metastatic PGL patients were identified from the SEER database. Compared to metastatic PHEO, metastatic PGL patients had a better overall survival (5-year survival rate: 33.3% vs. 49.0%, p = .001). In metastatic PHEO patients, 53 (53.5%) patients underwent surgery for primary site. Surgically treated patients had an improved survival compared to non-surgery patients (5-year survival rate: 50.9% vs. 29.6%, p = .017). Among metastatic PGL patients, primary tumour resection was performed in 74 (58.3%) patients and had no significant effect on the survival of metastatic PGL. In sub-analyses, surgery only conferred a survival benefit in patients with primary tumours originated from aortic/carotid bodies, rather than other sites or abdominal tumours.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that primary tumour resection is associated with improved survival in patients with synchronous metastatic PHEO and those with PGL diseases located in aortic/carotid bodies. In addition, PHEO and PGL should be treated as two distinct clinical entities.

Examining Perioperative Risk Associated with Simultaneous Resection of Primary Neuroendocrine Tumors and Synchronous Hepatic Metastases

BACKGROUND

Surgical debulking of primary neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and hepatic resection of metastatic NET disease may each independently improve overall survival. However, evidence for combined primary site debulking and metastasectomy on survival and impact on short-term perioperative outcomes is limited.

METHODS

The 2014-2016 ACS-NSQIP targeted hepatectomy database was queried for all patients undergoing liver resection for metastatic NET. Secondary procedure codes were evaluated for major concurrent operations. Multivariable analysis was performed to determine risk factors for 30-day morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 472 patients were identified, of whom 153 (32.4%) underwent ≥1 additional concurrent major operation. The most common concurrent procedures were small bowel resection (14.6%), partial colectomy (8.9%), and radical lymphadenectomy (7.4%). Among all patients, overall 30-day mortality and morbidity were 1.5% and 25.6%, respectively. Modifiable and treatment-related factors associated with increased major postoperative morbidity risk included >10% weight loss within six months of surgery (p = 0.05), increasing number of hepatic lesions treated (p = 0.05), and biliary reconstruction (p = 0.001). No major concurrent procedure was associated with increased 30-day morbidity (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one-third of patients with stage IV NET underwent combined hepatic and multi-organ resection. Although modifiable and treatment-related factors predictive of perioperative morbidity were identified, performance of concurrent major procedures did not increase perioperative morbidity. These results support consideration of multi-organ resection in carefully selected patients with metastatic NET.

Grade 3 Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors on MDCT: Establishing a Diagnostic Model and Comparing Survival Against Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to establish a diagnostic model for differentiating grade 3 (G3) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) and to analyze survival outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Twenty patients with G3 PNETs and 58 patients with PDACs confirmed by surgery or biopsy were retrospectively included. Demographic and radiologic information was collected. Univariate analyses and binary logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent factors and establish a diagnostic model. An ROC curve was created to determine diagnostic ability. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed. RESULTS. Patients with G3 PNETs were more likely to present with normal carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 levels, normal pancreatic ducts, and round tumors with well-defined margins and higher portal enhancement ratios than were patients with PDAC (p < 0.05). After multivariate analysis, a normal CA 19-9 level (odds ratio, 0.0125; 95% CI, 0.0008-0.2036), round tumor shape (odds ratio, 0.0143; 95% CI, 0.0004-0.5461), and pancreatic duct dilation of 4 mm or less (odds ratio, 17.9804; 95% CI, 1.0098-320.1711) were independent predictors of G3 PNETs. The AUC of the ROC curve was 0.916, and sensitivity and specificity were 90.0% and 81.0%, respectively. Furthermore, patients with G3 PNETs had better overall survival than patients with PDACs. Among patients in the G3 PNET subgroup, patients with liver or lymph node metastases had worse overall survival than patients without metastases. CONCLUSION. A diagnostic model was established to differentiate G3 PNETs from PDACs. A normal CA 19-9 level, round tumor shape, and pancreatic duct dilation of 4 mm or less were factors that were strongly predictive of G3 PNET.

The North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Consensus Paper on the Surgical Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

This manuscript is the result of the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society consensus conference on the surgical management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from July 19 to 20, 2018. The group reviewed a series of questions of specific interest to surgeons taking care of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, and for each, the available literature was reviewed. What follows are these reviews for each question followed by recommendations of the panel.

A prognostic nomogram in patients with distant metastasis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a population-based study

Aim: Prognostic factors in patients with distant metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) remain uncertain. The purpose of our study is to establish a nomogram to predict survival outcomes in patients with metastatic PNETs. Methods: A total of 878 patients diagnosed with PNETs in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database between 2004 and 2016 were retrospectively identified. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with log-rank test was used to analyze survival outcomes. The nomogram was established after a univariate and multivariate Cox analysis. Results: The independent prognostic variables, including age, tumor grade and primary site surgery were applied to develop a nomogram. The original concordance index was 0.773 (95% CI: 0.751-0.795), and the bias-corrected concordance index was 0.769 (95% CI: 0.748-0.791). The internal calibration curves showed well consistency and veracity in predicting cancer-specific survival probabilities. Conclusion: A nomogram was constructed and verified to predict survival outcomes in patients with distant-stage PNETs.

Prognostic and predictive factors on overall survival and surgical outcomes in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: recent advances and controversies

Introduction: Recent advances in diagnostic modalities and therapeutic agents have raised the importance of prognostic factors in predicting overall survival, as well as predictive factors for surgical outcomes, in tailoring therapeutic strategies of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs).Areas covered: Numerous recent studies of panNEN patients report the prognostic values of a number of clinically related factors (clinical, laboratory, imaging, treatment-related factors), pathological factors (histological, classification, grading) and molecular factors on long-term survival. In addition, an increasing number of studies showed the usefulness of various factors, specifically biomarkers and molecular makers, in predicting recurrence and mortality related to surgical treatment. Recent findings (from the last 3 years) in each of these areas, as well as recent controversies, are reviewed.Expert commentary: The clinical importance of prognostic and predictive factors for panNENs is markedly increased for both overall outcome and post resection, as a result of recent advances in all aspects of the diagnosis, management and treatment of panNENs. Despite the proven prognostic utility of routinely used tumor grading/classification and staging systems, further studies are required to establish these novel prognostic factors to support their routine clinical use.