Choice of postoperative radiation for stage IIIA pathologic N2 non-small cell lung cancer: impact of metastatic lymph node number

Prognostic biomarker tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes failed to serve as a predictive biomarker for postoperative radiotherapy in completely resected pN2 non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Evidence suggests that radiotherapy is a potent immunomodulator in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Conversely, it has rarely been demonstrated if immune infiltration can influence radiotherapy efficacy. Herein, we explored the effect of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) on the response to postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in completely resected stage III-pN2 NSCLC.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 244 patients with pathologically confirmed stage III-N2 NSCLC who underwent complete resection at our institution between 2014 and 2020. TILs were assessed with permanent full-face hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) sections and the evaluation of TILs was based on a published guideline. Patients were stratified into the TILlow or TILhigh group with a cutoff value of 50%. Kaplan-Meier method and Log-rank test were utilized to assess disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis were conducted to determine prognostic indicators.

RESULTS

Among 244 patients, a total of 121 patients received PORT whereas 123 did not. TILs level in patients with PORT was significantly higher than that in patients without PORT (p < 0.001). High TILs level was significantly associated with an improved DFS and OS in all the entire chort (DFS, p < 0.001; OS, p = 0.001), PORT chort (DFS, p = 0.003; OS, p = 0.011) and non-PORT chort (DFS, p < 0.001; OS, p = 0.034). There were no significant survival differences between different treatment modalities in the low TILs infiltration (DFS, p = 0.244; OS, p = 0.404) and high TILs infiltration (DFS, p = 0.167; OS, p = 0.958) groups.

CONCLUSIONS

TILs evaluated with H&E sections could represent a prognostic biomarker in patients with completely resected pN2 NSCLC, and high TILs infiltration was associated with favorable survival outcomes.The predictive value of TILs for PORT still need to be further explored in the future.

Impact of pathological nodal staging and tumour differentiation on survival and postoperative radiotherapy in completely resected stage IIIA Non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Tumour differentiation is an important index for adjuvant therapy in many cancers; however, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is an exception. Furthermore, postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) is controversial in patients with NSCLC with N0-1 and N2 disease. We aimed to evaluate the impact of tumour-related factors on overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and distant control (DC) in patients with completely resected stage IIIA NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with stage IIIA non-metastatic NSCLC who underwent complete resection and adjuvant chemotherapy were identified from the Taiwan Cancer Registry (January 2007-December 2017). Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the factors associated with PORT. Survival and relapse outcomes were compared using log-rank tests and Cox regression analysis. Sensitivity analysis was performed using propensity score-matched pairs.

RESULTS

In total, 1,897 patients were included and stratified according to PORT use (PORT vs. non-PORT). After adjusting for covariates, PORT was not found to be associated with improved survival outcomes. In patients with poorly differentiated tumours and N2 disease, absolute benefits for OS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.76), CSS (aHR 0.80), and DC (aHR 0.74) were observed. Multivariable hazard models of propensity score-matched pN2 disease and poorly differentiated tumour subgroups also showed significant survival benefit with PORT treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with poorly differentiated tumours and receiving PORT for pN2 disease showed a lower risk of distant recurrence and more favourable survival outcomes in stage IIIA NSCLC with R0 resection.

Predictive Value of Clinicopathological Factors to Guide Post-Operative Radiotherapy in Completely Resected pN2-Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Introduction: With the evolution of radiotherapy techniques and a better understanding of clinicopathological factors, we aimed to evaluate the treatment effect of post-operative radiotherapy (PORT) and associated predictive factors in patients with completely resected pN2 stage III non-small cell lung cancer (R0 pN2-stage III NSCLC). Material and Method: The cancer registration database of a single medical center was searched for R0 pN2-stage III NSCLC. Clinicopathological factors and information about post-operative therapies, including PORT and adjuvant systemic treatment, were retrospectively collected and analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method and a Cox regression model were applied for time-to-event analysis, with disease-free survival (DFS) being the primary outcome. Results: From 2010 to 2021, 82 R0 pN2-stage III NSCLC patients were evaluated, with 70.1% of tumors harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutations (EGFR mut.). PORT was performed in 73.2% of cases, and the median dose was 54 Gy. After a median follow-up of 42 months, the 3-year DFS and overall survival (OS) rates were 40.6% and 77.3%, respectively. Distant metastasis (DM) was the main failure pattern. In the overall cohort, DFS was improved with PORT (3-year DFS: 44.9% vs. 29.8%; HR: 0.552, p = 0.045). Positive predictive factors for PORT benefit, including EGFR mut., negative extranodal extension, positive lymphovascular invasion, 1-3 positive lymph nodes, and a positive-to-dissected lymph node ratio ≤0.22, were recognized. OS improvement was also observed in subgroups with less lymph node burden. Conclusions: For R0 pN2-stage III NSCLC, PORT prolongs DFS and OS in selected patients. Further studies on predictive factors and the development of nomograms guiding the application of PORT are highly warranted, aiming to enhance the personalization of lung cancer treatment.

Exploring the past, present, and future of postoperative radiotherapy for N2 stage non-small cell lung cancer

Despite conventionally applied postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in pathological N2 (pN2) stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) considering high locoregional recurrence, its survival benefit has been a continuous topic of debate. Although several randomized clinical trials have been conducted, many of them have been withdrawn or analyzed without statistical significance due to slow accrual, making it difficult to determine the efficacy of PORT. Recently, the results of large-scale randomized clinical trials have been published, which showed some improvement in disease-free survival with PORT, but finally had no impact on overall survival. Based on these results, it was expected that the debate over PORT in pN2 patients with NSCLC would come to an end. However, since pN2 patients have different clinicopathologic features, it has become more important to carefully select the patient population who will benefit from PORT. In addition, given the development of systemic treatments such as molecular-targeted therapy and immunotherapy, it is crucial to evaluate whether there is any benefit to PORT in the midst of these recent changes. Therefore, determining the optimal treatment approach for NSCLC pN2 patients remains a complex issue that requires further research and evaluation.

The high-risk features and effect of postoperative radiotherapy on survival for patients with surgically treated stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Although postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) could reduce the incidence of local recurrence in patients with IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the role of PORT on survival in patients with surgically treated stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC remains controversial. Therefore, this study was designed to evaluate the effect of PORT on survival for patients with surgically treated stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study population was chosen from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to determine significant contributors to overall survival (OS) and cancer special survival (CSS) outcomes. To balance baseline characteristics between the non-PORT group and PORT group, propensity score matching (PSM) with 1:1 propensity nearest-neighbor match by 0.001 matching tolerance was conducted by R software. Furthermore, a Kaplan-Meier curve was used to visualize the OS and CSS between the PORT group and non-PORT group survival probability.

RESULTS

Of all evaluated cases, 4511 with IIIA-N2 NSCLC were eligible for inclusion, of which 1920 were enrolled into the PORT group. On univariate analysis and multivariate analysis, sex, age, year of diagnosis, race, histologic type, T stage, PORT, use of chemotherapy, and positive regional nodes were significantly associated with OS and CSS in IIIA-N2 NSCLC (P < 0.05). However, PORT was not significantly associated with OS (univariate HR = 0.92, 95%CI 0.85-0.99, P = 0.02; multivariate HR = 1.01, 95%CI 0.93-1.08, P = 0.91) and CSS (univariate HR = 0.92, 95%CI 0.85-1.01, P = 0.06; multivariate HR = 1.103 95%CI 0.94-1.12, P = 0.56) in IIIA-N2 NSCLC. Meanwhile, after PSM, neither OS nor CSS did differ significantly between the non-PORT group and PORT group (OS HR = 1.08, 95%CI 0.98-1.19, P = 0.12; CSS HR = 1.10, 95%CI 0.99-1.23, P = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

PORT did not contribute to a survival benefit in patients with surgically treated stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC.

The efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

The controversy over the efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) has existed for a long time. The present study reassessed the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) data to investigate whether PORT can improve survival in resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The following databases were used to perform literature search: PubMed, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Embase (from January 1, 1986 to July 5, 2021). The results of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated as hazard ratio (HR). Confidence intervals are chosen with 95% confidence intervals. A total of 12 RCTs and 19 retrospective cohort studies were found to meet the inclusion criteria. A significant DFS improvement was detected in the PORT group (4111 patients from 15 studies), although statistical difference was not detected for OS between the non-PORT and PORT groups (31 studies, 49,342 total patients). PORT prolonged OS in patients undergoing PORT plus postoperative chemotherapy (POCT) and in pN2 patients. Patients with a median radiation dose of 50.4 Gy and a median radiation dose of 54 Gy had a better OS after PORT. However, if the total radiotherapy dose went up to 60 Gy, PORT increased the risk of death in NSCLC patients. Significant difference in OS was not found in the results of studies with regard to treatment methods, pathologic stages, study type, radiation beam quality, and radiation dose. Patients undergoing postoperative chemoradiotherapy and pN2 patients can benefit from PORT. Patients exposed to median radiation doses of 50.4 and 54 Gy demonstrated relatively good efficacy. For patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, PORT has not been proven to extend OS, but its effect on DFS remains strong.

A narrative review of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the principal studies investigating the role of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to discuss the recent major breakthroughs deriving from the Lung ART trial, in order to provide a real-world scenario of the management of resected NSCLC patients.

BACKGROUND

Surgery followed by platinum-based chemotherapy remains the mainstay of adjuvant treatments for completely resected stage II and IIIA NSCLC. Less consistent is the employment of PORT, as no significant benefit was clearly identified from the previous published meta-analysis. Furthermore, the recent results of Lung ART trial questioned for the first time the efficacy of PORT for pathological N2 (pN2) NSCLC patients. Hence, the need to define if PORT still has a role for resected NSCLC and which subgroup of patients could benefit most from this treatment.

METHODS

A literature search of PubMed was performed to identify publications, including prospective and retrospective clinical studies, meta-analysis and systematic review of PORT for NSCLC. No limit concerning years of publication or publication status were applied. Only papers using the English language were selected. The ESMO 2020 and ESMO 2021 online resources were used to analyze the Lung ART trial results. The authors provide a narrative summary of the findings and implications of these studies and how they improve the clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

PORT was considered the standard of care for patients with completely resected pN2 NSCLC based on the results of an old meta-analysis that did not demonstrate a detrimental effect. The more recent randomized phase III Lung ART trial concluded that PORT could not anymore be recommended for pN2 NSCLC as a significant benefit in terms of 3 years disease-free survival (DFS) was not reached and an increased rate of radiotherapy related toxicity was observed. Retrospective studies suggest a possible role of PORT for incompletely resected NSCLC patients and those with an extranodal extension (ENE), but this issue needs to be reinforced from randomized prospective trials. The extensive publication of Lung ART trial is largely awaited to define if there is a role of PORT for resected NSCLC patients.

Postoperative radiotherapy improves survival of patients with ypN2 non-small cell lung cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery - A propensity score matching study of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database

Background

For patients with ypN2 non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery (NCS), the role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) is unclear. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of PORT on survival of ypN2 NSCLC patients after NCS.

Methods

Between 2004 and 2015, patients with ypN2 NSCLC after NCS were filtrated from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the baseline characteristics of the PORT and non‐PORT groups. Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models were adopted to estimate overall survival (OS) and cancer‐specific survival (CSS).

Results

A total of 257 patients who met the criteria were included in the study. After PSM, 115 patients remained in each group. The survival of patients in the PORT group was significantly better than those in the non‐PORT group. Median OS was 36 months vs. 26 months, and 5‐year OS rate was 40.5% vs. 21.0% (p = 0.002). The median CSS was 38 months vs. 27 months, and the 5‐year CSS rate was 43.7% vs. 22.1% (p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that PORT was an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.43–0.82, p = 0.001) and CSS (HR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.41–0.78, p = 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that patients in the following subgroups could benefit from PORT: age ≤ 70, diagnosed in the later period (2010–2015), white race, squamous cell carcinoma, grade III–IV, lobectomy, stage T3‐4, or with positive regional nodes ≤3 or > 3.

Conclusions

For patients with ypN2 NSCLC after NCS, PORT significantly improves OS and CSS. These results need to be confirmed by further randomized studies.

Automatic segmentation of organs at risk and tumors in CT images of lung cancer from partially labelled datasets with a semi-supervised conditional nnU-Net

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Accurately and reliably defining organs at risk (OARs) and tumors are the cornerstone of radiation therapy (RT) treatment planning for lung cancer. Almost all segmentation networks based on deep learning techniques rely on fully annotated data with strong supervision. However, existing public imaging datasets encountered in the RT domain frequently include singly labelled tumors or partially labelled organs because annotating full OARs and tumors in CT images is both rigorous and tedious. To utilize labelled data from different sources, we proposed a dual-path semi-supervised conditional nnU-Net for OARs and tumor segmentation that is trained on a union of partially labelled datasets.

METHODS

The framework employs the nnU-Net as the base model and introduces a conditioning strategy by incorporating auxiliary information as an additional input layer into the decoder. The conditional nnU-Net efficiently leverages prior conditional information to classify the target class at the pixelwise level. Specifically, we employ the uncertainty-aware mean teacher (UA-MT) framework to assist in OARs segmentation, which can effectively leverage unlabelled data (images from a tumor labelled dataset) by encouraging consistent predictions of the same input under different perturbations. Furthermore, we individually design different combinations of loss functions to optimize the segmentation of OARs (Dice loss and cross-entropy loss) and tumors (Dice loss and focal loss) in a dual path.

RESULTS

The proposed method is evaluated on two publicly available datasets of the spinal cord, left and right lung, heart, esophagus, and lung tumor, in which satisfactory segmentation performance has been achieved in term of both the region-based Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and the boundary-based Hausdorff distance (HD).

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed semi-supervised conditional nnU-Net breaks down the barriers between nonoverlapping labelled datasets and further alleviates the problem of "data hunger" and "data waste" in multi-class segmentation. The method has the potential to help radiologists with RT treatment planning in clinical practice.

Role of Postoperative Radiotherapy in the Management for Resected NSCLC - Decision Criteria in Clinical Routine Pre- and Post-LungART

BACKGROUND

The role of postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) in stage III N2 NSCLC is controversial. We analyzed decision-making for PORT among European radiation oncology experts in lung cancer.

METHODS

Twenty-two experts were asked before and after presentation of the results of the LungART trial to describe their decision criteria for PORT in the management of pN+ NSCLC patients. Treatment strategies were subsequently converted into decision trees and analyzed.

RESULTS

Following decision criteria were identified: extracapsular nodal extension, incomplete lymph node resection, multistation lymph nodes, high nodal tumor load, poor response to induction chemotherapy, ineligibility to receive adjuvant chemotherapy, performance status, resection margin, lung function and cardiopulmonary comorbidities. The LungART results had impact on decision-making and reduced the number of recommendations for PORT. The only clear indication for PORT was a R1/2 resection. Six experts out of ten who initially recommended PORT for all R0 resected pN2 patients no longer used PORT routinely for these patients, while four still recommended PORT for all patients with pN2. Fourteen experts used PORT only for patients with risk factors, compared to eleven before the presentation of the LungART trial. Four experts stated that PORT was never recommended in R0 resected pN2 patients regardless of risk factors.

CONCLUSION

After presentation of the LungART trial results at ESMO 2020, 82% of our experts still used PORT for stage III pN2 NSCLC patients with risk factors. The recommendation for PORT decreased, especially for patients without risk factors. Cardiopulmonary comorbidities became more relevant in the decision-making for PORT.

Postoperative radiotherapy for patients with completely resected pathological stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer: a preferential benefit for squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The beneficial effect of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) on completely resected pathological IIIA-N2 (pIIIA-N2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been a subject of interest with controversy. The aim of the study was to distinguish the clinical efficacy of PORT on lung adenocarcinoma (LADC) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) among pIIIA-N2 NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between October 2010 and September 2016, 288 consecutive patients with completely resected pIIIA-N2 NSCLC at Beijing Chest Hospital were retrospectively analyzed, which consisted of 194 cases of LADC and 85 cases of LSCC. There were 42 (21.6%) patients treated with PORT in LADC cases and 19 (22.3%) patients treated with PORT in LSCC cases. The 5-year overall survival (OS), loco-regional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The prognostic factors were determined using Cox's regression model.

RESULTS

Among 194 cases of LADC, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS in the PORT group were 95.2%, 61.9% and 40.0%, respectively, while in the non-PORT group were 90.1%, 63.3% and 45.0% (p = 0.948). The use of postoperative chemotherapy (POCT) and smoking index ≥ 400 were both prognostic factors of 5-year rates of OS, LRFS and DMFS. On the other hand, among 85 cases of LSCC, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS in the PORT group were 94.7%, 63.2% and 63.2%, respectively, whereas in the non-PORT group were 86.4%, 48.5% and 37.1% (p = 0.026). In this group, only the use of PORT was a favorable prognostic factor for 5-year OS, LRFS and DMFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to clinicopathological differences among completely resected pIIIA-N2 NSCLC, PORT may not be suitable to all patients. Our study distinguishes pIIIA-N2 LSCC from LADC by their positive responses to PORT.

A biomarker-based prediction model for risk of locoregional recurrence in pathologic stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

To investigate risk factors for locoregional recurrence (LRR) of pathologic stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (pIIIA-N2 NSCLC) and construct a prediction model for risk score to determine a patient's risk for LRR and guide the selection of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT).

METHODS

The clinical, pathologic, and biological data of 107 patients with pIIIA-N2 NSCLC treated at Fujian Provincial Hospital between May 2012 and December 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. None of the patients had positive surgical margins, and none received preoperative treatment or PORT. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for a univariate analysis of possible factors for locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS). The Cox regression model was used in a multivariate analysis to identify independent risk factors for LRFS, which were used to construct a prediction model for risk score. The concordance index was calculated to evaluate discrimination.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 31.2 months. During the follow-up, 69 (64.5%) patients had LRR and/or distant metastasis (DM). Among them, 46 (43%) patients had LRR (with or without DM), and 56 (52.3%) patients had DM (with or without LRR). The 1-year LRFS, distant metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival rates were 78.2%, 78%, 69.8%, and 90.2%, respectively; the 3-year rates were 50.6%, 41.2%, 31.2%, and 66.3%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that surgical approach (hazard ratio [HR], 0.348; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.175-0.693; P = 0.003), metastatic N2 lymph node ratio (HR, 3.597; 95% CI, 1.832-7.062; P = 0.000), epidermal growth factor receptor status (HR, 3.666; 95% CI, 1.724-7.797; P = 0.001), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (HR, 2.364; 95% CI, 1.221-4.574; P = 0.011) were independent risk factors for LRFS. These independent risk factors were used to construct a prediction model for risk score and stratify patients into the low-risk group (risk score: 0-2), medium-risk group (risk score: 3-5), and high-risk group (risk score: 6-13). The 1-year LRFS rates of these groups were 91.9%, 85.3%, and 54.6%, respectively; the 3-year LRFS rates were 71.4%, 57.3%, and 13.6%, respectively. These between-group differences were significant (P = 0.000). The prediction model showed good discrimination (concordance index = 0.747, 95% CI, 0.678-0.816).

CONCLUSION

Our prediction model for risk score based on characteristics of pIIIA-N2 NSCLC patients may help clinicians predict a patient's risk for LRR. Further investigations of PORT with patients in different risk groups are warranted.

Micropapillary pattern of stage IIIA-N2 lung adenocarcinoma is a prognostic factor after adjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Aim: This study aims to investigate the significance of a micropapillary pattern in stage IIIA-N₂ lung adenocarcinoma after adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Patients & methods: A total of 257 patients with stage IIIA-N₂ lung adenocarcinoma were enrolled in this study. Patients were classified into three groups based on the proportion of micropapillary components: micropapillary negative, micropapillary minor component and micropapillary predominant component. Results: The micropapillary predominant group had the shortest median disease-free survival and overall survival times compared with the micropapillary minor component and micropapillary negative groups (median overall survival time: 54 months vs 64 months vs not reached; p = 0.004). Furthermore, the micropapillary pattern was an independent prognostic factor for disease-free survival and overall survival (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The micropapillary pattern of IIIA-N₂ lung adenocarcinoma is related to worse prognosis.

The impact of order with radiation therapy in stage IIIA pathologic N2 NSCLC patients: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the optimal order of radiation therapy in patients affected by stage IIIA pathologic N2 (IIIA/N2) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to identify its potential risk factors.

METHODS

17,654 (8786 men and 8868 women) diagnosed with NSCLC stage IIIA-N2 from 2004 to 2015 patients were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Among the relevant clinical parameters, we evaluated overall survival (OS), lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) and other variables such as age, sex and tumor size in patients who were treated with different combinations of surgery and radiotherapy strategies.

RESULTS

We discovered that surgery benefit in younger IIIA/N2 NSCLC patients (age ≤ 75), and compared with surgery only, preoperative radiotherapy significantly improved the survival rate most (p < 0.001). When we performed the OS and LCSS analysis in the subgroup of patients' age > 75 years old, who underwent postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) had the highest survival rate (p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses showed that the following parameters had a negative impact on survival: female sex, older age, no chemotherapy, large tumor size, high tumor grade, no surgery or radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In IIIA/N2 NSCLC patients, surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy were associated with improved OS and LCSS. Younger patients underwent surgical resection and chemotherapy, the main population we studied, benefited most from preoperative radiotherapy in all orders with radiation therapy (p < 0.001). In patients more than 75 years old, there was no clear benefit from only surgery, and PORT was recommended in case of having surgery.

Comparison between atlas and convolutional neural network based automatic segmentation of multiple organs at risk in non-small cell lung cancer

Delineation of organs at risk (OARs) is important but time consuming for radiotherapy planning. Automatic segmentation of OARs based on convolutional neural network (CNN) has been established for lung cancer patients at our institution. The aim of this study is to compare automatic segmentation based on CNN (AS-CNN) with automatic segmentation based on atlas (AS-Atlas) in terms of the efficiency and accuracy of OARs contouring.The OARs, including the lungs, esophagus, heart, liver, and spinal cord, of 19 non-small cell lung cancer patients were delineated using three methods: AS-CNN, AS-Atlas in the Pinnacle-software, and manual delineation (MD) by a senior radiation oncologist. MD was used as the ground-truth reference, and the segmentation efficiency was evaluated by the time spent per patient. The accuracy was evaluated using the Mean surface distance (MSD) and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). The paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare these indexes between the 2 automatic segmentation models.In the 19 testing cases, both AS-CNN and AS-Atlas saved substantial time compared with MD. AS-CNN was more efficient than AS-Atlas (1.6 min vs 2.4 min, P < .001). In terms of the accuracy, AS-CNN performed well in the esophagus, with a DSC of 73.2%. AS-CNN was better than AS-Atlas in segmenting the left lung (DSC: 94.8% vs 93.2%, P = .01; MSD: 1.10 cm vs 1.73 cm, P < .001) and heart (DSC: 89.3% vs 85.8%, P = .05; MSD: 1.65 cm vs 3.66 cm, P < .001). Furthermore, AS-CNN exhibited superior performance in segmenting the liver (DSC: 93.7% vs 93.6%, P = .81; MSD: 2.03 cm VS 2.11 cm, P = .66). The results obtained from AS-CNN and AS-Atlas were similar in segmenting the right lung. However, the performance of AS-CNN in the spinal cord was inferior to that of AS-Atlas (DSC: 82.1% vs 86.8%, P = .01; MSD: 0.87 cm vs 0.66 cm, P = .01).Our study demonstrated that AS-CNN significantly reduced the contouring time and outperformed AS-Atlas in most cases. AS-CNN can potentially be used for OARs segmentation in patients with pathological N2 (pN2) non-small cell lung cancer.

The Role of Postoperative Radiation Therapy for pN2 Non-small-cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

The role for postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with mediastinal lymph node (LN) involvement (pN2 disease) is controversial. We compared surgery alone with PORT among patients with pN2 NSCLC. We then performed subset analyses to better delineate patients that might benefit from PORT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a propensity score (PS)-matched, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) analysis of patients with pN2 disease from 1989 to 2016 with surgery alone or PORT. Multiple imputation with chained equations was used for missing LN data.

RESULTS

A total of 8631 patients were included in this analysis; 4579 underwent surgery alone, and 4052 underwent PORT. Following PS matching and IPTW, there was no difference in overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.99; P = .76). However, PORT improved OS among a subset of patients with a LN positive to sampled ratio ≥ 50% (HR, 0.90; P = .01). Moreover, there was a trend towards improved OS among this subset, even with chemotherapy (HR, 0.91; P = .09).

CONCLUSION

PORT is not associated with an improvement or detriment in OS for all patients with pN2 NSCLC. However, patients with a positive to sampled LN ratio ≥ 50% may benefit, regardless of chemotherapy status. Nevertheless, PORT will remain the standard of care as we await the results of the ongoing LUNG ART trial.

Resectable IIIA-N2 Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): In Search for the Proper Treatment

Locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer accounts for one third of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at the time of initial diagnosis and presents with a wide range of clinical and pathological heterogeneity. To date, the combined multimodality approach involving both local and systemic control is the gold standard for these patients, since occult distant micrometastatic disease should always be suspected. With the rapid increase in treatment options, the need for an interdisciplinary discussion involving oncologists, surgeons, radiation oncologists and radiologists has become essential. Surgery should be recommended to patients with non-bulky, discrete, or single-level N2 involvement and be included in the multimodality treatment. Resectable stage IIIA patients have been the subject of a number of clinical trials and retrospective analysis, discussing the efficiency and survival benefits on patients treated with the available therapeutic approaches. However, most of them have some limitations due to their retrospective nature, lack of exact pretreatment staging, and the involvement of heterogeneous populations leading to the awareness that each patient should undergo a tailored therapy in light of the nature of his tumor, its extension and his performance status.

Postoperative intensity-modulated radiation therapy reduces local recurrence and improves overall survival in III-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer: A single-center, retrospective study

Purpose

To determine the postoperative effects of radiotherapy (PORT) on the local recurrence‐free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS) of stage III‐N2 non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Materials and Methods

183 patients with resected stage III‐pN2 NSCLC from Hunan Cancer Hospital between 2013 and 2016 were divided into two groups for postoperative chemotherapy (POCT) (n = 105) or combination chemotherapy and radiotherapy (POCRT) (n = 78). The LRFS and OS were compared and the factors affecting local recurrence were illustrated in these two groups. The sites of failure based on the lobe of the primary tumor in two groups were described.

Results

PORT leads to a strikingly lower risk for local recurrence and brought superior OS benefit. For different pN2 Subclassification, Patients with multiple‐station pN2 ± pN1 disease had the worst LRFS (11 months) and single‐station pN2 + multiple station pN1 disease had a relatively short LRFS (24 months) in group POCT. Short LRFS is correlated with multiple‐station pN2, older age (Y > 55), patients with a high positive LN ratio > 1/3 and a poor tumor histological differentiation degree. In group POCT, the most frequent failure site occurs at the ipsilateral hilum (21.0%), the bronchial stump (20.0%), followed by LNs4R (19.0%), LNs4L (18.1%), LNs7 (15.2%), most of left‐sided tumors more frequently involved the contralateral mediastinum, whereas the ipsilateral recurrences dominated for right‐sided tumors, especially for LNs4R. In group POCRT, the highest failure site was the bronchial stump (11.5%), followed by LNs4L (8.97%), LNs1 (7.69%), the ipsilateral hilum (6.41%) and LNs4R (6.41%).

Conclusion

PORT remarkably reduced local recurrence and improved OS in stage III‐pN2 NSCLC, especially in the multiple‐station pN2 group.

The role of postoperative radiotherapy for completely resected pIIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer patients with different clinicopathological features: a systemic review and meta-analysis

Background: The role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in completely resected pathological stage IIIA-N2 (pIIIA-N2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effect of PORT in patients with pIIIA-N2 NSCLC on the basis of clinicopathological features. Methods: The PubMed, PubMed Central (PMC), Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), which were compared using the hazard ratio (HR). Results: One randomized trial and 12 retrospective studies were eligible for the analysis. PORT significantly improved both OS [HR = 0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.79-0.92] and DFS (HR = 0.57; 95% CI: 0.38-0.85) compared with non-PORT treatment in patients with multiple N2 metastases or multiple N2 station involvement. No significant difference in either OS (HR = 1.03; 95% CI: 0.86-1.24) or DFS (HR = 1.08; 95% CI: 0.70-1.65) was found between PORT and non-PORT groups for patients with single N2 station involvement. No significant heterogeneity was observed. No significant differences in OS were observed between PORT and non-PORT groups for patients of different ages, sex, tumor sizes or pT stages, and histological types. Conclusions: The findings of this meta-analysis supported a role for PORT in patients with completely resected pIIIA-N2 NSCLC having multiple N2 metastases and favored withholding PORT to patients with single N2 station involvement. Further prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the findings.

PLNR≤20% may be a benefit from PORT for patients with IIIA-N2 NSCLC: a large population-based study

Purpose

Our study was to evaluate the influence of positive lymph nodes ratio (PLNR) on survival for patients with pathological stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after receiving postoperative radiotherapy (PORT).

Patients and methods

The chi-squared test was used to compare the patient baseline characteristics. Cox proportional hazard model was used to analyze the influence of different variables on overall survival (OS). X-tile model was applied to determine the cutoff values of PLNR. Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test were used to compare survival differences. Based on different cutoff values of PLNR, Cox proportional hazard model was also used to analyze the influence factors on OS.

Results

Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that PLNR (P=0.001) and PORT (HR=1.283; 95% CI 1.154–1.426; P<0.001) were significant independent prognostic factors for OS in patients with resected IIIA-N2 NSCLC. The X-tile model was used to screen three different cutoff values including PLNR≤20%, 20%<PLNR≤40%, PLNR>40%. Based on these different cutoff values, we found that patients with PLNR≤20% receiving PORT have a better OS (P=0.007). Further multivariable analysis showed that PORT is an independent prognostic factor of OS only for patients with PLNR≤20% (HR=1.328; 95% CI 1.139–1.549; P<0.001). Conclusion: PLNR≤20% may be a prognostic factor for patients with IIIA-N2 NSCLC receiving PORT.

Male patients with resected IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer may benefit from postoperative radiotherapy: a population-based survival analysis

AIM

Our analysis was performed to assess the efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) on the survival for pathologic IIIA-N2 Non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

PATIENTS & METHODS

We identified 2949 patients from 2004 to 2013 in the SEER database. Propensity score-matching was used to reduce the selection bias. Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and the factors associated with survival prognosis were evaluated.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in OS and CSS between PORT and non-PORT groups. However, subgroup analysis revealed an OS (p = 0.007) and CSS (p = 0.006) detrimental for male patients not receiving PORT. Multivariate analysis showed that old age, male sex, high pathologic grade, squamous carcinoma, bigger tumor size and larger number of positive lymph nodes had a negative impact on survival.

CONCLUSION

PORT could improve OS and CSS in male patients with resected IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer.