1
|
Guo Y, Liu Z, Feng S, Cai H, Zhang Q. Clinical Viability of an Active Spot Scanning Beam Delivery System With a Newly Developed Carbon-Ion Treatment Planning System. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101503. [PMID: 38883996 PMCID: PMC11177064 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Although active spot scanning irradiation technique is theoretically superior to passive-scattered broad beam irradiation with respect to normal tissue sparing, corroborations of the clinical benefit of carbon-ion spot scanning have remained scarce. This study aims to investigate the feasibility and clinical implementation of an active spot scanning beam calculation algorithm in a homemade carbon-ion treatment planning system by comparing it with a conventional passive uniform scanning technique. Methods and Materials Carbon-ion plans were initially formulated using spot/uniform scanning methods in 22 participants enrolled in a prospective observational clinical trial. Subsequently, 2 additional plans were designed, resulting in 3 carbon-ion plans for each participant: uniform and spot scanning with miniridge filters of 2 mm and 4 mm, respectively. Results The findings revealed no significant differences in dose homogeneity; however, significant differences in dose conformity were found between the active and passive scanning plans. For dose drop-off outside the target volume, the average gradient index values were 1.94 (95% CI, 1.79%-2.09%), 1.87 (95% CI, 1.73%-2.01%), and 3.20 (95% CI, 2.80%-3.61%) for the miniridge filters of 2 mm and 4 mm, and uniform scanning plans, respectively. The pretreatment tumor volume was 124.7 cm3 (range, 54.2-234 cm3), and the average shrinkage observed was 38.4% (95% CI, 17.6%-59.4%). Seven participants experienced grade 1 acute toxicity, and 4 experienced grade 2 acute toxicity. However, none of the patients developed grade 3 acute toxicity. Conclusions Increasing evidence suggests that potential clinical advantages of spot scanning delivery underlie its technical characteristics. As one among the few institutions currently using carbon-ion radiation therapy, the investigation also provides promising safety and efficacy outcomes from the initial groups of treated participants, thereby contributing to the established clinical evidence supporting the effectiveness and superiority of carbon-ion therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yixiao Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, P.R. China
| | - Zhiqiang Liu
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu, P.R. China
| | - Shifang Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, P.R. China
| | - Hongyi Cai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, P.R. China
| | - Qiuning Zhang
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sasaki M, Tamamura H, Tameshige Y, Azuma Y, Maeda Y, Matsushita K, Sato Y, Takamatsu S, Inoue K, Tabata Y, Yoshimura H, Yamamoto K. Dose Evaluation in 2-Phase Method for Advanced Esophageal Cancer by Hybrid Irradiation Techniques. Int J Part Ther 2024; 11:100010. [PMID: 38764603 PMCID: PMC11098852 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpt.2024.100010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Revised: 12/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose In concurrent chemoradiotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer, a 2-phase method consisting of initial irradiation of a wide elective nodal region and boost irradiation of the primary lesion is commonly employed. Although dose escalation to the primary lesion may be required to achieve higher local control rates, the radiation dose to critical organs must not exceed dose constraints. To achieve an optimum balance of dose prescription and dose reduction to surrounding organs, such as the lungs and heart, we compared hybrid dose distributions and investigated the best combination of the following recent irradiation techniques: volumetric modulation arc therapy (VMAT), proton broad-beam irradiation, and intensity-modulated proton beam therapy (IMPT). Materials and Methods Forty-five patients with advanced esophageal cancer whose primary lesions were located in the middle- or lower-thoracic region were studied. Radiotherapy plans for the initial and boost irradiation in the 2-phase method were calculated using VMAT, proton broad-beam irradiation, and IMPT calculation codes, and the dose-volume histogram indices of the lungs and heart for the accumulated plans were compared. Results In plans using boost proton irradiation with a prescribed dose of 60 Gy(RBE), all dose-volume histogram indices were significantly below the tolerance limits. Initial and boost irradiation with VMAT resulted in the median dose of V30 Gy(RBE)(heart) of 27.4% and an achievement rate below the tolerance limit of 57.8% (26 cases). In simulations of dose escalation up to 70 Gy(RBE), initial and boost IMPT resulted in the highest achievement rate, satisfying all dose constraints in 95.6% (43 cases). Conclusion Applying VMAT to both initial and boost irradiation is not recommended because of the increased risk of the cardiac dose exceeding the tolerance limit. IMPT may allow dose escalation of up to 70 Gy(RBE) without radiation risks to the lungs and heart in the treatment of advanced esophageal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Makoto Sasaki
- Proton Therapy Center, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Fukui, Japan
| | | | - Yuji Tameshige
- Proton Therapy Center, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Fukui, Japan
| | - Yuya Azuma
- Kouseikai Proton Therapy Center, Nara, Japan
| | - Yoshikazu Maeda
- Proton Therapy Center, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Fukui, Japan
| | | | - Yoshitaka Sato
- Proton Therapy Center, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Fukui, Japan
| | - Shigeyuki Takamatsu
- Department of Radiology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Ishikawa, Japan
| | | | - Yoji Tabata
- Kouseikai Proton Therapy Center, Nara, Japan
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yi B, Jatczak J, Deng W, Poirier YP, Yao W, Witek ME, Molitoris JK, Zakhary MJ, Zhang B, Biswal NC, Ferris MJ, Mossahebi S. Is noncoplanar plan more robust to inter-fractional variations than coplanar plan in treating bilateral HN tumors with pencil-beam scanning proton beams? J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14186. [PMID: 37974385 PMCID: PMC10860533 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Noncoplanar plans (NCPs) are commonly used for proton treatment of bilateral head and neck (HN) malignancies. NCP requires additional verification setup imaging between beams to correct residual errors of robotic couch motion, which increases imaging dose and total treatment time. This study compared the quality and robustness of NCPs with those of coplanar plans (CPs). METHODS AND MATERIALS Under an IRB-approved study, CPs were created retrospectively for 10 bilateral HN patients previously treated with NCPs maintaining identical beam geometry of the original plan but excluding couch rotations. Plan robustness to the inter-fractional variation (IV) of both plans was evaluated through the Dose Volume Histograms (DVH) of weekly quality assurance CT (QACT) sets (39 total). In addition, delivery efficiency for both plans was compared using total treatment time (TTT) and beam-on time (BOT). RESULTS No significant differences in plan quality were observed in terms of clinical target volume (CTV) coverage (D95) or organ-at-risk (OAR) doses (p > 0.4 for all CTVs and OARs). No significant advantage of NCPs in the robustness to IV was found over CP, either. Changes in D95 of QA plans showed a linear correlation (slope = 1.006, R2 > 0.99) between NCP and CP for three CTV data points (CTV1, CTV2, and CTV3) in each QA plan (117 data points for 39 QA plans). NCPs showed significantly higher beam delivery time than CPs for TTT (539 ± 50 vs. 897 ± 142 s; p < 0.001); however, no significant differences were observed for BOT. CONCLUSION NCPs are not more robust to IV than CPs when treating bilateral HN tumors with pencil-beam scanning proton beams. CPs showed plan quality and robustness similar to NCPs while reduced treatment time (∼6 min). This suggests that CPs may be a more efficient planning technique for bilateral HN cancer proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- ByongYong Yi
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Maryland School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
- Maryland Proton Treatment CenterBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Jenna Jatczak
- Maryland Proton Treatment CenterBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Wei Deng
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Maryland School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
- Maryland Proton Treatment CenterBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Yannick P. Poirier
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Maryland School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
- Maryland Proton Treatment CenterBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Weiguang Yao
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Maryland School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
- Maryland Proton Treatment CenterBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Matthew E. Witek
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Maryland School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
- Maryland Proton Treatment CenterBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Jason K. Molitoris
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Maryland School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
- Maryland Proton Treatment CenterBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Mark J. Zakhary
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Maryland School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
- Maryland Proton Treatment CenterBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Baoshe Zhang
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Maryland School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
- Maryland Proton Treatment CenterBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Nrusingh C. Biswal
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Maryland School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
- Maryland Proton Treatment CenterBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Matthew J. Ferris
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Maryland School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
- Maryland Proton Treatment CenterBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Sina Mossahebi
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Maryland School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
- Maryland Proton Treatment CenterBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pennock M, Wei S, Cheng C, Lin H, Hasan S, Chhabra AM, Choi JI, Bakst RL, Kabarriti R, Simone II CB, Lee NY, Kang M, Press RH. Proton Bragg Peak FLASH Enables Organ Sparing and Ultra-High Dose-Rate Delivery: Proof of Principle in Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3828. [PMID: 37568644 PMCID: PMC10417542 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Revised: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Proton pencil-beam scanning (PBS) Bragg peak FLASH combines ultra-high dose rate delivery and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing. This proof-of-principle study compared dosimetry and dose rate coverage between PBS Bragg peak FLASH and PBS transmission FLASH in head and neck reirradiation. PBS Bragg peak FLASH plans were created via the highest beam single energy, range shifter, and range compensator, and were compared to PBS transmission FLASH plans for 6 GyE/fraction and 10 GyE/fraction in eight recurrent head and neck patients originally treated with quad shot reirradiation (14.8/3.7 CGE). The 6 GyE/fraction and 10 GyE/fraction plans were also created using conventional-rate intensity-modulated proton therapy techniques. PBS Bragg peak FLASH, PBS transmission FLASH, and conventional plans were compared for OAR sparing, FLASH dose rate coverage, and target coverage. All FLASH OAR V40 Gy/s dose rate coverage was 90-100% at 6 GyE and 10 GyE for both FLASH modalities. PBS Bragg peak FLASH generated dose volume histograms (DVHs) like those of conventional therapy and demonstrated improved OAR dose sparing over PBS transmission FLASH. All the modalities had similar CTV coverage. PBS Bragg peak FLASH can deliver conformal, ultra-high dose rate FLASH with a two-millisecond delivery of the minimum MU per spot. PBS Bragg peak FLASH demonstrated similar dose rate coverage to PBS transmission FLASH with improved OAR dose-sparing, which was more pronounced in the 10 GyE/fraction than in the 6 GyE/fraction. This feasibility study generates hypotheses for the benefits of FLASH in head and neck reirradiation and developing biological models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Pennock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY 10461, USA;
| | - Shouyi Wei
- Department of Physics, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (S.W.); (H.L.); (S.H.); (M.K.)
| | - Chingyun Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA;
| | - Haibo Lin
- Department of Physics, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (S.W.); (H.L.); (S.H.); (M.K.)
| | - Shaakir Hasan
- Department of Physics, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (S.W.); (H.L.); (S.H.); (M.K.)
| | - Arpit M. Chhabra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (A.M.C.); (J.I.C.); (C.B.S.II)
| | - J. Isabelle Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (A.M.C.); (J.I.C.); (C.B.S.II)
| | - Richard L. Bakst
- Department of Radiation Oncology—Radiation Oncology Associates, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA;
| | - Rafi Kabarriti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY 10461, USA;
| | - Charles B. Simone II
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (A.M.C.); (J.I.C.); (C.B.S.II)
| | - Nancy Y. Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Minglei Kang
- Department of Physics, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (S.W.); (H.L.); (S.H.); (M.K.)
| | - Robert H. Press
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL 33176, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hrinivich WT, Li H, Tran A, Acharya S, Ladra MM, Sheikh K. Clinical Characterization of a Table Mounted Range Shifter Board for Synchrotron-Based Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Pediatric Craniospinal Irradiation. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15112882. [PMID: 37296845 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15112882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 05/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To report our design, manufacturing, commissioning and initial clinical experience with a table-mounted range shifter board (RSB) intended to replace the machine-mounted range shifter (MRS) in a synchrotron-based pencil beam scanning (PBS) system to reduce penumbra and normal tissue dose for image-guided pediatric craniospinal irradiation (CSI). Methods: A custom RSB was designed and manufactured from a 3.5 cm thick slab of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) to be placed directly under patients, on top of our existing couch top. The relative linear stopping power (RLSP) of the RSB was measured using a multi-layer ionization chamber, and output constancy was measured using an ion chamber. End-to-end tests were performed using the MRS and RSB approaches using an anthropomorphic phantom and radiochromic film measurements. Cone beam CT (CBCT) and 2D planar kV X-ray image quality were compared with and without the RSB present using image quality phantoms. CSI plans were produced using MRS and RSB approaches for two retrospective pediatric patients, and the resultant normal tissue doses were compared. Results: The RLSP of the RSB was found to be 1.163 and provided computed penumbra of 6.9 mm in the phantom compared to 11.8 mm using the MRS. Phantom measurements using the RSB demonstrated errors in output constancy, range, and penumbra of 0.3%, -0.8%, and 0.6 mm, respectively. The RSB reduced mean kidney and lung dose compared to the MRS by 57.7% and 46.3%, respectively. The RSB decreased mean CBCT image intensities by 86.8 HU but did not significantly impact CBCT or kV spatial resolution providing acceptable image quality for patient setup. Conclusions: A custom RSB for pediatric proton CSI was designed, manufactured, modeled in our TPS, and found to significantly reduce lateral proton beam penumbra compared to a standard MRS while maintaining CBCT and kV image-quality and is in routine use at our center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William T Hrinivich
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
- The Johns Hopkins Proton Therapy Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20016, USA
| | - Heng Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
- The Johns Hopkins Proton Therapy Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20016, USA
| | - Anh Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
- The Johns Hopkins Proton Therapy Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20016, USA
| | - Sahaja Acharya
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
- The Johns Hopkins Proton Therapy Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20016, USA
| | - Matthew M Ladra
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
- The Johns Hopkins Proton Therapy Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20016, USA
| | - Khadija Sheikh
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
- The Johns Hopkins Proton Therapy Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20016, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Russ E, Davis CM, Slaven JE, Bradfield DT, Selwyn RG, Day RM. Comparison of the Medical Uses and Cellular Effects of High and Low Linear Energy Transfer Radiation. TOXICS 2022; 10:toxics10100628. [PMID: 36287908 PMCID: PMC9609561 DOI: 10.3390/toxics10100628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Revised: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
Exposure to ionizing radiation can occur during medical treatments, from naturally occurring sources in the environment, or as the result of a nuclear accident or thermonuclear war. The severity of cellular damage from ionizing radiation exposure is dependent upon a number of factors including the absorbed radiation dose of the exposure (energy absorbed per unit mass of the exposure), dose rate, area and volume of tissue exposed, type of radiation (e.g., X-rays, high-energy gamma rays, protons, or neutrons) and linear energy transfer. While the dose, the dose rate, and dose distribution in tissue are aspects of a radiation exposure that can be varied experimentally or in medical treatments, the LET and eV are inherent characteristics of the type of radiation. High-LET radiation deposits a higher concentration of energy in a shorter distance when traversing tissue compared with low-LET radiation. The different biological effects of high and low LET with similar energies have been documented in vivo in animal models and in cultured cells. High-LET results in intense macromolecular damage and more cell death. Findings indicate that while both low- and high-LET radiation activate non-homologous end-joining DNA repair activity, efficient repair of high-LET radiation requires the homologous recombination repair pathway. Low- and high-LET radiation activate p53 transcription factor activity in most cells, but high LET activates NF-kB transcription factor at lower radiation doses than low-LET radiation. Here we review the development, uses, and current understanding of the cellular effects of low- and high-LET radiation exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Russ
- Graduate Program of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Catherine M. Davis
- Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Therapeutics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - John E. Slaven
- Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Therapeutics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Dmitry T. Bradfield
- Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Therapeutics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Reed G. Selwyn
- Department of Radiology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
| | - Regina M. Day
- Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Therapeutics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Oonsiri P, Nantavithya C, Lertbutsayanukul C, Sarsitthithum T, Vimolnoch M, Tawonwong T, Saksornchai K. Dosimetric evaluation of photons versus protons in postmastectomy planning for ultrahypofractionated breast radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:20. [PMID: 35093111 PMCID: PMC8799967 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-01992-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Ultrahypofractionation can shorten the irradiation period. This study is the first dosimetric investigation comparing ultrahypofractionation using volumetric arc radiation therapy (VMAT) and intensity-modulated proton radiation therapy (IMPT) techniques in postmastectomy treatment planning.
Materials and methods
Twenty postmastectomy patients (10-left and 10-right sided) were replanned with both VMAT and IMPT techniques. There were four scenarios: left chest wall, left chest wall including regional nodes, right chest wall, and right chest wall including regional nodes. The prescribed dose was 26 Gy(RBE) in 5 fractions. For VMAT, a 1-cm bolus was added for 2 in 5 fractions. For IMPT, robust optimization was performed on the CTV structure with a 3-mm setup uncertainty and a 3.5% range uncertainty. This study aimed to compare the dosimetric parameters of the PTV, ipsilateral lung, contralateral lung, heart, skin, esophageal, and thyroid doses.
Results
The PTV-D95 was kept above 24.7 Gy(RBE) in both VMAT and IMPT plans. The ipsilateral lung mean dose of the IMPT plans was comparable to that of the VMAT plans. In three of four scenarios, the V5 of the ipsilateral lung in IMPT plans was lower than in VMAT plans. The Dmean and V5 of heart dose were reduced by a factor of 4 in the IMPT plans of the left side. For the right side, the Dmean of the heart was less than 1 Gy(RBE) for IMPT, while the VMAT delivered approximately 3 Gy(RBE). The IMPT plans showed a significantly higher skin dose owing to the lack of a skin-sparing effect in the proton beam. The IMPT plans provided lower esophageal and thyroid mean dose.
Conclusion
Despite the higher skin dose with the proton plan, IMPT significantly reduced the dose to adjacent organs at risk, which might translate into the reduction of late toxicities when compared with the photon plan.
Collapse
|