All-arthroscopic repair of Atzei class II and III triangular fibrocartilage complex tears using the FasT-Fix suture device

Arthroscopic dual-bone tunnel repair for palmer type IB injuries of the triangular fibrocartilage complex

BACKGROUND

Triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) injuries, especially Palmer type IB, pose surgical management challenges due to associated distal radial ulnar joint (DRUJ) instability. Traditional surgeries entail risks of complications. Arthroscopic repair presents advantages but lacks consensus on optimal techniques. To evaluate arthroscopic dual-bone tunnel repair in patients with Palmer type IB TFCC injuries of the wrist.

METHODS

In this retrospective case series, grip strength ratio, joint range of motion, pain visual analogue scale (VAS), modified Mayo wrist score, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores were assessed before and 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 45 patients. At 12 months, the grip strength ratio improved from 0.71 ± 0.08 to 0.93 ± 0.05 (P < 0.001), and wrist joint rotation increased from 126.78 ± 13.28° to 145.76 ± 8.52° (P < 0.001). VAS (1.60 ± 0.58 vs. 6.33 ± 0.91, P < 0.001), DASH (12.96 ± 3.18 vs. 46.87 ± 6.62, P < 0.001), and modified Mayo wrist (88.11 ± 4.43 vs. 63.78 ± 7.99, P < 0.001) scores all improved after surgery. The overall complication rate was 4.44%.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic dual-bone tunnel repair appears to be an effective intervention for alleviating wrist pain, restoring stability, and enhancing joint function in patients with TFCC Palmer type IB injuries.

Advances in the Repair of Palmer type IB TFCC Injuries With Wrist Arthroscopy

The triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) is essential for maintaining wrist stability. Injury-caused pain is the primary cause of ulnar wrist pain. The TFCC injury refractory to conservative treatment requires further surgical treatment, and because Palmer type IB tears belong to peripheral injuries due to their proximity to the blood supply area, arthroscopic suture repair has become the preferred surgical method for TFCC injury repair, exhibiting strong healing ability. This study reviewed the anatomy of TFCC, injury classification, and advances in arthroscopic suturing for treating Palmer type IB.

Functional Outcomes Are Similar After Arthroscopic Capsular Repair of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears Between Outside-In Technique and All-Inside Technique Using Pre-Tied Suture Device

PURPOSE

To compare outcomes of arthroscopic triangular fibrocartilage complex capsular repair at 2-year follow-up between outside-in and all-inside techniques.

METHODS

In total, 58 consecutive patients (wrists) with a Palmer 1B triangular fibrocartilage complex tear without symptomatic distal radioulnar joint instability underwent arthroscopic suture repair from 2011 to 2019 including 31 patients via the outside-in technique (group A) and 27 via the all-inside technique using a pre-tied needle device (group B). Two-year follow-up included visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, motion range, grip strength, Mayo Modified Wrist Score (MMWS), the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score, and complication rate. Correlation between functional result and patient satisfaction was analyzed.

RESULTS

Score changes in VAS, wrist flexion-tension, supination-pronation, grip strength, MMWS, and QuickDASH at 2-year follow-up were not significantly different between group A (3.4 ± 0.8, 18.4 ± 17.5, 12.9 ± 13.3, 30.7 ± 11.2, 26.6 ± 7.9 and 19.4 ± 9.9 and group B (3.4 ± 1.0, 18.5 ± 18.3, 15.6 ± 13.7, 30.8 ± 11.4, 28.1 ± 8.6, and 7.6 ± 7.2) with P values of .400, .489, .223, .486, .240, and .223 respectively. Surgical time averaged 105 minutes (78 to 136) in group A and 94 minutes (61-126) in group B with significant difference (P = .012). Patient satisfaction averaged 1.1 (0-3.5) in group A and 1.0 (range 0-3.0) in group B. Satisfaction score was more strongly correlated with QuickDASH (coefficients: 0.863 in group A and 0.918 in group B) than with MMWS (-0.693 in group A and -0.465), grip strength (-0.619 in group A and -0.417 in group B) and VAS score (0.607 in group A and 0.222 in group B).

CONCLUSIONS

Both techniques achieved comparable outcomes with shorter surgical time in all-inside repair using pre-tied needle device. Patient satisfaction was strongly correlated with QuickDASH score.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective therapeutic comparative investigation.