Effect of cytomegalovirus reactivation on the time course of systemic host response biomarkers in previously immunocompetent critically ill patients with sepsis: a matched cohort study

Human cytomegalovirus seropositivity is associated with reduced patient survival during sepsis

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is one of the leading causes of death. Treatment attempts targeting the immune response regularly fail in clinical trials. As HCMV latency can modulate the immune response and changes the immune cell composition, we hypothesized that HCMV serostatus affects mortality in sepsis patients.

METHODS

We determined the HCMV serostatus (i.e., latency) of 410 prospectively enrolled patients of the multicenter SepsisDataNet.NRW study. Patients were recruited according to the SEPSIS-3 criteria and clinical data were recorded in an observational approach. We quantified 13 cytokines at Days 1, 4, and 8 after enrollment. Proteomics data were analyzed from the plasma samples of 171 patients.

RESULTS

The 30-day mortality was higher in HCMV-seropositive patients than in seronegative sepsis patients (38% vs. 25%, respectively; p = 0.008; HR, 1.656; 95% CI 1.135-2.417). This effect was observed independent of age (p = 0.010; HR, 1.673; 95% CI 1.131-2.477). The predictive value on the outcome of the increased concentrations of IL-6 was present only in the seropositive cohort (30-day mortality, 63% vs. 24%; HR 3.250; 95% CI 2.075-5.090; p < 0.001) with no significant differences in serum concentrations of IL-6 between the two groups. Procalcitonin and IL-10 exhibited the same behavior and were predictive of the outcome only in HCMV-seropositive patients.

CONCLUSION

We suggest that the predictive value of inflammation-associated biomarkers should be re-evaluated with regard to the HCMV serostatus. Targeting HCMV latency might open a new approach to selecting suitable patients for individualized treatment in sepsis.

Dynamics of Inflammatory and Neurodegenerative Biomarkers after Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Sclerosis

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT) is a highly efficient treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS), and hence it likely normalizes pathological and/or enhances beneficial processes in MS. The disease pathomechanisms include neuroinflammation, glial cell activation and neuronal damage. We studied biomarkers that in part reflect these, like markers for neuroinflammation (C-X-C motif chemokine ligand (CXCL) 9, CXCL10, CXCL13, and chitinase 3-like 1 (CHI3L1)), glial perturbations (glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and in part CHI3L1), and neurodegeneration (neurofilament light chain (NfL)) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) and single-molecule array assay (SIMOA) in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of 32 MS patients that underwent aHSCT. We sampled before and at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after aHSCT for serum, as well as before and 24 months after aHSCT for CSF. We found a strong increase of serum CXCL10, NfL and GFAP one month after the transplantation, which normalized one and two years post-aHSCT. CXCL10 was particularly increased in patients that experienced reactivation of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, but not those with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation. Furthermore, patients with CMV reactivation showed increased Th1 phenotype in effector memory CD4+ T cells. Changes of the other serum markers were more subtle with a trend for an increase in serum CXCL9 early post-aHSCT. In CSF, GFAP levels were increased 24 months after aHSCT, which may indicate sustained astroglia activation 24 months post-aHSCT. Other CSF markers remained largely stable. We conclude that MS-related biomarkers indicate neurotoxicity early after aHSCT that normalizes after one year while astrocyte activation appears increased beyond that, and increased serum CXCL10 likely does not reflect inflammation within the central nervous system (CNS) but rather occurs in the context of CMV reactivation or other infections post-aHSCT.

Comparative clinical manifestations and immune effects of cytomegalovirus infections following distinct types of immunosuppression

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a well-recognized complication of solid organ and hematopoietic cell transplantation. However, CMV infection also occurs in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, previously immunocompetent intensive care unit (ICU) patients, and individuals on immunosuppressive medications for various underlying diseases.

OBJECTIVES

This review describes the comparative effects of CMV infection in distinct types of acquired immunosuppression.

SOURCES

Selected peer-reviewed publications on CMV infections published until December 2021.

CONTENT

CMV infection affects various organ systems through direct cytolytic mechanisms, but may also exert indirect effects by promoting pro-inflammatory and immunosuppressive responses. This has been well studied in transplant recipients, for whom antiviral prophylaxis and pre-emptive therapy have now become standard practice. These strategies not only prevent direct CMV disease manifestations, but also mitigate various immunopathological processes to reduce graft-versus-host disease, graft rejection, and the occurrence of secondary bacterial and fungal infections. The efficacy of neither prophylactic nor pre-emptive treatment of CMV infection has been demonstrated for patients with critical illness- or medication-induced immunosuppression. Many observational studies have shown an independent association between CMV reactivation and a prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation or increased mortality in the ICU. Furthermore, data suggest that CMV reactivation may increase pulmonary inflammation and prolong the duration of mechanical ventilation.

IMPLICATIONS

A large number of observational and experimental studies suggest attributable morbidity and mortality related to CMV infection, not only in transplant recipients and patients with HIV infection but also in patients with critically illness- or medication-induced immunosuppression. Adequately powered randomized controlled trials investigating the efficacy of prophylaxis or pre-emptive treatment of CMV infection in these patients are lacking, with a notable exception for transplant recipients.

Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis is associated with cytomegalovirus viremia in critically ill patients - A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia is associated with a higher mortality rate and prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay for critically ill patients. CMV infection causes transient but substantial immunosuppression for transplant recipients, increasing risk of fungal infection. The association between CMV viremia and invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) for critically ill patients is still unknown.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients received bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), galactomannan test, influenza survey and blood CMV viral load test in ICUs of a university hospital between April 2017 and May 2020. Independent risks for IPA were analyzed by multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 136 patients were included. Twenty-one patients had IPA, 48 patients had CMV viremia and 22 patients had influenza. In a multivariable logistic regression model, patients with CMV viremia or influenza had higher IPA risk (adjusted odds ratio, 3.98 and 8.72; 95% CI, 1.26-12.60 and 2.64-28.82; p value = 0.019 and <0.001, respectively.). Patients with detectable CMV in BAL fluid did not have higher IPA risk (crude odds ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.33-2.79; p value = 0.933). After stratifying patients by CMV viral load, the IPA risk is higher for patients with higher viral loads. There is an additive synergistic effect on IPA risk between CMV viremia and influenza infection.

CONCLUSION

For critically ill patients, CMV viremia is an independent risk factor of IPA. Patients with higher blood CMV viral loads have a higher risk of IPA. CMV viremia and influenza have an additive synergistic effect for IPA risk in critically ill patients.

Respiratory viral sepsis: epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment

According to the Third International Consensus Definition for Sepsis and Septic Shock, sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction resulting from dysregulated host responses to infection. Epidemiological data about sepsis from the 2017 Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries and Risk Factor Study showed that the global burden of sepsis was greater than previously estimated. Bacteria have been shown to be the predominant pathogen of sepsis among patients with pathogens detected, while sepsis caused by viruses is underdiagnosed worldwide. The coronavirus disease that emerged in 2019 in China and now in many other countries has brought viral sepsis back into the vision of physicians and researchers worldwide. Although the current understanding of the pathophysiology of sepsis has improved, the differences between viral and bacterial sepsis at the level of pathophysiology are not well understood. Diagnosis methods that can broadly differentiate between bacterial and viral sepsis at the initial stage after the development of sepsis are limited. New treatments that can be applied at clinics for sepsis are scarce and this situation is not consistent with the growing understanding of pathophysiology. This review aims to give a brief summary of current knowledge of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of viral sepsis.

Cytomegalovirus: A Troll in the ICU? Overview of the Literature and Perspectives for the Future

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is one of the most pathogenic viruses in human. After a primary infection, CMV resides in the host for life as a latent infection. When immunity is reduced, CMV can escape the suppressive effects of the immune system and lead to viremia and antigenemia. This reactivation, first seen in transplant patients, has also been documented in non-immunocompromised CMV-seropositive critically ill patients and is associated with higher morbidity and mortality. In the latter, it is not clear whether CMV reactivation is an innocent bystander or the cause of this observed worse outcome. Two studies showed no difference in the outcome of CMV-seropositive and seronegative patients. In addition, proof-of-concept studies investigating prophylactic antiviral treatment to prevent CMV reactivation during critical illness, failed to show a beneficial effect on interleukin levels or clinical outcome. Further research is necessary to resolve the question whether CMV replication impairs the prognosis in non-immunocompromised critically ill patients. We here give a concise overview on the available data and propose strategies to further unravel this question. First, post-mortem investigation may be useful to evaluate the effect of viral replication on organ inflammation and function. Second, further research should focus on the question whether the level of viremia needs to exceed a threshold to be associated with worse outcome. Third, clinical and biochemical assessments may help to identify patients at high risk for reactivation. Fourth, preemptive treatment based upon early detection of the virus is currently under investigation. Finally, immune-stimulating biologicals may be beneficial in high-risk groups.

Current Understanding of Cytomegalovirus Reactivation in Critical Illness

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation has been described in adults with critical illness caused by diverse etiologies, especially severe sepsis, and observational studies have linked CMV reactivation with worse clinical outcomes in this setting. In this study, we review observational clinical data linking development of CMV reactivation with worse outcomes in patients in the intensive care unit, discuss potential biologically plausible mechanisms for a causal association, and summarize results of initial interventional trials that examined the effects of CMV prevention. These data, taken together, highlight the need for a randomized, placebo-controlled efficacy trial (1) to definitively determine whether prevention of CMV reactivation improves clinical outcomes of patients with critical illness and (2) to define the underlying mechanism(s).

Reactivation of Cytomegalovirus Increases Nitric Oxide and IL-10 Levels in Sepsis and is Associated with Changes in Renal Parameters and Worse Clinical Outcome

CMV reactivation has been widely associated with bacterial sepsis and occurs in approximately 30% of these individuals, is associated with a longer ICU stay, prolongation of the need for mechanical ventilation, and over 80% increase in the mortality rate, being directly associated with severe organ dysfunction and hemodynamic imbalance. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the role of CMV reactivation in sepsis progression. The overall occurrence of cytomegalovirus reactivation in the cohort was 17.58%. Was observed an increase in plasma levels of NO, reduction of percentage of free days of mechanical ventilation and arterial pH, as well as changes in coagulation parameters in the reactivated group. There was also a significant increase in IL-10, creatinine, urea levels and reduction of 24-hour urine output. These variables still correlated with viral load, demonstrating an association between the reactivation process and kidney failure present in sepsis. The reactivated group still had 2.1 times the risk of developing septic shock and an increase in the mortality rates. CMV is reactivated in sepsis and these patients presented a higher risk of developing septic shock and higher mortality rates and our data suggest that IL-10 and NO may be involved in this process.

Challenges and Clinical Implications of the Diagnosis of Cytomegalovirus Lung Infection in Children

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pulmonary cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a potential lethal disease in children, but it remains a diagnostic challenge. The differentiation between latent CMV infections with viral shedding and active infections is difficult and may lead to false positives in bronchoalvolar lavage (BAL) PCR detection. This review summarizes current diagnostic approaches for CMV lung infection in children including progress in the identification of underlying immune defects linked to this condition.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is increasing literature supporting that the combined assessment of host risk factors and lung disease pattern is essential for the diagnosis of pulmonary CMV infection in children. The most important host risk factor is an immunecompromised state that has expanded from primary or acquired immunodeficiency (e.g., HIV) to include a myriad of immune-dysregulation syndromes (e.g., CTLA4, PIK3 defects). Newborns, paricularly those born premature, are also a high-risk group. At the pulmonary level, active CMV infection is typically characterized by alveolar compromise leading to hypoxemia, ground-glass opacities, and intra-alveolar infiltrates with CMV inclusions in lung biopsy. The identification of active CMV lung infection should trigger additional evaluation of immune defects (primary or secondary) impairing T and NK cell function or innate antiviral responses as well as other immune dysregulation disorders. Lung CMV infections in children are more prevalent in immunocompromised hosts and premature newborns. Lung CMV infections should prompt further investigation into conditions altering immune mechanisms usually in place to contain CMV infections. Common clinical and radiological patterns such as hypoxemia and ground-glass pulmonary opacities may allow early identification and treatment of CMV lung infection and underlying causes in the pediatric population.