Effects of indexes of consciousness (IoC1 and IoC2) monitoring on remifentanil dosage in modified radical mastectomy: a randomized trial

Index of Consciousness monitoring may effectively predict and prevent circulatory stress induced by endotracheal intubation under general anesthesia: a prospective randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The primary objective of anesthesiologists during the induction of anaesthesia is to mitigate the operative stress response resulting from endotracheal intubation. In this prospective, randomized controlled trial, our aim was to assess the feasibility and efficacy of employing Index of Consciousness (IoC, IoC1 and IoC2) monitoring in predicting and mitigating circulatory stress induced by endotracheal intubation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients under general anesthesia (GA).

METHODS

We enrolled one hundred and twenty patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy under GA and randomly allocated them to two groups: IoC monitoring guidance (Group T, n = 60) and bispectral index (BIS) monitoring guidance (Group C, n = 60). The primary endpoints included the heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) of the patients, as well as the rate of change (ROC) at specific time points during the endotracheal intubation period. Secondary outcomes encompassed the systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), cardiac output index (CI), stroke volume index (SVI), ROC at specific time points, the incidence of adverse events (AEs), and the induction dosage of remifentanil and propofol during the endotracheal intubation period in both groups.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) HR at 1 min after intubation under IoC monitoring guidance was significantly lower than that under BIS monitoring guidance (76 (16) beats/min vs. 82 (16) beats/min, P = 0.049, respectively). Similarly, the mean (SD) MAP at 1 min after intubation under IoC monitoring guidance was lower than that under BIS monitoring guidance (90 (20) mmHg vs. 98 (19) mmHg, P = 0.031, respectively). At each time point from 1 to 5 min after intubation, the number of cases with HR ROC of less than 10% in Group T was significantly higher than in Group C (P < 0.05). Furthermore, between 1 and 3 min and at 5 min post-intubation, the number of cases with HR ROC between 20 to 30% or 40% in Group T was significantly lower than that in Group C (P < 0.05). At 1 min post-intubation, the number of cases with MAP ROC of less than 10% in Group T was significantly higher than that in Group C (P < 0.05), and the number of cases with MAP ROC between 10 to 20% in Group T was significantly lower than that in Group C (P < 0.01). Patients in Group T exhibited superior hemodynamic stability during the peri-endotracheal intubation period compared to those in Group C. There were no significant differences in the frequencies of AEs between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This promising monitoring technique has the potential to predict the circulatory stress response, thereby reducing the incidence of adverse reactions during the peri-endotracheal intubation period. This technology holds promise for optimizing anesthesia management.

TRAIL REGISTRATION

 Chinese Clinical Trail Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2300070237 (20/04/2022).

Am I Sedated or in Pain? Please Monitor by Brain

How to cite this article: Gupta A, Tomar DS. Am I Sedated or in Pain? Please Monitor by Brain. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(6):531-532.

Index of consciousness monitoring during general anesthesia may effectively enhance rehabilitation in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic urological surgery: a randomized controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Based on electroencephalogram (EEG) analysis, index of consciousness (IoC) monitoring is a new technique for monitoring anesthesia depth. IoC is divided into IoC1 (depth of sedation) and IoC2 (depth of analgesia). The potential for concurrent monitoring of IoC1 and IoC2 to expedite postoperative convalescence remains to be elucidated. We investigated whether combined monitoring of IoC1 and IoC2 can effectively enhances postoperative recovery compared with bispectral index (BIS) in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic urological surgery under general anesthesia.

METHODS

In this prospective, controlled, double-blinded trail, 120 patients aged 65 years or older were arbitrarily assigned to either the IoC group or the control group (BIS monitoring). All patients underwent blood gas analysis at T1 (before anesthesia induction) and T2 (the end of operation). The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) were administered to all patients at T0 (1 day before surgery) and T4 (7 days after surgery). Serum concentrations of C-reactive protein (CRP) and glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP) were assessed at T1, T2, and T3 (24 h after surgery). Postoperative complications and the duration of hospitalization were subjected to comparative evaluation.

RESULTS

The incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) was notably lower in the IoC group (10%) than in the control group (31.7%) (P = 0.003). Postoperative serum CRP and GFAP concentrations exhibited significant differences at time points T2 (CRP: P = 0.000; GFAP: P = 0.000) and T3 (CRP: P = 0.003; GFAP: P = 0.008). Postoperative blood glucose levels (P = 0.000) and the overall rate of complications (P = 0.037) were significantly lower in Group IoC than in Group control.

CONCLUSION

The employment of IoC monitoring for the management of elderly surgical patients can accelerate postoperative convalescence by mitigating intraoperative stress and reducing peripheral and central inflammatory injury.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR1900025241 (17/08/2019).

Effects of qCON and qNOX-guided general anaesthesia management on patient opioid use and prognosis: a study protocol

INTRODUCTION

The adverse effects of general anaesthetic drugs (especially opioids) cannot be ignored. However, current nociceptive-monitoring techniques still lack consistency in guiding the use of opioids. This trial will study the demand for opioid use and patient prognosis in qCON and qNOX-guided general anaesthesia management.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This prospective, randomised, controlled trial will randomly recruit 124 patients undergoing general anaesthesia for non-cardiac surgery in equal numbers to either the qCON or BIS group. The qCON group will adjust intraoperative propofol and remifentanil dosage according to qCON and qNOX values, while the BIS group will adjust according to BIS values and haemodynamic fluctuations. The differences between the two groups will be observed in remifentanil dosing and prognosis. The primary outcome will be intraoperative remifentanil use. Secondary outcomes will include propofol consumption; the predictive ability of BIS, qCON and qNOX on conscious responses, noxious stimulus and body movements; and changes in cognitive function at 90 days postoperatively.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study involves human participants and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Tianjin Medical University General Hospital (IRB2022-YX-075-01). Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part. The study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant academic conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2200059877.

Nociception monitors vs. standard practice for titration of opioid administration in general anesthesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Nociception monitors are being increasingly used during surgery, but their effectiveness in guiding intraoperative opioid administration is still uncertain. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to compare the effectiveness of nociception monitors vs. standard practice for opioid administration titration during general anesthesia.

Methods

We searched the electronic databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Clinical Trial, and Web of Science from inception up to August 1, 2021, to identify relevant articles, and extracted the relevant data. Intraoperative opioid administration, extubation time, postoperative pain score, postoperative opioid consumption and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were compared between patients receiving nociception monitoring guidance and patients receiving standard management. The standardized mean difference (SMD), with 95% confidence interval (CI), was used to assess the significance of differences. The risk ratio (RR), with 95% CI, was used to assess the difference in incidence of PONV. Heterogeneity among the included trials was evaluated by the I² test. RevMan 5.3 software was used for statistical analysis.

Results

A total of 21 RCTs (with 1957 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Intraoperative opioid administration was significantly lower in patients receiving nociception monitor-guided analgesia than in patients receiving standard management (SMD, −0.71; 95% CI, −1.07 to −0.36; P < 0.001). However, pain scores and postoperative opioid consumption were not significantly higher in the former group. Considerable heterogeneity was found among the studies (92%). Extubation time was significantly shorter (SMD, −0.22; 95% CI, −0.41 to −0.03; P = 0.02) and the incidence of PONV significantly lower (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.00; P = 0.05) in patients receiving nociception monitoring guidance.

Conclusions

Intraoperative nociception monitoring guidance may reduce intraoperative opioid administration and appears to be a viable strategy for intraoperative titration of opioids.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=273619, identifier: CRD42019129776.

Effects of Depth of Anesthesia Monitored by IoC on Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Colorectal Cancer

Index of consciousness (IoC) consisting of IoC1 and IoC2, is a new analgesia monitoring indicator in anesthesia evaluation in the laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer. Although the precise anesthetic dosage adjusted by IoC1 has been confirmed to enhance the recovery and reduce the complications of anesthesia, the most appropriate range of IoC2 during anesthesia remains unclear. To investigate the correlation between IoC2 and peri-operative indicators of patients during laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer, the current randomized, controlled, and single-blinded clinical trial was performed. Participants were divided randomly into three groups with different anesthesia depth monitored by IoC2 during their laparoscopic radical resections. Primary outcomes included the dosage of remifentanil. Secondary outcomes included other physiological indexes and complications. The remifentanil dosage and the awakening time increased as IoC2 decreased. The incidences of hypotension and hypoxemia decreased with the elevated IoC2, but the risk of intra-operative awareness also increased. The impact caused by anesthesia to the immune system and health-related life quality of the patients descended with reduced anesthetic level. The IoC2 range of 35–45 could represent the most appropriate anesthetic depth during laparoscopic radical resection, which provides a new perspective for the clinical treatment of colon cancer.

Effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the depth of total intravenous anesthesia in patients with breast cancer undergoing unilateral modified radical mastectomy: A prospective observational study

Toxic effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) on nervous, hepatorenal, and pulmonary systems might affect general anesthesia depth. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of NC on depth of total intravenous anesthesia.This prospective observational study enrolled 60 patients undergoing elective unilateral modified radical mastectomy during total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil (January-June 2015; Liaocheng People's Hospital, China): the NC group (n = 30) received NC, while the control group (n = 30) did not. Propofol and remifentanil dosages were adjusted according to indexes of consciousness (IoC1: sedation; IoC2: analgesia) to control fluctuations of blood pressure and heart rate within 20% of baseline values. Parameters reflecting propofol/remifentanil dosages, intraoperative adverse events, and quality of anesthetic recovery were recorded.The duration of propofol infusion (1.3 ± 0.4 vs 1.8 ± 0.5 hours, P < .05), mean propofol dosage (8.0 ± 1.0 vs 9.3 ± 1.5 mg kg h, P < .05), and adjustment frequency of target-controlled remifentanil infusion (2.9 ± 1.8 vs 4.4 ± 2.6 times/surgery, P < .05) were significantly lower in the NC group than in the control group; adjustment frequency of target-controlled propofol infusion was also numerically lower (2.0 ± 1.1 vs 2.7 ± 1.5 times/surgery, P = .053). Duration of remifentanil infusion, mean remifentanil dosage, voluntary eye opening, extubation time, and recovery score were not significantly different between groups. The incidence of tachycardia was lower in the NC group than in the control group (7.1% vs 37.0%, P < .05), but there was no significant difference in the incidence of total adverse events between groups.NC can enhance the sensitivity of breast cancer patients to the anesthetic effect of propofol.

Effects of small-dose remifentanil combined with index of consciousness monitoring on gastroscopic polypectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded trial

BACKGROUND

With the development of painless diagnosis and treatment, remifentanil, a synthetic opioid agonist, is increasingly used in gastroscopy for its rapid, short-term, and potent analgesic effect. However, the dosage of remifentanil used in endoscopy is unclear. Index of consciousness (IOC) is a new anesthesia depth-monitoring indicator that can be divided into index of consciousness 1 (IOC₁) and index of consciousness 2 (IOC₂); IOC₁ is used for estimating a patient's sedation state, whereas IOC₂ reflects analgesic depth. We hypothesized that combining with IOC₁ and IOC₂ monitoring may be helpful to identify an optimal remifentanil dosage in gastroscopic polypectomy.

METHODS

One hundred twenty patients scheduled for gastroscopic polypectomy were enrolled and were randomly assigned to remifentanil 2 ng/mL (group R2), 4 ng/mL (group R4), or 6 ng/mL (group R6), and 40 cases were in each group. During the anesthesia period, remifentanil was kept at the initial given concentration but propofol was adjusted according to IOC₁. The primary outcomes were the dosage of propofol and remifentanil. The secondary outcomes were the variety of IOC₁ and IOC₂, patients' awakening time, and peri-operative adverse reactions such as hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, tachycardia, body movements, hypoxemia, therapy interruption, nausea, vomiting, aspiration, and intra-operative awareness.

RESULTS

With the increasing dosage of remifentanil, the propofol dosage and patients' awakening time decreased significantly, the morbidity of hypertension and body movements also declined, but the incidence of hypotension, bradycardia, and hypoxemia rose. In group R2, the value of IOC₂ remained above 50 during the treatment. However, IOC₂ dropped to below 30 at the beginning of the gastroscopy in group R6, and there was statistical difference in hypoxemia between groups R2 and R6 (P <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

With the help of IOC monitoring, we found that a target concentration of remifentanil 4 ng/mL is comparatively ideal in patients under gastroscopic polypectomy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Register: ChiCTR-OOD-16009489 , on October 19, 2016.