Yoga and breathing technique training in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial

The Effect of Stress-Reducing Interventions on Heart Rate Variability in Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Stress is recognized as a significant trigger and exacerbator of various medical conditions, particularly in the field of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Given that heart rate variability (HRV) offers insight into the functioning of the autonomic nervous system and has been identified as a predictive factor for increased cardiovascular mortality, exploring the correlation between stress and HRV is pertinent. We systematically reviewed trials where researchers investigated the effects of stress-reducing interventions on biomarkers and time-domain/frequency-domain parameters of HRV in CVD. Eligible studies underwent meta-analysis utilizing a random-effects model. The meta-analysis showed overall beneficial effects of stress-reducing interventions on HRV for the standard deviation of Normal-to-Normal intervals (SDNN) in short-term and 24 h assessments, as well as for the low-frequency power (LF) in short-term assessment. Overall effect sizes were notably high and showed significant p-values (short-term SDNN: MD = 6.43, p = 0.01; 24 h SDNN: MD = 10.92, p = 0.004; short-term LF: MD = 160.11, p < 0.001). Our findings highlight the significant impact of stress-reducing interventions in modulating HRV by influencing short-term SDNN and LF parameters, as well as the 24 h assessment of SDNN. These results emphasize the importance of stress-reducing measures in lowering the risk of further progression in CVD and improving patient outcomes.

Effect of slow breathing exercise and progressive muscle relaxation technique in the individual with essential hypertension: A randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

The present study aims to investigate the combined effect of slow breathing exercise (SBE) and progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) technique on blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), and anxiety in patients diagnosed with essential hypertension.

TRIAL DESIGN

This study was based on a 4-arm parallel-group, randomized control design.

METHODS

Sixty-four participants diagnosed with essential hypertension were randomly allocated into SBE, PMR, SBE-PMR, and Control groups, with 16 subjects each. All 3 groups received different treatments according to their name; however, the Control group received no treatment. Systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP), HR, RR, and anxiety were all evaluated as the study outcomes using a digital sphygmomanometer and perceived stress scale (PSS) at baseline (pretest), 2nd week and 4th weeks post-intervention. A repeated measure analysis of variance test assessed intra-group comparison (overall) analyses across multiple time points. Bonferroni multiple comparison tests were used to analyze the mean differences between the groups. The confidence interval was kept at 95% for all the statistical analyses, that is, P < .05 is considered significant.

RESULTS

There was a significant change in the HR (F = 239.04, P = .0001), RR (F = 167.74, P = .0001), SBP (F = 266.64, P = .0001), DSP (F = 279.80, P = .0001), and PSS (F = 473.42, P = .0001) as an outcome of baseline measurements versus (vs) the following weeks. There were significant (F = 48.57, P = .001) differences among different training on HR. The SBE vs SBE-PMR showed an insignificant difference (F = 48.54, P = 1.000). The RR showed significant differences (F = 32.05, 0.0001) between the SBE vs PMR, SBE vs Control, PMR vs Control, and SBE-PMR vs Control groups and insignificant differences for the SBE vs SBE-PMR and PMR vs SBE-PMR groups. The SBE vs SBE-PMR groups showed insignificant differences for DPP and SBP. However, PSS showed significant differences (F = 67.12, P = .0001) among the intervention groups except for the PMR and SBE-PMR groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined interventions of SBEs and progressive muscle relaxation techniques can effectively reduce the heart rate, respiratory rate, BP, and anxiety in essential hypertensive patients compared to both techniques when given alone.

The Effect of Pranayama Applied to Hemodialysis Patients on Fatigue: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The present study was conducted to examine the effects of Pranayama applied to hemodialysis patients on fatigue. The study was completed with 91 patients, including Pranayama (n = 30), Relaxation (n = 30), and Control groups (n = 31). The patients in the Pranayama group applied the interventions 15 to 20 minutes every day, once a day, for a total of 3 months, and the patients in the relaxation practice group applied the interventions 15 to 20 minutes every day, once a day, for a total of 3 months. Before the study commenced, permission was obtained from health care institutions, the ethics committee, and the patients. The data were collected with a Questionnaire, Piper Fatigue Scale (PFS), visual analog scale, and Vital Findings Form. Piper Fatigue Scale consists of 4 subdimensions, the total score obtained from the scale varies between 0 and 10, and as the score increases, the level of fatigue also increases. It was found that the patients in the Pranayama Group had decreased PFS total and subdimension mean scores after the procedure (P < .05); however, no significant changes were detected in the PFS total and subdimension mean scores of the patients in the Relaxation and Control groups (P > .05). Although the decrease in the daily fatigue severity of the patients in the Pranayama group was at a statistically significant level (P < .05), no statistically significant changes were detected in the fatigue severity of the patients in the Relaxation and Control groups (P > .05). It was also found that the blood pressure values of the patients in the Pranayama and Relaxation groups decreased (P < .05). It was found in the present study that Pranayama reduced the fatigue levels of hemodialysis patients. In this respect, it is recommended to teach and apply Pranayama techniques to patients with the support of nurses.

Physical and psychological impact of yoga therapy in improving heart failure

Effective therapy for patients with chronic cardiac failure (CCF) entails significant lifestyle modifications as well as often complex pharmaceutical regimes to alleviate symptoms, which, however, do not actually cure many patients. The gradual loss of cardiac function is impeded but not halted by such complicated pharmacological therapy, which primarily includes angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-blockers and diuretics, and sometimes digoxin, aspirin, warfarin, and anti-arrhythmic agents. Patients may be advised to track their weight and modify their diuretic prescription accordingly to avoid fluid overload or dehydration as part of the treatment plan. Non-pharmacologic treatment options are routinely integrated to improve the management of somatic complaints. Yoga and specialized breathing exercises seem to help CCF patients improve their cardiorespiratory and autonomic system function, and also their quality of life. We present the evidence.

Yoga as an adjuvant therapy in heart failure patients on optimal medical management analysed using echocardiographic parameters

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) is a chronic complex disease that prevails as a prime cause of concern for healthcare sectors worldwide, with a concordant objective to improve the long-term prognosis. Analysis of the available literature is evidence that yoga therapy and basic lifestyle modifications have considerably augmented heart failure patients' quality of life and enhanced left ventricular ejection fraction and NYHA functional class.

AIM

Our study aims to establish the long-term outcomes of yoga therapy to validate the addition of yoga therapy as a complementary treatment in managing HF.

METHODS

A prospective non-randomized study was conducted at a tertiary care center including seventy-five HF patients with NYHA class III or less who underwent coronary intervention, revascularization, or device therapy within the past six months to one year and continuing guideline-directed optimal medical therapy (GDMT). Thirty-five participants were part of the Interventional Group (IG), and forty were in the Non-Interventional Group (Non-IG). The IG received yoga therapy and GDMT, while the non-IG were only under standard GDMT. Echocardiographic parameters were compared at various follow-ups up to one year to see the impact of Yoga therapy on HF patients.

RESULTS

A total of 75 heart failure patients, including 61 males and 14 females. The IG and non-IG had 35 subjects (31 males and 4 females) and 40 subjects (30 males and 10 females), respectively. Echocardiographic parameters were observed to compare the IG and Non-IG groups, and those did not demonstrate any significant difference between the two groups (p-value > 0.05). But, the echocardiographic parameters of the IG and non-IG from baseline to six months and one year showed a significant improvement (p-value of <0.05). The functional outcome (NYHA classes) was assessed after follow-up, and a p-value <0.05 showed a substantial improvement in the IG.

CONCLUSION

Yoga therapy results in better prognosis, functional outcome, and left ventricular performance in HF patients with NYHA III or less. Hence this investigation has attempted to justify its importance as adjuvant/complimentary treatment for HF patients.

The Need for Breathing Training Techniques: The Elephant in the Heart Failure Cardiac Rehabilitation Room: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Although solid evidence has indicated that respiratory symptoms are common amongst patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), state-of-the-art cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs do not typically include management strategies to address respiratory symptoms. This study investigated the effect of the addition of breathing exercises (BE) to the CR programs in CHF.

METHODS

In a two parallel-arm randomized controlled study (RCT), 40 middle-aged patients with CHF and respiratory symptoms were recruited and randomized into two equal groups (n = 20); group (A): standard CR with BE and group (B): standard CR alone. Primary outcomes were respiratory parameters and secondary outcomes included cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary outcomes. All the participants attended a program of aerobic exercise (three sessions/week, 60-75% MHR, 45-55 min) for 12 weeks, plus educational, nutritional, and psychological counseling. Group (A) patients attended the same program together with BE using inspiratory muscle training (IMT) and breathing calisthenics (BC) (six sessions/week, 15-25 min) for the same duration.

RESULTS

There was a significant improvement in the respiratory outcomes, and most of the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary outcomes in both groups with a greater change percentage in group A (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that the addition of BE to the CR programs in CHF is effective and is a "patient-centered" approach.

Role of Mind-Body Intervention on Lipid Profile: A Cross-sectional Study

Background

Yoga is a combination of physical-breathing and meditative techniques that assist in the unification of the mind-body, which improves the quality of life. It was shown that long-term Yoga practitioners had superior control over respiratory rate, reduced stress and anxiety, and a better-controlled lipid profile.

Purpose

We aimed to investigate the lipid profile of long-term yoga practitioners who were practicing yoga for more than 1 year in comparison with the nonyoga group.

Methods

A nationwide survey was conducted in which the long-term yoga practitioners (n = 76) and nonyoga practitioners (n = 80) were recruited for assessment for the lipid parameters.

Results

The mean (standard deviation) values of both groups were within normal range with serum cholesterol at 189.715 ± 20.4 and 180.88 ± 29.7 and triglycerides at 216.72 ± 92.5 and 207.665 ± 88.3, low-density lipoprotein at 126.65 ± 18.5 and 120.775 ± 26.5, and high-density lipoprotein at 47.17 ± 6.6 and 44.99 ± 7.0, respectively, in yoga and no-yoga groups.

Conclusion

The lipid profile values were similar in yoga and nonyoga practitioners in the 2017 survey.

Pranayama and Nursing

The importance of complementary and supportive applications is increasing. Pranayama, which is one of these methods, has a positive effect on health with its philosophy and discipline that are specific to it. It is also an important step in yoga, which is an ancient Indian science and lifestyle, and is translated as "breath science, breath control, and willful breathing." In Sanskrit, pranayama consists of the words prana, which means "life force, vital energy, vitality," and yama, which means "control." According to the science of yoga, if humans can learn to control prana, they can also control their body, emotions, and mind. The fact that pranayama is a simple self-control technique that increases the awareness of breathing and shows that it is an influential and cost-effective practice for the patient in the management of symptoms, which is a responsibility of nurses. In this respect, the purpose of the present study was to provide information to health care professionals to be able to use pranayama types in symptom management, to provide evidence-based information to health care professions concerning concepts and philosophy of pranayama to guide nurses in clinical practice. For this purpose, the results of the studies searched in the PubMed database using the key words "pranayama" and "nursing" are shared.

Inspiratory Muscle Training in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Meta-Analysis

Objectives To explore the role of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) in improving cardiorespiratory fitness of stable heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients. Background There is a paucity of data on the role of IMT in patients with HFpEF. HFpEF is a growing problem in the developed world, especially in the aging population. Methods We conducted a systematic literature search for English studies in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We searched databases using terms relating to or describing breathing exercise, IMT, and HFpEF. RevMan 5.4 (The Cochrane Collaboration, 2020) was used for data analysis, and two independent investigators performed literature retrieval and data extraction. Results We identified three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one prospective study on the role of IMT in HFpEF. We calculated the pooled mean difference of peak oxygen consumption (Peak VO2) and six-min walk distance (6MWD) between the IMT and standard care (SC) groups. Our meta-analysis showed that compared with SC, IMT could significantly improve peak VO2 with a mean difference (MD) of 2.82 ml/kg/min, 95% CI [1.90, 3.74] P < 0.00001 and improve 6MWD with MD of 83.97 meters, 95% CI [59.18, 108.76] P< 0.00001 to improve cardiorespiratory fitness at 12 weeks of IMT and improve peak VO2 with MD of 2.18 ml/kg/min, 95% CI [0.38, 3.99] P < 0.00001 at 24 weeks of therapy. Conclusion IMT should be further studied as a possible treatment option to improve cardiorespiratory fitness for patients with stable HFpEF.

Breathing exercises for adults with asthma

BACKGROUND

Breathing exercises have been widely used worldwide as a non-pharmacological therapy to treat people with asthma. Breathing exercises aim to control the symptoms of asthma and can be performed as the Papworth Method, the Buteyko breathing technique, yogic breathing, deep diaphragmatic breathing or any other similar intervention that manipulates the breathing pattern. The training of breathing usually focuses on tidal and minute volume and encourages relaxation, exercise at home, the modification of breathing pattern, nasal breathing, holding of breath, lower rib cage and abdominal breathing.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the evidence for the efficacy of breathing exercises in the management of people with asthma.

SEARCH METHODS

To identify relevant studies we searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and AMED and performed handsearching of respiratory journals and meeting abstracts. We also consulted trials registers and reference lists of included articles. The most recent literature search was on 4 April 2019.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials of breathing exercises in adults with asthma compared with a control group receiving asthma education or, alternatively, with no active control group.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed study quality and extracted data. We used Review Manager 5 software for data analysis based on the random-effects model. We expressed continuous outcomes as mean differences (MDs) with confidence intervals (CIs) of 95%. We assessed heterogeneity by inspecting the forest plots. We applied the Chi2 test, with a P value of 0.10 indicating statistical significance, and the I2 statistic, with a value greater than 50% representing a substantial level of heterogeneity. The primary outcome was quality of life.

MAIN RESULTS

We included nine new studies (1910 participants) in this update, resulting in a total of 22 studies involving 2880 participants in the review. Fourteen studies used Yoga as the intervention, four studies involved breathing retraining, one the Buteyko method, one the Buteyko method and pranayama, one the Papworth method and one deep diaphragmatic breathing. The studies were different from one another in terms of type of breathing exercise performed, number of participants enrolled, number of sessions completed, period of follow-up, outcomes reported and statistical presentation of data. Asthma severity in participants from the included studies ranged from mild to moderate, and the samples consisted solely of outpatients. Twenty studies compared breathing exercise with inactive control, and two with asthma education control groups. Meta-analysis was possible for the primary outcome quality of life and the secondary outcomes asthma symptoms, hyperventilation symptoms, and some lung function variables. Assessment of risk of bias was impaired by incomplete reporting of methodological aspects of most of the included studies. We did not include adverse effects as an outcome in the review. Breathing exercises versus inactive control For quality of life, measured by the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), meta-analysis showed improvement favouring the breathing exercises group at three months (MD 0.42, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.68; 4 studies, 974 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and at six months the OR was 1.34 for the proportion of people with at least 0.5 unit improvement in AQLQ, (95% CI 0.97 to 1.86; 1 study, 655 participants). For asthma symptoms, measured by the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), meta-analysis at up to three months was inconclusive, MD of -0.15 units (95% CI -2.32 to 2.02; 1 study, 115 participants; low-certainty evidence), and was similar over six months (MD -0.08 units, 95% CI -0.22 to 0.07; 1 study, 449 participants). For hyperventilation symptoms, measured by the Nijmegen Questionnaire (from four to six months), meta-analysis showed less symptoms with breathing exercises (MD -3.22, 95% CI -6.31 to -0.13; 2 studies, 118 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), but this was not shown at six months (MD 0.63, 95% CI -0.90 to 2.17; 2 studies, 521 participants). Meta-analyses for forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) measured at up to three months was inconclusive, MD -0.10 L, (95% CI -0.32 to 0.12; 4 studies, 252 participants; very low-certainty evidence). However, for FEV1 % of predicted, an improvement was observed in favour of the breathing exercise group (MD 6.88%, 95% CI 5.03 to 8.73; five studies, 618 participants). Breathing exercises versus asthma education For quality of life, one study measuring AQLQ was inconclusive up to three months (MD 0.04, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.34; 1 study, 183 participants). When assessed from four to six months, the results favoured breathing exercises (MD 0.38, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.68; 1 study, 183 participants). Hyperventilation symptoms measured by the Nijmegen Questionnaire were inconclusive up to three months (MD -1.24, 95% CI -3.23 to 0.75; 1 study, 183 participants), but favoured breathing exercises from four to six months (MD -3.16, 95% CI -5.35 to -0.97; 1 study, 183 participants).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Breathing exercises may have some positive effects on quality of life, hyperventilation symptoms, and lung function. Due to some methodological differences among included studies and studies with poor methodology, the quality of evidence for the measured outcomes ranged from moderate to very low certainty according to GRADE criteria. In addition, further studies including full descriptions of treatment methods and outcome measurements are required.