Comparing the effects of smartphone-based and face-to-face pulmonary rehabilitation education on caregiver burden and quality of life among the family caregivers of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized controlled field trial

The Effects of Digital Health Interventions for Pulmonary Rehabilitation in People with COPD: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background and Objectives: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is the third most common cause of death globally. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programmes are important to reduce COPD symptoms and improve the quality of life of people with COPD. Digital health interventions have recently been adopted in PR programmes, which allow people with COPD to participate in such programmes with low barriers. The aim of this study is to review and discuss the reported effects of digital health interventions on PR outcomes in people with COPD. Materials and Methods: To achieve the study goals, a systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed (MEDLINE), CINAHL, AMED, SPORTDiscus and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database. Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) were included if they met specified criteria. Two reviewers independently checked titles, abstracts, and performed full-text screening and data extraction. The quality assessment and risk of bias were performed in accordance with the PEDRO scale and Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2, respectively. Results: Thirteen RCTs were included in this systematic review with 1525 participants with COPD. This systematic review showed the potential positive effect of digital health PR on the exercise capacity-measured by 6- and 12-min walking tests, pulmonary function, dyspnoea and health-related quality of life. There was no evidence for advantages of digital health PR in the improvement of anxiety, depression, and self-efficacy. Conclusions: Digital health PR is more effective than traditional PR in improving the pulmonary and physical outcomes for people with COPD, but there was no difference between the two PR programmes in improving the psychosocial outcomes. The certainty of the findings of this review is affected by the small number of included studies.

Effectiveness of a supportive care program via a smartphone application on the quality of life and care burden among family caregivers of patients with major depressive disorder: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The majority of patients with major depressive disorder require care that has generally affected caregivers' lives. Providing care could cause negative experiences as a care burden and deteriorate quality of life. However, there is a lack of evidence about caregiver training-based informatics and its impact on the caregiver's life.

METHODS

This experimental study was carried out in Mashhad, Iran. A total of 60 primary family caregivers of patients with major depressive disorder were included in the study between February and July 2021. The quadruple block randomization method was used to allocate the participants into control and intervention groups. In the intervention group, family caregivers used the application with weekly phone calls for one month. The app contains the most important points of patient care and has the possibility of communicating with the nurse. The Novak and Guest Care Burden Inventory and the short form of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire were completed before and after the intervention. Data analysis was performed using chi-squared tests, independent sample t tests, and analysis of covariance.

RESULTS

At baseline, the mean scores of care burden and quality of life were homogeneous between the two groups. After the intervention, the mean scores of care burden and quality of life were significantly reduced and improved in the intervention group compared with the control group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Using the application with the ability to communicate with the caregiver, along with educational support, helps to strengthen the relationship between the family caregiver and the nurse. Despite the effectiveness of the present intervention, before including this form of implementation of support in care programs, it is necessary to evaluate its other positive aspects in future studies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT), IRCT20210202050222N1. Registered on 05/02/2022.

Rescue analgesia with serratus anterior plane block improved pain relief after thoracic surgery

BACKGROUND

Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is frequently associated with substantial postoperative pain, which may lead to hypopnea. Rescue analgesia using opioids has adverse effects. We aimed to evaluate the effects of rescue analgesia with serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) on moderate-to-severe pain and oxygenation in patients undergoing VATS.

METHODS

Eighty patients undergoing VATS and reporting a numeric rating scale (NRS, ranging from 0-10) score of cough pain ≥4 on the first postoperative day were randomized to receive either sufentanil or SAPB for rescue analgesia. The primary outcome was the degree of relief in cough pain 30 min after rescue analgesia. Arterial oxygen pressure (PaO2), opioid consumption after rescue analgesia and the incidence of chronic pain were also assessed.

RESULTS

The NRS scores were significantly reduced after rescue analgesia in both groups (Ppaired <0.001). Notably, the degree of relief in cough pain was significantly higher in the SAPB group than that in the sufentanil group (medians [interquartiles]: -3 [-4, -2] vs. -2 [-3, -1], P<0.001). Moreover, patients receiving SAPB exhibited significantly higher PaO2 than those before receiving rescue analgesia (Ppaired=0.007). However, there were no significant differences in the PaO2 before and after receiving rescue analgesia in the sufentanil group. No significant differences in opioid consumption or the incidence of chronic pain were observed between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Rescue analgesia with SAPB on the first postoperative day had a greater effect on pain relief and oxygenation after VATS. However, its long-term effect on chronic pain requires further research.