1
|
Mannix J, Duke H, Almajnooni A, Ongkeko M. Imaging the Male Breast: Gynecomastia, Male Breast Cancer, and Beyond. Radiographics 2024; 44:e230181. [PMID: 38752766 DOI: 10.1148/rg.230181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2024]
Abstract
The number of men undergoing breast imaging has increased in recent years, according to some reports. Most male breast concerns are related to benign causes, most commonly gynecomastia. The range of abnormalities typically encountered in the male breast is less broad than that encountered in women, given that lobule formation rarely occurs in men. Other benign causes of male breast palpable abnormalities with characteristic imaging findings include lipomas, sebaceous or epidermal inclusion cysts, and intramammary lymph nodes. Male breast cancer (MBC) is rare, representing up to 1% of breast cancer cases, but some data indicate that its incidence is increasing. MBC demonstrates some clinical features that overlap with those of gynecomastia, including a propensity for the subareolar breast. Men with breast cancer tend to present at a later stage than do women. MBC typically has similar imaging features to those of female breast cancer, often characterized by an irregular mass that may have associated calcifications. Occasionally, however, MBC has a benign-appearing imaging phenotype, with an oval shape and circumscribed margins, and therefore most solid breast masses in men require tissue diagnosis. Histopathologic evaluation may alternatively reveal other benign breast masses found in men, including papillomas, myofibroblastomas, and hemangiomas. Radiologists must be familiar with the breadth of male breast abnormalities to meet the rising challenge of caring for these patients. ©RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaimee Mannix
- From the Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Section, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (J.M., H.D.) and Department of Pathology (A.A., M.O.), Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Heather Duke
- From the Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Section, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (J.M., H.D.) and Department of Pathology (A.A., M.O.), Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Abdullah Almajnooni
- From the Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Section, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (J.M., H.D.) and Department of Pathology (A.A., M.O.), Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Martin Ongkeko
- From the Department of Radiology, Breast Imaging Section, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (J.M., H.D.) and Department of Pathology (A.A., M.O.), Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, Campus Box 8131, St. Louis, MO 63110
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nicosia L, Mariano L, Bozzini AC, Pesapane F, Bagnardi V, Frassoni S, Oriecuia C, Dominelli V, Latronico A, Palma S, Venturini M, Fontana F, Priolo F, Abiuso I, Sangalli C, Cassano E. Radiological Features of Male Breast Neoplasms: How to Improve the Management of a Rare Disease. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:104. [PMID: 38201413 PMCID: PMC10795707 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14010104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Revised: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
The primary aim of our study was to assess the main mammographic and ultrasonographic features of invasive male breast malignancies. The secondary aim was to evaluate whether a specific radiological presentation would be associated with a worse receptor profile. Radiological images (mammography and/or ultrasound) of all patients who underwent surgery for male invasive breast cancer in our institution between 2008 and 2023 were retrospectively analyzed by two breast radiologists in consensus. All significant features of radiological presentation known in the literature were re-evaluated. Fifty-six patients were selected. The mean age at surgery of patients was 69 years (range: 35-81); in 82% of cases (46 patients), the histologic outcome was invasive ductal carcinoma. A total of 28 out of 56 (50%) patients had preoperative mammography; in 9/28 cases (32%), we found a mass with microcalcifications on mammography. The mass presented high density in 25 out of 28 patients (89%); the mass showed irregular margins in 15/28 (54%) cases. A total of 46 out of 56 patients had preoperative ultrasounds. The lesion showed a solid mass in 41/46 (89%) cases. In 5/46 patients (11%), the lesion was a mass with a mixed (partly liquid-partly solid) structure. We did not find any statistically significant correlation between major types of radiological presentation and tumor receptor arrangement. Knowledge of the main radiologic presentation patterns of malignant male breast neoplasm can help better manage this type of disease, which is rare but whose incidence is increasing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Nicosia
- Breast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (L.M.); (A.C.B.); (F.P.); (V.D.); (A.L.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Luciano Mariano
- Breast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (L.M.); (A.C.B.); (F.P.); (V.D.); (A.L.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Anna Carla Bozzini
- Breast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (L.M.); (A.C.B.); (F.P.); (V.D.); (A.L.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Filippo Pesapane
- Breast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (L.M.); (A.C.B.); (F.P.); (V.D.); (A.L.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Vincenzo Bagnardi
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (V.B.); (S.F.)
| | - Samuele Frassoni
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (V.B.); (S.F.)
| | - Chiara Oriecuia
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, 25121 Brescia, Italy;
- Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, 25121 Brescia, Italy
| | - Valeria Dominelli
- Breast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (L.M.); (A.C.B.); (F.P.); (V.D.); (A.L.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Antuono Latronico
- Breast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (L.M.); (A.C.B.); (F.P.); (V.D.); (A.L.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Simone Palma
- Department of Bioimaging, Radiation Oncology and Hematology, UOC of Radiologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy;
| | - Massimo Venturini
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Insubria, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, 21100 Varese, Italy; (M.V.); (F.F.)
| | - Federico Fontana
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Insubria, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, 21100 Varese, Italy; (M.V.); (F.F.)
| | - Francesca Priolo
- Breast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (L.M.); (A.C.B.); (F.P.); (V.D.); (A.L.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
| | - Ida Abiuso
- Radiology Department, Università degli Studi di Torino, 10129 Turin, Italy;
| | - Claudia Sangalli
- Data Management, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Enrico Cassano
- Breast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (L.M.); (A.C.B.); (F.P.); (V.D.); (A.L.); (F.P.); (E.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
D’Angelo A, Portaluri A, Caprini F, Sofia C, Ferrara F, Condorelli E, Iaccarino L, Catanzariti F, Mancino M, Trombadori CML, Belli P, Marino MA. Male Breast: A Review of the Literature and Current State of the Art of Diagnostic Imaging Work-Up. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:3620. [PMID: 38132204 PMCID: PMC10743117 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13243620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Pathological conditions affecting the male breast (MB) share some similarities with those found in women, while others are specific to men. The first part of this review provides an overview of MB disorders, exploring the most common types of MB diseases. The second part then emphasizes the state-of-the-art approaches proposed in the literature for screening and follow-up with MB cancer patients, which highlights the importance of tailored strategies for diagnosis, follow-up, and identifying high-risk populations. Considering the increasing attention in recent years on the topic, transgender individuals are also included in this review. Together with the MB, it is an understudied category thus far. This review aims to raise awareness among radiologists that MBs should be approached differently from female breasts, contributing to the advancement of medical knowledge, improving patient outcomes, and promoting early detection of MB disorders. The review also provides an update on breast cancer and screening in the transgender population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna D’Angelo
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Haematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.C.); (F.F.); (L.I.); (M.M.); (C.M.L.T.); (P.B.)
| | - Antonio Portaluri
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Morphologic and Functional Imaging, AOU G. Martino, University of Messina, 98100 Messina, Italy; (A.P.); (C.S.); (E.C.); (F.C.); (M.A.M.)
| | - Flavia Caprini
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Haematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.C.); (F.F.); (L.I.); (M.M.); (C.M.L.T.); (P.B.)
| | - Carmelo Sofia
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Morphologic and Functional Imaging, AOU G. Martino, University of Messina, 98100 Messina, Italy; (A.P.); (C.S.); (E.C.); (F.C.); (M.A.M.)
| | - Francesca Ferrara
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Haematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.C.); (F.F.); (L.I.); (M.M.); (C.M.L.T.); (P.B.)
| | - Elvira Condorelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Morphologic and Functional Imaging, AOU G. Martino, University of Messina, 98100 Messina, Italy; (A.P.); (C.S.); (E.C.); (F.C.); (M.A.M.)
| | - Ludovica Iaccarino
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Haematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.C.); (F.F.); (L.I.); (M.M.); (C.M.L.T.); (P.B.)
| | - Francesca Catanzariti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Morphologic and Functional Imaging, AOU G. Martino, University of Messina, 98100 Messina, Italy; (A.P.); (C.S.); (E.C.); (F.C.); (M.A.M.)
| | - Matteo Mancino
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Haematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.C.); (F.F.); (L.I.); (M.M.); (C.M.L.T.); (P.B.)
| | - Charlotte M. L. Trombadori
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Haematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.C.); (F.F.); (L.I.); (M.M.); (C.M.L.T.); (P.B.)
| | - Paolo Belli
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Haematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (F.C.); (F.F.); (L.I.); (M.M.); (C.M.L.T.); (P.B.)
| | - Maria Adele Marino
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Morphologic and Functional Imaging, AOU G. Martino, University of Messina, 98100 Messina, Italy; (A.P.); (C.S.); (E.C.); (F.C.); (M.A.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
An Update on the General Features of Breast Cancer in Male Patients—A Literature Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12071554. [PMID: 35885460 PMCID: PMC9323942 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12071554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Revised: 06/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Male breast cancers are uncommon, as men account for less than 1 percent of all breast carcinomas. Among the predisposing risk factors for male breast cancer, the following appear to be significant: (a) breast/chest radiation exposure, (b) estrogen use, diseases associated with hyper-estrogenism, such as cirrhosis or Klinefelter syndrome, and (c) family health history. Furthermore, there are clear familial tendencies, with a higher incidence among men who have a large number of female relatives with breast cancer and (d) major inheritance susceptibility. Moreover, in families with BRCA mutations, there is an increased risk of male breast cancer, although the risk appears to be greater with inherited BRCA2 mutations than with inherited BRCA1 mutations. Due to diagnostic delays, male breast cancer is more likely to present at an advanced stage. A core biopsy or a fine needle aspiration must be performed to confirm suspicious findings. Infiltrating ductal cancer is the most prevalent form of male breast cancer, while invasive lobular carcinoma is extremely uncommon. Male breast cancer is almost always positive for hormone receptors. A worse prognosis is associated with a more advanced stage at diagnosis for men with breast cancer. Randomized controlled trials which recruit both female and male patients should be developed in order to gain more consistent data on the optimal clinical approach.
Collapse
|
5
|
Yoon IN, Cha ES, Kim JH, Lee JE, Chung J. Bladder Cancer Metastasis to the Breast in a Male Patient: Imaging Findings on Mammography and Ultrasonography. TAEHAN YONGSANG UIHAKHOE CHI 2022; 83:687-692. [PMID: 36238522 PMCID: PMC9514537 DOI: 10.3348/jksr.2021.0070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Revised: 06/04/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Male breast cancer is rare, accounting for approximately 1% of breast cancers. Metastasis from extra-mammary malignancy to the breast in men is extremely rare. The most common primary tumors that metastasize to the breast in male are prostate, lung, stomach, colorectal cancer, melanoma, and sarcoma. To our knowledge, only a few cases of bladder cancer presenting with metastasis to the male breast have been reported, and metastasis with infiltration rather than mass is extremely rare. We report imaging findings on mammography and ultrasonography in a 59-year-old male with bladder cancer metastatic to the breast.
Collapse
|
6
|
Yin L, Agyekum EA, Zhang Q, Wu T, Qian X. Gynecomastia with rare granulomatous lobular mastitis: a case report and literature review. J Int Med Res 2022; 50:3000605221075815. [PMID: 35098766 PMCID: PMC8811439 DOI: 10.1177/03000605221075815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
This study was performed to describe a rare case of granulomatous lobular mastitis (GLM) that was successfully treated with bromocriptine in a male patient with gynecomastia and hyperprolactinemia. A 20-year-old man presented with a 1-year history of breast enlargement and galactorrhea. Physical examination revealed bilateral breast enlargement, porous discharge, and a 3-cm left breast lump in the 10-o’clock quadrant. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain showed a 1.2-mm pituitary tumor. Laboratory analysis revealed hyperprolactinemia with low serum testosterone and elevated prolactin and estradiol levels. The lump in the left breast was examined by ultrasonography and mammography, and a core needle biopsy revealed chronic inflammation. The patient’s galactorrhea and breast lump disappeared after 3 months of treatment with bromocriptine at 2.5 mg once a day. His serum prolactin level also normalized. Following a review of this case, the patient was diagnosed with gynecomastia with hyperprolactinemia complicated by rare GLM. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of concurrent gynecomastia and GLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liang Yin
- Department of Breast Surgery, Jiangsu University Affiliated People’s Hospital, Zhenjiang, China
| | - Enock Adjei Agyekum
- Department of Ultrasound, Jiangsu University Affiliated People’s Hospital, Zhenjiang, China
| | - Qing Zhang
- Department of Ultrasound, Jiangsu University Affiliated People’s Hospital, Zhenjiang, China
| | - Ting Wu
- Department of Pathology, Jiangsu University Affiliated People’s Hospital, Zhenjiang, China
| | - Xiaoqin Qian
- Department of Ultrasound, Jiangsu University Affiliated People’s Hospital, Zhenjiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Restrepo R, Cervantes LF, Swirsky AM, Diaz A. Breast development in pediatric patients from birth to puberty: physiology, pathology and imaging correlation. Pediatr Radiol 2021; 51:1959-1969. [PMID: 34236480 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-021-05099-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Revised: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/02/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Breast tissue undergoes a series of changes from birth to puberty. The majority of the changes are transient, related to physiological hormonal changes. Although the breast is identical in both sexes at birth, its histology and development will eventually differ. It is important for radiologists to have a basic understanding of endocrinological changes and appearance on imaging to avoid potential pitfalls, particularly on ultrasound, which is the primary modality used to evaluate the breast.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo Restrepo
- Department of Radiology, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, 3100 SW 62nd Ave., Miami, FL, 33155, USA.
| | - Luisa F Cervantes
- Department of Radiology, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, 3100 SW 62nd Ave., Miami, FL, 33155, USA
| | | | - Alejandro Diaz
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Salemis NS. Benign cyst of the male breast. An exceedingly rare entity that may pose a diagnostic dilemma. Management and literature review. Breast Dis 2021; 40:207-211. [PMID: 33749635 DOI: 10.3233/bd-201064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Cysts represent the most common cause of a breast mass in women. On the contrary, in men, the presence of a benign apocrine cyst is an exceedingly rare occurrence, with only a few cases reported in the literature. We describe herein a case of benign apocrine breast cyst without concurrent gynecomastia in a 41-year-old male. Diagnostic evaluation and management are discussed, along with a review of the literature. Given the extreme rarity of benign breast cysts in males, a thorough investigation is essential in male patients presenting with cystic breast lesions. Diagnostic breast imaging may be challenging. Surgical resection of the cyst should be considered in the presence of atypical imaging features to exclude underlying malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaos S Salemis
- Breast Cancer Surgery Unit, Army General Hospital, Athens, Greece.,IASO Women's Hospital, Athens, Greece.,IASO Thessalias Hospital, Larissa, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pistolese CA, Perretta T, Claroni G, Anemona L, Servadei F, Collura A, Censi M, Materazzo M, Pellicciaro M, Lamacchia F, Vanni G. A Prospective Evaluation of Tru-Cut Biopsy and Fine-needle Aspiration Cytology in Male Breast Cancer Detection. In Vivo 2021; 34:3431-3439. [PMID: 33144451 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Revised: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Male breast-cancer (MBC) is often diagnosed late. Our purpose was to evaluate fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) versus Tru-Cut biopsy (TCNB) in MBC diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS Men with suspicious breast lesions were prospectively enrolled; 54 met the inclusion criteria and underwent FNAC and TCNB. FNAC, TCNB and gold-standard results were compared. RESULTS Unsatisfactory results were 11.1% after FNAC and none after TCNB (p=0.027). After gold-standard evaluation, the diagnosis of FNAC and TCNB was confirmed, respectively, in 63.0% and 98.1% and changed in 37.0% and 1.9% (p<0.001). The malignancy rate after FNAC, TCNB and surgery were, respectively, 25.9%, 33.3% and 35.1% (FNAC vs. TCNB p=0.5276, FNAC vs. surgery p=0.404; TCNB vs. surgery p=1). Among invasive carcinomas, 93.8% were identified by FNAC vs. 87.5% by TCNB (p=1); all ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were detected after TCNB and none after FNAC (p=0.1). CONCLUSION FNAC leads to a significantly higher number of inadequate samplings and seems to be subject to increased DCIS misdiagnoses. TCNB correlated better to the final histological report.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Adriana Pistolese
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Policlinico Tor Vergata (PTV) University, Rome, Italy
| | - Tommaso Perretta
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Policlinico Tor Vergata (PTV) University, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Claroni
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Policlinico Tor Vergata (PTV) University, Rome, Italy
| | - Lucia Anemona
- Anatomic Pathology, Department of Experimental Medicine, Policlinico Tor Vergata (PTV) University, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Servadei
- Anatomic Pathology, Department of Experimental Medicine, Policlinico Tor Vergata (PTV) University, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Collura
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Policlinico Tor Vergata (PTV) University, Rome, Italy
| | - Michela Censi
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Policlinico Tor Vergata (PTV) University, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Materazzo
- Breast Unit-Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata (PTV) University, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Pellicciaro
- Breast Unit-Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata (PTV) University, Rome, Italy
| | - Feliciana Lamacchia
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Policlinico Tor Vergata (PTV) University, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianluca Vanni
- Breast Unit-Department of Surgical Science, Policlinico Tor Vergata (PTV) University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Billa E, Kanakis GA, Goulis DG. Imaging in gynecomastia. Andrology 2021; 9:1444-1456. [PMID: 34033252 DOI: 10.1111/andr.13051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2021] [Revised: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gynecomastia (GM) is the benign proliferation of glandular tissue in the male breast. It is a common condition, which may occur physiologically and shows three age peaks during a male's lifespan: infancy, puberty, and senescence. An underlying pathology may be revealed in 45%-50% of adult men with GM, such as aggravating medications, systemic diseases, obesity, endocrinopathies, or malignancy. OBJECTIVE To discuss the role of imaging in the evaluation of GM and its contribution to therapeutic decision-making. MATERIALS/METHODS The current literature was reviewed through PubMed, Scopus, and CENTRAL electronic databases to identify the best available evidence concerning imaging modalities in patients with GM. RESULTS Most male breast lesions can be diagnosed on clinical grounds; however, in certain cases, when physical examination is inconclusive, imaging may be helpful. DISCUSSION The main purpose of evaluating a patient with GM is to establish the diagnosis and differentiate true GM from pseudogynecomastia, exclude breast cancer, and detect the possible cause. GM is seen in mammography as a subareolar opacity and three mammographic patterns of GM are described: nodular, dendritic, and diffuse, corresponding to florid GM of early onset, fibrous persistent GM, and GM due to exogenous estrogen administration, respectively. In ultrasound (US), florid GM is depicted as a disk-shaped, hypoechoic area underlying the areola, whereas echogenicity of the lesions increases as fibrosis develops. Data on the use of MRI in the evaluation of the male breast and GM are still limited. Imaging findings can be classified according to the BIRADS (breast imaging reporting and data system) based on their malignant potential. CONCLUSION Both mammography and US are sensitive and specific to diagnose GM and distinguish it from breast cancer. When clinical findings are suggestive of malignancy or imaging findings are inconclusive, a histological confirmation should be sought.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evangelia Billa
- Unit of Reproductive Endocrinology, First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - George A Kanakis
- Unit of Reproductive Endocrinology, First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.,Department of Endocrinology, Athens Naval and Veteran Affairs Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios G Goulis
- Unit of Reproductive Endocrinology, First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yavaş Çelik M. The effect of staying at home due to COVID-19 outbreak on nursing students' life satisfaction and social competencies. Perspect Psychiatr Care 2021; 57:655-659. [PMID: 32770544 PMCID: PMC7436535 DOI: 10.1111/ppc.12590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In this study, it was aimed to investigate the life satisfaction and social competencies of the nursing students. DESIGN AND METHOD Our sample was composed of a nursing group with voluntary participation, internet network connection, and social media use. FINDINGS It was found that there was a significant difference between the mean scores of the students in terms of compliance to stay at home and a positive status of an acquaintance (COVID-19) (P %3C .01), and there was a significant difference between the students' mean scores at home (P = .01) (P %3C .01). PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS As a result, it was determined that the students were adapted to stay at home, the precautions taken in the epidemic were insufficient and the social competencies of the students were associated only with adaptation to stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melike Yavaş Çelik
- Department of Nursing, Yusuf Şerefoğlu Faculty of Health Sciences, Kilis 7 Aralık University, Kilis, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|