1
|
陶 文, 文 进, 李 为. [Utilizing Patient Navigation Model in the Whole-Process Management of Lung Cancer in the Context of Medical Consortiums in China: Insights and Reflections]. SICHUAN DA XUE XUE BAO. YI XUE BAN = JOURNAL OF SICHUAN UNIVERSITY. MEDICAL SCIENCE EDITION 2023; 54:1288-1293. [PMID: 38162072 PMCID: PMC10752780 DOI: 10.12182/20231160301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
Patient navigation is an effective intervention measure to promote the integration of medical systems and services. By providing individualized, coordinated, and continuous care, patient navigation offers a way to address the problem of fragmented services across institutions and levels of care in the whole-process management of lung cancer, providing assistance to patients with complex healthcare needs. Herein, we reviewed the origin, the development, the models, and the application status of patient navigation in China and other countries. We also analyzed the considerations regarding introducing patient navigation in the whole-process management of lung cancer against the background of medical consortiums in China, discussing why patient navigation should be introduced, how to introduce patient navigation, as well as potential challenges and coping strategies. Patient navigation meets the current needs for equitable, accessible, systematic, continuous, and integrated prevention and treatment services for chronic diseases in the context of the Healthy China Strategy. It helps fill the gaps in the continuity and coordination of whole-process management of lung cancer patients in the context of medical consortiums. However, introducing patient navigation in medical consortiums involving multiple institutions and levels of care may face challenges, including incompatibility between the health information systems of different institutions, poor cross-institutional collaboration and communication, and limited resources. Further improvement is needed in medical informatization, coordination and communication mechanisms, and benefit distribution mechanisms within the medical consortiums. In this paper, we intend to provide insights and suggestions for developing patient navigation models that suit China's local characteristics and for promoting the implementation and development of whole-process management of lung cancer in the context of the medical consortium system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- 文娟 陶
- 四川大学华西医院 医院管理研究所 (成都 610041)Institute of Hospital Management, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - 进 文
- 四川大学华西医院 医院管理研究所 (成都 610041)Institute of Hospital Management, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - 为民 李
- 四川大学华西医院 医院管理研究所 (成都 610041)Institute of Hospital Management, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
- 四川大学华西医院 院长办公室 (成都 610041)President's Office, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Haggerty J, Smithman MA, Beaulieu C, Breton M, Dionne É, Lewis V. Telephone outreach by volunteer navigators: a theory-based evaluation of an intervention to improve access to appropriate primary care. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2023; 24:161. [PMID: 37605175 PMCID: PMC10441746 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-023-02096-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A pilot intervention in a participatory research programme in Québec, Canada, used telephone outreach by volunteer patient navigators to help unattached persons from deprived neighbourhoods attach successfully to a family doctor newly-assigned to them from a centralized waiting list. According to our theory-based program logic model we evaluated the extent to which the volunteer navigator outreach helped patients reach and engage with their newly-assigned primary care team, have a positive healthcare experience, develop an enduring doctor-patient relationship, and reduce forgone care and emergency room use. METHOD For the mixed-method evaluation, indicators were developed for all domains in the logic model and measured in a telephone-administered patient survey at baseline and three months later to determine if there was a significant difference. Interviews with a subsample of 13 survey respondents explored the mechanisms and nuances of intended effects. RESULTS Five active volunteers provided the service to 108 persons, of whom 60 agreed to participate in the evaluation. All surveyed participants attended the first visit, where 90% attached successfully to the new doctor. Indicators of abilities to access healthcare increased statistically significantly as did ability to explain health needs to professionals. The telephone outreach predisposed patients to have a positive first visit and have trust in their new care team, establishing a basis for an enduring relationship. Patient-reported access difficulties, forgone care and use of hospital emergency rooms decreased dramatically after patients attached to their new doctors. CONCLUSIONS As per the logic model, telephone outreach by volunteer navigators significantly increased patients' abilities to seek, reach and engage with care and helped them attach successfully to newly-assigned family doctors. This light-touch intervention may have promise to achieve of the intended policy goals for the centralized waiting list to increase population access to appropriate primary care and reduce forgone care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeannie Haggerty
- Department of Family Medicine, McGill Research Chair in Family & Community Medicine at St. Mary's, McGill University, St. Mary's Research Centre, Montreal, Canada.
- IMPACT Team, St. Mary's Research Centre, 3830 Av. Jean-Brillant Ave, Pavillon Hayes, #4720, Montréal, Québec, H3T 1M5, Canada.
- St. Mary's Research Centre, 3830 Av. Jean-Brillant Ave, Pavillon Hayes, Montréal, Québec, H3T 1M5, Canada.
| | - Mélanie-Ann Smithman
- Université de Sherbrooke, Campus Longueuil, Centre de Recherche Charles-Le Moyne Sur Les Innovations en Santé, 150, Place Charles-Le Moyne C. P. 200, Longueuil, Québec, J4K 0A8, Canada
| | - Christine Beaulieu
- St. Mary's Research Centre, 3830 Av. Jean-Brillant Ave, Pavillon Hayes, Montréal, Québec, H3T 1M5, Canada
- Université de Sherbrooke, Campus Longueuil, Centre de Recherche Charles-Le Moyne Sur Les Innovations en Santé, 150, Place Charles-Le Moyne C. P. 200, Longueuil, Québec, J4K 0A8, Canada
| | - Mylaine Breton
- IMPACT Team, St. Mary's Research Centre, 3830 Av. Jean-Brillant Ave, Pavillon Hayes, #4720, Montréal, Québec, H3T 1M5, Canada
- Université de Sherbrooke, Campus Longueuil, Centre de Recherche Charles-Le Moyne Sur Les Innovations en Santé, 150, Place Charles-Le Moyne C. P. 200, Longueuil, Québec, J4K 0A8, Canada
- Faculté de Médecine Et Des Sciences de La Santé, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001 12 Ave N Immeuble X1, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1H 5N4, Canada
| | - Émilie Dionne
- IMPACT Team, St. Mary's Research Centre, 3830 Av. Jean-Brillant Ave, Pavillon Hayes, #4720, Montréal, Québec, H3T 1M5, Canada
- St. Mary's Research Centre, 3830 Av. Jean-Brillant Ave, Pavillon Hayes, Montréal, Québec, H3T 1M5, Canada
- VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Université Laval, 2480, Chemin de La Canardière, Québec, Québec, G1J 2G1, Canada
| | - Virginia Lewis
- IMPACT Team, St. Mary's Research Centre, 3830 Av. Jean-Brillant Ave, Pavillon Hayes, #4720, Montréal, Québec, H3T 1M5, Canada
- Australian Institute for Primary Care & Ageing, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, 3086, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Taha A, Iman Y, Hingwala J, Askin N, Mysore P, Rigatto C, Bohm C, Komenda P, Tangri N, Collister D. Patient Navigators for CKD and Kidney Failure: A Systematic Review. Kidney Med 2022; 4:100540. [PMID: 36185707 PMCID: PMC9516458 DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2022.100540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Rationale & Objective To what degree and how patient navigators improve clinical outcomes for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and kidney failure is uncertain. We performed a systematic review to summarize patient navigator program design, evidence, and implementation in kidney disease. Study Design A search strategy was developed for randomized controlled trials and observational studies that evaluated the impact of navigators on outcomes in the setting of CKD and kidney failure. Articles were identified from various databases. Two reviewers independently screened the articles and identified those meeting the inclusion criteria. Setting & Participants Patients with CKD or kidney failure (in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis, or kidney transplantation). Selection Criteria for Studies Studies that compared patient navigators with a control, without limits on size, duration, setting, or language. Studies focusing solely on patient education were excluded. Data Extraction Data were abstracted from full texts and risk of bias was assessed. Analytical Approach No meta-analysis was performed. Results Of 3,371 citations, 17 articles met the inclusion criteria including 14 original studies. Navigators came from various healthcare backgrounds including nursing (n=6), social worker (n=2), medical interpreter (n=1), research (n=1), and also included kidney transplant recipients (n=2) and non-medical individuals (n=2). Navigators focused mostly on education (n=9) and support (n = 6). Navigators were used for patients with CKD (n=5), peritoneal dialysis (n=2), in-center hemodialysis (n=4), kidney transplantation (n=2), but not home hemodialysis. Navigators improved transplant workup and listing, peritoneal dialysis utilization, and patient knowledge. Limitations Many studies did not show benefits across other outcomes, were at a high risk of bias, and none reported cost-effectiveness or patient-reported experience measures. Conclusions Navigators improve some health outcomes for CKD but there was heterogeneity in their structure and function. High-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate navigator program efficacy and cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Taha
- Chronic Disease Innovation Center, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Yasmin Iman
- Chronic Disease Innovation Center, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Jay Hingwala
- Chronic Disease Innovation Center, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Section of Nephrology, University of Manitoba, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Nicole Askin
- Libraries, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Priyanka Mysore
- Chronic Disease Innovation Center, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Section of Nephrology, University of Manitoba, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Claudio Rigatto
- Chronic Disease Innovation Center, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Section of Nephrology, University of Manitoba, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Clara Bohm
- Chronic Disease Innovation Center, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Section of Nephrology, University of Manitoba, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Paul Komenda
- Chronic Disease Innovation Center, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Section of Nephrology, University of Manitoba, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Navdeep Tangri
- Chronic Disease Innovation Center, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Section of Nephrology, University of Manitoba, Manitoba, Canada
| | - David Collister
- Chronic Disease Innovation Center, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Section of Nephrology, University of Manitoba, Manitoba, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fügemann H, Goerling U, Gödde K, Desch AK, Müller-Nordhorn J, Mauckisch V, Siegerink B, Rieckmann N, Holmberg C. What do people with lung cancer and stroke expect from patient navigation? A qualitative study in Germany. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e050601. [PMID: 34949615 PMCID: PMC8710862 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This qualitative study investigated patients' needs and wishes in relation to patient navigation. DESIGN A qualitative interview study was conducted. Participants were invited to take part in three in-depth interviews over a period of 6-12 months. Thematic analysis was used. SETTING Interviewees were sought in the Berlin metropolitan area of Germany in academic university hospitals, in rehabilitation clinics and through self-help organisations. PARTICIPANTS The sample consisted of individuals diagnosed with lung cancer (n=20) or stroke (n=20). RESULTS From the perspective of interviewees, patient navigators should function as consistent contact persons, present during the whole care trajectory. Their role would be to guide patients through an often confusing healthcare landscape, offering practical, advisory and emotional assistance corresponding to patients' needs. The study shows that-independent of the disease-participants had similar expectations and needs regarding support from navigators. CONCLUSION For chronic and complex diseases-as is the case with lung cancer and stroke-it appears less important for navigators to fulfil disease-specific tasks. Rather, they should ensure that patients' more general needs, in relation to social, practical and emotional support, are met in a way that suits their individual wishes. Following these results, patient navigation programmes might be designed to include generic elements, which should then be adapted to the infrastructure in a particular healthcare region and to the particularities of a specific healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hella Fügemann
- Institute of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg/Havel, Germany
| | - Ute Goerling
- Charité Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kathrin Gödde
- Institute of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anke Kristin Desch
- Institute of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg/Havel, Germany
| | | | - Verena Mauckisch
- Institute of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bob Siegerink
- Dept clinical epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Nina Rieckmann
- Institute of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christine Holmberg
- Institute of Public Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg/Havel, Germany
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Budde H, Williams GA, Winkelmann J, Pfirter L, Maier CB. The role of patient navigators in ambulatory care: overview of systematic reviews. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:1166. [PMID: 34706733 PMCID: PMC8555047 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07140-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient navigators have been introduced across various countries to enable timely access to healthcare services and to ensure completion of diagnosis and follow-up of care. There is an increasing evidence on the the role of patient navigation for patients and healthcare systems. The aim of this study was to analyse the evidence on patient navigation interventions in ambulatory care and to evaluate their effects on individuals and health system outcomes. METHODS An overview of reviews was conducted, following a prespecified protocol. All patients in ambulatory care or transitional care setting were included in this review as long as it was related to the role of patient navigators. The study analysed patient navigators covering a wide range of health professionals such as physicians, nurses, pharmacists, social workers and lay health workers or community-based workers with no or very limited training. Studies including patient-related measures and health system-related outcomes were eligible for inclusion. A rigorous search was performed in multiple data bases. After reaching a high inter-rater agreement of 0.86, title and abstract screening was independently performed. Of an initial 14,248 search results and an additional 62 articles identified through the snowballing approach, a total of 7159 hits were eligible for title/abstract screening. 679 articles were included for full-text screening. RESULTS Eleven systematic reviews were included covering various patient navigation intervention in cancer care, disease screening, transitional care and for various chronic conditions and multimorbidity. Nine systematic reviews primarily tailored services to ethnic minorities or other disadvantaged groups. Patient navigators performed tasks such as providing education and counselling, translations, home visits, outreach, scheduling of appointments and follow-up. Eight reviews identified positive outcomes in expanding access to care, in particular for vulnerable patient groups. Two reviews on patient navigation in transitional care reported improved patient outcomes, hospital readmission rates and mixed evidence on quality of life and emergency department visits. Two reviews demonstrated improved patient outcomes for persons with various chronic conditions and multimorbidity. CONCLUSIONS Patient navigators were shown to expand access to screenings and health services for vulnerable patients or population groups with chronic conditions who tend to underuse health services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Budde
- London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton St, London, WC2A 2AE, UK.
| | - Gemma A Williams
- European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK
| | - Juliane Winkelmann
- Department of Healthcare Management, Technische Universität Berlin, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623, Berlin, Germany
| | - Laura Pfirter
- Maecenata Institut für Philanthropie und Zivilgesellschaft in Berlin, Rungestr. 17, D-10179, Berlin, Germany
| | - Claudia B Maier
- Department of Healthcare Management, Technische Universität Berlin, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
|
7
|
Spencer M, Kemp N, Cruickshank V, Otten C, Nash R. An International Review to Characterize the Role, Responsibilities, and Optimal Setting for Health Literacy Mediators. Glob Pediatr Health 2021; 8:2333794X211025401. [PMID: 34212070 PMCID: PMC8216407 DOI: 10.1177/2333794x211025401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Health literacy is a critically important determinant of health and is influenced by access to supportive social networks and services. Global investment in education throughout the life course is required to support health literacy development. The aim of this review is to characterize the role, responsibilities, and the optimal setting for the emergent role of a Health Literacy Mediator (HLM). A scoping review of recent literature was conducted. The review revealed a lack of consensus on who should be teaching health literacy, and variability in confidence when teaching health literacy. Professionals reported facing barriers such as a lack of time, a lack of knowledge, and recognized that the health literacy needs of children worldwide are not being met. Further research into the role of HLM is required to determine who is best suited to this role and what their responsibilities will be to ensure consistent health literacy education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nenagh Kemp
- University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | | | | | - Rosie Nash
- University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| |
Collapse
|