1
|
Gallagher AM, O'Kane SM, Doherty LC, Faulkner M, McDermott G, Jago R, Lahart IM, Murphy MH, Carlin A. 'Including us, talking to us and creating a safe environment'-Youth patient and public involvement and the Walking In ScHools (WISH) Study: Lessons learned. Health Expect 2024; 27:e13885. [PMID: 37803967 PMCID: PMC10726144 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Revised: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Young people have the right to be informed and consulted about decisions affecting their lives. Patient and public involvement (PPI) ensures that research is carried out 'with' or 'by' young people rather than 'to', 'about' or 'for' them. The aim of this paper is to outline how youth PPI can be embedded within a physical activity intervention, reflect on the impact of PPI and provide recommendations for future PPI in a similar context. METHODS A Youth Advisory Group (YAG) was set up within the Walking In ScHools (WISH) Study to involve adolescent girls in the delivery, implementation and dissemination of a physical activity intervention targeted at adolescents. Schools invited pupils aged 12-14 years and 15-18 years to YAG meetings (n3, from 2019 to 2023). Participative methods were used to inform recruitment strategies and data collection methods for the WISH Study. RESULTS Across the three YAG meetings, n51 pupils from n8 schools were involved. Pupils enjoyed the YAG meetings, felt that their feedback was valued and considered the meetings a good way to get young people involved in research. The YAG advised on specific issues and although measuring impact was not the primary aim of the YAG meetings, over the course of the study there were many examples of the impact of PPI. Recruitment targets for the WISH Study were exceeded, the attrition rate was low and pupils were engaged in data collection. CONCLUSION Youth PPI is a developing field and there are few physical activity studies that report the PPI work undertaken. Within the WISH Study, three YAG meetings were held successfully, and the views of adolescent girls were central to the development of the study. Considering the specific issues that the YAG advised on (study recruitment, attrition and data collection), there was evidence of a positive impact of PPI. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Pupils from post-primary schools interested/participating in the WISH Study were invited to attend YAG meetings. YAG meetings were set up to consult adolescent girls on the delivery, implementation and dissemination of the WISH intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison M. Gallagher
- Nutrition Innovation Centre for Food and Health (NICHE), Biomedical Sciences Research InstituteUlster UniversityColeraineUK
| | - Sarah Maria O'Kane
- Centre for Exercise Medicine, Physical Activity and Health, Sports and Exercise Sciences Research InstituteUlster UniversityBelfastUK
- Institute of Nursing and Health ResearchUlster UniversityLondonderryUK
| | - Leanne C. Doherty
- Centre for Exercise Medicine, Physical Activity and Health, Sports and Exercise Sciences Research InstituteUlster UniversityBelfastUK
| | - Maria Faulkner
- Sports Lab North WestAtlantic Technological University DonegalLetterkennyIreland
| | - Gary McDermott
- Centre for Exercise Medicine, Physical Activity and Health, Sports and Exercise Sciences Research InstituteUlster UniversityBelfastUK
| | - Russell Jago
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical SchoolUniversity of BristolBristolUK
| | - Ian M. Lahart
- Faculty of Education, Health and WellbeingUniversity of WolverhamptonWalsallUK
| | - Marie H. Murphy
- Centre for Exercise Medicine, Physical Activity and Health, Sports and Exercise Sciences Research InstituteUlster UniversityBelfastUK
- Physical Activity for Health Research Centre (PHARC), Institute for Sport, Physical Education and Health SciencesUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | - Angela Carlin
- Centre for Exercise Medicine, Physical Activity and Health, Sports and Exercise Sciences Research InstituteUlster UniversityBelfastUK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Watson R, Burgess L, Sellars E, Crooks J, McGowan R, Diffey J, Naughton G, Carrington R, Lovelock C, Temple R, Creswell C, McMellon C. A qualitative study exploring the benefits of involving young people in mental health research. Health Expect 2023; 26:1491-1504. [PMID: 37073725 PMCID: PMC10349260 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION It is increasingly accepted that young people need to be centrally involved in research on issues that affect them. The aim of this study was to explore young people's perceptions of the benefits for them of being involved in mental health research and the processes that enabled these benefits. METHODS Qualitative interviews were conducted by co-researchers (young people with lived experience and/or interest in mental health) with 13 young people (aged 13-24 years) who had experience of being involved in mental health research when they were between 11 and 16 years of age. Reflective thematic analysis was used to identify important aspects of young people's experiences. RESULTS Four main themes were identified: (1) opportunity to have a meaningful impact, (2) opportunity to be part of a supportive community, (3) opportunity to learn and grow and (4) increasing opportunities for young people. CONCLUSION This study highlights young people's experiences of being involved in mental health research and identifies ways in which researchers can ensure that involvement opportunities bring benefits to both the young people and the research. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION This research was a response to issues raised by young people involved in research. The project was supported by co-researchers throughout, including design, data collection, analysis and write-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Watson
- Departments of Experimental Psychology and PsychiatryUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Lowrie Burgess
- Departments of Experimental Psychology and PsychiatryUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Elise Sellars
- Departments of Experimental Psychology and PsychiatryUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Jodie Crooks
- Young People's NetworkThe McPin FoundationLondonUK
| | - Rose McGowan
- Young People's NetworkThe McPin FoundationLondonUK
| | - James Diffey
- Young People's NetworkThe McPin FoundationLondonUK
| | | | | | - Cassie Lovelock
- Departments of Experimental Psychology and PsychiatryUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | | | - Cathy Creswell
- Departments of Experimental Psychology and PsychiatryUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vanderhout SM, Bhalla M, Van A, Fergusson DA, Potter BK, Karoly A, Ly V, Macarthur C. The Impact of Patient and Family Engagement in Child Health Research: A Scoping Review. J Pediatr 2023; 253:115-128. [PMID: 36179891 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.09.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Revised: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify impacts of patient and family engagement in child health research on the research process, research teams, and patient and family partners. STUDY DESIGN A scoping review was conducted using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases. English-language studies were included if they described ≥1 impact of patient and family engagement on child health research (age <18 years), researchers, or patient and family partners. Data were retrieved by 2 independent extractors. RESULTS Of the 7688 studies identified, 25 were included in our analysis. Impacts of patient and family engagement were mostly on the research process (n = 24 studies; 96%), 11 (44%) determined impacts on the research team, and 17 (68%) reported impacts on patient and family partners. Less than one-half (n = 11; 44%) had a primary purpose of determining the impact of patient engagement, and no study used a specific evaluation tool. CONCLUSIONS Patient and family engagement can strengthen the relevance and feasibility of research and empower researchers and patient partners. Measuring and reporting the impact of engagement is rare. Systematic and standardized evaluation of engagement is needed to understand how, when, and why to engage patients and families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shelley M Vanderhout
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Manav Bhalla
- Health Sciences Centre, University College Dublin School of Medicine, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Alicia Van
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dean A Fergusson
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Beth K Potter
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Valentina Ly
- University of Ottawa Library Services, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Colin Macarthur
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Involving Children in Health Literacy Research. CHILDREN (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 10:children10010023. [PMID: 36670574 PMCID: PMC9856879 DOI: 10.3390/children10010023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Revised: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Despite the volume and breadth of health literacy research related to children, children's involvement in that research is rare. Research with children is challenging, but the principles of involvement and engagement underpin all health promotion work, including health literacy. This commentary reflects on the process of setting up a Children's Advisory Group to consult on an institutional ethnography study of health literacy work from children's standpoint. The Children's Advisory Group contributed feedback on the study ethics and design and piloted methods for rapport-building and data collection, including livestreamed draw-and-describe and modified Interview to the Double. Consulting with the Children's Advisory Group highlighted the importance of listening to children and recognizing and valuing children's imaginative contributions to methods for involving children in health literacy research. Insights from this commentary can be used to foreground equity-focused approaches to future research and practice with children in the field of health literacy.
Collapse
|
5
|
Rouncefield-Swales A, Harris J, Carter B, Bray L, Bewley T, Martin R. Children and young people's contributions to public involvement and engagement activities in health-related research: A scoping review. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0252774. [PMID: 34106978 PMCID: PMC8189547 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Accepted: 05/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There has been an increasing interest in how children and young people can be involved in patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health research. However, relatively little robust evidence exists about which children and young people are reported as being involved or excluded from PPIE; the methods reported as being used to involve them in PPIE; and the reasons presented for their involvement in PPIE and what happens as a result. We performed a scoping review to identify, synthesise and present what is known from the literature about patient and public involvement and engagement activities with children and young people in health related research. METHODS Relevant studies were identified by searches in Scopus, Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane and PsychInfo databases, and hand checking of reference lists and grey literature. An adapted version of the Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public (GRIPP2) was used as a framework to collate the data. Two reviewers independently screened articles and decisions were consensually made. MAIN FINDINGS A total of 9805 references were identified (after duplicates were removed) through the literature search, of which 233 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. Forty studies published between 2000 and 2019 were included in the review. The review reveals ambiguities in the quality of reporting of PPIE with children with clear reporting on demographics and health conditions. The review found that children and young people were commonly involved in multiple stages of research but there was also significant variation in the level at which children and young people were involved in PPIE. Evaluation of the impact of children and young people's involvement in PPIE was limited. CONCLUSIONS Consultation, engagement and participation can all offer children and young people worthwhile ways of contributing to research with the level, purpose and impact of involvement determined by the children and young people themselves. However, careful decisions need to be made to ensure that it is suited to the context, setting and focus so that the desired PPIE impacts are achieved. Improvements should be made to the evaluation and reporting of PPIE in research. This will help researchers and funders to better understand the benefits, challenges and impact of PPIE with children and young people on health research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jane Harris
- Faculty of Health, Public Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Bernie Carter
- Faculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom
| | - Lucy Bray
- Faculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom
| | - Toni Bewley
- Faculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom
| | - Rachael Martin
- Faculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Postma L, Luchtenberg ML, Verhagen AAE, Maeckelberghe ELM. The attitudes of healthy children and researchers towards the challenges of involving children in research: an exploratory study. RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 2021; 7:30. [PMID: 33990230 PMCID: PMC8120777 DOI: 10.1186/s40900-021-00263-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2020] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A growing trend in research is to involve co-researchers. It is referred to as Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) and comprises three groups: the patients, the public, and the researchers. Like in adult public involvement, healthy children can also be considered as 'the public'. Paediatric patients and researchers experienced in conducting child-inclusive research are often asked about their attitudes towards the challenges they encounter. This is not the case for healthy children and researchers without such experience. Our aim was to investigate the attitudes of these children and researchers towards the challenges encountered during child-inclusive research. METHODS This was an exploratory study. We interviewed healthy children and adult researchers without prior experience in child-inclusive research. We recruited the children through a foundation for young researchers and the adult researchers from two hospitals, both in Groningen, the Netherlands. We audio recorded the interviews, and they were transcribed verbatim. We analysed the data using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS We interviewed five adult researchers and seven healthy children, aged 9 to 14 years. Both groups thought that it was best to involve children in paediatric research from as early a stage as possible. The children assumed that no prior training would be needed because they had already been trained at school. The researchers' attitudes varied regarding training children beforehand. Both groups thought that researchers did not need prior training on how to involve children if they worked with children on a daily basis. The children felt that recognition and a modest financial reward was appropriate. Adult researchers were cautious about rewarding the children. They feared it might render the children less intrinsically motivated. CONCLUSION Our study indicated that young and adult researchers have clear attitudes towards the challenges encountered during child-inclusive research. Young researchers could help adult researchers to find solutions to these challenges, even if they have no prior experience in child-inclusive research. Adult researchers who acknowledge the importance of child-inclusive research represent a significant step towards meaningful involvement of children. Our results imply that children could be involved in the decision-making process concerning the challenges encountered in child-inclusive research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Postma
- Wenckebach Institute for Education and Training, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713, GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Malou L Luchtenberg
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Beatrix Children's Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - A A Eduard Verhagen
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Beatrix Children's Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Els L M Maeckelberghe
- Wenckebach Institute for Education and Training, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713, GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cavens C, Imms C, Drake G, Garrity N, Wallen M. Perspectives of children and adolescents with cerebral palsy about involvement as research partners: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil 2021; 44:4293-4302. [PMID: 33779451 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1900927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Children and adolescents with cerebral palsy have diverse needs and often engage with healthcare services, including paediatric rehabilitation. Partnering with these children and adolescents on research projects to inform practice has the potential to ensure services continue to remain relevant and appropriate. This study aimed to identify what children and adolescents with cerebral palsy suggest are effective ways for researchers to involve them as partners in research. MATERIALS AND METHODS This qualitative study was guided by interpretive description. Children and adolescents with cerebral palsy between 8 and 18 years participated in semi-structured, activity-based focus groups or interviews. Verbatim transcripts were coded and analysed using thematic analysis. One member of the research team was a young woman with cerebral palsy. RESULTS Seventeen children and adolescents with cerebral palsy from NSW and Victoria (Australia) were involved. Participants were between 8 and 18 years (mean = 12 years), male (n = 11) and female (n = 6). Analysis identified four nested themes: "insider knowledge", "reasons for involvement", "roles in research" and "facilitating partnership". CONCLUSION This study identified perspectives of children and adolescents on their involvement as research partners, and considerations for researchers to facilitate involvement of children and adolescents with cerebral palsy as partners in research.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe commitment in healthcare to client-centred practice requires that consumers, including children and young people with cerebral palsy, have opportunities to influence the direction of research which impacts them.Children and young people with cerebral palsy are interested in research partnerships and motivated to be involved in various areas of research.Effective research partnerships with younger populations can be facilitated by researchers acknowledging a child or young person's expertise, and employing strategies relating to open communication, flexibility and support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Cavens
- School of Allied Health, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, Australia
| | - C Imms
- School of Allied Health, Australian Catholic University, Fitzroy, Australia
| | - G Drake
- School of Allied Health, Australian Catholic University, Strathfield, Australia
| | - N Garrity
- Consumer researcher with lived experience of disability
| | - M Wallen
- School of Allied Health, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
How do we know what works? Evaluating data on the extent and impact of young people’s involvement in English health research. RESEARCH FOR ALL 2020. [DOI: 10.14324/rfa.04.2.05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The case for children and young people’s involvement in health research has been well documented, but less attention has been paid to the experiences and impact of involving children and young people rather than adults. This paper explores these issues in relation to a project undertaken for the James Lind Initiative on the availability, quality and reliability of existing data on young people’s involvement in studies supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). The project found that there was no systematic way of getting reliable and comparable information about which young people are involved in health research in England, what form that involvement may have taken or the impacts of involvement. There is a need to better collate and disseminate evidence on young people’s involvement in research, using both existing systems and processes, and the possible development of new metrics and measures. Not having this information risks children and young people’s involvement continuing to develop in a piecemeal fashion. Further research is needed about how, when and where children and young people are involved in health research, and about the impact of involvement on research and on the children and young people involved.
Collapse
|
9
|
Chan W, Thurairajah P, Butcher N, Oosterwijk C, Wever K, Eichler I, Thompson C, Junker A, Offringa M, Preston J. Guidance on development and operation of Young Persons' Advisory Groups. Arch Dis Child 2020; 105:875-880. [PMID: 32209556 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-318517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2019] [Revised: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 02/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Engaging patients and the public as collaborators in research is increasingly recognised as important as such partnerships can help improve research relevance and acceptability. Young Persons' Advisory Groups (YPAGs) provide a forum for clinical researchers and triallists to engage with children and young people on issues relevant to the design, conduct and translation of paediatric clinical trials. Until fairly recently, there was very little information available to guide the successful development and operation of YPAGs. OBJECTIVE To develop an evidence-based tool to guide clinical researchers and triallists in the establishment and operation of a YPAG. METHODS An online needs assessment survey was conducted using SurveyMonkey with 60 known paediatric drug researchers to identify knowledge gaps around YPAG engagement, development and operation. Semistructured interviews with founders and coordinators of five well-established existing YPAGs and a review of the literature were performed to identify best-practice processes for starting up and operating YPAG. RESULTS The majority of 12 survey respondents (20%) from 12 different centres indicated that while they felt YPAGs could benefit their research, guidance on how to develop and operate a YPAG was needed. Most preferred a web-based guidance tool. Ten core steps in starting up and operating a YPAG were identified and developed into an online YPAG guidance tool, now freely accessible for use by paediatric clinical researchers worldwide. Plans to evaluate the impact are in place. CONCLUSIONS This novel tool, developed with an internationally based group of public involvement leads working across paediatric clinical research areas, provides harmonised guidance for researchers seeking to develop and operate YPAGs to help improve the quality and impact of paediatric clinical research studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Winnie Chan
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pravheen Thurairajah
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nancy Butcher
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Kim Wever
- Dutch Genetic Alliance, VSOP, Soest, The Netherlands
| | - Irmgard Eichler
- Department of Paediatrics, European Medicines Agency and Enpr-EMA, London, UK
| | - Charles Thompson
- International Children's Advisory Network (iCAN), Hartford, Connecticut, USA
| | - Anne Junker
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Martin Offringa
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jennifer Preston
- Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool School of Life Sciences, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Costello W, Dorris E. Laying the groundwork: Building relationships for public and patient involvement in pre-clinical paediatric research. Health Expect 2019; 23:96-105. [PMID: 31625656 PMCID: PMC6978868 DOI: 10.1111/hex.12972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2019] [Revised: 09/02/2019] [Accepted: 09/03/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Public and patient involvement is increasingly becoming an expectation of research funders and policy makers. Not all areas of health research are public-facing. Here, we outline an approach for building the skills and developing the relationships required for downstream public and patient involvement in pre-clinical adolescent rheumatology research. OBJECTIVE To design a methodology for improving researcher-adolescent communications specifically aimed at mutual relationship building for PPI. Deliberate and effective preparation in advance of research involvement to improve the downstream success of that involvement. DESIGN A research seminar and research skills workshop conducted entirely in 'plain English' for adolescents and their siblings aged 10-20. Upskilling of pre-clinical researchers for effective public involvement. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Study co-design between the voluntary charity Irish Children's Arthritis Network and the academic research centre UCD Centre for Arthritis Research. Fifteen adolescents aged 10-20 years old living with arthritis, four pre-clinical researchers and one qualitative researcher investigating adolescent or paediatric arthritis. MAIN VARIABLES STUDIED Relationship building and communications for effective downstream public involvement in pre-clinical and laboratory research. RESULTS The methodology outlined here was received extremely positively. Both researchers and adolescents living with arthritis felt more comfortable communicating, more knowledgeable about juvenile arthritis and research, and more able to engage in co-operative dialogue. DISCUSSION Engaging early, considering the needs of the community and developing appropriate involvement methodology can enable involvement in pre-clinical research. CONCLUSIONS Dedicating resources to building relationships and skills necessary for co-operative research involvement can overcome some of the barriers to public involvement in pre-clinical and laboratory-based research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy Costello
- Irish Children's Arthritis Network, Co., Tipperary, Ireland
| | - Emma Dorris
- UCD Centre for Arthritis Research, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|